You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are WRONG- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. Come see.
i wont tell anyone i just wanted to let you know i know and your secrets safe with me im cory wayne briscoe you know my number call me i want to help you ive got plenty of talents im appealing to the least intelligent whom you seek to reach good luck with everything annuit cœptis novus ordo seclorum
hey this is not encounters with the unexplained but a program with the Bible codes from the same people. (Ep 2 is in fact half of an episode from season 2 of Encounters with the Unexplained)
Think of the endless possible letter sequences that could occur via random letter selection. The list is infinite in length. Therefore, what you are now reading could be nothing more than simply the outcome of a random selection of letters. Does this mean that you should toss these sentences into the trash can.
(cont'd) So if you happen to find one code in Dr.seusse, or moby dick, Does it compare anything to the thousands found in the bible? (with more and more still being found all the time?). The odds of the bible code being a coincidence is far less than ten million to one!! That's just the math of it! That's just fact! The Statistical Science Journal published and accepted the claim and cCOULD NOT REFUTE IT. IT WENT THROUGH MULTIPLE PERR REVIEWS! People too quickly fall for other people's agendas.
The same people who mock the bible code are the same one's who claim to using "the scintific method" yet they never looked into it themselves. It IS possible that I stumble upon a stack of rocks piled one ontop of another, 20 rocks high, and it IS possible that it happaned naturally with no one ever arranging it that way. The woeld is big, so it could be found SOMEWHERE. But if came to small forrest with hundreds of these stacks around, would you still believe coincidence?
this is an example of someone being closed minded and not even knowing.. Brain washed. They should probably try thinking and not try to sound SOOO smart.
Scientific Journal Statistical Science (an american journal) could not refute the evidecnce of a code in the first 5 books of the original text (hebrew) of the bible (torah). Of course you can find codes in other texts, but no where close to as many as you find in the torah. Furthermore, the codes found have revalence to the portion of the text in it's original state. A critic AT BEST can only argue that the code came from aliens or something. But the code cannot be rationally denied.
This has been flagged as spam show
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are WRONG- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. Come see.
downyourtube 3 months ago
i wont tell anyone i just wanted to let you know i know and your secrets safe with me im cory wayne briscoe you know my number call me i want to help you ive got plenty of talents im appealing to the least intelligent whom you seek to reach good luck with everything annuit cœptis novus ordo seclorum
Academic1Researcher 10 months ago
I wonder what that means when he said, "We haven't been able to improve on the words."
Jesusknowsyou1 11 months ago
"It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." --Proverbs 25:2
BoudiccaBlanc 1 year ago 2
A pretty clever lubavitch-scam.
Just for fun: take a careful look at all the facial expressions! ;o)
Zzozze 1 year ago
hey this is not encounters with the unexplained but a program with the Bible codes from the same people. (Ep 2 is in fact half of an episode from season 2 of Encounters with the Unexplained)
krystalmanor 1 year ago
thats insanity max!!
normajeanmartyr 1 year ago
This was broadcast on TBN? i thought they were all about keeping the hidden knowledge FROM the masses! ROFL
planetery 1 year ago
ik zou zeggen : lees het boek eerst mensen,dan zul je zien dat er echt iets is
hooglander13 1 year ago
I think you're missing the first few minutes.
scottieman2 2 years ago
Think of the endless possible letter sequences that could occur via random letter selection. The list is infinite in length. Therefore, what you are now reading could be nothing more than simply the outcome of a random selection of letters. Does this mean that you should toss these sentences into the trash can.
NEWKNOWLEDGE 2 years ago
(cont'd) So if you happen to find one code in Dr.seusse, or moby dick, Does it compare anything to the thousands found in the bible? (with more and more still being found all the time?). The odds of the bible code being a coincidence is far less than ten million to one!! That's just the math of it! That's just fact! The Statistical Science Journal published and accepted the claim and cCOULD NOT REFUTE IT. IT WENT THROUGH MULTIPLE PERR REVIEWS! People too quickly fall for other people's agendas.
yistackness 2 years ago
The same people who mock the bible code are the same one's who claim to using "the scintific method" yet they never looked into it themselves. It IS possible that I stumble upon a stack of rocks piled one ontop of another, 20 rocks high, and it IS possible that it happaned naturally with no one ever arranging it that way. The woeld is big, so it could be found SOMEWHERE. But if came to small forrest with hundreds of these stacks around, would you still believe coincidence?
yistackness 2 years ago
@yistackness you seem smart ,see my vids and you become correct.
drhoecker 1 year ago
You do realize that using the same rules, Dr Seuss books become eerie prophecy!
acme181169 2 years ago
Can you give us some examples from Dr Seuss?
rplende 2 years ago
this is an example of someone being closed minded and not even knowing.. Brain washed. They should probably try thinking and not try to sound SOOO smart.
BaruachHaShem 2 years ago
Scientific Journal Statistical Science (an american journal) could not refute the evidecnce of a code in the first 5 books of the original text (hebrew) of the bible (torah). Of course you can find codes in other texts, but no where close to as many as you find in the torah. Furthermore, the codes found have revalence to the portion of the text in it's original state. A critic AT BEST can only argue that the code came from aliens or something. But the code cannot be rationally denied.
yistackness 2 years ago