Love Prof. Passmore's old-school Australian accent. Also enjoyed his none-too-subtle jibe at "what passes now as literary criticism" (6' 06"). Hahaha.
I agree, how can you fully describe and experience or how do you describe to someone who hasn't experienced. . . there are never enough words, or at least the words are not as pure/clear as the ideas they want to protray
Thank you for the videos
5dsdouglas 11 months ago
Thank You very much for such extraordinary plausible pieces of video.
avolynskiy 2 years ago 4
plausible?
arn123321 1 year ago
Comment removed
langengro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Humes Fork:-
When approaching a body of knowledge for the first time one must ask oneself two main questions:
Do the ideas concern matters of fact or
Do they concern the relations between ideas
If the answer to both these questions is no, then commit these writings to the flames because they can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.
Does this mean we need to hold a book burning party for your philosophical writings Mr Hume?
TwoMunchu 3 years ago
Only if they're not claiming to be about facts, which they are.
Myndir 3 years ago 6
no, i think its a metaphor
mohamedbongfish 2 years ago
@TwoMunchu lol you should ask him that when he's alive
glamdringwhite03 1 year ago
@TwoMunchu You're an idiot.
Paraconsistant 8 months ago
I recall the animated Aasimov film, Light Years: "The 'I' does not exist!"
Organon1m 3 years ago 2
Love Prof. Passmore's old-school Australian accent. Also enjoyed his none-too-subtle jibe at "what passes now as literary criticism" (6' 06"). Hahaha.
lysis28 3 years ago 3
3:40, the social-sciences . . .
I agree, how can you fully describe and experience or how do you describe to someone who hasn't experienced. . . there are never enough words, or at least the words are not as pure/clear as the ideas they want to protray
theinternetscholar 3 years ago
I am enjoying these interviews tremendously.
rogermoore27 3 years ago 11