Gr8 video Kirk have you solved the graphite moderator trouble in the LFTR yet is copper graphite laminates the answer? Or are you moving toward graphite pellets rolling around?
We are more focused on squeezing profits out of old tech, old media, and old companies to really be in a position to where we can innovate. We are too greedy and inefficient. If we let China do this first, then they deserve to have the tech rights to it.
Well, everybody knows that the U.S. is finished. China is the future. If Mr. Sorensen really wants to see this happening, I would pack my bags and move to China.
@SuppenHahnBier I think the history lesson was required as a preface to the point he was trying to make. It gave substance to the last 6 minutes that, without, would have lacked a real "punch" if you will. I think it's kind of nice to hear WHY he feels its not being used today (in a discussion style) and not just a cut and dry bullet format list of reasons. But to each their own I suppose.
Dr. Sorensen conveniently forgets to mention the disasterous Sodium Reactor Experiment in Simi Valley CA which experienced an extensive meltdown in 1959. The highly corrosive nature of molten salt presents unprecedented engineering challenges that may far outweigh its benefits. Also, cost of reactor fuel is really not the driving factor in operating a nuclear plant, so if you spent $100/kg for Uranium instead of $30 for Thorium is really not relevant ...
Can you tell me what the role of Thorium may be? What the thinking is on Thorium, as a fuel, what the advantages are and what the disadvantages are?
Peter Lyons, Under Secretary of Energy:
We are certainly interested to look at Thorium as a possibility, particularly as a possibility for the future, but fact remains that we have the entire fuel cycle built up on Uranium, and it would be a dramatic shift and a very costly shift to move on any sort of short time scale to Thorium.
You can clearly see a parallel in "Who Killed the Electric Car". The US nuclear industry did not want the Molten Salt Reactor technology because it can impact their business, such as in new competitors, obsoleting existing plants, and reduced uranium solid fuel revenue stream. They made sure MSR does not occur by letting the officials at DOE know what they want.
Just because Nixon told the public that they needed a "fast breeder reactor for peaceful purposes" and just because he doesn't understand nuclear physics does not overturn the assertion that the defense department wanted a domestic energy system that supplied plutonium for the cold war.
And what happens when the cooling system of a molten-salt reactor fails? Because the cooling system of the reactor is ALWAYS the failure point. We won't be able to spray a million gallons of water on it. We won't be able to bury it in a million tons of concrete. No fire department on earth will be equipped to damp it. A meltdown of a molten-salt reactor will always be a worst-case scenario. By design.
Simple, really. If the cooling fails the molten-salt gets hotter.
A metal plug or two at the base is made with a metal of known melting point that will dissolve if the reactor over heats. The thorium drains into a collection pan where it becomes non-reactive and you simply restore the plug and put the salt back into the reactor vessel.
You don't need to bury thorium as its half-life is short as well as any products of said reactor.
@Knepperify1 Actually the plugs are made of FLiBe salt, just like the molten salts in the reactor. The plugs are kept cool enough to remain solid by external fans. If the salt heats up too much, the plugs overheat and melt. The fans can also be manually stopped to purge the molten salts for scheduled shutdowns (they did this every weekend with the ORNL MSR project, before going home). If power is cut off, the fans stop and the plugs also melt then.
@Blyledge Actually if the salt does leak from the reactor (the worst case scenario) it quickly expands because it's no longer under slightly-higher-than-atmospheric pressure. As it expands, nuclear reactions cease, the salt cools very rapidly and eventually solidifies. The salt is insoluble in water and stays put until you clean it up. Because the salt is reprocessed constantly during operation, there is very little Radioxenon present in it at any time to escape into the environment.
Excellent Presentation Kirk. I've been following your work for some time now and as a layman with no scientific background it's taken me many hours of listening to your presentations and those of your peers to understand how important your work is. I think that a 3 min video presenting the case for Thorium power that could be understood by anyone. Simple diagrams, powerful pictures from nature and the key non technical points put across in a video that could go viral on facebook and google+
Kirk, you should produce a documentary on LFTR and raise awareness, I think it would allay a lot of the anti-nuclear sentiment in the alternative energy community.
He isn't being misleading, energy density issues of ANY power source compared to nuclear has been known for quite sometime. What he did not go further into is how billions of people in Asia are not going to accept low power production from renewables as their economies develop. The efficiency and throughput simply isn't there to make it a national agenda. Thus you have India/China cranking out maximum coal plants, and drawing up plans new breeding reactors. Maybe a few solar plants for good PR.
the data center - solar power plant argument was so far fetched. the data center is there because of the availability of clean power and cooling. there is no need for a connection of the two. He did not go into the technical and savty problems but pitched it as a pure political issue. I liked the beginning but the rest was propaganda / misleading. There has not been one success story in breeding reactors but plenty money sunk.
Great! Someone talking about neutron energy and cross section, usually this is omitted. Sad that he was apologetic about complexety. The trend to make things easy has gone to far in the US.
Kirk, if you're there - keep up the good work! Thorium seems to be developing a very real 'Buzz' recently. I've seen pro-Th posts in all manner of forums, ranging from photography to motor oil to the comments on Hulu. Given another year, I think Th will reach k=1 in the public mind, with the grovelling politicians soon to follow.
@clumma Ft. St. Vrain didn't hit a conversion ratio higher than one, so it wasn't a breeder. The thorium-U233 dioxide final core at Shippingport did have a conversion ratio higher than one, proving that thermal breeding in thorium was truly possible.
@kirkfsorensen In the technical sense of the term, sure. I've heard "isobreeder" for reactors with conversion factor exactly 1... what's the term for something with a conversion factor < 1... "converter"?
Half of the video is about conspiracy theories nobody really cares about. Just make a really good reactor that uses a very economical cycle and pay the politicians instead of worrying about them.
@lennyhome No conspiracy theory here. Nixon wanted a fast-breeder reactor and made it national policy. Thus when Weinberg proposed a VERY different alternative it was squashed and he was fired. Not a conspiracy, just a regrettable outcome.
@kirkfsorensen American politics are influential in the rest of the world but other countries have enough resources to pursue nuclear energy. The problem is that, after all the bad publicity from the media, what Joe Public demands to reconsider nuclear energy is a breakthrough. Not just a better reactor, but an awesome new reactor that's so good that not even the stupidest and most corrupt politician and/or Hollywood star can deny. That, in my opinion, should be the focus.
@kirkfsorensen What will be a Conspiracy is if by 2020 the USA is still using these "Planet Sterilizing" power sources while China leads the way with a dozen Thorium Reactors or more. Global Elites seem to have used up the USA and it seems they are moving on to China next, leaving the once great USA in Economic/ Social/ Political shambles.
"The Dragon is Awaking while the Eagle is Starving"
@kirkfsorensen It always deppends on how you look at it....
Conspiracies happens everywhere in families, friends etc... the word conspiracy is just used when cames to people of governament, companies, but camom we are all people...
@kirkfsorensen Do the fission products from a fission by a fast-neutron differ from those of a fission by a thermal-neutron in their proportion of which isotopes of which elements get produced? I'm just curious.
Gr8 video Kirk have you solved the graphite moderator trouble in the LFTR yet is copper graphite laminates the answer? Or are you moving toward graphite pellets rolling around?
raypsi1 10 hours ago
energy independence is absolutely required for a segregated country to thrive. This is very exciting.
piecharthosen 13 hours ago
This will be eventually, the question is whether it will come too late.
Av3rnus 5 days ago
We are more focused on squeezing profits out of old tech, old media, and old companies to really be in a position to where we can innovate. We are too greedy and inefficient. If we let China do this first, then they deserve to have the tech rights to it.
HyperactiveHandfull 2 weeks ago
Well, everybody knows that the U.S. is finished. China is the future. If Mr. Sorensen really wants to see this happening, I would pack my bags and move to China.
mgleisspersonal 3 weeks ago
@mgleisspersonal You're assuming China will never have to deal with their population, one day.
ClockworkGearhead 9 hours ago
nice history lesson, but its kind of short on the Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor and why it should be used today.. only the last 6 minutes
SuppenHahnBier 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos 3
@SuppenHahnBier I think the history lesson was required as a preface to the point he was trying to make. It gave substance to the last 6 minutes that, without, would have lacked a real "punch" if you will. I think it's kind of nice to hear WHY he feels its not being used today (in a discussion style) and not just a cut and dry bullet format list of reasons. But to each their own I suppose.
nicholasrnr 1 week ago
Word ! Let's move up to bio already. Snuff the solid state machines.
TheAngrycrow 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Sorensen conveniently forgets to mention the disasterous Sodium Reactor Experiment in Simi Valley CA which experienced an extensive meltdown in 1959. The highly corrosive nature of molten salt presents unprecedented engineering challenges that may far outweigh its benefits. Also, cost of reactor fuel is really not the driving factor in operating a nuclear plant, so if you spent $100/kg for Uranium instead of $30 for Thorium is really not relevant ...
FashionOneAsia 1 month ago
Sen. Al Franken:
Can you tell me what the role of Thorium may be? What the thinking is on Thorium, as a fuel, what the advantages are and what the disadvantages are?
Peter Lyons, Under Secretary of Energy:
We are certainly interested to look at Thorium as a possibility, particularly as a possibility for the future, but fact remains that we have the entire fuel cycle built up on Uranium, and it would be a dramatic shift and a very costly shift to move on any sort of short time scale to Thorium.
arubaga 1 month ago
@arubaga But here's the kicker. Some other country might make it, and then the Americans will feel more antiquated and stupid than ever before.
a1mint 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
You can clearly see a parallel in "Who Killed the Electric Car". The US nuclear industry did not want the Molten Salt Reactor technology because it can impact their business, such as in new competitors, obsoleting existing plants, and reduced uranium solid fuel revenue stream. They made sure MSR does not occur by letting the officials at DOE know what they want.
arubaga 1 month ago 2
36 minutes D:
TheNecromancer077 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Just because Nixon told the public that they needed a "fast breeder reactor for peaceful purposes" and just because he doesn't understand nuclear physics does not overturn the assertion that the defense department wanted a domestic energy system that supplied plutonium for the cold war.
DrakeDorosh 1 month ago 3
Very informative, thanks!
ZraveX 1 month ago
Like most Americans I think I like vanilla more than chocolate, but I'm not exactly sure.
davemartin8686 1 month ago
how in the absolute fuck did i get here!? lol
cb7pwn 1 month ago
And what happens when the cooling system of a molten-salt reactor fails? Because the cooling system of the reactor is ALWAYS the failure point. We won't be able to spray a million gallons of water on it. We won't be able to bury it in a million tons of concrete. No fire department on earth will be equipped to damp it. A meltdown of a molten-salt reactor will always be a worst-case scenario. By design.
Blyledge 2 months ago
@Blyledge Isn't that why they build in a drainage system that allows the nuclear fuel to be drained into a passively cooled tank?
sinawas 2 months ago 3
@Blyledge
Simple, really. If the cooling fails the molten-salt gets hotter.
A metal plug or two at the base is made with a metal of known melting point that will dissolve if the reactor over heats. The thorium drains into a collection pan where it becomes non-reactive and you simply restore the plug and put the salt back into the reactor vessel.
You don't need to bury thorium as its half-life is short as well as any products of said reactor.
Knepperify1 1 month ago 5
@Knepperify1 Actually the plugs are made of FLiBe salt, just like the molten salts in the reactor. The plugs are kept cool enough to remain solid by external fans. If the salt heats up too much, the plugs overheat and melt. The fans can also be manually stopped to purge the molten salts for scheduled shutdowns (they did this every weekend with the ORNL MSR project, before going home). If power is cut off, the fans stop and the plugs also melt then.
OfficeThug 1 month ago 3
@Blyledge Actually if the salt does leak from the reactor (the worst case scenario) it quickly expands because it's no longer under slightly-higher-than-atmospheric pressure. As it expands, nuclear reactions cease, the salt cools very rapidly and eventually solidifies. The salt is insoluble in water and stays put until you clean it up. Because the salt is reprocessed constantly during operation, there is very little Radioxenon present in it at any time to escape into the environment.
OfficeThug 1 month ago
@Blyledge Have you even watched the video?
ThomasEJC 1 month ago
Excellent Presentation Kirk. I've been following your work for some time now and as a layman with no scientific background it's taken me many hours of listening to your presentations and those of your peers to understand how important your work is. I think that a 3 min video presenting the case for Thorium power that could be understood by anyone. Simple diagrams, powerful pictures from nature and the key non technical points put across in a video that could go viral on facebook and google+
rickholmes68 2 months ago 3
Good video.
Kirk, you should produce a documentary on LFTR and raise awareness, I think it would allay a lot of the anti-nuclear sentiment in the alternative energy community.
SevenSixTwoNato 2 months ago
Why do Google tech talks always have such poor audio and video? High school AV clubs produce higher quality material than this.
DustininSD 2 months ago
Fantastic presentation, Kirk! I'm surprised google hasn't jumped on this yet. Their electric bill must be pretty high...
therealericmeyer 2 months ago
He isn't being misleading, energy density issues of ANY power source compared to nuclear has been known for quite sometime. What he did not go further into is how billions of people in Asia are not going to accept low power production from renewables as their economies develop. The efficiency and throughput simply isn't there to make it a national agenda. Thus you have India/China cranking out maximum coal plants, and drawing up plans new breeding reactors. Maybe a few solar plants for good PR.
lacker101 2 months ago 3
the data center - solar power plant argument was so far fetched. the data center is there because of the availability of clean power and cooling. there is no need for a connection of the two. He did not go into the technical and savty problems but pitched it as a pure political issue. I liked the beginning but the rest was propaganda / misleading. There has not been one success story in breeding reactors but plenty money sunk.
0MoTheG 2 months ago
Great! Someone talking about neutron energy and cross section, usually this is omitted. Sad that he was apologetic about complexety. The trend to make things easy has gone to far in the US.
0MoTheG 2 months ago 2
wait a second...sweEden?
eberaldo 2 months ago
+e>=====*=====<-e
guitarbeast777 2 months ago
Poor Nixon, he don't get no respect! :)
Kirk, if you're there - keep up the good work! Thorium seems to be developing a very real 'Buzz' recently. I've seen pro-Th posts in all manner of forums, ranging from photography to motor oil to the comments on Hulu. Given another year, I think Th will reach k=1 in the public mind, with the grovelling politicians soon to follow.
geonerd 2 months ago
Great video! Keep up the work on Thorium Reactors!
SealTeam1 2 months ago
Fort St Vrain was also thorium breeder.
clumma 2 months ago
@clumma Ft. St. Vrain didn't hit a conversion ratio higher than one, so it wasn't a breeder. The thorium-U233 dioxide final core at Shippingport did have a conversion ratio higher than one, proving that thermal breeding in thorium was truly possible.
kirkfsorensen 2 months ago
@kirkfsorensen In the technical sense of the term, sure. I've heard "isobreeder" for reactors with conversion factor exactly 1... what's the term for something with a conversion factor < 1... "converter"?
clumma 2 months ago
Half of the video is about conspiracy theories nobody really cares about. Just make a really good reactor that uses a very economical cycle and pay the politicians instead of worrying about them.
lennyhome 2 months ago
@lennyhome No conspiracy theory here. Nixon wanted a fast-breeder reactor and made it national policy. Thus when Weinberg proposed a VERY different alternative it was squashed and he was fired. Not a conspiracy, just a regrettable outcome.
kirkfsorensen 2 months ago 41
@kirkfsorensen American politics are influential in the rest of the world but other countries have enough resources to pursue nuclear energy. The problem is that, after all the bad publicity from the media, what Joe Public demands to reconsider nuclear energy is a breakthrough. Not just a better reactor, but an awesome new reactor that's so good that not even the stupidest and most corrupt politician and/or Hollywood star can deny. That, in my opinion, should be the focus.
lennyhome 2 months ago
@kirkfsorensen Thank you for being a champion for this cause. I've been following your work for years, and will be doing so for many more.
un2mensch 2 months ago 2
@kirkfsorensen What will be a Conspiracy is if by 2020 the USA is still using these "Planet Sterilizing" power sources while China leads the way with a dozen Thorium Reactors or more. Global Elites seem to have used up the USA and it seems they are moving on to China next, leaving the once great USA in Economic/ Social/ Political shambles.
"The Dragon is Awaking while the Eagle is Starving"
ISMOPANAMA 3 weeks ago
@kirkfsorensen It always deppends on how you look at it....
Conspiracies happens everywhere in families, friends etc... the word conspiracy is just used when cames to people of governament, companies, but camom we are all people...
vegnagunL 2 weeks ago
@kirkfsorensen Do the fission products from a fission by a fast-neutron differ from those of a fission by a thermal-neutron in their proportion of which isotopes of which elements get produced? I'm just curious.
OtakuBozu 1 week ago
Good editing for a google talks video, thanks.
shmore 2 months ago 33