i dont get all this low-budget stuff because its one of those things eg: a Laptop or desktop that its not something you get everyday, when you have the chance to get a new comp , get the best you can while you have the chance. , besides intel isnt actually much more expensive when you actually buy it in a comp
Well if you put something that is supposed to be a high performance product against one that is supposed to be great performance id it really surprising that the expensive one won.
ofcourse that intel is better, triple-core is made for multi-tasking, not for better performance, it only gets better performanc in multitasking or in multithreading
Amd Phenom II x3 720 BE... Costa poco. Rende in media il 6%+ di un Intel Core Duo 2 E8400. E con dissipatore originale si over da BESTIA fino a 3,4GHz grazie al moltiplicatore sbloccato!
@andru75k4 AMD CHIPS ARE By FAR THE MOST TROUBLESOME CHIPS EVER KNOWN TO COMPUTER USERS. I CAN UNDERSTAND USING THEM ON A LOW BUDGET INCOME BUT FOR EVERY DAY USE FOR A REGULAR USER COME ON. INTEL INTEL INTEL I CANNOT STRESS IT MUCH MORE.....
First, depende of the use, a Phenom X3 for me isn't bad, he can run GTA IV in medium good, without lags and costs good. Why buy a Core 2 Duo, if it is 5% ~ 10% better than a Phenom X3 and costs 60%. Phenom X3 runs, open the Windows, play games, make editions etc.
The same with Core i7 and Phenom II, Core i7 can be better but, isn't 100% better, like 20 ~ 30% better and 100% more expensive, and in games Phenom II for me is better.
Yeah put them both in laptops and see which runs better... in a case you can add asmuch fans you like to cool the Phenom II shit but try cooling it in a laptop... I havent seen a laptop with Phenom II have you??? as soon as you give it something heavy to process it will heat up like an old russians cooker... 20-30% faster Perfect and maybe 70% more heat resistant...
the x3 is faster , look the video from amd 790gx with x3 and the intel chipset with dual core the amd is faster than a dual core from intel THIS VIDEO IS BIGGEST FAKE
Yeah it's the same shit beeng talked over and over again AMD is better and cheaperr look at the video I made... Intel is reliable it may cost more than AMD but AMD has overheating problems and alot of them so if you put to the test 2 similar processors aldough they have to be with exactly the same parameters to realy compare them so AMd may have a clearer picture than Intel in some cases but when it comes to performance and heavy rendering Intel blows AMD to pieces so buy a cheap ass fuck chip
hello people i got a real Question ok im big gamer building my first pc and i want to know plzzz intel AMD fans plz be real ok im gonna get a Phenom 9500 X4 only 89$ at TD or a C2D e7400 i want to know whats faster plz be honest because of the fact E7400 45NM vs Phenom 9500 65NM mid gaming pc plain on getting a Evga or Xfx 9800gtx or 260 or gts 250 and i really want to know whats fast 9500 or c2d e7400 witch would run crysis better im thinking 9500
LOLZZ. at X3 being represented as three cats while core 2 duo being two leapords.. the x3 series is just cheap but its third core is not utilised so its useless. if u see the benchmarks and reviews its clear that this Core line is basing AMD even the quad core phenoms
tricore for multitasking, I bought a 8650 + 780g mobo + 2 x 2 gb 800 and I loved, very good...i play half life 2 in igp all max o.O very powerfull igp too and very cheap xD
Also about the ddr2/ddr3 comments below, I found an explanation about it a few moments ago.
"At first sight, it looks like another advantage for Intel, but things are not that simple. With a faster bus and an integrated memory controller, AMD processors have no lack of bandwidth, and besides, ddr3 is still too expensive for general use."
And sorry for any grammar error. It's a quick translation from portuguese.
Gotta love these commercial-like videos. When will we see a proper comparison between processors? Is the Intel faster on those games? Yes. And on the DivX encoding? Also yes. But keep in mind that those games and encoding don't have multi-core support, that means they use 2 cores max. Just because a processor has a lot of cores, doesn't mean all of them will be used. And btw, the DivX 6.7 doesn't have multi-core support, but the 6.8 does, and i'm ready to bet the X3 will be faster on it.
wow intel gets a 1.48 in crysis......WELL WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN?? What the hell do those numbers mean? 1.48? What is that? Tempreature? FPS? Usage? Lame benchmarking.
Their fucking prosessoers, Get a fucking life, You use what you use and thats that. Stop arguing what ones better ¬_¬ Christ. I think we have more problems in life other than IS AMD or Intel better <_<.
For those of you claiming AMD is better than Intel: Show me the numbers as proof. Otherwise, you're just spewing out bullshit. Like the streetpreachers in San Francisco who claim there is a God "just 'cause", you throw out random claims with no evidence.
its because when something is a part of your life, it has to better dispite the evidence. like the people who bought an AMD without doing any research it make them feel better about their purchase.
Los productos AMD tienen la mejor relación precio/calidad en el mercado, en otras palabras tu pagas a Intel mucho más por un servicio que puede ser inferior, igual o ligeramente superior al que ofrecen los productos AMD, posiblemente la diferencia la note un aparato electrónico, pero no tu ojo... lo que sí vas a notar es que tu billetera está notoriamente más escuálida despueś de comprar un Intel en vez un AMD...
Conclusión: AMD es siempre la mejor opción de compra.
This is very true, I don't even know why AMD decided to release a triple core, such uneven numbers and horrible clock speeds, mixed with the L2 cache. It makes me puke.
Although your grammar could use some revision, why did you say "let's reframe the question".
I have amd and intel processors and I recommend intel for gamers and amd for the rest. If you want more power consumption and less performance, but better prices, go for amd.
Man, I'm NOT an intel fanboy, but guys, anyone who had an intel processor and an amd knows the difference, Example: the cache memory (I know it is not the only thing that matters but it's an example) the intel processors had always more cache than the amd ones. U know, I have intel and I you not replace it, even by the lower amd price.
Probably the reason for this is that intel doesn´t want to spend more money in research, just want to stay still as in days of the p4, shame on that cuz intel´s are good cpus.
LOL these are not comparable to games. games do not take advantage of multicore cpus yet at lest not to make a big difference. Also is 2.66ghz vs 2.3ghz and no multitask proof? finally those results are very subjective cuz we have no idea of the rigs.
This advertising only confuses some people to gain buyers and it doesnt have any fundaments.
did you know that the clock speed for amd and intel are measured differently? i think it would be better to convert amd clock speed to its intel equivilant before you compare them.
i dont see how u can get ripped of wen amd have a better price/performance ratio and have had the lead for so many years, another thing amd are way ahead in the lead in there chipsets compared to intel. none of my amd's have been unstable.
i rather have 3 too..more cores ..more speed :) even if it`s 2.30 ghz and not so many mb cache..it doesn`t matter..amd is the best..at least for angry gamers :)
that is arguable, however amd are at 45nm now, and the core2 design is a flawed system
any amd trio and quad core actually has 3 or 4 REAL cores, not this core2 duo or core2 quad mess, where its actually a dual-dual core, why you think the extremes barely outperform the quads??
I stopped watching when he said more cache on the Intel part equals be better performance. You N00b, Intel need all that cache to store data that is waiting to be sent through the outdated FSB to the memory. AMD CPUs can communicate directly with the memory which means their is less need for on die cache.
Absolutely If your not waiting for Phenom 45nm architecture then go with a 5000+/6000+/6400+ for the best dollar/performance. I run a 6000+ in ASUS M3A32-MVP DeluxeWiFi, at 3.36 (x14/FSB240, DDR2 800 at DDR2 960, HT of 1200 and let me tell you it screams. It's 100% stable, ran AMD Overdrive stability test for 72 hours and no errors. Can run at 3.45 on air but is'nt stable enough for everday use.
I looked at various benchmarks and the E8200 is faster than the X3 8650 at certain things.However the X3 8650 multitasks much better and is currently as I write $20 less expensive than the E8200 at around $165 for the X3 8650.The E8200 is around $185 and the X3 8750 is around $195.
still i put my trust to intel
turtlecat77 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol I want 1000 kitties vs your two lol amd all the way
alicklee 11 months ago
lol I want 1000 kitties vs your two lol
alicklee 11 months ago
i dont get all this low-budget stuff because its one of those things eg: a Laptop or desktop that its not something you get everyday, when you have the chance to get a new comp , get the best you can while you have the chance. , besides intel isnt actually much more expensive when you actually buy it in a comp
xFraggerHD 1 year ago
AMD is just cheap shit, that cant do anything. The only good thing about AMD is their GPU's. thats all.
xFraggerHD 1 year ago
@xFraggerHD
not with the APU fusion "llano" series for $180 you get performance that surpasses the new Intel core i7
videomaker2771 9 months ago
@videomaker2771 wow,really cus im building a new rig next month so ty!
xFraggerHD 9 months ago
Well if you put something that is supposed to be a high performance product against one that is supposed to be great performance id it really surprising that the expensive one won.
Leo101b 1 year ago
xD here are burn amd fanboys, but the correct "vs" is: core 2 duo vs amd phenom II x2
XSphynxForEvilX 1 year ago
This isnt true this video is made by intel
DarkerSkillz 1 year ago
Lame Video. Stupid Intel fanboys.
IsaiahAllen03 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@IsaiahAllen03 Fuck you, you cheap bastard.
benjamin92113 1 year ago
Someone knows what the original video because the video is already uploaded 3 people.
Please add url.
foxbet1 1 year ago
GO Go kitties!!!
Sleppy92 1 year ago
ofcourse that intel is better, triple-core is made for multi-tasking, not for better performance, it only gets better performanc in multitasking or in multithreading
MD26031994 1 year ago
Amd Phenom II x3 720 BE... Costa poco. Rende in media il 6%+ di un Intel Core Duo 2 E8400. E con dissipatore originale si over da BESTIA fino a 3,4GHz grazie al moltiplicatore sbloccato!
Vecchiodiesel 1 year ago
what a stuoid vid, higher ghz doesnt mean faster, and what are the crusis numbers 1.00 and amd has 1 billion see i can make up numbers
splice247 1 year ago
STFU you MacHead!!!
your video is soooo fake and gay.
AMD->games
Intel->money poorly spent (MacHeads love intels xD)
andru75k4 1 year ago
@andru75k4 AMD CHIPS ARE By FAR THE MOST TROUBLESOME CHIPS EVER KNOWN TO COMPUTER USERS. I CAN UNDERSTAND USING THEM ON A LOW BUDGET INCOME BUT FOR EVERY DAY USE FOR A REGULAR USER COME ON. INTEL INTEL INTEL I CANNOT STRESS IT MUCH MORE.....
benjamin92113 1 year ago
Hmmm this is the old X3 8600...but what about the X3 720? The 720 is cheaper and faster than E8400. This commerical is out of date....
NRB177 1 year ago
Phenom X3 use 45nm where you get that info? outdated ?
AMD have 3DNow! instruction to process 3D game,
what Intel have, AMD have (MMX, SSE1,2,3... 64bit)
what AMD have, Intel not have (3DNow!, AMD-V)
Anim4000 2 years ago
@Anim4000 Hey dumbass this video was uploaded in 2008. You just tarnished the image of any AMD fanboy I know - barely observes their surrounding.
geeorgeeor 1 year ago
lesliecswu
freaking lol!
halfpol 2 years ago
jajaja pinche video
AizenChris 2 years ago
*cough* its called Phenom X3 tard, not Core 3 Phenom...
Intel fanboys FTL
nelizmastr 2 years ago
baddest intel commercial ever
bmxismylife123 2 years ago 2
There still are fags with Pentium 4s that claim that they are better than de Athlon 64s. well... A 2Ghz Athlon 64 is faster than a 3Ghz P4. go figure
nelizmastr 2 years ago
First, depende of the use, a Phenom X3 for me isn't bad, he can run GTA IV in medium good, without lags and costs good. Why buy a Core 2 Duo, if it is 5% ~ 10% better than a Phenom X3 and costs 60%. Phenom X3 runs, open the Windows, play games, make editions etc.
The same with Core i7 and Phenom II, Core i7 can be better but, isn't 100% better, like 20 ~ 30% better and 100% more expensive, and in games Phenom II for me is better.
miti1st 2 years ago
Yeah put them both in laptops and see which runs better... in a case you can add asmuch fans you like to cool the Phenom II shit but try cooling it in a laptop... I havent seen a laptop with Phenom II have you??? as soon as you give it something heavy to process it will heat up like an old russians cooker... 20-30% faster Perfect and maybe 70% more heat resistant...
ladev1988 2 years ago
just buy a intel pentium 3 and youll have a monster build^_^...
hahahahha.
Testingpointer1 2 years ago
Core i7 FTW !!!!!
CerebralAssAssin3 2 years ago
For me AMD Phenom 2 Kick and the Price Rullz
AMD - ATI Radeon Best Choice . Noob Intel Movie
MasterDOOM2010 2 years ago
AMD x3 can`t compaire with C2Q q9550 because q9550 can matchup with their phenom II x4
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
the x3 is faster , look the video from amd 790gx with x3 and the intel chipset with dual core the amd is faster than a dual core from intel THIS VIDEO IS BIGGEST FAKE
Dragst3er 2 years ago
its a 790gx chipset with HD3300
an the dual core with intel g31 chipset wit g3100 onboard
how about E8400 + P45 OC`ed + GTX 295
X3 can`t catchup with E84 even a X4 phenom
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
The Athlon II 250 from AMD is faster than the E8400 and costs only €55, while the 8400 ships for around €220-250
RIPOFFS
nelizmastr 2 years ago
Yeah it's the same shit beeng talked over and over again AMD is better and cheaperr look at the video I made... Intel is reliable it may cost more than AMD but AMD has overheating problems and alot of them so if you put to the test 2 similar processors aldough they have to be with exactly the same parameters to realy compare them so AMd may have a clearer picture than Intel in some cases but when it comes to performance and heavy rendering Intel blows AMD to pieces so buy a cheap ass fuck chip
ladev1988 2 years ago
that proved that AMD rules in terms of chipsets
nelizmastr 2 years ago
to bad intel is expensive and slow
steaklol990 2 years ago
intel is so expensive :o
pur3th 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
amit18phogat 2 years ago
AMD+ATI = Monster PC , Heavy Duty , Thunder.
amit18phogat 2 years ago
hello people i got a real Question ok im big gamer building my first pc and i want to know plzzz intel AMD fans plz be real ok im gonna get a Phenom 9500 X4 only 89$ at TD or a C2D e7400 i want to know whats faster plz be honest because of the fact E7400 45NM vs Phenom 9500 65NM mid gaming pc plain on getting a Evga or Xfx 9800gtx or 260 or gts 250 and i really want to know whats fast 9500 or c2d e7400 witch would run crysis better im thinking 9500
jimmybrown1221 2 years ago
Get a E8400
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
ive always used AMD +ATI... and played some games.. and never had a problem... but why should INTEL or AMD suck? Beats me
IHONDURASI 2 years ago
XD noob if you set the acc on auto you got 4cores XD haha AMD wins always
zatlapp 2 years ago
intel the best
jobelle27 2 years ago
Phenom II X3 720 BE 2.8 GHZ >>>> E8500>>>>>E8400
xxmiguelxx93 2 years ago
FUCK INTEL...
AMD THE BEST PROCESSOR
gta1692 2 years ago
intel = lol
amd= cool
i fuck all intel processor? yes!
amd+ati=cool
TssShemik 3 years ago
E8400 SUCK BALLS after Phenom II 720BE , LOL
imamage 3 years ago
thats fake as fuck the amd is faster and better watch more videos about this you will see.
bihohran 3 years ago
fake, Advanced Micro Devices Rules!!!
Erchus91 3 years ago 2
You bet, mate!
StokaSR 3 years ago 2
LOLZZ. at X3 being represented as three cats while core 2 duo being two leapords.. the x3 series is just cheap but its third core is not utilised so its useless. if u see the benchmarks and reviews its clear that this Core line is basing AMD even the quad core phenoms
desperategamer93 3 years ago
but i want the kitties!!!
yuki953 3 years ago 7
tricore for multitasking, I bought a 8650 + 780g mobo + 2 x 2 gb 800 and I loved, very good...i play half life 2 in igp all max o.O very powerfull igp too and very cheap xD
MummRa88 3 years ago
Also about the ddr2/ddr3 comments below, I found an explanation about it a few moments ago.
"At first sight, it looks like another advantage for Intel, but things are not that simple. With a faster bus and an integrated memory controller, AMD processors have no lack of bandwidth, and besides, ddr3 is still too expensive for general use."
And sorry for any grammar error. It's a quick translation from portuguese.
joaoassuncao1 3 years ago
Gotta love these commercial-like videos. When will we see a proper comparison between processors? Is the Intel faster on those games? Yes. And on the DivX encoding? Also yes. But keep in mind that those games and encoding don't have multi-core support, that means they use 2 cores max. Just because a processor has a lot of cores, doesn't mean all of them will be used. And btw, the DivX 6.7 doesn't have multi-core support, but the 6.8 does, and i'm ready to bet the X3 will be faster on it.
joaoassuncao1 3 years ago 2
Exactly, another reason to buy from intel!
galileo021728 3 years ago
the tri cores series really dont make much sense.
Oeszilee 3 years ago
wow intel gets a 1.48 in crysis......WELL WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN?? What the hell do those numbers mean? 1.48? What is that? Tempreature? FPS? Usage? Lame benchmarking.
thefamilyk 3 years ago 14
1.48 more suckage WOW 48, 43, 32 percent SUCKIER! how about we compare phenom and c2q then let's talk business
thivous 3 years ago
that reply was confusing...
thefamilyk 3 years ago
@thefamilyk the speed and performace ? ??????? OMG intel is better .........
maffin006 1 year ago
@thefamilyk
agreed
videomaker2771 9 months ago
I hope someone does a video with the
Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz LGA 1366 Quad-Core vs AMD 9950BE Phenom.
2point6x4 3 years ago
THE CAKE IS A SPY! lol.
doyouhavedrift 3 years ago
i never realy was on your side
BasCPU 3 years ago
sorry I didn't mean it that way. AMD is greatest thing on face of the earth.
dan30000 3 years ago
Intel won...
narcis4none 3 years ago
Stupid advertising... HAHAHA
doggysoftbg 3 years ago
Their fucking prosessoers, Get a fucking life, You use what you use and thats that. Stop arguing what ones better ¬_¬ Christ. I think we have more problems in life other than IS AMD or Intel better <_<.
sousuke121 3 years ago
disgruntled amd owner.
Halfassmountainboy 3 years ago
AMD IS THE SHIT
dan30000 3 years ago
no, AMD is shit. The 'the' in that statement was unneccessary, dan30000.
ChickenAttackForce 3 years ago
yeh.. the bad shit.
Halfassmountainboy 3 years ago
the larger die has more transistors you fucking idiot.
the smaller 45nm chip has less. fag.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
actually the 45nm has more, just smaller... dumbass
Halfassmountainboy 3 years ago
no it has less alot less.
you fucking monkey.
bongman4ghz 3 years ago
I think I'll pick the cute kitties.
IIIlllll 3 years ago
Maybe you are a kittie.
sa66o6 3 years ago
For those of you claiming AMD is better than Intel: Show me the numbers as proof. Otherwise, you're just spewing out bullshit. Like the streetpreachers in San Francisco who claim there is a God "just 'cause", you throw out random claims with no evidence.
r31ncarnat3d 3 years ago
its because when something is a part of your life, it has to better dispite the evidence. like the people who bought an AMD without doing any research it make them feel better about their purchase.
Halfassmountainboy 3 years ago
Intel uses slower cache, + 0KB L3!
Where is the specifications of systems?
Pokemon192XD 3 years ago
urmm, despite the 'l3' name effectively one-upping l2 cache its actually slower than l2 cache
richardbirch2007 3 years ago
Los productos AMD tienen la mejor relación precio/calidad en el mercado, en otras palabras tu pagas a Intel mucho más por un servicio que puede ser inferior, igual o ligeramente superior al que ofrecen los productos AMD, posiblemente la diferencia la note un aparato electrónico, pero no tu ojo... lo que sí vas a notar es que tu billetera está notoriamente más escuálida despueś de comprar un Intel en vez un AMD...
Conclusión: AMD es siempre la mejor opción de compra.
Ray0X0 3 years ago
This is very true, I don't even know why AMD decided to release a triple core, such uneven numbers and horrible clock speeds, mixed with the L2 cache. It makes me puke.
Although your grammar could use some revision, why did you say "let's reframe the question".
Technically, it's "rephrase".
pikachuhobbes 3 years ago
the guy is professional ... dont talk gramma .. you know nothing !!!
zloben9000 3 years ago
I got an amd 9600 and it runs circles around anything else, and i'm a ubuntu x64 usr
modmadmike2 3 years ago
intel sucks AMD 4 LIVE
sniper287 3 years ago
amd fail. hard.
richardbirch2007 3 years ago
amd is way better intel jucks
sniper287 3 years ago
Why AMD is better?
sa66o6 3 years ago
I want 3 cats because at least they wont attempt to kill me ( or burst into flames )
Tippey786 3 years ago
lol. : )
2point8GHz 3 years ago 2
amd is shit even for games mostly
metalmarioownz 3 years ago 2
I have amd and intel processors and I recommend intel for gamers and amd for the rest. If you want more power consumption and less performance, but better prices, go for amd.
strikerhiryu 3 years ago 2
LOL! i love how they coompair the e8200 against the 8600, it still ad tlb and is priced the same as the 9600, 9600 pwns e8200 ANY day.
qwertymac93 3 years ago
you - will*
myxBow 3 years ago
HAHAHA
Man, I'm NOT an intel fanboy, but guys, anyone who had an intel processor and an amd knows the difference, Example: the cache memory (I know it is not the only thing that matters but it's an example) the intel processors had always more cache than the amd ones. U know, I have intel and I you not replace it, even by the lower amd price.
myxBow 3 years ago
lululululululz
3 cores is still better than 2?
2.30x3
2.60x2
AMD still winz?
halospawn0 3 years ago
WELL, I know which processor my next PC is going to have.
AgentZero88 3 years ago
DAMN!!! Intel is evil.
SoldierInAllahsArmy 3 years ago 2
Wow, that was a lowblow by Intel.
adamvandyke2 3 years ago
Probably the reason for this is that intel doesn´t want to spend more money in research, just want to stay still as in days of the p4, shame on that cuz intel´s are good cpus.
winpeaze 3 years ago
LOL these are not comparable to games. games do not take advantage of multicore cpus yet at lest not to make a big difference. Also is 2.66ghz vs 2.3ghz and no multitask proof? finally those results are very subjective cuz we have no idea of the rigs.
This advertising only confuses some people to gain buyers and it doesnt have any fundaments.
people just have to choose whatever fits most.
winpeaze 3 years ago
lol- stupid Advertising intel.
michalstim 3 years ago
did you know that the clock speed for amd and intel are measured differently? i think it would be better to convert amd clock speed to its intel equivilant before you compare them.
leongradoazz 3 years ago
dat last coment was 4 Iciielitez
arungordon1234 3 years ago
Intel fanboy much, LOL
kwyjibosponge 3 years ago
The guy is quoting single threaded benches.
Phenom does not require as much cache as the C2D because of the direct access to the RAM.
The 45nm E8200 has less transistors than the 65nm E6750.
worshipme213 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Get core 2 its better dont get ripped off on x3s and x4 its unstable!
Iciielitez 3 years ago
basing facts upon other people's videos on the internet is just sad
hazyazn 3 years ago
i dont see how u can get ripped of wen amd have a better price/performance ratio and have had the lead for so many years, another thing amd are way ahead in the lead in there chipsets compared to intel. none of my amd's have been unstable.
arungordon1234 3 years ago 3
fuck intel
even amd single core are better than intel dual core
to know which is better make a live challenge see who better
fidotcsm 3 years ago
i rather have 3 too..more cores ..more speed :) even if it`s 2.30 ghz and not so many mb cache..it doesn`t matter..amd is the best..at least for angry gamers :)
Cristy1992 3 years ago
lol!! at least for angry gamers?!!
antmiu2 3 years ago
look at the facts core 2 duo is faster on crysis then this amd what jelous that you have AMD? and i have core 2 duo XD
dragonrow3 3 years ago 3
fuck you!
Fuelaenir 3 years ago
Id rather have 3 =]
Goststriker 3 years ago
exactly dude! even if you get quad-, hexa-, octo- or decicore, you still stay DUMB as hell. So f#ck you and your video too!
MAMOHT82 3 years ago
LOL! Gayest video ever :)
State of the art 45 ? Lol,such an idiot .
Do you know that AMD is much for sofisticated and more high tech then Intel ?
Do you know even something about HT link?
And what are those gay "Poot up to tests " ? Where did those numbers came from?
Lol , just die mofo ,i hope you had your fun making this foolish video ;)
Bibazavr 3 years ago 3
i have amd and i had intel before and both are good actually but actually amd is the weaker link
intel creates some new tech on their cpu, amd buys a chip, examine it, create on the just the same way to stay in the league.
plus for intel haters, you better thank intel for CREATING the cpu
AMD just came in out of no where
but both are great cards tho
combo360 3 years ago
amd came up with the quadcore gpu..
Hannes9211 3 years ago
i find it ridicules that people actually go out of their way to create videos like this.
LordSamuelJ 3 years ago 2
that is arguable, however amd are at 45nm now, and the core2 design is a flawed system
any amd trio and quad core actually has 3 or 4 REAL cores, not this core2 duo or core2 quad mess, where its actually a dual-dual core, why you think the extremes barely outperform the quads??
ozzyhammJR 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
looks like more isnt always better
voyanger 3 years ago
I stopped watching when he said more cache on the Intel part equals be better performance. You N00b, Intel need all that cache to store data that is waiting to be sent through the outdated FSB to the memory. AMD CPUs can communicate directly with the memory which means their is less need for on die cache.
worshipme213 3 years ago 4
y bueno, con lo que sale el core 2 se pueden meter el dedo en la cola y saltar de la felicidad
caishaf 3 years ago
x3 cant be beat for the money..or get a 6400x2 or 5000x2 black if u oc..its 65nm and can get to 3.2 no problem
yaiknowscrewme 3 years ago 2
Absolutely If your not waiting for Phenom 45nm architecture then go with a 5000+/6000+/6400+ for the best dollar/performance. I run a 6000+ in ASUS M3A32-MVP DeluxeWiFi, at 3.36 (x14/FSB240, DDR2 800 at DDR2 960, HT of 1200 and let me tell you it screams. It's 100% stable, ran AMD Overdrive stability test for 72 hours and no errors. Can run at 3.45 on air but is'nt stable enough for everday use.
06sterling 3 years ago
horseshit..
SimonLANO 3 years ago 7
lol
sublime0 3 years ago 3
I looked at various benchmarks and the E8200 is faster than the X3 8650 at certain things.However the X3 8650 multitasks much better and is currently as I write $20 less expensive than the E8200 at around $165 for the X3 8650.The E8200 is around $185 and the X3 8750 is around $195.
m9078jk3 3 years ago 4
8750x3 is 135$ newegg
yaiknowscrewme 3 years ago
WOW... thats bull shit...
dtfann03 3 years ago 7
indeed
golem72002 3 years ago