Two thing Id like to say, firstly I think the rotary engine is a cool engine unfortunately EU l emission's laws seem to but an end to it all. but with modern engine technology im sure they could keep it alive and competitive. secondly its really cool to see bikes reviewed on Topgear in a professional manner. I'd like to see May and Hammond review one or two of the latest bike this season. Id also love to see how fast a superbike would lap the Topgear circuit. :D
the rotary wasnt very reliable thats why nobody bought them just like the rotary's in the old mazdas they where just plane junks. an old piston engine was way more reliable than the rotary. even with todays technology they wont use it it spins at very high rpms but dont have the torque of the piston motor. and they still have many problems one of wich is the cost to rebuild one of them is astronamical.
rotarys were always known for being a lot more reliable than piston-engines, it's just their short lifetime due to idiots who know nothing about how to treat them right - they gave them such a bad reputation :(
actually rotarys were very reliable back in the day and could stay at high rpms all day with out having valve spring damage and etc and when some thing goes wrong with a rotary there is only a couple faults with it and its the cooling seals and apex seals but what your speaking of is the oil crisis that almost killed the engine not the reliably
The 'old chap' presenting the Norton bikes is very good, very nice old school of radio and tv comunication sort of journalist. Top Gear in the nineties hasn't showed many bikes, has it??
i dont think wankels caught on because of marketing, and i think they are a higher cost to build as its a niche product, and oil consumption is quite high, but for a motorbike it would be great as the smoothness would be weird.
Im sure norton is bringing back their wankel, so they might still catch on yet!
@kassenz somebodie tell me that was a mafia with the petrol´s "god". because the rotarys engines was too much economic compsumtion. i read too that the rotarys need a extreme compression, like the 2t engines so, with a bad compression or sealed, the motor can´t start. (sorry my english)
Two thing Id like to say, firstly I think the rotary engine is a cool engine unfortunately EU l emission's laws seem to but an end to it all. but with modern engine technology im sure they could keep it alive and competitive. secondly its really cool to see bikes reviewed on Topgear in a professional manner. I'd like to see May and Hammond review one or two of the latest bike this season. Id also love to see how fast a superbike would lap the Topgear circuit. :D
MrDenniski 1 month ago
@kassenz because rotarys need a lot of fuel
InYourFACE6789 8 months ago
the rotary wasnt very reliable thats why nobody bought them just like the rotary's in the old mazdas they where just plane junks. an old piston engine was way more reliable than the rotary. even with todays technology they wont use it it spins at very high rpms but dont have the torque of the piston motor. and they still have many problems one of wich is the cost to rebuild one of them is astronamical.
breethwithme 1 year ago
Comment removed
purpleGoAhead 1 year ago
Comment removed
purpleGoAhead 1 year ago
@breethwithme you've got that a little wrong...
rotarys were always known for being a lot more reliable than piston-engines, it's just their short lifetime due to idiots who know nothing about how to treat them right - they gave them such a bad reputation :(
purpleGoAhead 1 year ago
@breethwithme
actually rotarys were very reliable back in the day and could stay at high rpms all day with out having valve spring damage and etc and when some thing goes wrong with a rotary there is only a couple faults with it and its the cooling seals and apex seals but what your speaking of is the oil crisis that almost killed the engine not the reliably
20bwannab 10 months ago
Is this really Top Gear?
The 'old chap' presenting the Norton bikes is very good, very nice old school of radio and tv comunication sort of journalist. Top Gear in the nineties hasn't showed many bikes, has it??
gs032009 1 year ago
no were very fuel hungry !
exilog 2 years ago
Did anyone notice the tail lights from the police bike were up-turned clusters from the Vauxhall Nova (Opel Corsa A)
cornflakes002 2 years ago
sachs rotaries for model pulling tractors.
12valvepower1 2 years ago
I LIKE MINIS
12valvepower1 2 years ago
i love wankel engines, great engines.
i dont think wankels caught on because of marketing, and i think they are a higher cost to build as its a niche product, and oil consumption is quite high, but for a motorbike it would be great as the smoothness would be weird.
Im sure norton is bringing back their wankel, so they might still catch on yet!
Buttmunch5000 2 years ago 2
why no bikes on top gear now?
exilog 2 years ago 2
@exilog we need whatever Clarkson has to say about British products, like a hole in the head!
rosiew600 1 year ago
I wonder why a rotary powered motorcycle never became mainstream much earlier. I think size/wieght ratio would make this a obvious choice.
Thanks for uploading!
kassenz 2 years ago 10
Yeah that's what I was thinking too.
FukU2222 2 years ago 4
@kassenz
or what about rotary powerd f1, besides the no refueling
Ninosilvio 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kassenz
or what about rotary powerd f1, besides the no refueling
Ninosilvio 1 year ago
@kassenz
Ninosilvio 1 year ago
@kassenz somebodie tell me that was a mafia with the petrol´s "god". because the rotarys engines was too much economic compsumtion. i read too that the rotarys need a extreme compression, like the 2t engines so, with a bad compression or sealed, the motor can´t start. (sorry my english)
2locma 1 year ago