I like morons think by watching a simple youtube video that they can call that "research" and say stupid shit like ohho "9/11 was an inside job" I did my research... you should really look into both sides before you take something and run with it. the science behind the buildings falling matches up look at the nist report that's real science. and like our government can plant bombs in a building but not Saddam? LOL seriously stfu.
Another thing - it should not take an event like the 9/11 attacks to make us think the media is untrustworthy. That quality is as old as man itself. I'm glad people are more skeptical about media and government as a result of 9/11 but they really misplace a lot of energy and effort on speculation that would be much better channeled towards more productive theories.
@lovelara2 Almost anything would be more productive! Learn about Mexican or Chinese history! Learn all the countries in the world! Learn about what's going on the middle east right now! Read a biography of someone important! Learn chemistry! Learn computer science! Learn astrophysics! Learn Chinese or Spanish or Russian or Hindi or Urdu! These would all be more productive.
What good has the 9/11 truth movement produced so far? Has it created any tangible benefits aside from empty conjecture?
if you prefer just tell me your hobbies like walking on the beach in the moonlight and listening to old 80's records in your underwear at 2 AM because this is more fun to talk about
What is wrong with calling a spade a spade? The 9/11 truth movement is a theory of a conspiracy within the US government, hence "conspiracy theory."
Why don't you conduct an experiment to provide empirical evidence for your allegations?
1500 engineers and architectures say it was a controlled demolition? Are they experts in the relevant fields? Please show me the scientific peer reviewed paper which shows conclusively there was demolition material in the wreckage.
who's gonna fund a peer reviewed scientific research paper on 9/11? really?! Seriously dude, are you trying to sound skeptical? logical? smart? 'cause you just sound like you're trying to deny the obvious truth
@lovelara2 Why doesn't one of those 1500 architects and engineers you say insist it was a controlled demolition fund it? I mean it's not like such people are poor. Did you think over that question very much? If the majority of Americans are convinced the US government is covering something up it should be extremely easy to find funding for that.
Are you criticizing the scientific method? Are you suggesting that if an accurate paper were produced it would not be judged by its content?
I like morons think by watching a simple youtube video that they can call that "research" and say stupid shit like ohho "9/11 was an inside job" I did my research... you should really look into both sides before you take something and run with it. the science behind the buildings falling matches up look at the nist report that's real science. and like our government can plant bombs in a building but not Saddam? LOL seriously stfu.
TheAlexJonesCult 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Another thing - it should not take an event like the 9/11 attacks to make us think the media is untrustworthy. That quality is as old as man itself. I'm glad people are more skeptical about media and government as a result of 9/11 but they really misplace a lot of energy and effort on speculation that would be much better channeled towards more productive theories.
superdog797 4 months ago
@superdog797 the media is untrustworthy. what "more productive theories" would you suggest?
lovelara2 4 months ago
@lovelara2 Almost anything would be more productive! Learn about Mexican or Chinese history! Learn all the countries in the world! Learn about what's going on the middle east right now! Read a biography of someone important! Learn chemistry! Learn computer science! Learn astrophysics! Learn Chinese or Spanish or Russian or Hindi or Urdu! These would all be more productive.
What good has the 9/11 truth movement produced so far? Has it created any tangible benefits aside from empty conjecture?
superdog797 4 months ago
@superdog797 9/11 was a wake up call. you are obviously still asleep...
lovelara2 3 months ago
@lovelara2 just how sure are you that you're right about this whole inside job thing?
superdog797 3 months ago
@superdog797 what does it matter to you?
lovelara2 3 months ago
@lovelara2 Because if you're not that sure, you should be more reserved, and if you are so sure, I'd like to understand what makes you so sure.
superdog797 3 months ago
@superdog797 You couldn't understand what makes me so sure, because, as I stated in a previous comment, you are still asleep.
I have no desire to enter into this dialog with you.
lovelara2 3 months ago
@lovelara2 do you think it's due to my lack of knowledge of things or due to some error in my way of thinking
superdog797 3 months ago
if you prefer just tell me your hobbies like walking on the beach in the moonlight and listening to old 80's records in your underwear at 2 AM because this is more fun to talk about
superdog797 3 months ago
What is wrong with calling a spade a spade? The 9/11 truth movement is a theory of a conspiracy within the US government, hence "conspiracy theory."
Why don't you conduct an experiment to provide empirical evidence for your allegations?
1500 engineers and architectures say it was a controlled demolition? Are they experts in the relevant fields? Please show me the scientific peer reviewed paper which shows conclusively there was demolition material in the wreckage.
superdog797 4 months ago
@superdog797 here you go, spade :)
watch?v=I6j53jJglH0
watch the whole thing.
lovelara2 4 months ago
who's gonna fund a peer reviewed scientific research paper on 9/11? really?! Seriously dude, are you trying to sound skeptical? logical? smart? 'cause you just sound like you're trying to deny the obvious truth
lovelara2 4 months ago
@lovelara2 Why doesn't one of those 1500 architects and engineers you say insist it was a controlled demolition fund it? I mean it's not like such people are poor. Did you think over that question very much? If the majority of Americans are convinced the US government is covering something up it should be extremely easy to find funding for that.
Are you criticizing the scientific method? Are you suggesting that if an accurate paper were produced it would not be judged by its content?
superdog797 4 months ago
because we had a dialog on another video, i just checked your channel, and darling, just watch Southpark, THATS the truth :D
WikkitJuggalo 5 months ago
Nice...
Baffykoma 5 months ago