Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
So you would sacrifice our rights of equality and simply back away into the dark? If the adoption agencies are too blind to realise that gay couples are just as loving as parents as straight couples then perhaps they should not have the right to refuse a child a loving family and should be shut down.
There is not any sufficient proof suggesting that someone is born gay, in fact nature declares otherwise since they cannot procreate therefore they should not be put into a special category due to a personal choice to have relations with the same sex, nor should they have any special protection based off sexual preference. My rights are being robbed based off of a group of people who represent less that 2% of the poulation, it is a choice no different then a child predator. Is that next???????
@QUEENBEACHA "There is not any sufficient proof suggesting that someone is born gay"
There is mountains of evidence. Your refusal to investigate the wealth scientific data available does not make it cease to exist.
"nature declares otherwise since they cannot procreate"
If you looked into those scientific studies you're convinced don't exist, you'd have the explanation for our existence. (Hint - it has to do with the mother's genetics and biochemistry)
A few things your ignoring about this law. Its no different than allowing interracial couples and couples who want to adopt children of different races. Many adoption agencies in the 60s and 70s closed because they would to go along with the new laws. Some it was political and others it was religious. The state can make more adoption agencies to replace the ones lost. Birth parents can still choose if the race, religion and sexual orientation of the family that adopts their baby.
that sounds like separate but equal. this is a human rights issue. the rights and benefits you receive from marriage are not offered to those in civil unions and domestic partnerships. denying marriage to same sex couples is minority discrimination!!
@bortous, if gay sex does NOT feel normal to you, maybe you're just not doing it right. Try reading The Joy Of Gay Sex, it will give you and your next boyfriend some pointers.
@bortous, my admitting that I am better educated, more rational, and a more moral person than you are is just acknowledging reality. Why does the truth frighten and infuriate you so much? This is yet another which which, if you were smart, you would hash out with a competent therapist. Unfortunately, while it's easy to diagnose you, I'm afraid that you have far too many "issues" to cure effectively in this forum. All I can do is hope that you one day get the help for which you are crying out.
@MattFrame Mmm. You seem to believe your own illusions and supposed superiority. Congratulations.
I admire the basis of your diagnosis. My advice to you would be to take a look in the mirror and realize what you are. Then we would be able to discuss things rationally and we could even work out which mental institution we could check you in.
@bortous, the truth is easy to believe in...if you are rational, intelligent, & stable enough to understand what it is. Thinking that you could even be ABLE to discuss anything rationally in your current state is additional proof--if amusing--of my original assessment. I realize that your petulant replies are borne out of fear; it must be frightening for you to realize how easily your facade can be seen through, but I hope that your natural cowardice will not prevent you from seeking help.
@MattFrame you should become a comedian. You are funny. Your use of intellectualism does not intimidate a Jew. My wealth is probably already much higher than yours. We rule the world and one day you will be paying me interest if you ever loan any money from a bank to purchase property etc. Can't wait!
I'm a strong believer in judiasm and I detest this topic on homosexuality and so do most people on the earth.
Your opinion is your own so I suggest you get over your self- righteousness.
@bortous, guiding you to reality & psychiatric care should not be seen as "intimidation". Sadly, we must add paranoia to your list of illnesses. Unfortunately, any wealth you may have stumbled your way into is negated by your intellectual, moral, & educational bankruptcy. Perhaps the "people" on the planet you live on "detest" diversity, but here on God's earth, those of us who know & accept His will know that He is the one who creates His gay children, and His decisions are good enough for us.
Oh no! You have to treat gay people equally with dignity and respect? Preposterous!
It's interesting, you see "gay fascism", I see gay people trying to get the same rights heterosexuals have. Furthermore, how can one justify denying adoption to someone based on orientation? It would be the equivalent of saying, "We're not going to allow you to adopt a child because you're black/ you're Jewish/ you're lower-middle class".
When schools in the southern US were desegregated, there were people who said their rights were being taken away - they wanted the right to attend segregated schools.
The point is that when a minority fights for its rights, there will always be an opposition that claims that any changes made to society will take away their freedoms.
Gay people ARE every day americans you idiot. There is no "gay agenda" Unless you consider a group of people fighting for basic civil liberties an "agenda". You say, "if you don't defend your rights, you will lose them". Try being a person who doesn't enjoy the same "rights" as you do. There is no reason why Christian and Catholic adoption agencies should choose being shut down over providing services to same sex couples. If they were really committed to helping these kids, they wouldn't.
Gay marriage and gay adoption are mutually exclusive because such "non-discrimination" laws can exist where gay marriage does not and vice versa. I generally agree
You're a hateful, terrible person. How dare you post this hateful bigoted bullshit and expect people to just accept it. Every child deserves to be loved, whether by two males, two females, or a male and a female, or even one male or one female. Stop being so hateful and concentrate on your own family and life instead of others'.
@evilsoxkitty If children were commodities - something that people have an equal right to purchase - your argument would make sense.
But the standard for who does and does not get preference in adoption is not about equal rights for the parents who wish access to children.
It's supposed to be ruled by a standard called "the child's best interest". There are compelling reason why a child would want, value, and enjoy having both mom AND dad, so what's best for the child = a hetero couple.
@vicorii Why not ask the child what they want instead of pushing them aside and putting words in their mouth? And by your logic, single parents should not exist either.
When government/agencies criminally abuse people's lives, often they employ their "weapon of subjectivity" by giving the orders that dictate
the diagnostic conclusions to the professionally, subjectively opinionated. That & Evolutionary theory are powerful weapons for the corrupt, due to general society foolishly attributing scientifically empirical status to them
I'm certain of that you perceive it that way. Usually atheists aren't intelligent enough to recognize simply that their supposed arguments can't possibly have even the potential to win, considering that they're mere assertions, ad hominem & straw men. Despite your obvious delusion, I wouldn't be cruel so as to recommend "professional help" to you.
{"before my life was criminally abused simply for speaking these undeniable truths"}
{seek some professional help for your fucking martyr complex}
You brilliantly posted that reply immediately after having posted this one >>>"Just fucking die" please. I'm getting sick of your lies<<<
Its apparent that my speaking the truth, has the same effect on you. Its a good thing you haven't any power or influence. Also, you speak as if you've actually been refuting me within our exchanges?
the criteria for determining a sex organ. If they're beautiful, a woman's feet can be pleasurable to touch, are they sex organs also? Its no wonder they're placed in a position where the Gynecologist can get a good look at them also. I guess Podiatrists must repair iPods?
{Don't question God's design, you blasphemer!}
Why do you usually question God's (intelligent) design, you highly illogical person?
{I'll try speaking your language instead of logic - God created us with a grouping of nerves in our anus that feels absolutely wonderful}
You consider yours logical & mine illogical? Its obvious that you atheists have simply bought into that ridiculously repeatedly reiterated, fallacious assumption & believe its validly is automatic no matter how many times your completely whacked mere assertions have been soundly defeated. Your unreasoning is that the sensation of "pleasure" is
You're incorrectly executed, defective thought process are definitely not due to the application of my logic. Firstly, I stated that Judaism applied those "crime & punishment" laws to only its own people. Secondly, my comments can hardly be considered punishment exacted upon anyone. Although the effectively refuting truth contained therein, has been quite punitive in its annihilation of your mere assertions, straw men & ad hominem
This culture war between atheism & theism is being conducted here in the US. That means Christianity is what is truly being attacked by atheists. Thus, there is a "relevance" to which to adhere, when presenting your arguments. Old Testament "Mosaic" Laws & the doctrine of "grace" are, historically, the primary division between Judaism & Christianity. Laws such as "stoning" have never been a part of Christian practice & certainly not in America. Its simply a stupid argument to make.
the shadow of a doubt" and the rule of reaching a verdict, based only upon the evidence, they convicted him. Worse yet, they threw him right back in by denying him his release after serving his sentence & the public consented once again to unconstitutional expanded government power. The punishment must fit the crime, thus they split his, apparently lifetime, sentence in 2 parts. He was afforded a defectively corrupt "Due Process". I was afforded none.
time they consent to it, or as in my situation, being that it was unofficially conducted, participate in the violation of the victim's rights, the public is actually also shooting themselves in the foot. There don't exist 300 million Constitutions, one for each citizen. There exists only 1 US Constitution for all citizens. Its destruction, is its destruction & perilously effects us all. There is no way to prove that the infected women contracted HIV from that particular man. Yet, despite beyond
having punishment or any destructive effects exacted upon them or their lives, at the hands of the government or its agencies. The government likes to employ a particular tactic, as with the early 1990's case involving the Black man in New York with HIV. They fallaciously paint the picture of a dangerous monster before the public to cause fear & in turn, public consent to the unconstitutional expansion of government powers. The public isn't even aware of this tactic. Nor of the fact that every
Notice the word "protection" within "the protection clause". We know that the US Constitution's purpose is to "protect" "we the people" from the government by disallowing authoritarianism. The 14th amendment is relevant to neither adoption nor marriage. Adoption agencies, such as the Catholic church's, are not the government. I know very well to what the 14th is relevant because my 14th amendment rights were horribly violated with devastating effects. Its to protect citizens from
been a non descrimination law for adoption.He says that "the clildren around the world suffer because less adoption agencys will be able to perform adoptions. When children around the world also suffer because they are not allowed to be adopted by loving households because they happen to be same sex households.
@ Chuichupachichi That is complete bull! There is a difference between two consenting ADULTS and a man/woman and a child. And actually most pedophiles are actually straight! You have no proof you are just slinging fear balls at people hoping that they will think your way but i do have proof! Most male pedophiles are straight! about 98% of them. Do some damn homework before opening you're mouth!
And without forcing many people accross the country to have opportunaties taken away from them." But that statement can also be completely turned around. Shouldnt also the "Heterosexual movement" be saying that to themselves. If there are children that are in need of a loving home, why not allow them to have one? The sad fact is that if no one bared the homosexuals from adopting children then there would have never
President of Human Rights is for the laws forcing NON DISCRIMINATION (laws to prevent descrimination due to someones age, skin color, or SEXUAL ORIENTATION).He also goes on to say that the so called "Gay agenda" needs to look itself in the face and say "there has got to be a way that we can craft laws so that they can expand rights of gay citizens without changing the way our fundamental fabric of our citicy works.
jobs and contribute to the economy of this great nation but because of who i choose to love i seem to be treated like an illegal alien, and looked down upon. That limites my right to concious, association, and freedom of religion. He is saying it is wrong to have it happen to heterosexuals, faith baised groups, etc.. but that it is perfectly fine to happen to homosexuals. It is a double standard! Which is why the
the largest groups that adopt. He mentiones the "Gay agenda" aka to be treated as equal citizens and have the right to adopt and marry. Saying that they "limit you're right to concious, association and freedom of religion". When denying the right to adopt says the same thing to homosexual couples and households. He seems to forget that we as well are "everyday americans" I was born in america, raised in america, work two
Adoption agencies deal with "Children of the state" ... if you are dealing with children of the state then you must respect federal laws. The estabelishment clause in the first amendment says that the government can't make a law respecting an estabelishment of religion. You would have to respect the christian religion to allow these bigotry-laden institutions to deny the rights of homosexuals. You're arguing against the constitution.
{You would have to respect the christian religion to allow these bigotry-laden institutions to deny the rights of homosexuals}
ha ha ha ha, there's only one little problem with your argument... the word "respecting" within the 1st amendment, means "regarding". You actually believe that the 1st amendment is mandating Congress to disrespect religion??? ha ha ha
Here, now that you know the correct definition of "respecting", attempt to interpret the 1st once more >>> "Congress
shall make no law regarding the establishment of homosexuality, nor prohibit the free practice thereof" <<< Now I think you'll have a better understanding of the establishment clause's truly intended purpose. Its because the founders were big on the idea of "we the people" having the liberty & the power to live life & build their society as they see fit, as well as the fact that they were all devotedly faithful, hardcore, homosexuals is why they didn't want Congress to have any say in the matter
of the establishment of homosexuality. The 2nd part, after the "comma", not period, which states, "nor prohibit the free practice thereof", is even more relevant to the adoption issue. The Christian religion clearly denounces the lifestyle of "Breeders". Thus, when the piously saintly homosexually operated adoption agencies elect to not grant adoptions to Breeders, its actually the practice of their homosexuality. Therefore, any law mandating them to grant adoptions to Breeders, violates the 1st
@Chuichupachichi Now i realize your just a Christian troll who has no clue what they're talking about. You apparently think that we are a Christian nation even though the 1st amendment clearly says we are not. It seems like you're trying to martyrize, which is what all Christians do when they know they're wrong. Neither Homosexuality nor Atheism has any beleif system at all; you're the only one telling people what your imaginary friend says we should do. I won't waste my time to comment further.
Obvious? If nature produced homosexual humans, then that would mean that every homosexual pairing/partnership would be due to the workings of nature. However, 100% of homosexual pairings/partnerships are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation with the sex organs. Also, reproduction can't occur. Nowhere in all of nature will you find dysfunction as the norm in 100% of any particular, like subjects. You will find it only as the exception
What this kid doesn't understand is that the law states that you can't discriminate against anyone when you ACCEPT PUBLIC FUNDING. If the adoption agencies agreed to operate without public money, they could do as they pleased. A perfect example of this is LDS (Mormon) Family Services, which provides adoptions only to the people they choose (obviously not gays), and they can do do because they don't take public money. So kid, either do better research, or stop lying.
I care nothing for the political persuasions of the pseudo scientifically, professionally opinionated. This is one matter which, through the science of Anatomy & proper, simple reasoning, one can easily discern the disorderly defectiveness of homosexuality
cold hard facts, here are they... and I'll even make it scientific for you and your "feelings based" discernment. Anatomical Biology identifies only two sex organs of the human race... the penis & vagina. Two of the same organ are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation. Also, reproduction is impossible. Those are known as scientific "cold hard facts". Try not to use the word "stupid" unless you're certain of them. The facts reveal the unnaturalness of homosexuality, thus, its disorder.
For you, the cold hard facts are unfortunate... because another cold, hard fact is that homosexuality is found in over 1,500 animal species. That's hardly unnatural.
Using science to justify your bigotry isn't going to get you anywhere. Talk about an epic fail...
You call yourself "ScienceReasonBelief" but how conveniently you ignore the Anatomical Biology that identifies the vagina & the penis as the only human sex organs. The problem with people like you is that you have been indoctrinated to believe that science & the Bible are opposites & at odds with each other. If you didn't operate from your predetermination, you wouldn't be ignorant enough to believe that. Now, you can either concede to empirical science or you can oppose it
Are YOU willing to concede to empirical science? Then go ahead and google "homosexual behavior in animals" and you'll see that homosexuality is prevalent throughout nature. In fact, some scientists belief it has a connection with population control. And any educated person knows that it's an immutable trait.
The problem with people like you is that you conveniently ignore the info that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions.
dismissing my last posting of the "cold, hard facts" you said that, for me, they are unfortunate (poor facts). You also said that I was using science to justify bigotry & that was another demonstration of your unintelligent thinking. If its scientific, then why is it bigotry? Now I've added even more cold, hard facts to the previous ones but people like you have already been programmed to believe that you're correct & that any opposition is incorrect & "bigotry". The fact is that I speak facts,
I present logic & rational conclusions. Thus, mine is not truly bigotry. However, your hatred will cause you to reply again with opposing statements & the further you continue to deny the undeniable, the more unintelligent your arguments will be & all soundly reasoning people will recognize it. Indeed, an "epic fail" we will see!
I asked you to name 1 species in which males engage in anal sex. You didn't name one. I've seen the documentaries. They show examples like 2 male Lions laying with each other & licking each other. Why do you suppose that when men go to a barber and get groomed by another man its not considered homosexuality? When Lions lick each other thats not homosexuality, that's simply being "Feline"... its how felines groom themselves & each other. You say that the problem with people
I didn't name any because I ignored the mulitple ravings that you posted. If you feel a need to read about which species engage in anal sex, then google it. It's well documented.
like me is that we ignore info, but that is clearly the problem with you because facts pertaining to humans are much more relevant than those pertaining to animals even though animals aren't homosexuals. You conveniently dismissed the facts I posted about Anatomical Biology & the sex organs. Female Scorpions often kill the males after mating, should that be considered legitimate for women to do
and argue that the anus is a sex organ. Don't think for a second that science is your friend... thats simply your delusion. The human organism has systems. One is the reproductive system. The 2 sex organs are part of that system. The anus is part of an entirely different system... the digestive system. 2 same sex organs are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation & reproduction is impossible. Its so elementary obvious that homosexuality is not natural that you have to make a grand effort to
deny these simple, undeniable, scientific facts. You also have to make a grand effort in forcing your view to be true, in order to believe that animals are homosexuals. Can you name 1 species in which a male penetrates the anus of another male? If your side is saying that any behaviors other than anal penetration is homosexuality, then homosexual humans can limit themselves to those things & not engage in anal sex. I doubt if they'll feel that they are living the homosexual lifestyle. After
I present logic & rational conclusions. Thus, mine is not truly bigotry. However, your hatred will cause you to reply again with opposing statements & the further you continue to deny the undeniable, the more unintelligent your arguments will be & all soundly reasoning people will recognize it. Indeed, an "epic fail" we will see!
{you assumed that I learned everything I know from a school or news media, and assuming is stupid. I learned everything I know by examining cold hard facts}
There you go again with that word... "stupid". You need to know that I punish hypocrisy. I don't need to assume anything of you. Simply your words are revealing enough to know from where they come. You wouldn't know "cold hard facts" if they jumped up and bit you on your brilliantly cretinous, blistered baboon butt. You want
Luckily I was already an adult before my life was criminally abused simply for speaking these undeniable truths. Thus, although their various crimes obviously cause destruction, they haven't caused me to be as are they... insane. The public must be made aware of these truths, for the sake of their children. I, not being an employee of a law enforcement agency, am not afraid of fairies. Thus, I will alert the public, although I don't receive a tax funded salary
{The difference is that childrens' lives are at stake here}
That's absolutely correct and the disorder of Homosexuality is known to often degenerate further, into pedophilia. Those whom are not accustomed to having the fortitude enough for truth, will object to that statement. But consider that its known that sexually abused children very often end up being homosexuals. Wrongful abuses don't cause good things... they cause disorders
Pedophilia IS a crime, and no one hates it more than gay people. It's apparent that you don't know much about it, however, given your naive arguments. pedophilia and homosexuality are nothing alike, psychologically. Pedophiles, whether they prefer females (the overwhelming majority) or males, are pedophiles. They are not "gay" or "straight". And there's no evidence that abused boys wind up gay any more than other boys.
{pedophilia and homosexuality are nothing alike, psychologically}
In fact, they're very much alike. They're both a distortion or perversion of the human sexuality. Being that two sex organs of the same gender are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation & can't reproduce, is what clearly reveals that homosexuality is unnatural. To believe its innate, considering that all persons who have been homosexuals throughout all time, have been the product of heterosexual
Stop spreading lies. This goes against all respected, mainstream science on the subject. So you can lie all you want about it, but no one is going to believe you. In the end, people will just laugh at your silly ideas. The facts are on my side.
@Chuichupachichi Sweetie, homosexuality has been witnessed multiple times among animals, even domesticated ones. And there is a VAST difference in homosexuality and pedophilia. One is two men or two women loving each other any way they want. Pedophilia is a sick man or woman touching, and/or raping children. Vast difference, bible freak.
reproduction. Is equivalent to believing that if Blacks/Negros reproduced with only Blacks for many generations, eventually they will produce blond haired, blue eyed, Caucasian offspring. The fact that homosexuality is dysfunctionally unnatural is why its a disorder. Being a disorder is why it often becomes more greatly distorted or further degenerates into Pedophilia. Google under pictures, "gay pride parade". Take a good look at them & lie to yourself if you wish. But the corruption is obvious
@Chuichupachichi It is people like you that are problems though, I happen to like both Men and Women, and I have several friends who also feel this way, and none of us like little kids in any way shape or form. And in fact, most of us also hate Catholics for making us seem like some sort of cancer that you should just kill off. Who is it hurting if Paul marries Jon, if you REALLY dont want gay marriage then marry a woman (assuming youre male). Pedophilia is a perversion of human sexuality (cont)
@Chuichupachichi However you can't tag everything as a "perversion" (im assuming yore catholic by your arguement) Your religion was very much based on Paganism, same holidays etc. (explain to me why you keep halloween around otherwise) many of which had bi-sexual Gods. Do not fear what you don't understand simply because your mother and father raised you to hate people who are different.
That's not stupid because stupid is deciding that the criteria with which determine validity is age. For example, in your stupidity, you think that something is invalid because its 2000 yrs old. Yet, you believe in the 5 - 6 thousand year old, Sumerian religious belief of that "all diverse life on earth, shares a common, simple lifeform ancestor". Now that's what the intelligent call S-T-U-P-I-D
specifically because of Christians. The reason why you don't believe that, is again because you've been brainwashed by they who control education & information & they are those who seek to take everyone's rights & rule with authoritarianism. Colleges are now, the institutions of make you stupid. Thats why I have already put numerous Professors/PhD's under my nuts
Materialists are the useful idiot pawns of the evil Supernaturalists, within their war waged upon Christianity. If you can't see it, then you're a manipulated pawn.
The users control all levels of education & all major information sources. This world is one big illusion. If you knew the truth of history & the present, you'd be shocked at how its a different planet than the one you perceive. The things they control is why you perceive Christianity to be murderous warmongering but you have rights
{Show me one war that was waged or mass murder committed to attempt to force homosexuality on people}
Its not for homosexuality. But rather, homosexuality is one of the things being used with which to wage war. If you can't see the war, which is not being fought with military hardware but produces the same end results, then its because you're completely blind. There exist the Supernaturalists, divided by good & evil. Then there exist, you Materialists, aka "Earths Cretins".
by being forced to honor a fool. The lesbians went in there to make a fool out of him & they succeeded. The correct thing would be to say to them - "you come in here & insult my intelligence by claiming you want a wedding in a Christian church. Besides, the Constitution clearly protects religion & says nothing of homosexuality. Now get out of my court". It should have been that simple. Instead, I personally, would tell him that if he's on her... then, get off of her. She's being raped by a dummy
Some cases are indeed, difficult to discern & thats why society came to consider those who are knowledgeable & wise enough to correctly judge over such matters as "honorable". But this case was "elementary Watson". It was as easy as they come. If one such as I were standing in that court on that day, I would be expected to honor him or be punished. But these cretins don't understand the mind of the founders. The fact is that if the judge proves to be a complete fool, I should not be dishonored
marriage & they wanted to rent out a church & its grounds for their wedding. The church is popular for that & they do rent it out. But they were exercising the "free practice thereof" because the religion prohibits homosexuality. We all know how much homosexuals hate Christianity. Thus, are we to believe that they truly wanted their marriage in a Christian church? This is how easy it would be to make a ruling. The 1st obviously protects the religion & the lesbians were obviously antagonistic
Thus, what you're talking about would be described as Christians using military hardware to wage war against Americans. Besides, you have that cretinous Rosie O'Donnell mentality of that Christians are in control of the military & deciding to make war. Homos, as with her, are so hateful of Christianity that they will make themselves believe the most ridiculous things, simply because they want it to be true of Christianity. How about the 2 lesbians back East in a state where they legalized gay
{You know why he said that? Because Christian bigots are willing to wage destructive wars over it}
I'm going to explain to you why that statement is so very ridiculously cretinous. People like you are so hateful that you're even willing to go as far as saying the most idiotic things, simply to continue to maintain your incorrectly wrongful position. He's saying to promote homosexuality within the societies in which one lives. You're talking about "wars" as with planes, tanks etc
I didn't claim that all homosexuals are pedophiles. I said that their number is extremely disproportionate to their number within the total population, by percentage. In 1993 homosexuals marched on Washington & submitted a written list of demands which included "do away with age of consent laws, to enable having sex with America's youth". We know of ancient Greeks & there are other proofs also
today. What would you expect them to use back then... "electric chairs", lethal injections", "gas chambers" etc.? Also, you atheists mention stoning with the implication that if Christians are not suppressed, you'd be in danger of being stoned to death... maybe if you smoked a few pounds! But Biblical stoning was practiced only by ancient Hebrews & even then, only upon themselves. Why would they apply it to anyone else? The heathen nations (you) were expected to be heathens (thus safe)
You truly like making Straw Men. You made two within two statements. Why would I believe that stoning should be protected under the Constitution, when stoning is in fact, not within the Constitution. Its very popular these days for atheists to bring up "stoning" when speaking to Christians, in their desperation to make Christianity appear like something bad. "Stoning" has never been a part of Christianity. But even within ancient Judaism, its no different than Capital Punishment is
You don't reason very well. You said "stop using religion as an excuse". Yet, you refer to Jesus as an attempted excuse to support the homosexual cause. "Jesus never said that homosexuals were forbidden to give children food". But Jesus said that homosexuality was forbidden
{God has been the #1 excuse for mass murder(Spanish Inquisition}
The vast majority of those whom were killed, were Christians. The Inquisition was always exclusively the Pope's "baby". Amongst other things, the Vatican's hierarchy often practiced homosexuality
religion which is supposed to be protected under the 1st amendment.
{A higher percentage of Catholic priests have molested children than homosexuals}
The priests "are" homosexuals. That's been long known. They have been for many years.
{The same goes for straight married couples versus gay married couples}
From the total amount of Pedophilia cases, the number perpetrated by homosexuals, is a percentage that is highly disproportionate to the percentage from the total population that is
You tell me to get my facts straight, while being offensive, yet, your comment to which I was replying, included this Straw Man >>> "they CHOSE to shut down because they were too stubborn to give MORE children homes" <<< The fact is, they didn't choose to shut down. They chose to continue to operate in the same manner & the same policies, with which they've always operated. The doctrines of the religion have always disallowed homosexuality. Therefor, that is the practice of the
Well, you may become ill all you like... its only a result of your incorrect views anyway. However, often times "discrimination" is not only necessary, but in fact, a good thing. Children should discriminate between playing on a playground & playing on a freeway. Likewise, adoption agencies should discriminate between natural lifestyles, which in themselves, aren't conducive of destructiveness, and unnatural, corrupted lifestyles which have been known to be conducive of Pedophilia!
Good video & intelligently spoken commentary. Its astounding to see, from the comments, how many people have been indoctrinated into complete blindness by the powerful tyrants. When one considers that the institution of marriage would have never even existed if it were not for heterosexuality, one realizes that its as much the right of homosexuals to legally marry as it is the right of heterosexuals to have pro hetero/family floats in gay parades. Gays began their political game many years ago
when they used to express the message that said if society simply stays out of gay bedrooms & "lives & lets live", then they won't even notice that gays are amongst them within society. Since then, its been one concession used for its political power as a stepping stone to push for the next concession/stepping stone. Along the way, gays promise at each request, that if its granted, it won't lead to what many predict it will lead to. Once granted, its incorporated into their already accumulated
power, to increase it even more & used to acquire what they promised they wouldn't pursue. Homosexuals have no Constitutional right to adopt because of 2 reasons. 1st, there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution that indicates they have that right. 2nd, Homo adoption laws result in the violation of the U.S. Constitution. What is definitely stated, immediately within the Constitution is - "nor prohibit the free practice thereof". Biblical religion definitely involves practicing charity which
benefits orphans & also for the general needs of humanity. Altogether that translates into providing adoption services, amongst other things. Thats precisely why, throughout America's history, Christian religions & not atheists/gays, have operated orphanages. Biblical religion also involves the forbidding of Homosexuality. Therefor, imposing laws upon religious adoption agencies that require they conform to gay adoption, or they're prohibited to operate, is a violation of the 1st amendment
i do not think adoption agencies should be shut down do to not allowing gay aboption.
do you think its right for orphanages to deny interracial couples from adopting? years ago people used the bible to try and stop interracial adoption, by forcing interracial adoption, isnt that taking away freedom of religion too?
and dont start with "how dare you compare homosexuality adoption to interracial adoption, it has nothing in common". when really it does.
They don't have to shut down. They just have to follow the laws that are finally beginning to include gay people. Do they adopt to other religions? Other religious views do not adhere to catholic views, but under the non discrimination act they have to adopt to people of other faiths. This is clearly another way for a religious instution to justify hate.
Justice? And he labels the Gay agenda as Fascist? It would serve him well to learn Lincoln's famous quote: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”
@lisztnut why are fags so hateful and intolerant. Gay marriage is a matter if vital public debate so it is everybodys business twit. and IF you fags would have kept your filthy lifestyle to yourselves we would keep our religion to ourselves , we"ll go back in our churches when you go back in the closet
@tonykeywest08, there is NO such thing as a "gay lifestyle." I know a gay man who is married to a woman and has three kids. His wife is CLUELESS that he is gay. Is his lifestyle a gay lifestyle? It's STUPID to say "gay lifestyle." It's like saying "male lifestyle." A sexual orientation cannot have a lifestyle. I'm married to my same sex partner. That is MY lifestyle, not a "gay lifestyle."
@idaman12345 no one is denying all men are created equal , but not all behaviors are equal- should we legalize BIGAMY, INCEST, BEASTIALITY. silly twit
@tonykeywest08, deviant sexual behavior is when a straight man beats or rapes a woman. 25 percent of women in the world are the victims of violent straight men... 25 PERCENT! Staggering...
@tonykeywest08, no, I don't believe you. I have PROOF that most men who molest BOYS are straight. In fact, the number one professions for child molesters are: Priests and sports coaches... Watch this video for PROOF:
Protect the Children (and mean it) posted by Robtish
@idaman12345 Chicago sex survey12 reported that homosexuals — both men and women — less frequently claimed to be happy and more frequently claimed to be unhappy than heterosexuals. More frequent mental disturbance by homosexuals of both sexes has been reported
@tonykeywest08, oh, interesting. If homosexuals are unhappy, how come heterosexual marriages end 50 percent of the time? And, 25 percent of heterosexual women are either raped or beaten? Doesn't sound very happy to me....
@tonykeywest07 - Have you forgotten that Jesus (of the bible, not yours, apparently) taught Rabbinical teachings from the OT.
Isaiah 32:6 - For the fool will speak folly, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice profanity, and to utter error against Yahweh, To make empty the soul of the hungry, and to cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.
Face it, son. When you go name-calling, you lost the battle, as stated earlier.
@tonykeywest08 Pedophiles are not homosexuals - more are heterosexuals, kid. And it is not restricted to only the churches, but of all areas, including proud fathers and mothers of children. Why don't you just crawl back under your rock and pretend that you are safe there.
@Atatakaidan John Jay report found that 81% of the victims were male; and of all the victims, 22.6% were age 10 or younger, 51% were between the ages of 11 and 14, and 27% were between the ages to 15 to 17 years.[18][20
the facts dont lie FAGS MOLEST KIDS so looks like you should crawl back under your rock you fag pedophile supporter
@tonykeywest08 - So how do you explain all of the pedophiles who are heterosexual? And again, if you think your country is being dragged down, where will you move to make that country a better place with one less hate-monger?
Tell you what - save your energy and write to people who actually care about your bigotry.
@Atatakaidan Homosexuals are considerably more apt to involve themselves sexually with the underage. Anyone actually in contact with the phenomenon has to acknowledge this fact, perhaps most strongly explicated by the chairman of FRI in 1985.1 the authors noted that the best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men..; in contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys
@tonykeywest08, 100 percent of men who molest girls are HETEROSEXUAL. Why do you overlook this? in fact, MORE girls than boys are molested...
According to the APA's testimony before congress:
"There is NO evidence that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals. In FACT, research has shown that heterosexual men are more than TWICE as likely to molest BOYS than homosexual men."
@lisztnut apa whoo hoo , a bunch of fags stupid. the same fags who climbed in the window of ryan sorbas speech and shreiked and BANGED POTS AND PANS now theres abunch you can believe NOT we re queer we re here thyre a queer lot thats for sure
@idaman12345 fags are 2 % of the population and rape about 80% of the kids. in the past 100 years 100 % of mass murderers were fags . what are you a fag ? why are you so intent on defending this abberrant lifestyle.
@idaman12345 actual truth wtf you get your information from where THE TV , idiot the tv is fag propaganda, yo are the und=educated moron here , you have no excuse to be so ignorant . you have the internet at your fingertips- heres a clue - dot get your info about fags from the fags stupid , or do you not get that they have an interest in lying to you to promote their filth
@idaman12345 what facts look anywhere about the priests. again 81% were little boys do you need a brick wall to fall on you. Homosexuality is NOT natural , its an abberant, unnatural, unhealthy, abnormal, behavior . you ve been lied to by the fag propaganda
@idaman12345 Add-in the fact that a disproportionate number of homosexuals have sex with animals (most studies, including the two from the Kinsey Institute, have reported proportionately 4 to 6 times as frequently as among heterosexuals
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 week ago
Preach it, queen!
jajohnson7809 2 weeks ago
So you would sacrifice our rights of equality and simply back away into the dark? If the adoption agencies are too blind to realise that gay couples are just as loving as parents as straight couples then perhaps they should not have the right to refuse a child a loving family and should be shut down.
macreaz 4 months ago
There is not any sufficient proof suggesting that someone is born gay, in fact nature declares otherwise since they cannot procreate therefore they should not be put into a special category due to a personal choice to have relations with the same sex, nor should they have any special protection based off sexual preference. My rights are being robbed based off of a group of people who represent less that 2% of the poulation, it is a choice no different then a child predator. Is that next???????
QUEENBEACHA 6 months ago
@QUEENBEACHA "There is not any sufficient proof suggesting that someone is born gay"
There is mountains of evidence. Your refusal to investigate the wealth scientific data available does not make it cease to exist.
"nature declares otherwise since they cannot procreate"
If you looked into those scientific studies you're convinced don't exist, you'd have the explanation for our existence. (Hint - it has to do with the mother's genetics and biochemistry)
TrevorBlack79 4 months ago
@QUEENBEACHA "they should not be put into a special category due to a personal choice to have relations with the same sex"
What evidence can you present that homosexuality is chosen? At what age did you choose heterosexuality? Could you choose to become homosexual now?
"nor should they have any special protection based off sexual preference"
We're not asking for special protection - we're asking for EQUAL protection.
"My rights are being robbed"
Please explain which rights you are losing.
TrevorBlack79 4 months ago
A few things your ignoring about this law. Its no different than allowing interracial couples and couples who want to adopt children of different races. Many adoption agencies in the 60s and 70s closed because they would to go along with the new laws. Some it was political and others it was religious. The state can make more adoption agencies to replace the ones lost. Birth parents can still choose if the race, religion and sexual orientation of the family that adopts their baby.
Boudiga 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bortous squeals, "Homosexuality is freaking disgusting "
You're probably just doing it wrong.
:)
GodCreatesGays2 8 months ago
@GodCreatesGays2 - LOL!!! That's too funny. =)
ksniveegirl 7 months ago
@ksniveegirl, thank you. :)
GodCreatesGays2 7 months ago
that sounds like separate but equal. this is a human rights issue. the rights and benefits you receive from marriage are not offered to those in civil unions and domestic partnerships. denying marriage to same sex couples is minority discrimination!!
nitamike 9 months ago
I FUCKEN HATE HOMOSEXUALS WITH A PASSION. ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO WANT TO PROMOTE IT AS BEING NORMAL. ITS FREAKING DISGUSTING AND SO IMMORALLY PERVERSE
bortous 9 months ago
@bortous, if gay sex does NOT feel normal to you, maybe you're just not doing it right. Try reading The Joy Of Gay Sex, it will give you and your next boyfriend some pointers.
MattFrame 9 months ago
@MattFrame I would rather die than pursue your lifestyle faggot!!
bortous 9 months ago
@bortous, well, your mind has obviously died a fast, painful death, does that count? LOL!
And how telling that you fell into the idiots' trap of assuming I must be gay just because I am a better educated and more moral person than you are.
Have you ever thought about getting a psychiatric assessment? It's highly doubtful that your issues will resolve themselves without professional help.
MattFrame 9 months ago
@MattFrame Do your think you are better educated than me because you can string a few words together or do you seriously believe you are?
The issues you claim I have are of your own imagination to give yourself a feeling of being better than someone.
Lastly, thinking you are better educated than someone through YouTube??
Professional help is only a phone call away friend.
bortous 9 months ago
@bortous, my admitting that I am better educated, more rational, and a more moral person than you are is just acknowledging reality. Why does the truth frighten and infuriate you so much? This is yet another which which, if you were smart, you would hash out with a competent therapist. Unfortunately, while it's easy to diagnose you, I'm afraid that you have far too many "issues" to cure effectively in this forum. All I can do is hope that you one day get the help for which you are crying out.
MattFrame 9 months ago
@MattFrame Mmm. You seem to believe your own illusions and supposed superiority. Congratulations.
I admire the basis of your diagnosis. My advice to you would be to take a look in the mirror and realize what you are. Then we would be able to discuss things rationally and we could even work out which mental institution we could check you in.
bortous 9 months ago
@bortous, the truth is easy to believe in...if you are rational, intelligent, & stable enough to understand what it is. Thinking that you could even be ABLE to discuss anything rationally in your current state is additional proof--if amusing--of my original assessment. I realize that your petulant replies are borne out of fear; it must be frightening for you to realize how easily your facade can be seen through, but I hope that your natural cowardice will not prevent you from seeking help.
MattFrame 9 months ago
@MattFrame you should become a comedian. You are funny. Your use of intellectualism does not intimidate a Jew. My wealth is probably already much higher than yours. We rule the world and one day you will be paying me interest if you ever loan any money from a bank to purchase property etc. Can't wait!
I'm a strong believer in judiasm and I detest this topic on homosexuality and so do most people on the earth.
Your opinion is your own so I suggest you get over your self- righteousness.
bortous 9 months ago
@bortous, guiding you to reality & psychiatric care should not be seen as "intimidation". Sadly, we must add paranoia to your list of illnesses. Unfortunately, any wealth you may have stumbled your way into is negated by your intellectual, moral, & educational bankruptcy. Perhaps the "people" on the planet you live on "detest" diversity, but here on God's earth, those of us who know & accept His will know that He is the one who creates His gay children, and His decisions are good enough for us.
MattFrame 9 months ago
Oh no! You have to treat gay people equally with dignity and respect? Preposterous!
It's interesting, you see "gay fascism", I see gay people trying to get the same rights heterosexuals have. Furthermore, how can one justify denying adoption to someone based on orientation? It would be the equivalent of saying, "We're not going to allow you to adopt a child because you're black/ you're Jewish/ you're lower-middle class".
EvanJBest 10 months ago
Classic gay face. It's obvious what's REALLY going on with the host of this video channel.
GodCreatesGays2 10 months ago
When schools in the southern US were desegregated, there were people who said their rights were being taken away - they wanted the right to attend segregated schools.
The point is that when a minority fights for its rights, there will always be an opposition that claims that any changes made to society will take away their freedoms.
michelamarielon 10 months ago
Gay people ARE every day americans you idiot. There is no "gay agenda" Unless you consider a group of people fighting for basic civil liberties an "agenda". You say, "if you don't defend your rights, you will lose them". Try being a person who doesn't enjoy the same "rights" as you do. There is no reason why Christian and Catholic adoption agencies should choose being shut down over providing services to same sex couples. If they were really committed to helping these kids, they wouldn't.
Gillypants1 11 months ago
Gay marriage and gay adoption are mutually exclusive because such "non-discrimination" laws can exist where gay marriage does not and vice versa. I generally agree
greataff 1 year ago
You're a hateful, terrible person. How dare you post this hateful bigoted bullshit and expect people to just accept it. Every child deserves to be loved, whether by two males, two females, or a male and a female, or even one male or one female. Stop being so hateful and concentrate on your own family and life instead of others'.
SkelanimalKitteh 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty If children were commodities - something that people have an equal right to purchase - your argument would make sense.
But the standard for who does and does not get preference in adoption is not about equal rights for the parents who wish access to children.
It's supposed to be ruled by a standard called "the child's best interest". There are compelling reason why a child would want, value, and enjoy having both mom AND dad, so what's best for the child = a hetero couple.
vicorii 1 year ago
@vicorii Why not ask the child what they want instead of pushing them aside and putting words in their mouth? And by your logic, single parents should not exist either.
SkelanimalKitteh 1 year ago
That sounds like a good law to me. I don't think that faith based groups should be involved in adoptions anyway.
elmore1735 1 year ago
When government/agencies criminally abuse people's lives, often they employ their "weapon of subjectivity" by giving the orders that dictate
the diagnostic conclusions to the professionally, subjectively opinionated. That & Evolutionary theory are powerful weapons for the corrupt, due to general society foolishly attributing scientifically empirical status to them
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
I'm certain of that you perceive it that way. Usually atheists aren't intelligent enough to recognize simply that their supposed arguments can't possibly have even the potential to win, considering that they're mere assertions, ad hominem & straw men. Despite your obvious delusion, I wouldn't be cruel so as to recommend "professional help" to you.
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi No, because it's obvious you need it. BADLY.
SkelanimalKitteh 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{"before my life was criminally abused simply for speaking these undeniable truths"}
{seek some professional help for your fucking martyr complex}
You brilliantly posted that reply immediately after having posted this one >>>"Just fucking die" please. I'm getting sick of your lies<<<
Its apparent that my speaking the truth, has the same effect on you. Its a good thing you haven't any power or influence. Also, you speak as if you've actually been refuting me within our exchanges?
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the criteria for determining a sex organ. If they're beautiful, a woman's feet can be pleasurable to touch, are they sex organs also? Its no wonder they're placed in a position where the Gynecologist can get a good look at them also. I guess Podiatrists must repair iPods?
{Don't question God's design, you blasphemer!}
Why do you usually question God's (intelligent) design, you highly illogical person?
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi Wow, a biblethumper calling a non-biblethumper illogical. Isn't that like a rapist calling a normal human a sicko?
SkelanimalKitteh 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{I'll try speaking your language instead of logic - God created us with a grouping of nerves in our anus that feels absolutely wonderful}
You consider yours logical & mine illogical? Its obvious that you atheists have simply bought into that ridiculously repeatedly reiterated, fallacious assumption & believe its validly is automatic no matter how many times your completely whacked mere assertions have been soundly defeated. Your unreasoning is that the sensation of "pleasure" is
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{By that logic u should be shutting the fuck up}
You're incorrectly executed, defective thought process are definitely not due to the application of my logic. Firstly, I stated that Judaism applied those "crime & punishment" laws to only its own people. Secondly, my comments can hardly be considered punishment exacted upon anyone. Although the effectively refuting truth contained therein, has been quite punitive in its annihilation of your mere assertions, straw men & ad hominem
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
This culture war between atheism & theism is being conducted here in the US. That means Christianity is what is truly being attacked by atheists. Thus, there is a "relevance" to which to adhere, when presenting your arguments. Old Testament "Mosaic" Laws & the doctrine of "grace" are, historically, the primary division between Judaism & Christianity. Laws such as "stoning" have never been a part of Christian practice & certainly not in America. Its simply a stupid argument to make.
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
the shadow of a doubt" and the rule of reaching a verdict, based only upon the evidence, they convicted him. Worse yet, they threw him right back in by denying him his release after serving his sentence & the public consented once again to unconstitutional expanded government power. The punishment must fit the crime, thus they split his, apparently lifetime, sentence in 2 parts. He was afforded a defectively corrupt "Due Process". I was afforded none.
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
time they consent to it, or as in my situation, being that it was unofficially conducted, participate in the violation of the victim's rights, the public is actually also shooting themselves in the foot. There don't exist 300 million Constitutions, one for each citizen. There exists only 1 US Constitution for all citizens. Its destruction, is its destruction & perilously effects us all. There is no way to prove that the infected women contracted HIV from that particular man. Yet, despite beyond
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
having punishment or any destructive effects exacted upon them or their lives, at the hands of the government or its agencies. The government likes to employ a particular tactic, as with the early 1990's case involving the Black man in New York with HIV. They fallaciously paint the picture of a dangerous monster before the public to cause fear & in turn, public consent to the unconstitutional expansion of government powers. The public isn't even aware of this tactic. Nor of the fact that every
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
Notice the word "protection" within "the protection clause". We know that the US Constitution's purpose is to "protect" "we the people" from the government by disallowing authoritarianism. The 14th amendment is relevant to neither adoption nor marriage. Adoption agencies, such as the Catholic church's, are not the government. I know very well to what the 14th is relevant because my 14th amendment rights were horribly violated with devastating effects. Its to protect citizens from
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Comment removed
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
been a non descrimination law for adoption.He says that "the clildren around the world suffer because less adoption agencys will be able to perform adoptions. When children around the world also suffer because they are not allowed to be adopted by loving households because they happen to be same sex households.
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
@Unforgiven1231
You wrote all of that & the simple refutation is that homosexuality often leads to pedophilia
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi really? is that why most pedophiles are straight?
idaman12345 1 year ago
@ Chuichupachichi That is complete bull! There is a difference between two consenting ADULTS and a man/woman and a child. And actually most pedophiles are actually straight! You have no proof you are just slinging fear balls at people hoping that they will think your way but i do have proof! Most male pedophiles are straight! about 98% of them. Do some damn homework before opening you're mouth!
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
And without forcing many people accross the country to have opportunaties taken away from them." But that statement can also be completely turned around. Shouldnt also the "Heterosexual movement" be saying that to themselves. If there are children that are in need of a loving home, why not allow them to have one? The sad fact is that if no one bared the homosexuals from adopting children then there would have never
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
President of Human Rights is for the laws forcing NON DISCRIMINATION (laws to prevent descrimination due to someones age, skin color, or SEXUAL ORIENTATION).He also goes on to say that the so called "Gay agenda" needs to look itself in the face and say "there has got to be a way that we can craft laws so that they can expand rights of gay citizens without changing the way our fundamental fabric of our citicy works.
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
jobs and contribute to the economy of this great nation but because of who i choose to love i seem to be treated like an illegal alien, and looked down upon. That limites my right to concious, association, and freedom of religion. He is saying it is wrong to have it happen to heterosexuals, faith baised groups, etc.. but that it is perfectly fine to happen to homosexuals. It is a double standard! Which is why the
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
the largest groups that adopt. He mentiones the "Gay agenda" aka to be treated as equal citizens and have the right to adopt and marry. Saying that they "limit you're right to concious, association and freedom of religion". When denying the right to adopt says the same thing to homosexual couples and households. He seems to forget that we as well are "everyday americans" I was born in america, raised in america, work two
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
question to him is if no one wanted to adopt her but a same sex
household then would he rather her stay there then be adopted and have
a chance at a loving family. The answer is simple of course he would!
In one mouthful though he is saying that it is wrong to stop loving
families from being able to adopt children. But not mentioning at all
the want of same sex house holds to adopt, which as i have mentioned is
one of
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
If this video is about getting children adopted then allowing
same sex couples to adopt is a great way to help with that. As it is
alot of foster care households contain 4+ children. For any parent that
is alot of time and attention to spread out. Factor in all the children
that slip through the "cracks" and it is just mind boggling. He also goes on to mention his sister who is also adopted. But my
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
Now i found this video interesting. This man talks about how important
adoption is keep this in mind. It is true that i believe that adoption
agencys should not be shut down because they refuse to allow same sex
couples to adopt. Yet! Same sex couples are not able to have children
through conventional means. Thus that means that they are one of the
LARGEST groups that would and do adopt children in the foster care
system.
Unforgiven1231 1 year ago
Adoption agencies deal with "Children of the state" ... if you are dealing with children of the state then you must respect federal laws. The estabelishment clause in the first amendment says that the government can't make a law respecting an estabelishment of religion. You would have to respect the christian religion to allow these bigotry-laden institutions to deny the rights of homosexuals. You're arguing against the constitution.
marsjacobvolta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@marsjacobvolta
{You would have to respect the christian religion to allow these bigotry-laden institutions to deny the rights of homosexuals}
ha ha ha ha, there's only one little problem with your argument... the word "respecting" within the 1st amendment, means "regarding". You actually believe that the 1st amendment is mandating Congress to disrespect religion??? ha ha ha
Here, now that you know the correct definition of "respecting", attempt to interpret the 1st once more >>> "Congress
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
shall make no law regarding the establishment of homosexuality, nor prohibit the free practice thereof" <<< Now I think you'll have a better understanding of the establishment clause's truly intended purpose. Its because the founders were big on the idea of "we the people" having the liberty & the power to live life & build their society as they see fit, as well as the fact that they were all devotedly faithful, hardcore, homosexuals is why they didn't want Congress to have any say in the matter
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
of the establishment of homosexuality. The 2nd part, after the "comma", not period, which states, "nor prohibit the free practice thereof", is even more relevant to the adoption issue. The Christian religion clearly denounces the lifestyle of "Breeders". Thus, when the piously saintly homosexually operated adoption agencies elect to not grant adoptions to Breeders, its actually the practice of their homosexuality. Therefore, any law mandating them to grant adoptions to Breeders, violates the 1st
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi Now i realize your just a Christian troll who has no clue what they're talking about. You apparently think that we are a Christian nation even though the 1st amendment clearly says we are not. It seems like you're trying to martyrize, which is what all Christians do when they know they're wrong. Neither Homosexuality nor Atheism has any beleif system at all; you're the only one telling people what your imaginary friend says we should do. I won't waste my time to comment further.
marsjacobvolta 1 year ago
The fact of the matter is, homosexuality is found in over 1,500 animal species. It's obviously a part of nature.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
@ScienceReasonBelief
{It's obviously a part of nature}
Obvious? If nature produced homosexual humans, then that would mean that every homosexual pairing/partnership would be due to the workings of nature. However, 100% of homosexual pairings/partnerships are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation with the sex organs. Also, reproduction can't occur. Nowhere in all of nature will you find dysfunction as the norm in 100% of any particular, like subjects. You will find it only as the exception
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
What this kid doesn't understand is that the law states that you can't discriminate against anyone when you ACCEPT PUBLIC FUNDING. If the adoption agencies agreed to operate without public money, they could do as they pleased. A perfect example of this is LDS (Mormon) Family Services, which provides adoptions only to the people they choose (obviously not gays), and they can do do because they don't take public money. So kid, either do better research, or stop lying.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
I care nothing for the political persuasions of the pseudo scientifically, professionally opinionated. This is one matter which, through the science of Anatomy & proper, simple reasoning, one can easily discern the disorderly defectiveness of homosexuality
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
cold hard facts, here are they... and I'll even make it scientific for you and your "feelings based" discernment. Anatomical Biology identifies only two sex organs of the human race... the penis & vagina. Two of the same organ are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation. Also, reproduction is impossible. Those are known as scientific "cold hard facts". Try not to use the word "stupid" unless you're certain of them. The facts reveal the unnaturalness of homosexuality, thus, its disorder.
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
For you, the cold hard facts are unfortunate... because another cold, hard fact is that homosexuality is found in over 1,500 animal species. That's hardly unnatural.
Using science to justify your bigotry isn't going to get you anywhere. Talk about an epic fail...
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
@ScienceReasonBelief
You call yourself "ScienceReasonBelief" but how conveniently you ignore the Anatomical Biology that identifies the vagina & the penis as the only human sex organs. The problem with people like you is that you have been indoctrinated to believe that science & the Bible are opposites & at odds with each other. If you didn't operate from your predetermination, you wouldn't be ignorant enough to believe that. Now, you can either concede to empirical science or you can oppose it
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
Are YOU willing to concede to empirical science? Then go ahead and google "homosexual behavior in animals" and you'll see that homosexuality is prevalent throughout nature. In fact, some scientists belief it has a connection with population control. And any educated person knows that it's an immutable trait.
The problem with people like you is that you conveniently ignore the info that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
dismissing my last posting of the "cold, hard facts" you said that, for me, they are unfortunate (poor facts). You also said that I was using science to justify bigotry & that was another demonstration of your unintelligent thinking. If its scientific, then why is it bigotry? Now I've added even more cold, hard facts to the previous ones but people like you have already been programmed to believe that you're correct & that any opposition is incorrect & "bigotry". The fact is that I speak facts,
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
I present logic & rational conclusions. Thus, mine is not truly bigotry. However, your hatred will cause you to reply again with opposing statements & the further you continue to deny the undeniable, the more unintelligent your arguments will be & all soundly reasoning people will recognize it. Indeed, an "epic fail" we will see!
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Comment removed
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@ScienceReasonBelief
I asked you to name 1 species in which males engage in anal sex. You didn't name one. I've seen the documentaries. They show examples like 2 male Lions laying with each other & licking each other. Why do you suppose that when men go to a barber and get groomed by another man its not considered homosexuality? When Lions lick each other thats not homosexuality, that's simply being "Feline"... its how felines groom themselves & each other. You say that the problem with people
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
I didn't name any because I ignored the mulitple ravings that you posted. If you feel a need to read about which species engage in anal sex, then google it. It's well documented.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
like me is that we ignore info, but that is clearly the problem with you because facts pertaining to humans are much more relevant than those pertaining to animals even though animals aren't homosexuals. You conveniently dismissed the facts I posted about Anatomical Biology & the sex organs. Female Scorpions often kill the males after mating, should that be considered legitimate for women to do
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
and argue that the anus is a sex organ. Don't think for a second that science is your friend... thats simply your delusion. The human organism has systems. One is the reproductive system. The 2 sex organs are part of that system. The anus is part of an entirely different system... the digestive system. 2 same sex organs are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation & reproduction is impossible. Its so elementary obvious that homosexuality is not natural that you have to make a grand effort to
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
deny these simple, undeniable, scientific facts. You also have to make a grand effort in forcing your view to be true, in order to believe that animals are homosexuals. Can you name 1 species in which a male penetrates the anus of another male? If your side is saying that any behaviors other than anal penetration is homosexuality, then homosexual humans can limit themselves to those things & not engage in anal sex. I doubt if they'll feel that they are living the homosexual lifestyle. After
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I present logic & rational conclusions. Thus, mine is not truly bigotry. However, your hatred will cause you to reply again with opposing statements & the further you continue to deny the undeniable, the more unintelligent your arguments will be & all soundly reasoning people will recognize it. Indeed, an "epic fail" we will see!
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{you assumed that I learned everything I know from a school or news media, and assuming is stupid. I learned everything I know by examining cold hard facts}
There you go again with that word... "stupid". You need to know that I punish hypocrisy. I don't need to assume anything of you. Simply your words are revealing enough to know from where they come. You wouldn't know "cold hard facts" if they jumped up and bit you on your brilliantly cretinous, blistered baboon butt. You want
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Luckily I was already an adult before my life was criminally abused simply for speaking these undeniable truths. Thus, although their various crimes obviously cause destruction, they haven't caused me to be as are they... insane. The public must be made aware of these truths, for the sake of their children. I, not being an employee of a law enforcement agency, am not afraid of fairies. Thus, I will alert the public, although I don't receive a tax funded salary
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{The difference is that childrens' lives are at stake here}
That's absolutely correct and the disorder of Homosexuality is known to often degenerate further, into pedophilia. Those whom are not accustomed to having the fortitude enough for truth, will object to that statement. But consider that its known that sexually abused children very often end up being homosexuals. Wrongful abuses don't cause good things... they cause disorders
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
Pedophilia IS a crime, and no one hates it more than gay people. It's apparent that you don't know much about it, however, given your naive arguments. pedophilia and homosexuality are nothing alike, psychologically. Pedophiles, whether they prefer females (the overwhelming majority) or males, are pedophiles. They are not "gay" or "straight". And there's no evidence that abused boys wind up gay any more than other boys.
Try again.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
@ScienceReasonBelief
{pedophilia and homosexuality are nothing alike, psychologically}
In fact, they're very much alike. They're both a distortion or perversion of the human sexuality. Being that two sex organs of the same gender are incompatibly dysfunctional for copulation & can't reproduce, is what clearly reveals that homosexuality is unnatural. To believe its innate, considering that all persons who have been homosexuals throughout all time, have been the product of heterosexual
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
Stop spreading lies. This goes against all respected, mainstream science on the subject. So you can lie all you want about it, but no one is going to believe you. In the end, people will just laugh at your silly ideas. The facts are on my side.
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi Sweetie, homosexuality has been witnessed multiple times among animals, even domesticated ones. And there is a VAST difference in homosexuality and pedophilia. One is two men or two women loving each other any way they want. Pedophilia is a sick man or woman touching, and/or raping children. Vast difference, bible freak.
SkelanimalKitteh 1 year ago
reproduction. Is equivalent to believing that if Blacks/Negros reproduced with only Blacks for many generations, eventually they will produce blond haired, blue eyed, Caucasian offspring. The fact that homosexuality is dysfunctionally unnatural is why its a disorder. Being a disorder is why it often becomes more greatly distorted or further degenerates into Pedophilia. Google under pictures, "gay pride parade". Take a good look at them & lie to yourself if you wish. But the corruption is obvious
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi It is people like you that are problems though, I happen to like both Men and Women, and I have several friends who also feel this way, and none of us like little kids in any way shape or form. And in fact, most of us also hate Catholics for making us seem like some sort of cancer that you should just kill off. Who is it hurting if Paul marries Jon, if you REALLY dont want gay marriage then marry a woman (assuming youre male). Pedophilia is a perversion of human sexuality (cont)
penguinlord94 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi However you can't tag everything as a "perversion" (im assuming yore catholic by your arguement) Your religion was very much based on Paganism, same holidays etc. (explain to me why you keep halloween around otherwise) many of which had bi-sexual Gods. Do not fear what you don't understand simply because your mother and father raised you to hate people who are different.
penguinlord94 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
That's not stupid because stupid is deciding that the criteria with which determine validity is age. For example, in your stupidity, you think that something is invalid because its 2000 yrs old. Yet, you believe in the 5 - 6 thousand year old, Sumerian religious belief of that "all diverse life on earth, shares a common, simple lifeform ancestor". Now that's what the intelligent call S-T-U-P-I-D
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
specifically because of Christians. The reason why you don't believe that, is again because you've been brainwashed by they who control education & information & they are those who seek to take everyone's rights & rule with authoritarianism. Colleges are now, the institutions of make you stupid. Thats why I have already put numerous Professors/PhD's under my nuts
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Materialists are the useful idiot pawns of the evil Supernaturalists, within their war waged upon Christianity. If you can't see it, then you're a manipulated pawn.
The users control all levels of education & all major information sources. This world is one big illusion. If you knew the truth of history & the present, you'd be shocked at how its a different planet than the one you perceive. The things they control is why you perceive Christianity to be murderous warmongering but you have rights
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{Show me one war that was waged or mass murder committed to attempt to force homosexuality on people}
Its not for homosexuality. But rather, homosexuality is one of the things being used with which to wage war. If you can't see the war, which is not being fought with military hardware but produces the same end results, then its because you're completely blind. There exist the Supernaturalists, divided by good & evil. Then there exist, you Materialists, aka "Earths Cretins".
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Now, as for you, evilsoxkitty, you're in way too deep & completely out of your league. You too, get out of here. I'm tired of playing with you... kid
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
by being forced to honor a fool. The lesbians went in there to make a fool out of him & they succeeded. The correct thing would be to say to them - "you come in here & insult my intelligence by claiming you want a wedding in a Christian church. Besides, the Constitution clearly protects religion & says nothing of homosexuality. Now get out of my court". It should have been that simple. Instead, I personally, would tell him that if he's on her... then, get off of her. She's being raped by a dummy
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Some cases are indeed, difficult to discern & thats why society came to consider those who are knowledgeable & wise enough to correctly judge over such matters as "honorable". But this case was "elementary Watson". It was as easy as they come. If one such as I were standing in that court on that day, I would be expected to honor him or be punished. But these cretins don't understand the mind of the founders. The fact is that if the judge proves to be a complete fool, I should not be dishonored
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
marriage & they wanted to rent out a church & its grounds for their wedding. The church is popular for that & they do rent it out. But they were exercising the "free practice thereof" because the religion prohibits homosexuality. We all know how much homosexuals hate Christianity. Thus, are we to believe that they truly wanted their marriage in a Christian church? This is how easy it would be to make a ruling. The 1st obviously protects the religion & the lesbians were obviously antagonistic
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Thus, what you're talking about would be described as Christians using military hardware to wage war against Americans. Besides, you have that cretinous Rosie O'Donnell mentality of that Christians are in control of the military & deciding to make war. Homos, as with her, are so hateful of Christianity that they will make themselves believe the most ridiculous things, simply because they want it to be true of Christianity. How about the 2 lesbians back East in a state where they legalized gay
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
{You know why he said that? Because Christian bigots are willing to wage destructive wars over it}
I'm going to explain to you why that statement is so very ridiculously cretinous. People like you are so hateful that you're even willing to go as far as saying the most idiotic things, simply to continue to maintain your incorrectly wrongful position. He's saying to promote homosexuality within the societies in which one lives. You're talking about "wars" as with planes, tanks etc
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
I didn't claim that all homosexuals are pedophiles. I said that their number is extremely disproportionate to their number within the total population, by percentage. In 1993 homosexuals marched on Washington & submitted a written list of demands which included "do away with age of consent laws, to enable having sex with America's youth". We know of ancient Greeks & there are other proofs also
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
today. What would you expect them to use back then... "electric chairs", lethal injections", "gas chambers" etc.? Also, you atheists mention stoning with the implication that if Christians are not suppressed, you'd be in danger of being stoned to death... maybe if you smoked a few pounds! But Biblical stoning was practiced only by ancient Hebrews & even then, only upon themselves. Why would they apply it to anyone else? The heathen nations (you) were expected to be heathens (thus safe)
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
You truly like making Straw Men. You made two within two statements. Why would I believe that stoning should be protected under the Constitution, when stoning is in fact, not within the Constitution. Its very popular these days for atheists to bring up "stoning" when speaking to Christians, in their desperation to make Christianity appear like something bad. "Stoning" has never been a part of Christianity. But even within ancient Judaism, its no different than Capital Punishment is
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
You don't reason very well. You said "stop using religion as an excuse". Yet, you refer to Jesus as an attempted excuse to support the homosexual cause. "Jesus never said that homosexuals were forbidden to give children food". But Jesus said that homosexuality was forbidden
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
{God has been the #1 excuse for mass murder(Spanish Inquisition}
The vast majority of those whom were killed, were Christians. The Inquisition was always exclusively the Pope's "baby". Amongst other things, the Vatican's hierarchy often practiced homosexuality
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
comprised by homosexuals.
{RELIGION is the most destructive force on the planet}
"when destroying the societies of the Christian founded, western civilizations... promote homosexuality"
- Aleister Crowley - most influential Satanist of the modern era
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
religion which is supposed to be protected under the 1st amendment.
{A higher percentage of Catholic priests have molested children than homosexuals}
The priests "are" homosexuals. That's been long known. They have been for many years.
{The same goes for straight married couples versus gay married couples}
From the total amount of Pedophilia cases, the number perpetrated by homosexuals, is a percentage that is highly disproportionate to the percentage from the total population that is
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi those priests were pedophiles, get it right
and straight
to claim otherwise would be a lie
idaman12345 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
You tell me to get my facts straight, while being offensive, yet, your comment to which I was replying, included this Straw Man >>> "they CHOSE to shut down because they were too stubborn to give MORE children homes" <<< The fact is, they didn't choose to shut down. They chose to continue to operate in the same manner & the same policies, with which they've always operated. The doctrines of the religion have always disallowed homosexuality. Therefor, that is the practice of the
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Sorry but when the fundamental of the fabric of society doesn't include equal rights for same sex couples, yes, it must be changed.
krystosdobs 1 year ago
get your ignorance off of the Internet please
phantomofhepiano 1 year ago
@evilsoxkitty
Well, you may become ill all you like... its only a result of your incorrect views anyway. However, often times "discrimination" is not only necessary, but in fact, a good thing. Children should discriminate between playing on a playground & playing on a freeway. Likewise, adoption agencies should discriminate between natural lifestyles, which in themselves, aren't conducive of destructiveness, and unnatural, corrupted lifestyles which have been known to be conducive of Pedophilia!
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Good video & intelligently spoken commentary. Its astounding to see, from the comments, how many people have been indoctrinated into complete blindness by the powerful tyrants. When one considers that the institution of marriage would have never even existed if it were not for heterosexuality, one realizes that its as much the right of homosexuals to legally marry as it is the right of heterosexuals to have pro hetero/family floats in gay parades. Gays began their political game many years ago
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
gays aren't playing political games. They just want their rights and then go home and raise their family. stop wining.
krystosdobs 1 year ago
when they used to express the message that said if society simply stays out of gay bedrooms & "lives & lets live", then they won't even notice that gays are amongst them within society. Since then, its been one concession used for its political power as a stepping stone to push for the next concession/stepping stone. Along the way, gays promise at each request, that if its granted, it won't lead to what many predict it will lead to. Once granted, its incorporated into their already accumulated
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
power, to increase it even more & used to acquire what they promised they wouldn't pursue. Homosexuals have no Constitutional right to adopt because of 2 reasons. 1st, there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution that indicates they have that right. 2nd, Homo adoption laws result in the violation of the U.S. Constitution. What is definitely stated, immediately within the Constitution is - "nor prohibit the free practice thereof". Biblical religion definitely involves practicing charity which
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
benefits orphans & also for the general needs of humanity. Altogether that translates into providing adoption services, amongst other things. Thats precisely why, throughout America's history, Christian religions & not atheists/gays, have operated orphanages. Biblical religion also involves the forbidding of Homosexuality. Therefor, imposing laws upon religious adoption agencies that require they conform to gay adoption, or they're prohibited to operate, is a violation of the 1st amendment
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
discrimination is not a right. if you believe in something that inherently puts down other people, you can go suck it.
dontliethetruth 1 year ago
"christian and catholic adoption agencies" WTF? That's like, "human and Homo sapiens."
Hmmm...the guy in the video appears to be cut of the same cloth as Ted Haggard.
TVWriterGuy 1 year ago
"catholic and christian adoption groups..." enough said.
mariofargetta 1 year ago
i do not think adoption agencies should be shut down do to not allowing gay aboption.
do you think its right for orphanages to deny interracial couples from adopting? years ago people used the bible to try and stop interracial adoption, by forcing interracial adoption, isnt that taking away freedom of religion too?
and dont start with "how dare you compare homosexuality adoption to interracial adoption, it has nothing in common". when really it does.
AceofDimonds0 1 year ago
@AceofDimonds0 give em hell. damn hypocrites. reason will prevail.
dontliethetruth 1 year ago
How are you AGAINST gay rights? You look and act more gay than half of the gay people I've ever met! (and pretty cute too)
GayTempest 1 year ago
@GayTempest
so true! i think he just needs a good top to show him the way...
ScienceReasonBelief 1 year ago
They don't have to shut down. They just have to follow the laws that are finally beginning to include gay people. Do they adopt to other religions? Other religious views do not adhere to catholic views, but under the non discrimination act they have to adopt to people of other faiths. This is clearly another way for a religious instution to justify hate.
massageboy24 1 year ago
Justice? And he labels the Gay agenda as Fascist? It would serve him well to learn Lincoln's famous quote: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”
ditezbitch 1 year ago
My goodness; they won't legalize bigotry?
How awful.
Your religion doesn't allow you to be bigot.
Is discriminating against gays a right?
You're a bigot pal.
poisonapple16 1 year ago
guys ive come to the conclusion it is not possible to use logic and intelligence on tonykeywest08
idaman12345 1 year ago
why aren't you fighting adoption by single people? anti-gay bigotry.
cherrydog9 1 year ago
@lisztnut whats imaginary is that line you think youre drawing
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@lisztnut stupid . God has raised up the muslims against this evil nation they hate your filthy perverted nation
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@lisztnut why are fags so hateful and intolerant. Gay marriage is a matter if vital public debate so it is everybodys business twit. and IF you fags would have kept your filthy lifestyle to yourselves we would keep our religion to ourselves , we"ll go back in our churches when you go back in the closet
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, there is NO such thing as a "gay lifestyle." I know a gay man who is married to a woman and has three kids. His wife is CLUELESS that he is gay. Is his lifestyle a gay lifestyle? It's STUPID to say "gay lifestyle." It's like saying "male lifestyle." A sexual orientation cannot have a lifestyle. I'm married to my same sex partner. That is MY lifestyle, not a "gay lifestyle."
lisztnut 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 " why are fags so hateful and intolerant"
irony alert. you live in key west with all that hate for gays?
cherrydog9 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 give gays equal rights, and then well leave your cults alone
why are religious people so hateful, intolerant, and ignorant?
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 2 gay rights AIDS AND DEATH
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 lfmao that was funny
wrong, but funny
all man is created equal yet you want to deny that to gays
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 no one is denying all men are created equal , but not all behaviors are equal- should we legalize BIGAMY, INCEST, BEASTIALITY. silly twit
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
you would be the twit, comparing homosexuality to bigamy incest and bestiality
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 duh theyre ALL behaviors , deviant sexual behaviors
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, deviant sexual behavior is when a straight man beats or rapes a woman. 25 percent of women in the world are the victims of violent straight men... 25 PERCENT! Staggering...
lisztnut 1 year ago
@lisztnut Over A Third of Foster Parent Molestations Homosexual? stop listening to the fags stupid
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, no, I don't believe you. I have PROOF that most men who molest BOYS are straight. In fact, the number one professions for child molesters are: Priests and sports coaches... Watch this video for PROOF:
Protect the Children (and mean it) posted by Robtish
lisztnut 1 year ago
@lisztnut fags molest boys and then SELF LABEL themselves as straight, thats not proof stupid. youre too funny
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@idaman12345 Chicago sex survey12 reported that homosexuals — both men and women — less frequently claimed to be happy and more frequently claimed to be unhappy than heterosexuals. More frequent mental disturbance by homosexuals of both sexes has been reported
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, oh, interesting. If homosexuals are unhappy, how come heterosexual marriages end 50 percent of the time? And, 25 percent of heterosexual women are either raped or beaten? Doesn't sound very happy to me....
lisztnut 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 way to go, bigot boy - you take ignorance and make it a great art form.
Atatakaidan 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan youre Bible ignorant
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@lisztnut one has to wonder if faith in Christ and the Bible is so absurd why you spen dso much time refuting it. ???
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest07 - Have you forgotten that Jesus (of the bible, not yours, apparently) taught Rabbinical teachings from the OT.
Isaiah 32:6 - For the fool will speak folly, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice profanity, and to utter error against Yahweh, To make empty the soul of the hungry, and to cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.
Face it, son. When you go name-calling, you lost the battle, as stated earlier.
Villany -
Atatakaidan 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan youre a twit
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 and you prove my point quite well.
Thank you. And now, you can stop your attempts at insult.
Atatakaidan 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan what point twit. priests rape boys . theyre pedophiles and fags , thats my point stupid
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 pedophiles yes, gays no
idaman12345 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 Pedophiles are not homosexuals - more are heterosexuals, kid. And it is not restricted to only the churches, but of all areas, including proud fathers and mothers of children. Why don't you just crawl back under your rock and pretend that you are safe there.
Atatakaidan 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan John Jay report found that 81% of the victims were male; and of all the victims, 22.6% were age 10 or younger, 51% were between the ages of 11 and 14, and 27% were between the ages to 15 to 17 years.[18][20
the facts dont lie FAGS MOLEST KIDS so looks like you should crawl back under your rock you fag pedophile supporter
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 - So how do you explain all of the pedophiles who are heterosexual? And again, if you think your country is being dragged down, where will you move to make that country a better place with one less hate-monger?
Tell you what - save your energy and write to people who actually care about your bigotry.
Atatakaidan 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan you forgot homophobe, faggot
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@Atatakaidan Homosexuals are considerably more apt to involve themselves sexually with the underage. Anyone actually in contact with the phenomenon has to acknowledge this fact, perhaps most strongly explicated by the chairman of FRI in 1985.1 the authors noted that the best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men..; in contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, 100 percent of men who molest girls are HETEROSEXUAL. Why do you overlook this? in fact, MORE girls than boys are molested...
According to the APA's testimony before congress:
"There is NO evidence that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals. In FACT, research has shown that heterosexual men are more than TWICE as likely to molest BOYS than homosexual men."
lisztnut 1 year ago
@lisztnut apa whoo hoo , a bunch of fags stupid. the same fags who climbed in the window of ryan sorbas speech and shreiked and BANGED POTS AND PANS now theres abunch you can believe NOT we re queer we re here thyre a queer lot thats for sure
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08, what the FUCK are you talking about hillbilly?
lisztnut 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 the only "facts" there are that most victims are boys
where studies show most molesters are straight
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 fags are 2 % of the population and rape about 80% of the kids. in the past 100 years 100 % of mass murderers were fags . what are you a fag ? why are you so intent on defending this abberrant lifestyle.
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 id love to see where you get those numbers from
its not neccisarily defending gays and lesbians as it is showing uneducated morons like the actual truth about gays and lesbians
idaman12345 1 year ago
@idaman12345 actual truth wtf you get your information from where THE TV , idiot the tv is fag propaganda, yo are the und=educated moron here , you have no excuse to be so ignorant . you have the internet at your fingertips- heres a clue - dot get your info about fags from the fags stupid , or do you not get that they have an interest in lying to you to promote their filth
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@tonykeywest08 if your going to insult someone can i make a suggestion?
dont make so many errors typing
idaman12345 1 year ago
Comment removed
SubconsciousGatherer 1 year ago
@idaman12345 what facts look anywhere about the priests. again 81% were little boys do you need a brick wall to fall on you. Homosexuality is NOT natural , its an abberant, unnatural, unhealthy, abnormal, behavior . you ve been lied to by the fag propaganda
tonykeywest08 1 year ago
@idaman12345 Add-in the fact that a disproportionate number of homosexuals have sex with animals (most studies, including the two from the Kinsey Institute, have reported proportionately 4 to 6 times as frequently as among heterosexuals
fags are beasts
tonykeywest08 1 year ago