The rpoblem with the Laffer curve is that right-wingers always assume that we are to the right of the peak. At the moment we are probably slightly to the left of it.
Further, tax cuts can lead to a rise in growth and a rise in revenue as a result of that growth as well as a result of less tax evasion etc. However that extra growth is often above trend and overheats leading to a recession. when grwoth falls back down, budget deficits then rise again. This happened in the UK in the late 80s.
there's no such thing as an "overheat" it is the basic business cycle the explains the "overheat". Booms eventually peak and then lead into recessions, when output begins to fall, along with demand...
"trend and overheats leading to a recession." It's the business cycle, but i do agree with ur assumption of the right wingers constant belief. During Recessions, revenues usually fall - this has happened in almost every major recession in American history...
may i remind you that deficits can be stopped by cutting spending? Ever take a look at the CBO historical tables? Domestic and Social spending far exceeded Reagan Defense Spending. Under Clinton we CUT domestic spending and the economy didn't contract...
Reason for the cut in revenue is that if tax rates are increased, there will be less incentive to work and more people will intentionally stay out of work as they believe they could possibly do better living on unemployment benefits. Therefore they are not working (consequentially not generating any revenue for the Government through Income tax for example).
Say you're a doctor, and you need to repaint your house. You can either hire a painter to do it, or you can take a week off from work and do it yourself.
But with taxes, you're making less money from your day job, and you also have to pay more for the painter.
In this way, taxes discourage people from utilizing their comparative advantages, as per specialization of labour, and thus inhibit the creation of wealth. Less created wealth means there's that much less wealth to tax.
I really liked your video and your channel. If you need any help getting this video or channel exposed I use a site called tubeviews.(net) It has really helped like 20 of my main videos get to the top in position. Its nice.
I really loved your video keep up the good work, do never, and I say Do NEVER GIVE IN, STAY IN THE FIGHT, THERE IS A LIGHT AT THE END oF THE TUNNEL. God bless.
Nice Video. I really liked your video youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have build 3 channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
@cravebabycrave08 ya lol cuz this is so good for Advanced Placement Econ even though this is a basic basic explanation of the laffer curve. Thanks holden!
Glen Beck uses a chalk board. Bullshit is bullshit.
Coklan 1 year ago
very easy to understand explanation, thanks! definitely helping towards my A2 economics revision!
shutupcaf 1 year ago
oh great! :) thank you
Balkance 1 year ago
The rpoblem with the Laffer curve is that right-wingers always assume that we are to the right of the peak. At the moment we are probably slightly to the left of it.
Further, tax cuts can lead to a rise in growth and a rise in revenue as a result of that growth as well as a result of less tax evasion etc. However that extra growth is often above trend and overheats leading to a recession. when grwoth falls back down, budget deficits then rise again. This happened in the UK in the late 80s.
slimes23 2 years ago
there's no such thing as an "overheat" it is the basic business cycle the explains the "overheat". Booms eventually peak and then lead into recessions, when output begins to fall, along with demand...
albertsamerica 2 years ago
I'm afraid there is. Look at the late 80s or the results of the Barber Boom.
slimes23 2 years ago
"trend and overheats leading to a recession." It's the business cycle, but i do agree with ur assumption of the right wingers constant belief. During Recessions, revenues usually fall - this has happened in almost every major recession in American history...
albertsamerica 2 years ago
Yes I know. But it's much more pronounced when a nation has hidden its structural deficit underneath a boom as Reagen did in the 80s.
slimes23 2 years ago
may i remind you that deficits can be stopped by cutting spending? Ever take a look at the CBO historical tables? Domestic and Social spending far exceeded Reagan Defense Spending. Under Clinton we CUT domestic spending and the economy didn't contract...
You hate deficits, stop spending money...
albertsamerica 2 years ago
i always used to put tax rate on x-axis and revenue on y-axis.
and remember reading somewhere that the perfect tax rate would be around 60%
blandiloquence 2 years ago
Nice relationship explanation... But i was looking for the reason in cut in revenue actually...
MASTERCHEATER90 2 years ago
Reason for the cut in revenue is that if tax rates are increased, there will be less incentive to work and more people will intentionally stay out of work as they believe they could possibly do better living on unemployment benefits. Therefore they are not working (consequentially not generating any revenue for the Government through Income tax for example).
Hope this is of help.
VPMusiconline 2 years ago
Say you're a doctor, and you need to repaint your house. You can either hire a painter to do it, or you can take a week off from work and do it yourself.
But with taxes, you're making less money from your day job, and you also have to pay more for the painter.
In this way, taxes discourage people from utilizing their comparative advantages, as per specialization of labour, and thus inhibit the creation of wealth. Less created wealth means there's that much less wealth to tax.
PanzerDivisionBOM 2 years ago
Do you have any idea yourself of what that perfect tax rate is? Are we too high, too low, or just right?
RadioFreeWisconsin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I really liked your video and your channel. If you need any help getting this video or channel exposed I use a site called tubeviews.(net) It has really helped like 20 of my main videos get to the top in position. Its nice.
I really loved your video keep up the good work, do never, and I say Do NEVER GIVE IN, STAY IN THE FIGHT, THERE IS A LIGHT AT THE END oF THE TUNNEL. God bless.
Corbinwer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video. I really liked your video youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed check out this site called tubeviews [dot net] It has really done wonders for me, I have build 3 channels up with videos at top in position and this is my forth channel i'm going to working on.
thanks for sharing good stuff man
Brookedch 2 years ago
Schiff owns Laffer
Mediterraneanblue9 2 years ago
Great review
Well explained and concise
yet another great video
redreaper123 2 years ago
I think it worked perfectly as a review - especially for AP Macroeconomics students.
cravebabycrave08 3 years ago 3
@cravebabycrave08 ya lol cuz this is so good for Advanced Placement Econ even though this is a basic basic explanation of the laffer curve. Thanks holden!
vertexclimber 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah that was bad. Needs a little work.
clint8200 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Very superficial, you didn't even explain why revenues fall after a certain percentage!
You should talk about tax basis... what happen to the latter when tax rate exceeds the optimal level!?
keep trying...
WisdomVoice 5 years ago