Added: 4 years ago
From: Sycorexxx
Views: 131,178
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (186)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Phil Ivey = :-D

  • here we go again with the youtube poker pros! WELL i think it was an ok fold, if your in lindgreens situation hes thinkin i got A 6.. phil ivey might have A J OR A K anything beterr than 6, online poker, and casino poker is different than these kind of poker tournaments. 

  • ATTENTION!!

    Want to learn WHAT it takes to be a professional poker player/ win at poker? Learn from the pro's of the mid stakes!

    Visit our channel RigTheRake, just click the name, and you are on your way to be successfull at this magnificent game!

    So Click the name

    /RigTheRake

  • 3:48 nice boobs in the background :D

  • Lindgren called the turn and he already knew ivey would bet the river after a check, the 4 of diamonds didnt change anything, why lindgren chagged his mind?

  • US players are able to play real poker on pokerview

  • Lingrens only bad move was reraising the flop. He could of just called down to the river and played this top pair as a bluff catcher.

  • Non_USA_players_sign_up_at_Ful­l_Tilt_Poker_with_referral-cod­e:FTUS600_and_you_will_get_a_6­00$_signing_bonus

  • Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_pl­ayers_for_real_money_deposits_­and_when_you_sign_up_with_Refe­rral_Code:FTUS600-you_get_a_60­0$_bonus

  • Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_pl­ayers_for_real_money_deposits_­and_when_you_sign_up_with_Refe­rral_Code:FTUS600-you_get_a_60­0$_bonus

  • hehê_î_sìgñed_ùp_ãt_fûll_tilt_­pôkèr

    _úsîng_referrãl_codë:_YOU600_â­ñd_gõt_â_600_Ðòllar_boñüs

  • Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts_USA_pl­ayers_for_real-money_deposits_­and_when_you_sign_up_with_Refe­rral_Code:FTUS600_you_get_a_60­0$_bonus

  • Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at­_account_sign-up_with_Full_Til­t_Poker_gets_you_a_600$_bonus

  • When_creating_a_new_account_at­_Full_Tilt_Poker_use_the_Refer­ral_Code:FTUS600_for_a_600$_si­gn-up_bonus

  • Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at­_account_sign_up_with_Full_Til­t_Poker_gets_you-a_600$_bonus

  • phil gordon is an idiot.

  • Lindgren is never impressive.

  • Phil Galfold said he got his first free bankroll from Pokerfrik website.

  • I was up til 4am last night playing webcam poker on pokerview. Forget these fake bot sites you guys gotta see this shit man it’s the perfect online poker man.

  • @Denmarkianboyy i bet u built ur bank roll from the $50 dollars u got from pokerficks, everyone else seems to have.

  • @soal09 yup. i dont think ivey puts him on a 10... no way. he knows he either checkraised empty or had a weak ace. and with his behaviour at that turn, which puts 89 straight in there, KQ, AJ etc ivey knows exactly where's he's at. this is so ***** good pokerthinking. love it

  • Phil Gordon is a wuss .. He say's "very intimidating for Cheryl. If I was her with 3 people left and get to say I played against those 2 guys I would not be intimidated because obviously I have nothing to loose and a huge opportunity to gain.

  • "There are a lot of hands that Erik can beat" UHM NOT REALLY

  • @Ridabu

    At tthe river his hand is not more than a bluffcatcher..

  • @Sycorexxx Are you kidding me? Not more then bluffcatcher? You are just one another book player, very carefull player, I see, but againts top players can be good second pair easilly. In heads up is top pair strong hand againts agressive players. Only problem is, that Ivey played hs hand well and Lindgren couldnt be sure by his ace.

  • @DukeBalaor

    So if I understand you correctly, you think Ivey would valuebet less then A6 on the river?

  • @Sycorexxx

    I think, yes, it is possibility. Sometimes you bluffing like you value betting, it is best way. And how I said, he played that very well. It seems pretty strong call re raise on flop, bet turn and river :o) Just nice hand. I dont know, how Ivey play there. Many times your decision depend on reading people moves. I would probablly fold A on turn :o)))) But I am I, my poker game is different, then pros game :o) So I dont know. Still, I thing, 80 000 was good bet on river to 140 000

  • @Sycorexxx

    I wanted to say, A isnt just catch bluffer, there is many hands, Ace could beat.

  • @Sycorexxx hear hear!

  • @Sycorexxx ummm, yeah. Aren't you watching the video?

  • must have been "there are a lot of hands that beat Erik" ^^

  • what would Larry David do ?

  • @DonkeyMagnet99

    She was terrible in Curb your enthusiasm

  • what a pointless checkraise on the flop lol :D

  • Ivey:This one ! ... I cant show you!!!

    mAn ivey is the mAn=)

  • in think the call from lingdren was a must in HU play.

  • I hate erik lindgren he never smiles and always looks like he's just killed someone!

  • Everytime I see Phil Ivey he's bluffing. You'd think people learn after a while >_>

  • ivey usually bet very qick when he is bluffing look the bet on the turn ....and when he got a real hand he take a large time to think, that's true lol.

  • well if lindgren is gonna take control of the pot by raising but then checkin on the next street, whats the point in raisin on the flop if ur not gonna follow through on the turn

  • If you're playing three handed and you hit an ace you push that shit and if your opponent has you beat, you go home. Eric way over thought that one.because he was playing Ivey. I've seen him do that before, get a little chick-chick-chicken.

  • I like how these two take their game professionaly, nothing personal , they are great friends , but at poker table - no friendship, max concentration

  • @MrSmartComment surprised? they are professional players you dumb cunt

  • This comment of mine was positive man, i wanted to say that despite they lose money to each other, they remain good friends . Why did you call me dumb cunt.... asshole

  • lol at Phil Gordon 0:52 when Ivey calls on the flop. "I don't get this play at all unless he's gonna try to take it away after the turn."

    What else could he be doing?

    Maybe looking for a showdown with 8 high?

  • He is deffo repping 8,9 or J,10 - Does look convincing :) i can see his cards lol

  • yeah thats true phil ivey played that hand like he had the nut straight with 89.

  • 89 is not the nut straight QK is

  • what an amazing bluff!

  • 1) position

    2) erics biggest mistake of the hand: checking the big blind. FFS, we are 3 handed, and Phil limps the sb. Give me a break. Yes I realize Edog is a mega nit, but, he needs to raise his blind, period!

    3)when Phil calls the raise on the flop, 89 seems very likely.

    Bet the draw, get check raised, then call, then lead out on the turn. As the commentator says on the river, there are a TON of hands which Edog beats, and this is so very true

  • @MrGnomemeat did you make over 7.000.000$ with poker too or why do you think you can say eric how he needs to play?

  • this is why irl poker is better than online poker.

    iveys body language was saying "plz bet so i can get more chips outta you" (but then again it always is lol)

    irl you can really maximise on bluff potential

  • It's not such a bad laydown. Having top pair with a bad kicker is a shaky hand at best.

  • that's why he is playing on a final table. I'm sure he was putting ivey on 8,9 that's the reason. Besides, erick didn't have the best kicker.

  • hahahahahhaa YOUTUBE PRO

  • power of position :)

  • @jibbers0 THis was wierd tbh, wasnt phil in the smal blind? he should be out of postion then :S? cus sheryl folded the button then phil should be out of position , shouldnt he?

    really wierd :P

  • That bet on river was great! I mean he choose the best size.

  • the man is billiant just his face u carnt read it thats wat makes a great poker player .if u havnt seen it type in phil ivey bluff vsbluff a million times better than this u wont beleve it

  • LOL PHIL GORDON LOOOOOOL

  • phil ivey is the fuckin man..... i love watching him play

  • Horrible played by Lindgren...

    What was he expecting that Ivey would check on the river after a bet on the turn?

    He knew that bet on the river was comming and still he called the turn. Was he hoping to get tow pairs or 3 of a kind on the river. Damn noobish. I don't know why this guy is pro. No vids I've seen about him are impressive at all.

  • agree with you...

  • because he was playing phil ivey, the best of all time. tough to play perfect against that kind of competition, would you play perfectly staring at phil ivey?

  • @0y5t3r your a noob. theres a reason he is a pro your retard.

  • Lindgren screwd up, he's nothing special.

  • yea checking the turn after check raising the flop...makes him look very weak/uncomfortable to me

  • I also agree

  • @0y5t3r He prolly knows phil ivey is agressive and wanted him to call.

  • One of t he best bluffs Ive ever seen, Phil played it beutiful

  • hes da best ever

  • man phil ivey's poker face scares the crap out of me, he's like a machine

  • Ivey est vraiment un super joueur !!!

  • you spelt the 'n' word wrong, Niger is a country... moron

  • um, stfu, nobody cares.

  • thats amazing

  • easier said than done

  • I would shout 'I'VE GOT A BOMB' and in the ensuing confusion I'd run off with as many chips as possible.

  • Mandoria, you have no idea what you are talking about. Ace rag in that position against Ivy at that point of the game...a lay down is perfectly understandable. Lindgren is one of the best players in the world, while you are simply a bystander, posting kneejerk anonymous insults with no thought or reason behind them.

  • get outta here you complete idiot. crush ivey in a few hands. my goodness

  • you....nah

  • L.O.L. like the title again it's bluffing. and if ivey finds out that ur a tight player like u pretty much already told everyone. he's just gonna bust you when he gets the nuts.

  • A NL2 player would have crushed ivey in that spot.

  • english please?

  • If I ever play Phil Ivey, whenever he's on the button I would fold everytime or push all in before he would out play me.

  • well you'll probably never have to worry about that

  • LOL well said

  • yea but to play Ivey you'd need a lot of money. Are you willing to push 20k of your own money all in against him? lol

  • well there you, as thats would you would do, 1. you would never be able to play him and 2. hes already beat you, with that attitude

  • metallicrema you idiot commentator say all right, it's you stupid

  • bluffing only works with pro who had much ups and downs.

  • Ya, negative on ur useless comment. You waste of matter.

  • this guy likes bluffing he do it really good, 95% of his blufffs work. i like his style

  • you've kept a running tally of his bluffs?

    Thanks for the statistics.

  • hahaha

  • Here's solution to this hand:

    The key element here is stack sizes of Ivey (almost 400k) and Lindgren (260k). Before the turn Lindgren knew he had better hand, so he raised, but when J showed on turn, he realised that if Ivey had 98 or KQ (both very probable) he had no chance. So he only call Ivey's turn bet, because if he reraised, ivey would try to go all-in to bluff him out or get all his chips (and lindgren with A + small kicker couldnt afford to call that raise).

  • So he decided to call to keep pot small and see what ivey would do on the river. Ivey fired 3rd bullet. At this moment, lindgren still thought that his hand is PROBABLY better than ivey's, but he COULDN'T RISK another 80k with Ace with weak kicker! Why? If he called ivey's bet and lost, he would lose 8k (pf)+25k(flop)+40k(turn)+80k(r­iver) = 157k in this hand and be left with only 260k - 157k = 103k.

  • Ivey would be out of reach for him, and he could even lose 3rd place to Hines! Instead, he lost only 70k, and remained his 2nd place with somewhat nice stack

  • Novices wouldn't play his kinda stakes so his got nothing to worry about, i just realized that haha

  • I like to see Ivey play an online novice. He probably stears clear of novices coz they would call that

  • I'm free

  • poker is all about bluffing

  • lol same thought, they were both lying horribly after the hand. Pros for you i guess.

  • i watched the hand blind, i thought Erick had sumthn like Q10 as well, Funny how theyre both lieing at the end, "probly a good lay down", "what u have" "a draw". lol.

  • bad fold saying he called the turn but nice betting by phil

  • i know everything! Not like you who only knows 9/11 world trade center attack. Maybe you still dont know that. dumbdumb!

  • lmao retard!

  • some people are really stupid.. They say that its an obvious bet on the river by ivey that he was bluffing.. but when ivey got a winning hand against allen cunningham and he only bet 35000 they also said its obvious that ivey had a good hand. Dont say anything as if you are like them you stupid dumbass!

  • You should go pro mate.. You seem to know everything..

  • @yantheman52 not really when that jack came down he could have straight ??? :S wich obv beats a pair dumb ass

  • Now that was awsome.

  • phil ivey is the best

  • there's one wrong thing in this game, how the heck is ivey both on the button and small blind at the same time? it's not heads-up, it's 3-handed, he should act as first pre-flop and last post-flop :S

    i think the dealer made some mistakes and anybody at the table noticed that!:D

  • dead small

  • ok thanks

  • MONSTER TELL @ 2:38!!!!

  • love the actions

  • I think ..just A better Kicker

  • If Erics kicker was higher he may have called, I think he put Phil on A7 (2 pair) or maybe A9.

  • he put ivey on 8,9

  • If he put Ivey on 8,9 then why did he call him on the turn, he would of had no outs. At the end of the day I think he really had no clue on what Phil might of had leaving him to decide if his one pair was strong enough.

  • you question my logic by asking me a stupid question.You said he put Ivey on ace 7 (2 pair)so why did he call a bet on the turn?.He would have never played A7 like that or A9 so at the end of the day I think your half a donkey! and I would tell you why he put him on 8,9 or 10,9 of clubs but I would be teaching you too much about poker.

  • LMAO. You're really not that bright are you. I can guarentee you he knew Ivey didn't hit a straight, 10,9 clubs what the fuck? He would of gone all in if that was the case. He didn't trust his kicker against Ivey's bet so fuck off.

  • how can you put him on Ace 9? A9 would never bet that river! and why did you say A7?if he had Ace7 lindgren would have folded on the turn with no out(thats by your logic) tell me how you came to that conclusion? the way the hand was played 8,9 is the most likely hand.Just wait until other people reply to this comment and you will see...it is possible that ivey had A7 but probably not.

  • It's really quite simple, A9 would of out kicked him would it not? If Eric had of hit a 6 on the river, he very well would of chanced his luck that Ivey had the 9 not the 7. If an A hit on the river then Eric would of most likely ruled Ivey off the A and raised. Neither hit so he wasn't prepared to gamble. It could be the only possible logic Eric could of used to bet the way he did. I welcome other peoples opinions myself.

  • yes, at the end of the day , i agree. 89 is the most logical. for calling the turn, see my comment above.

    a9 is plausible, but i'd doubt it. i believe wit a9 ivey can value bet that river, but most likely not.

  • he knows what iveys capable of on the button which is why he called the turn. however, he knew he was going to be unprepared for a river bet, so his turn call is questionable. if he was going to call the turn he might as well raise or fold.

  • and i would fold knowing im playin ivey oop.

  • thanks for your reply...you are a real player!

  • My point exactly, he wanted to hit again on the river which means he must not of placed Ivey on a straight on the turn, and he would of known the river wouldn't of helped a straight draw. So why didn't he call with top pair on the river, and no flush draws? Cause he thought Iveys top pair was better than his top pair.

  • agreed, he knew ivy had no straight, even novices could of read that, eric should have known by the bet size it was a bluff, anyhow............

  • but it's Phil Ivey, you never know =P

  • wtf do you mean? size of his bet says bluff? u only know hes bluffin cos you can see his cards, perfect size bet if u ask me.

  • dont you act all cocky and "pro" I bet you're a novice online playmoney player.. sp just shut it ;=)

  • hey buddy check out the comment that r3ddragonyx left.

  • Think whatever you like Pal, so apparantly he knew Ivey had a straight but just thought he would donate him some extra chips on 4th street, yep ok. I challenge you to a poker match and we will see just how good you really are (not)

  • so when are we playing pal? and you put ivey on ace9 or ace 7 so why would he donate to him on fourth street idiot! does a6 have outs against a7? NO! and calling with 3 outs is a stupid play anyway so get the fuck out of here fish!

  • Do you play online? I play at partypoker so if you want a heads up against me join up unless you have somewhere else in mind, donk.

  • im going to have to side with dotcom

    eric probably felt he had showdown value on the turn still

  • Ivey bluffs to often.

  • if it was me iam allin on the flops and Ivey obviously gonna fold ! Erick insane !

  • All in on the flop would be a really stupid bet.

  • thats why you go broke son, go back to the play money kiddy pool

  • He didnt know what Phil had,thats why hes Ivey.

  • i think he had him on 89 or a8

  • he might have thought phil had king queen..

  • Very strange hand, and you would expect Phil would've raise KQ heads up preflop. Phil was thinking a few levels above Lindgren here I suppose. Maybe Lindgren put Ivey on a very tricky play with AA?

  • If Lindgren is putting him on a particular hand, its obviously 89. Limping in, betting the draw, calling the raise because its open ended and then betting when he hits the jack. I think Ivey would be 3 betting AA/T7 on the flop, so you can't really put him on either of those hands. JT would also make a lot of sense because Lindgren did not look like he had an ace or straight, giving Ivey essentially the nut two pair. I'd think he'd almost definitely be folding J7 to the flop check raise.

  • man is leverage an effective technique or wat 2 bluff. i use it a lot & it works marvelous.

  • Check out the jugs on the big bitch behind Lindgren on the left.

    Thats what you call a pair of aces.

    Thats not a good hand, its a good handfull.

  • lmao just looking in the back round i didnt even notice that until now yeah no kidding that will be a handful

  • lol nice bluff

  • "there are a lot of hands eric can beat" lol what a schmuck.

  • Wow what a bluff

  • LOL LOOK AT PHIL IVEY FACE AT 0:43

  • What the hell are you talkin about? There is nothing particularly funny at that point in the video