You have the right to a trial of your peers a jury of 12 this can not be a just trial,you are being tried here under admirilty law not common law.there is a huge difference between legal and lawful.
I'm confused about one thing. This is the second trial (chained) in which someone was arrested for filming the previous trial, but this trial is being filmed. How was that ok this time?
NH, Ridley Report, FreeStaters, Freekene, Sam Dodson and Dave Ridley thanks for the support everyone.
now help us support or friends at nambla.org thanks you so much tronclay thanks for those pics and your donation to nambla.org keep up the fight we won’t be pushed around by these pigs anymore- its appreciated our choice is our right, freedom of speech guys.
this cop is lieing about him grabbing the camera "cuz it looked expencive, and he didnt want it to fall, in case someone handcuffed him" its absurd... and the bs about where he tries to wear his badge too
Why are these people contracting with acts and statutes. Claim common law and dont contract with the court. I cant believe this man has a lawyer. Watch \English freemen in court. Learn the difference between legal and lawful........
The systems a joke, they all golf together, they talk behind closed doors and they steal the publics money, That is our court system in the US.TV is what most think its like(who never been in court) not like tv at all, you never get to tell Your side, Laywer vs laywer= buddy vs. buddy! Talk it out at tee time!
At 4:21, the Sirens go off, --they must be in hot pursuit of someone with a couch in the back yard or reports of a camera being used on public property, got to love the corrupt legal system we have today.
Sam or sam's folks please call: 608 466 9361... the first advice (not legal advice) I'm giving you is to drop that lawyer like a really bad habit. Lawyers don't do justice they make money.
You'll be PRESENTING yourself. You will not be consenting to any transaction of a security interest. You will waive all benefits (jail is a benefit).... and you will walk out of the courtroom... okay?
Here's a hint: The judge is the Plantation master, the Lawyers are the "middle managers" (both defense and prosecution), Sam... God bless his soul is the SLAVE awaiting the the outcome of the sale.
Talbot and his minions can only do their evil under illusion and deception... but I got the light and I'm bringing it.
TALBOT -> YOUR DAYS ON THE BENCH ARE NUMBERED... I"M COMING FOR YOU -> YOU'VE SCREWED WITH THE LAST LIVING MAN.... for the last time.
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308
p.s. Yeah Talbot... you will recognize me... when you see me. I'm taking you down. But I will never step onto your court. You have NO jurisdiction... outside of that court.... muhahahaha!
I can't believe that this case can be done impartially. I am amazed Burke is judging and defending HIS actions. This has to be appealed and criminal proceedings should start on the Burke.
Regardless of whether the sign is a valid order or not, the prohibition and arrest denies and violates the first amendment's freedom of the press clause and the fifth amendment's clause and right of a public trial. So any such order, rule or sign is unconstitutional and therefore void ab initio.(from the start). Sam and his attorney(s) need to sue in federal court for civil rights damages, false arrest and false imprisonment! This judge is another blatantly biased, corrupt and tyrannical one.
One is going to be hard pressed to find an honest, unbiased judge when it comes to family court. Money talks! VAWA owns the family court system - lot, stock, and barrel.
Did the judge answer the question for the defendant as "Probably not" at 53:30 in regard to the unsigned order questions?!!?!?! If this doesn't cry out for bias and recusal I don't know what does....
I can't believe the judge ruled that requests for any e-mails with facts of the case in too broad a request....what a joke.
Judge telling the jury what he believes Rivera meant by calling a question "tricky"?!?!? Did this guy get his legal training from a cracker jack box story book or what?
I just discovered there is no jury...so the last paragraph doesn't apply....if the judge doesn't find in favor of the defendant the appeal is going to be an automatic deal though...
Yes it would be. I busted my ass getting the video done and posted. If someone else wants to do the highligh summaries, It'll happily be posted to the video descrip.
Once you've stepped in this it's sure hard to scrape this sh!t off your shoe. Lots of dips makin lots of dough there wastin lots of time and money. Obscured truth is right....only someone getting payed for it would perpetuate this dribble, all these words for such a simple happening....so much simon says. Bravo Sam, they make your point with all the contradictory testimony,in the end only proving the value of the video as the superior witness.
Yep, he should have recused himself long before the case even made the docket. The judge is a sham in light of the legal system he's supposed to represent and enforce.
It is also my understand that his order was never signed. That in and of itself is a problem of serious magnitude.
@FlailingJunk : I am not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that it is settled law that an aggrieved party cannot be a judge in his own case. In contempt proceedings, the judge who brings the contempt charge cannot try the contempt case. This is a criminal contempt case brought by the DA, so I don't know if that rule applies. However, I don't think Burke should be allowed to sit in judgment in a case where he has a personal interest in the outcome.
You have the right to a trial of your peers a jury of 12 this can not be a just trial,you are being tried here under admirilty law not common law.there is a huge difference between legal and lawful.
2wheels88 9 months ago
i know that judge he gave my friend 6 years of community service cause his frinds had weed and they blamed him
mexiconotusa 9 months ago
I'm confused about one thing. This is the second trial (chained) in which someone was arrested for filming the previous trial, but this trial is being filmed. How was that ok this time?
toddmorrow1 10 months ago
@toddmorrow1 This is a trial of someone for recording in the court lobby, not in the courtroom. Courtroom recording is permitted.
GloriousCoconut 7 months ago
THAT SCUMBAG with the gay moustache ,and dress needs a dose of reality:)
spinlessbastard1 1 year ago
that beardo in the dress needs ,a kick to the ball bag ,OH DEAR :(
spinlessbastard1 1 year ago
get pen cameras fuck em
milo211000 1 year ago
get pen cameras fuck em
milo211000 1 year ago
NH, Ridley Report, FreeStaters, Freekene, Sam Dodson and Dave Ridley thanks for the support everyone.
now help us support or friends at nambla.org thanks you so much tronclay thanks for those pics and your donation to nambla.org keep up the fight we won’t be pushed around by these pigs anymore- its appreciated our choice is our right, freedom of speech guys.
RidleyReports 1 year ago
Is this the same nitwit powerlusting judge with the dyed hair and white mustache?
FILMING PUBLIC OFFICERS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY IS A MUST FOR HAVING ANY ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNMENT WHATSOEVER.
tabitie 1 year ago
unlucky 13th
Tzimnewman3 1 year ago
this cop is lieing about him grabbing the camera "cuz it looked expencive, and he didnt want it to fall, in case someone handcuffed him" its absurd... and the bs about where he tries to wear his badge too
longfootbuddy 1 year ago
he has a damn boner.. 1:38
longfootbuddy 1 year ago
Why are these people contracting with acts and statutes. Claim common law and dont contract with the court. I cant believe this man has a lawyer. Watch \English freemen in court. Learn the difference between legal and lawful........
crapgame11 1 year ago
The systems a joke, they all golf together, they talk behind closed doors and they steal the publics money, That is our court system in the US.TV is what most think its like(who never been in court) not like tv at all, you never get to tell Your side, Laywer vs laywer= buddy vs. buddy! Talk it out at tee time!
tone4624 1 year ago
how do you get to upload a video to Youtube that is 2 hours long?? Do you have to pay for it?
redneck500 1 year ago
At 4:21, the Sirens go off, --they must be in hot pursuit of someone with a couch in the back yard or reports of a camera being used on public property, got to love the corrupt legal system we have today.
MrBullfrog9876 1 year ago
@MrBullfrog9876 or some shcuumbags with am open beer, smoking pot, and half naked in front of the middleschool....
joe018687645 1 year ago
I might add... DID ANYONE POINT OUT THE ACCUSED?
WHO IS THE INJURED PARTY???
antibrainwash 2 years ago
Sam or sam's folks please call: 608 466 9361... the first advice (not legal advice) I'm giving you is to drop that lawyer like a really bad habit. Lawyers don't do justice they make money.
You'll be PRESENTING yourself. You will not be consenting to any transaction of a security interest. You will waive all benefits (jail is a benefit).... and you will walk out of the courtroom... okay?
antibrainwash 2 years ago
Here's a hint: The judge is the Plantation master, the Lawyers are the "middle managers" (both defense and prosecution), Sam... God bless his soul is the SLAVE awaiting the the outcome of the sale.
Talbot and his minions can only do their evil under illusion and deception... but I got the light and I'm bringing it.
antibrainwash 2 years ago
@antibrainwash calling sam a slave is a slap in the face of a slave.
joe018687645 1 year ago
TALBOT -> YOUR DAYS ON THE BENCH ARE NUMBERED... I"M COMING FOR YOU -> YOU'VE SCREWED WITH THE LAST LIVING MAN.... for the last time.
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308
p.s. Yeah Talbot... you will recognize me... when you see me. I'm taking you down. But I will never step onto your court. You have NO jurisdiction... outside of that court.... muhahahaha!
Be VERY afraid... I'm COMIN for ya!
antibrainwash 2 years ago
Listen to those words "I find a "Legal" argument here not a "Factual" argument.
Where is marc stevens when you need him.
THAWK3 2 years ago
I can't believe that this case can be done impartially. I am amazed Burke is judging and defending HIS actions. This has to be appealed and criminal proceedings should start on the Burke.
Deoptics8 2 years ago
Enough with the badge and cop's waist! Is that other old bailiff/court security guy just for decoration or show?
kinleyhard 2 years ago
Agree!
FathersAdvocate 2 years ago
Regardless of whether the sign is a valid order or not, the prohibition and arrest denies and violates the first amendment's freedom of the press clause and the fifth amendment's clause and right of a public trial. So any such order, rule or sign is unconstitutional and therefore void ab initio.(from the start). Sam and his attorney(s) need to sue in federal court for civil rights damages, false arrest and false imprisonment! This judge is another blatantly biased, corrupt and tyrannical one.
kinleyhard 2 years ago 3
One is going to be hard pressed to find an honest, unbiased judge when it comes to family court. Money talks! VAWA owns the family court system - lot, stock, and barrel.
FathersAdvocate 2 years ago
Is the second part in the making?
lordmetroid 2 years ago
yes
GloriousCoconut 2 years ago
Did the judge answer the question for the defendant as "Probably not" at 53:30 in regard to the unsigned order questions?!!?!?! If this doesn't cry out for bias and recusal I don't know what does....
I can't believe the judge ruled that requests for any e-mails with facts of the case in too broad a request....what a joke.
Judge telling the jury what he believes Rivera meant by calling a question "tricky"?!?!? Did this guy get his legal training from a cracker jack box story book or what?
Nickelodeon2002 2 years ago 2
Edit: "facts of the case IS too broad a request"
Nickelodeon2002 2 years ago
I just discovered there is no jury...so the last paragraph doesn't apply....if the judge doesn't find in favor of the defendant the appeal is going to be an automatic deal though...
Nickelodeon2002 2 years ago
Guys, a summary would be useful, with timepoints for any notable sections. Best of luck.
nanciqwerty 2 years ago
Yes it would be. I busted my ass getting the video done and posted. If someone else wants to do the highligh summaries, It'll happily be posted to the video descrip.
FreeKeene 2 years ago
Once you've stepped in this it's sure hard to scrape this sh!t off your shoe. Lots of dips makin lots of dough there wastin lots of time and money. Obscured truth is right....only someone getting payed for it would perpetuate this dribble, all these words for such a simple happening....so much simon says. Bravo Sam, they make your point with all the contradictory testimony,in the end only proving the value of the video as the superior witness.
Knowaymr 2 years ago
How is it that a judge can rule on a case involving his own order? Wouldn't he be a bit biased on the validity of an order he is responsible for?
FlailingJunk 2 years ago 14
Yep, he should have recused himself long before the case even made the docket. The judge is a sham in light of the legal system he's supposed to represent and enforce.
It is also my understand that his order was never signed. That in and of itself is a problem of serious magnitude.
Nickelodeon2002 2 years ago
@FlailingJunk : I am not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that it is settled law that an aggrieved party cannot be a judge in his own case. In contempt proceedings, the judge who brings the contempt charge cannot try the contempt case. This is a criminal contempt case brought by the DA, so I don't know if that rule applies. However, I don't think Burke should be allowed to sit in judgment in a case where he has a personal interest in the outcome.
ed2276 1 year ago