Global carbon dioxide levels is fixed by photosynthesis not manned: mankind just increased life on earth. He can't increase the level of carbon dioxide in the air
The last bad hurricane year was eight years ago. The world has been cooling for 13 years now. Looks so mean why carbon dioxide has nothing to do the weather. So you must be a paid nuclear stooge
who cares what the politicians say. I prefer to look at the scientific debate. The peer reviewed scientific consensus is soundly in the 'how much does CO2 effect global temperatures" phase. Temperature carbon relationships are understood by a variety of scientific measuring methodologies, so pointing out a few badly placed temperature gauges proves nothing. Bob Carter you can fool a few naive viewers on YouTube but if you try and support it withe real evidence you are as phoney as Monckton.
@Binkophile I don't think you understand the scientific process and the nature of peer reviewed science. Monckton is not a scientist. He doesn't understand basic science and confuses for example solar forcing and sensitivity in his talks.
"but if you try and support it with real evidence you are as phoney as Monckton." - this is just plain stupid. Yes you need to support a statement which is way outside the consensus with evidence. Imagine he said smoking didn't cause cancer with no evidence.
@richiesvideo Sorry old boy, Jones lied, people died and Mann got his whitewash by an inhouse bunch of drinking buddies. Monckton is as fluent with the science as anyone on Youtube and I do feel he has you terrified.
wow, tree huggers these days need to go out and get a life! no one cares about you and your conspericies! get out of your grandma's basement and make some friends!
The reason why I find global warming to be so concurrent is because of the spiritual repercussions.
I hope Heaven is a real place unaffected by the universal cycle. Because if the entire solar system is entering a warmer section of the universe... what if your spirit lasts forever in the afterlife and what if your spirit can still feel pain and what if... the planet heats to unbelievably hot temperatures... Its going to like burning bones that dont die? I guess the pain will pass.
I had wondered why we are so pumped full of this global warming propaganda without any actual evidence for it. Now I understand why. Our own met office has key figureheads being funded to publish in its favor. As the met office is part of the ministry of deference it will be trusted and the government will go along with its own green taxes/carbon trading agenda. The BBC is unlikely to criticize as they are not scientifically savvy. And we are stuck with parliamentary idiot Chis Huhne!
WOW - like many, I was beginning to believe in CO2 global warming....
Facts really take a beating when the mass of people, governments and journalists using social media focus on/or are given the wrong information. Social media seems to me like a global hive mind, a head full of thoughts competing and searching for the correct answers.
Unfortunately - If we were given the wrong information about global warming, its going to take years to filter through to change our social networked global mind.
IF CO2 IS SO BAD WHY DO SCHWEPPES AND COCA COLA DISSOLVE MILLIONS OF TONNES OF IT IN FIZZY DRINKS EVERY DAY SO YOU CAN BURP IT OUT OF YOUR GOBS??
WHY DOES NO-ONE SPEAK OF THIS AS A HUGE CLIMATE 'CRIME' ???
ARE THEY BEING TAXED ON THIS OR IS IT ONLY FUEL BEING TAXED TO DEATH??
WHY WOULD THAT BE?
MAYBE 'COS IT'S ALL A LOAD OF BELCH... CO2 ISN'T CAUSING ANYTHING BUT INDIGESTION. TAKE A RENNIE... LET'S GET ON WITH EXERCISING AND PROTECTING WHAT LITTLE FREEDOM WE HAVE LEFT. EG: FREEDOM TO TRAVEL..
carter has ties to corporate carbon industries and has never completed a study on how humans are warming the planet. I asked him. With a little research his history is telling. One of the best sites for a summary is good old Wikipedia. Here's an article that also helps.
Google: Refuting claims that climate forecasts are all up in the air
It is sad and immoral that the vested corporate interests are willing to sacrifice future generations for business-as-usual.
@ReduceGHGs - It's sad that you are willing to sacrifice millions of lives and trillions in wealth for your political ego. It's sad that you completely ignore the role that politicians are playing as the DRIVING force in the religion of power that is global warming.
Like thinning carter has anything meaningful to contribute. He doesn't. But to get to him you have to ignore the many, many very credible experts out there that have studies and respected institutions to back them up. Keep digging, you'll find carter under a rock slimed with vested interest goo. Those corporate interests care nothing for our future generations. They want carter slimed up and looking slick!
Hmmm....odd. When NGO's and various think tanks and universities made bold warmist claims re global warming I did not see you and yours rail about their addiction to taxpayer grant funding.
bob carter has NEVER completed or seen a study that has determined humans are not warming the planet or that continuing to add CO2 to the atmosphere is not harmful. I asked him last year and he said he didn't have a study. This guy is a marine geologist that studies PAST climates not how humans affect climate today or in the future.
Wrong. Gore hasn't been involved with politics for many years.
If you'd like to learn with his activities are now, Wiki does a pretty good job of giving some detail.
What I don't recommed doing is relying on what Gore says. Read what all of our respected scientific institutions have been saying.
Certainly don't rely on bob carter. Even Wiki tell the story of his ties to corporate interests. Besides, he has no study to back up his claims. I asked him.
Al Gore runs an investment fund that invests in environmentally friendly technologies.
Do you think he has a vested interest?
You have been conned and fallen for it hook line and sinker. If you from the USA you will have enjoyed the lovely winter. Is cold weather due to warming as well?
Try an experiment. Imagine that Gore isn't and never was here. What are you left with? You still have the same well established science that Gore has been talking about. EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions concurs; we humans are warming the planet and the consequences are not good. Are they all wrong? Is it a global conspiracy? Come, let’s get real.
.
The last decade was the hottest recorded. Recent weather is not climate. Know the difference?
Google Global Warming Petition Project. There are more than 31000 more scientists who disagree with you and have every right to be heard and not censored.
This man Bob Carter has made some astonishing points. Are you prepared to say that every single he says is untrue?
You apparently haven't researched the Petition Project (The Oregon Petition). Try doing so. It was corporate propaganda. I asked aurthor robinson, one of the "authors" of that nonsense, if he had a study to support their contention that humans are not warming the planet. He didn't of course. I also asked bob carter if he had a study supporting what he is talking about. He didn't either. These folks do not represent the state of current credible science. Try NAS and AAAS.
Silly goose, there are hundreds of the IPCC that aren't even scientists and many who had to threaten to sue to have their names removed. Also, since the summary was issued first and then the report, one might sanely conclude that the evidence was made to fit the crime.
And it's a crime that you don't know who R. Spenser is.
And how about all those melting Himalayan glaciers? I guess the hack train engineer from India is in hiding since he was humiliated on that.
The reason you are no longer allowed to send me messages is because of your vulgar and nasty tone. Calling me names is poor support for your denial of climate change just as is using j. christy and r. spenser while ignoring what EVERY respected scientific institution has concluded.
So try to be nice or please keep your vulgarity to yourself. Perhaps that's where it belongs. That would be sad for you.
oh dear......I called you a silly goose and you are weeping into your knitting. Good riddance. The world needs more men who can deal with the truth and you don't measure up I am certain.
@amaRay. Then there's people that think bob carter has something meaningful to contribute. Sorry, he doesn't. He is a marine geologist that has no study to back up his opinions. How would I know? I asked him. In addition he has industry ties. They aren't interested in anything but corporate profits, business-as-usual, without regard to what our future generations will have to pay.
Thanks for cleaning up your language! Still, you have no credible support. Why parrot the propaganda?
Poor baby. All of Mr. Carter's data has been displayed by others on the case. And you find his scientific background offputting? You dunce. A cursory check on the pedigrees of the IPCC gang would make you blow your stack in outrage.
Have a nice day, but don't forget that you are on the losing side of the debate.
All through parts 1 through 4 Bob Carter has names of scientists and organizations that present these uncomfortable graphs and facts. If I can here him quote names and organizations, how can you not?
As a layman, and clearly you are, how is it that you can judge the validity of what bob carter is telling you? You can't.
As for the IPCC, they reviewed hundreds of studies and found, FOUR times now, that we humans are warming the planet. This isn't news and they certainly aren't the only body of expertise saying it. EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions that studied the issue concluded about the same on the core issue. What more would a rational mind need?
Phil Jones wants to sell you some beachfront property in Arizona. He knows what a deep thinker you are and he also says his pal Micky Mann has some old ice hockey equipment he wants to sell you. They both need the cash since the river of milk and honey grant cash is drying up and they do need to hide the decline.
Can't you come up with something less adolescent? How about attempting a real argument, you know, with evidence supporting conclusions? Need help with critical thinking?
We would talk about the IPCC and what they did but you won't listen. NAS, NCAR, AIP, AAAS, and all the other respected scientific bodies don't matter either do they? Why is that? Go figure.
@ReduceGHGs Speaking of core issues.... core samples from both Antarctic ice caps and deep sea bed samples conclude a 650-2000 year gap in CO2 levels and consequential temperature increase... this is documented in Nature, the peer reviewed journal fyi...
Some “experts” use data like that to guide the layman down the wrong path. It deals with what some all the "lead-lag" issue. This is over simplified but… Natural CO2 buildup does appear to increase after temps increase. But keep in mind humans were not moving carbon to any degree during those times. Natural CO2 increases are certainly expected to again follow the temps we are driving up. That compounds the long-term problem. I'll send you a link to one of many sources.
@ReduceGHGs Alright, sources are always nice... "Natural CO2 increases are certainly expected to again follow the temps we are driving up"... So you are saying that we are driving up temperature which is then driving up natural CO2... So if that is the case than your basically saying that global warming is not caused by man, but can be exacerbated by man adding more atmospheric CO2 after warming has already started? How is man alone then heating up the planet in the first place w/o CO2?
I'm not making conclusions. What I'm saying is that you should read about this issue and learn what the experts say. I posted a couple links on your board but maybe you deleted them as they didn't agree with your predisposition?
Yes, anthropogenic warming is occurring as per EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions. EVERY ONE of them.
Do some reading if you really want to learn what the state of the science is. If you already think you know all about it, congrats.
@ReduceGHGs - You're funny. You have no idea that mutual benefits to governments and "scientists" in promoting the global warming scam.
Governments need research to be air-tight, so to speak, to prop up their increased regulation.
"Scientists" need money to live, they get it from government grants and government universities. Those that disagree with global warming aren't treated as healthy skeptics, they're treated as heretics. They don't advance, and they aren't heard.
Nice video. Very nice to watch a clearly spoken, non-emotional scientist, who isn't afraid of being labelled a 'GW denier'. In 5 or 10 years, there will be some other HUGE issue, and all the 'Chicken Littles' of the past 6 years or so, will have moved onto another more convient topic for saving the world with socio-economic 'falling skies', while conveniently forgeting how empassioned they have been with this topic.
Thank God someone has the passion and knowledge to show what an absolute scam global warming is. Our politicians as usual follow like blind mice taxing the hell out of us, And for what? Well done Bob Carter. It must be so frustrating trying to get your message across to the uninterested and ignorant.
Nice upload. Global Warming from the people who brought you War, on Global Terror or whathaveyou. Always fighting something with your trillions, these maniacs.
Hey Bob Carter... How is it all three satellite data sets agree with the ground station measurements for global average temperature? No air conditioners in space.
Bob Carters presentation here is stupid. Temperature measurments all over the northern hemisphere are showing the same trends, the data from stations near cities AND from stations a long way outside the cities. GodAthie, do your homework before commenting. We have interglacial periods each approximately each 100.000 years, these are mainly due to changes in the earths orbit around the sun, the so called Milancovitch cycle, natural changes. These changes happen very very slow, and affects
@bergiussss temperatures. Whem temperatures increases, CO2 will naturally be released from the oceans, and amplify the temperatures increasement. This happens during periods of several 1000 years. Whats different now is that co2 concentrations is higher than it has been during the last 400.000 years, and it increases at an alarming pace, and acting as FAST FEEDBACK, wrather than a slow feedback mechanism. 97% of the scientists agree on anthropogenic CC, stop debating, and change your lifestyle.
Hwzit goin deniers? Hottest day in NY, in LA (even taking out the electricity grid), biggest floods innPakistan, hottest day in London, record rain in sydney, fires in Moscow, record floods central Australia, hottest day fer the month very second month in Australia, frozen river in south America, record rains in queensland.... Any of these qualify for extreme events?
@bernzeppi 'Records' and acts and god listed without resources or reference. Make an effort if you're trying to convince anyone that the earth is getting hotter in unpredicatble or unusual ways and that it is due to human activity.
i'm collecting info on various topics and thought people might like to see the vids on my profile about chem trails a.k.a. geo-engineering where you can find the links to the patents for these aerosols which are supposedly being used to cool the planet since the mid 1990s. There are also other asortments of youtube vids on miscellaneous topics
To those who feel strongly on EITHER SIDE: It's fair to watch this, AND Al Gore's movie.
Problem is, Gore's position appeals to the human psyche. It feels good to believe you're "part of the solution" every time you judge someone else for using the wrong kind of grocery bag.
Believing as I do, ALL of my friends think I'm conspiracy theorist brainwashed by big oil.
Believe me, I would feel a lot more comfortable and well-liked on the other side of the debate. I stand by what I see.
I really want to know. REALLY want to know. If you can predict the weather in 2015, 2035. WHY IN THE HE** can't the weather man get it right on the 3 day forecast?
Al Gore has made how much since he left office? If he REALLY saw that global warming is a farce, where or what is his next job? The IGNORING of empirical scientific facts that argue against you is about as bright as thinking your Superman and bullets won't hurt you.
If he is really rational about this, he should be ready to eat his words in a decade or so. It is OK to pick on bad nuts among the climate research community but Bob draws generalizations without proof. I feel the whole debate went wrong. Too little discussion of the actual science. We need the modelers to speak up. Let's talk principle here, and then the data. First: What happens when you burn up in 150 years most of what took millions of years to form?
Still I'm dubious about him saying that global warming is normal because there is global warming a long, long time ago. He seems to say that there is global warming before therefore global warming now a natural cause. Doesn't seem logical to me.
one of the most spurious sets of claims that you can find. it's cooling? sure. but the weather stations are in chimneys? so which data set is he using? which data set shows cooling? nah, he didn't leave the graphs up for long enough. just show 1998 and pretend that everything is going down. i hope this oil and mining shill is running for cover in 2010 the way he should be. i hear he wrote some attacks on hansen. all he has left. cya, bob. better luck next time - you and the ipa should slink off.
Excellent video, the politicians have no idea what they're talking about and they're furthering a cause which as this bloke quite rightly said, should be dead in the water.
@SoreSmokingMariachi You think GW's a scam? This numbnuts just predicted another iceage. How expensive do you think dealing with that problem will be?
Even the few weak scientists you can buy for the denier side come off as wacky. There are hundreds of deniers who make fun of how a scientific consensus in the 70s was for global cooling (There wasn't), and the guy they get to defend their viewpoint is a global cooling advocate. The irony is hilarious.
Yet another NWO agenda around global warming extracting & scaring countries worldwide to pay carbon taxes on a natural cycle of the planet, education & common sense tells you pollution is a concern but cleaner energy & restricting deforestation,replanting trees is crucial.
Very good presentation of the sceptical view. This is the first I've seen which isn't made by a collegestudent or a child who wants to keep his wellfare. However, I don't believe in Global Warming. I believe in Global Climate Change, and that's a big difference. As he said in the end; There IS a threat, and it can as much be a Global Cooling as an Warming. And it may even be both. When even a great sceptical says that, then you can't ignore it. We are facing great changes in climate.
look at the guys entire presentation... the climate change we are going through is small when we compare it to the past. even the peak tempatures themselves arent that low or high.
stop thinking about 100years and start looking at the thousands and millions cause then youll see what we do doesnt do a damn thing
Sorry I'm in the wrong blog. Due to global disruptions in our internet connections. Ontario is experiencing global lightning and global raining, so unlike the global drought predicted by global fat pig Al Gore. You'll notice he is suffering from global obesity and global horniness. Masseurs are at risk.
Read the bible: Jesus says, I have not come to bring peace, I have come to bring the sword. Getting superstition out of the way, where was I?
You people seem to have a handle on this alarmism.
CO2 is less than 1% of the molecules of this atmosphere and there is no way that increasing CO2 from 400 to 500 parts per million is going to force the moderating effect of 190,000 ppm oxygen and 890,000 ppm nitrogen. But with this new science created by Al Gore, the earth could self combust.
Like i have heard before, when the earth starts to cool ( it's only a matter of when) the cost to humankind will cost more in everthing. eg. crops not growing
(remove spaces) If Monbiot (moonbat to us climate realists) needs to change Lord Monckton's writings to suit his agenda, then it shows how low warmists will stoop to peddle AGW. Pack of liars, right @Nightversionn?
"the evidence of a human fingerprint on the global and regional climate is incontrovertible as clearly illustrated in the National Research Council report and in our research papers"
As the climate fear activists point fingers and regress into amusing rants, the evidence that the global warming fear movement is collapsing - abounds.
'
Excellent page with many links to climate FACTS:
ww w. climatedepot. com/a/2597/Exposed-Climate-Fear-Promoters-Greatest-Fear--A-Public-Trial-of-the-Evidence-of-Global-Warming-Fears-Inconvenient-Developments-Continue-To-Mount
'
(remove spaces)
'
It's an August 2009 article and therefore doesn't yet mention the Climategate emails.
Co2 has increased by 4% in the 21st century yet still there has been no warming?
So Co2 increases by 4% but the temperature does not increase at all...hmmm... Imperical data vs. playstation models. CRU admits natural variation not included in early models...hmmm.. interesting. But that would mean my electric bill going up 150% just to enrich the government and goldman sachs and the CCX and not AGW!! What a shocker!! The most massive redistribution scheme in history. Bye bye world economy.
@patpilotglider re: temperatures are the highest on record for the last 12 Months ! Recognise the problem then fix it, don,t ignore it.
Yes, we have gone up 0.8 degrees in the last 100 yrs. But most of that warming occured from about 1880 and 1940 when the anthroprogenic contrubution to GHG's was little to none.
@patpilotglider Oh, and the record for the 21st century only spans 10 years so far, in that time, Phil Jones said in a BBC interview that there has been "no statistically significant warming". This, even though there's been a relatively big jump in Co2 measurements. Of course it's hard to get a statistically significant anything in a 10 year span. But the warming has stopped for the time being.
Russia dusts off old plans to open the Northeast Passage.
Pirates preying on Asia's sea links to Europe and the prospects of opportunities presented by global warming have prompted Russia to dust off some old plans that have been lying in filing cabinets since the collapse of the Soviet Union - opening the Northeast Passage for sea trade with Asia.
COASTAL AND OCEAN BIRDS MOST AT RISK FROM GLOBAL WARMING
Birds that rely on oceans and live on coastlines are more vulnerable to climate change than birds found in any other habitats in America, according to a new report released Thursday by federal biologists and other researchers.
11 Inches Falls in 24 Hours, Inundates Hillside Slums, Turns Roads to Rivers, Paralyzes Future Olympic City
RIO DE JANEIRO, April 7, 2010
(AP) The heaviest rains in Rio de Janeiro's history triggered landslides Tuesday that killed at least 95 people as rising water turned roads into rivers and paralyzed Brazil's second-largest city.
AGW religion and its reliance on CO2 is no different to Ozone (O3) and the scandal which continues to this day. The following graph shows no change in O3 levels despite a massive ban on CFC's (chlorofluorocarbons) after the Ozone hole discovery in 1985:
ww w. junkscience. com/Ozone/plot35910. gif
Will they ban CO2 fire extinguishers as they did BCF ones? You exhale 40,000ppm CO2 every breath (current atmospheric 388ppm), will they outlaw CPR and declare it attempted murder? Wake up people..
I checked the authenticity of the chart before I posted the link, and it DOES emanate from NOAA. I don't care what you think of the junk science site, however if you believe a single word on real climate dot org I also have a few Nigerian emails for you.. ;)
@MrOllyK I was referring to your your claim that Ozone was not a problem. You provided a graph of the ozone levels at the equator when the problem is the ozone hole over the south pole. Just google ozone depletion. Your polar site is out of date. The Antarctic ice cap is losing mass proof comes from measuring the surface height of the ice with Lidar and the bed rock base with radar giving the thickness of the ice.
So why should CFC's be selective and only attack ozone at the southern end, where temps atypical also occur at the northern end? In any case, there has been no ozone depletion where lives depend on it and, even in mid-summer you can't receive enough radiation at the south pole.
Antarctica losing mass? Have you weighed it recently? Sure it's not compressing? The chart is only out of date by a few months - look for a newer one if you like.
The antarctic ice sheets are deposited as snow, compress and slide over the land into the oceans over time such as glaciers do, eventually chunks calve and the cycle continues. However, reduced seasonal snowfall and high regional winds will ablate the snow and ice like Mt. Kilimanjaro was affected.
Ocean pH has already dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 & acid H+ ions are up +30%.
Sigourney Weaver narrates "ACID TEST: The Global Challenge of Ocean Acidification."
This NRDC documentary explores CO2 ocean acidification, which may soon challenge marine life on a scale not seen for tens of millions of years. The film originally aired on Discovery Planet Green.
On YouTube:
ACID TEST:
/watch?v=5cqCvcX7buo
&
'Avatar' Sigourney Weaver: Saving our Oceans - Earth Day 2010
Think about it, what are people saying? That until we started burning fossil fuels the earth warmed and cooled on its own and now for the last 100 years it has suddenly stopped doing it by itself and we are now suddenly causing it all by ourselves. Like it isn't supposed to warm and cool anymore, but should stay constant.
@johnba291972 Exactly. Seems a little retarded doesn't it.
I figure having a global "crisis" is a good way for politicians to start up a global government. I mean they seem to be constantly getting together to pass global rules about the environment. Interesting way to use environmentalism against the people.
@tiuric77 yes, you will probably find most of these politicians have shares and other involvements in all these green products and businesses that you get everywhere nowadays. This is probably why they use their influence to try and convince everyone of it.
convinced people = green products selling like crazy = value of their shares going through the roof
When people could do with putting their money to better use.
@johnba291972 I have nothing against green products if they are actually green. I mean no one wants to pollute on purpose. Regardless of climate change or not. That is common sense. However that has nothing to do with all this OMG THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END WE SHOULD ALL RUN AND HIDE UNDER THE GOVERNMENT'S DRESS. If your worried about climate change learn how to live in a self suffucient and sustainable manner. Don't rely on a banker turned politician.
His torpedoes are off target . For example his claim that temperatures have not increased recently (last 12) years. That it has increased should be obvious to all without resorting to any temperature sets. Some 90%+ of all monitored glaciers are in retreat. Both polar ice caps are are in decline. In my part of the world we have just had 123 days of daily temperatures exceeding 20 Degs Celsius, the previous record was 78 days. This is just the sort thing that climate change predicts.
@patpilotglider Don't you get it? He is not saying that climate change isn't happening, it is and it always has done. That's the point, We are not causing it. It is something that happens normally and has done since the beginning of time. What caused the ice age? What caused the ice age to end? Not us thats for certain.
The fact that humans had nothing to do with previous climate change events has nothing to do with fact that we are causing it now by increasing the amount of CO2 in the air. You can't just change the composition of the atmosphere and hope it will have no effect.
And how much co2 do you think humans put into the air?
It's 2.5% of the total amount, 2.5%. How does taking away at most 1% of this, cause the rest is impossible to take away, stop climate change?
It might slow down the changes by a miniscule fraction, but it won't stop something natural. Besides that, there is still no evidence of co2 being the cause of the warming
@patpilotglider Unbelievable. Did you even watch the video above?
It's like talking to one of those creationist ID-iots.. fanaticly repeating their mantra even if you smack them in the head with the actual evidence..
If you want to keep falling in line with all the other blind sheep and solve a not existing problem by reducing CO² emissions.. why don't you just do us all a favor and stop breathing? ;)
@patpilotglider , Yes there is change, no one is denying that, but the video, if you were paying attention, is that change, of the nature you describe is absolutly normal.
See how Koch Industries spent $50 million supporting "Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP)" and 40 other 'echo-chamber' organizations in the 'climate denial machine' as well as millions in Republican campaign contributions.
Jim Hoggan, author of 'Climate Cover-up", and Rachel discuss the oil & coal campaign, using 40 separate 'echo' organizations, to spew false & misleading propaganda about global warming.
MIT denier Lindzen told the BBC that ExxonMobil was "the only principled oil and gas company I know in the US" and that "they have a CEO who is not going to be bamboozled by nonsense."[19]
In a 2001 profile in Newsweek, journalist Fred Guterl wrote that Lindzen "clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He'll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking."[17]
It is good to see a properly constructed scientific response to the nonsense surrounding AGW. Prof Carter's final statements are absolutely true. We must prepare for any upcoming change in climate - warming or cooling - not try to prevent it. The idea that we can significantly change the climate is absurd.
Keep the science real - stop the religious zealots.
Billions are being poured into pushing the AGW agenda by government. The amount being funded by oil is a drop in the ocean by comparison. The truly ignorant don't bother pointing that out, and the reasonable consider it irrelevant, since no amount of propaganda money can change the actual facts.
125,000 years ago a +2C rise in global temps. correlated with a 6-9 meter (25ft) rise in sea levels.
For a clear assessment of the most recent Climate Change science watch:
FORA (dot) tv
Global Warming: How Policy Can Catch Up With Science, Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, 2/23/10 (Environment)
Dr. Michael Oppenheimer is Professor of Geosciences at Princeton University & was the Lead Author on the third and fourth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001 & 2007.
Bob Carter is also a stooge paid by Oil & Coal, the same as so-called "scientists" who were paid by the Tobacco industry for 40 years, telling us smoking was safe.
In March 2007 the Sydney Morning Herald reported Professor Carter said the role of peer review in scientific literature was overstressed, and whether a scientist was funded by the fossil fuel industry was irrelevant.
"I don't think it is the point whether or not you are paid by the coal or petroleum industry,'" said Professor Carter.
@goog2k oil and coal employ scientists wow really i never knew that, ok so thats out of the way. So global warming is real because you say so and because all men who work for oil companies are corrupt or lier's have you got a study to show this or is just a feeling like your science. Think with logic not your emotions.
@goog2k This is purile nonsense. Firstly, they are not the 'same scientists'. Secondly, science must be open for debates from all sides - otherwise it becomes a religion. Thirdly, insulting people who disagree with you will never win them round to your way of thinking.
You are making a hypothesis about AGW - you have to back it up with facts, not insults or false claims. You have to prove it. Prof Carter doesn't have to disprove it - but he clearly has!
@goog2k Then this is obviously a weird sided story, how the heck can a climate scientist be believed then to hear them say something that has to do with health.
If your going to say it that way, then it's obvious that we would think that it would make no sense. Then let's look at this in another way, then why can Al Gore a politician be believed then since he obviously makes speeches Global Warming, which is the job of a Climate Scientist who actually specialized in Climate Change?
punchville, why don't you tell us about the Permian extinction. Temps. spiked 10C (18F) and methane killed 85% of all life and 95% of OCEAN organisms.
There you go - its all about money and ruling the world.
They realise that its the new leading industry and they want it to control it, same as they run the banking industry.
There is already a green energy revolution - but its in the hands of the people and not the governments, which is why they want to set up Co2 trading so they run the show.
The next exonomic revolution will be in the consumers hands as econimics works best - dont let governments control it by Co2 trading schemes
allan, you show your utter ignorance again. T.Boone Pickens wants to invest over $1billion in windmills in the midwest but America doesn't have the smart grid infrastructure to get the power to the cities.
With the advancements in fuel cell technology we probably wont have a grid in the future. You silly fool.
With so much advancing in technology and so many unknowns why would the government invest in updating the grid when half the new green power ideas dont require it.
Personally i'd prefer farm land to be used for agriculture and not wind farming - there are far better ideas then wind.
@allanallanson Fuel cells could be a dead end as to the rare metals used in them. the energy crisis will come but the answer is no where to be found yet. Electric cars will push copper, lithium shortages, hydrogen cells will push peak Platinum also. we are left with bio fuels, wind, solar, nuclear, tidal, coal, and hydro. Wind and solar are not cost effective yet and i doubt they will ever be. so this list is pretty short for viable solutions. but I am hopeful we will find away forward
Do you think a $50billion investment in green energy would have helped improve sustainability?
Because thats what they wasted trying to prove Co2 is the casue of AGW - when they couldnt prove anything! They wasted our money & still want us to pay for Co2, after wasting $50BN proving nothing!!
So its really the global warming fucks who are taking money away from pro environmental budgets to pay for pointless research projects on Africans attitude to AGW & crap like that!
Old mate Bob Carter - and other internet sources.
Aside from that Gore is spending $300 million on advertising - maybe he could donate that to a green fuel research company?
When you add up all the grants, groups, research projects, satellite time etc its probably more.
To show how poorly the money is being spent - a research group was sent to Africa to determine the natives attitude toward AGW. The findings - Africans blame themselves for AGW.
Spend billions on research to prove Co2 drives climate, then tax everyone to reclaim the money to put back into sustainable projects, or
Just put the billions directly into sustainable projects without prooving Co2 drives climate - since we need to be more sustainable anyway.
Why not the second option? Becasue too many ex politicians and friends are so heavily invested in Co2 trading. They want to make money selling Co2. Fucking hypocrites.
Get your facts straight. There were separate mass extinctions at 260 and 65Ma, One of these involved impact of a meteorite (the one that killed the dinosaurs). The cause of the other at ~250 Ma is hottly debated but there is ample evidence of global cooling. Other possibilities include impact, volcanism, H2S emission...So which one do you mean?
The period 200 to 65 Ma was characterised by very high CO2, warm climate, and life thrived. Thats why dragonflies were almost as large as Eagles...
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
What no Scientist who studies global warming remembers is the term: Thermal Capacity --is the capacity of a molecule to store heat. It is also known as Heat Capacity. Carbon Dioxide does not possess the thermal capacity to enhance the green house effect that is produced by Nitrogen and Oxygen.
Thermal Capacity of Nitrogen is 1.0 w/ 780k ppm
Thermal Capacity of Oxygen is .9 w/ 209k ppm.
while CO2 has Thermal Capacity of .8 with only 387 parts per million.
But as already the presentation has showed you, it has been much more warmer in the past. And if only the Polar Bears could live in the areas of the ice, then we can conclude that there are other effects changing the amount of ice.
For example water currences and the amount of yearly snow.
I'm well aware of the old 'acidifying ocean' chestnut. It is enjoying renewed scare story popularity now that global warming has become satire.
Phytoplankton are one of the oldest forms of life on the planet, they have been around for billions of years and can handle a little pH variation perfectly well (otherwise they would not be here now)
Again Co2 is actually NOT high in geological history, it is very very low.
Bob Carter is a stooge paid by Oil & Coal, the same as so-called "scientists" who were paid by the Tobacco industry for 40 years, telling us smoking was safe.
In March 2007 the Sydney Morning Herald reported Professor Carter said the role of peer review in scientific literature was overstressed, and whether a scientist was funded by the fossil fuel industry was irrelevant.
"I don't think it is the point whether or not you are paid by the coal or petroleum industry,'" said Professor Carter.
Gook2g "In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain."
Oceans are alkaline, not acid. extra Co2 actually neutralizes the pH very slightly making it less 'bleach-like' As for the base of the food chain, keep going, what do plankton thrive on?
Global carbon dioxide levels is fixed by photosynthesis not manned: mankind just increased life on earth. He can't increase the level of carbon dioxide in the air
MyJonJonify 2 weeks ago
@MyJonJonify The IPCC wants atmospheric CO2 levels to be cut in half. This will take CO2 level far below what plans need to live.
Robbob9933 5 days ago
WE ARE NOT CATTLES ! WE ARE HUMAN!
ghostbison 2 weeks ago
Photosynthesis prevents any rise in free global carbon dioxide in the air
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
What a master of brainwashing... pure propaganda... really embarrassing...
frankobjectif 1 month ago
@frankobjectif I think he is whacked as well - but I like him.
ihelpearth 1 month ago
It years ago we had a bad hurricane year
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
It years ago we had a bad hurricane year
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
Biology metabolises all the carbon dioxide he can get. No change in free carbon dioxide for two centuries as a result. There is an increase in life
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
@MyJonJonify I'm a CO2 newbie, but I see charts that says it's rising, and rising at an in creasing rate...
ihelpearth 1 month ago
The last bad hurricane year was eight years ago. The world has been cooling for 13 years now. Looks so mean why carbon dioxide has nothing to do the weather. So you must be a paid nuclear stooge
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
Carbon dioxide fell at the end of the little ice age and has remained static for last two centuries
MyJonJonify 1 month ago
And all this before we had the Emails for CRU and climategate.
ZiderParty 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For anybody who believes,we have freedom of speech in Britain,should seriously
watch this video....
Check out the "official crown court papers" from the court case that lead
to me being the 1st ever british poet to be given a "5 year rap & poetry ban" (Video on my page)
"Donhonki" "First ever crown court BANNED british rap-poet" (2009-2014) #SuperInjunction
TheBannedPoet 4 months ago
thumbs up if you came here when u searched carter 4
DJCOYFISH 4 months ago
who cares what the politicians say. I prefer to look at the scientific debate. The peer reviewed scientific consensus is soundly in the 'how much does CO2 effect global temperatures" phase. Temperature carbon relationships are understood by a variety of scientific measuring methodologies, so pointing out a few badly placed temperature gauges proves nothing. Bob Carter you can fool a few naive viewers on YouTube but if you try and support it withe real evidence you are as phoney as Monckton.
richiesvideo 6 months ago
@richiesvideo "but if you try and support it with real evidence you are as phoney as Monckton."
If he uses real evidence he is phoney? What the...
If you disagree with the evidence, or think his reasoning is flawed, provide evidence that refutes his claims. If you cant, stfu
Binkophile 6 months ago
@Binkophile I don't think you understand the scientific process and the nature of peer reviewed science. Monckton is not a scientist. He doesn't understand basic science and confuses for example solar forcing and sensitivity in his talks.
"but if you try and support it with real evidence you are as phoney as Monckton." - this is just plain stupid. Yes you need to support a statement which is way outside the consensus with evidence. Imagine he said smoking didn't cause cancer with no evidence.
richiesvideo 6 months ago
@richiesvideo Sorry old boy, Jones lied, people died and Mann got his whitewash by an inhouse bunch of drinking buddies. Monckton is as fluent with the science as anyone on Youtube and I do feel he has you terrified.
aquartlow 4 months ago
@Binkophile Here's some "Peer Reviewed BS"
From the article “Peer reviewed “Study Linking Vaccines to Autism Is "Fraudulent"
"But it has taken the diligent scepticism of one man, standing outside medicine and science, to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud."
Yup 12 years later, and a outsider had to straighten out and expose the scientists fraud.
DaveGibbagglers 6 months ago
wow, tree huggers these days need to go out and get a life! no one cares about you and your conspericies! get out of your grandma's basement and make some friends!
craziguitarguy01 7 months ago
The reason why I find global warming to be so concurrent is because of the spiritual repercussions.
I hope Heaven is a real place unaffected by the universal cycle. Because if the entire solar system is entering a warmer section of the universe... what if your spirit lasts forever in the afterlife and what if your spirit can still feel pain and what if... the planet heats to unbelievably hot temperatures... Its going to like burning bones that dont die? I guess the pain will pass.
Unrealll6666 7 months ago in playlist ClimateGate
I had wondered why we are so pumped full of this global warming propaganda without any actual evidence for it. Now I understand why. Our own met office has key figureheads being funded to publish in its favor. As the met office is part of the ministry of deference it will be trusted and the government will go along with its own green taxes/carbon trading agenda. The BBC is unlikely to criticize as they are not scientifically savvy. And we are stuck with parliamentary idiot Chis Huhne!
27182818R 7 months ago
That was comedy right ??
barnns11 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For facts about Bob Carter, google:
Carter Confusion #1: Anthropogenic Warming
Carter Confusion #2: Green Jobs
After you've been alerted to his deceptions never believe him again.
pseudotruth 8 months ago
WOW - like many, I was beginning to believe in CO2 global warming....
Facts really take a beating when the mass of people, governments and journalists using social media focus on/or are given the wrong information. Social media seems to me like a global hive mind, a head full of thoughts competing and searching for the correct answers.
Unfortunately - If we were given the wrong information about global warming, its going to take years to filter through to change our social networked global mind.
mambos87 9 months ago
IF CO2 IS SO BAD WHY DO SCHWEPPES AND COCA COLA DISSOLVE MILLIONS OF TONNES OF IT IN FIZZY DRINKS EVERY DAY SO YOU CAN BURP IT OUT OF YOUR GOBS??
WHY DOES NO-ONE SPEAK OF THIS AS A HUGE CLIMATE 'CRIME' ???
ARE THEY BEING TAXED ON THIS OR IS IT ONLY FUEL BEING TAXED TO DEATH??
WHY WOULD THAT BE?
MAYBE 'COS IT'S ALL A LOAD OF BELCH... CO2 ISN'T CAUSING ANYTHING BUT INDIGESTION. TAKE A RENNIE... LET'S GET ON WITH EXERCISING AND PROTECTING WHAT LITTLE FREEDOM WE HAVE LEFT. EG: FREEDOM TO TRAVEL..
LipsOGonnaghan 9 months ago
@LipsOGonnaghan
carter has ties to corporate carbon industries and has never completed a study on how humans are warming the planet. I asked him. With a little research his history is telling. One of the best sites for a summary is good old Wikipedia. Here's an article that also helps.
Google: Refuting claims that climate forecasts are all up in the air
It is sad and immoral that the vested corporate interests are willing to sacrifice future generations for business-as-usual.
ReduceGHGs 9 months ago
@ReduceGHGs - It's sad that you are willing to sacrifice millions of lives and trillions in wealth for your political ego. It's sad that you completely ignore the role that politicians are playing as the DRIVING force in the religion of power that is global warming.
mpc91 6 months ago
New chant for deniers....
.
"Ignore the best, dig for the rest!"
.
Like thinning carter has anything meaningful to contribute. He doesn't. But to get to him you have to ignore the many, many very credible experts out there that have studies and respected institutions to back them up. Keep digging, you'll find carter under a rock slimed with vested interest goo. Those corporate interests care nothing for our future generations. They want carter slimed up and looking slick!
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
When Al Gore starts living and pretending there is a global warming crisis, perhaps then at least the fools could start believing him.
Theylivewesleep1984 11 months ago
Who funds Bob Carter? Ask before you take this tripe seriously!
johnedwards1968 11 months ago
@johnedwards1968
Hmmm....odd. When NGO's and various think tanks and universities made bold warmist claims re global warming I did not see you and yours rail about their addiction to taxpayer grant funding.
Follow the money.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
bob carter has NEVER completed or seen a study that has determined humans are not warming the planet or that continuing to add CO2 to the atmosphere is not harmful. I asked him last year and he said he didn't have a study. This guy is a marine geologist that studies PAST climates not how humans affect climate today or in the future.
But pleas, ask him and see for yourself.
bob.carter@ jcu. edu.au
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs Al Gore is a politician.
CokeSupply 11 months ago
@CokeSupply .
Wrong. Gore hasn't been involved with politics for many years.
If you'd like to learn with his activities are now, Wiki does a pretty good job of giving some detail.
What I don't recommed doing is relying on what Gore says. Read what all of our respected scientific institutions have been saying.
Certainly don't rely on bob carter. Even Wiki tell the story of his ties to corporate interests. Besides, he has no study to back up his claims. I asked him.
ReduceGHGs 11 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Al Gore runs an investment fund that invests in environmentally friendly technologies.
Do you think he has a vested interest?
You have been conned and fallen for it hook line and sinker. If you from the USA you will have enjoyed the lovely winter. Is cold weather due to warming as well?
arsjth 11 months ago
@arsjth .
Try an experiment. Imagine that Gore isn't and never was here. What are you left with? You still have the same well established science that Gore has been talking about. EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions concurs; we humans are warming the planet and the consequences are not good. Are they all wrong? Is it a global conspiracy? Come, let’s get real.
.
The last decade was the hottest recorded. Recent weather is not climate. Know the difference?
ReduceGHGs 11 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Google Global Warming Petition Project. There are more than 31000 more scientists who disagree with you and have every right to be heard and not censored.
This man Bob Carter has made some astonishing points. Are you prepared to say that every single he says is untrue?
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@GammaRay43 .
You apparently haven't researched the Petition Project (The Oregon Petition). Try doing so. It was corporate propaganda. I asked aurthor robinson, one of the "authors" of that nonsense, if he had a study to support their contention that humans are not warming the planet. He didn't of course. I also asked bob carter if he had a study supporting what he is talking about. He didn't either. These folks do not represent the state of current credible science. Try NAS and AAAS.
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Silly goose, there are hundreds of the IPCC that aren't even scientists and many who had to threaten to sue to have their names removed. Also, since the summary was issued first and then the report, one might sanely conclude that the evidence was made to fit the crime.
And it's a crime that you don't know who R. Spenser is.
And how about all those melting Himalayan glaciers? I guess the hack train engineer from India is in hiding since he was humiliated on that.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@GammaRay43 .
The reason you are no longer allowed to send me messages is because of your vulgar and nasty tone. Calling me names is poor support for your denial of climate change just as is using j. christy and r. spenser while ignoring what EVERY respected scientific institution has concluded.
So try to be nice or please keep your vulgarity to yourself. Perhaps that's where it belongs. That would be sad for you.
Learn about this issue.
Google: NAS pdf Climate Change 2008 Edition
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
oh dear......I called you a silly goose and you are weeping into your knitting. Good riddance. The world needs more men who can deal with the truth and you don't measure up I am certain.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@amaRay. Then there's people that think bob carter has something meaningful to contribute. Sorry, he doesn't. He is a marine geologist that has no study to back up his opinions. How would I know? I asked him. In addition he has industry ties. They aren't interested in anything but corporate profits, business-as-usual, without regard to what our future generations will have to pay.
Thanks for cleaning up your language! Still, you have no credible support. Why parrot the propaganda?
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Poor baby. All of Mr. Carter's data has been displayed by others on the case. And you find his scientific background offputting? You dunce. A cursory check on the pedigrees of the IPCC gang would make you blow your stack in outrage.
Have a nice day, but don't forget that you are on the losing side of the debate.
Peace
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Poor baby. The emperor has no AGW and you fear the truth.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@arsjth
Take note the religionistic nature of the warmist cult. Facts that rattle their premise are mocked and ignored.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
All through parts 1 through 4 Bob Carter has names of scientists and organizations that present these uncomfortable graphs and facts. If I can here him quote names and organizations, how can you not?
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@GammaRay43 .
As a layman, and clearly you are, how is it that you can judge the validity of what bob carter is telling you? You can't.
As for the IPCC, they reviewed hundreds of studies and found, FOUR times now, that we humans are warming the planet. This isn't news and they certainly aren't the only body of expertise saying it. EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions that studied the issue concluded about the same on the core issue. What more would a rational mind need?
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
Phil Jones wants to sell you some beachfront property in Arizona. He knows what a deep thinker you are and he also says his pal Micky Mann has some old ice hockey equipment he wants to sell you. They both need the cash since the river of milk and honey grant cash is drying up and they do need to hide the decline.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@GammaRay43.
Can't you come up with something less adolescent? How about attempting a real argument, you know, with evidence supporting conclusions? Need help with critical thinking?
We would talk about the IPCC and what they did but you won't listen. NAS, NCAR, AIP, AAAS, and all the other respected scientific bodies don't matter either do they? Why is that? Go figure.
ReduceGHGs 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs Speaking of core issues.... core samples from both Antarctic ice caps and deep sea bed samples conclude a 650-2000 year gap in CO2 levels and consequential temperature increase... this is documented in Nature, the peer reviewed journal fyi...
smokalot5100 9 months ago
@smokalot5100 .
Some “experts” use data like that to guide the layman down the wrong path. It deals with what some all the "lead-lag" issue. This is over simplified but… Natural CO2 buildup does appear to increase after temps increase. But keep in mind humans were not moving carbon to any degree during those times. Natural CO2 increases are certainly expected to again follow the temps we are driving up. That compounds the long-term problem. I'll send you a link to one of many sources.
ReduceGHGs 9 months ago
@ReduceGHGs Alright, sources are always nice... "Natural CO2 increases are certainly expected to again follow the temps we are driving up"... So you are saying that we are driving up temperature which is then driving up natural CO2... So if that is the case than your basically saying that global warming is not caused by man, but can be exacerbated by man adding more atmospheric CO2 after warming has already started? How is man alone then heating up the planet in the first place w/o CO2?
smokalot5100 9 months ago
@smokalot5100 .
I'm not making conclusions. What I'm saying is that you should read about this issue and learn what the experts say. I posted a couple links on your board but maybe you deleted them as they didn't agree with your predisposition?
Yes, anthropogenic warming is occurring as per EVERY ONE of our respected scientific institutions. EVERY ONE of them.
Do some reading if you really want to learn what the state of the science is. If you already think you know all about it, congrats.
ReduceGHGs 9 months ago
@ReduceGHGs - You're funny. You have no idea that mutual benefits to governments and "scientists" in promoting the global warming scam.
Governments need research to be air-tight, so to speak, to prop up their increased regulation.
"Scientists" need money to live, they get it from government grants and government universities. Those that disagree with global warming aren't treated as healthy skeptics, they're treated as heretics. They don't advance, and they aren't heard.
Follow the money.
mpc91 6 months ago
@CokeSupply
Al Gore is a crazed sex poodle.
GammaRay43 10 months ago
@ReduceGHGs
The IPCC is comprised with a melange of philosophers, geologists, acivists (with no degrees) non-climatology scientists. You accept them?
GammaRay43 10 months ago
Ok submit a science paper! Do not talk to non-science audience. Show courage and submit a paper to "Science" and "Nature". Stop being a PUSSY!!!
ironearth701 1 year ago
What is the truth
GMCAMUSICTV 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Greetings deniers.
GW predicts extremes
in the last year alone, Hottest temps in
NY, LA (power grid went down), London, Russia, Greece, Finland, Sydney, Melbourne, Pakistan, Chad, Niger, Sudan, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Myanmar, Ukarine and more
Coldest temps in... well there were no cold records set in 2010
Record temps in Greece (low pressure) are sucking the Arctic conditions south to the EU leaving a warm hole in the arctic
record floods: Pakistan, Australia, China, England
xtreme enough?
bernzeppi 1 year ago
9:10, dramatic zoom!
TheTempestFunk 1 year ago
Nice video. Very nice to watch a clearly spoken, non-emotional scientist, who isn't afraid of being labelled a 'GW denier'. In 5 or 10 years, there will be some other HUGE issue, and all the 'Chicken Littles' of the past 6 years or so, will have moved onto another more convient topic for saving the world with socio-economic 'falling skies', while conveniently forgeting how empassioned they have been with this topic.
jefcon3 1 year ago 4
Thank God someone has the passion and knowledge to show what an absolute scam global warming is. Our politicians as usual follow like blind mice taxing the hell out of us, And for what? Well done Bob Carter. It must be so frustrating trying to get your message across to the uninterested and ignorant.
andrechat1 1 year ago 18
Watch all parts of this debate on ABC watch?v=goDsc9IaSQ8&feature=youtube_gdata_player you will find there what a crock Bob Carter is
bernzeppi 1 year ago
Nice upload. Global Warming from the people who brought you War, on Global Terror or whathaveyou. Always fighting something with your trillions, these maniacs.
sxmadrid 1 year ago
Every icicle in Florida, another nail in Al Gore's coffin!
orthotox 1 year ago
Hey Bob Carter... How is it all three satellite data sets agree with the ground station measurements for global average temperature? No air conditioners in space.
robhoneycutt 1 year ago
Bob Carters presentation here is stupid. Temperature measurments all over the northern hemisphere are showing the same trends, the data from stations near cities AND from stations a long way outside the cities. GodAthie, do your homework before commenting. We have interglacial periods each approximately each 100.000 years, these are mainly due to changes in the earths orbit around the sun, the so called Milancovitch cycle, natural changes. These changes happen very very slow, and affects
bergiussss 1 year ago
@bergiussss temperatures. Whem temperatures increases, CO2 will naturally be released from the oceans, and amplify the temperatures increasement. This happens during periods of several 1000 years. Whats different now is that co2 concentrations is higher than it has been during the last 400.000 years, and it increases at an alarming pace, and acting as FAST FEEDBACK, wrather than a slow feedback mechanism. 97% of the scientists agree on anthropogenic CC, stop debating, and change your lifestyle.
bergiussss 1 year ago
Comment removed
bergiussss 1 year ago
Oh, and where is the event 800 years ago that caused 30% increase in CO2 recently? Hmmmmm?
bernzeppi 1 year ago 2
@bernzeppi You are confusing natural mechanisms with human mechanisms.
robhoneycutt 1 year ago
Hwzit goin deniers? Hottest day in NY, in LA (even taking out the electricity grid), biggest floods innPakistan, hottest day in London, record rain in sydney, fires in Moscow, record floods central Australia, hottest day fer the month very second month in Australia, frozen river in south America, record rains in queensland.... Any of these qualify for extreme events?
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@bernzeppi 'Records' and acts and god listed without resources or reference. Make an effort if you're trying to convince anyone that the earth is getting hotter in unpredicatble or unusual ways and that it is due to human activity.
sxmadrid 1 year ago
@bernzeppi You should learn the difference between weather and climate.
sparkloweb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i'm collecting info on various topics and thought people might like to see the vids on my profile about chem trails a.k.a. geo-engineering where you can find the links to the patents for these aerosols which are supposedly being used to cool the planet since the mid 1990s. There are also other asortments of youtube vids on miscellaneous topics
honestTom333 1 year ago
To those who feel strongly on EITHER SIDE: It's fair to watch this, AND Al Gore's movie.
Problem is, Gore's position appeals to the human psyche. It feels good to believe you're "part of the solution" every time you judge someone else for using the wrong kind of grocery bag.
Believing as I do, ALL of my friends think I'm conspiracy theorist brainwashed by big oil.
Believe me, I would feel a lot more comfortable and well-liked on the other side of the debate. I stand by what I see.
pburto 1 year ago
I really want to know. REALLY want to know. If you can predict the weather in 2015, 2035. WHY IN THE HE** can't the weather man get it right on the 3 day forecast?
Al Gore has made how much since he left office? If he REALLY saw that global warming is a farce, where or what is his next job? The IGNORING of empirical scientific facts that argue against you is about as bright as thinking your Superman and bullets won't hurt you.
OldGramps01 1 year ago
flagged for dangerous misinformation
aerobique 1 year ago
Brilliant!!!
FreeMason34 1 year ago
@FreeMason34
all lies, carter is a known "oil troll" and member of "rightwing" (corporate interests..) think tank
convenient LIES - nothing more... Dangerous stuff if you ask me..
aerobique 1 year ago
If he is really rational about this, he should be ready to eat his words in a decade or so. It is OK to pick on bad nuts among the climate research community but Bob draws generalizations without proof. I feel the whole debate went wrong. Too little discussion of the actual science. We need the modelers to speak up. Let's talk principle here, and then the data. First: What happens when you burn up in 150 years most of what took millions of years to form?
rewtnode 1 year ago
The most believable talk from a sceptic.
Still I'm dubious about him saying that global warming is normal because there is global warming a long, long time ago. He seems to say that there is global warming before therefore global warming now a natural cause. Doesn't seem logical to me.
mapflu 1 year ago
Thanks! Great video. Nicely summed up. I'm going to post this to all the global warming idiots I know.
monstrositylabs 1 year ago
one of the most spurious sets of claims that you can find. it's cooling? sure. but the weather stations are in chimneys? so which data set is he using? which data set shows cooling? nah, he didn't leave the graphs up for long enough. just show 1998 and pretend that everything is going down. i hope this oil and mining shill is running for cover in 2010 the way he should be. i hear he wrote some attacks on hansen. all he has left. cya, bob. better luck next time - you and the ipa should slink off.
batteries76 1 year ago
Excellent video, the politicians have no idea what they're talking about and they're furthering a cause which as this bloke quite rightly said, should be dead in the water.
caversmill 1 year ago
Great talk - thanks for posting.
MMGWsceptic 1 year ago
Global warming scam = just another way to fleece us, another tax, another form of control. Wake up world!
SoreSmokingMariachi 1 year ago 25
@SoreSmokingMariachi its not a scam why should it be a scam?
xtobiashansen 1 year ago
@xtobiashansen
It is a SCAM because trillion $ in carbon taxes are transferred from many pockets to a few.
jefri53 1 year ago
@SoreSmokingMariachi You think GW's a scam? This numbnuts just predicted another iceage. How expensive do you think dealing with that problem will be?
Even the few weak scientists you can buy for the denier side come off as wacky. There are hundreds of deniers who make fun of how a scientific consensus in the 70s was for global cooling (There wasn't), and the guy they get to defend their viewpoint is a global cooling advocate. The irony is hilarious.
johnedwards1968 11 months ago
@johnedwards1968 Oen your mind and review the science
edggii 11 months ago
Yet another NWO agenda around global warming extracting & scaring countries worldwide to pay carbon taxes on a natural cycle of the planet, education & common sense tells you pollution is a concern but cleaner energy & restricting deforestation,replanting trees is crucial.
realtimes1980 1 year ago
Very good presentation of the sceptical view. This is the first I've seen which isn't made by a collegestudent or a child who wants to keep his wellfare. However, I don't believe in Global Warming. I believe in Global Climate Change, and that's a big difference. As he said in the end; There IS a threat, and it can as much be a Global Cooling as an Warming. And it may even be both. When even a great sceptical says that, then you can't ignore it. We are facing great changes in climate.
GoSiv1 1 year ago
@droogish
look at the guys entire presentation... the climate change we are going through is small when we compare it to the past. even the peak tempatures themselves arent that low or high.
stop thinking about 100years and start looking at the thousands and millions cause then youll see what we do doesnt do a damn thing
GodAthie 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
bergiussss 1 year ago
Sorry I'm in the wrong blog. Due to global disruptions in our internet connections. Ontario is experiencing global lightning and global raining, so unlike the global drought predicted by global fat pig Al Gore. You'll notice he is suffering from global obesity and global horniness. Masseurs are at risk.
patioperson 1 year ago
Read the bible: Jesus says, I have not come to bring peace, I have come to bring the sword. Getting superstition out of the way, where was I?
You people seem to have a handle on this alarmism.
CO2 is less than 1% of the molecules of this atmosphere and there is no way that increasing CO2 from 400 to 500 parts per million is going to force the moderating effect of 190,000 ppm oxygen and 890,000 ppm nitrogen. But with this new science created by Al Gore, the earth could self combust.
patioperson 1 year ago
Like i have heard before, when the earth starts to cool ( it's only a matter of when) the cost to humankind will cost more in everthing. eg. crops not growing
sizercam 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warmist George Monbiot needs to lie to be credible. Compare paragraphs on these 2 sites containing "praised them to the warming skies".
`
climaterealists. com/?id=5843
`
sppiblog. org/news/a-preliminary-response-to-john-abraham-the-extremists-join-the-climate-debate-at-last-2
`
(remove spaces) If Monbiot (moonbat to us climate realists) needs to change Lord Monckton's writings to suit his agenda, then it shows how low warmists will stoop to peddle AGW. Pack of liars, right @Nightversionn?
MrOllyK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent article slamming realclimate. org (wishfulclimate. org) with many links to FACTS:
'
climatedepot. com/a/1742/Climatologist-slams-RealClimateorg-for-erroneously-communicating-the-reality-of-the-how-climate-system-is-actually-behaving--Rebuts-Myths-On-Sea-Level-Oceans-and-Arctic-Ice
'
(remove spaces)
MrOllyK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrOllyK
Excellent article slamming realclimate. org
I think you are refering to Roger A. Pielke here
and this is what he says:-
"the evidence of a human fingerprint on the global and regional climate is incontrovertible as clearly illustrated in the National Research Council report and in our research papers"
patpilotglider 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As the climate fear activists point fingers and regress into amusing rants, the evidence that the global warming fear movement is collapsing - abounds.
'
Excellent page with many links to climate FACTS:
ww w. climatedepot. com/a/2597/Exposed-Climate-Fear-Promoters-Greatest-Fear--A-Public-Trial-of-the-Evidence-of-Global-Warming-Fears-Inconvenient-Developments-Continue-To-Mount
'
(remove spaces)
'
It's an August 2009 article and therefore doesn't yet mention the Climategate emails.
MrOllyK 1 year ago
Co2 has increased by 4% in the 21st century yet still there has been no warming?
So Co2 increases by 4% but the temperature does not increase at all...hmmm... Imperical data vs. playstation models. CRU admits natural variation not included in early models...hmmm.. interesting. But that would mean my electric bill going up 150% just to enrich the government and goldman sachs and the CCX and not AGW!! What a shocker!! The most massive redistribution scheme in history. Bye bye world economy.
Frumibandersnatch 1 year ago
@Frumibandersnatch
Quote
Co2 has increased by 4% in the 21st century yet still there has been no warming?
End quote
So if that is the case how come the world temperatures are the highest on record for the last 12 Months !
Recognise the problem then fix it, don,t ignore it.
patpilotglider 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@patpilotglider re: temperatures are the highest on record for the last 12 Months ! Recognise the problem then fix it, don,t ignore it.
Yes, we have gone up 0.8 degrees in the last 100 yrs. But most of that warming occured from about 1880 and 1940 when the anthroprogenic contrubution to GHG's was little to none.
Frumibandersnatch 1 year ago
@patpilotglider Oh, and the record for the 21st century only spans 10 years so far, in that time, Phil Jones said in a BBC interview that there has been "no statistically significant warming". This, even though there's been a relatively big jump in Co2 measurements. Of course it's hard to get a statistically significant anything in a 10 year span. But the warming has stopped for the time being.
Frumibandersnatch 1 year ago
News…
Russia dusts off old plans to open the Northeast Passage.
Pirates preying on Asia's sea links to Europe and the prospects of opportunities presented by global warming have prompted Russia to dust off some old plans that have been lying in filing cabinets since the collapse of the Soviet Union - opening the Northeast Passage for sea trade with Asia.
VANCOUVER SUN
BRITISH COLUMBIA
CANADA
June 7, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Impacts of climate change in the news…
COASTAL AND OCEAN BIRDS MOST AT RISK FROM GLOBAL WARMING
Birds that rely on oceans and live on coastlines are more vulnerable to climate change than birds found in any other habitats in America, according to a new report released Thursday by federal biologists and other researchers.
SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
March 12, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
More impacts of global warming in the news
RECORD RAINS Flood Rio, Landslides Kill 95
11 Inches Falls in 24 Hours, Inundates Hillside Slums, Turns Roads to Rivers, Paralyzes Future Olympic City
RIO DE JANEIRO, April 7, 2010
(AP) The heaviest rains in Rio de Janeiro's history triggered landslides Tuesday that killed at least 95 people as rising water turned roads into rivers and paralyzed Brazil's second-largest city.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
AGW religion and its reliance on CO2 is no different to Ozone (O3) and the scandal which continues to this day. The following graph shows no change in O3 levels despite a massive ban on CFC's (chlorofluorocarbons) after the Ozone hole discovery in 1985:
ww w. junkscience. com/Ozone/plot35910. gif
Will they ban CO2 fire extinguishers as they did BCF ones? You exhale 40,000ppm CO2 every breath (current atmospheric 388ppm), will they outlaw CPR and declare it attempted murder? Wake up people..
MrOllyK 1 year ago
@MrOllyK
If you believe a single word on the junkscience site, I have a few emails from Nigeria that you might be interested in.
patpilotglider 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@patpilotglider "If you believe a single word on the junkscience site, I have a few emails from Nigeria that you might be interested in."
Don't tell me you actually sent them some money.
OvoidCranium 1 year ago
@patpilotglider
I checked the authenticity of the chart before I posted the link, and it DOES emanate from NOAA. I don't care what you think of the junk science site, however if you believe a single word on real climate dot org I also have a few Nigerian emails for you.. ;)
MrOllyK 1 year ago
@MrOllyK
What you don't get is that the graph fine but has no relevance to what is happening at the south pole.
patpilotglider 1 year ago
@patpilotglider
This is what's happening at the poles:
ww w. appinsys. com/GlobalWarming/GW_4CE_PolarIceCaps. htm
MrOllyK 1 year ago
@MrOllyK I was referring to your your claim that Ozone was not a problem. You provided a graph of the ozone levels at the equator when the problem is the ozone hole over the south pole. Just google ozone depletion. Your polar site is out of date. The Antarctic ice cap is losing mass proof comes from measuring the surface height of the ice with Lidar and the bed rock base with radar giving the thickness of the ice.
patpilotglider 1 year ago
@patpilotglider
So why should CFC's be selective and only attack ozone at the southern end, where temps atypical also occur at the northern end? In any case, there has been no ozone depletion where lives depend on it and, even in mid-summer you can't receive enough radiation at the south pole.
Antarctica losing mass? Have you weighed it recently? Sure it's not compressing? The chart is only out of date by a few months - look for a newer one if you like.
MrOllyK 1 year ago
@patpilotglider, the ozone "hole" isn't a hole at all, just a thinning:
`
ww w. junkscience. com/Ozone/ozone_seasonal. html
`
sppiblog.org/news/the-cfc-ban-global-warmings-pilot-episode
`
The antarctic ice sheets are deposited as snow, compress and slide over the land into the oceans over time such as glaciers do, eventually chunks calve and the cycle continues. However, reduced seasonal snowfall and high regional winds will ablate the snow and ice like Mt. Kilimanjaro was affected.
MrOllyK 1 year ago
co2 no dangeros, one three absorver carbone. but is best MOTOR MAGNETIC FREE ENERGY
!!
PeliculasIlluminatis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ocean pH has already dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 & acid H+ ions are up +30%.
Sigourney Weaver narrates "ACID TEST: The Global Challenge of Ocean Acidification."
This NRDC documentary explores CO2 ocean acidification, which may soon challenge marine life on a scale not seen for tens of millions of years. The film originally aired on Discovery Planet Green.
On YouTube:
ACID TEST:
/watch?v=5cqCvcX7buo
&
'Avatar' Sigourney Weaver: Saving our Oceans - Earth Day 2010
/watch?v=PGrCprVcHpQ
goog2k 1 year ago
Think about it, what are people saying? That until we started burning fossil fuels the earth warmed and cooled on its own and now for the last 100 years it has suddenly stopped doing it by itself and we are now suddenly causing it all by ourselves. Like it isn't supposed to warm and cool anymore, but should stay constant.
Are you kidding?
johnba291972 1 year ago
@johnba291972 Exactly. Seems a little retarded doesn't it.
I figure having a global "crisis" is a good way for politicians to start up a global government. I mean they seem to be constantly getting together to pass global rules about the environment. Interesting way to use environmentalism against the people.
tiuric77 1 year ago
@tiuric77 yes, you will probably find most of these politicians have shares and other involvements in all these green products and businesses that you get everywhere nowadays. This is probably why they use their influence to try and convince everyone of it.
convinced people = green products selling like crazy = value of their shares going through the roof
When people could do with putting their money to better use.
johnba291972 1 year ago
@johnba291972 I have nothing against green products if they are actually green. I mean no one wants to pollute on purpose. Regardless of climate change or not. That is common sense. However that has nothing to do with all this OMG THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END WE SHOULD ALL RUN AND HIDE UNDER THE GOVERNMENT'S DRESS. If your worried about climate change learn how to live in a self suffucient and sustainable manner. Don't rely on a banker turned politician.
tiuric77 1 year ago
His torpedoes are off target . For example his claim that temperatures have not increased recently (last 12) years. That it has increased should be obvious to all without resorting to any temperature sets. Some 90%+ of all monitored glaciers are in retreat. Both polar ice caps are are in decline. In my part of the world we have just had 123 days of daily temperatures exceeding 20 Degs Celsius, the previous record was 78 days. This is just the sort thing that climate change predicts.
I
patpilotglider 1 year ago
@patpilotglider Don't you get it? He is not saying that climate change isn't happening, it is and it always has done. That's the point, We are not causing it. It is something that happens normally and has done since the beginning of time. What caused the ice age? What caused the ice age to end? Not us thats for certain.
johnba291972 1 year ago
@johnba291972
The fact that humans had nothing to do with previous climate change events has nothing to do with fact that we are causing it now by increasing the amount of CO2 in the air. You can't just change the composition of the atmosphere and hope it will have no effect.
patpilotglider 1 year ago 2
@patpilotglider
And how much co2 do you think humans put into the air?
It's 2.5% of the total amount, 2.5%. How does taking away at most 1% of this, cause the rest is impossible to take away, stop climate change?
It might slow down the changes by a miniscule fraction, but it won't stop something natural. Besides that, there is still no evidence of co2 being the cause of the warming
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@patpilotglider Unbelievable. Did you even watch the video above?
It's like talking to one of those creationist ID-iots.. fanaticly repeating their mantra even if you smack them in the head with the actual evidence..
If you want to keep falling in line with all the other blind sheep and solve a not existing problem by reducing CO² emissions.. why don't you just do us all a favor and stop breathing? ;)
drhotert 1 year ago
@patpilotglider , Yes there is change, no one is denying that, but the video, if you were paying attention, is that change, of the nature you describe is absolutly normal.
aus2045 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT COOLING? LOL!!!
March was the HOTTEST March in the UAH 32 year satellite record.
UAH (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) is run by Dr. Christy, the well known AGW denier.
Global temperatures for February = 2nd WARMEST February in 32 years.
Global Temperatures for JANUARY = the HOTTEST January for UAH in 32 years.
HOT OFF THE PRESS - 4/10/10
See the latest delightful YouTube from greenman3610
Debunking LORD MONCKTON Part 1
/watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
goog2k 1 year ago
See how Koch Industries spent $50 million supporting "Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP)" and 40 other 'echo-chamber' organizations in the 'climate denial machine' as well as millions in Republican campaign contributions.
Jim Hoggan, author of 'Climate Cover-up", and Rachel discuss the oil & coal campaign, using 40 separate 'echo' organizations, to spew false & misleading propaganda about global warming.
Rachel Maddow: Oil & coal 'Climate Denial Machine' EXPOSED!
/watch?v=-ZFyH1BM9ec
goog2k 1 year ago
MIT denier Lindzen told the BBC that ExxonMobil was "the only principled oil and gas company I know in the US" and that "they have a CEO who is not going to be bamboozled by nonsense."[19]
In a 2001 profile in Newsweek, journalist Fred Guterl wrote that Lindzen "clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He'll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking."[17]
LOL!!!!
goog2k 1 year ago
It is good to see a properly constructed scientific response to the nonsense surrounding AGW. Prof Carter's final statements are absolutely true. We must prepare for any upcoming change in climate - warming or cooling - not try to prevent it. The idea that we can significantly change the climate is absurd.
Keep the science real - stop the religious zealots.
CombatRocks 1 year ago
@goog2k:
Billions are being poured into pushing the AGW agenda by government. The amount being funded by oil is a drop in the ocean by comparison. The truly ignorant don't bother pointing that out, and the reasonable consider it irrelevant, since no amount of propaganda money can change the actual facts.
davidxn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
125,000 years ago a +2C rise in global temps. correlated with a 6-9 meter (25ft) rise in sea levels.
For a clear assessment of the most recent Climate Change science watch:
FORA (dot) tv
Global Warming: How Policy Can Catch Up With Science, Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, 2/23/10 (Environment)
Dr. Michael Oppenheimer is Professor of Geosciences at Princeton University & was the Lead Author on the third and fourth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001 & 2007.
goog2k 1 year ago
Bob Carter is also a stooge paid by Oil & Coal, the same as so-called "scientists" who were paid by the Tobacco industry for 40 years, telling us smoking was safe.
In March 2007 the Sydney Morning Herald reported Professor Carter said the role of peer review in scientific literature was overstressed, and whether a scientist was funded by the fossil fuel industry was irrelevant.
"I don't think it is the point whether or not you are paid by the coal or petroleum industry,'" said Professor Carter.
goog2k 1 year ago
@goog2k oil and coal employ scientists wow really i never knew that, ok so thats out of the way. So global warming is real because you say so and because all men who work for oil companies are corrupt or lier's have you got a study to show this or is just a feeling like your science. Think with logic not your emotions.
glennimmortal 1 year ago
glennimmortal, there is science and there is propaganda. The tobacco industry told us for 40 years that smoking was SAFE (maybe even healthy, LOL!!!)
The same people, and some of the same "scientists" are now telling us there is no AGW.
Duhh???
goog2k 1 year ago
@goog2k This is purile nonsense. Firstly, they are not the 'same scientists'. Secondly, science must be open for debates from all sides - otherwise it becomes a religion. Thirdly, insulting people who disagree with you will never win them round to your way of thinking.
You are making a hypothesis about AGW - you have to back it up with facts, not insults or false claims. You have to prove it. Prof Carter doesn't have to disprove it - but he clearly has!
CombatRocks 1 year ago
@goog2k Then this is obviously a weird sided story, how the heck can a climate scientist be believed then to hear them say something that has to do with health.
If your going to say it that way, then it's obvious that we would think that it would make no sense. Then let's look at this in another way, then why can Al Gore a politician be believed then since he obviously makes speeches Global Warming, which is the job of a Climate Scientist who actually specialized in Climate Change?
larygary0822 1 year ago
allan, you're such a pathetic LIAR and you never provide a single source for any of your ridiculous claims.
Maybe because whenever you've given one it's always been from a neo-con propaganda mill funded by Oil & Coal -- just like Bob Carter.
LOL!!!
goog2k 1 year ago
punchville, why don't you tell us about the Permian extinction. Temps. spiked 10C (18F) and methane killed 85% of all life and 95% of OCEAN organisms.
goog2k 1 year ago
Deniers are helping to KILL America's chance to lead the new Green Energy revolution.
Whoever leads Green Energy will be the leader of the world's future economy.
goog2k 1 year ago
There you go - its all about money and ruling the world.
They realise that its the new leading industry and they want it to control it, same as they run the banking industry.
There is already a green energy revolution - but its in the hands of the people and not the governments, which is why they want to set up Co2 trading so they run the show.
The next exonomic revolution will be in the consumers hands as econimics works best - dont let governments control it by Co2 trading schemes
allanallanson 1 year ago
allan, you show your utter ignorance again. T.Boone Pickens wants to invest over $1billion in windmills in the midwest but America doesn't have the smart grid infrastructure to get the power to the cities.
JEEZ allan, you are a silly fool.
goog2k 1 year ago
@goog2k
With the advancements in fuel cell technology we probably wont have a grid in the future. You silly fool.
With so much advancing in technology and so many unknowns why would the government invest in updating the grid when half the new green power ideas dont require it.
Personally i'd prefer farm land to be used for agriculture and not wind farming - there are far better ideas then wind.
allanallanson 1 year ago
@allanallanson Fuel cells could be a dead end as to the rare metals used in them. the energy crisis will come but the answer is no where to be found yet. Electric cars will push copper, lithium shortages, hydrogen cells will push peak Platinum also. we are left with bio fuels, wind, solar, nuclear, tidal, coal, and hydro. Wind and solar are not cost effective yet and i doubt they will ever be. so this list is pretty short for viable solutions. but I am hopeful we will find away forward
glennimmortal 1 year ago
And dickhead -
Do you think a $50billion investment in green energy would have helped improve sustainability?
Because thats what they wasted trying to prove Co2 is the casue of AGW - when they couldnt prove anything! They wasted our money & still want us to pay for Co2, after wasting $50BN proving nothing!!
So its really the global warming fucks who are taking money away from pro environmental budgets to pay for pointless research projects on Africans attitude to AGW & crap like that!
allanallanson 1 year ago
allan, you're so damn ignorant it's a total waste of time.
But, please provide a source for your silly $50 billion rant.
goog2k 1 year ago
Old mate Bob Carter - and other internet sources.
Aside from that Gore is spending $300 million on advertising - maybe he could donate that to a green fuel research company?
When you add up all the grants, groups, research projects, satellite time etc its probably more.
To show how poorly the money is being spent - a research group was sent to Africa to determine the natives attitude toward AGW. The findings - Africans blame themselves for AGW.
Great use of US tax money
allanallanson 1 year ago 2
Whats smarter -
Spend billions on research to prove Co2 drives climate, then tax everyone to reclaim the money to put back into sustainable projects, or
Just put the billions directly into sustainable projects without prooving Co2 drives climate - since we need to be more sustainable anyway.
Why not the second option? Becasue too many ex politicians and friends are so heavily invested in Co2 trading. They want to make money selling Co2. Fucking hypocrites.
And you say i'm ignorant
allanallanson 1 year ago 2
@allanallanson Allan back off with the logic they don't get it
glennimmortal 1 year ago
Get your facts straight. There were separate mass extinctions at 260 and 65Ma, One of these involved impact of a meteorite (the one that killed the dinosaurs). The cause of the other at ~250 Ma is hottly debated but there is ample evidence of global cooling. Other possibilities include impact, volcanism, H2S emission...So which one do you mean?
The period 200 to 65 Ma was characterised by very high CO2, warm climate, and life thrived. Thats why dragonflies were almost as large as Eagles...
purchville 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEWS:
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
goog2k 1 year ago
We make 90 million tons CO2 each DAY. That's 3.4% of the natural production.
Atmospheric CO2 is rising 2ppm per year (0.5%), TWICE that of 50 years ago.
CO2 levels are 35% above the highest levels for 650,000 years.
50% of CO2 is dissolved in oceans.
In 30 years CO2 will reach 450ppm which most oceanographers warn will interfere with growth of calcium carbonate forming planktons and corals.
They make the base of the ocean's food chain.
Search:
NOAA, Trends in Carbon Dioxide
goog2k 1 year ago
Excellent lecture, I wish I could have been there in person. And, I shall Share this with all my open minded friends.
Siegetower 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What no Scientist who studies global warming remembers is the term: Thermal Capacity --is the capacity of a molecule to store heat. It is also known as Heat Capacity. Carbon Dioxide does not possess the thermal capacity to enhance the green house effect that is produced by Nitrogen and Oxygen.
Thermal Capacity of Nitrogen is 1.0 w/ 780k ppm
Thermal Capacity of Oxygen is .9 w/ 209k ppm.
while CO2 has Thermal Capacity of .8 with only 387 parts per million.
AtlasandLiberty 1 year ago
ARCTIC SUMMER SEA ICE MASS DOWN 62%+
Arctic summer sea ice surface area has dropped 36% from 8 million sqkm to 5.1 million sqkm since 1980.
Search:
Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth - Arctic Ice
Arctic ice THICKNESS has dropped 42% in just the last 5 years by satellite measurements.
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
That's OVER a 62% LOSS in arctic sea ice MASS.
Search:
"Lasers From Space Show Thinning Of Greenland And Antarctic Ice Sheets"
goog2k 1 year ago
But as already the presentation has showed you, it has been much more warmer in the past. And if only the Polar Bears could live in the areas of the ice, then we can conclude that there are other effects changing the amount of ice.
For example water currences and the amount of yearly snow.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
I'm well aware of the old 'acidifying ocean' chestnut. It is enjoying renewed scare story popularity now that global warming has become satire.
Phytoplankton are one of the oldest forms of life on the planet, they have been around for billions of years and can handle a little pH variation perfectly well (otherwise they would not be here now)
Again Co2 is actually NOT high in geological history, it is very very low.
Cambrian period (7000+ppm Co2)
GuybrushThreebwood 1 year ago
It's now been shown ocean acidification by atmospheric CO2 reduces the iron available for photosynthesis and reduces growth of phytoplankton.
Science, 2/5/10 - Effect of Ocean Acidification on Iron Availability to Marine Phytoplankton by Dalin Shi
Phytoplankton are the microscopic plants at the very base of the oceans food pyramid, providing food for all other ocean life.
Ocean thermal stratification is also reducing phytoplankton growth & uptake of CO2. Pedro Cermeño 12/23/08, Rutgers
goog2k 1 year ago
Ahhh haha Goog2k is resorting to the ocean acidification scare tactic.
Man you are pathetic.
Bob Carter has presented the best argument and here you still are crying like a baby spamming away to keep the boss happy.
Time for you to go back to the street corner with your cardboard sign telling everyone armageddon is here LOL
Fruit cake
allanallanson 1 year ago
Bob Carter is a stooge paid by Oil & Coal, the same as so-called "scientists" who were paid by the Tobacco industry for 40 years, telling us smoking was safe.
In March 2007 the Sydney Morning Herald reported Professor Carter said the role of peer review in scientific literature was overstressed, and whether a scientist was funded by the fossil fuel industry was irrelevant.
"I don't think it is the point whether or not you are paid by the coal or petroleum industry,'" said Professor Carter.
goog2k 1 year ago
Gook2g "In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain."
Oceans are alkaline, not acid. extra Co2 actually neutralizes the pH very slightly making it less 'bleach-like' As for the base of the food chain, keep going, what do plankton thrive on?
scientists call it Co2..
(warmy globey people call it pollution!)
any other scary stories?- melting Himalayas?
GuybrushThreebwood 1 year ago 2