I agree, i'm from Canada on the west coast and when 9/11 happened after watching the coverage i thought to myself WASNT A HURRICANE GOING TO HIT NY THAT DAY? why did they emphasise "not a cloud in the sky" and in fact rainfall did fall that night it was stormy.. yet on 9/11 there was not A CLOUD IN THE SKY NEITHER WAS THERE ANY REMNANT OF RAINFALL? no puddles,nothing wet, EVEN THE SEAS WERE CALM in the 9/11 footage to me it truly was an anomaly, expecting one disaster and getting another.
The real planners were hoping it would wash away the dust, and cool fire pits left behind by the nuclear demolition charges.
Seismic data, thermal sat photos, and dust analysis easily prove such charges were used, and would only take an emergency order to the port authority to execute.
The had to put the "reflection pool" there to absorb radiation, standard at nuclear reactors. Code will not allow occupied buildings on that site, too much of a hazard.
@VinceP1974 came very close though. I believe all 3 New York airports reported heavy thunder storms that morning. which could say something about the static affects of the hurricane. i aint a scientist, but thats what one told me
Pity you could block your tone-deaf ears for a minute, turn off that godorful noise.... and consider WHY none of the weather reports ALL that week up to 9-11-01 made any mention of Hurrican Erin?
She was as big as Katrina...so why was NYNY not on Hurricane aleart with avengance?
OK, you can turn the noise back up and carry on not actually thinking for yourself.
I wish Hurricane Erin would have hit, then 9/11 wouldnt have happened.
Vierzbanator 15 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its a good thing it didn't get in the way of the False Flag Attack on NYC.
911 was an Inside Job made to be Obvious on Purpose.
VERBALMILITIA
marc27
verbalmilitia 1 month ago
Erin was an inside job !
baboonsquadron 3 months ago
I agree, i'm from Canada on the west coast and when 9/11 happened after watching the coverage i thought to myself WASNT A HURRICANE GOING TO HIT NY THAT DAY? why did they emphasise "not a cloud in the sky" and in fact rainfall did fall that night it was stormy.. yet on 9/11 there was not A CLOUD IN THE SKY NEITHER WAS THERE ANY REMNANT OF RAINFALL? no puddles,nothing wet, EVEN THE SEAS WERE CALM in the 9/11 footage to me it truly was an anomaly, expecting one disaster and getting another.
realistromeo 5 months ago
The real planners were hoping it would wash away the dust, and cool fire pits left behind by the nuclear demolition charges.
Seismic data, thermal sat photos, and dust analysis easily prove such charges were used, and would only take an emergency order to the port authority to execute.
The had to put the "reflection pool" there to absorb radiation, standard at nuclear reactors. Code will not allow occupied buildings on that site, too much of a hazard.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
fox news reported it. a large cold front was going to push it out to sea.
Skate3MonsterSkating 6 months ago
If the hurricane was hitting NYC that day , then there wouldnt' have been planes flying.
VinceP1974 6 months ago
@VinceP1974 came very close though. I believe all 3 New York airports reported heavy thunder storms that morning. which could say something about the static affects of the hurricane. i aint a scientist, but thats what one told me
sammysnakejones 5 months ago
Pity you could block your tone-deaf ears for a minute, turn off that godorful noise.... and consider WHY none of the weather reports ALL that week up to 9-11-01 made any mention of Hurrican Erin?
She was as big as Katrina...so why was NYNY not on Hurricane aleart with avengance?
OK, you can turn the noise back up and carry on not actually thinking for yourself.
mikerosepro 6 months ago