at 1:00 you can see on the left tower on the bottom left of the tower you can see something swiming up then on the total left of the expose building you can see something shining then you can see something move out of the corner almost to peek and go back in crazy stuff
I personally believe it was an inside job. But, dude. There was 2 planes, and 1 hit each tower. Trust me, theres no way that the news was in on it, and it was all CGI. Get the fuck out of here!
@tylerf13ful Go look at september clues b by simonshack cuz he makes a great put the news was in it evey fucking news made it CGI mostly cuz of the angles they made the 2nd plane go rather if its a backdrop a loop a nose in nose out rather if its a divebomber rather its its the wrong way the news was in it. even if its sound its still CGI one sound sounds like a filecambinet hiting south tower one sounds like bells hiting south tower and one had no impact sound at all.
@tylerf13ful Well you tell that shit to the damn news morons like msnbc abc and fox news cuz there shooting the plane hit in angles that the other ones did not have like i said look at september clues b by simonshack.
What about the hundred other videos of the plane hitting tower 2 then? Just cos this shitty quality, possibly photoshopped video, made it to light, doesn't make it true. And HOW far away is this shot?!?!
Gov. Dude 1: "Our plan is to destroy the World Trade Center towers. To hide our plan we're going to fake having planes crash into them. Of course then we'll need to make actual flights disappear so people think they crashed into the towers."
Gov. Dude 2: "Wait a sec, so we need to destroy the towers and make these planes and everyone on them disappear forever?"
Gov. Dude 1: "Yes."
Gov. Dude 2: "So... why not just actually crash the planes into the towers?"
You say this has been banned "plenty of times" and yet here it is. All this proves is that you are a moron. What about the countless other videos that DO show the plane? I guess the government must have kidnapped all the people with cameras and edited their film to include a plane. To say nothing of the countless eye witnesses. 9/11 conspiracy theorists are grade A retards.
What is this guy saying? After all the video footage of both planes hitting, is he trying to say we did not see what we can go see over and over again? Is this guy also one of those who says the Holocaust never happened or that we never landed on the moon? Wow, dude, you have way too much time on your hands.
What is this guy saying? After all the video footage of both planes hitting, is he trying to say we did not see what we can go see over and over again? Is this guy also one of those who says the Holocaust never happened or that we never landed on the moon? Wow, dude, you have way too much time on your hands.
how can someone even say that there wasn't a plane? I mean seriously? If you search any videos of the attacks you can clearly see a plane. This is a terrible view because you are miles a way trying to see a plane through a tiny camera.
No plane huh? That's why it specifically shows a plane hitting the 2nd tower on so many videos and on the news. If you still don't believe me search 2nd plane WTC you retarded asshole!
TonyDayna - Your warped beliefs and comments are nothing more than hate speech. You're no better than the maggot radical muslims who attacked us, and I for one am glad you will burn in hell next to them for the evil in your heart.
If there was no plane, how do you explain the fact that thousands of people were on the ground an witnesses such an event. What about all the news cameras filming live? You sure are gutsy to put this up and say there was no plane. How do you explain to the families who lost loved ones that what they went through wasn't real. It's there. You know it. I know it. We all know it. This was just a stupid excuse to put a video up and expect people to think you're some hero.
@1NKxCH1LL Then debunk it. Until then, I think you're full of shit, just like the rest of America that keeps trying to victimize themselves and act like they "saw" it, or "was there", or "were attacked by terrorst" and "must retaliate in the name of liberty"
Honestly, you are the FIRST person I've ever heard of having a relative on flight 175.
@oknowiamdead hahahahahahahahaha, just watched it a few more times, maybe if you had your fucking eyes checked once in a fucking while you can see a black blurry object (the plane) coming at the building just before it impacts, it was a horrible attempt at editing
@1NKxCH1LL YOU EXPECT ME TO BELIEVE THE FIRE IN THE TOWER WAS SO INTENSE THAT IT MELTED STEEL GIRDERS BUT YOUR MOMS DRIVERS LICENSE SURVIVED THE FIRE AND THE COLLAPSE?! YOUR A DOUCHBAG QUIT LYING!
@SL8R71 YOU FOOL, I BELIEVE THAT THERE WAS EXPLOSIVES, BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE WASN'T A PLANE. QUIT LYING?! LYING OF WHAT YOU SLIMY COCK SUCKING MORON!
That's like filming the ground with a cell phone camera from atop your house and saying there aren't any insects down below because you can't see them on the video when someone at ground level can clearly see them in person. Although here you can still just barely see the plane.
Terrible angle and zoomed our too far to see an object. Witnesses saw the plane hit. People saw it LIVE on television. Are they all government shills?
I am a homosapien. You, on the other hand are a homosexual. What makes it even worse is that you posess all of those other six aforementioned traits of a truther and that just gets under your skin and rubs you the wrong way lol.
Now I will Flush you back to where you belong, homosexual truther!!!
@DiverseLA I'm not wrong about anything. And I am a Conservative Republican...not some idiot libertarian. I don't doubt that some idiot truther is a space cadet libertarian Ron Paul fan. Ron Paul may run under the Republican banner for President, but he is a libertarian. Most Republicans consider paul to be a stupid space cadet with an irritating girly voice. Thanks.
You actually CAN see it flying through the grain of this video. You have to remember this is back in a time when people were still using TAPES. This may be digital, and if you recall the quality was terrible until about 2 years ago.
You can actually make out the approaching plane close to the building just before it hits. Of course it's very difficult due to the wide camera view and horribly compressed video. Having made up your mind before viewing the video also makes it hard to see.
i think there was a second plane. it would be pretty hard to get all the people who video taped the attack on the second tower to agree on editing a plane into them. andd news channels who were doing a live feed even saw the plane. and it seems kind of weird to base the reality of a plane on one video taken from across town.
Its a pretty interesting insight into the human brain.. that even somthing that was being watched by 100s of thousands of people AT THE SCENE and millions of people on TV would be some kind of conspiricy. Pretty hillarious.. or is it sad?
@Holysnowva so you're saying that we should believe everything we see and take it at face value without question? That's the most ignorant thing I've read here yet. You work for the government, or are you just mentally bankrupt?
dude, are you really serious, or are you just an asshole. 911 was a conspiracy, i know that, but theres 100's of angles and people screaming and people saw the fucking plane you douche bag
Yes, you can actualy see the second plane, it appears as a dark smear just below the smokebefore it hits. Its there watch it over and over, its very small from this angle.
Going by all other footage I've seen, this camera is at such the perfect angle (almost nearly in front of the opposite side of the point of impact) so that you can't see any 'object' hit the tower.
I don't think that you need to say "there wasn't a second plain" in order to suggest that it was in-fact a conspiracy behind these attacks. We all know that, but there was a second plain in-spite of that. Your video is just from an angle where the building is hiding the plain.
The thing that doesn't make sense (at all) is the "pancaking" of the buildings. I read somewhere that an American society of scientists & demolition experts managed to prove in a court in California that those buildings could not have collapsed the way they did unaided. That those plane impacts and subsequently the fire could not bring those buildings down in that manner.
U can see it passing from left to right, who said it can't be seen? The quality of the image is so bad you can't distinguish a plane, but I can see a "shadow" moving at the time of the explosion.
Claims such as "no plane hit the tower" can only discredit the legitimate 9-11 truth movement which puts forth observations more akin to "two airplane impacts could not have brought three buildings down through the paths of most resistance at free-fall speed and almost entirely into their own footprints".
You hava a funny idea of what proof means. On one hand you have 50+ videos from various unconnected sources, all clearly showing a place hit the second building. On the other we have your proof, one crappy quality youtube clips shot from miles away and in wide angle. You do not have the burden of proof, you have nothing.
Yea clearly there isn't a plane, thats the worst quality tape out of all the shots of that plane going into the building, plus there are over a dozen more angles of the plane going in, and people were in the streets when they saw that plane, this was a fake so this asshole would get views
there was no planes at all or any missiles, the towers fell because of explosives planted in the towers. and as for the reason why this would happen, it was because bush wanted to go to war in afganistan. if you want proof about this watch loose change
of course there was a second plane. DO NOT get suckered into this type of disinformation. There are way to many eye witness accounts. There were 3 planes that all hit buildings on 9/11. If you think one video is the only perspective, you need to go through the eye witness testimony. This no planes junk is BS to distract you from the real truth.
Shitty angle, I've seen dozens of videos which show the plane hit the building, and most of them were filmed by people in their homes. I'm pretty sure that those people didn't have a way to edit those videos. THERE WAS A SECOND PLANE!!!
How do you know for a fact that they were filmed by people in their homes, and not the perpetrators themselves scattered around the city with cameras "documenting" the event (as some of the Israeli Mossad agents who were actually detained on 911, but let go by Zionist Chertoff the next day).
@retiredaxmurderer Really? You don't think one person in NY that day, other than the "perpetrators themselves," got their camera out and recorded what was going down then posted it on YouTube or elsewhere? Even if those videos got edited by others, you don't think just one person kept their hard copy, or testimony as proof and posted it again and again when necessary? It's irrational to think that there are no actual amateur civilian videos of 9/11.
@2Baiforev ah I see, so hollywood is in on it now too. would it not have been simpler to let everyone see missiles hitting the buildings and blame it on some rogue agent? oh for fuck sakes, now I sound as stupid as the nut cases.
Your right, there was no plane that hit tower 2. It has been proven, that a faulty snow-cone maker in the lobby was drawing to much power and shorted out, causing the explosion.
Rexem96 thinks that if it was a conspiracy (killing thousands of people) in order to invade a country killing millions more directly or indirectly, this is fine if it was done to get oil to use to drive cars. Is his name Wolfowitz or Rockefeller I wonder? Any decent person would never feel that way obviously.
I know there was conspiracy involve somewhere in this debacle...however to say that a second plane was never involved at that scene is dishonest and digraceful, especially since I saw it with my own two eyes.
you are so fucking stupid rofl. if the government was going to plan something that insane, on such a huge scale, they would have flown a real plane into the building. why the fuck not?
and you people are such stupid fucks. if the government is behind this, then what was done was done for our best interest you stupid fucks. if you don't like this, then stop driving your fucking cars and using the oil that this event produced. dumb shits.
you people are idiots, no second plane?? you are beyond ridiculous. honestly, whith this video and you are trying to prove what?? come on inspector gadget I think its time for a new career
To be honest, you can see something like a plane (or Whatever) coming in at 0:15 slightly above the 3 build from left of the 2nd World Trade tower. But this video should NEVER be deleted by youtube. Its an important footage in American History.
Wow all those people on the ground having a mass delusion about a second plane before the explosion, not to mention all those government paid people taking video including live television - they employ some super-fast video editors these days I guess. Either that or the few pushing the "no planes" lines are the delusional ones...
Man r u blind i can clearly see it jus before ur gimpy comment apears ,you can see it flying just over that black building on the left at round 16 seconds ,full screen it if you still cant see it
omg the people video'ing it are talking about a plane or rocket hitting it... duh... choosing to ignore all the other vid's which show the plane are we? (which we all know anyway)... and ummm... i watched it live and saw the plane fly in...so ummm watcha gotta saya abouta thata??? actually i cant even belive im commenting on this crap...pfttt...
@Pete19782007 haha... you are mistaken. he says "they're fucking bombing it" and im sure he talks of a missile because its naturally hard to believe a large passenger plane would fly into the building. either way he's throwing out a hypothesis '6 secs' after the event took place. and, actually watching this vid again now, i can actually see the plane flying into it. look real close (although i guess others will argue this is the missile) the pop up distracts it, look closer 2 the building
@kroqster Maybe he says bombing it rather than 'bomb in it' (maybe)but I still can't make out what he's saying clearly - I don't think he says they're f***ing bombing it though, sounds more like we're f***ing bombing it though that wouldn't make sense. Dunno. I also can't tell what she says at about 1.01 after saying Jesus Christ - was that ----? (don't think it was "was that real"?). She said 'that wasn't a plane' anyhow but could've been a guess. Can see either plane,missile or fake plane.
@Pete19782007 well its quite clear he says "they're fucking bombing it"... i dunno what she says after "jesus christ" either... but i dont know why this isrelevant (?) the point of this video is to show nothing hit the second building... (i cant actually believe im still arguing against this... its pathetic) so they used a plane for the first building but not the second (?!) when they whole world would be watching they chose to use a bomb (?!) pathetic
@kroqster Yeah I don't think it's gonna achieve much for us to deate this point to be honest, but I honestly still don't think it's clear that he says 'they're fucking bombing it'. They also react when the building explodes, not about 4 seconds earlier when the black object first appears - just to clarify I did mean to write I can see a plane, missile or fake plane (the smudge you mentioned which could I guess be any of those things). Can people thumbs up your comment if he did say what you say
@Pete19782007 i hate it when i mean to write cant but leave off the 't'. not only does it mean you didnt say what you wanted to say but you actually say the opposite. i think you mean to say you "cant" see a plane missile or fake plane yeah? firstly the narrators talk of having just seen something hit it, a plane or rocket. that should be your first clue, second look for a little black smudge moving towards the building just before the explosion. its definitely there and obvious once you see it
@kroqster We can probably leave this debate (spelling corrected!) so as not to annoy each other or others with small details. I just always thought he'd said there was a bomb in it then when I saw your initial comment I thought I'd noticed a contradiction/anomoly in his words (which wouldn't have to be sinister). When you sad you saw the plane live did you mean on TV? If not, did you recognise it as the commercial plane or too far away/too quick? Thanks
@Pete19782007 I was in London and we were watching it live on TV at work. i saw a small black thing flying around and thought it was a news helicopter... then another girl said "cor look at the one, thats bloody low as well isnt it?" and then, bang! straight in it went. building 2 should obviously have been evacuated in hindsight, but the govt is not responsible for this. before the 2nd plane hit this was just a horrible accident. anything like this happens now and the whole city is evacuated
@kroqster OK, I understand why you think what you saw was genuine, and maybe it was. Which station were you watching, do you remember? Have you seen the same footage on Youtube? One theory is that the fake planes would be aired on TV as if they were live - if you haven't watched September Clues it might be worth a look. Of course, they could be real planes but not the commercial airliners, they could be the commercial airliners but the inside jb perpertrators could've also destroyed WTC etc
@Pete19782007 i havent heard of septemberclues before. i just looked it up... i could watch it i thought. but the very first thing it says is regarding the media's involvement and says "The operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-generated version of reality" omg! that is so pathetic, needless to say im not gonna bother with septemberclues anymore. alot of consp theorists shoot themselves in the foot because they are really just focused on shock value rather than the truth
@kroqster or they at least start out with "its a conspiracy" and work their way backwards to try and find evidence to back that up... they then end up finding what they are looking for because they want to find it... not because it is real (sorry to patronize good conspiracy theorists out there...)
@kroqster OK, kroqster thanks for the discussion. If you watch any part of September Clues at all, I might suggest the 'nose out' clip. It's true Bush did nothing really and claimed later to have seen the 1st plane hit on TV and thought it was a terrible pilot (bad joke considering what happened on day and what then happened to innocent Afghanistani/Iraqi children etc). NORAD re: Cheney I think. Seems unlikely buildings should've collapsed so quick from plane impact though. Also see PNAC.
@kroqster But don't forget in terms of evacuating the building, hijackings were known about and Air Traffic Control/NEADS could presumably see 2nd plane (even if unidentifiable without a transpnder signal) approaching New York. Even starting to evacuate would put people from the top floors low enough within a couple of minutes. There was a Port Authorty announcement not to evacuate.
Are you okay?
iTheLightningTheif 3 months ago
its just the camera resoloution go die in a trash can you truther
jonjones1066 4 months ago
at 1:00 you can see on the left tower on the bottom left of the tower you can see something swiming up then on the total left of the expose building you can see something shining then you can see something move out of the corner almost to peek and go back in crazy stuff
LvpBeemer 4 months ago
DUmb ass they have over vids of the plane fucking dumb ass
Cpuxtreme 5 months ago
ya these people were WAY too far away to say what hit the wtc's
KevinCali24 5 months ago
"i dont care what anybody says"
thats your first problem right there
notchjohnson1 5 months ago
Too far away, obvio.
Lummers30000 5 months ago
I personally believe it was an inside job. But, dude. There was 2 planes, and 1 hit each tower. Trust me, theres no way that the news was in on it, and it was all CGI. Get the fuck out of here!
tylerf13ful 5 months ago
@tylerf13ful Go look at september clues b by simonshack cuz he makes a great put the news was in it evey fucking news made it CGI mostly cuz of the angles they made the 2nd plane go rather if its a backdrop a loop a nose in nose out rather if its a divebomber rather its its the wrong way the news was in it. even if its sound its still CGI one sound sounds like a filecambinet hiting south tower one sounds like bells hiting south tower and one had no impact sound at all.
Xxandrew01 4 months ago
@Xxandrew01 like i said there was 2 planes...no cgi
tylerf13ful 4 months ago
@tylerf13ful Well you tell that shit to the damn news morons like msnbc abc and fox news cuz there shooting the plane hit in angles that the other ones did not have like i said look at september clues b by simonshack.
Xxandrew01 4 months ago
You idiot, the camera was zoomed so far out that you couldn't possibly see it because it was only one or two pixels.
LEfriend 5 months ago
What about the hundred other videos of the plane hitting tower 2 then? Just cos this shitty quality, possibly photoshopped video, made it to light, doesn't make it true. And HOW far away is this shot?!?!
RachyRooM 5 months ago
youre fucking stupid
smokeatinfatkid19 5 months ago
fukin idiot u can see the plane in ure video yuh dik
jamboooooooooooooo1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gov. Dude 1: "Our plan is to destroy the World Trade Center towers. To hide our plan we're going to fake having planes crash into them. Of course then we'll need to make actual flights disappear so people think they crashed into the towers."
Gov. Dude 2: "Wait a sec, so we need to destroy the towers and make these planes and everyone on them disappear forever?"
Gov. Dude 1: "Yes."
Gov. Dude 2: "So... why not just actually crash the planes into the towers?"
Gov. Dude 1: "GTFO."
fireupontheearth 5 months ago
Comment removed
fireupontheearth 5 months ago
You say this has been banned "plenty of times" and yet here it is. All this proves is that you are a moron. What about the countless other videos that DO show the plane? I guess the government must have kidnapped all the people with cameras and edited their film to include a plane. To say nothing of the countless eye witnesses. 9/11 conspiracy theorists are grade A retards.
fireupontheearth 5 months ago
Comment removed
mrmigra 5 months ago
This proves you are retarded. God bless america
ghettowlettow 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is this guy saying? After all the video footage of both planes hitting, is he trying to say we did not see what we can go see over and over again? Is this guy also one of those who says the Holocaust never happened or that we never landed on the moon? Wow, dude, you have way too much time on your hands.
mikehouse75 5 months ago
What is this guy saying? After all the video footage of both planes hitting, is he trying to say we did not see what we can go see over and over again? Is this guy also one of those who says the Holocaust never happened or that we never landed on the moon? Wow, dude, you have way too much time on your hands.
mikehouse75 5 months ago
Tonydayna, you are one stupid motherfucker. Do the world a favor by not procreating.
falcoperegrinus82 5 months ago
how can someone even say that there wasn't a plane? I mean seriously? If you search any videos of the attacks you can clearly see a plane. This is a terrible view because you are miles a way trying to see a plane through a tiny camera.
LilComical10 5 months ago
No plane huh? That's why it specifically shows a plane hitting the 2nd tower on so many videos and on the news. If you still don't believe me search 2nd plane WTC you retarded asshole!
3Ballers1Dream 5 months ago
may be he is in the wrong angle!
FaroeSomething 5 months ago
Worst thing about youtube is that idiots get a voice
Scameron44 5 months ago 9
@Scameron44 rather you want to admit it or not. 9/11 was a inside job. There is so much compelling evidence.
psychoeyez 5 months ago
@psychoeyez you are completely retarded......
jsgcarlto 5 months ago
@Scameron44 do you mean the idiots who believe the official story??
bigbopper993 4 weeks ago
dickhead
Scameron44 5 months ago
you suck at editing. if you look closely you can see a black dot moving toward the building before the explosion at 0:16
Slaxl18 5 months ago
TonyDayna - Your warped beliefs and comments are nothing more than hate speech. You're no better than the maggot radical muslims who attacked us, and I for one am glad you will burn in hell next to them for the evil in your heart.
immunocop 5 months ago
fuck you......just fuck you...how dare you....@1NKxCH1LL...im so sorry..
R4wkFist 5 months ago
THE 2ND PLANE HIT THE BUILDING FROM BEHIND YOU CAN"T SEE IT FROM THE ANGLE UR LOOKING AT IT FROM FUCKING RETARDS
Rickey85 5 months ago
If you look at how the explosion came out of the building the 2nd plane hit from the back side of the south tower.
rivots 5 months ago
If there was no plane, how do you explain the fact that thousands of people were on the ground an witnesses such an event. What about all the news cameras filming live? You sure are gutsy to put this up and say there was no plane. How do you explain to the families who lost loved ones that what they went through wasn't real. It's there. You know it. I know it. We all know it. This was just a stupid excuse to put a video up and expect people to think you're some hero.
@1NKxCH1LL I'm sorry abou
TheNinjaCircus 5 months ago
full pan out cant catch a plane flying at 600 mph jackleg.
southern04man 5 months ago
your a dick , plane and simple a dick, get it ....plane!
ru5tynut 5 months ago
Drivers*
1NKxCH1LL 5 months ago
Comment removed
1NKxCH1LL 5 months ago 24
@1NKxCH1LL Then debunk it. Until then, I think you're full of shit, just like the rest of America that keeps trying to victimize themselves and act like they "saw" it, or "was there", or "were attacked by terrorst" and "must retaliate in the name of liberty"
Honestly, you are the FIRST person I've ever heard of having a relative on flight 175.
oknowiamdead 5 months ago
@oknowiamdead ill debunk it for you right now....SHITTY FUCKING CAMERA, ZOOMED ALL THE WAY OUT, MILES THE FUCK AWAY
Megadeth4242 5 months ago
@oknowiamdead hahahahahahahahaha, just watched it a few more times, maybe if you had your fucking eyes checked once in a fucking while you can see a black blurry object (the plane) coming at the building just before it impacts, it was a horrible attempt at editing
Megadeth4242 5 months ago
@1NKxCH1LL 2nd 1 was plane but first 1 wasnt......sory about your mother dude
londonsozzie 5 months ago
@londonsozzie your a fucking idiot, there is a video of the first plane hitting the first tower
Megadeth4242 5 months ago
@1NKxCH1LL YOU EXPECT ME TO BELIEVE THE FIRE IN THE TOWER WAS SO INTENSE THAT IT MELTED STEEL GIRDERS BUT YOUR MOMS DRIVERS LICENSE SURVIVED THE FIRE AND THE COLLAPSE?! YOUR A DOUCHBAG QUIT LYING!
SL8R71 5 months ago
@SL8R71 Your an idiot. They found plenty of items blown out of the building, because of the explosion on impact, that were not burned.
mikehouse75 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SL8R71 Your an idiot. They found plenty of items blown out of the building, because of the explosion on impact, that were not burned.
mikehouse75 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SL8R71 Your an idiot. They found plenty of items blown out of the building, because of the explosion on impact, that were not burned.
mikehouse75 5 months ago
@SL8R71 YOU FOOL, I BELIEVE THAT THERE WAS EXPLOSIVES, BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE WASN'T A PLANE. QUIT LYING?! LYING OF WHAT YOU SLIMY COCK SUCKING MORON!
1NKxCH1LL 5 months ago
That's like filming the ground with a cell phone camera from atop your house and saying there aren't any insects down below because you can't see them on the video when someone at ground level can clearly see them in person. Although here you can still just barely see the plane.
anklepantsmagazine 5 months ago
so people on that flight were ringing up their own families making that shit up that they were going to die? you wanker.
JayeMakeupxx 5 months ago
awkward moment when i can actually see the plane :/
thewildman97 5 months ago
at 240p you can't see shit lmfao.
kosovakillaz 5 months ago
Terrible angle and zoomed our too far to see an object. Witnesses saw the plane hit. People saw it LIVE on television. Are they all government shills?
jtkirkfan2002 5 months ago
TONYDAYNA, ARE U DIMENTED PAL?? What an idiot, have u only watched this video and nothin else on 9/11??
Just so I know that i'm readin u right, are u sayin no 2nd plane hits the 2nd tower??
rocky420227 5 months ago
There were enough people there. Stop this nonsense.
wesgleeson 5 months ago
I can see the plane.
PadzyFoley 5 months ago
Too far! You cant see plane so big distance
mikbraikku 5 months ago
Top 5 requirements to be a "truther."
1) Idiot
2) Liar
3) liberal
4) Crackhead
5) Never been laid
Honorable mention:
--------------------------
Basement dweller
LT1HILLINGHOE 6 months ago 4
@LT1HILLINGHOE how to be a sheeple?
believe to official information
how to be a truther?
fuck yourself
how to be a man?
search for information, make sure, believe to yourself, dont be american
SompnBrurl 5 months ago
@SompnBrurl Congragulations....you have mastered all 6 qualifications listed above. You are truly a dumbass truther.
The end.
LT1HILLINGHOE 5 months ago
@LT1HILLINGHOE thanks.
you just proven you are a gay sheep
SompnBrurl 5 months ago
@SompnBrurl No thanks needed extra chromsome boy.
I am a homosapien. You, on the other hand are a homosexual. What makes it even worse is that you posess all of those other six aforementioned traits of a truther and that just gets under your skin and rubs you the wrong way lol.
Now I will Flush you back to where you belong, homosexual truther!!!
LT1HILLINGHOE 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LT1HILLINGHOE how do i know you are american?
SompnBrurl 5 months ago
@LT1HILLINGHOE Wrong about Liberal. Alex Jones is a Libertarian Conservative, and many Truthers are Ron Paul fans.
DiverseLA 2 months ago
@DiverseLA I'm not wrong about anything. And I am a Conservative Republican...not some idiot libertarian. I don't doubt that some idiot truther is a space cadet libertarian Ron Paul fan. Ron Paul may run under the Republican banner for President, but he is a libertarian. Most Republicans consider paul to be a stupid space cadet with an irritating girly voice. Thanks.
LT1HILLINGHOE 2 months ago
Have a research on youtube first !!
all angles view of the second plane!!
watch?v=DoE8Uz2ia3M&feature=related
tellyho 6 months ago
You actually CAN see it flying through the grain of this video. You have to remember this is back in a time when people were still using TAPES. This may be digital, and if you recall the quality was terrible until about 2 years ago.
InsurgentLove 6 months ago
It's flagrantly dishonest to ignore the other 20 camera angles showing the plane.
dorbie 6 months ago
god you suck tony danza!
mediblue9 6 months ago
You can actually make out the approaching plane close to the building just before it hits. Of course it's very difficult due to the wide camera view and horribly compressed video. Having made up your mind before viewing the video also makes it hard to see.
potrzebie74 6 months ago
i think there was a second plane. it would be pretty hard to get all the people who video taped the attack on the second tower to agree on editing a plane into them. andd news channels who were doing a live feed even saw the plane. and it seems kind of weird to base the reality of a plane on one video taken from across town.
thegirlwiththehair1 6 months ago
no plane just a holograph.....
neilzep 6 months ago
Its a pretty interesting insight into the human brain.. that even somthing that was being watched by 100s of thousands of people AT THE SCENE and millions of people on TV would be some kind of conspiricy. Pretty hillarious.. or is it sad?
Holysnowva 6 months ago
@Holysnowva so you're saying that we should believe everything we see and take it at face value without question? That's the most ignorant thing I've read here yet. You work for the government, or are you just mentally bankrupt?
onepoundpull 6 months ago
@Holysnowva I got money on sad.
TheRevJonnyNemo 6 months ago
The only thing this video is proof of is the fact that you should not have access to the internet.
TMusic5 7 months ago
This is another Zionist Bullshit !!!
nfexp 7 months ago
@nfexp y r u saying that?
RedFans1 7 months ago
dude, are you really serious, or are you just an asshole. 911 was a conspiracy, i know that, but theres 100's of angles and people screaming and people saw the fucking plane you douche bag
tylerf13ful 9 months ago
I and half my family saw the plane with our own eyes go all the way into the building.
TheFirebird32 9 months ago
Most of us are not as stupid as you are suggesting...distant angle covered by black smoke...your not fooling anyone
nwobuster75 9 months ago
how many times does this backward moron say "shit" "fuck" or "fuckin'"??
What a tool
paulbunions 9 months ago
asshole!
TubaJoe100 9 months ago
I saw it.
metallfluss 9 months ago
You're an idiot. Millions of people saw it and hundreds of cameras filmed it.
WillShakespeare2007 9 months ago
Yes, you can actualy see the second plane, it appears as a dark smear just below the smokebefore it hits. Its there watch it over and over, its very small from this angle.
sweet6b9 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You also think we never landed on the moon either, and probably that the government is controlled by aliens. Come on, you can admit it...
rushius 10 months ago
wow.. wrong angle, nuff said.
Going by all other footage I've seen, this camera is at such the perfect angle (almost nearly in front of the opposite side of the point of impact) so that you can't see any 'object' hit the tower.
luxiniv320 10 months ago
you just zoomed out to much xD
95Stuffi 10 months ago
Enough with your fuckin nonsense... I was there! And it was a plane you morons! Rocket my ass. It's a plane going 550mph!
rgklopfer 10 months ago
Comment removed
rgklopfer 10 months ago
this looks so exillerating i wish i was there fucking terrorists bastards
tylerf13ful 10 months ago
hard to beleive it was a decade ago
tylerf13ful 10 months ago
FUCK who ever says there was a plane that hits.
your all illuminati fucks! reptilian mother fuckers.
FUCK ALL OF YOU KUNT DIE MOTHER FUCKER DIE!!
siomaybakar 10 months ago
@siomaybakar The only reptile I like is the one from mortal kombat
the rest can get their blue blooded brains blown the fuck up
TheHazcam 10 months ago
Um, maybe because its, 1: a bad angle. 2:not the best of quality. and 3:he zoomed out as far as possible exactly before it hit.
fiddlesti5 10 months ago
Look VERY closely at 0:14, you can see a tiny black dot.
g1234538 10 months ago
I watched with my own eyes live the second plane hit. WTF are you talking about no second plane?
dankcincy 10 months ago
I don't think that you need to say "there wasn't a second plain" in order to suggest that it was in-fact a conspiracy behind these attacks. We all know that, but there was a second plain in-spite of that. Your video is just from an angle where the building is hiding the plain.
IamEyalMarcosLevit 10 months ago
@IamEyalMarcosLevit plane***
Tradiition 10 months ago
@Tradiition Yeah I know I realized too late. I just left it like that.
IamEyalMarcosLevit 10 months ago
fuckin pathetic u loser
AJice1980 10 months ago
The thing that doesn't make sense (at all) is the "pancaking" of the buildings. I read somewhere that an American society of scientists & demolition experts managed to prove in a court in California that those buildings could not have collapsed the way they did unaided. That those plane impacts and subsequently the fire could not bring those buildings down in that manner.
videoeditors 11 months ago
you are fucking sick.
antagonising 11 months ago
U can see it passing from left to right, who said it can't be seen? The quality of the image is so bad you can't distinguish a plane, but I can see a "shadow" moving at the time of the explosion.
zappasoul 11 months ago
guys, leave it...
its history, and let it remain that way...
hbolle00 11 months ago
millions watched a second plane hit. it is real!
dprice017 11 months ago
they just filmed from other side
daigongs 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 Was an inside job. Rate UP for the truth!~
watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM
MrJoesalerno 11 months ago
911 Was an inside job. Rate UP for the truth!~
/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM
MrJoesalerno 11 months ago
@tonydayna at 0:18 sec I can see where you edited it fools...Get a life you fuck sticks... I have ((Powerdirector<~~editing)) software also **SiGhS*
ljbew 11 months ago
Claims such as "no plane hit the tower" can only discredit the legitimate 9-11 truth movement which puts forth observations more akin to "two airplane impacts could not have brought three buildings down through the paths of most resistance at free-fall speed and almost entirely into their own footprints".
kmmorris85 11 months ago
if you see it in full screen you can kind of see something moving in that path :S
BarcaBosch 1 year ago
Idiotic!
peoplewhodrinkable 1 year ago
moron
AgothInnCloth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
at the 016 mark there is an object just at the front edge of that dark building next to the tower.look real close and pause the video in steps....
rdety 1 year ago
at the 014 mark there is an object just at the front edge of that dark building next to the tower.look real close and pause the video in steps....
rdety 1 year ago
You hava a funny idea of what proof means. On one hand you have 50+ videos from various unconnected sources, all clearly showing a place hit the second building. On the other we have your proof, one crappy quality youtube clips shot from miles away and in wide angle. You do not have the burden of proof, you have nothing.
even the people filming say "they hit it again"
JRTayl0r 1 year ago
Yea clearly there isn't a plane, thats the worst quality tape out of all the shots of that plane going into the building, plus there are over a dozen more angles of the plane going in, and people were in the streets when they saw that plane, this was a fake so this asshole would get views
residentevilfreakk55 1 year ago
there was no planes at all or any missiles, the towers fell because of explosives planted in the towers. and as for the reason why this would happen, it was because bush wanted to go to war in afganistan. if you want proof about this watch loose change
jasonsummerdennis1 1 year ago
for a start why would the government fake 911 and two i think that you are sad person with no life or morals
curtiscurt 1 year ago
@curtiscurt If you feel this is fake, why hang out?
1961slam 1 year ago
watch?v=Ms9GAOhjJNo
mjeramusicpro 1 year ago
Yeah I'm pretty sure there was a second plane.. watch youtube more often and you'll see it legit.
rileeiilee 1 year ago
of course there was a second plane. DO NOT get suckered into this type of disinformation. There are way to many eye witness accounts. There were 3 planes that all hit buildings on 9/11. If you think one video is the only perspective, you need to go through the eye witness testimony. This no planes junk is BS to distract you from the real truth.
kdubjbass 1 year ago
@kdubjbass there are other videos out there that prove this
biloretard 1 year ago
@kdubjbass "3 planes hit the wtc" here that lol what an idiot , man , just wake up
stewox1 1 year ago
Shitty angle, I've seen dozens of videos which show the plane hit the building, and most of them were filmed by people in their homes. I'm pretty sure that those people didn't have a way to edit those videos. THERE WAS A SECOND PLANE!!!
danecook321 1 year ago 22
@danecook321 dude dont you know that it has been proved that the second plane never actually hit
IT HAS BEEN PROVED !!! :D :D :D
kirantsh 1 year ago
@kirantsh muslim bullshit
gunzcontrol 11 months ago
@danecook321 Find a link to those if u can please, I want to see them.
DBIceWolf 11 months ago
@danecook321
How do you know for a fact that they were filmed by people in their homes, and not the perpetrators themselves scattered around the city with cameras "documenting" the event (as some of the Israeli Mossad agents who were actually detained on 911, but let go by Zionist Chertoff the next day).
retiredaxmurderer 7 months ago
@retiredaxmurderer Really? You don't think one person in NY that day, other than the "perpetrators themselves," got their camera out and recorded what was going down then posted it on YouTube or elsewhere? Even if those videos got edited by others, you don't think just one person kept their hard copy, or testimony as proof and posted it again and again when necessary? It's irrational to think that there are no actual amateur civilian videos of 9/11.
JustinLB82 7 months ago
Who took tis shot?
MLMProspectPros 1 year ago
It used to be that nutjobs stayed in the attic where they belonged. Then along came the internet and gave them a voice. Sheesh.
CAL2177 1 year ago
@CAL2177 actually the plane hits were hollywood cgi special effects. The towers were hit with missles.
2Baiforev 1 year ago
@2Baiforev ah I see, so hollywood is in on it now too. would it not have been simpler to let everyone see missiles hitting the buildings and blame it on some rogue agent? oh for fuck sakes, now I sound as stupid as the nut cases.
halfglassed 1 year ago
Your right, there was no plane that hit tower 2. It has been proven, that a faulty snow-cone maker in the lobby was drawing to much power and shorted out, causing the explosion.
Asshole.
sethy2004 1 year ago
Rexem96 thinks that if it was a conspiracy (killing thousands of people) in order to invade a country killing millions more directly or indirectly, this is fine if it was done to get oil to use to drive cars. Is his name Wolfowitz or Rockefeller I wonder? Any decent person would never feel that way obviously.
Pete19782007 1 year ago
have you actually figured out that the flight path of the boeing was behind the WTC from that angle, or is that to much for your brain cell?
NScott45 1 year ago
I know there was conspiracy involve somewhere in this debacle...however to say that a second plane was never involved at that scene is dishonest and digraceful, especially since I saw it with my own two eyes.
hulk12078 1 year ago
if it was a conspiracy, it was done for a good fucking reason. not so bush could become rich off of this. it was done for our best interest.
and btw, there were thousands of tapes that caught this on camera. SO YEAH, CHANCES ARE THAT THERE WAS ONE THAT DIDNT CATCH THE PLANE
Rexem96 1 year ago
@Rexem96 That's a disgraceful comment.
Pete19782007 1 year ago
you are so fucking stupid rofl. if the government was going to plan something that insane, on such a huge scale, they would have flown a real plane into the building. why the fuck not?
and you people are such stupid fucks. if the government is behind this, then what was done was done for our best interest you stupid fucks. if you don't like this, then stop driving your fucking cars and using the oil that this event produced. dumb shits.
stop crying about whether this was real or not.
Rexem96 1 year ago
@Rexem96 Stop posting with insult's. If you disagree, waste no more of your time looking at these clip's.
1961slam 1 year ago
you people are idiots, no second plane?? you are beyond ridiculous. honestly, whith this video and you are trying to prove what?? come on inspector gadget I think its time for a new career
javierslamadrid 1 year ago
Must admit... it looks like a missile
rhylmart 1 year ago
I forgot to add that YOU NEED TO view it in FULL SCREEN in order to see that object.
LookMaNoBrains 1 year ago 5
To be honest, you can see something like a plane (or Whatever) coming in at 0:15 slightly above the 3 build from left of the 2nd World Trade tower. But this video should NEVER be deleted by youtube. Its an important footage in American History.
LookMaNoBrains 1 year ago 2
Wow all those people on the ground having a mass delusion about a second plane before the explosion, not to mention all those government paid people taking video including live television - they employ some super-fast video editors these days I guess. Either that or the few pushing the "no planes" lines are the delusional ones...
ferrett78 1 year ago
BULL SHIT disinfo to poison the well.
McGanhanSkjellyfetti 1 year ago
I see the plane. What are you talking about?
jnap818 1 year ago
Man r u blind i can clearly see it jus before ur gimpy comment apears ,you can see it flying just over that black building on the left at round 16 seconds ,full screen it if you still cant see it
MrRonin45enator 1 year ago
omg the people video'ing it are talking about a plane or rocket hitting it... duh... choosing to ignore all the other vid's which show the plane are we? (which we all know anyway)... and ummm... i watched it live and saw the plane fly in...so ummm watcha gotta saya abouta thata??? actually i cant even belive im commenting on this crap...pfttt...
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster At first he said there must be a bomb in it, then later he talked about seeing a fast 'missile or something' if I'm not mistaken.
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@Pete19782007 haha... you are mistaken. he says "they're fucking bombing it" and im sure he talks of a missile because its naturally hard to believe a large passenger plane would fly into the building. either way he's throwing out a hypothesis '6 secs' after the event took place. and, actually watching this vid again now, i can actually see the plane flying into it. look real close (although i guess others will argue this is the missile) the pop up distracts it, look closer 2 the building
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster Maybe he says bombing it rather than 'bomb in it' (maybe)but I still can't make out what he's saying clearly - I don't think he says they're f***ing bombing it though, sounds more like we're f***ing bombing it though that wouldn't make sense. Dunno. I also can't tell what she says at about 1.01 after saying Jesus Christ - was that ----? (don't think it was "was that real"?). She said 'that wasn't a plane' anyhow but could've been a guess. Can see either plane,missile or fake plane.
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@Pete19782007 well its quite clear he says "they're fucking bombing it"... i dunno what she says after "jesus christ" either... but i dont know why this isrelevant (?) the point of this video is to show nothing hit the second building... (i cant actually believe im still arguing against this... its pathetic) so they used a plane for the first building but not the second (?!) when they whole world would be watching they chose to use a bomb (?!) pathetic
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster Yeah I don't think it's gonna achieve much for us to deate this point to be honest, but I honestly still don't think it's clear that he says 'they're fucking bombing it'. They also react when the building explodes, not about 4 seconds earlier when the black object first appears - just to clarify I did mean to write I can see a plane, missile or fake plane (the smudge you mentioned which could I guess be any of those things). Can people thumbs up your comment if he did say what you say
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@Pete19782007 i hate it when i mean to write cant but leave off the 't'. not only does it mean you didnt say what you wanted to say but you actually say the opposite. i think you mean to say you "cant" see a plane missile or fake plane yeah? firstly the narrators talk of having just seen something hit it, a plane or rocket. that should be your first clue, second look for a little black smudge moving towards the building just before the explosion. its definitely there and obvious once you see it
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster We can probably leave this debate (spelling corrected!) so as not to annoy each other or others with small details. I just always thought he'd said there was a bomb in it then when I saw your initial comment I thought I'd noticed a contradiction/anomoly in his words (which wouldn't have to be sinister). When you sad you saw the plane live did you mean on TV? If not, did you recognise it as the commercial plane or too far away/too quick? Thanks
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@Pete19782007 I was in London and we were watching it live on TV at work. i saw a small black thing flying around and thought it was a news helicopter... then another girl said "cor look at the one, thats bloody low as well isnt it?" and then, bang! straight in it went. building 2 should obviously have been evacuated in hindsight, but the govt is not responsible for this. before the 2nd plane hit this was just a horrible accident. anything like this happens now and the whole city is evacuated
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster OK, I understand why you think what you saw was genuine, and maybe it was. Which station were you watching, do you remember? Have you seen the same footage on Youtube? One theory is that the fake planes would be aired on TV as if they were live - if you haven't watched September Clues it might be worth a look. Of course, they could be real planes but not the commercial airliners, they could be the commercial airliners but the inside jb perpertrators could've also destroyed WTC etc
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@Pete19782007 i havent heard of septemberclues before. i just looked it up... i could watch it i thought. but the very first thing it says is regarding the media's involvement and says "The operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-generated version of reality" omg! that is so pathetic, needless to say im not gonna bother with septemberclues anymore. alot of consp theorists shoot themselves in the foot because they are really just focused on shock value rather than the truth
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster or they at least start out with "its a conspiracy" and work their way backwards to try and find evidence to back that up... they then end up finding what they are looking for because they want to find it... not because it is real (sorry to patronize good conspiracy theorists out there...)
kroqster 1 year ago
@kroqster OK, kroqster thanks for the discussion. If you watch any part of September Clues at all, I might suggest the 'nose out' clip. It's true Bush did nothing really and claimed later to have seen the 1st plane hit on TV and thought it was a terrible pilot (bad joke considering what happened on day and what then happened to innocent Afghanistani/Iraqi children etc). NORAD re: Cheney I think. Seems unlikely buildings should've collapsed so quick from plane impact though. Also see PNAC.
Pete19782007 1 year ago
@kroqster But don't forget in terms of evacuating the building, hijackings were known about and Air Traffic Control/NEADS could presumably see 2nd plane (even if unidentifiable without a transpnder signal) approaching New York. Even starting to evacuate would put people from the top floors low enough within a couple of minutes. There was a Port Authorty announcement not to evacuate.
Pete19782007 1 year ago