here we go again with the youtube poker pros! WELL i think it was an ok fold, if your in lindgreens situation hes thinkin i got A 6.. phil ivey might have A J OR A K anything beterr than 6, online poker, and casino poker is different than these kind of poker tournaments.
I read a book called SECRET ADVANTAGES OF A POKER PRO and it was about the things you do when you play professionally! its a great book and not doesn't take a week to read! you can download it on amazon and barnes n noble
Lindgren called the turn and he already knew ivey would bet the river after a check, the 4 of diamonds didnt change anything, why lindgren chagged his mind?
It is, however, difficult to get away with a bluff when you represent the hand that your opponent is holding. Anyway i just got free 50 $ from Pokerfrik website so im gonna try to build my fortune as well!
Patrik had also a great WSOP, even though he didn't play himself that many tournaments. But his start is interesting, he started with only 50 $ online, and hegot it free from PokerFrik website :)
This challenge will obviously be a lot different from the one against Patrik Antonius. Antonius started his carrer with taking free 50 $ starting capital from Pokerfrik websie :)
Cole South ended the weekend on a positive note when he took off with $171K of his opponents money yesterday. Cole also started his carrier with free 50 $ starting capital from PokerFrik site
I was up til 4am last night playing webcam poker on pokerview. Forget these fake bot sites you guys gotta see this shit man it’s the perfect online poker man.
There are many hands in theAshman103’s range that he will have to fold to Antonius’ shove, but obviously the hand theAshman103 had here was not among those. It's funny that Ashman built his fortune with free 50 $ starting capital he got from PokerFrik website.
It should be said that this was not a heads up match, but durrrr’s loss was almost equal to that of URnotINdanger2’s win. I can't believe i really got 50 $ free without deposit from Pokerfrik???
All his bets are understandable and cannot easily be criticized. Anyway he built his roll out of the free 50 $ deposit he got from PokerFrik website lol.
Rofl you call this BLUFF?! I had 2-7 last night, playing $500/$1000NL with Johnny Chan, Mike Matusow, Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey, Phil Hellmuth and Patrick Antonius. Johnny raises to 3k, Negreanu re raises to $10k. I pause for a second and say in a cool calm voice 'I raise to $35k.' Johnny folds and Negreanu calls. Flop AK3. Daniel bets $52k. I pushed for $258k total. Negreanu thinks about it and folds. He shows Pocket Kings and says 'I guess you had the trip aces'.
@soal09 yup. i dont think ivey puts him on a 10... no way. he knows he either checkraised empty or had a weak ace. and with his behaviour at that turn, which puts 89 straight in there, KQ, AJ etc ivey knows exactly where's he's at. this is so ***** good pokerthinking. love it
Phil Gordon is a wuss .. He say's "very intimidating for Cheryl. If I was her with 3 people left and get to say I played against those 2 guys I would not be intimidated because obviously I have nothing to loose and a huge opportunity to gain.
@Sycorexxx Are you kidding me? Not more then bluffcatcher? You are just one another book player, very carefull player, I see, but againts top players can be good second pair easilly. In heads up is top pair strong hand againts agressive players. Only problem is, that Ivey played hs hand well and Lindgren couldnt be sure by his ace.
I think, yes, it is possibility. Sometimes you bluffing like you value betting, it is best way. And how I said, he played that very well. It seems pretty strong call re raise on flop, bet turn and river :o) Just nice hand. I dont know, how Ivey play there. Many times your decision depend on reading people moves. I would probablly fold A on turn :o)))) But I am I, my poker game is different, then pros game :o) So I dont know. Still, I thing, 80 000 was good bet on river to 140 000
ivey usually bet very qick when he is bluffing look the bet on the turn ....and when he got a real hand he take a large time to think, that's true lol.
well if lindgren is gonna take control of the pot by raising but then checkin on the next street, whats the point in raisin on the flop if ur not gonna follow through on the turn
If you're playing three handed and you hit an ace you push that shit and if your opponent has you beat, you go home. Eric way over thought that one.because he was playing Ivey. I've seen him do that before, get a little chick-chick-chicken.
This comment of mine was positive man, i wanted to say that despite they lose money to each other, they remain good friends . Why did you call me dumb cunt.... asshole
2) erics biggest mistake of the hand: checking the big blind. FFS, we are 3 handed, and Phil limps the sb. Give me a break. Yes I realize Edog is a mega nit, but, he needs to raise his blind, period!
3)when Phil calls the raise on the flop, 89 seems very likely.
Bet the draw, get check raised, then call, then lead out on the turn. As the commentator says on the river, there are a TON of hands which Edog beats, and this is so very true
@jibbers0 THis was wierd tbh, wasnt phil in the smal blind? he should be out of postion then :S? cus sheryl folded the button then phil should be out of position , shouldnt he?
the man is billiant just his face u carnt read it thats wat makes a great poker player .if u havnt seen it type in phil ivey bluff vsbluff a million times better than this u wont beleve it
What was he expecting that Ivey would check on the river after a bet on the turn?
He knew that bet on the river was comming and still he called the turn. Was he hoping to get tow pairs or 3 of a kind on the river. Damn noobish. I don't know why this guy is pro. No vids I've seen about him are impressive at all.
because he was playing phil ivey, the best of all time. tough to play perfect against that kind of competition, would you play perfectly staring at phil ivey?
Mandoria, you have no idea what you are talking about. Ace rag in that position against Ivy at that point of the game...a lay down is perfectly understandable. Lindgren is one of the best players in the world, while you are simply a bystander, posting kneejerk anonymous insults with no thought or reason behind them.
L.O.L. like the title again it's bluffing. and if ivey finds out that ur a tight player like u pretty much already told everyone. he's just gonna bust you when he gets the nuts.
The key element here is stack sizes of Ivey (almost 400k) and Lindgren (260k). Before the turn Lindgren knew he had better hand, so he raised, but when J showed on turn, he realised that if Ivey had 98 or KQ (both very probable) he had no chance. So he only call Ivey's turn bet, because if he reraised, ivey would try to go all-in to bluff him out or get all his chips (and lindgren with A + small kicker couldnt afford to call that raise).
So he decided to call to keep pot small and see what ivey would do on the river. Ivey fired 3rd bullet. At this moment, lindgren still thought that his hand is PROBABLY better than ivey's, but he COULDN'T RISK another 80k with Ace with weak kicker! Why? If he called ivey's bet and lost, he would lose 8k (pf)+25k(flop)+40k(turn)+80k(river) = 157k in this hand and be left with only 260k - 157k = 103k.
Ivey would be out of reach for him, and he could even lose 3rd place to Hines! Instead, he lost only 70k, and remained his 2nd place with somewhat nice stack
i watched the hand blind, i thought Erick had sumthn like Q10 as well, Funny how theyre both lieing at the end, "probly a good lay down", "what u have" "a draw". lol.
some people are really stupid.. They say that its an obvious bet on the river by ivey that he was bluffing.. but when ivey got a winning hand against allen cunningham and he only bet 35000 they also said its obvious that ivey had a good hand. Dont say anything as if you are like them you stupid dumbass!
there's one wrong thing in this game, how the heck is ivey both on the button and small blind at the same time? it's not heads-up, it's 3-handed, he should act as first pre-flop and last post-flop :S
i think the dealer made some mistakes and anybody at the table noticed that!:D
If he put Ivey on 8,9 then why did he call him on the turn, he would of had no outs. At the end of the day I think he really had no clue on what Phil might of had leaving him to decide if his one pair was strong enough.
you question my logic by asking me a stupid question.You said he put Ivey on ace 7 (2 pair)so why did he call a bet on the turn?.He would have never played A7 like that or A9 so at the end of the day I think your half a donkey! and I would tell you why he put him on 8,9 or 10,9 of clubs but I would be teaching you too much about poker.
LMAO. You're really not that bright are you. I can guarentee you he knew Ivey didn't hit a straight, 10,9 clubs what the fuck? He would of gone all in if that was the case. He didn't trust his kicker against Ivey's bet so fuck off.
how can you put him on Ace 9? A9 would never bet that river! and why did you say A7?if he had Ace7 lindgren would have folded on the turn with no out(thats by your logic) tell me how you came to that conclusion? the way the hand was played 8,9 is the most likely hand.Just wait until other people reply to this comment and you will see...it is possible that ivey had A7 but probably not.
It's really quite simple, A9 would of out kicked him would it not? If Eric had of hit a 6 on the river, he very well would of chanced his luck that Ivey had the 9 not the 7. If an A hit on the river then Eric would of most likely ruled Ivey off the A and raised. Neither hit so he wasn't prepared to gamble. It could be the only possible logic Eric could of used to bet the way he did. I welcome other peoples opinions myself.
he knows what iveys capable of on the button which is why he called the turn. however, he knew he was going to be unprepared for a river bet, so his turn call is questionable. if he was going to call the turn he might as well raise or fold.
My point exactly, he wanted to hit again on the river which means he must not of placed Ivey on a straight on the turn, and he would of known the river wouldn't of helped a straight draw. So why didn't he call with top pair on the river, and no flush draws? Cause he thought Iveys top pair was better than his top pair.
Think whatever you like Pal, so apparantly he knew Ivey had a straight but just thought he would donate him some extra chips on 4th street, yep ok. I challenge you to a poker match and we will see just how good you really are (not)
so when are we playing pal? and you put ivey on ace9 or ace 7 so why would he donate to him on fourth street idiot! does a6 have outs against a7? NO! and calling with 3 outs is a stupid play anyway so get the fuck out of here fish!
Very strange hand, and you would expect Phil would've raise KQ heads up preflop. Phil was thinking a few levels above Lindgren here I suppose. Maybe Lindgren put Ivey on a very tricky play with AA?
If Lindgren is putting him on a particular hand, its obviously 89. Limping in, betting the draw, calling the raise because its open ended and then betting when he hits the jack. I think Ivey would be 3 betting AA/T7 on the flop, so you can't really put him on either of those hands. JT would also make a lot of sense because Lindgren did not look like he had an ace or straight, giving Ivey essentially the nut two pair. I'd think he'd almost definitely be folding J7 to the flop check raise.
Comment removed
VicenzoV 6 months ago
Phil Ivey = :-D
crunk4124 6 months ago
here we go again with the youtube poker pros! WELL i think it was an ok fold, if your in lindgreens situation hes thinkin i got A 6.. phil ivey might have A J OR A K anything beterr than 6, online poker, and casino poker is different than these kind of poker tournaments.
datu0108 6 months ago
ATTENTION!!
Want to learn WHAT it takes to be a professional poker player/ win at poker? Learn from the pro's of the mid stakes!
Visit our channel RigTheRake, just click the name, and you are on your way to be successfull at this magnificent game!
So Click the name
/RigTheRake
RigTheRake 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I read a book called SECRET ADVANTAGES OF A POKER PRO and it was about the things you do when you play professionally! its a great book and not doesn't take a week to read! you can download it on amazon and barnes n noble
SuperOldwiseman 7 months ago
3:48 nice boobs in the background :D
gottaPushIt 8 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
OVER $1000 OF FREEROLLS A DAY ON HIGH PULSE POKER
JOIN TODAY USING CODE POKERCHIPS
~~~ NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED~~~
champions20000009 8 months ago
Lindgren called the turn and he already knew ivey would bet the river after a check, the 4 of diamonds didnt change anything, why lindgren chagged his mind?
futuroleghista 8 months ago
US players are able to play real poker on pokerview
johnsmith7490 8 months ago
Lingrens only bad move was reraising the flop. He could of just called down to the river and played this top pair as a bluff catcher.
MrPavDotCom 8 months ago
Non_USA_players_sign_up_at_Full_Tilt_Poker_with_referral-code:FTUS600_and_you_will_get_a_600$_signing_bonus
adamstamina 8 months ago
Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_players_for_real_money_deposits_and_when_you_sign_up_with_Referral_Code:FTUS600-you_get_a_600$_bonus
jordankimberly22 9 months ago
Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_players_for_real_money_deposits_and_when_you_sign_up_with_Referral_Code:FTUS600-you_get_a_600$_bonus
59elizabethdavenport 9 months ago
hehê_î_sìgñed_ùp_ãt_fûll_tilt_pôkèr
_úsîng_referrãl_codë:_YOU600_âñd_gõt_â_600_Ðòllar_boñüs
isabellebird40 10 months ago
Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_players_for_real-money_deposits_and_when_you_sign_up_with_Referral_Code:FTUS600_you_get_a_600$_bonus
courtneywilson52 10 months ago
Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at_account_sign-up_with_Full_Tilt_Poker_gets_you_a_600$_bonus
rockyroggow 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Phil Galfold said he got his first free bankroll from Pokerfrik website.
jibraanoo 10 months ago
When_creating_a_new_account_at_Full_Tilt_Poker_use_the_Referral_Code:FTUS600_for_a_600$_sign-up_bonus
evonyshelly2156 10 months ago
Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at_account_sign_up_with_Full_Tilt_Poker_gets_you-a_600$_bonus
donnabarrow29 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A 600 dollar signing bonus just for using the Referral Code: FTUS600 when you make a new account with Full Tilt Poker. wow
baldon3692 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is, however, difficult to get away with a bluff when you represent the hand that your opponent is holding. Anyway i just got free 50 $ from Pokerfrik website so im gonna try to build my fortune as well!
swatisingh1008 10 months ago
phil gordon is an idiot.
KsideNapa2010 10 months ago
Lindgren is never impressive.
lg123xyz 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Patrik had also a great WSOP, even though he didn't play himself that many tournaments. But his start is interesting, he started with only 50 $ online, and hegot it free from PokerFrik website :)
jibraanoo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This challenge will obviously be a lot different from the one against Patrik Antonius. Antonius started his carrer with taking free 50 $ starting capital from Pokerfrik websie :)
babyelena85 10 months ago
Phil Galfold said he got his first free bankroll from Pokerfrik website.
babyelena85 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cole South ended the weekend on a positive note when he took off with $171K of his opponents money yesterday. Cole also started his carrier with free 50 $ starting capital from PokerFrik site
20116423 11 months ago
I was up til 4am last night playing webcam poker on pokerview. Forget these fake bot sites you guys gotta see this shit man it’s the perfect online poker man.
johnsmith7490 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are many hands in theAshman103’s range that he will have to fold to Antonius’ shove, but obviously the hand theAshman103 had here was not among those. It's funny that Ashman built his fortune with free 50 $ starting capital he got from PokerFrik website.
20116423 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It should be said that this was not a heads up match, but durrrr’s loss was almost equal to that of URnotINdanger2’s win. I can't believe i really got 50 $ free without deposit from Pokerfrik???
ruet06 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All his bets are understandable and cannot easily be criticized. Anyway he built his roll out of the free 50 $ deposit he got from PokerFrik website lol.
albertjosse1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rofl you call this BLUFF?! I had 2-7 last night, playing $500/$1000NL with Johnny Chan, Mike Matusow, Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey, Phil Hellmuth and Patrick Antonius. Johnny raises to 3k, Negreanu re raises to $10k. I pause for a second and say in a cool calm voice 'I raise to $35k.' Johnny folds and Negreanu calls. Flop AK3. Daniel bets $52k. I pushed for $258k total. Negreanu thinks about it and folds. He shows Pocket Kings and says 'I guess you had the trip aces'.
Denmarkianboyy 1 year ago
@Denmarkianboyy i bet u built ur bank roll from the $50 dollars u got from pokerficks, everyone else seems to have.
2willyboy 9 months ago
@soal09 yup. i dont think ivey puts him on a 10... no way. he knows he either checkraised empty or had a weak ace. and with his behaviour at that turn, which puts 89 straight in there, KQ, AJ etc ivey knows exactly where's he's at. this is so ***** good pokerthinking. love it
aloefgren 1 year ago
Phil Gordon is a wuss .. He say's "very intimidating for Cheryl. If I was her with 3 people left and get to say I played against those 2 guys I would not be intimidated because obviously I have nothing to loose and a huge opportunity to gain.
Bladerunner55217 1 year ago
"There are a lot of hands that Erik can beat" UHM NOT REALLY
Ridabu 1 year ago 11
@Ridabu
At tthe river his hand is not more than a bluffcatcher..
Sycorexxx 1 year ago
@Sycorexxx Are you kidding me? Not more then bluffcatcher? You are just one another book player, very carefull player, I see, but againts top players can be good second pair easilly. In heads up is top pair strong hand againts agressive players. Only problem is, that Ivey played hs hand well and Lindgren couldnt be sure by his ace.
DukeBalaor 10 months ago
@DukeBalaor
So if I understand you correctly, you think Ivey would valuebet less then A6 on the river?
Sycorexxx 10 months ago 6
@Sycorexxx
I think, yes, it is possibility. Sometimes you bluffing like you value betting, it is best way. And how I said, he played that very well. It seems pretty strong call re raise on flop, bet turn and river :o) Just nice hand. I dont know, how Ivey play there. Many times your decision depend on reading people moves. I would probablly fold A on turn :o)))) But I am I, my poker game is different, then pros game :o) So I dont know. Still, I thing, 80 000 was good bet on river to 140 000
DukeBalaor 10 months ago
@Sycorexxx
I wanted to say, A isnt just catch bluffer, there is many hands, Ace could beat.
DukeBalaor 10 months ago
@Sycorexxx hear hear!
zandaofly 10 months ago
@Sycorexxx ummm, yeah. Aren't you watching the video?
superjeff14 6 months ago
must have been "there are a lot of hands that beat Erik" ^^
teemucroshere44 9 months ago
what would Larry David do ?
DonkeyMagnet99 1 year ago
@DonkeyMagnet99
She was terrible in Curb your enthusiasm
VisionApartments 1 year ago
what a pointless checkraise on the flop lol :D
heikkikaheli 1 year ago
Ivey:This one ! ... I cant show you!!!
mAn ivey is the mAn=)
krakerfox 1 year ago
in think the call from lingdren was a must in HU play.
ciaonegra 1 year ago
I hate erik lindgren he never smiles and always looks like he's just killed someone!
Be4TinGyoU 1 year ago
Everytime I see Phil Ivey he's bluffing. You'd think people learn after a while >_>
Sursion7 1 year ago
ivey usually bet very qick when he is bluffing look the bet on the turn ....and when he got a real hand he take a large time to think, that's true lol.
Furthermore23 1 year ago
well if lindgren is gonna take control of the pot by raising but then checkin on the next street, whats the point in raisin on the flop if ur not gonna follow through on the turn
krazyazn208 1 year ago
If you're playing three handed and you hit an ace you push that shit and if your opponent has you beat, you go home. Eric way over thought that one.because he was playing Ivey. I've seen him do that before, get a little chick-chick-chicken.
roos08824 1 year ago
I like how these two take their game professionaly, nothing personal , they are great friends , but at poker table - no friendship, max concentration
MrSmartComment 1 year ago
@MrSmartComment surprised? they are professional players you dumb cunt
RargonSE 1 year ago
This comment of mine was positive man, i wanted to say that despite they lose money to each other, they remain good friends . Why did you call me dumb cunt.... asshole
MrSmartComment 1 year ago
lol at Phil Gordon 0:52 when Ivey calls on the flop. "I don't get this play at all unless he's gonna try to take it away after the turn."
What else could he be doing?
Maybe looking for a showdown with 8 high?
cks119 1 year ago 10
He is deffo repping 8,9 or J,10 - Does look convincing :) i can see his cards lol
MikeAllenInDaHouse 1 year ago
yeah thats true phil ivey played that hand like he had the nut straight with 89.
Furthermore23 1 year ago
89 is not the nut straight QK is
jparkfosho 1 year ago
what an amazing bluff!
MrXtsy 1 year ago
1) position
2) erics biggest mistake of the hand: checking the big blind. FFS, we are 3 handed, and Phil limps the sb. Give me a break. Yes I realize Edog is a mega nit, but, he needs to raise his blind, period!
3)when Phil calls the raise on the flop, 89 seems very likely.
Bet the draw, get check raised, then call, then lead out on the turn. As the commentator says on the river, there are a TON of hands which Edog beats, and this is so very true
MrGnomemeat 1 year ago 2
@MrGnomemeat did you make over 7.000.000$ with poker too or why do you think you can say eric how he needs to play?
DonMillionOne 1 year ago
this is why irl poker is better than online poker.
iveys body language was saying "plz bet so i can get more chips outta you" (but then again it always is lol)
irl you can really maximise on bluff potential
Bladen12345 2 years ago
It's not such a bad laydown. Having top pair with a bad kicker is a shaky hand at best.
PointThree 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lindgren is a idiot, pot 226000, only for call 80, He have As, top pair, why fold, hahahaha IDIOT!!!!
zixzor1225 2 years ago
that's why he is playing on a final table. I'm sure he was putting ivey on 8,9 that's the reason. Besides, erick didn't have the best kicker.
moctezuma2008 1 year ago
hahahahahhaa YOUTUBE PRO
99Cookery 1 year ago
power of position :)
jibbers0 2 years ago 2
@jibbers0 THis was wierd tbh, wasnt phil in the smal blind? he should be out of postion then :S? cus sheryl folded the button then phil should be out of position , shouldnt he?
really wierd :P
thevoid1231 1 year ago
That bet on river was great! I mean he choose the best size.
Gregy1984 2 years ago
the man is billiant just his face u carnt read it thats wat makes a great poker player .if u havnt seen it type in phil ivey bluff vsbluff a million times better than this u wont beleve it
kingkeller101 2 years ago
LOL PHIL GORDON LOOOOOOL
neighborhoodgasman 2 years ago
phil ivey is the fuckin man..... i love watching him play
soonermagic24 2 years ago 3
Horrible played by Lindgren...
What was he expecting that Ivey would check on the river after a bet on the turn?
He knew that bet on the river was comming and still he called the turn. Was he hoping to get tow pairs or 3 of a kind on the river. Damn noobish. I don't know why this guy is pro. No vids I've seen about him are impressive at all.
0y5t3r 2 years ago
agree with you...
mgabim 2 years ago
because he was playing phil ivey, the best of all time. tough to play perfect against that kind of competition, would you play perfectly staring at phil ivey?
MikeyRGuitar 2 years ago
@0y5t3r your a noob. theres a reason he is a pro your retard.
hal2342 2 years ago
Lindgren screwd up, he's nothing special.
cody2l 2 years ago 2
yea checking the turn after check raising the flop...makes him look very weak/uncomfortable to me
treezX 2 years ago
I also agree
BufasB 2 years ago
@0y5t3r He prolly knows phil ivey is agressive and wanted him to call.
keyblade46 2 years ago
One of t he best bluffs Ive ever seen, Phil played it beutiful
nils4545 2 years ago
hes da best ever
23MVP24 2 years ago
man phil ivey's poker face scares the crap out of me, he's like a machine
Krogoth04 2 years ago 7
Ivey est vraiment un super joueur !!!
settocik 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
phil ivey is an active member in the ku klux klan, his primairy goal in the kkk is to lynch and kill all niggers on this planet...
phil ivey is actually a white dude who painted himself brown, no joke guys
Livenderrr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
name : Dujeyo at full tilt can u donate me plz 2 - 3 $ ? im totally busted and need something to eat ...
dustyn1986 2 years ago
you spelt the 'n' word wrong, Niger is a country... moron
Shiggsy 2 years ago 5
um, stfu, nobody cares.
Prophilla 2 years ago
thats amazing
xexodusx 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
people are to easily intimidated by ivy people just need to learn to call him he bluffs alot its impossible to always have the best hand!
recognizereal1 2 years ago
easier said than done
melrodpush 2 years ago
I would shout 'I'VE GOT A BOMB' and in the ensuing confusion I'd run off with as many chips as possible.
Struckgold 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what an idiot this Lindgren
mandorla2200 2 years ago
Mandoria, you have no idea what you are talking about. Ace rag in that position against Ivy at that point of the game...a lay down is perfectly understandable. Lindgren is one of the best players in the world, while you are simply a bystander, posting kneejerk anonymous insults with no thought or reason behind them.
cds2006 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the probability is the most important, he mustn't bet, he has nothing, I could crush him in a few hands if he plays in this way
mandorla2200 2 years ago
get outta here you complete idiot. crush ivey in a few hands. my goodness
SPIDER 2 years ago 12
you....nah
melrodpush 2 years ago
L.O.L. like the title again it's bluffing. and if ivey finds out that ur a tight player like u pretty much already told everyone. he's just gonna bust you when he gets the nuts.
dh144498 2 years ago
A NL2 player would have crushed ivey in that spot.
Mockni 2 years ago 11
english please?
TraumaER 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
New Season (6) of POKER AFTER DARK uploaded at my channel, check it out !!
:)
EPICPoker 2 years ago
If I ever play Phil Ivey, whenever he's on the button I would fold everytime or push all in before he would out play me.
timjr5000 2 years ago 3
well you'll probably never have to worry about that
calvin1392 2 years ago 21
LOL well said
wilsontieu 2 years ago
yea but to play Ivey you'd need a lot of money. Are you willing to push 20k of your own money all in against him? lol
223fl 2 years ago
well there you, as thats would you would do, 1. you would never be able to play him and 2. hes already beat you, with that attitude
paulwestby 2 years ago
metallicrema you idiot commentator say all right, it's you stupid
TecktonickBestDancer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ivey looks like he's scared when he puts on his poker face.
cc8277 2 years ago
bluffing only works with pro who had much ups and downs.
icool001 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ivey had ACE high, not EIGHT... stupid commentator.
metallicrema 2 years ago
Ya, negative on ur useless comment. You waste of matter.
kbry118 2 years ago
this guy likes bluffing he do it really good, 95% of his blufffs work. i like his style
Furthermore23 2 years ago
you've kept a running tally of his bluffs?
Thanks for the statistics.
J3arc 2 years ago
hahaha
run2home93 2 years ago
Here's solution to this hand:
The key element here is stack sizes of Ivey (almost 400k) and Lindgren (260k). Before the turn Lindgren knew he had better hand, so he raised, but when J showed on turn, he realised that if Ivey had 98 or KQ (both very probable) he had no chance. So he only call Ivey's turn bet, because if he reraised, ivey would try to go all-in to bluff him out or get all his chips (and lindgren with A + small kicker couldnt afford to call that raise).
TheMrLebowski 2 years ago
So he decided to call to keep pot small and see what ivey would do on the river. Ivey fired 3rd bullet. At this moment, lindgren still thought that his hand is PROBABLY better than ivey's, but he COULDN'T RISK another 80k with Ace with weak kicker! Why? If he called ivey's bet and lost, he would lose 8k (pf)+25k(flop)+40k(turn)+80k(river) = 157k in this hand and be left with only 260k - 157k = 103k.
TheMrLebowski 2 years ago
Ivey would be out of reach for him, and he could even lose 3rd place to Hines! Instead, he lost only 70k, and remained his 2nd place with somewhat nice stack
TheMrLebowski 2 years ago
Novices wouldn't play his kinda stakes so his got nothing to worry about, i just realized that haha
jpjames1 2 years ago
I like to see Ivey play an online novice. He probably stears clear of novices coz they would call that
jpjames1 2 years ago
I'm free
jpjames1 2 years ago
poker is all about bluffing
moonstar892 2 years ago
lol same thought, they were both lying horribly after the hand. Pros for you i guess.
asimioso 2 years ago
i watched the hand blind, i thought Erick had sumthn like Q10 as well, Funny how theyre both lieing at the end, "probly a good lay down", "what u have" "a draw". lol.
WhytyProd 2 years ago
bad fold saying he called the turn but nice betting by phil
MmmYkes 2 years ago
i know everything! Not like you who only knows 9/11 world trade center attack. Maybe you still dont know that. dumbdumb!
yantheman52 2 years ago
lmao retard!
asimioso 2 years ago
some people are really stupid.. They say that its an obvious bet on the river by ivey that he was bluffing.. but when ivey got a winning hand against allen cunningham and he only bet 35000 they also said its obvious that ivey had a good hand. Dont say anything as if you are like them you stupid dumbass!
yantheman52 2 years ago 19
You should go pro mate.. You seem to know everything..
Sycorexxx 2 years ago
@yantheman52 not really when that jack came down he could have straight ??? :S wich obv beats a pair dumb ass
RubenScouse 1 year ago
Now that was awsome.
bedbugdude 2 years ago 5
phil ivey is the best
medette 3 years ago 5
there's one wrong thing in this game, how the heck is ivey both on the button and small blind at the same time? it's not heads-up, it's 3-handed, he should act as first pre-flop and last post-flop :S
i think the dealer made some mistakes and anybody at the table noticed that!:D
MrCheckRaise1 3 years ago 2
dead small
r3ddrag0nx 3 years ago
ok thanks
MrCheckRaise1 3 years ago
MONSTER TELL @ 2:38!!!!
drewster85 3 years ago
love the actions
pokerpokerfan 3 years ago
I think ..just A better Kicker
Lowraiser1 3 years ago
If Erics kicker was higher he may have called, I think he put Phil on A7 (2 pair) or maybe A9.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
he put ivey on 8,9
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
If he put Ivey on 8,9 then why did he call him on the turn, he would of had no outs. At the end of the day I think he really had no clue on what Phil might of had leaving him to decide if his one pair was strong enough.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
you question my logic by asking me a stupid question.You said he put Ivey on ace 7 (2 pair)so why did he call a bet on the turn?.He would have never played A7 like that or A9 so at the end of the day I think your half a donkey! and I would tell you why he put him on 8,9 or 10,9 of clubs but I would be teaching you too much about poker.
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
LMAO. You're really not that bright are you. I can guarentee you he knew Ivey didn't hit a straight, 10,9 clubs what the fuck? He would of gone all in if that was the case. He didn't trust his kicker against Ivey's bet so fuck off.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
how can you put him on Ace 9? A9 would never bet that river! and why did you say A7?if he had Ace7 lindgren would have folded on the turn with no out(thats by your logic) tell me how you came to that conclusion? the way the hand was played 8,9 is the most likely hand.Just wait until other people reply to this comment and you will see...it is possible that ivey had A7 but probably not.
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
It's really quite simple, A9 would of out kicked him would it not? If Eric had of hit a 6 on the river, he very well would of chanced his luck that Ivey had the 9 not the 7. If an A hit on the river then Eric would of most likely ruled Ivey off the A and raised. Neither hit so he wasn't prepared to gamble. It could be the only possible logic Eric could of used to bet the way he did. I welcome other peoples opinions myself.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
yes, at the end of the day , i agree. 89 is the most logical. for calling the turn, see my comment above.
a9 is plausible, but i'd doubt it. i believe wit a9 ivey can value bet that river, but most likely not.
r3ddrag0nx 3 years ago
he knows what iveys capable of on the button which is why he called the turn. however, he knew he was going to be unprepared for a river bet, so his turn call is questionable. if he was going to call the turn he might as well raise or fold.
r3ddrag0nx 3 years ago
and i would fold knowing im playin ivey oop.
r3ddrag0nx 3 years ago
thanks for your reply...you are a real player!
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
My point exactly, he wanted to hit again on the river which means he must not of placed Ivey on a straight on the turn, and he would of known the river wouldn't of helped a straight draw. So why didn't he call with top pair on the river, and no flush draws? Cause he thought Iveys top pair was better than his top pair.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
agreed, he knew ivy had no straight, even novices could of read that, eric should have known by the bet size it was a bluff, anyhow............
HalfodozenHemroids 3 years ago
but it's Phil Ivey, you never know =P
HiLoPicoLo 2 years ago 2
wtf do you mean? size of his bet says bluff? u only know hes bluffin cos you can see his cards, perfect size bet if u ask me.
WhytyProd 2 years ago 3
dont you act all cocky and "pro" I bet you're a novice online playmoney player.. sp just shut it ;=)
Screamo1818 2 years ago
hey buddy check out the comment that r3ddragonyx left.
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
Think whatever you like Pal, so apparantly he knew Ivey had a straight but just thought he would donate him some extra chips on 4th street, yep ok. I challenge you to a poker match and we will see just how good you really are (not)
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
so when are we playing pal? and you put ivey on ace9 or ace 7 so why would he donate to him on fourth street idiot! does a6 have outs against a7? NO! and calling with 3 outs is a stupid play anyway so get the fuck out of here fish!
TheDotComKid84 3 years ago
Do you play online? I play at partypoker so if you want a heads up against me join up unless you have somewhere else in mind, donk.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
im going to have to side with dotcom
eric probably felt he had showdown value on the turn still
r3ddrag0nx 3 years ago
Ivey bluffs to often.
brassknuckleduster 3 years ago
if it was me iam allin on the flops and Ivey obviously gonna fold ! Erick insane !
luanlam 3 years ago
All in on the flop would be a really stupid bet.
Crocodile25 3 years ago 2
thats why you go broke son, go back to the play money kiddy pool
laffizzle 3 years ago
He didnt know what Phil had,thats why hes Ivey.
sweetmohawklady 3 years ago
i think he had him on 89 or a8
deewhyelayin 3 years ago
he might have thought phil had king queen..
musicizgood 3 years ago
Very strange hand, and you would expect Phil would've raise KQ heads up preflop. Phil was thinking a few levels above Lindgren here I suppose. Maybe Lindgren put Ivey on a very tricky play with AA?
Crocodile25 3 years ago
If Lindgren is putting him on a particular hand, its obviously 89. Limping in, betting the draw, calling the raise because its open ended and then betting when he hits the jack. I think Ivey would be 3 betting AA/T7 on the flop, so you can't really put him on either of those hands. JT would also make a lot of sense because Lindgren did not look like he had an ace or straight, giving Ivey essentially the nut two pair. I'd think he'd almost definitely be folding J7 to the flop check raise.
floydisgod 3 years ago
man is leverage an effective technique or wat 2 bluff. i use it a lot & it works marvelous.
republicansridiots 3 years ago
Check out the jugs on the big bitch behind Lindgren on the left.
Thats what you call a pair of aces.
Thats not a good hand, its a good handfull.
allteesup1 3 years ago 4
lmao just looking in the back round i didnt even notice that until now yeah no kidding that will be a handful
johnymarz93 3 years ago
lol nice bluff
HustlerJerbear 3 years ago
"there are a lot of hands eric can beat" lol what a schmuck.
ryukenrock 3 years ago
Wow what a bluff
beda227 3 years ago
LOL LOOK AT PHIL IVEY FACE AT 0:43
imsain9998 3 years ago
What the hell are you talkin about? There is nothing particularly funny at that point in the video
PhanatixDDH 3 years ago