The AV8B is still a hard hitting fighter...great for ground attack...If the airframe is sound, you can update and upgrade planes for a long time with new avionics. Look at the F-15, F-16, A-10, etc. Still very capable a/c.
The Harrier had recon imagery of high importance had damage to flaps and engine failure he landed it at the airfield so data could be recovered and the black box easier to find rather then ditch it in the middle of a dangerous mountainous region.. he did not stall he just brought the jet home for easier recovery
@mr9396 The harrier has been out of date for 20 years, and its being replaced by a new aircraft in 10-15 years anyway, so hwat do you do? Sacrafice more advanced aircraft we actually need? You cant just keep upgrading it and upgrading it, sooner or later it has to be retired they are almost 60 years old.
@Aliasify. Out of date, are you mad! these harriers are gr9's, they have recently been updgraded in the £500 million (JUMP) programme. They are exeptionally capable in ground attack and air defence. Just because the first variant was designed about 40 years ago, doesn't make them out of date. You can upgrade a fleet because that increases the service life. And they were going to be replaced in ten years time, so we are without a carrier fleet for a decade! even the americans still use harrers!
They said on different versions of this vid that this pilot was recovering the aircraft after taking ground fire while on a close support mission. So basically he put the rather expensive aircraft on the runway rather than destroying it on ejection. As to not being able to land a harrier conventionally thats rubbish, with nozzles forward it can land like any other aircraft. Putting the nozzles down would put extra strain on what may be a damaged engine.
Looks to me like he stalled her out :[ You have to exceed a certain set speed in an aircraft when you land it. I've almost done this before. If you don't keep the minimum speed, you'll stall out. The only other thing that could of happened is too much spoilers.
@battosaii1991 Complete rubbish, how can you stall an aircraft that can land vertically. The pilot didn't have enought nozzle, or enough power setting, or landing too heavy, or engine problems. The fact that he pitched up before landing showed he was flying it like a conventional aircraft which it is not. There are also problems where pilots can get confused with the nozzle lever and the throttle, like the Lowestoft crash, maybe here too.
@DrWatson08 Just because its a V/STOL aircraft, does not mean you HAVE to land it vertically. This is a standard landing. I do not claim to know all the controls on a harrier, but as a fellow pilot, I understand the principles of flight. As you said yourself, he didn't have enough "enought nozzle, or enough power setting" As I stated earlier, if you don't keep your aircraft (any aircraft for that matter) at its proper speed for landing you WILL stall.
@jujitsuman68 He didn't forget how to do anything, the Harrier was suffering from a major technical failure, I forget now exactly what it was but it wasn't pilot error. You can sleep tonight :)
@urmo345 I'd say the tanks were empty and the only ordanance on board were the Sidewinders, they can't be dropped, they have to be fired as they're on rails.
Look on wikipedia for RAF Harrier losses.
Scroll down to 14 may, 2009
Seems the reason for the crash was the landing gear that wouldn't extend properly, not engine failure as I 1st stated.
No fear, we will rob the uk taxpayer , deprive them of new hospitals, cut back the police force and any other method we can to keep up with the NWO agenda. British people are being sucked dry by our vampirac corrupt goverment and they cant see or bother to notice whats been going on, take it up the arse british subjects you deserve it dont you , now shut up and get back to sleep !
Ejecting that low without being up in the air can actually snap the spine and neck, I hope he is ok, Must have been a problem with the landing equipment, Raf pilots don't make mistakes, Walking computers the lot of them.
Looks like another pilot error to make the Harrier look like a bad jet again. You would think a generation raised on video games would produce better pilots.
Holy crap. If he didn't have a back problem after the belly flop the ejection looked no better. Hope he's ok, takes a lotta guts to fly one of those for sure.
im pretty sure it was mechanical problem not pilot error and i think he stayed with it to it under some kind of control right upto the point the cockpit was engulfed
@IronManXXX mate that isn't an AV8B it's a British Harrier GR7/9
harrygorrod23 2 days ago
The AV8B is still a hard hitting fighter...great for ground attack...If the airframe is sound, you can update and upgrade planes for a long time with new avionics. Look at the F-15, F-16, A-10, etc. Still very capable a/c.
IronManXXX 6 days ago
wow good camera work
mang0mang0mang0 6 days ago
The Harrier had recon imagery of high importance had damage to flaps and engine failure he landed it at the airfield so data could be recovered and the black box easier to find rather then ditch it in the middle of a dangerous mountainous region.. he did not stall he just brought the jet home for easier recovery
ibelieveinsumthin 3 weeks ago
Well, the plane was no loss because the government scrapped them recently. fuckers.
mr9396 3 weeks ago
@mr9396 The harrier has been out of date for 20 years, and its being replaced by a new aircraft in 10-15 years anyway, so hwat do you do? Sacrafice more advanced aircraft we actually need? You cant just keep upgrading it and upgrading it, sooner or later it has to be retired they are almost 60 years old.
Aliasify 2 weeks ago
@Aliasify. Out of date, are you mad! these harriers are gr9's, they have recently been updgraded in the £500 million (JUMP) programme. They are exeptionally capable in ground attack and air defence. Just because the first variant was designed about 40 years ago, doesn't make them out of date. You can upgrade a fleet because that increases the service life. And they were going to be replaced in ten years time, so we are without a carrier fleet for a decade! even the americans still use harrers!
mr9396 2 weeks ago
They said on different versions of this vid that this pilot was recovering the aircraft after taking ground fire while on a close support mission. So basically he put the rather expensive aircraft on the runway rather than destroying it on ejection. As to not being able to land a harrier conventionally thats rubbish, with nozzles forward it can land like any other aircraft. Putting the nozzles down would put extra strain on what may be a damaged engine.
djrowland323 3 weeks ago
It is an RAF pilots first royal duty to secure the tea before ejecting the aircraft. That's why he took so long. Sadly, the crumpets were KIA.
ColoursCapello 4 weeks ago 3
flying long?
captaincommando2 1 month ago
Tax payers money well spent...
jonnyboyo92 1 month ago
Looks to me like he stalled her out :[ You have to exceed a certain set speed in an aircraft when you land it. I've almost done this before. If you don't keep the minimum speed, you'll stall out. The only other thing that could of happened is too much spoilers.
battosaii1991 1 month ago
@battosaii1991 Complete rubbish, how can you stall an aircraft that can land vertically. The pilot didn't have enought nozzle, or enough power setting, or landing too heavy, or engine problems. The fact that he pitched up before landing showed he was flying it like a conventional aircraft which it is not. There are also problems where pilots can get confused with the nozzle lever and the throttle, like the Lowestoft crash, maybe here too.
DrWatson08 1 month ago
@DrWatson08 Just because its a V/STOL aircraft, does not mean you HAVE to land it vertically. This is a standard landing. I do not claim to know all the controls on a harrier, but as a fellow pilot, I understand the principles of flight. As you said yourself, he didn't have enough "enought nozzle, or enough power setting" As I stated earlier, if you don't keep your aircraft (any aircraft for that matter) at its proper speed for landing you WILL stall.
battosaii1991 1 month ago
@DrWatson08 The aircraft can stall if the nozzles aren't positioned downwards.You're talking like stalling is impossible in the Harrier.
03Wale 3 weeks ago
Oh noes! Admiral Benson again.
masterfistlord 1 month ago
@buymeamic Everyone on youtube hopes your head explodes.
Dumbass.
jthqrules 1 month ago
Comment removed
jthqrules 1 month ago
there goes 40 million
PilotInCommand100 1 month ago
Fuck, the boss is going to go nuts
oughty 2 months ago in playlist Videos
Still i wonder was it emergency landing or pilot error cause all ordinances and fuel tanks are still on and not ejected.
urmo345 2 months ago
not so successful crash landing
urmo345 2 months ago
his jet insurance must have went through the roof after this
weeguymo 2 months ago
its okay, it'll buff out
cpe111 2 months ago
he stays in the plane til he's surrounded by fire. hardcore motherfucker
joshwashposh 3 months ago 24
taliban put sugar in his fuel.
MrFattyfatfatboy 3 months ago 4
Bugger Ill have worked on that jet at some point in the past.
prophaniti1 3 months ago
I was there when that happened...crazy shit...
hooahtapout23 4 months ago
the real hero of this was the cameraman ...he captured the cockpit /plane and it was going more than 200 miles an hr ..pro;)
JimzCJ 4 months ago
man imagine that guys desion to eject while skiding along the ground fuck man
fdx723 4 months ago
PULL THE PARKING BRAKE!
MADEINMAIDEN 4 months ago
Comment removed
jujitsuman68 4 months ago
@jujitsuman68 you can clearly see the RAF roundel at 0:09
W1NgC0mM4nD3R 4 months ago
Comment removed
jujitsuman68 4 months ago
@jujitsuman68 It was an RAF Harrier
navnig 4 months ago
Comment removed
jujitsuman68 4 months ago
@jujitsuman68 He didn't forget how to do anything, the Harrier was suffering from a major technical failure, I forget now exactly what it was but it wasn't pilot error. You can sleep tonight :)
navnig 4 months ago
@navnig it had a major engine failure, never said it was pilot error and i always sleep good right after your mum sucks my cock. :)
jujitsuman68 4 months ago
@jujitsuman68 some people are just fucking wrong in the head. arsehole.
navnig 4 months ago
@navnig talking about arseholes how you doing. :)
jujitsuman68 3 months ago
@navnig Not gonna entertain a troll any longer. Enjoy the rest of your empty miserable life.
navnig 3 months ago
@navnig Then why he did not drop ordinances and fuel tanks before emergency landing?
urmo345 2 months ago
@urmo345 I'd say the tanks were empty and the only ordanance on board were the Sidewinders, they can't be dropped, they have to be fired as they're on rails.
Look on wikipedia for RAF Harrier losses.
Scroll down to 14 may, 2009
Seems the reason for the crash was the landing gear that wouldn't extend properly, not engine failure as I 1st stated.
navnig 2 months ago
shit he hit hard but any landing you walk away from is a goodie. a definite change of pants required
a4kkahu 5 months ago
That looked expensive...
Skillsthatgills1 5 months ago
The harrier looks really rugged, I expected that thing to flatten.
Me4tsh1eld 5 months ago
Is this real, its absolutely insane. Was this on the news, I would have thought something as crazy as that wudda been on the news.
footyball66 5 months ago
No fear, we will rob the uk taxpayer , deprive them of new hospitals, cut back the police force and any other method we can to keep up with the NWO agenda. British people are being sucked dry by our vampirac corrupt goverment and they cant see or bother to notice whats been going on, take it up the arse british subjects you deserve it dont you , now shut up and get back to sleep !
permaveg 6 months ago
@permaveg I bet you have like 9 cats
somethingmemorable1 5 months ago 6
a crash with full weapons equipments..amazing
primonemo 6 months ago
Love the Jdam lighting up
chrislewis1981 6 months ago
entertaining!!!!!!!
Weibkoln 6 months ago
The plane may have taken damage, if so then the pilot was lucky to get it that far....
LukeEVILED2K 7 months ago
Lucky boy!!! Was as if the air was to thin the way it pitched unless he was heavy???
camer81 7 months ago
What went wrong?
Typhoon10UK 8 months ago
Ejecting that low without being up in the air can actually snap the spine and neck, I hope he is ok, Must have been a problem with the landing equipment, Raf pilots don't make mistakes, Walking computers the lot of them.
j0rzeh 8 months ago
Looks like another pilot error to make the Harrier look like a bad jet again. You would think a generation raised on video games would produce better pilots.
waynerd23 8 months ago
@waynerd23 Yes because the RAF obviously have crap pilots. why dont you go in a harrier and show us how it's done?
rhysybum 5 months ago
Now thats good camera work . ... got EVERYTHING .
peterm3964 10 months ago
Class! :)
adamlinks 11 months ago
your fired
mathyu0179123232 1 year ago
texting while flying... :/
vipervet18 1 year ago 32
Holy crap. If he didn't have a back problem after the belly flop the ejection looked no better. Hope he's ok, takes a lotta guts to fly one of those for sure.
KA1040 1 year ago
DAMN! That pilot has BALLS for staying in there!
ninjasquirrelsrock 1 year ago
What a horrible landing approach. He was quite lucky to survive that.
Ragox 1 year ago
@Ragox
im pretty sure it was mechanical problem not pilot error and i think he stayed with it to it under some kind of control right upto the point the cockpit was engulfed
eatthisvr6 11 months ago