what i never understand is how people can watch movies on a daily basis, sf, action.. all of that. do they think that stuff was filmed on location? harry potter? starwars? shows like NCIS, weve seen the craziest stuff in movies. yet its to farfetched to create footage like this?! i mean wtf. those alien movies dont have prop UFOS its all computers. this would be EASY to make. i believe there were some sort of planes tho. but thats based on tv and other media. big drones maybe?.....
hey divizor, thanks for the comment. the thing is, this is the hezarkhani footage, it was one of the first to be broadcast of the amateur shots, but it matches the live shots perfectly in terms of angle, position etc, as well as basically every witness report. combined with there being no anomolies at all in the videos, i think the videos are all real. whether they were remote guided i don't know yet, THAT technology was available, and displayed on a 727 by Raytheon in August. 2001
@diviz0r Yes, our evil overlords froze time, found *everyone* who was filming at the time, took their cameras back to their secret studios, then spent thousands of hours of frozen time doctoring every single camera's footage so they all matched, returned everyone's cameras back to their hands, used the Men In Black "flashy thingys" to tell the thousands of people that watched it happen that it was actually a plane, then unfroze time.
Hollow aluminum airplanes don't fly through steel beams. If you dropped steel beems from the sky and they landed on a parked airplane, its obvious the result would be a completely flattened airplane. The "airplane" videos the media aired were obvious fakes. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES or 911 TABOO and wake up people.
if a thin peice of metal can stop a bullet at 2000 m/h the trade center would have gave some resistance at least to the hollow tip. Instead we see the plane flying through the building as if it were made of a mesh screen.
no id be expecting a a mess of the side of the wtc, like random assortments of holes and debri. The air plane would not go directly into te building after impact, and keep its shape.
There's zero evidence for it. Mainly because it broke up on impact, but if you have some unknown footage from INSIDE the WTC showing the plane keeping its shape after impact, i will gladly stand corrected.
No such footage exists, so best of luck with that.
Brokenstyx and Achimspok united at last! In both cases sophisticated analyses with one aim: add creditbility to the 9/11 TV and "amateur" footage. Wingtip to wingtip impact holes? And who was flying these planes with such precision? IMPOSSIBLE, thus faked footage.
my point was in response to claims that there was no reflection in the WTC in the hezarkhani video, which is clearly not true.
you're right, it doesn't prove its authenticity, but that wasn't really the point of the video. but i'd understand you being touchy, what with no-plane arguments dropping allover the place, and no evidence to support them.
oh no, wait - you said this video is a fake, right? cool, then YOU must have evidence!
feel free to post it in response to this comment ^_^
the left wing of the plane dissapears as it passes in front of the orange building at the left. and as every1 can see, the plane goes into the building without doing any damage on it's wall. it's clear at all.
Bro I've been looking for a comment like yours for a while now. Can you tell me the best way to confirm the location of that Athletic Club in relation to the WTC? I can't find the proper maps lol
The easiest way is Google Earth. You can set pins on the corners of the WTC foundation (still visible) put the pins at the proper height and expand it to the ground. Now you can see the outline of the towers in the 3D view. Just be aware that the building models are not very precise but this method should be good enough for 90% of all questions.
whatever. there's a reflection in the video. whatever happened on 911, the hezarkhani video has a reflection. my only point in this video is that claiming there is no reflection in the hezarkhani video is false, and can not be used as an argument for no-planes.
the video is a miltary fake ,people in new york didn't see a plane but only a flash for few secs this is enough to trick the mind easliy done, the sound was created by the not birds screaming a high pitch noise
the photos came from the same source just rotated to give the impression there was lots off amateurs taken pictures
and theres footage missing from the nypd chopper that was only showed on your tv that day and is now missing i wonder why!! it showed a dark object didn't look like a plane to me.
planes were all done from a studio whats so hard to understand about that? and michal herzecani and carmen talyor are bullshiters i see she's leading you on in jeffs forum, there not even good liers
ask her, if she took a picture of a plane insert while she was watching her 42 inch plasma tv with her amazing crappy camera.
Whoever believes that terrorists didn't fly planes into the towers is a moron. Conspiracy theorists crack me up.
jreaton003 9 months ago
what i never understand is how people can watch movies on a daily basis, sf, action.. all of that. do they think that stuff was filmed on location? harry potter? starwars? shows like NCIS, weve seen the craziest stuff in movies. yet its to farfetched to create footage like this?! i mean wtf. those alien movies dont have prop UFOS its all computers. this would be EASY to make. i believe there were some sort of planes tho. but thats based on tv and other media. big drones maybe?.....
diviz0r 10 months ago
@diviz0r
hey divizor, thanks for the comment. the thing is, this is the hezarkhani footage, it was one of the first to be broadcast of the amateur shots, but it matches the live shots perfectly in terms of angle, position etc, as well as basically every witness report. combined with there being no anomolies at all in the videos, i think the videos are all real. whether they were remote guided i don't know yet, THAT technology was available, and displayed on a 727 by Raytheon in August. 2001
brokenstyx 10 months ago
@diviz0r Yes, our evil overlords froze time, found *everyone* who was filming at the time, took their cameras back to their secret studios, then spent thousands of hours of frozen time doctoring every single camera's footage so they all matched, returned everyone's cameras back to their hands, used the Men In Black "flashy thingys" to tell the thousands of people that watched it happen that it was actually a plane, then unfroze time.
You're right. That's much more plausible.
ProtusMose 5 months ago
is this clip from CNN only or did other networks have the same clip?
bucknorm 10 months ago
@MarijuanaMichelle
people saw the plane. please consider the witnesses. maybe even try to speak to one.
brokenstyx 1 year ago
@2010Clicker
lol thanks! i'd never even heard it before i made this video, now i know the words off-by-heart and it always reminds me of 175 :(
brokenstyx 1 year ago
Oh, sure, that plane didn't really hit the tower. It was all faked by the CIA.
Christ...
KaitainCPS 1 year ago
reflections get closer as something nears touching.....
b1cc2 1 year ago
Of course there's no evidence, it was destroyed by your all so trusted gov.
(:
bryannniiizurietaTV 2 years ago
Hollow aluminum airplanes don't fly through steel beams. If you dropped steel beems from the sky and they landed on a parked airplane, its obvious the result would be a completely flattened airplane. The "airplane" videos the media aired were obvious fakes. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES or 911 TABOO and wake up people.
hankwheels 2 years ago
767s aren't hollow, and only the outside is aluminium.
Your analogy is wrong as the various parts and contents of the plane had the momentum on 911, not the WTC.
Watch September Clues. Go ahead. Look into any of its points and make up your own mind. It won't take too long.
brokenstyx 2 years ago
if a thin peice of metal can stop a bullet at 2000 m/h the trade center would have gave some resistance at least to the hollow tip. Instead we see the plane flying through the building as if it were made of a mesh screen.
gordonculp 2 years ago
you have no proof the plane passed intact through the outer wall.
the "hollow tip" was decimated on impact - what would you have expected it to do? bounced off in one piece?
brokenstyx 2 years ago
no but the hole in the building is like a cookie cutter of an airplane, it surged right on through andbroke a part inside the building
gordonculp 2 years ago
its not like a cookie-cutter of an airplane, but, surprise surprise, it is in the rough shape of a plane.
maybe you'd have expected a train-shaped hole, or a bus-shaped hole?
brokenstyx 2 years ago
no id be expecting a a mess of the side of the wtc, like random assortments of holes and debri. The air plane would not go directly into te building after impact, and keep its shape.
gordonculp 2 years ago
So the airplane kept its shape after impact?
How are you going to prove that?
There's zero evidence for it. Mainly because it broke up on impact, but if you have some unknown footage from INSIDE the WTC showing the plane keeping its shape after impact, i will gladly stand corrected.
No such footage exists, so best of luck with that.
x
brokenstyx 2 years ago
September Clues FTW!
ImyManz99 2 years ago
A video that makes sense.. thank God!
Made in Britain too.. hussar!
Truthers are morons!
MarcusBritish 2 years ago
Brokenstyx and Achimspok united at last! In both cases sophisticated analyses with one aim: add creditbility to the 9/11 TV and "amateur" footage. Wingtip to wingtip impact holes? And who was flying these planes with such precision? IMPOSSIBLE, thus faked footage.
drumcode911 2 years ago 2
you could watch september clues and so many videos on youtube trying to demonstrate the fake theory.
jesudel 2 years ago
september clues?!
LOLOLOLOLOL
brokenstyx 2 years ago
this analisys is absurd. this video is a fake, so any reflections are also faked, and that's all.
jesudel 2 years ago
hello.
my point was in response to claims that there was no reflection in the WTC in the hezarkhani video, which is clearly not true.
you're right, it doesn't prove its authenticity, but that wasn't really the point of the video. but i'd understand you being touchy, what with no-plane arguments dropping allover the place, and no evidence to support them.
oh no, wait - you said this video is a fake, right? cool, then YOU must have evidence!
feel free to post it in response to this comment ^_^
brokenstyx 2 years ago
the left wing of the plane dissapears as it passes in front of the orange building at the left. and as every1 can see, the plane goes into the building without doing any damage on it's wall. it's clear at all.
it's a fake. a computer degenerated video.
it's my opinion.
greetings from Spain.
jesudel 2 years ago
"the left wing of the plane dissapears as it passes in front of the orange building at the left"
no it doesn't.
greetings from earth.
brokenstyx 2 years ago
btw the plane passed behind the Downtown Athletics Club and that building is not transparent. So the wing really should disappeare for a moment.
achimspok 2 years ago
achimspok
Bro I've been looking for a comment like yours for a while now. Can you tell me the best way to confirm the location of that Athletic Club in relation to the WTC? I can't find the proper maps lol
Thanks again large!
babywithanailgun 2 years ago
What do you need? Then Long/Lat?
The easiest way is Google Earth. You can set pins on the corners of the WTC foundation (still visible) put the pins at the proper height and expand it to the ground. Now you can see the outline of the towers in the 3D view. Just be aware that the building models are not very precise but this method should be good enough for 90% of all questions.
achimspok 2 years ago
hologram plane not thin air but from a studio
nanoprobe73 2 years ago
whatever. there's a reflection in the video. whatever happened on 911, the hezarkhani video has a reflection. my only point in this video is that claiming there is no reflection in the hezarkhani video is false, and can not be used as an argument for no-planes.
brokenstyx 2 years ago
the video is a miltary fake ,people in new york didn't see a plane but only a flash for few secs this is enough to trick the mind easliy done, the sound was created by the not birds screaming a high pitch noise
sonic weapon.
nanoprobe73 2 years ago
do you think all the videos were military fakes?
some show the plane for a lot more than a few seconds.
do you think all the photos were military fakes as well?
brokenstyx 2 years ago
not all videos 99%
the real amateurs videos are always cut
the naudet 1st image is a real object
the photos came from the same source just rotated to give the impression there was lots off amateurs taken pictures
and theres footage missing from the nypd chopper that was only showed on your tv that day and is now missing i wonder why!! it showed a dark object didn't look like a plane to me.
nanoprobe73 2 years ago
"the real amateurs videos are always cut"
could you expand on this?
also, if the NYPD chopper caught an object, why would this shot not be edited or whatever you believe?
how does your "99%" of videos statement account for the live videos that show a plane?
brokenstyx 2 years ago
we bob and bri caroline dries and a couple of camera planet ones evan fairbanks chopper 4 on the archives versons
the chopper was using a hand held camera pointing at the object coming in from the sky it baffles me why it was never seen again.
nanoprobe73 2 years ago
"we bob and bri caroline dries and a couple of camera planet ones evan fairbanks chopper 4 on the archives versons"
have you got ANY evidence for ANY of these being fake?
brokenstyx 2 years ago
i sayed their real!! missing the planes
evan fairbanks obviously has been editied to include a plane but his video does show real footage when hes running away etc.
nanoprobe73 2 years ago
how exactly has evan fairbanks' video "obviously been edited to include a plane"?
the world awaits......
brokenstyx 2 years ago
?? a hologram from a studio?. what the fukk are you talking about?
genghis6l99 2 years ago
planes were all done from a studio whats so hard to understand about that? and michal herzecani and carmen talyor are bullshiters i see she's leading you on in jeffs forum, there not even good liers
ask her, if she took a picture of a plane insert while she was watching her 42 inch plasma tv with her amazing crappy camera.
nanoprobe73 2 years ago