The case on abortion is simple. If you believe that a fetus at some point is the same as a child who has born abortion is murder, just as killing a 2 - day old child is murder. It doesn't matter if the child is raped or not. If you don't believe the fetus is a human life at a point, then it is simply part of the womens body, like a bacteria and is her right to kill.
Supposedly before 24 weeks the baby has no chance of survival, so I'd say before that
It is unclear whether the fetus part of the women's body or an individual yet. However, I consider the after 24 weeks abortion is always wrong and should always be illegal. it doesn't mater whether the women was raped, or the child is diseased or anything.
Anyone who is calling themselves a maverick should not be in office. A maverick is someone who stands alone, is independent, who doesn't agree with others or work with others. It's their way or the highway. This is a dangerous person to be running the country.
We had a reckless maverick in George Bush look where that got us. But worst yet look at Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, Muammar Al-Gaddafi, Kim Jung-il, and Omar al-Bashir just to name a few, all mavericks. We don't want a maverick America.
Men have no say in the matter? Clean out your ears women, and listen to this man speak. Most people contemplating murder don't do it because they will go to jail if caught. Why killing your own children should not be punishable by jail time is beyond me. If a woman kills her child 2 hours after giving birth, she is subject to THE DEATH SENTENCE in some states! But if she had only decided to kill it 3 hours prior the only difference is that it's legal and you didn't have to look it in the eyes!
The choice is simple: either the woman decides, or the government decides. Why are all these so-called conservatives ready to hand people's private choices over to government? Why do they agree with bin Laden in this matter?
You know, "Hitler urged people to drink milk. Hitler was evil! Therefore drinking milk must be evil!" And Marx supported logical thinking! anyway...Why are we so called "conservatives" ready to hand this "private choice" over to government? That's like asking why the people ever wanted a government to make murder illegal. Why not give the choice back to the people? Both involve one deciding to take the life of another without regard for their "private choice". That is why both should be illegal.
Why does it have to be democrat or republican? OMFG! Vote for the person not the party. People that vote for anything other than what they will do as a president to protect our national security, economy, and civil liberties is a fool and is unpatriotic. Long live Ron Paul and his message! Long live the Constitution, and with it our Freedom!
For those of you who insist "men shouldn't be allowed in the debate"; you do realize it was seven MEN in black robes who made abortion on demand the law of the land in 1973, right? And that nearly all abortionists are men? You sure don't mind men being involved in the abortion debate when it's to your advantage. Compare that to the RTL community, who welcomes everyone who is with us in protecting the rights of the unborn. We don't think anyone should be excluded from the debate.
Yes, it is true. It all sits in the hands of men. And if McCain is elected, men will decide when we get pregnant, when we bear children, and it will be more oppression of the female population. HOWEVER, you certainly must realize that more unwanted pregnancies means more unwanted children and more welfare recipients...Oh, but I am sure you don't want to help provide for these children once they are here. Right?
Of course they don't want to help provide for them once they are here. They tell us this all the time by not raising min. wage, by not cutting taxes for the middle class and lower income, by not putting money into our public school system, by not fixing the terrible health care system. Also by opposing sex-ed and supporting asbstinence only programs. This is a cyclical problem. There is no black and white right answer, the answer lives in the grey areas.
luvlife and loathe the only presidential candidate standing up for it? Or do you just love your own and are not concerned for others? Then you should change your name to luvself
If there is any woman reading this who is thinking about having an abortion, I encourage you to look up the 4D abortion video on youtube. "Love your neighbor as you love yourself." That includes your child. There is always addoption and that is true even for babies who might be sick or disabled. Don't listen to anyone who says that God hates you. That is a lie. He loves all his children and never leaves then alone, he is always patiently waiting for them to call for him.
I AM against aborion and PRO LIFE. That means that I believe that the dignity of human life goes from the womb to the tomb. I do care about babies in utero and babies that have been born, children, teens, adults, and seniors. I also care about the troops in Iraq. My brother recently finnished his second tour there in three years, but unlike the unborn, he chose to be in that sittuation.
I understand why some think that freedom of speech and opinion shouldn't be limited by genger, but pregnancy is something that only woman can experiance. Men should not be the ones who determine what a woman can do with her own body. That would be like women trying to outlaw, or I don't know, male enhancement surgery or something.
Roe V Wade was decided on the 14th amendment, that which is based on issues of privacy.
Making abortion illegal has degraded the 14th amendment the rights of privacy that a woman has or had.
The situation is simple, say on the other foot, The President and congress state that viagra should be illegal that 'god' says the man ought not be unnatural and then a federal ban on viagra comes up; what will the results show?
That it is unconstitutional? Though it is no different.
How about this position on Abortion? Prior to viability you can have an Abortion for any reason. But, after viability you can end the pregnency, but you can't Abort. You have have a C-Section or induced early birth, than the Fetus is put on life support and doctors try to do all they can to keep it alive. Killing should only be done when necessary.
God says not to lie, eat too much or be lazy...are those the next things you are going to work on outlawing? A woman's choice is between her and her God, not you and yours.
Republicans used to be "hands off" in the area of government intrusion in personal freedoms. The whole anti abortion stance is decidedly UN-republican. As a nation, we are far more willing to blindly defend the rights of a mass of cells than we are to provide for pregnant women, or children once they are born. It is the height of hypocrisy. How has McCain voted on children's issues once they are here? That is a far better test of whether he is pro-life or not!
If you're waiting for a perfect world to have a child in or to live in then you should just kill yourself now. Those of us that were born at least have a fighting chance and an opportunity to change the world we live in.
I understand your view and I realize that women do all of the work and suffer all of the pain and risk in a pregnancy. However, I beleive in cases of non-life threatning or non-incestious/rape pregnancies the man should have at least some say. After all, the fetus is composed of 1/2 the males genes. Speaking from a strictly Darwinian perspective, this is significant. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, but I just wanted to state my opinion in an open forum.
You've made an interesting point. I wonder what the statistics show in cases where a woman is supported in her pregnancy by the father of the baby. Anyone have an idea if those kinds of data are collected? I know they ask those questions to women seeking termination, but do they do anything with them?
Let's see, a candidate for president, and he doesn't have the right to take a position on Roe v Wade? Cleary this woman has disqualified herself as anyone capable of putting two thoughts together. But she is not alone. Others think this way, and they say men in general have no right to express an opinion against abortion. Seems free speech is limited by gender. Didn't know that. Must be because of the shame someone feels when they take a life.
it becomes more than simply having an opinion when you are a politician who will actively campaign and take steps to prevent women from obtaining abortions through your actions.
Man have no say in the matter?
The case on abortion is simple. If you believe that a fetus at some point is the same as a child who has born abortion is murder, just as killing a 2 - day old child is murder. It doesn't matter if the child is raped or not. If you don't believe the fetus is a human life at a point, then it is simply part of the womens body, like a bacteria and is her right to kill.
Supposedly before 24 weeks the baby has no chance of survival, so I'd say before that
pogoman555 2 years ago
It is unclear whether the fetus part of the women's body or an individual yet. However, I consider the after 24 weeks abortion is always wrong and should always be illegal. it doesn't mater whether the women was raped, or the child is diseased or anything.
pogoman555 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone who is calling themselves a maverick should not be in office. A maverick is someone who stands alone, is independent, who doesn't agree with others or work with others. It's their way or the highway. This is a dangerous person to be running the country.
We had a reckless maverick in George Bush look where that got us. But worst yet look at Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, Muammar Al-Gaddafi, Kim Jung-il, and Omar al-Bashir just to name a few, all mavericks. We don't want a maverick America.
trktrt 3 years ago
Comment removed
biblefarce 3 years ago
Men have no say in the matter? Clean out your ears women, and listen to this man speak. Most people contemplating murder don't do it because they will go to jail if caught. Why killing your own children should not be punishable by jail time is beyond me. If a woman kills her child 2 hours after giving birth, she is subject to THE DEATH SENTENCE in some states! But if she had only decided to kill it 3 hours prior the only difference is that it's legal and you didn't have to look it in the eyes!
niwdah 3 years ago
The choice is simple: either the woman decides, or the government decides. Why are all these so-called conservatives ready to hand people's private choices over to government? Why do they agree with bin Laden in this matter?
jigen08 3 years ago
You know, "Hitler urged people to drink milk. Hitler was evil! Therefore drinking milk must be evil!" And Marx supported logical thinking! anyway...Why are we so called "conservatives" ready to hand this "private choice" over to government? That's like asking why the people ever wanted a government to make murder illegal. Why not give the choice back to the people? Both involve one deciding to take the life of another without regard for their "private choice". That is why both should be illegal.
niwdah 3 years ago
yes i know abortion is such a difficult issue
kmcl11 2 years ago
Why does it have to be democrat or republican? OMFG! Vote for the person not the party. People that vote for anything other than what they will do as a president to protect our national security, economy, and civil liberties is a fool and is unpatriotic. Long live Ron Paul and his message! Long live the Constitution, and with it our Freedom!
drunkenboxer1985 3 years ago
For those of you who insist "men shouldn't be allowed in the debate"; you do realize it was seven MEN in black robes who made abortion on demand the law of the land in 1973, right? And that nearly all abortionists are men? You sure don't mind men being involved in the abortion debate when it's to your advantage. Compare that to the RTL community, who welcomes everyone who is with us in protecting the rights of the unborn. We don't think anyone should be excluded from the debate.
acb06172005 3 years ago
Yes, it is true. It all sits in the hands of men. And if McCain is elected, men will decide when we get pregnant, when we bear children, and it will be more oppression of the female population. HOWEVER, you certainly must realize that more unwanted pregnancies means more unwanted children and more welfare recipients...Oh, but I am sure you don't want to help provide for these children once they are here. Right?
nykita29 3 years ago
Of course they don't want to help provide for them once they are here. They tell us this all the time by not raising min. wage, by not cutting taxes for the middle class and lower income, by not putting money into our public school system, by not fixing the terrible health care system. Also by opposing sex-ed and supporting asbstinence only programs. This is a cyclical problem. There is no black and white right answer, the answer lives in the grey areas.
girlfighter98 3 years ago
I LOATHE THIS MAN!
luvlife347 3 years ago 2
luvlife and loathe the only presidential candidate standing up for it? Or do you just love your own and are not concerned for others? Then you should change your name to luvself
hwinston 3 years ago
If there is any woman reading this who is thinking about having an abortion, I encourage you to look up the 4D abortion video on youtube. "Love your neighbor as you love yourself." That includes your child. There is always addoption and that is true even for babies who might be sick or disabled. Don't listen to anyone who says that God hates you. That is a lie. He loves all his children and never leaves then alone, he is always patiently waiting for them to call for him.
oriana251 3 years ago
I AM against aborion and PRO LIFE. That means that I believe that the dignity of human life goes from the womb to the tomb. I do care about babies in utero and babies that have been born, children, teens, adults, and seniors. I also care about the troops in Iraq. My brother recently finnished his second tour there in three years, but unlike the unborn, he chose to be in that sittuation.
oriana251 3 years ago
I understand why some think that freedom of speech and opinion shouldn't be limited by genger, but pregnancy is something that only woman can experiance. Men should not be the ones who determine what a woman can do with her own body. That would be like women trying to outlaw, or I don't know, male enhancement surgery or something.
symphonia8512 3 years ago 3
Sloooow down Diane. I can't understand you when you talk that fast!
HappyKmore 3 years ago
Roe V Wade was decided on the 14th amendment, that which is based on issues of privacy.
Making abortion illegal has degraded the 14th amendment the rights of privacy that a woman has or had.
The situation is simple, say on the other foot, The President and congress state that viagra should be illegal that 'god' says the man ought not be unnatural and then a federal ban on viagra comes up; what will the results show?
That it is unconstitutional? Though it is no different.
safedawn 3 years ago
How about this position on Abortion? Prior to viability you can have an Abortion for any reason. But, after viability you can end the pregnency, but you can't Abort. You have have a C-Section or induced early birth, than the Fetus is put on life support and doctors try to do all they can to keep it alive. Killing should only be done when necessary.
FoxmanPhD 3 years ago
God said not to abort. That is enough for me!
itsme221 3 years ago
God says not to lie, eat too much or be lazy...are those the next things you are going to work on outlawing? A woman's choice is between her and her God, not you and yours.
nykita29 3 years ago 2
Republicans used to be "hands off" in the area of government intrusion in personal freedoms. The whole anti abortion stance is decidedly UN-republican. As a nation, we are far more willing to blindly defend the rights of a mass of cells than we are to provide for pregnant women, or children once they are born. It is the height of hypocrisy. How has McCain voted on children's issues once they are here? That is a far better test of whether he is pro-life or not!
northerngarden53 3 years ago 7
If you're waiting for a perfect world to have a child in or to live in then you should just kill yourself now. Those of us that were born at least have a fighting chance and an opportunity to change the world we live in.
hwinston 3 years ago
We men can't get pregnant, so we should have no say. End of that.
McCain is the sexist. And so is every other anti-abortion person.
mjbyars 4 years ago 3
I understand your view and I realize that women do all of the work and suffer all of the pain and risk in a pregnancy. However, I beleive in cases of non-life threatning or non-incestious/rape pregnancies the man should have at least some say. After all, the fetus is composed of 1/2 the males genes. Speaking from a strictly Darwinian perspective, this is significant. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, but I just wanted to state my opinion in an open forum.
-And yes I am a man.
rjdemont 3 years ago
You've made an interesting point. I wonder what the statistics show in cases where a woman is supported in her pregnancy by the father of the baby. Anyone have an idea if those kinds of data are collected? I know they ask those questions to women seeking termination, but do they do anything with them?
nykita29 3 years ago
Let's see, a candidate for president, and he doesn't have the right to take a position on Roe v Wade? Cleary this woman has disqualified herself as anyone capable of putting two thoughts together. But she is not alone. Others think this way, and they say men in general have no right to express an opinion against abortion. Seems free speech is limited by gender. Didn't know that. Must be because of the shame someone feels when they take a life.
dslewis333 4 years ago
what a bunch of sexist crap.
everyone is entitled to an opinion. everyone. so if you don't like their opinion then you disagree. fair enough.
but to argue that mccain is not allowed to have an opinion b/c of his gender is elitist propoganda.
simply say, you disagree and vote for someone else. it's that simple.
benande 4 years ago 2
it becomes more than simply having an opinion when you are a politician who will actively campaign and take steps to prevent women from obtaining abortions through your actions.
xvjynx 3 years ago 2