I don't even envy HW Opus watches which are among the most extraordinary watches in the world, so do you think that I will envy that crap which carries the same movement 23 yrs after?
@JamaciaMohn - It's a diving watch, so the idea is that it's easier to read the big numbers on the bezel while under water. So to time yourself, you'd put the arrow on your minute hand's position, and then whenever you looked back at it, you could tell how long you've been down simply by reading where the hand is pointed.
The improvements here got nothing on the number or quality of the improvements done on the 2010 model. I'd still buy one of these though for the silver/black/silver color design and overall streamlined shape - they're just too cool for words.
They are not fakes, both are nice watches. I have the 14060M , the new model has the SCOC certification on the face , I prefer without the date cyclops, gives it a cleaner face, more of a classic submariner look.
I do agree with the other comment though, you've done a comparison, not a review....and a silent comparison at that.
@TheDorapapi321..... do I hear some envy ?!
rarebear14 1 month ago
@rarebear14
I don't even envy HW Opus watches which are among the most extraordinary watches in the world, so do you think that I will envy that crap which carries the same movement 23 yrs after?
you are one hell of a genius
TheDorapapi321 2 weeks ago
the rolex 3135 was made in 1988, back then the submariner date was less than 2000$
now 23 years later, same movement, but over 8000$
you have to be the biggest moron on earth to buy a submariner
rolex is the most overrated watch brand, and most of its owners are douchebags
TheDorapapi321 2 months ago
@TheDorapapi321 i've got an invicta and its not xpensive and good as wel
MrTekpatron 1 month ago
fake!
Justjt777 3 months ago
Submariner is a nice time piece. I got this for xmas and the Omega Seamaster Chonograph automatic. I like them both but hardly wear the rolex.
MrMightyBeans 7 months ago
hey may i know if a watch is water resistant can i wash my watch with soap?
donhealyou 9 months ago
@donhealyou The Rolex Submariner is water resistant to a maximum of 300 meters, or 1000 feet.
ichris2011 8 months ago
where did u buy the fake 1? Like all the websites on the internet are scams.I bought from a site and never got my watch.
WereHungryFilms 1 year ago
crazy/funny "review".
but it made regret not to buy a 14060m without the "ring of rolex", brand new when I had a chance.
keep posting stuff..
Justfilloutthe111111 1 year ago
i just got my sub date today and i'm not sure what exactly the spinning bezel is for? sorry for english :]
JamaciaMohn 1 year ago
@JamaciaMohn - It's a diving watch, so the idea is that it's easier to read the big numbers on the bezel while under water. So to time yourself, you'd put the arrow on your minute hand's position, and then whenever you looked back at it, you could tell how long you've been down simply by reading where the hand is pointed.
johnnytastetest 10 months ago
im starting to like the look of the ND
jjlwis 1 year ago
The invicat i9937 is Identical to the one on the left , I can see why rolex sued them
qurrer624 1 year ago
Wow, Would I kill to get the one on the left. amazing..
GhostUK99 1 year ago
Man, I want one of those.
EmpireOfMinds 1 year ago
rolex the best
fueretto75 1 year ago
haha when you moved the bezel it farted;)
BirdMODz 1 year ago
Say something!
exploreryen 1 year ago 2
@exploreryen : My english is a little poor. But I'll try to speak for my next review (a vintage Breitling Navitimer)
cedipro 1 year ago 5
The improvements here got nothing on the number or quality of the improvements done on the 2010 model. I'd still buy one of these though for the silver/black/silver color design and overall streamlined shape - they're just too cool for words.
webcityguy 1 year ago
They are not fakes, both are nice watches. I have the 14060M , the new model has the SCOC certification on the face , I prefer without the date cyclops, gives it a cleaner face, more of a classic submariner look.
I do agree with the other comment though, you've done a comparison, not a review....and a silent comparison at that.
davidgarside1 2 years ago 2
don't you have a voice review is when you speak about the watch you are reviewing.
mancs92 2 years ago
That's a comparison not a review!
Nallenbot 2 years ago
For Gods sake they have improved the tinny clasp and they are now made of massive metal.
shelbyfahrer 2 years ago