uhm... sooo, wats the point of the night-vision scope? Are you shooting AT something??? Or is it just so that you know you AREN'T shooting at something? :P
@Nutnfancy please raid Sadley's gun vault for this gun. At least put it on the sledge hammer one time. I think you have his SCAR right now but dude this gun would be so different from the ARs that it has to go on the table good or bad.
@MarcMaier1 the trigger has to be linked to the firing mechanism in the rear of the gun - they'll never be on par as with a conventional design's trigger.
With that said - a lot are downright bad. Disappointing to say the least. When someone tries the trigger you'll be jumping for joy if they say "it's not that bad"
cool gun, but id never go with a bullpup. its not as user friendly. mags in your armpit wen reloading, safetys are usualy kinda wierd, sight radius for irons usualy sux, mag releas can be crapy,fixed stock, not much of a choice wen it comes to you grabbing the 4end. you prty much hav to run a vertical grip or just not mind not getting ahold of the rifle. just my opinion and am not nokn any1 that likes bullpups.
I would like you to explain the forward blow coming out of the weapons muzzle at ignition (bullet)? Is this due to some anomaly in the weapon or suppressor mating? Flash suppressors are for flash, sound suppressors are for both. With the deceleration of the gases you should have very little to no visible blow coming out of a suppressed muzzle.
@InfantryChans91 no actually there is too much flash. go watch his video on the Yankee hill flash suppressor the noise is brought down but a suppressor is suppose to do both. its not like im expecting the flash to be gone but less than that.
@erikpeterson88 my bad i thought you were talking purely about the noise and was like 'what....' however it is night but suppressor's aren't my specialty
Nope the FS2000 hits the for sale rack. Several times I pulled the trigger and got a click with no bang. No go for the FS2000 as occasionally it won't pick up the first round off the mag and without watching it go in as you can't see it load you have no way of knowing if you even have a live round. In combat you would have died. The FS2000 is a no go. Back to the AK or AR. I might try a SCAR though but I just heard one shoot and there was a distinct sound when it ran out of ammo. Hmm...
This gun is specifically designed to use a suppressor and is almost as accurate as a top notch m-16 without one. Even with a gimpy 17" barrel! Light, compact and accurate with an amazingly quick return to zero. Its the best .223 cal. available to the public, right?
BTW im sick of everyone interchanging the word silencer for suppressor! We aren't talking about "hush puppies" here! A "silencer" for a .223 cal. rifle would be like a yard long and be the diameter of a coffee can! Forget .50 cal.!
"the sig 556 is a bit front heavy" hehe, indeed it is. I'm not entirely sure why it is but it feels like the thing has a full length bull barrel up there. Guessing the handguard is not exactly made of lightweight materials.
i've shot a fs 2000 5.56 and i can tell you the trigger absolutely sucks! And the shell ejection system only causes problems... crappy design all together.
They can, It's just more weight for the operator to carry :( Especially when you start moving up to higher velocity rifle rounds over little pistol cartridges.
@drogoscg1 Eh I want to see FN adopt the same rounds for the AK47 and fit the chamber properly to use it. But 5.56 is still pretty potent, same round M16s and M4s use while having a little bit of a lighter recoil due to their change in the operation of it's mechanics (according to FN where the gun shoots back into your shoulder rather than jumping up from the muzzle).
not rly the ar-15 can operate after 5000 rounds and its possible it still wont jam, to keep it from jamming as much as ppl say, they just need to keep the gun lubed, thats not a pig pain in the ass if you ask me since its extremely to dissasemble and reassemble the weapon
nope. The U.S. army isn't using the SCAR-L or the HK 416 because of politcal reasons. If anything their waiting for the Bushmaster Advance Combat Rifle.
yeah but the US army is really using the HK 416 and SCAR in mass numbers. If they end up getting HK 416s and SCARs the money is going to end up going to Europe and it wont circulate in the U.S.
Everything seems to be affected by politics now a days. lol
You do know FN Herstal has a USA branch right? The SCAR is manufactured in the States, not in Belgium. FN Belgium mostly produces the P90 and F2000 but apart from that, as far as I know, they are only involved in weapons design, not production. Pretty much the same goes for H&K. The HK416 (as far as I know) is produced in the USA. The main assault rifle produced in Germany is the G36.
Yes, that's true. Apart from those rifles though, there aren't any other rifles that have been positively tested by the US Army. The ACR has just gone into production but I think it's highly unlikely for that rifle to make it into the USMC or other department. The ACR will probably be used by private security contractors, but it's too expensive for the US Army. The FN SCAR is relatively cheap.
cheaper? So you think buying conversion kits for thousands of m4/m16s AND replacing massive stockpiles of 5.56 with the more expensive 6.8 round would be cheaper?
@GCVos The initial SCARs were produced in Belgium, not the USA. And yes, FN Herstal also manufactures the weapons, it's mostly it's civilian rifles and the SCAR + M249 SAW that are made in the US because that's their main market. They do have many more products than just the SCAR, you know.
@Heheh274 well the army does not use SCAR. the rangers and seals use it and the marines are trying to get it. a few guys in the army use the 416 though
I agree the suppressor does let out quite a bit of muzzle flash. I think it looks sweet though when he has the camera light off and you see the muzzle flash.
@nunvikingsofthesea Yea, except for AKs, mini 14s, Kel tecs, various .22s, and M1As. If he can't spend alot of time with the rifle he can't review it. So don't run your suck about things you don't know.
supressors can't get rid of all of the sound because the bullets are traveling at supersonic speeds than creating sonic booms. you can't do anything about that with out changing the round making it below supersonic speeds.
Not to mention theres a different between suppressors and silencers. suppressor is really just to hide the flash and obscure your possition. Silencers are to get rid of the sound as much as possible. Though if your not using sub sonic ammo then the silencer will work more like a suppressor.
I'd love to have a gun like that in my gun cabinet (well, ok, I'd like to every gun ever made and to be made in history in my gun cabinet, but life just ain't fair isn't it? ). Since we're on the subject of bullpumps, I'd like to know more about the FN FS 2000 and the Kel-Tec RFB. Also I hear mixed reviews on the reliability and durability of bullpumps (example, I hear the L85A1/A2 is a piece of crap in that category).
@nutnfancy, why do you not like bullpup triggers? i've never shot one. im hoping for an explanation as to why the trigger isn't as good as you'd like.
All bullup triggers suck, i use to shoot a hell load with AUG and i got to play around with Tavor (worst of all the bullup triggers i have ever held). The triggers are usually quite hard because the ''trigger assembly'' has to stretch from where the trigger is all the way to the back of the mag where the firing mechanism is. This metal is not rigid and makes slight bends, good example is like pushing a stiff flat wire against a wall or something.
have you tried the KEL-TEC RFB Bullpup? it shoots .308 Win. I understand that the trigger assembly would be around as crappy as all other bull pups. I don't know if the AK receiver similarities type would make a difference. Thanks for the info, TomsGuns!
Mr Nutnfancy, the Kel-Tec RFB bullpup is supposed to have a nice trigger on it, I think they have just recently gotten it into production. From what I hear the demand is still outpacing the production by quite a bit.
I just hope FN takes the F2000 concept and updates it a little. Like they said, tightens the groupings so you can auto for longer periods of time and not worry about the doom that is "spray and pray".
More than you can afford...Haha nah, its around 1500 without the stuff he has on it. Fully loaded like that dude's gun..Im guessing..3500-4k. I might be horribly wrong.
I was interested in gun control laws around the world at one point.i was under the impression that most of europe had restrictive laws like the UK.that is actually NOT the case, handguns and semi auto rifles are legal in most european countries there are some restrictions on
military ammo and magazine capacity in SOME nations, however almost all have required licensing and registration since the post ww2 period and this has led to confiscation ONLY in britian. and australia
On one hand, it can promote responsible use of guns because the use of the weapon can be traced back to your. On the other hand,t it can open up an avenue of abuse as the list of registered can be used for confiscation. The fact the confiscation CAN and HAS occured means that it WILL happen in the future.
this is my point gun control opponent insist registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation, and this is not so. massachusetts has required registration as has new york , switzerland gemany france sweden, look if they want you gun that bad and things get that bad they will just go house to house, my point is there are countries many coutries that have had registration since the post ww2 period that have NOT confiscated
and the plus is people are very reluctant to do somethig illegal or rash
(you can them liberals in america which is confusing in europe the term liberal has a meaning closer to the old classical liberal definition as opposed to your definition which means social liberal social democrat or SOCIALIST?)
AND WHEN I ASKED HER HOW SAFE
a natio nthat has baned guns was she shrugged and said
"well there are a sh%tload of stabbings you read about so its not paradice"
itoronto for example is safer than any american city
to make a long story shorter i see licensing and registration as a logical ballance between the rights of gun owners and those in society who feel
guns are a threat to public order
my feeling is properly regulated(devil is always in the details) guns dont have to be any more of a threat than an automobile,BUT in order to drive a car you must have a license and your automoble must be registered
there is a certain irony in the fact that some of the best weapons in world are made by belgians, christ they make waffels chocolate truffels they cant make up their minds if they speak dutch or french but dammit they can makes guns
"Hate bullpup triggers" AGREED!
i have a bullpup for my service rifle, and the trigger SUCKS!!
silentlightningdice 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from nutnfancy
Ug, not all bullpups have bad triggers! The trigger on my FS2000 is better than the trigger on most of my ars!
Jarek4 2 weeks ago
shit video...can't see a bloody thing!
nikanand1203 3 weeks ago
uhm... sooo, wats the point of the night-vision scope? Are you shooting AT something??? Or is it just so that you know you AREN'T shooting at something? :P
EpicWin0CriticalFail 1 month ago
Would love to see a review of this, love your work keep it up
MGCastle1 2 months ago 3
@MGCastle1 +1 would love to see a review of this and possibly a review for an affordable Night Vision option for us poor guys
sWoLaNdO 3 days ago
Nutnfancy likeability scale is what?
theSaltCat 3 months ago
@Nutnfancy please raid Sadley's gun vault for this gun. At least put it on the sledge hammer one time. I think you have his SCAR right now but dude this gun would be so different from the ARs that it has to go on the table good or bad.
deadmonkeyxxx 3 months ago
nice shooting despite the hard trigger.
SuperRip7 4 months ago
whats so special on a bullpup trigger?
MarcMaier1 6 months ago
@MarcMaier1 the trigger has to be linked to the firing mechanism in the rear of the gun - they'll never be on par as with a conventional design's trigger.
With that said - a lot are downright bad. Disappointing to say the least. When someone tries the trigger you'll be jumping for joy if they say "it's not that bad"
MaxAC40 6 months ago
@MaxAC40 thank you
MarcMaier1 6 months ago
cool gun, but id never go with a bullpup. its not as user friendly. mags in your armpit wen reloading, safetys are usualy kinda wierd, sight radius for irons usualy sux, mag releas can be crapy,fixed stock, not much of a choice wen it comes to you grabbing the 4end. you prty much hav to run a vertical grip or just not mind not getting ahold of the rifle. just my opinion and am not nokn any1 that likes bullpups.
humboldtgunguy 7 months ago
just the looks of that baby...
audioh0lic 7 months ago
I want to see nutn do a review on this beast
LWRCftw 7 months ago
that is awesome!
viss3n 7 months ago
holy crap! you must have spent atleaast 10k on that setup!
11finger11eleven 8 months ago
@11finger11eleven
1100 for Fs2000
Prolly 2000 maybe for the optics combined
and 1200 for the suppressor
so prolly around 4500.
braydenmaine 6 months ago
@braydenmaine hmmm i thought fs2000's were more expensive, anyhow, it looks really nice. thanks for the info.
11finger11eleven 6 months ago
Damn, that's so quiet. Didn't actually think a suppressor could do THAT much a difference.
Ubben1999 9 months ago
I want one of those!
gretsch1969 11 months ago
I would like you to explain the forward blow coming out of the weapons muzzle at ignition (bullet)? Is this due to some anomaly in the weapon or suppressor mating? Flash suppressors are for flash, sound suppressors are for both. With the deceleration of the gases you should have very little to no visible blow coming out of a suppressed muzzle.
terrynkay2000 11 months ago
Wat that set u back? $4000
HipHopAnonymousX 11 months ago
@HipHopAnonymousX way more than that.
YOWHATTHEHELLUP71 11 months ago
@HipHopAnonymousX For the whole setup, a WHOLE lot more than that.
Suppressors prolly 1 grand, the guns probably 1200 the night vision is prolly 7000
Kylef7735 10 months ago
bad ass
ganstuhh210 11 months ago
please, please review this one!
keesurt 1 year ago
Gun $2000
Superssor $1000
Night vision $500
GoldNCase 1 year ago
@GoldNCase missed the 600 dollar eotech and you're night vision is low. Try 1500+
Daytonaman675 1 year ago
@GoldNCase And EoTech $400
RomeoTwoSix 2 months ago
what did they mean when they were talking about the trigger being bad in bull pup weapons?
NOTobeseAMERICAN 1 year ago
@NOTobeseAMERICAN they mean its generally not vey smooth.
The only good bulpup IMO is the Microtech STG/AUG Varient
TheIronicBanana 1 year ago
@TheIronicBanana do you know why that is?
NOTobeseAMERICAN 1 year ago
@NOTobeseAMERICAN Because the placement of the trigger in relation to the rest of the gun.
TheIronicBanana 1 year ago
what is the caliber
mesquiteguy1221 1 year ago
@mesquiteguy1221 5.56
h4xor27 1 year ago
you guys are mentally retarded. it is a SUPPRESSOR, not a flash hider. suppress the soundd the sounddddd
SgtSquidy 1 year ago
He should definately try and review the FS2000 and PS90.
Outdoorsmen44 1 year ago
that supressor is not hiding the flash
1992steffan 1 year ago
@1992steffan Its not actual muzzle flash, its sparks, which makes me think its the titanium silencer.
Kylef7735 1 year ago
that doesn't suppress that well.
erikpeterson88 1 year ago
@erikpeterson88 please tell me you are joking
InfantryChans91 1 year ago
@InfantryChans91 no actually there is too much flash. go watch his video on the Yankee hill flash suppressor the noise is brought down but a suppressor is suppose to do both. its not like im expecting the flash to be gone but less than that.
erikpeterson88 1 year ago
@erikpeterson88 my bad i thought you were talking purely about the noise and was like 'what....' however it is night but suppressor's aren't my specialty
InfantryChans91 1 year ago
@InfantryChans91 yeah its cool. the ones i have shot had a little flicker of flash, but not as much as his. his has a lot for some odd reason!
erikpeterson88 1 year ago
Nope the FS2000 hits the for sale rack. Several times I pulled the trigger and got a click with no bang. No go for the FS2000 as occasionally it won't pick up the first round off the mag and without watching it go in as you can't see it load you have no way of knowing if you even have a live round. In combat you would have died. The FS2000 is a no go. Back to the AK or AR. I might try a SCAR though but I just heard one shoot and there was a distinct sound when it ran out of ammo. Hmm...
imasuper0308 1 year ago
This gun is specifically designed to use a suppressor and is almost as accurate as a top notch m-16 without one. Even with a gimpy 17" barrel! Light, compact and accurate with an amazingly quick return to zero. Its the best .223 cal. available to the public, right?
BTW im sick of everyone interchanging the word silencer for suppressor! We aren't talking about "hush puppies" here! A "silencer" for a .223 cal. rifle would be like a yard long and be the diameter of a coffee can! Forget .50 cal.!
mMAmericanSpiritMm 1 year ago
@mMAmericanSpiritMm While your point stands about their ability to dampen sound, the man who invented and patented them called them silencers.
Embarassman 1 year ago
"the sig 556 is a bit front heavy" hehe, indeed it is. I'm not entirely sure why it is but it feels like the thing has a full length bull barrel up there. Guessing the handguard is not exactly made of lightweight materials.
Zinkyness 1 year ago
lovely
javikmt 1 year ago
that sounds like an allstar...and it hasnt been reviewed for the number one reason... trigger time... the things are expensive...
vampire847 1 year ago
WOW that surpressor is bad lotsa muzzle flash
jdburt98 1 year ago
good deer killing gun
goofypothead 1 year ago
god how the hell do you get your hands on such a weapon those dam things cost as much as a car a really really nice car
kirbthe7 1 year ago
@kirbthe7 Says whom? It's around two thousand dollars. Not including the optics/silencer.
sylentmyst 1 year ago
@sylentmyst huh o rlly sum old fart did
kirbthe7 1 year ago
@kirbthe7 Yep, all of that without including the night vision was probably just over 3000 dollars, depending on manufacturer's. :D
sylentmyst 1 year ago
great sound suppression but it does absolutely nothing to suppress muzzle flash which is a pretty big deal when you're shooting at night.
119ray 1 year ago
nice :)
lolilmu 1 year ago
Dang with the scope, eotech, gun, and silencer thats like a $6000 gun
BugOutFox 1 year ago
Has this dude been on the program before?
Quartz91 1 year ago
i've shot a fs 2000 5.56 and i can tell you the trigger absolutely sucks! And the shell ejection system only causes problems... crappy design all together.
shize9ine 1 year ago
omg, just a beautiful gunnn
kintarben 1 year ago
whats with the flash out of the suppressor? Most good .223 cans hide a majority of the flash.
jarod445 1 year ago
my friends dad has one of those. pretty kick ass. no silencer however though :D
MrPurple389 1 year ago
awesome sound haha
pyramidheadthingy 1 year ago
You ever consider doing more videos for the F2000 like your other rating vids?
FatalFist 1 year ago
I always thought suppressors helped to conceal muzzle flash as well, but maybe that's just because I play too many video games.
mewarmor990 1 year ago
@mewarmor990
They can, It's just more weight for the operator to carry :( Especially when you start moving up to higher velocity rifle rounds over little pistol cartridges.
NBK160 1 year ago
a table top of this would be awsome
bf2freakXP 1 year ago
Is there any reason why you are wearing ear protection, while using a suppressor? Doesn't really seem necessary to me.
Petreat 1 year ago
Um, is there any reason why you're wearing headphones with a suppressor?
Petreat 1 year ago
Amazing suppression!
cybervore 1 year ago
its so fat and ugly XD
tandis97 1 year ago
Reformatted gun, but why still shooting 5.56 BB's?? Needs a heavier hitting round.
drogoscg1 1 year ago
@drogoscg1 5.56 is great if you use the right ammo.
voted4bush 1 year ago
@drogoscg1 Eh I want to see FN adopt the same rounds for the AK47 and fit the chamber properly to use it. But 5.56 is still pretty potent, same round M16s and M4s use while having a little bit of a lighter recoil due to their change in the operation of it's mechanics (according to FN where the gun shoots back into your shoulder rather than jumping up from the muzzle).
FatalFist 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
did he died?????
googly9volt 1 year ago
@googly9volt lmfao
TAXavier 1 year ago
@googly9volt No, but you're about to.
dotShinoda 1 year ago
@googly9volt lmfao.
erjohnson227 1 year ago
tiny round.
sgtravers 1 year ago
I cant wait to get one....
JustinTR1990 1 year ago
ppft get an AR-15 xD
shotbydalonewolf 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shotbydalonewolf
The M16/M4 is a piece of junk, it is basically an American AK-47, it is a jam-o-matic, looks ugly, and is overused and overrated.
DjLesD 1 year ago
Dj not if you know how to use one its not...
shotbydalonewolf 1 year ago 2
M16 and M4 both look great your crazy
ants00 1 year ago
But they are overused and overrated...
DjLesD 1 year ago
Duh. Its the US Army's main Assault rifle.
MacLaren594 1 year ago
not rly the ar-15 can operate after 5000 rounds and its possible it still wont jam, to keep it from jamming as much as ppl say, they just need to keep the gun lubed, thats not a pig pain in the ass if you ask me since its extremely to dissasemble and reassemble the weapon
roflstomp100 1 year ago
it is thanks for agreeing
ruskie20 1 year ago
Who cares? The M4 will be replaced by the SCAR-L and HK416 anyway.
GCVos 1 year ago
The HK416 is okay, but I don't really like the SCAR-L (Its yellow).
DjLesD 1 year ago
I don't like that color either. The Remington ACR now has that color as well. It does offer better camo though.
GCVos 1 year ago
nope. The U.S. army isn't using the SCAR-L or the HK 416 because of politcal reasons. If anything their waiting for the Bushmaster Advance Combat Rifle.
Heheh274 1 year ago
Eeeh no. Remington produces the ACR and it's the Adaptive Combate Rifle. The SCAR and HK416 are already in use by the US Army.
GCVos 1 year ago
yeah but the US army is really using the HK 416 and SCAR in mass numbers. If they end up getting HK 416s and SCARs the money is going to end up going to Europe and it wont circulate in the U.S.
Everything seems to be affected by politics now a days. lol
Heheh274 1 year ago
You do know FN Herstal has a USA branch right? The SCAR is manufactured in the States, not in Belgium. FN Belgium mostly produces the P90 and F2000 but apart from that, as far as I know, they are only involved in weapons design, not production. Pretty much the same goes for H&K. The HK416 (as far as I know) is produced in the USA. The main assault rifle produced in Germany is the G36.
GCVos 1 year ago
Yeah well some of that money still goes to Belgium or Germany cause it is still a Belgium or German company even though it has a USA branch.
Heheh274 1 year ago
Yes, that's true. Apart from those rifles though, there aren't any other rifles that have been positively tested by the US Army. The ACR has just gone into production but I think it's highly unlikely for that rifle to make it into the USMC or other department. The ACR will probably be used by private security contractors, but it's too expensive for the US Army. The FN SCAR is relatively cheap.
GCVos 1 year ago
Than shouldn't we use the improved 6.8mm M4 variants? it would be way cheaper and would be proven because its an m4
Heheh274 1 year ago
Do you mean rifles like the REC7? The 6.8mm round isn't a NATO round so I don't think it'll be used by any army any time soon.
GCVos 1 year ago
cheaper? So you think buying conversion kits for thousands of m4/m16s AND replacing massive stockpiles of 5.56 with the more expensive 6.8 round would be cheaper?
Konaboy7 1 year ago
no im not saying conversion kits. Just improve the fucken m4s and stop being dumb asses. DO you have an idea of how much the ACR costs?
Heheh274 1 year ago
You are totally right !!
Daruli2004 1 year ago
@GCVos The initial SCARs were produced in Belgium, not the USA. And yes, FN Herstal also manufactures the weapons, it's mostly it's civilian rifles and the SCAR + M249 SAW that are made in the US because that's their main market. They do have many more products than just the SCAR, you know.
Synthiotics 1 year ago
didn't you just say the army wasnt using either? stop googling and arguing at the same time
Konaboy7 1 year ago
btw i meant isnt not is.
My mistake
Heheh274 1 year ago
@Heheh274 well the army does not use SCAR. the rangers and seals use it and the marines are trying to get it. a few guys in the army use the 416 though
WhatsaUserName321 1 year ago
That is a very sweet setup right there.
Outdoorsmen44 1 year ago
This is one yummy firearm.
Pandanobear 2 years ago 2
I agree the suppressor does let out quite a bit of muzzle flash. I think it looks sweet though when he has the camera light off and you see the muzzle flash.
xpl0i7z 2 years ago
Why didnt Nutn review the FS 2000 yet?
Raccoonraper 2 years ago 59
@Raccoonraper nutn doesnt review anything that is not an ar-15 type rifle....
nunvikingsofthesea 1 year ago
@nunvikingsofthesea Yea, except for AKs, mini 14s, Kel tecs, various .22s, and M1As. If he can't spend alot of time with the rifle he can't review it. So don't run your suck about things you don't know.
Blacklung27 1 year ago 10
i dont like the silencer it doesnt hide the muzzle flash but the sound is good
xWHOPPERxJRx 2 years ago 36
@xWHOPPERxJRx -its a suppressor, not a flash hider.
Hispeed1 1 year ago 18
@Hispeed1 lol suppressors are suppose to get rid of all of that flash lol
FunGunsJared 1 year ago
@Hispeed1 ok really so flash hiders dont lower the decible out out
tron72mon 9 months ago
@xWHOPPERxJRx Because they're shooting at night =] you ever see fireworks or firecrackers in the day? Can't put a silencers on those heheh...
intrugens 1 year ago
@xWHOPPERxJRx kinda like those fake hollywoof suppressors huh?
killermod0 1 year ago
@xWHOPPERxJRx yeah i thought all silencers do flash hide too, maybe cause im new to this game
philly624 1 year ago
@xWHOPPERxJRx its hiding the muzzle flash what you're seeing is the gasport venting.
Daytonaman675 1 year ago
is that really silent?
amEricaneurOstar 2 years ago
a LOT more than without silencer
Sevival 2 years ago
it can never be completly silent
TaeIeon 2 years ago
@amEricaneurOstar its the sound of a whip compared to pop pop pop...
racingisfun 2 years ago
as good as it will get with that suppressor, and super mega nice expensive ones wont get that much better
elvishboyman 2 years ago
supressors can't get rid of all of the sound because the bullets are traveling at supersonic speeds than creating sonic booms. you can't do anything about that with out changing the round making it below supersonic speeds.
GunFreak270 2 years ago
witch would make a gun ultimatly useless. right?
XDMWeaponCollector 2 years ago
not really. it get's rid of enough sound to obscure your position.
GunFreak270 2 years ago
Not to mention theres a different between suppressors and silencers. suppressor is really just to hide the flash and obscure your possition. Silencers are to get rid of the sound as much as possible. Though if your not using sub sonic ammo then the silencer will work more like a suppressor.
obeyance 2 years ago
And the actual action is pretty loud by itself.
Hitari0 1 year ago
yeah lol. AK-47's actions are like louder than the boom! XD
GunFreak270 1 year ago
im pretty surprised it has that much muzzle flash suppressed my can has no flash whats so ever
ozzyroth 2 years ago
I'd love to have a gun like that in my gun cabinet (well, ok, I'd like to every gun ever made and to be made in history in my gun cabinet, but life just ain't fair isn't it? ). Since we're on the subject of bullpumps, I'd like to know more about the FN FS 2000 and the Kel-Tec RFB. Also I hear mixed reviews on the reliability and durability of bullpumps (example, I hear the L85A1/A2 is a piece of crap in that category).
Rektek23 2 years ago
you mean bullpups, not bullpumps...
Weirdologist 2 years ago
I'd love to have one of these little rifles. I've held one and loved the way it sat in my shoulder, perfect for shorter shooters like me.
Goodspittin 2 years ago
@nutnfancy, why do you not like bullpup triggers? i've never shot one. im hoping for an explanation as to why the trigger isn't as good as you'd like.
humanentropy 2 years ago
All bullup triggers suck, i use to shoot a hell load with AUG and i got to play around with Tavor (worst of all the bullup triggers i have ever held). The triggers are usually quite hard because the ''trigger assembly'' has to stretch from where the trigger is all the way to the back of the mag where the firing mechanism is. This metal is not rigid and makes slight bends, good example is like pushing a stiff flat wire against a wall or something.
TomsGuns 2 years ago
have you tried the KEL-TEC RFB Bullpup? it shoots .308 Win. I understand that the trigger assembly would be around as crappy as all other bull pups. I don't know if the AK receiver similarities type would make a difference. Thanks for the info, TomsGuns!
humanentropy 2 years ago
Mr Nutnfancy, the Kel-Tec RFB bullpup is supposed to have a nice trigger on it, I think they have just recently gotten it into production. From what I hear the demand is still outpacing the production by quite a bit.
thegangvault2 2 years ago
what ammo are you using?
TomsGuns 2 years ago
5.56 I think....
KnoxSUX 2 years ago
i meant if they were subsonics...
TomsGuns 2 years ago
i wonder if there are foregrips for it
reallysecretusername 2 years ago
there are foregrips yes
krm4c4 2 years ago
wow....whisper quiet
cuzimaluzer77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its battle rifle from halo 2 and 3
irkiIIer 2 years ago
its obvz not! stop jackin off over halo
BRKmaddox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what's so bad about a bullpup trigger?
MelleB90 2 years ago
its obviously a silencer not a suppressor since the flame is so visible
deedeedee1234321 2 years ago
the suppressor is so shit, it shows the flame or sparks it looks like whenever he fires
1nonlyLuigi 2 years ago
zomg.
josejalipano 2 years ago
me?
zomgbbqwth 2 years ago
Splinter Cell style.
ele90 2 years ago
why is that gun so big???
SGCDriver 2 years ago
its not that big the supressor just makes it look longer
darkshadowscene 2 years ago
I just hope FN takes the F2000 concept and updates it a little. Like they said, tightens the groupings so you can auto for longer periods of time and not worry about the doom that is "spray and pray".
FatalFist 2 years ago
Splinter Cell hahaha
fredjustsucks 2 years ago
how much do these cost
reaper042196 2 years ago
pretty expensive
superultramegaman5 2 years ago
yeh but from x amount to x amount of money
reaper042196 2 years ago
i've heard about $1,500 to just under $2,000. not quite sure though
superultramegaman5 2 years ago
Nutn thinks it was around $2000-- Veri (Nutn's sister)
nutnfancy 2 years ago
i heard this gun has a heavy recoil, is that true? because in the video it doesent see to have a recoill that big
terrateB 2 years ago
A lot.
BrianTotse 2 years ago
More than you can afford...Haha nah, its around 1500 without the stuff he has on it. Fully loaded like that dude's gun..Im guessing..3500-4k. I might be horribly wrong.
romanosalvatore 2 years ago
$2200 gun + ($600+$200 tax) suppressor + $500 eotech + $4000 nvg[discontinued]* so $7500? fairly spit-bally but still f-ing expensive
TheILLUSIONIST93 2 years ago 2
Yeah, wayyyyyyyy beyond my budget.
romanosalvatore 2 years ago
k thanks
reaper042196 2 years ago
Spend more time researching on how laws actually are, you must....
juki009 2 years ago
I was interested in gun control laws around the world at one point.i was under the impression that most of europe had restrictive laws like the UK.that is actually NOT the case, handguns and semi auto rifles are legal in most european countries there are some restrictions on
military ammo and magazine capacity in SOME nations, however almost all have required licensing and registration since the post ww2 period and this has led to confiscation ONLY in britian. and australia
not new zealand
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
hmmm, I am not sure on the registration thing.
On one hand, it can promote responsible use of guns because the use of the weapon can be traced back to your. On the other hand,t it can open up an avenue of abuse as the list of registered can be used for confiscation. The fact the confiscation CAN and HAS occured means that it WILL happen in the future.
juki009 2 years ago
this is my point gun control opponent insist registration ALWAYS leads to confiscation, and this is not so. massachusetts has required registration as has new york , switzerland gemany france sweden, look if they want you gun that bad and things get that bad they will just go house to house, my point is there are countries many coutries that have had registration since the post ww2 period that have NOT confiscated
and the plus is people are very reluctant to do somethig illegal or rash
with a
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
i have a family member who is fairly "left"
(you can them liberals in america which is confusing in europe the term liberal has a meaning closer to the old classical liberal definition as opposed to your definition which means social liberal social democrat or SOCIALIST?)
AND WHEN I ASKED HER HOW SAFE
a natio nthat has baned guns was she shrugged and said
"well there are a sh%tload of stabbings you read about so its not paradice"
itoronto for example is safer than any american city
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
to make a long story shorter i see licensing and registration as a logical ballance between the rights of gun owners and those in society who feel
guns are a threat to public order
my feeling is properly regulated(devil is always in the details) guns dont have to be any more of a threat than an automobile,BUT in order to drive a car you must have a license and your automoble must be registered
resepctfully THE WILLiamMCALE
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
Still has some flash despite the suppressor, is it noticeable while firing?
juki009 2 years ago
there is a certain irony in the fact that some of the best weapons in world are made by belgians, christ they make waffels chocolate truffels they cant make up their minds if they speak dutch or french but dammit they can makes guns
hats off to them
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago
@TheWilliamcale Does not exactly surprise me...Dr. Evil was raised by Belgians and look how he turned out!
juki009 2 years ago 2
perfect comment
TheWilliamcale 2 years ago