he is right of course...100 billion stars each with about 8 planets....that's 800 billion planets in our galaxy the Milky Way...that's 1 galaxy in the midst of trillions...however it seems that nature made the distance between stars to be vast so as to have no relationship between any two solar systems...he wants us separate from other worlds..
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
I'm with 'Dgamer21': Kubrick is the most brilliant moviegoer who ever vowed to make better films than the B-movies he grew up watching. I just saw for the first time since 1968 a 70mm print of "2001" screened at Seattle's Cinerama Theatre, and noticed for the first time that the orbiting nuclear weapons platform from the famous 'match-cut' has a French air force roundel painted on its side!
@Eneru89 aww, did the poor Kubrick fanboy get all upset and sniffly? Fact is there are at least 30 directors i could name off the top of my head that are CLEARLY better than Kubrick, and most people that know cinema existed before the 70's feel the same.
@Idattani well do youknow who is Carlo Verdone?No i think youdon't. Making a film is likewriting a book,it can becomplex and artistically sublime,but if itdoesn't excite you, or teach you nothing orsimply doesn't makeyou happy,that'snotagoodmovie.
The fact that youcame onYouTube tosay that Kubrick is crap,tells us thatKubrick hits you.Sodon't be immature,eachdirector is great,but not all hit the same way.I cannot have seen every film evermade, but that doesn'tmeanthat thosewholikeKubrickarejerk.
@Idattani Lol you are playing the " better than" game where art is concerned? go home and read your donald duck comics little boy ,come back when you have grown up... considerably.
@jsilence418 Yep just like i thought, you can't dispute that either of those directors i listed are better than the overrated Kubrick. Go home and watch Godard little boy, come back when you have seen TRUE ART, not pretentiousness masquerading as art.
@Idattani I just did dipute it stupid lol and you lost! too ashamed to come up with a good response? go home and watch your tarantino films like a good loser.
@jsilence418 You didn't dispute it any way, you simply resorted to petulant slurs like most Kubrick-geeks do when backed into a corner. Tarantino? I would think someone like you who thinks Stanley K is the quintessence of good art and taste would be more inclined to gravitate toward Tarantino being that his work is seeping with an almost equal amount of pretentiousness.
@Idattani Correct I have never seen an Ozu film. If I had, I have no doubt I would pick up all his idiosyncrasies. while you were picking up pop corn! you on the other hand could not nor have sat through any Svanmajer film!
@jsilence418 hahahaha I knew it, just proves my point that Kubrick-geeks have never even experienced true art on the level of Ozu but think they have divine right to anoint Kubrick as best director that ever lived, while continuing to be blissfully ignorant of the true masters of the craft!
@Idattani You can try and be a film hipster all you want. Throwing out obscure names here and there to try and prove your 'intelligence'. You say Kubrick is pretentious? YOU are pretentious.
Also just a footnote: Kubrick ISN'T pretentious, he is a true cinematic artist and just because he's well known it does not diminish that. His films are warm but can be exuberantly chilling and they sit in the brain long after the initial viewing.
@StrawberryJungle How are those names even obscure? The point i am making is that it is complete ignorance for people to assert Kubrick as the head honcho of filmmaking when they haven't even seen or studied the work of such essential directors as Ozu, Bresson or Godard to name just a few.
@Idattani Can you not just accept that film is subjective? You think you're right about him not being the best film maker but perhaps his films just don't appeal to you as much as Ozu, Bresson or Godard's. To someone else, Kubrick's films may completely resonate with them or they may find his style particularly beautiful or moving. Also, how do you know that Kubrick fans haven't studied these other directors? It's very ignorant of you to assume that they haven't.
Seeing this black and white footage with hissy audio just reinforces for me what an incredible feat, both directorially and technologically, 2001: A Space Odyssey was. So many futuristic movies look embarrassingly dated within ten years of their release.
He's not one of the greats yet, But he's the best person currently. 2001 and full metal jacket are my favourite movies, Im only 13 and when I try to show my friends these movies they do not get it, at all. I feel alone lol. Personally I like darryn more then lynch, but that's just me. A film that I recommend you seeing is the film 'MOON'. Sam rockwell.
certainly the most epic director of all time. He made about ten films, all completely different from one another. 2001 is a sci fi, Dr strangelove dark comedy, paths of glory war epic, lolita, and then there a clockwork orange which i cant even describe. the only other director i would say is over him is Ingmar Bergman.
@ThaSubzstance i can see u know what ur talking about, but to be honest, they are two completely different filmmakers. although bergman has around 50 films, at least 40 of them are masterpieces, in their own way. this is a stanley kubrick page tho so ill shut up lol. rip kubrick.
@Therealtaxidriver where did you get that from? I'm familiar with Hunter S Thompson and Roman Polanski being associated with those things, but not Kubrick. Where are you getting that, I want to look it up. Thanks
Scientists know now that there are about a hundred billion stars in our galaxy, and about a hundred billion galaxies in the visible universe. The point is that there are so many stars in the visible universe, that the likely hood of life, evolving around them even if the possibilities where one in a million then there would be hundreds of millions of worlds in the universe.
Make anyone wonder how someone was able to get away with impersonating Stanley Kubrick he was reclusive a stereotyped sign of genius and that the guy who did didn't even look like him!
I'm not sure what convinces me most that Kubrick was a genius...the fact he made such awesome films or the fact he shunned the media and avoided interviews...both show amazing wisdom and intelligence. His family and friends seem to be such warm, charming, down to Earth people, I'm not surprised he chose to be with them and avoid the spotlight of the typical media star. He's an example to the rest of his industry.
Man, i wish i could of been on a set with him, just to see how great he was.
Anyway, i made my first film :) pretty excited but i need feedback from you guys so please go to my channel and critique. Thanks (i dont care if its positive or negative) thanks
I grew up with his movies (2001,A Clockwork Orange,Barry Lyndon,The Shining,FMJ and Eyes Wide Shut) and i've never felt again the way i felt expecting a new Kubrick movie.
@Fjord76 There's been news about adapting one of his long forgotten screenplays, Lunatic At Large, into a feature film in this year ot next year!!! :D
@PrototypeAndroid Good for you! But as you know, intelligence is wasted on the apathetic who are inclined to use their intelligence to beget yet more apathy.
Now, if someone says, "humanity has a LOT to learn," wonderful. But that's not in any way the same snide spirit as, "show me some intelligent life on Earth."
Yes, we have a great many troubles. Less grumbling; more contemplation, and repair.
@PrototypeAndroid Yes, a self-defeatist stromng point. Laziness and irresponsibility beget apathy. There are a great many intelligent people, and NONE make such apathetic comments.
Muck in and get a say, or opt out and say nothing.
@TheSpiritof1969 perhaps u should read up a bit, it wasnt "a massive success". as much as i like the movie, it got mixed reviews from lots of critics and audiences, the main reason being that it was "BORING". just sayin'.
No its was not boring but the problem was that many people did not understand the plot. It was beautifully made and like no other sci-fi before it. I left the cinama and had to read the book to work it out. Remember the story continued with two more films of the books that followed.
How true his words are ! Are the only life in the Cosmos ?? Out of 100 billion stars ? Oot of 100 billion galaxies ?? NOT likely !! Perhaps the god-like aliens see us a "mostly harmless".. :D ;)
@marcparella even if we travel at the speed of light the time taken to reach the nearest star (Alpha Centuri) is 4.3 years and to return add 4.3 to it making it 8.6 years to know what is really happening on out nearest star. With our current technology we can travel at about 16Ma i.e, 0.000041 the speed of light so, even if we use all our resources it takes about 11,000 years to just reach the star and another 11,000 to return. Like a man on a canoe in Indian Ocean trying to find life in America
Kubrick was a master filmmaker. He overestimated the rate at which humanity would advance, but 2001 A Space Oddysey will prove to be an accurate depiction of the future of space travel in due time.
That said, it's time for humans to return to the moon!
@hughpower123 I agree. Poverty will never end and we're just making the problem worse by giving people food and not teaching responsibility. We should focus on the stars. It's the only way to ensure our survival as a species.
@hughpower123 I disagree, I think if the human race were less concerned with Religion, declaring war on homosexuals, preaching lies and denying intelligence life exists, we could living on mars. Yes poverty may yet exist regardless, but that doesn't mean we should not take care of our race as well.
@ptraiders40 He didn't write 2001, its was a book beforehand, he only turned it in to a movie, it wasn't his belief that by year 2001 that would have all happened.
@meezocool No, he loosely based it off Arthur C. Clarke's short story: The Sentinel, and he collaborated with Clarke to make the movie, and Clarke rewrote the short story into a novel of the movie.
From Thus Spoke Zarathustra... "Innocence is the child, and forgetfulness, a new beginning, a game, a self- rolling wheel, a first movement, a holy Yea. Aye, for the game of creating, my brethren, there is needed a holy Yea unto life: ITS OWN will, willeth now the spirit; HIS OWN world winneth the world's outcast. Three metamorphoses of the spirit have I designated to you: how the spirit became a camel, the camel a lion, and the lion at last a child.
The most startling thing about Kubrick and his description of what 2001 was about, and what we know today, in 2010, is that it shows how prescient Stanley Kubrick actually was.
Excellent video to an outstanding, groundbreaking film.
I came here to inform those who adore this great movie that an amateur youtube film critic named confusedmatthew has done an incredibly fallacious and misguided review of this film and I invite you all to view his cringeworthy efforts and perhaps challenge his laughably weak criticism.
Stanley and Orson Welles are my two favorite filmmakers. They didn't see the ordinary, they saw the future of filmmaking as extraordinary beyond the human eye. Is just amazing how they saw behind the camera in a different way. Just amazing.
Just finished watching this film for the fourth time, and still find it a piece of shit. Bergman may have been depressive, but at least he had an intent, but Kubrick's work seems to be just a vanity project.
@UltimateSerge Look it this way: 2001 A Space Odyssey is a journey, as it is a journey for you. If you wanted answers... that was beyond Kubrick and Clark. Just a journey... a great one indeed.
@UltimateSerge It's Darwinian logic meets the next frontier. The starchild is man's transcending into a whole new realm of thought and achievement. Can man overcome reliance on computers? The bout with HAL tackles man vs artificial intelligence. The black slab appears due to other higher lifeforms working to bring man to these higher callings. Which is why shortly after you see the cavemen touch it, they discover the advantages of using weapons.
@BryterJonas I guess my problem with it is that its an excessive implicit experience. Watch Bunuel's Viridiana and you have to infer certain things. But 2001 is entirely an implicit experience. In ways it seems overly suggestive without establishing a grounding.
@Jackofall2345 yeah i saw some of his films when i was thirteen, the shining, and a clockwork orange, he was so brilliant. but i want to work in the film industry soon but i am only 15
@Jackofall2345 i watched 2001 when i was 13 and i loved it, but that was because i was really into films and i loved stanley krubrick. i showed it to my 17 year old stepbrother and he hated it
i don't think this movie has anything to do with aliens but with us humans..he just used that at those times for a hype... c clark lives on Ceylon or did and a lot in this movie has to do with philosophy coming from indian and Buddhist religions..
@OrangeOceanOctopus Yep. I'll second that.I enjoy some of his movies and he is unique, but let's face it: Barry Lyndon is unwatchable and Eyes Wide Shut was an annoying effort.I guess it's also down to the actors: Ryan O'Neal and Tom Cruise? Give me a break....I guess 2001 was a very interesting movie,but the main actor was terrible...So yeah,let's judge him realistically and cut the crap.
Kubrick, Leone, Hitchcock. Those 3 make my Mt. Rushmore of directors. I'll leave one spot open, maybe throw Polanski in there, Spielberg. Kubrick is the most creative though I think.
Where is he in the last frame of this clip with that girl with the black hair with the fringe or bangs?...also...Kubrick doesn't really look like he was telling the truth as to what he really thinks in this clip...it was a different time back then...so who knows...maybe he did sell his soul to the devil...
@zackhanscom Since when does getting good grades and going to college qualify someone as a genius? What someone does with their career is the real acid test. Einstein and Tesla were known for doing poorly in school as well in their youth.
You know... I always imagined Kubrick as having this booming voice. It's weird... I guess it's just the impression I got from his movies, that he was some force of nature. Oh well... he's still awesome and "2001: A Space Odyssey" is easily my favorite of his films.
he is right of course...100 billion stars each with about 8 planets....that's 800 billion planets in our galaxy the Milky Way...that's 1 galaxy in the midst of trillions...however it seems that nature made the distance between stars to be vast so as to have no relationship between any two solar systems...he wants us separate from other worlds..
johnediamond 1 month ago
is this the only videotaped iv of kubrich?
faridjabba 1 month ago in playlist film
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 2 months ago
I'm with 'Dgamer21': Kubrick is the most brilliant moviegoer who ever vowed to make better films than the B-movies he grew up watching. I just saw for the first time since 1968 a 70mm print of "2001" screened at Seattle's Cinerama Theatre, and noticed for the first time that the orbiting nuclear weapons platform from the famous 'match-cut' has a French air force roundel painted on its side!
scorpiowatertiger 3 months ago
Robert Bresson >>> Kubrick
Ozu >>> Kubrick
Ford >>> Kubrick
Lubitsch >>> Kubrick
Welles >>> Kubrick
need i go on?
Idattani 4 months ago
@Idattani no please we understand you suck
Eneru89 3 months ago
@Eneru89 aww, did the poor Kubrick fanboy get all upset and sniffly? Fact is there are at least 30 directors i could name off the top of my head that are CLEARLY better than Kubrick, and most people that know cinema existed before the 70's feel the same.
Idattani 3 months ago
@Idattani well do youknow who is Carlo Verdone?No i think youdon't. Making a film is likewriting a book,it can becomplex and artistically sublime,but if itdoesn't excite you, or teach you nothing orsimply doesn't makeyou happy,that'snotagoodmovie.
The fact that youcame onYouTube tosay that Kubrick is crap,tells us thatKubrick hits you.Sodon't be immature,eachdirector is great,but not all hit the same way.I cannot have seen every film evermade, but that doesn'tmeanthat thosewholikeKubrickarejerk.
Eneru89 3 months ago
@Idattani Lol you are playing the " better than" game where art is concerned? go home and read your donald duck comics little boy ,come back when you have grown up... considerably.
jsilence418 1 month ago
@jsilence418 Yep just like i thought, you can't dispute that either of those directors i listed are better than the overrated Kubrick. Go home and watch Godard little boy, come back when you have seen TRUE ART, not pretentiousness masquerading as art.
Idattani 1 month ago
@Idattani I just did dipute it stupid lol and you lost! too ashamed to come up with a good response? go home and watch your tarantino films like a good loser.
jsilence418 1 month ago
@jsilence418 You didn't dispute it any way, you simply resorted to petulant slurs like most Kubrick-geeks do when backed into a corner. Tarantino? I would think someone like you who thinks Stanley K is the quintessence of good art and taste would be more inclined to gravitate toward Tarantino being that his work is seeping with an almost equal amount of pretentiousness.
ROFL. Bet you have never seen an Ozu film.
Idattani 1 month ago
@Idattani Correct I have never seen an Ozu film. If I had, I have no doubt I would pick up all his idiosyncrasies. while you were picking up pop corn! you on the other hand could not nor have sat through any Svanmajer film!
jsilence418 1 month ago
@jsilence418 hahahaha I knew it, just proves my point that Kubrick-geeks have never even experienced true art on the level of Ozu but think they have divine right to anoint Kubrick as best director that ever lived, while continuing to be blissfully ignorant of the true masters of the craft!
Idattani 1 month ago
@Idattani You can try and be a film hipster all you want. Throwing out obscure names here and there to try and prove your 'intelligence'. You say Kubrick is pretentious? YOU are pretentious.
Also just a footnote: Kubrick ISN'T pretentious, he is a true cinematic artist and just because he's well known it does not diminish that. His films are warm but can be exuberantly chilling and they sit in the brain long after the initial viewing.
StrawberryJungle 1 month ago
@StrawberryJungle How are those names even obscure? The point i am making is that it is complete ignorance for people to assert Kubrick as the head honcho of filmmaking when they haven't even seen or studied the work of such essential directors as Ozu, Bresson or Godard to name just a few.
Idattani 1 month ago
@Idattani Can you not just accept that film is subjective? You think you're right about him not being the best film maker but perhaps his films just don't appeal to you as much as Ozu, Bresson or Godard's. To someone else, Kubrick's films may completely resonate with them or they may find his style particularly beautiful or moving. Also, how do you know that Kubrick fans haven't studied these other directors? It's very ignorant of you to assume that they haven't.
StrawberryJungle 1 month ago
Comment removed
IRobertMarah 3 days ago
Oh man, I love his voice!
FetaCheese222 4 months ago
The only problem with Kubrick is that he should have made more films.
JFishFilm 4 months ago
That's Kubrick ?
I met him 2 years after he died and he looked a lot different.
TacomaPaul 5 months ago
@TacomaPaul you met him two years after he died?
jp19ambrk 5 months ago
@TacomaPaul Okay crazy man.
FetaCheese222 4 months ago
I expectet him to have a deeper voice.
BehnamLot 5 months ago
Mindblower...
and he says it in such a matter-of-fact way.
FappyChilmore 5 months ago
Der Meister spricht..
Raschpreis 5 months ago
@Hoppus217 pm me your contact information
beanhouse55 5 months ago
@Hoppus217 feed me!
beanhouse55 5 months ago
Seeing this black and white footage with hissy audio just reinforces for me what an incredible feat, both directorially and technologically, 2001: A Space Odyssey was. So many futuristic movies look embarrassingly dated within ten years of their release.
Valelacerte 5 months ago
@Hoppus217 faggot
beanhouse55 6 months ago
@Hoppus217 I trust darryn, because each movie get's better every time
poopamultimatepoopy 6 months ago
He's not one of the greats yet, But he's the best person currently. 2001 and full metal jacket are my favourite movies, Im only 13 and when I try to show my friends these movies they do not get it, at all. I feel alone lol. Personally I like darryn more then lynch, but that's just me. A film that I recommend you seeing is the film 'MOON'. Sam rockwell.
poopamultimatepoopy 6 months ago
@Hoppus217 Darren aranofski?
poopamultimatepoopy 6 months ago
Jackson king of pop, Kubrick king of cinema.
saqibk1 6 months ago
Is that Swedish?
FractalBolt 6 months ago
oh yah and therealtaxidriver...........kill urself.
ThaSubzstance 6 months ago
certainly the most epic director of all time. He made about ten films, all completely different from one another. 2001 is a sci fi, Dr strangelove dark comedy, paths of glory war epic, lolita, and then there a clockwork orange which i cant even describe. the only other director i would say is over him is Ingmar Bergman.
ThaSubzstance 6 months ago
@ThaSubzstance Bergman is visionary, but sloppy...he made over 60 films...Kubrick made 10 and are all brilliant, precise, accurate.
MRLoQual 6 months ago
@ThaSubzstance i can see u know what ur talking about, but to be honest, they are two completely different filmmakers. although bergman has around 50 films, at least 40 of them are masterpieces, in their own way. this is a stanley kubrick page tho so ill shut up lol. rip kubrick.
ThaSubzstance 6 months ago
the most important artist of the last 100 years
fleamarket3000 6 months ago
@fleamarket3000 You are valid in your observations
GregSidelnikov 6 months ago
If you can't look it up in a book, then it didn't happen. Right Mr. Mason?
Therealtaxidriver 6 months ago
Comment removed
Therealtaxidriver 7 months ago
StanleyKu: Here's some haiku... Fuk-U!
Therealtaxidriver 7 months ago
I bet he would have liked Curb Your Enthusiasm.
StanleyKu 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StanleyKu Yea because it's all about neurotic Jew Rats who shit in their own beds.
Therealtaxidriver 7 months ago
Comment removed
bobyo4 6 months ago
the dude was talented no doubt about it.
usaeagle1776 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He looks like a terrorist and ugly. Definitely, he's a Jew :)
VideoUploaderTester 8 months ago
Comment removed
straker2 8 months ago
@straker2 So you said that Jews are not broadminded, not free-thinker, but prejudicial? Undoubtedly you must be a kike :)
VideoUploaderTester 8 months ago
Comment removed
straker2 8 months ago
@straker2 Jews are ugly :)
VideoUploaderTester 8 months ago
Comment removed
mjpers1 8 months ago
I'm just going to put this blunt and simple: Stanley Kubrick is the greatest director who ever lived. Period.
Dgamer21 9 months ago 75
@Dgamer21 I could not agree more.
Stiny114 9 months ago
@Dgamer21 Yes.
jgrannell1 8 months ago
@Dgamer21 Agree with you 100%, Kubrick was the first and possibly last great director, the rest were slackers by comparison.
straker2 8 months ago
@Dgamer21 The greatest director of child rapist snuff films.
Therealtaxidriver 7 months ago
@Therealtaxidriver where did you get that from? I'm familiar with Hunter S Thompson and Roman Polanski being associated with those things, but not Kubrick. Where are you getting that, I want to look it up. Thanks
ATENakaATON 6 months ago
@Dgamer21 Bullocks
Therealtaxidriver 6 months ago
@Dgamer21 what do you think about Chris Nolan?
dabangginception 5 months ago
@dabangginception He's pretty good. But I don't anything else he's directed besides Inception and the batman movies.
Dgamer21 5 months ago
Comment removed
Blueboyzero1 3 months ago
Comment removed
Blueboyzero1 3 months ago
Cara, o cara mandava muito bem cara
namagaderas 9 months ago
0:19- The Eyebrow.
XXmissybooXX 9 months ago
What a genius he was. After Kubrick, we lost Frankenheimer, Altman, and Bergman, just to name a few. We'll never see films like theirs again.
mjpers1 9 months ago
@mjpers1 Frankenheimer????? Hopefully we won't see the like of him again. We are talking Kubrick here, so lets have a bit of respect.
MELOCOTON35 8 months ago
@MELOCOTON35 Ever seen The Train, Seconds, The Manchurian Candidate ?
mjpers1 8 months ago
@mjpers1
MELOCOTON35 8 months ago
Scientists know now that there are about a hundred billion stars in our galaxy, and about a hundred billion galaxies in the visible universe. The point is that there are so many stars in the visible universe, that the likely hood of life, evolving around them even if the possibilities where one in a million then there would be hundreds of millions of worlds in the universe.
FrenchyDuckbill 9 months ago
lol... they translated "galaxy" as "solar system" in the Dutch subtitles. "There are a hundred billion stars in our solar system". Yeah... morons :)
photek1944 10 months ago
Make anyone wonder how someone was able to get away with impersonating Stanley Kubrick he was reclusive a stereotyped sign of genius and that the guy who did didn't even look like him!
seth5220 10 months ago
Simply the best director ! RIP Kubrick
immortalperser 10 months ago 2
I'm not sure what convinces me most that Kubrick was a genius...the fact he made such awesome films or the fact he shunned the media and avoided interviews...both show amazing wisdom and intelligence. His family and friends seem to be such warm, charming, down to Earth people, I'm not surprised he chose to be with them and avoid the spotlight of the typical media star. He's an example to the rest of his industry.
straker2 10 months ago 2
thank god for this man...the most important artist of the last 50 years IMO
220friend 11 months ago 2
>2001
>Story
Cool story, Kubrick.
NinjaJedi 11 months ago
Man, i wish i could of been on a set with him, just to see how great he was.
Anyway, i made my first film :) pretty excited but i need feedback from you guys so please go to my channel and critique. Thanks (i dont care if its positive or negative) thanks
JustinIsMakingFilms 11 months ago
Most clever man in the movie industry E-VER.
I grew up with his movies (2001,A Clockwork Orange,Barry Lyndon,The Shining,FMJ and Eyes Wide Shut) and i've never felt again the way i felt expecting a new Kubrick movie.
Fjord76 1 year ago 2
@Fjord76 There's been news about adapting one of his long forgotten screenplays, Lunatic At Large, into a feature film in this year ot next year!!! :D
MproductionsMovies 11 months ago
@PrototypeAndroid Good for you! But as you know, intelligence is wasted on the apathetic who are inclined to use their intelligence to beget yet more apathy.
Now, if someone says, "humanity has a LOT to learn," wonderful. But that's not in any way the same snide spirit as, "show me some intelligent life on Earth."
Yes, we have a great many troubles. Less grumbling; more contemplation, and repair.
El135o 1 year ago 2
@El135o No worry. We'll make things better yet! Once we get bored of our cell phones.
El135o 1 year ago
@El135o Dude, he was fucking joking! You're the one who's a fucking pessimist.
ryanmshepard92 11 months ago
@PrototypeAndroid Yes, a self-defeatist stromng point. Laziness and irresponsibility beget apathy. There are a great many intelligent people, and NONE make such apathetic comments.
Muck in and get a say, or opt out and say nothing.
El135o 1 year ago
@PrototypeAndroid I think it's irresponsible and lazy. Pessimists are no better than optimists. Realists do all the work.
El135o 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn i wish i had been here to see it on opening day! lol
TheAltair4 1 year ago
i feel a lot of ppl walked out of that premiere dissapointed...and for that I pity Kubrick cuz they gave up too easily on him
kudjo24 1 year ago
@kudjo24
Are you kidding? It was a massive success.
TheSpiritof1969 1 year ago
@TheSpiritof1969 perhaps u should read up a bit, it wasnt "a massive success". as much as i like the movie, it got mixed reviews from lots of critics and audiences, the main reason being that it was "BORING". just sayin'.
kudjo24 1 year ago
@kudjo24
No its was not boring but the problem was that many people did not understand the plot. It was beautifully made and like no other sci-fi before it. I left the cinama and had to read the book to work it out. Remember the story continued with two more films of the books that followed.
TheSpiritof1969 1 year ago
I really wish we could have seen what Kubrick would've done with the Avatar technology,
I'm not saying Avatar was wrong for that tech. I'm saying that it's a shame we didn't get to see more of Kubrick's imagination.
LukeLovesRose 1 year ago
@bassbait the education system in America did fail to notice his genius...
Richdude1983 1 year ago
How true his words are ! Are the only life in the Cosmos ?? Out of 100 billion stars ? Oot of 100 billion galaxies ?? NOT likely !! Perhaps the god-like aliens see us a "mostly harmless".. :D ;)
davisgreen2020 1 year ago
This man should've won an Oscar!!!
1944ACE1944 1 year ago
@1944ACE1944 I think he won the d w griffith award though...
DeadlyVeggie 1 year ago
@1944ACE1944 i agree, but the academy doesn't like true "art" ;)
devianaut 1 year ago
@1944ACE1944 He did.
henrytod 1 year ago
0:52
...bruno mars??
JessikahAznBabyy 1 year ago
His movies are in colour bit his interviews arent. Strange...
CAPSL0CKeD 1 year ago
@CAPSL0CKeD or should you say, strangeman
tk5800 1 year ago
probably the only jew worth listening to
TheOreoGuru 1 year ago
he is my favorite jew
goblue122394 1 year ago
@goblue122394 He was born a New York Jew but lived his life as an atheist!
And A Very Evil Atheist At That, Mr. Go blue.
Therealtaxidriver 1 year ago
Ok, so when will scientists finally discover intelligent life here on Earth? I think that is the more pressing issue.
marcparella 1 year ago 69
@marcparella
Greatest comment ever
ExtremeBogom 1 year ago
@marcparella Silliest comment ever.
El135o 1 year ago
@El135o: After the events in Tucson over the weekend, maybe you're right.
marcparella 1 year ago
Beam me up, Scotty, there is no intellgent life on this planet.
sunaru1 11 months ago 17
@sunaru1 NO NO NO! it's Chenkov! Beam me up CHENKOV! *FACEPALM* did i just correct you on that? *sighs* it's worse than i thought
MsRocketman123 3 months ago
@marcparella even if we travel at the speed of light the time taken to reach the nearest star (Alpha Centuri) is 4.3 years and to return add 4.3 to it making it 8.6 years to know what is really happening on out nearest star. With our current technology we can travel at about 16Ma i.e, 0.000041 the speed of light so, even if we use all our resources it takes about 11,000 years to just reach the star and another 11,000 to return. Like a man on a canoe in Indian Ocean trying to find life in America
candeogauisus 10 months ago
@marcparella they won't look in the youtube comments that's for sure
unreal1298 8 months ago
@marcparella
HA !! Salient point. To expedite search you can safely exclude any & all in politics.
Attaaboy 8 months ago
why doesnt he have a british accent when he lived there for like 40 years? and damn, he looks really young
Chacha5678 1 year ago
@Chacha5678 i always wondered that too. his daughter has an accent.
WalksBehindTheRose 1 year ago
Kubrick was a master filmmaker. He overestimated the rate at which humanity would advance, but 2001 A Space Oddysey will prove to be an accurate depiction of the future of space travel in due time.
That said, it's time for humans to return to the moon!
ptraiders40 1 year ago
@ptraiders40 If we were less conserned with global warming and ending world povety, we could be living on mars now.
hughpower123 1 year ago
@hughpower123 I agree. Poverty will never end and we're just making the problem worse by giving people food and not teaching responsibility. We should focus on the stars. It's the only way to ensure our survival as a species.
ptraiders40 1 year ago
@ptraiders40 I have always said this, and seeing someone else say it is comforting. Because its not a easy thing to teach.
clarkdef 1 year ago
@hughpower123 I disagree, I think if the human race were less concerned with Religion, declaring war on homosexuals, preaching lies and denying intelligence life exists, we could living on mars. Yes poverty may yet exist regardless, but that doesn't mean we should not take care of our race as well.
SuperCoder11 1 year ago
@ptraiders40 He didn't write 2001, its was a book beforehand, he only turned it in to a movie, it wasn't his belief that by year 2001 that would have all happened.
meezocool 1 year ago
@meezocool He collaberated with Arthur C. Clarke in writing the book and the movie was actually released before the book.
Childist2 1 year ago
@meezocool No, he loosely based it off Arthur C. Clarke's short story: The Sentinel, and he collaborated with Clarke to make the movie, and Clarke rewrote the short story into a novel of the movie.
IlersichProductions 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From Thus Spoke Zarathustra... "Innocence is the child, and forgetfulness, a new beginning, a game, a self- rolling wheel, a first movement, a holy Yea. Aye, for the game of creating, my brethren, there is needed a holy Yea unto life: ITS OWN will, willeth now the spirit; HIS OWN world winneth the world's outcast. Three metamorphoses of the spirit have I designated to you: how the spirit became a camel, the camel a lion, and the lion at last a child.
MagnificentBastard12 1 year ago
Wise words grasshopper
roadranga 1 year ago
The most startling thing about Kubrick and his description of what 2001 was about, and what we know today, in 2010, is that it shows how prescient Stanley Kubrick actually was.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
Yes, indeed! Stanley Kubrick was a bona fide genius. I love his films so much.
R.I.P. Mr. Kubrick.
CitizenGatsby 1 year ago 2
I love this guy - he was a genius!
JackKlompus13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent video to an outstanding, groundbreaking film.
I came here to inform those who adore this great movie that an amateur youtube film critic named confusedmatthew has done an incredibly fallacious and misguided review of this film and I invite you all to view his cringeworthy efforts and perhaps challenge his laughably weak criticism.
u2atomicbomb 1 year ago
the man
tomes55moon 1 year ago
What accent is that?
ZanyAnton 1 year ago
@ZanyAnton Born in new york to austrian parents and lived in england for a lot of his life so alot of muddled up accents there.
hughpower123 1 year ago
@ZanyAnton brooklyn
anemone77 1 year ago
@ZanyAnton His was a watered down bronx accent.
XXmissybooXX 1 year ago
Stanley and Orson Welles are my two favorite filmmakers. They didn't see the ordinary, they saw the future of filmmaking as extraordinary beyond the human eye. Is just amazing how they saw behind the camera in a different way. Just amazing.
soccergoalkeeper1 1 year ago
to all those who hate the movie and love the book take a quick glance at who helped write the screenplay ... DURPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!
Bjouesbijou 1 year ago
Kubrick is a genre of film.
imnomonkey11 1 year ago 105
@imnomonkey11 I was gonna thumb up your comment, but it has 69 thumbs up right now, and I didn't want to mess it up. Sorry bro.
master777999 9 months ago
I bet he wasnt circumcised - that's for sure.
gingowitch 1 year ago
say what?
FK42 1 year ago
Just finished watching this film for the fourth time, and still find it a piece of shit. Bergman may have been depressive, but at least he had an intent, but Kubrick's work seems to be just a vanity project.
UltimateSerge 1 year ago
@UltimateSerge Look it this way: 2001 A Space Odyssey is a journey, as it is a journey for you. If you wanted answers... that was beyond Kubrick and Clark. Just a journey... a great one indeed.
spanishprisoner 1 year ago
@UltimateSerge It's Darwinian logic meets the next frontier. The starchild is man's transcending into a whole new realm of thought and achievement. Can man overcome reliance on computers? The bout with HAL tackles man vs artificial intelligence. The black slab appears due to other higher lifeforms working to bring man to these higher callings. Which is why shortly after you see the cavemen touch it, they discover the advantages of using weapons.
The whole film is a poetic take on transcendence
BryterJonas 1 year ago 2
@BryterJonas I guess my problem with it is that its an excessive implicit experience. Watch Bunuel's Viridiana and you have to infer certain things. But 2001 is entirely an implicit experience. In ways it seems overly suggestive without establishing a grounding.
UltimateSerge 1 year ago
@Jackofall2345 i defiantly want to be in the film industry, also where can i see your short film when its done?
underbightdog23 1 year ago
@Jackofall2345 yeah i saw some of his films when i was thirteen, the shining, and a clockwork orange, he was so brilliant. but i want to work in the film industry soon but i am only 15
underbightdog23 1 year ago
@Jackofall2345 i watched 2001 when i was 13 and i loved it, but that was because i was really into films and i loved stanley krubrick. i showed it to my 17 year old stepbrother and he hated it
underbightdog23 1 year ago
one of my fav directors, such a genious. r.i.p
sharkate7 1 year ago
2001 is so good and so profound, my friends from school never understand. 'its stupid' they say... i think theyre the stupid ones.
DaAntnee 1 year ago
i don't think this movie has anything to do with aliens but with us humans..he just used that at those times for a hype... c clark lives on Ceylon or did and a lot in this movie has to do with philosophy coming from indian and Buddhist religions..
LDLV 1 year ago
I love his voice. It's very unique and has character.
Tigerlily21 1 year ago
stanley kubrick: the greatest filmaker who ever lived
pol1407a 1 year ago 3
goto archive>wayback>yahoo... and discover!
jutubaeh 1 year ago
The Coen brothers and Terrence Malick would also make up my favorite filmmakers list along with Kubrick and Hitchcock.
Tigerlily21 1 year ago
Stop calling him genius already!
OrangeOceanOctopus 1 year ago
@OrangeOceanOctopus Yep. I'll second that.I enjoy some of his movies and he is unique, but let's face it: Barry Lyndon is unwatchable and Eyes Wide Shut was an annoying effort.I guess it's also down to the actors: Ryan O'Neal and Tom Cruise? Give me a break....I guess 2001 was a very interesting movie,but the main actor was terrible...So yeah,let's judge him realistically and cut the crap.
dixxjamm 1 year ago
le maître... le cinema avec lui devenait un miracle!!!!!!
Rejoindreserna 1 year ago
Kubrick, Leone, Hitchcock. Those 3 make my Mt. Rushmore of directors. I'll leave one spot open, maybe throw Polanski in there, Spielberg. Kubrick is the most creative though I think.
beehawl 1 year ago
Where is he in the last frame of this clip with that girl with the black hair with the fringe or bangs?...also...Kubrick doesn't really look like he was telling the truth as to what he really thinks in this clip...it was a different time back then...so who knows...maybe he did sell his soul to the devil...
jdcc061 1 year ago
kubrick had shitty grades and never went to college. the guy's a film-making savant, but he's no genius.
zackhanscom 1 year ago
@zackhanscom Since when does getting good grades and going to college qualify someone as a genius? What someone does with their career is the real acid test. Einstein and Tesla were known for doing poorly in school as well in their youth.
StanleyKu 7 months ago
You know... I always imagined Kubrick as having this booming voice. It's weird... I guess it's just the impression I got from his movies, that he was some force of nature. Oh well... he's still awesome and "2001: A Space Odyssey" is easily my favorite of his films.
FlamingSpidermonkeys 1 year ago
he looks so fucked up
boogiebuddy01 1 year ago
That interviewer probably didn't realize that he was in the presence of a genius.
DareYouNotToClick1 1 year ago
i think 2001's message was simply that there is more intelligent life out there. now if only we had all that space travel for real!
chrisw443 1 year ago
A genius...Definitely!!
MikeeMyers9 1 year ago
Kubrick transcended nationality- his films are for everyone. RIP Stanley, you gave me great joy with your genius.
coralarch 1 year ago 5
Master.
Volviert 1 year ago
Kubrick was born too early.That's his only mistake
TatooineBoy 1 year ago
Whatever the fuck accent he uses, it is amazing to see him speak for so long uninterrupted!!! What a man.
catfacecathead 1 year ago
sure well actually i have visually witenssed in the phyrical several different life froms
druha10304 1 year ago
there are a lot of accents in briton...and kubrick sounds well lame
leytonarms 1 year ago
@leytonarms he isn't a brit.
GIANTCADET 1 year ago
@GIANTCADET wasn't a brit.
paullubliner 1 year ago
Kubrick was a true unique genius.
Palegoat 1 year ago 105
@Palegoat He made some of the most boring and nonsensical movies in history.
peteagassi 1 year ago
@Palegoat He Was Also An Excellent Ass Hole, who failed miserably as a human being!
Therealtaxidriver 1 year ago
@Therealtaxidriver His wife said he was the most wonderful, considerate and generous husband and father. Take your hate campaign somewhere else.
StanleyKu 7 months ago