there was a sonja schmidt who was an east german singer in the late sixties; who did a commercial for the trabant automaobile, if you want to see where America is headed , look up trabant, and see the apex of communist technology. - Solidarnosc!
LOL The video is funny. So are the responses. I like the part when the girl says, "It's not socialist. If this was a socialist thing, it would be a nationalized healthcare." And when the other girl responded to the idea that socialist countries pay 60-70% taxes, "Yeah, but even they get health care!"
BTW, for all the confusion, Republican and Democratic parties have always been switching sides since the country was founded. Check out the writings of the founding fathers.
@funkbrother216 How is it doctored? Its just short segments of previously seen interviews ??? Next youll say they didnt say those things and that sonja is a pro puppet master .DER Your just like the other leftabots you attacks things but cant show people why its wrong ? Look in the mirror ....YOU ARE WRONG !
@stevenpaddybwoy Sonja had only selected the segments that best fit the narrative of how much more informed and honest the opponents of health care reform are than the advocates. She did not select the advocates who made the best arguments. She certainly isn't obligated to present both sides fairly, but lets not pretend as though she is. You remember those Tea Party clips that single out the racists and pass them off as the norm?
It's sad that the revolutionaries have become the establishment. They thing that they are fighting for justice peace and equality. In reality they are just fighting to maintain the status quo. They are led like sheep by professional protesting organizations. Their sole purpose is to further their own agenda. I wonder who paid to have those shirts made and those signs printed? Wait a minute....It all makes sense to me................................................................................
In 1971, GOP President Nixon naming drug abuse as Public Enemy #1. In a free society, people own themselves and the shit that they make and trade, and are free to do that as long as they don't hurt others or cheat other people. Possession laws are of the same premise whether it be dope or guns. Both sides need a careful look.
These socialists want their government to tell them what to think, how to think, when to think, when to speak, eat, sleep, and shit. But never learn, just like always.
Being a racist means that you believe that the race that you belong to or are affiliated with is superior to another or others. I have yet to meet one black american who has that view. The word you Dumbfukistanians are looking for is bigot, not racist. Stupid fucks.
It was racist conservatives that founded the KKK. You people are so fucking retarded it is not even funny. The conservatives of the civil war era were for "state's rights" which meant that they were for the ownership of slaves as a right given to a white citizen by their state government. It doesn't matter if there is a (D) or an (R) in front of their name, conservatives have been the anti thesis to black progression and true equality.
@ultraDoogishone Sure, us conservatives are racist. Explain this, I am a southern white conservative christian male. My daughter is dating an african american boy, and I am pushing for a GOP Presidential ticket that has Herman Cain and Col Allen West (both men of color). I was once arrested for beating up two white dudes for pick on a black dude. Does that sound like a racist to you. Why did progressives remove black revolutionary war heros from our history books if they are truely progressive?
@ultraDoogishone You have been bamboozled into believing the left stands for tolerance, when in reality they only believe in tolerance of their own belief system. That is why any free thinking black person is labeled an Uncle Tom Oreo for having the audacity to think for themselves. You sir are blinded by your 'religious faith", i.e. political views!
@SuperSoccer456 How? The progression of blacks out of a position of being jailed at a higher rate than educated is not a leftist bamboozlement. I meant what I said ( It doesn't matter if there is a (D) or an (R) in front of their name....) Anyone who opposes change when change is necessary to end that situation is diametrically opposed to what I stand for Liberal or Conservative.
Its never fair to ask democrats protesting in public what the issues are or how things will work, uniformly they don't know wtf they are babbling about.....but they know liberal talking points!
"STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
I'm a part-time cashier in Mississippi working for a small chain of stores and now have health care insurance after one year on the job. I earned it... so can you. This wasn't "given" to me.
"Other countries have health care" ?!!!! 8:20 What ?! We have the NHS in UK. like many other Brits who pay Tax and N.I I had to go overseas for treatment and pay again WHY WHY would my wife have to travel to Japan to pay for PROPER treatment when we have "free" health "care" in Britain?? Why does Japan the US develop the mosy advanced medical treatments. You may have problems with your system . But for your and your loved ones sakes DONT think we are a model
@WingZero75 you're not retard. if you pay taxes, you are paying for your own medical care. that's what taxes are for. but I guess if it was up to you you would want to cut the EPA, fire department, department of defense, the police, department of health etc.
“Political tags–such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth–are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”
Wah wah wah! Gimme, gimme, gimme! What a bunch of petulant whiners. I'm tired of trying to be civil; if you're a hardcore liberal, you're a goddamn idiot. Go move to Venezuela, I'm sure you'll love it there.
First of all its ok to left or right leaning. Thats one reason why America is well... America. What i don't understand is why there are black, gay or Hispanic "republicans". not that you cant think the same way on certain policies but the guys in charge of the GOP DO NOT like you. Never have and may never will. BTW every poll done on fox viewers have proven that they know nothing of the facts... even the facts that favor their point view.
Kind of funny, especially since it was the Republican party that abolished slavery, desegregated schools, gave blacks and women the right to vote, and passed the civil rights act.
It was the democratic party that.... founded the KKK.
Which means it was the Republican party that killed 600,000 Americans, destroyed States' Rights, got us gay marriage, women in combat zones, and everything else that came about thanks to the precedent set by the "civil rights movement".
(Having seen what blacks and women have chosen to do with their votes, I have to wonder if it was such a good idea...)
I fail to see it "cutting", as I agree with all of the above, with the exception of 600k americans dead.. and that you can lay at the feet of the slave states for seceding the way they did. There is nothing saying you can or cannot leave the Union in the Constitution, which means that decision belonged to Congress before they jumped one way or the other. They forced the issue by declaring independence and gave Lincoln the ability to set precedent... and now no one can go.
Not Congress's choice, it's the individual States' choice whether to leave the Union or not. A foreign military force was occupying a Confederate fort. They should have surrendered the fort.
600k dead I lay at the feet of Lincoln and the "progressive" party of the era.
And, yes we can go. That bit in the pledge doesn't change what the DoI said.
You're wrong. First off, the Declaration of Independence isn't a legally binding documented ratified by the US government, it was a document that was signed by the continental congress before the USA existed.
Second, even if it was ratified by the US gvt, there is nothing in it saying a State has the right to secede from the Union. As i said before, there is nothing in the Constitution saying a state CAN or CANNOT secede.. because of that, its up to CONGRESS, not the states.
Forgetting for the moment that the US government assumed responsibilities for the revolutionary government, it doesn't change the PRINCIPLE expressed in the DoI.
Either the Confederate States had the right to secede from the Union, or the colonies did NOT have the right to secede from Great Britain.
So, when the Tommys march on Washington next week, you instruct your representative to surrender to them, because we were wrong to secede from Britain.
@Hiraghm No, the US Gvt did not assume responsibility, the continental congress (CC) was a transitionary gvt until the first true US Gvt was duly elected by individual states. They didn't just say "We won the war, we're the US guv now".
2nd, the CC tried very hard to reconcile with Great Britain before finally declaring independence, no such thing happened with the southern states. there is also no parallel between the southern states seceding and the CC declaring independence from britain.
@antipryzm Not only is there no parallel, but its totally opposite. Thanks to the 3/5th compromise, southern states had MORE than their fair share of government representation, but they still didn't get their way and decided to leave. Show me one point made in the DOI for independence that mirrors the southern states "problems". There are none. So NO, the DOI does not enter into this argument at all.
The 3/5th compromise was 80 years before secession.
You asked for it...
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism," The constant attempt to deprive them of their property and livelihood.
@Hiraghm I saw no attempts to deprive southern states of property or livelihood, our opinions and interpretations of events will just have to differ there.
the northern abolitionists, with the tacit approval and assistance of the federal government, were constantly helping with and agitating for the escape of slaves. With the loss of slaves, the economy is damaged, and people have lost their property.
@Hiraghm Does it matter when the compromise was? It was still in existence and use in the 1860s. "three-fifths of the population of slaves would be counted for enumeration purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives"
meaning that slave states had far more than their share of representatives in congress. Time and again you can see northern states backing down so the southerners wouldn't throw a fit.
""He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands. ""
"He has obstructed the administration of justice" by supporting the escape of slaves from slave States.
"He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature."
@Hiraghm ""He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; " in no way applies to the south.
""He has obstructed the administration of justice" by supporting the escape of slaves from slave States." federal troops routinely returned escaped slaves to their owners during the war, and slavery itself was still legal in the northern states.. the Emancipation Proclamation only freed CSA slaves.
"He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power. "
"For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: "
Fort Sumter
"He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: "
"For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world: " Granted, this was merely attempted by the feds.
@Hiraghm Large bodies of troops were quartered on federal land, owned wholly by the US government, and given to the US government freely by the government of South Carolina.
"That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Either that applied to the Confederate States, or it did NOT apply to the colonies.
@Hiraghm You conveniently forgot the preceding portion.... that ALL men are created equal and are afforded the Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The abolitionist-republican government was hardly destructive of those ends. Therein it did not apply to the southern states wishing to maintain slavery.
The abolitionist-republican government wanted to end slavery... yesterday if not sooner. That would have destroyed the economy of the Confederate States, which certainly would have infringed upon their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The men who wrote those words also held slaves. So, that argument is irrelevent.
Surely I recall the early U.S. gov't assumed the debts for the war, but that's irrelevant.
Yes, just ignore the 20 years prior to the Secession War, which involved as much reconciliation as did the period preceding the War of Independence. The New Englanders were vehement about separation from England.
You're right; the southern States had MORE right to secede, being sovereign republics in their own right, not colonies or provinces.
@Hiraghm New Englanders may have been vehement, but they continued to allow Cont. Congress to try to reconcile until King James declared them all traitors, King James forced their DOI and forced the war. The US didn't force secession or the war. Don't forget that New England was vehement about secession from the US over the decision to declare war on England a 2nd time.
Again, the States had rights to secede, whether they did so properly is opinion, but they then declared war and lost.
I know very well what you were referring to, and again those same new englanders were vehemently against war with britain a second time, even threatening secession.
@antipryzm "STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
And you have an interestingly totalitarian view of the Constitution. Perhaps you grew weary and stopped reading before you reached the 9th and 10th Amendments...
(Then, of course, there's the 2nd Amendment, which is specific on the subject of States ability to resist federal tyranny. )
@Hiraghm First off, the word 'federal" doesn't appear in the 2a, the right is for the people to resist tyranny from -anyone-.
Second, you're under a misapprehension that I'm against a state's right to secede. I'm not, you're just under a misapprehension and I'll correct it for you. Fort Sumter was FEDERAL property, South Carolina started the war by (1) demanding US troops leave US property (2) blockading US property (3) shelling/invading US property... CSA started the war, and lost.
Anyone... including and especially the federal government. There's what it says, and why it was required by some of the Founding Fathers.
Fort Sumter was on S. Carolina land. No sovereign republic can tolerate a foreign army on its soil without its consent, which S. Carolina withdrew.
No, people who think like modern liberals started that war. They had no concern for the well being of their countrymen; their fellows thought and lived differently than they approved...
@Hiraghm "including and especially the federal government" That's an assumption, it can just as easily refer to the government of individual states.. or have you not noticed State gun legislation in blue states lately?
Ft Sumter was not South Carolina land, again, it was given freely by the government of SC to the feds, thereby making it federal land unless/until the US Gvt chose to return it. It is the same justification used for our continued occupation of Guantanamo Bay.
No it cannot, because the word used isn't "state", it is "State". When the Constitution capitalizes the word "State", it is referring specifically to a member republic of the Union.
On the contrary; Gitmo is the result of a treaty between the U.S. and Cuba, and we *lease* the base. Cuba disputes the legality of the lease, but inter armes silent leges.
@Hiraghm You make my case for me. Cuba freely gave the US Gitmo, via treaty. We have not broken the terms of that treaty, and until we do there is no justification for returning Gitmo to Cuba, nevermind a government change.
@Hiraghm If you sell me a square mile of land, and then sell all the land surrounding it to someone else, my property does not automatically become his if he says so. I would have to give it freely, or he would have to take it by force and HOLD on to it.
The CSA seceded, then declared war, and was unable to hold onto land they had taken by force. As simple a matter as that.
"On December 26, 1860, six days after South Carolina declared its secession, U.S. Army Major Robert Anderson abandoned the indefensible Fort Moultrie and secretly relocated companies E and H (127 men, 13 of them musicians) of the 1st U.S. Artillery to Fort Sumter without orders from Washington, on his own initiative."
From Major Anderson's standpoint, he was merely moving his existing garrison troops from one of the locations under his command to another. He had received instructions from the War Department on December 11, written by Major Don Carlos Buell, Assistant Adjutant General of the Army, approved by Secretary of War John B. Floyd.
Washington did no such thing. However, there's plenty of proof that the CSA occupied federal land and stole federal property.
You conveniently ignore the fact that the CSA fired upon USA troops on US soil, thus starting a war. You also ignore the fact that the CSA had no international recognition as a sovereign body. And no, you are not a sovereign country without international recognition.
Screw international recognition; a State is a sovereign republic. Even the Constitution recognizes this. We are a union of *nations* not a union of provinces. Correction... were...
The CSA gave them the chance to surrender their fort before firing upon them. The "mere" movement of troops was in anticipation of possible secession.
Sorry, ultimately, you're wrong. Each State has... correction, *had* the right to leave the union. Anything less is slavery. Yes, I relish the irony.
...and therefore any evil, no matter how vile, could be done to them in good conscience. It is the justification for the horrors communists have perpetrated upon the world since the Russian revolution.
Facts and reality be damned, in the crusader's eyes.
@antipryzm "STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
@toothpickdinner Rush and Beck aren't politicians, they're private citizens who only hold "power" as media morons, I could give two craps if they are racist or not. I'm sorry your opinion of a whole demographic of a political party is based upon the Right's version of Jon Stewart. As for Sarah Palin, find me some quotes of her being a racist. Last I checked, she's a spearhead of the Tea Party so the libs will use every weapon (especially the RACIST nuke) to undermine her. You're the racist.
Beck is a racist? Really? Have you ever watched his tv show or listen to his radio show? Try it sometime, instead of listen the hype the MSM feeds you. Used to be in your camp, thought all repubs were evil racists, until I decided think for myself. If Beck is a racist, why did he have a show dedicated to all the Black Revolutionary War and Civil War heros who have been omitted from the history books back in the 1920's under the Wilson Adminstration.
@SuperSoccer456 Beck is a racist. I listened to his show that you mentioned. Patronizing looks at shit that should be taught in high school, but is only really taught in liberal Universities and Black colleges is not proof that his everyday topics are not at the very least weighted heavily with topics regarding minorities. In a nation with the majority being white, why does he talk of colored folks so much?
Yet the parties haven't reversed at all. Go read your history and realize the Republican platform has remained the same. Its the democrats who went from racist oppressors to minority pandering. Which, in my eyes, is the same exact thing.
as a black woman i have to say that its people like you(who know nothing) that are destroying this country. as a tax paying citizen it offends me that people like you get bussed to the polling station to punch a "straight demo" ballot during election season. because i am black am i not allowed to use my brain to decide that the republican party holds more closely to my own values and morals? am i to blindly vote demo because of the color of my skin?
@cassandrad Didn't you know that if you are Black & don't support the Dems, you are suffering from Stockholm syndrome? Jeneane Garafalo said so.
Look, when have Repubs, or conservatives ever call Black members of the Democrat party "Uncle Toms", "Oreos", etc? Never. The focus on race comes far more from the Left.
I want free cheeseburgers and sex with beautiful big-busted blondes... doesn't mean that, just because I want these things, my fellow citizens are under any obligation to provide them...
You know, when I here these smarmy, rat bastard, ass clown, left wing loon, liberal, progressive/socialist/Marxist son's a bitches, I just want to puke.
How did we ever get a population so brain dead? Their ignorance is only surpassed by their juvenile arrogance!
These un American traitors just need to be bitch slapped into next week!
I just love the way they read your comment here and then try to "engaged" you in debate?
@GutpileCharlie Yah! Down with the commie DPW run by the state! DOwn with the commie education system run by the state! The Police and fire stations are run by the state! Forest and recreation comission are state run! IMMIGRATION OFFICE IS STATE RUN THEY MUST BE COMMIES!
@GutpileCharlie The thing with liberal scum is that their whole empty little lives are all about being a smart ass and smarmy. They believe that by being a smart as that makes them clever. They are empty soulless little ghouls who derive a sado-masochistic type of satisfaction from being contemptiious of anything that has a level of civility to it.
@DrewDubious You stupid little asshole. Police and fire are in fact run by the state NOT BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, BUT YOU COMMIE LIBERAL SCUM REFUSE TO BE ABLE TO DISCERN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO. The reason for that is because you worthless little assholes have no control over your own little worthless lives so hence you want to control the lives of people you dont know. You dont know logic if it slapped you across your shit eating little face.
The gov already runs healthcare for the military. Hawaii has had state run healthcare for 40 years. Does that mean we have communist soldiers and a red state in our midst?
"The gov already runs healthcare for the military. Hawaii has had state run healthcare for 40 years. Does that mean we have communist soldiers and a red state in our midst?"
No it means we have prime examples of what happens when citizens regulate a healthcare systems so that corporations wont take over and mess us over. But people are blinded by people like Sarah Palin.
@ThunderAppeal riight. You missed my point, or just chose to ignrore it completely. Not to mention the hypocricy in your statement "If hawaii wants to have it's own state run healthcare thats the states perogative". Now, again, is Hawaii a communist state since it has state run healthcare?
@DrewDubious The only point is the one one your head dipshit. I'll spell out for you AGAIN because it is clear that you have a reading comprehension problem as most liberals do. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STATE RUN PROGRAMS AND FEDERALLY RUN PROGRAMS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SOLDIER AND A CITIZEN. Because of your stupidity and reading comprehension problem you are unable to tell the difference between the two.
@ThunderAppeal By the by, for a peace loving type who claims to have respect for all humankind you sue do talk funny. I think it's the insults that threw me. Now, try that again with some self control and a little respect if you would please.
5:10 Has that women ever been to Russia or China or any other 3rd world country? Socialism really sucks for a good portion of those countries. You have pockets of 1st world country status cities, and a crapload of 3rd world country surroundings.
7:20 "They're just mad b/c he's black and he won". Well if that isn't the most racist statement of the year, I dont know what is. Bringing up the fact that he's "black" already qualifies you as a racist; if no one else said it, why are you?
@theaznfishy "They're just mad b/c he's black and he won". Well if that isn't the most racist statement of the year, I dont know what is. Bringing up the fact that he's "black" already qualifies you as a racist; if no one else said it, why are you?"
That is some messed up logic... It might be ignorant and self serving, but racist? racist against whom? Mebee if only whites voted against obama.... but obviously that is not how it went down...
1 yr ago Oregon had Senators in each county on the issue, the socialist bused in immigrants for amnesity literally duck taping paper with messages on the front and back of their shirts. Some were not even 18..they had no clue why they were their but they got some benefits from doing this which is Sal A RULES FOR RADICALS.
watermelonygoodyness.cbs is not a reliable news source just look at dan rather. i agree that the military is socialized but absolutely needed. i have served in the us navy and it is a volunteer choice.
The man at 4:11 is not misinformed. CBS did do a poll that showed 72% of Americans view a public option preferably. That woman was correct that the health care bill gives no public funding to abortion. The woman with the scarf was correct that education and the military are currently socialized. The initial public option was just that, an option. I counted a total of four false statements among all those you showed. Fox News does spread lies... I'm not seeing what you "exposed" here.
So matching signs mean manufactured protests? Yeah, because home color printers are so rare these days...and such hard to find a Kinko's to do color prints or copies at like 50¢ a pop.
I was on Zo's page...and he accused me of being a "paid operative" without knowing anything about me. (if I am to be paid...where's my check?)
Oh...and if this is "socialism" then why has there been no calls for taking away from orivate ownership in favor of advocating public or common ownership and cooperative management?
Government control is the definition of socialism. Although the HC bill does not have a public option, it has controls in place that will make a public option necessary. The goal of the left is to have single payer government controlled health care. The hc bill is just the first step towards the goal
Sorry collective government control, but yeah, get rid of the post office, Medicare and VA Hospitals. The PO lost 4 Billion last year, Medicare is what is wrong with medicine, and Vets that get hurt on the job should be covered by workmans comp, just like every other employee that gets hurt on the job, they should be able to choose the hospital.
IS IT TIME?! Go to USRevolution2 (dot com) and get your flag of the Second American Revolution. They were recently all over the tax day rallies in Boston and D.C. They will also soon appear in Bob Basso’s new Thomas Paine videos and on Showtime’s “Weeds” show. They look exactly like the flag of Betsy Ross with a Roman numeral “II” in the center of the 13 stars. This flag is now in all 50 states and spreading from porch to porch. They make great gifts for family, friends and recovering Liberals.
@mjswans I heard her interviewed. She's very conservative. She wrote an anti-Obama song called "There's a communist living in the white house". I recognized her voice on the video from that song. I think it's a bit harsh and unhelpful. Republicans RIGHTLY criticized the left for demonizing Bush as Hitler, etc. Why resort to the same methods we knew are wrong when the left used them?
@TomerMMHA Im not giving you a hard time. But i just wanna make sure that ppl know there is difference between todays republicans and todays tea party. I dont agree with obama health care plan. And your correct rep did make big deal that bush was like hitler. But the left use its favorite card of all. Racist card. I just ppl see the over all picture rep and dem dont care about us small ppl. Majority of them need be kicked out of office.
@hipstermi The left use call bush nazi all the time. ive seen the signs of him dress like hitler. (and prob same for obama) And socialist thats not a racial slur at all. So i don"t get your point. Calling someone a racist just because you dont agree with there political views is a big deal. Also obama is not socialist he is a corporatist.
Not ALL the left, and many of us objected to it as well. Ever hear of Godwin's law? That's what I remember liberals online replying. Conservatives today? they just yuck it up.
"Calling someone a racist just because you dont agree"
I wouldnt do that. SOmeone like Rush and his "magic negro" playlist I might.
I might use BIGOT on those that oppose gay marriage. and no, religion is not an excuse.
@hipstermi "not all the left, and many of us object to it as well" Same can be said about the right. ( not saying you was emplay that). And Rush im not to big on him either ppl say anything for shock value. Also gay marriage subject. I think if someone disagree with it than thats there point of view. Same with the ones that agree with it. Religion, i dont think that makes someone a bigot if you believe in something strongly to make it ur religion then u should stick up for it.
"disagree with it than thats there point of view"
Agreed.
"Religion, i dont think that makes someone a bigot"
BELIEVING "sin" is your right. Enacting laws is another matter.
If Catholics were majority & made a law "no meat on Fridays" (not as big a deal as marriage, just example) in my opinion, if you or I want a steak this friday, no law based on a religion should outlaw that.
Odd how they dont push for divorcees to not get remarried...make Rush go back to wife 1 or 2!
Where did I say that was? Far as I remember I didnt mention anything racial.
Since you asked, the ONLY exception I would make would be that "socialist" witch doctor image of Obama. (google "obama witch doctor") Black guy with a bone in his nose seems fairly racial.
See hammer and sickle? Guess some brain trust though "communist witch doctor" made so much sense.
"If they knew what socialism is they'll like it" <- 4:58
Wtf...
I'm not moving to America anymore... America was my dream. What the fuck you people did ? I can't believe ...
I'll stay more 8 years in Brazil socialist hell(50.000 violent deaths per year) and I'll move to a free country. USA is not free anymore...
USA= moving towards socialism because of white rich liberal idiots that never worked in their lifes... I hate elitism...
Sorry about my english
paunocu666 5 days ago
Keep fighting the good fight Sonja! Luv ya!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
I remember a leftist trying to say that everyone liked something in the bill, therefore everyone liked the bill.
The left plays games, they don't reason.
MrMonkeypants12 2 months ago
there was a sonja schmidt who was an east german singer in the late sixties; who did a commercial for the trabant automaobile, if you want to see where America is headed , look up trabant, and see the apex of communist technology. - Solidarnosc!
halloranedward 2 months ago in playlist other
Im in love
GIBal54 2 months ago
I'm sorry, I was distracted by how beautiful the hostess is. What were we talking about?
Argonath357 4 months ago
LOL The video is funny. So are the responses. I like the part when the girl says, "It's not socialist. If this was a socialist thing, it would be a nationalized healthcare." And when the other girl responded to the idea that socialist countries pay 60-70% taxes, "Yeah, but even they get health care!"
BTW, for all the confusion, Republican and Democratic parties have always been switching sides since the country was founded. Check out the writings of the founding fathers.
Milophoenix 5 months ago
@Milophoenix Highest taxes in the world: Sweden 52% it has slow healthcare and it costs some money but not alot.
SilverWolfShoot 2 months ago
This is such doctored, edited, propagandist nonsense. Goes well with Sonja's pointless strawman arguments. PJTV is generic for Fox News.
funkbrother216 5 months ago
@funkbrother216 How is it doctored? Its just short segments of previously seen interviews ??? Next youll say they didnt say those things and that sonja is a pro puppet master .DER Your just like the other leftabots you attacks things but cant show people why its wrong ? Look in the mirror ....YOU ARE WRONG !
stevenpaddybwoy 5 months ago 4
@stevenpaddybwoy Sonja had only selected the segments that best fit the narrative of how much more informed and honest the opponents of health care reform are than the advocates. She did not select the advocates who made the best arguments. She certainly isn't obligated to present both sides fairly, but lets not pretend as though she is. You remember those Tea Party clips that single out the racists and pass them off as the norm?
funkbrother216 5 months ago
@stevenpaddybwoy Also, I can disprove any charge you make against heal care reform, especially that Death Penal fallacy.
funkbrother216 5 months ago
Read Coulter's book "Demonic" and you will understand the "mob" mentality of these liberals.
jcomd 6 months ago
@jcomd I love that book :)
hooplablahblahblah 6 months ago
"Republicans can't read" ???? Wow!
lookingforawinner 7 months ago
It's sad that the revolutionaries have become the establishment. They thing that they are fighting for justice peace and equality. In reality they are just fighting to maintain the status quo. They are led like sheep by professional protesting organizations. Their sole purpose is to further their own agenda. I wonder who paid to have those shirts made and those signs printed? Wait a minute....It all makes sense to me................................................................................
ooxcfhxoo 7 months ago
she is hot
jira40 7 months ago
@jira40 yes
ooxcfhxoo 7 months ago
Hmmm... yeah the current school system is great. NOT!!!
Elestareus 8 months ago
In 1971, GOP President Nixon naming drug abuse as Public Enemy #1. In a free society, people own themselves and the shit that they make and trade, and are free to do that as long as they don't hurt others or cheat other people. Possession laws are of the same premise whether it be dope or guns. Both sides need a careful look.
ultraDoogishone 8 months ago
"Then I realized this is California-who has a job?"
Lol I live in SJ, so true...
gonjinetik 8 months ago
These socialists want their government to tell them what to think, how to think, when to think, when to speak, eat, sleep, and shit. But never learn, just like always.
IChIDH 8 months ago
1. isnt left media getting tired of calling anyone who disagrees with them a godwin referral?
2. You see, health care would work: was the US not in a financial chaos because they refuse to cut their military budget by at least half.
(come on, 450 billion is still 4.5 times the second military of the world (China))
lordlicious 9 months ago
libril left wing r stouped
TheRobert2254 9 months ago
Being a racist means that you believe that the race that you belong to or are affiliated with is superior to another or others. I have yet to meet one black american who has that view. The word you Dumbfukistanians are looking for is bigot, not racist. Stupid fucks.
ultraDoogishone 9 months ago
It was racist conservatives that founded the KKK. You people are so fucking retarded it is not even funny. The conservatives of the civil war era were for "state's rights" which meant that they were for the ownership of slaves as a right given to a white citizen by their state government. It doesn't matter if there is a (D) or an (R) in front of their name, conservatives have been the anti thesis to black progression and true equality.
ultraDoogishone 9 months ago
@ultraDoogishone Sure, us conservatives are racist. Explain this, I am a southern white conservative christian male. My daughter is dating an african american boy, and I am pushing for a GOP Presidential ticket that has Herman Cain and Col Allen West (both men of color). I was once arrested for beating up two white dudes for pick on a black dude. Does that sound like a racist to you. Why did progressives remove black revolutionary war heros from our history books if they are truely progressive?
SuperSoccer456 8 months ago
@ultraDoogishone You have been bamboozled into believing the left stands for tolerance, when in reality they only believe in tolerance of their own belief system. That is why any free thinking black person is labeled an Uncle Tom Oreo for having the audacity to think for themselves. You sir are blinded by your 'religious faith", i.e. political views!
SuperSoccer456 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperSoccer456 How? The progression of blacks out of a position of being jailed at a higher rate than educated is not a leftist bamboozlement. I meant what I said ( It doesn't matter if there is a (D) or an (R) in front of their name....) Anyone who opposes change when change is necessary to end that situation is diametrically opposed to what I stand for Liberal or Conservative.
ultraDoogishone 8 months ago
Its never fair to ask democrats protesting in public what the issues are or how things will work, uniformly they don't know wtf they are babbling about.....but they know liberal talking points!
Shargrailar 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
np001 10 months ago
I'm a socialist and I wear Brooks Brothers. They make really great corduroys. I also like their shirts. They make very nice oxfords.
SynthesizerDemos 11 months ago
@SynthesizerDemos fuck socialism. it's the worst govt next to comm
imaddictedtowow112 10 months ago
I'm sure everybody liked the Nazi's lady. Socialists and everybody liked it. o0
SteelandSouls15 11 months ago
I'm a part-time cashier in Mississippi working for a small chain of stores and now have health care insurance after one year on the job. I earned it... so can you. This wasn't "given" to me.
Gordy19671 11 months ago
"This is California, who has a job?"
HAHAHAHA! So true.
JohnnyC133 11 months ago
So organization must be...bad? Oh I didn't realize disorganization had an inherent advantage over organization.
felixx2012 1 year ago
"Other countries have health care" ?!!!! 8:20 What ?! We have the NHS in UK. like many other Brits who pay Tax and N.I I had to go overseas for treatment and pay again WHY WHY would my wife have to travel to Japan to pay for PROPER treatment when we have "free" health "care" in Britain?? Why does Japan the US develop the mosy advanced medical treatments. You may have problems with your system . But for your and your loved ones sakes DONT think we are a model
wasabimanic 1 year ago 2
Want health insurance? GO GET A DAMN JOB. Pay your own way though life, I do, so why should I have to take care of myself AND you?
WingZero75 1 year ago 29
@WingZero75 you're not retard. if you pay taxes, you are paying for your own medical care. that's what taxes are for. but I guess if it was up to you you would want to cut the EPA, fire department, department of defense, the police, department of health etc.
partisan idiot.
bobbybenjamin 9 months ago
@bobbybenjamin
“Political tags–such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth–are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”
masterriftsgm 8 months ago
Wah wah wah! Gimme, gimme, gimme! What a bunch of petulant whiners. I'm tired of trying to be civil; if you're a hardcore liberal, you're a goddamn idiot. Go move to Venezuela, I'm sure you'll love it there.
wickedchild85 1 year ago
Dayum Sonja, You look delicious baby! Love to bury my face in that chest!
Um.
If I wasnt married and shit. Love my wife! Hottest black chick ever!
goatbut29 1 year ago
First of all its ok to left or right leaning. Thats one reason why America is well... America. What i don't understand is why there are black, gay or Hispanic "republicans". not that you cant think the same way on certain policies but the guys in charge of the GOP DO NOT like you. Never have and may never will. BTW every poll done on fox viewers have proven that they know nothing of the facts... even the facts that favor their point view.
harbingerofpwn 1 year ago
@harbingerofpwn you are wrong, as this video has demonstrated
ace098765431 1 year ago
@harbingerofpwn Please post a link to the rpeort you are speaking about. Also race has nothing to do with being a republican, sanity does.
necrotyk1985 1 year ago 3
@harbingerofpwn
Kind of funny, especially since it was the Republican party that abolished slavery, desegregated schools, gave blacks and women the right to vote, and passed the civil rights act.
It was the democratic party that.... founded the KKK.
antipryzm 1 year ago 48
@antipryzm
Which means it was the Republican party that killed 600,000 Americans, destroyed States' Rights, got us gay marriage, women in combat zones, and everything else that came about thanks to the precedent set by the "civil rights movement".
(Having seen what blacks and women have chosen to do with their votes, I have to wonder if it was such a good idea...)
Cuts both ways.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm
I fail to see it "cutting", as I agree with all of the above, with the exception of 600k americans dead.. and that you can lay at the feet of the slave states for seceding the way they did. There is nothing saying you can or cannot leave the Union in the Constitution, which means that decision belonged to Congress before they jumped one way or the other. They forced the issue by declaring independence and gave Lincoln the ability to set precedent... and now no one can go.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Not Congress's choice, it's the individual States' choice whether to leave the Union or not. A foreign military force was occupying a Confederate fort. They should have surrendered the fort.
600k dead I lay at the feet of Lincoln and the "progressive" party of the era.
And, yes we can go. That bit in the pledge doesn't change what the DoI said.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm
You're wrong. First off, the Declaration of Independence isn't a legally binding documented ratified by the US government, it was a document that was signed by the continental congress before the USA existed.
Second, even if it was ratified by the US gvt, there is nothing in it saying a State has the right to secede from the Union. As i said before, there is nothing in the Constitution saying a state CAN or CANNOT secede.. because of that, its up to CONGRESS, not the states.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Forgetting for the moment that the US government assumed responsibilities for the revolutionary government, it doesn't change the PRINCIPLE expressed in the DoI.
Either the Confederate States had the right to secede from the Union, or the colonies did NOT have the right to secede from Great Britain.
So, when the Tommys march on Washington next week, you instruct your representative to surrender to them, because we were wrong to secede from Britain.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm No, the US Gvt did not assume responsibility, the continental congress (CC) was a transitionary gvt until the first true US Gvt was duly elected by individual states. They didn't just say "We won the war, we're the US guv now".
2nd, the CC tried very hard to reconcile with Great Britain before finally declaring independence, no such thing happened with the southern states. there is also no parallel between the southern states seceding and the CC declaring independence from britain.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm Not only is there no parallel, but its totally opposite. Thanks to the 3/5th compromise, southern states had MORE than their fair share of government representation, but they still didn't get their way and decided to leave. Show me one point made in the DOI for independence that mirrors the southern states "problems". There are none. So NO, the DOI does not enter into this argument at all.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
The 3/5th compromise was 80 years before secession.
You asked for it...
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism," The constant attempt to deprive them of their property and livelihood.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm I saw no attempts to deprive southern states of property or livelihood, our opinions and interpretations of events will just have to differ there.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
the northern abolitionists, with the tacit approval and assistance of the federal government, were constantly helping with and agitating for the escape of slaves. With the loss of slaves, the economy is damaged, and people have lost their property.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm Does it matter when the compromise was? It was still in existence and use in the 1860s. "three-fifths of the population of slaves would be counted for enumeration purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives"
meaning that slave states had far more than their share of representatives in congress. Time and again you can see northern states backing down so the southerners wouldn't throw a fit.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
""He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands. ""
"He has obstructed the administration of justice" by supporting the escape of slaves from slave States.
"He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature."
Fort Sumter.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hiraghm ""He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; " in no way applies to the south.
""He has obstructed the administration of justice" by supporting the escape of slaves from slave States." federal troops routinely returned escaped slaves to their owners during the war, and slavery itself was still legal in the northern states.. the Emancipation Proclamation only freed CSA slaves.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm "He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature."
Again, Ft Sumter was federal property. By firing upon it, the CSA declared war on the USA. The USA won and reclaimed the lost States as spoils of war.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
it was not fired upon until the federal troops refused to return it to its former and proper owners.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
"He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power. "
"For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: "
Fort Sumter
"He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: "
"For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world: " Granted, this was merely attempted by the feds.
And on, and on.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm Large bodies of troops were quartered on federal land, owned wholly by the US government, and given to the US government freely by the government of South Carolina.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Check the history of ft sumter.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
The key phrase in the DoI is this:
"That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Either that applied to the Confederate States, or it did NOT apply to the colonies.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm You conveniently forgot the preceding portion.... that ALL men are created equal and are afforded the Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The abolitionist-republican government was hardly destructive of those ends. Therein it did not apply to the southern states wishing to maintain slavery.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
So, two wrongs make a right.
The abolitionist-republican government wanted to end slavery... yesterday if not sooner. That would have destroyed the economy of the Confederate States, which certainly would have infringed upon their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The men who wrote those words also held slaves. So, that argument is irrelevent.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Surely I recall the early U.S. gov't assumed the debts for the war, but that's irrelevant.
Yes, just ignore the 20 years prior to the Secession War, which involved as much reconciliation as did the period preceding the War of Independence. The New Englanders were vehement about separation from England.
You're right; the southern States had MORE right to secede, being sovereign republics in their own right, not colonies or provinces.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm New Englanders may have been vehement, but they continued to allow Cont. Congress to try to reconcile until King James declared them all traitors, King James forced their DOI and forced the war. The US didn't force secession or the war. Don't forget that New England was vehement about secession from the US over the decision to declare war on England a 2nd time.
Again, the States had rights to secede, whether they did so properly is opinion, but they then declared war and lost.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
I was referring to the New Englanders IN the CC. Such as John Adams.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm
I know very well what you were referring to, and again those same new englanders were vehemently against war with britain a second time, even threatening secession.
antipryzm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@antipryzm "STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
np001 10 months ago
@antipryzm
And you have an interestingly totalitarian view of the Constitution. Perhaps you grew weary and stopped reading before you reached the 9th and 10th Amendments...
(Then, of course, there's the 2nd Amendment, which is specific on the subject of States ability to resist federal tyranny. )
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm First off, the word 'federal" doesn't appear in the 2a, the right is for the people to resist tyranny from -anyone-.
Second, you're under a misapprehension that I'm against a state's right to secede. I'm not, you're just under a misapprehension and I'll correct it for you. Fort Sumter was FEDERAL property, South Carolina started the war by (1) demanding US troops leave US property (2) blockading US property (3) shelling/invading US property... CSA started the war, and lost.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Anyone... including and especially the federal government. There's what it says, and why it was required by some of the Founding Fathers.
Fort Sumter was on S. Carolina land. No sovereign republic can tolerate a foreign army on its soil without its consent, which S. Carolina withdrew.
No, people who think like modern liberals started that war. They had no concern for the well being of their countrymen; their fellows thought and lived differently than they approved...
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm "including and especially the federal government" That's an assumption, it can just as easily refer to the government of individual states.. or have you not noticed State gun legislation in blue states lately?
Ft Sumter was not South Carolina land, again, it was given freely by the government of SC to the feds, thereby making it federal land unless/until the US Gvt chose to return it. It is the same justification used for our continued occupation of Guantanamo Bay.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
No it cannot, because the word used isn't "state", it is "State". When the Constitution capitalizes the word "State", it is referring specifically to a member republic of the Union.
On the contrary; Gitmo is the result of a treaty between the U.S. and Cuba, and we *lease* the base. Cuba disputes the legality of the lease, but inter armes silent leges.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm You make my case for me. Cuba freely gave the US Gitmo, via treaty. We have not broken the terms of that treaty, and until we do there is no justification for returning Gitmo to Cuba, nevermind a government change.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm If you sell me a square mile of land, and then sell all the land surrounding it to someone else, my property does not automatically become his if he says so. I would have to give it freely, or he would have to take it by force and HOLD on to it.
The CSA seceded, then declared war, and was unable to hold onto land they had taken by force. As simple a matter as that.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Great assumption, however...
"On December 26, 1860, six days after South Carolina declared its secession, U.S. Army Major Robert Anderson abandoned the indefensible Fort Moultrie and secretly relocated companies E and H (127 men, 13 of them musicians) of the 1st U.S. Artillery to Fort Sumter without orders from Washington, on his own initiative."
Hiraghm 11 months ago
From Major Anderson's standpoint, he was merely moving his existing garrison troops from one of the locations under his command to another. He had received instructions from the War Department on December 11, written by Major Don Carlos Buell, Assistant Adjutant General of the Army, approved by Secretary of War John B. Floyd.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
If I sell you a square mile of land, and then you tell me you're going to use it to steal my property by force, I'm going to reclaim it.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@Hiraghm
Washington did no such thing. However, there's plenty of proof that the CSA occupied federal land and stole federal property.
You conveniently ignore the fact that the CSA fired upon USA troops on US soil, thus starting a war. You also ignore the fact that the CSA had no international recognition as a sovereign body. And no, you are not a sovereign country without international recognition.
antipryzm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
Screw international recognition; a State is a sovereign republic. Even the Constitution recognizes this. We are a union of *nations* not a union of provinces. Correction... were...
The CSA gave them the chance to surrender their fort before firing upon them. The "mere" movement of troops was in anticipation of possible secession.
Sorry, ultimately, you're wrong. Each State has... correction, *had* the right to leave the union. Anything less is slavery. Yes, I relish the irony.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
@antipryzm
...and therefore any evil, no matter how vile, could be done to them in good conscience. It is the justification for the horrors communists have perpetrated upon the world since the Russian revolution.
Facts and reality be damned, in the crusader's eyes.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@antipryzm "STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER
np001 10 months ago
@antipryzm your funny,,, an the republican has change in all those years,
rush is a racist beck is a racist sarah palin is a racist an they talk hate
speech all day long you act like people cant see it an thats the funny part
toothpickdinner 10 months ago
@toothpickdinner Rush and Beck aren't politicians, they're private citizens who only hold "power" as media morons, I could give two craps if they are racist or not. I'm sorry your opinion of a whole demographic of a political party is based upon the Right's version of Jon Stewart. As for Sarah Palin, find me some quotes of her being a racist. Last I checked, she's a spearhead of the Tea Party so the libs will use every weapon (especially the RACIST nuke) to undermine her. You're the racist.
antipryzm 10 months ago
Beck is a racist? Really? Have you ever watched his tv show or listen to his radio show? Try it sometime, instead of listen the hype the MSM feeds you. Used to be in your camp, thought all repubs were evil racists, until I decided think for myself. If Beck is a racist, why did he have a show dedicated to all the Black Revolutionary War and Civil War heros who have been omitted from the history books back in the 1920's under the Wilson Adminstration.
SuperSoccer456 8 months ago
@SuperSoccer456 Beck is a racist. I listened to his show that you mentioned. Patronizing looks at shit that should be taught in high school, but is only really taught in liberal Universities and Black colleges is not proof that his everyday topics are not at the very least weighted heavily with topics regarding minorities. In a nation with the majority being white, why does he talk of colored folks so much?
ultraDoogishone 8 months ago
@antipryzm
Yet the parties have essentially reversed since then.
Reality wins, you lose.
mecher3k 6 months ago
@mecher3k
Yet the parties haven't reversed at all. Go read your history and realize the Republican platform has remained the same. Its the democrats who went from racist oppressors to minority pandering. Which, in my eyes, is the same exact thing.
antipryzm 6 months ago 7
@antipryzm
"Which, in my eyes, is the same exact thing."
Of course you would, you're mentally retarded.
mecher3k 6 months ago
@mecher3k
Says the idiot claiming the parties have reversed platforms when 5mins in a public library will prove they haven't.
Thank you demfag, come again.
antipryzm 6 months ago
@antipryzm the left are keeping minorities down in a barely passable existance known as welfare.
anime1973 1 week ago
@harbingerofpwn
as a black woman i have to say that its people like you(who know nothing) that are destroying this country. as a tax paying citizen it offends me that people like you get bussed to the polling station to punch a "straight demo" ballot during election season. because i am black am i not allowed to use my brain to decide that the republican party holds more closely to my own values and morals? am i to blindly vote demo because of the color of my skin?
cassandrad 1 year ago
@cassandrad Didn't you know that if you are Black & don't support the Dems, you are suffering from Stockholm syndrome? Jeneane Garafalo said so.
Look, when have Repubs, or conservatives ever call Black members of the Democrat party "Uncle Toms", "Oreos", etc? Never. The focus on race comes far more from the Left.
Aegius 11 months ago
Acurate clear reporting, at least Pajamas is doing something right. Sonja is so beautiful! and intelligent...
megadrummer2 1 year ago
72% of people in a new york times poll want healthcare, so we are the majority
less than a year later, polls CONSISTENTLY show that >60% of people want obamacare repealed...
QCprepper 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@QCprepper Rasmussen found the poll hit its highest point of disapproval of gov-run health care at 60% since Sept. Approval: 34%.
Aegius 1 year ago
@QCprepper
I want free cheeseburgers and sex with beautiful big-busted blondes... doesn't mean that, just because I want these things, my fellow citizens are under any obligation to provide them...
Hiraghm 11 months ago
Sarah palin will destroy the Republican party. She is not more intelligent nor more experienced than obama.
The Tea Party and the Republican party HAS TO BRING SOMEONE MORE INTELLIGENT TO THE FOREFRONT!!
ThunderAppeal 1 year ago
@ThunderAppeal
Palin is another Swartzenegger and will end up being another Nixon (in terms of policy).
However, the problem conservatives have is a surplus of intelligent potential candidates.
Hiraghm 11 months ago
Limited thinkers will always have broke handout mentality.
edlove1220 1 year ago
Excellent Sonja! Good job.
You know, when I here these smarmy, rat bastard, ass clown, left wing loon, liberal, progressive/socialist/Marxist son's a bitches, I just want to puke.
How did we ever get a population so brain dead? Their ignorance is only surpassed by their juvenile arrogance!
These un American traitors just need to be bitch slapped into next week!
I just love the way they read your comment here and then try to "engaged" you in debate?
They just need an ass kick'n
GutpileCharlie 1 year ago
@GutpileCharlie Yah! Down with the commie DPW run by the state! DOwn with the commie education system run by the state! The Police and fire stations are run by the state! Forest and recreation comission are state run! IMMIGRATION OFFICE IS STATE RUN THEY MUST BE COMMIES!
I love the selective hypocritical logic.
DrewDubious 1 year ago
@DrewDubious Damn!...You just prove my point. You are completely brain dead, morally, ethically and intellectually disabled.
You just need to know when to shut your smarmy mouth, you pathetic piece of left wing.socialist/Marxist piece of shit.
Know what the hell you are talking about but for you open your mouth and show your ass. I hold you and those like you in complete contempt.
You are a complete piece of excrement.
GutpileCharlie 1 year ago
@DrewDubious Either you are pulling my leg.....or you are the dumbest son of a bitch to ever come down the pike>
You have'n fun with this. Does this "tickle your fancy" you left wing puke? Do you get off on being just a complete, ignorant ass hole?
I can only say that you wouldn't make a scab on a decent, respectable American's ass. You are a disgrace to the nation and the world.
GutpileCharlie 1 year ago
@GutpileCharlie The thing with liberal scum is that their whole empty little lives are all about being a smart ass and smarmy. They believe that by being a smart as that makes them clever. They are empty soulless little ghouls who derive a sado-masochistic type of satisfaction from being contemptiious of anything that has a level of civility to it.
ThunderAppeal 1 year ago 2
@ThunderAppeal You are so right. It's nice to hear a response from a real American with common sense.
Have a good Thanksgiving, patriot.
GutpileCharlie 1 year ago
@ThunderAppeal are you really calling me out on civility when just below you call me a stupid little asshole?
DrewDubious 1 year ago
@DrewDubious You stupid little asshole. Police and fire are in fact run by the state NOT BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, BUT YOU COMMIE LIBERAL SCUM REFUSE TO BE ABLE TO DISCERN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO. The reason for that is because you worthless little assholes have no control over your own little worthless lives so hence you want to control the lives of people you dont know. You dont know logic if it slapped you across your shit eating little face.
ThunderAppeal 1 year ago
@ThunderAppeal if you look closely I did say state run.
DrewDubious 1 year ago
The gov already runs healthcare for the military. Hawaii has had state run healthcare for 40 years. Does that mean we have communist soldiers and a red state in our midst?
DrewDubious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrewDubious
"The gov already runs healthcare for the military. Hawaii has had state run healthcare for 40 years. Does that mean we have communist soldiers and a red state in our midst?"
No it means we have prime examples of what happens when citizens regulate a healthcare systems so that corporations wont take over and mess us over. But people are blinded by people like Sarah Palin.
TheCaliCapitalist 1 year ago
@DrewDubious The average citizen IS NOT A SOLDIER, THE FACT THAT YOU CANT TELL THE DIFFERENCE IS PROOF HOW STUPID YOU LIBERALS ARE.
And if Hawaii wants to have its own state health care thats the states perogative. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STATE AND FEDERAL YOU IDIOT.
ThunderAppeal 1 year ago
@ThunderAppeal riight. You missed my point, or just chose to ignrore it completely. Not to mention the hypocricy in your statement "If hawaii wants to have it's own state run healthcare thats the states perogative". Now, again, is Hawaii a communist state since it has state run healthcare?
DrewDubious 1 year ago
@DrewDubious The only point is the one one your head dipshit. I'll spell out for you AGAIN because it is clear that you have a reading comprehension problem as most liberals do. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STATE RUN PROGRAMS AND FEDERALLY RUN PROGRAMS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SOLDIER AND A CITIZEN. Because of your stupidity and reading comprehension problem you are unable to tell the difference between the two.
ThunderAppeal 1 year ago
@ThunderAppeal By the by, for a peace loving type who claims to have respect for all humankind you sue do talk funny. I think it's the insults that threw me. Now, try that again with some self control and a little respect if you would please.
DrewDubious 1 year ago
5:10 Has that women ever been to Russia or China or any other 3rd world country? Socialism really sucks for a good portion of those countries. You have pockets of 1st world country status cities, and a crapload of 3rd world country surroundings.
7:20 "They're just mad b/c he's black and he won". Well if that isn't the most racist statement of the year, I dont know what is. Bringing up the fact that he's "black" already qualifies you as a racist; if no one else said it, why are you?
theaznfishy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@theaznfishy "They're just mad b/c he's black and he won". Well if that isn't the most racist statement of the year, I dont know what is. Bringing up the fact that he's "black" already qualifies you as a racist; if no one else said it, why are you?"
That is some messed up logic... It might be ignorant and self serving, but racist? racist against whom? Mebee if only whites voted against obama.... but obviously that is not how it went down...
DrewDubious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These people are fucking retarded.
gastof179 1 year ago
look at the brother wit his mid indformation 72%^ says cbsees
georgesorosisgay 1 year ago
1 yr ago Oregon had Senators in each county on the issue, the socialist bused in immigrants for amnesity literally duck taping paper with messages on the front and back of their shirts. Some were not even 18..they had no clue why they were their but they got some benefits from doing this which is Sal A RULES FOR RADICALS.
bethwall 1 year ago
watermelonygoodyness.cbs is not a reliable news source just look at dan rather. i agree that the military is socialized but absolutely needed. i have served in the us navy and it is a volunteer choice.
7119frankr 1 year ago
The man at 4:11 is not misinformed. CBS did do a poll that showed 72% of Americans view a public option preferably. That woman was correct that the health care bill gives no public funding to abortion. The woman with the scarf was correct that education and the military are currently socialized. The initial public option was just that, an option. I counted a total of four false statements among all those you showed. Fox News does spread lies... I'm not seeing what you "exposed" here.
watermelonygoodness 1 year ago
@watermelonygoodness read the bill dude! your misinformed
georgesorosisgay 1 year ago
@georgesorosisgay I did read the bill. My misinformed what?
watermelonygoodness 1 year ago
love this . its great exposing idiots
7119frankr 1 year ago
this lady is smart and hott . she needs to be on fox!!!
7119frankr 1 year ago
this lady is smart and hott . she needs to be on fox!!
7119frankr 1 year ago
Wow she is hot and smart... dang hard to find that anymore.
mrmagicmixable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So matching signs mean manufactured protests? Yeah, because home color printers are so rare these days...and such hard to find a Kinko's to do color prints or copies at like 50¢ a pop.
I was on Zo's page...and he accused me of being a "paid operative" without knowing anything about me. (if I am to be paid...where's my check?)
hipstermi 1 year ago
Oh...and if this is "socialism" then why has there been no calls for taking away from orivate ownership in favor of advocating public or common ownership and cooperative management?
You know...the actual definition of socialism?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi
Government control is the definition of socialism. Although the HC bill does not have a public option, it has controls in place that will make a public option necessary. The goal of the left is to have single payer government controlled health care. The hc bill is just the first step towards the goal
jjrglobal 1 year ago
@jjrglobal
"Government control is the definition of socialism"
Websters says different "collective or governmental OWNERSHIP... AND administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"
You want to say every government run service is "socialism"? That means no more post office, Medicare, or VA hospitals?
Maybe you should can the conservative talk show "talking points" and labels and stick with issues?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi
Sorry collective government control, but yeah, get rid of the post office, Medicare and VA Hospitals. The PO lost 4 Billion last year, Medicare is what is wrong with medicine, and Vets that get hurt on the job should be covered by workmans comp, just like every other employee that gets hurt on the job, they should be able to choose the hospital.
jjrglobal 1 year ago
Comment removed
hipstermi 1 year ago
Good job, Sonja!
aaa333ify 1 year ago
good work!
Yamaha52g 1 year ago
Organizing Against America.org
Auggie56 1 year ago
AHHHHHH the stupidity!!!:
q:"who will pay?"
a: "I don't understand the finance of it!, i don't!"
O'relly?!
stas1ee7 1 year ago
Comment removed
stas1ee7 1 year ago
IS IT TIME?! Go to USRevolution2 (dot com) and get your flag of the Second American Revolution. They were recently all over the tax day rallies in Boston and D.C. They will also soon appear in Bob Basso’s new Thomas Paine videos and on Showtime’s “Weeds” show. They look exactly like the flag of Betsy Ross with a Roman numeral “II” in the center of the 13 stars. This flag is now in all 50 states and spreading from porch to porch. They make great gifts for family, friends and recovering Liberals.
usrevolution2 1 year ago
your hot ;)
171view 1 year ago
Well done and thank you Sonja. :)
Bliff22 1 year ago
The "Cold Civil War"....
CARDUELIS999 1 year ago
Is that ape-like creature human? I shouldn't insult apes, sorry.
Uniqueindividual91 1 year ago
Liberals simply make it too easy to expose them as idiots.
excelwelding 1 year ago
LOL!
DreidMusicalX2 1 year ago
@6:16 it that Victoria Jackson? SNL actress in the 1980's? Sounds and looks like her. She's on the lib side of the street, makes sense.
mjswans 1 year ago
@mjswans Victoria Jackson is a conservative. She writes for Breitbart's Big Hollywood site.
CARDUELIS999 1 year ago
@CARDUELIS999 You even know who I'm talking about?
She's talking to liberals, and at 6:16 Vicoria Jackson is carrying a plackard.
She is being interviewed by a conservative, but I've never heard her speak as a conservative, so I think you misunderstood.
mjswans 1 year ago
@mjswans Victoria Jackson is there protesting Obamacare.
CARDUELIS999 1 year ago
@CARDUELIS999 Yeah,...my mistake. She is.
mjswans 1 year ago
@mjswans Victoria Jackson is a raging right-winger. Just FYI.
javvieh 1 year ago
@mjswans I just think it's cool seeing anyone who's ever been involved with Hollywood fighting for conservatism. Cheers.
CARDUELIS999 1 year ago
@mjswans I just think it's cool seeing anyone who's ever been involved with Hollywood fighting for conservatism. Cheers.
CARDUELIS999 1 year ago
@mjswans I heard her interviewed. She's very conservative. She wrote an anti-Obama song called "There's a communist living in the white house". I recognized her voice on the video from that song. I think it's a bit harsh and unhelpful. Republicans RIGHTLY criticized the left for demonizing Bush as Hitler, etc. Why resort to the same methods we knew are wrong when the left used them?
TomerMMHA 1 year ago
@TomerMMHA Im not giving you a hard time. But i just wanna make sure that ppl know there is difference between todays republicans and todays tea party. I dont agree with obama health care plan. And your correct rep did make big deal that bush was like hitler. But the left use its favorite card of all. Racist card. I just ppl see the over all picture rep and dem dont care about us small ppl. Majority of them need be kicked out of office.
mrmagicmixable 1 year ago
@mrmagicmixable
"But the left use its favorite card of all. Racist card."
As opposed to what...the "socialist" card the right uses every day?
Or the "Nazi" card they use every other day?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi The left use call bush nazi all the time. ive seen the signs of him dress like hitler. (and prob same for obama) And socialist thats not a racial slur at all. So i don"t get your point. Calling someone a racist just because you dont agree with there political views is a big deal. Also obama is not socialist he is a corporatist.
mrmagicmixable 1 year ago
@mrmagicmixable
"The left use call bush nazi all the time"
Not ALL the left, and many of us objected to it as well. Ever hear of Godwin's law? That's what I remember liberals online replying. Conservatives today? they just yuck it up.
"Calling someone a racist just because you dont agree"
I wouldnt do that. SOmeone like Rush and his "magic negro" playlist I might.
I might use BIGOT on those that oppose gay marriage. and no, religion is not an excuse.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi "not all the left, and many of us object to it as well" Same can be said about the right. ( not saying you was emplay that). And Rush im not to big on him either ppl say anything for shock value. Also gay marriage subject. I think if someone disagree with it than thats there point of view. Same with the ones that agree with it. Religion, i dont think that makes someone a bigot if you believe in something strongly to make it ur religion then u should stick up for it.
mrmagicmixable 1 year ago
@mrmagicmixable
"disagree with it than thats there point of view"
Agreed.
"Religion, i dont think that makes someone a bigot"
BELIEVING "sin" is your right. Enacting laws is another matter.
If Catholics were majority & made a law "no meat on Fridays" (not as big a deal as marriage, just example) in my opinion, if you or I want a steak this friday, no law based on a religion should outlaw that.
Odd how they dont push for divorcees to not get remarried...make Rush go back to wife 1 or 2!
hipstermi 1 year ago
@mrmagicmixable
"And socialist thats not a racial slur at all."
Where did I say that was? Far as I remember I didnt mention anything racial.
Since you asked, the ONLY exception I would make would be that "socialist" witch doctor image of Obama. (google "obama witch doctor") Black guy with a bone in his nose seems fairly racial.
See hammer and sickle? Guess some brain trust though "communist witch doctor" made so much sense.
hipstermi 1 year ago
Comment removed
hipstermi 1 year ago
liberals are like little children.
helpdonate1 1 year ago
@helpdonate1 Yea except little children have alot more sense.
SkaRocksYea 1 year ago