What a garbage comparison, try using a actual case, actual cooling system and some ram that isn't garbage. The 6990 cards will shit on and out perform its competitor.
@tymonster187 the reason why cases have a cooling system is because the case is the main culprit for increase of temperatures. Also if you really want a cooling system for gpus then a good lcs would be the thing to get. Plus the ram isn't garbage, how did you get that conclusion?
Most of the video talks and talks about.. basically nothing. So what I could translate is: "I have this expensive bunch of stuff all put together to play a game. Here are some random numbers about how powerful it is (WAY too much for.. anything). "
@Anima87 Yee, but still i find this 2way sli nothing more!. 4x 590 *if possible* would be quad in my opinion. But apparently that will be DualQuad SLI xd!
Not genuine. That sucks because now-a-days if you buy a copy of windows you can only activate it like once then it blacklists it or you have to call in which can take forever with D is for dog bullcrap. But I bet you have a paid version.
Next, ATi has had serious problems in my experience. I think GeForce cards all-around work better, especially under load and overclocking (ATi caused all the xbox red rings of death, and ps3s have nvidia, with problems being rare)
@darknessofkrish In Most cases Drivers..Games with the Nvidia Branding have uneeded Code that slows down AMD cards and Games with the AMD branding has uneeded code that slows the Nvidia , Metro2033 is Raw Graphics with out any Extra added Protocalls that favor the GPU drivers, you will see this go back and forth. this current generation of games Had Nvidia branding and the Next generation will be AMD. game developers and Hardware developers switch contracts back and forth. there is no best brand
@websterboyHD You won't get a response... Though if you ask me the AMD Radeon HD 6950 2GB is the best for a 2gb card, though you might have to go up to about £190-£200 for a 6950. If you want a 560 however, and are only using one monitor (which I highly suspect you are) I recommend you just get a 1GB 560 ti, more precisly the Asus GTX560 Direct CU-II on Amazon UK, Which only costs £166 at the moment. If you want to save even more money go for my GPU, the Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 1GB
SLI = scaleable link interface... Nvidias method for connecting 2 or more video CARDS together for producing a single output..... it does however say that dual GPU cards use on board SLI hmmmmm I learned something today......thanx guys and PEACE to AL
@BhunaBhuna did i call you names ? i think not..... Hmmmmm I think this needs a new term then. Isn't SLI the function of connection? so would this not be dual SLI with dual core cards? I'm just wondering.....
Oh and Bhuna......I don't need you opinion TANX <:o)
@MoldytoasterMedia So true:D But if you're insinuating that graphics is all PC gaming is good for then you are dead wrong. They also have a host of options as far as gameplay and features are concerned, that consoles do not have access to.
There is a difference between seeing still images as motion instead of individual frames, and that happens somewhere around 24fps and not being able to see the difference past a certain point. truth is your eyes don't have an fps they don't see the world like that so of course you can tell the difference. but keep in mind, 60fps will look much smoother then 100fps if you only have a 60hz monitor
The average human eye surpasses 100fps, in which it sees, and it can detect a difference between say 20 to 50 fps or 50 to 100. It's just that it gets harder to notice as the frame rate of the becomes more alike to the frames per second of which you see.
so ok i cant understand this: i have a sapphire hd 6950 and on crysis 2 on ultra i get 90 fps whereas here he gets 44.2 fps with 2 6990's o_O wtf? and i do have an older sony display where i run them at 1200x1024 (or something like that) but does that really change the fps THAT much?! o_O
I did the same thing on my ASUS board, the 16x slots are further apart on the rampage iv, which normally would be a good thing, unfortunately, that puts the bottom gpu (gtx 580) directly over one of the motherboard fans. Not a real big deal, it has about 1/4 of fan still exposed.
@zomgwtfbbqbagel The actuality behind it is that you can't see over 30fps, HOWEVER the blur is greatly reduced at grater fps. The other side of it is that the human eye is not a machine and can't be synced with the display. Therefore higher fps increases the likelihood that you will see a sold frame. The more fps, the less time any one frame takes to be displayed.
@zomgwtfbbqbagel@TheLarhf I never said said that you can't tell the difference. Try Reading all of what a person says next time. Its a lot more complicated than JUST fps; I personally look at it from a physics point of view. The term fps confuses the issue, I always like to refer to it as hertz as it makes it fit into physics better for me. I would go into very detailed specifics but I know the audience here doesn't really care.
@zomgwtfbbqbagel As future electrician, in theory we have thought that lightbulb flashes 50 times per second (due Finland's 50Hz electricity network, in USA they have 60Hz so 60 times per second flashes), so if you could actually see 60 frames per second, you would see flashing lights and stuff like that.
@FireSqy i know for a fact my eyes can see upwards of 60 fps, but on top of that, i can feel much smoother the game runs even if i cant see it, i can feel the difference between 150 and 300 fps in cod. The mouse and movemetns and everyhting just happens so much smoother and easier.
@klooger28 Prove it. You see flashing lights? No. Then your eyes can't see upwards of 60 fps. And cause we are all humans and have very close skills, it impossible. And no screen is over 120Hz (or at least 200Hz). So it doesn't even refreshes the screen 300 times per second. So stop trolling.
@FireSqy you obviously have no idea what your talking about. My screen is only 60hz so yes i am only seeing 60 fps, but the gameplay itself happening behind the screen is far smoother, im not using my eyes to detect the difference above 150 fps, but it is definately there
@zomgwtfbbqbagel On a normal LCD/LED monitor you CANNOT physically see 100fps because the refresh rate on the monitor prevents more than 60fps from appearing on the screen.
@Dirxano That's not true at all. First off the more light there is the higher FPS your eye can "see" if it's dark you "see" less FPS. The human eye can detect well over 200 FPS provided there is ample light. So please stop spreading misinformation.
@desiGnampthia The Nvidia 590 and the AMD 6990 are the top models of the generations, and are "dual-core" GPUs. Todays computers can't handle more than 4 GPU cores, so this is max possible.
now do this except with quad radeon 7770 ghz editions in crossfire :D
DarkEmoE 16 hours ago
The 6990 is a noisy card!
BluesmanOC 1 day ago
...I don't like you
serltkughersliugh 1 day ago
Its amazing to look 2 same graphic cards *__*
pankraGaming 1 day ago
how about some on screen physical proof for someone that is not showing bias... GG
MegaD347H 1 day ago
what if you put an Nvidia card with a AMD card XD will it blend?
kingnutty109 2 days ago
@kingnutty109 No
XProffrinkX 7 hours ago
Where did you get the power supply from?
LLOYD19851012 2 days ago
What a garbage comparison, try using a actual case, actual cooling system and some ram that isn't garbage. The 6990 cards will shit on and out perform its competitor.
tymonster187 2 days ago
@tymonster187 nothing like that should have any impact.... minus what you think is an actual "cooling system"
steamhgarrett 2 days ago
@tymonster187 yeah, so you're saying a case will make your video cards faster. dumbest comment ever
theryaner 1 day ago
@tymonster187 the reason why cases have a cooling system is because the case is the main culprit for increase of temperatures. Also if you really want a cooling system for gpus then a good lcs would be the thing to get. Plus the ram isn't garbage, how did you get that conclusion?
BurntFossil 1 day ago
that 6990 closest to the CPU looks rather hot...
SOF006 2 days ago
way too loud
angryaznman 3 days ago
@angryaznman turn down your volume...
ashdroid 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This videos are awesome! Congrat! You have an EXCELLENT JOB XD!!
omarc1to1908 3 days ago
Comment removed
omarc1to1908 3 days ago
Most of the video talks and talks about.. basically nothing. So what I could translate is: "I have this expensive bunch of stuff all put together to play a game. Here are some random numbers about how powerful it is (WAY too much for.. anything). "
But yeah, your crap is cool.
Aif9f46l 4 days ago
nice ram
jtwarwick 5 days ago
Are those running on Windows 7?
marcelo85765 5 days ago
dual dual dual... i lol'd
Xero026 5 days ago
imagine putting your finger in that fan..
Swagsta0 5 days ago
sorry but thats too noisy ... ><
ElvisAarinpresley 5 days ago
My one gpu has more fans than two of those... lol
gerbilPROJECT 5 days ago
Quad crossfire/sli? because they have 2chips? still find this SLI not Quad sli
Hypertraxable 6 days ago
@Hypertraxable Yes, two chips = SLI/CF.. which means, 4 chips = Quad..
It's not rocket science..!
Anima87 6 days ago
@Anima87 Yee, but still i find this 2way sli nothing more!. 4x 590 *if possible* would be quad in my opinion. But apparently that will be DualQuad SLI xd!
Hypertraxable 6 days ago
@Hypertraxable You may think of them as internal and external sli/cf..
It would be OCTOsli/cf
Anima87 5 days ago
@Anima87 pretty much like EVERY cpu is 1 physical cpu, but can have 8cores in dual threads witch we like to call 16-core
Hypertraxable 5 days ago
what res display is that?
joshuatk59 6 days ago
anyone else hate the way he says against?
pubertie 6 days ago
Not genuine. That sucks because now-a-days if you buy a copy of windows you can only activate it like once then it blacklists it or you have to call in which can take forever with D is for dog bullcrap. But I bet you have a paid version.
Next, ATi has had serious problems in my experience. I think GeForce cards all-around work better, especially under load and overclocking (ATi caused all the xbox red rings of death, and ps3s have nvidia, with problems being rare)
almann1117 1 week ago
@LinusTechTips your very rich can you just give me your old graphic cards?
gjjunco 1 week ago
this video was very useful for me , ty :]
iwalinski2 1 week ago
Do you need a shit load of RAM for overclocking? I don't think so, but you can never be sure....
reichstag10 1 week ago
Please do Battlefield 3 Test...I searched in youtube and there isn't a comparison between hd 6990 crossfire and gtx 590 sli ;(
hotwheels1997 1 week ago 35
And now test with 4-way sli 580 and 6970 (as 2-way sli)
FireSqy 1 week ago
Dual SLI/CF is an immense waste of money.
I wouldn 't expect anything LESS than flawless 60fps for any game at those prices
DeathWishSouthWales 1 week ago
Droolll....
lilgaything 1 week ago
AMD Win
HEROSOLDER1 1 week ago
@LinusTechTips
Gimme Ur Other Video Cards
........
Robloxblacky 1 week ago
che una pregunta XD .si haces un crossifire x3 se suma la velocidad ?
Ritmiken 1 week ago
@Ritmiken todo depende del motherboard que estes usando y del procesador ,pues las lineas de pci-e que cada procesador soporta es diferente.
magnetoazulhuevon 1 week ago
wheres your anti static wrist strap you could fry that mobo
theshadowstriker100 1 week ago
how is the amd card looses on the other tests, but woops the gtxs on Metro? What's different there?
darknessofkrish 1 week ago
@darknessofkrish In Most cases Drivers..Games with the Nvidia Branding have uneeded Code that slows down AMD cards and Games with the AMD branding has uneeded code that slows the Nvidia , Metro2033 is Raw Graphics with out any Extra added Protocalls that favor the GPU drivers, you will see this go back and forth. this current generation of games Had Nvidia branding and the Next generation will be AMD. game developers and Hardware developers switch contracts back and forth. there is no best brand
VicViperXxXxX 1 week ago
Those things are way too loud to even consider, no matter what kind of performance they offer.
derbigpr500 1 week ago
Linus, im building a gaming Pc i want a good graphic card with 2GB nvidia for £180.
was looking in to gainward gtx 560. can you recomend something for about that pricetag?
websterboyHD 1 week ago
@websterboyHD You won't get a response... Though if you ask me the AMD Radeon HD 6950 2GB is the best for a 2gb card, though you might have to go up to about £190-£200 for a 6950. If you want a 560 however, and are only using one monitor (which I highly suspect you are) I recommend you just get a 1GB 560 ti, more precisly the Asus GTX560 Direct CU-II on Amazon UK, Which only costs £166 at the moment. If you want to save even more money go for my GPU, the Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 1GB
NINJApenguinCHIMP 1 week ago
@websterboyHD get a GTX 560ti, NOT the normal 560. MSI Frozr II OC should do it.
Satadrian 1 week ago
590 is the best graphccard
RedPlanet82 1 week ago
игре метро я верю больше всего. к её созданию nvidia не прикладывала рук.
diman5567 1 week ago
Comment removed
diman5567 1 week ago
шумят одинаково. )))
diman5567 1 week ago
шумят одинаково. )))
diman5567 1 week ago
SLI = scaleable link interface... Nvidias method for connecting 2 or more video CARDS together for producing a single output..... it does however say that dual GPU cards use on board SLI hmmmmm I learned something today......thanx guys and PEACE to AL
WelLRoundeDSquarE 1 week ago
is this your job? you lucky motherbleeper
green2882 1 week ago 42
someone please explain to me how he considers 2 GPU's as "quad"? Ummmm hello, quad = 4 does it not? <:o(
WelLRoundeDSquarE 2 weeks ago
@WelLRoundeDSquarE He's using dual core GPUs.
SETHHIKARU 2 weeks ago
@SETHHIKARU NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. He's using two dualGPU graca..
TheBuilddozer 1 week ago
@WelLRoundeDSquarE Dual GPU cards you dipshit
BhunaBhuna 1 week ago
@BhunaBhuna did i call you names ? i think not..... Hmmmmm I think this needs a new term then. Isn't SLI the function of connection? so would this not be dual SLI with dual core cards? I'm just wondering.....
Oh and Bhuna......I don't need you opinion TANX <:o)
WelLRoundeDSquarE 1 week ago
FTW? of course Nvidia
basharmelessa 2 weeks ago 2
whats benchmark name ?
wietgerookt 2 weeks ago
I would choose Gtx590 just cuz its so much more silent
Blohm123 2 weeks ago
i think both cars are good :D
TheTrueM3ga 2 weeks ago
The 590 looks so sleek and sexy :D
redsucker23 2 weeks ago
lol do you even have any cases?
jakeb1997 2 weeks ago
@jakeb1997 pretty sure he does, he probably does an out-of-the-box setup for quick changes etc...
TheHeew 2 weeks ago
@jakeb1997 Yes he does, but he uses the test benches because he can build a system really quick on one of those vs in a case.
nerdyrcdriver 2 weeks ago
u write like shit
babygravy696 2 weeks ago
Say no to ACTA!
germas369 2 weeks ago
Duel GPU cards, should really only be water cooled.
seroyer2 2 weeks ago
Can someone please respon! Wat CPU cooler is Lusing here? Thank you for any replies. :)
Kvitnifr 2 weeks ago
When you used the 6990's did you use the switch to activate both GPU cores?
darkheat246 2 weeks ago
Have all that money to test the hardware yet you can't make a graph to compare the frame rates?
TheDustikus 2 weeks ago
ur voice sounds like Sheldon Cooper's voice
gabrielsntr 2 weeks ago
Holy shit hes almost yelling
Piciulous 2 weeks ago
i'd like to see an image quality comparsion, since that's the reason I've never gone back to Nvidia after trying an Ati.
ronanshepard 2 weeks ago
the clear winner is Nvdia come one just say it you know you want to
gman4141007 2 weeks ago
also evga discontinued the gtx 590's and swifttech only sells there geforce waterblocks through evga..... shame..... shame...
CuberCalebHD 2 weeks ago
why not try 4x 580 or 4x 6970/7970 ?????
maybe with some water blocks????
CuberCalebHD 2 weeks ago
how come newegg or tigerdirect dont sell the gtx 590s ????
George241312 2 weeks ago
Your windows is not genuine. haha
scalagos0123 2 weeks ago 35
@scalagos0123 Poor thing...#Daz Loader FTW
iGameAlotOnTunngle 1 week ago
@scalagos0123 It is but windows requires reactivation if you swap out components but he obviously does a lot
PaperyPaperNZ 1 week ago
@scalagos0123 he swaps components all the time that's why it says not genuine :)
bgioni 1 week ago
@scalagos0123 how can u tell?
xbackfiirez 6 days ago
LOL nice and all nice stuff untill ya see the cheep ass ram ....looks like house ram...hahaha
Zsavage1 2 weeks ago
What's the point of this? 1 is more power then any game needs at any resoultion.
Bz4r 2 weeks ago
how does the second card get any air?
wickedawesomehede 3 weeks ago 15
CROSSFIYA! YOU GET CAUGHT UP IN THA, CROSSFIYA!!!
techdecklover253 3 weeks ago 4
yourichbro?
Abaddonseven 3 weeks ago
oh this is silly using 590's with out increased vram on larger than 1080p monitor is unfair
murphy7801 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
StANDby007 3 weeks ago
can i use 1000w fractal design psu to run two of these?
ShadysFriend 3 weeks ago
@ShadysFriend give me the video card !!!
MrOpirim 2 weeks ago
@MrOpirim hahaha
ShadysFriend 2 weeks ago
what kind of case? where did you get it
TheAmd1991 3 weeks ago
gameplay > graphics
MoldytoasterMedia 3 weeks ago 74
@MoldytoasterMedia nope.avi
isorSOT 2 weeks ago
@MoldytoasterMedia graphics > gameplay
zaceezacee 2 weeks ago
@MoldytoasterMedia What a noob, so, acording to you, Doom95 is not playable ?
houari2009 2 weeks ago
@houari2009 that's the oposite of what i said.
MoldytoasterMedia 2 weeks ago
@MoldytoasterMedia So true:D But if you're insinuating that graphics is all PC gaming is good for then you are dead wrong. They also have a host of options as far as gameplay and features are concerned, that consoles do not have access to.
xxGODxOFxWAR 2 weeks ago
@MoldytoasterMedia thats why Lost Planet 2 sucks major balls.
Satadrian 1 week ago
@MoldytoasterMedia The words of a jealous boy :)
DayLight95 1 week ago
@MoldytoasterMedia graphics gameplay>
Mooseguy15 1 week ago
you sponsor him with these GPU's and he does not even have a tablet for note writing? Gees.
/ Im just kiddin, you did a great job man - Thank you! :-)
Mjarlund 3 weeks ago
i like how he doesnt use paint voor showing the benchmarks xD Old skool way ftw :D
MidnaZ 3 weeks ago
There is a difference between seeing still images as motion instead of individual frames, and that happens somewhere around 24fps and not being able to see the difference past a certain point. truth is your eyes don't have an fps they don't see the world like that so of course you can tell the difference. but keep in mind, 60fps will look much smoother then 100fps if you only have a 60hz monitor
ChickenWln 3 weeks ago
Dear everybody below me in the comments,
The average human eye surpasses 100fps, in which it sees, and it can detect a difference between say 20 to 50 fps or 50 to 100. It's just that it gets harder to notice as the frame rate of the becomes more alike to the frames per second of which you see.
1pnoe 3 weeks ago
Anything above 60 you can't see if your monitor's refresh rate is 60 ghz. Why is everyone crying?
mozart116 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Znyggisen 3 weeks ago
has expensive ass hardware, HDD instead of SSD. And leaves out ram timings and command rates. lol wut?
asillynoob 3 weeks ago
one milion of words to say:
AMD is SUCKS > BIS 999,998 tiemes.
GrulbGL 3 weeks ago
Linus something is wrong with the Crysis 2 i have EAH 6950 and when on ULTIMATE i get static 100fps...
Astro247z 4 weeks ago
SLI is 2 cards so if you want quad SLI then you need 8 GPUs
keepsyougoing1 4 weeks ago
@keepsyougoing1 *quad* is = to 4 so 4 gpus ( but we all know that )
but i get what you mean :P 8 gpus would be SICK!
ive never really though about it till now xD lol so it'd be only dual crossfire lol
ionizdgrunt2 3 weeks ago
What CPU cooler might that be? Thanks for any reply :)
Kvitnifr 4 weeks ago
@Kvitnifr its a noctua but i don't know what model is.
area51kill 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear friend, can you help me please to unlock my nokia n8 with Cuda tech.,thank you in advance!!
user69003 4 weeks ago
try a quad m2090
randomishxd 4 weeks ago
so ok i cant understand this: i have a sapphire hd 6950 and on crysis 2 on ultra i get 90 fps whereas here he gets 44.2 fps with 2 6990's o_O wtf? and i do have an older sony display where i run them at 1200x1024 (or something like that) but does that really change the fps THAT much?! o_O
littlebuch 4 weeks ago
@littlebuch Lol... obviously. Your card is overkill for that low resolution. If you got a better screen your frames would drop dramatically.
TheHornyHomunculus 4 weeks ago
@TheHornyHomunculus yeah but res doesnt really do much in the fps department... :\
littlebuch 4 weeks ago
@littlebuch Yes it does. If you don't think so, play in 800x600 then play in 1080p...
Kirbyguy222 4 weeks ago
@Kirbyguy222 try 640x480 it sucks running game's that low these days.
jr540123 4 weeks ago
@littlebuch Of course it does, it makes the biggest difference O_o
grimy89098 4 weeks ago
But, will it blend?
iiLtnGeneralzZ 1 month ago
Yeah but can it run tetris?
TMVIJV 1 month ago
That is far too loud.
AntBelch 1 month ago
so i guess quad gtx 590 OR ATI 6990 is not enough for this guy... he needs both...
insertacoolname 1 month ago
You could play some serious pokemon with that thing.
SoulsTaker666OnFire 1 month ago
The real test like this need to be done with Nvidia Surround VS AMD Eyefinity.
PAWMANIACS 1 month ago
I did the same thing on my ASUS board, the 16x slots are further apart on the rampage iv, which normally would be a good thing, unfortunately, that puts the bottom gpu (gtx 580) directly over one of the motherboard fans. Not a real big deal, it has about 1/4 of fan still exposed.
AvatarOfAvatar 1 month ago
look son a vorgin.
goncaloleiro 1 month ago
@goncaloleiro He is married.
sharinganZuko 1 month ago
@goncaloleiro Virgin*
bobmclightning 1 month ago
VIRGINITY, I CHOOSE YOU!
goncaloleiro 1 month ago
i got a question... why does comparing fps for graphics cards matter when people cant see over 30fps?
xadam123 1 month ago
@xadam123 That's a myth. You can clearly see a difference between 30 fps 60fps and 100fps.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 month ago 30
@zomgwtfbbqbagel The actuality behind it is that you can't see over 30fps, HOWEVER the blur is greatly reduced at grater fps. The other side of it is that the human eye is not a machine and can't be synced with the display. Therefore higher fps increases the likelihood that you will see a sold frame. The more fps, the less time any one frame takes to be displayed.
PAWMANIACS 1 month ago
@PAWMANIACS I can distinctly tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps. But okay.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 month ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel @TheLarhf I never said said that you can't tell the difference. Try Reading all of what a person says next time. Its a lot more complicated than JUST fps; I personally look at it from a physics point of view. The term fps confuses the issue, I always like to refer to it as hertz as it makes it fit into physics better for me. I would go into very detailed specifics but I know the audience here doesn't really care.
PAWMANIACS 1 month ago
@PAWMANIACS I agree. Hertz matters more once you have a good 60fps.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 month ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel As future electrician, in theory we have thought that lightbulb flashes 50 times per second (due Finland's 50Hz electricity network, in USA they have 60Hz so 60 times per second flashes), so if you could actually see 60 frames per second, you would see flashing lights and stuff like that.
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy I'm pretty sure you'd see a difference. One light would be smoother looking than the other.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Nope. I just said that eyes are slower tha 50 flashes per second.
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy i know for a fact my eyes can see upwards of 60 fps, but on top of that, i can feel much smoother the game runs even if i cant see it, i can feel the difference between 150 and 300 fps in cod. The mouse and movemetns and everyhting just happens so much smoother and easier.
klooger28 3 weeks ago
@klooger28 Prove it. You see flashing lights? No. Then your eyes can't see upwards of 60 fps. And cause we are all humans and have very close skills, it impossible. And no screen is over 120Hz (or at least 200Hz). So it doesn't even refreshes the screen 300 times per second. So stop trolling.
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy you obviously have no idea what your talking about. My screen is only 60hz so yes i am only seeing 60 fps, but the gameplay itself happening behind the screen is far smoother, im not using my eyes to detect the difference above 150 fps, but it is definately there
klooger28 3 weeks ago
@klooger28 Yes the game is smoother with bigger fps, I know that too, but you just stated that your eyes could see upwards of 60fps.
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy they can, but they arent because my monitor is only 60hz :)
klooger28 3 weeks ago
@klooger28 And if they actually could, you would see your screen flashing, you would see lights flashing and stuff like that
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy i wouldnt specifically see it flashing, but its not perfectly smooth
klooger28 3 weeks ago
@FireSqy
there are even 400 Hz LED TVs out there
progste 3 weeks ago
@progste Sounds pretty useless for TV ;D but thanks for info, didn't knew.
FireSqy 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheLarhf 1 month ago
@PAWMANIACS boallen dot com / fps-compare dot html
TheLarhf 1 month ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel shut up cock head lol i dont relly mean that
MinecraftKid50 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel between 30 and 60 yes, but your eyes cant tell the difference from anything higher than 50-60
ShaunJ4Y1873 3 weeks ago
@ShaunJ4Y1873 Uh yes they can...get a monitor with a higher refresh rate, it is noticeable
xxSymbiotexx 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Let him be, those myths are the only thing console "gamers" have for defending their under powered toys...
CircuitDaemon 3 weeks ago 50
Comment removed
isorSOT 2 weeks ago
@CircuitDaemon dude, shut up
isorSOT 2 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel
30fps to 60 fps: YES
60fps to 100fps: NO
xPangerLenisx 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel On a normal LCD/LED monitor you CANNOT physically see 100fps because the refresh rate on the monitor prevents more than 60fps from appearing on the screen.
GotenSSJ1 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Every person sees it differently. Some can't even tell the difference between 20 and 30
sassviiret 3 weeks ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Human eye can't see over 60 fps :\
Dirxano 3 weeks ago
@Dirxano That's not true at all. First off the more light there is the higher FPS your eye can "see" if it's dark you "see" less FPS. The human eye can detect well over 200 FPS provided there is ample light. So please stop spreading misinformation.
annythepip 2 weeks ago
does quad not stand for 4? maybe its my ignorance but i thought quadfire was 4 GPUs where as you were only running dual.
desiGnampthia 1 month ago
@desiGnampthia The Nvidia 590 and the AMD 6990 are the top models of the generations, and are "dual-core" GPUs. Todays computers can't handle more than 4 GPU cores, so this is max possible.
madsmadser 1 month ago
@madsmadser ah i see... sorry, hehe
desiGnampthia 4 weeks ago