@93n371cfr34k i'm not 100% sure but this is an open bolt(the bolt starts in the back and moves forward when firing) gun so the firing pin has a weight on it and I think it hits the primer on the bullet when it goes all the way forward, just by momentum. I'm not positive about that, but i do know that it dosen't have a conventional hammer compared to the ak or such.
@k1baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa No, This is the gun that has been in active US military service than any other weapons system (since 1923). Its also used by many NATO and non-NATO forces all over the world.
There is a pawl that pulls the next round in. The guide that moves the pawl back and forth is reversible so you can have either right hand feed or left hand feed :)
Do Beltfed guns always work like this? Even them with the belt, that gets destroyed after the round has been taken out of it (the ones used on the M249/M240
This animation is wrong, for some reason the bolt releases the accelerator shortly after firing. The accelerator stays locked to the bolt for the duration of the cycle. Only when the bolt goes forward does it take the accelerator, as well as the barrel buffer body, and barrel body extension with it.
@MilitantOldLady actually that weight helps lessen the recoil because the gas has to overcome the inertia of the bolt and its the energy transferred from the gas to the bolt is what causes the recoil
@1airplane21 There are more things causing the recoil. At First the energy of the bullet wich has to travel backyards as well. The second one is the thing that you mentioned, the third is the Bolt as it gets stopped at its rear position, and the last recoil, even if its going forward, is when the Bolt hits the barrel/is locking itself
@andromedarr newtons law of motion, an object at rest will stay at rest until acted upon by another force. it will take more force to get a larger object moving than a smaller one
Animation is set up to show loading from the right. Had a problem on the range where the timing was set too early and the weapon fired before the bolt was fully locked forward and the round went off.
Small parts with complex movements tend to cause more problems than they solve. Reliability is everything on the field. Though MGs are used (overly imo) as heavy suppressive fire, ROF doesn't mean shit if you can't make the bullets worth their weight.
Take the all-to-common AK-47 Vs. M16Ax/M4 arguments. In terms of reliability the AK-47 wins hands down no questions asked, and it uses few, and 'large' (comparatively speaking) moving parts.
@SKoGoMoney the m16 isnt reliable because it has small parts its unreliable because of a potentially flawed gas system and tight tolerances. rifles such as the fn scar and xm8 have small parts but are reliable because of a better gas system and better tolerences
Yeah, the M2 is better against light vehicles and cars, but the MG 42 is very good against aircraft, because the rate of fire is with 1500 - 1800 rounds per minute very high.
Comment removed
TheTravisMoose 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the AN 94 operating mechanism
youtube.com/watch?v=3JxedhGg7z0
youtube.com/watch?v=Tfw4KIge_y0
If this link is not working, search for "AN 94 operating mechanism of two round burst" and click on the first and second results.
imalchanaka 5 months ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 5 months ago
wheres the hammer?
93n371cfr34k 6 months ago
@93n371cfr34k i'm not 100% sure but this is an open bolt(the bolt starts in the back and moves forward when firing) gun so the firing pin has a weight on it and I think it hits the primer on the bullet when it goes all the way forward, just by momentum. I'm not positive about that, but i do know that it dosen't have a conventional hammer compared to the ak or such.
killermonkeypeople4 5 months ago
@killermonkeypeople4 Nope, the 50 is a closed bolt.
davidjr7899 4 months ago
Your animation is NOT correct, barrel extension group can NOT be at front position before bolt because of breech!!!
xxxmv7xxx 8 months ago
i'll never get bored of repeatedly pressing 9
cannibalsrcul 8 months ago
Omg never new the barrel was below the belt on that
stephen2bubba 10 months ago
imma make one and glue it to the roof of my camry
hitmanskilz 11 months ago
Okay, that's just too interesting
Daemonhunter17 1 year ago
isnt this known as the gun that has jammed the most out of any other gun ? hahaha
k1baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 1 year ago
@k1baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa No, This is the gun that has been in active US military service than any other weapons system (since 1923). Its also used by many NATO and non-NATO forces all over the world.
ElPhantasamo 11 months ago
@ElPhantasamo lolwat
brown bess/land pattern musket served longer iirc something like 90 years tbh
SecuR0M 11 months ago
how does the chain suck in?
stanleythedoggy 1 year ago
@stanleythedoggy
There is a pawl that pulls the next round in. The guide that moves the pawl back and forth is reversible so you can have either right hand feed or left hand feed :)
mrmught 1 year ago
This video is like a quiet fart: silent but deadly.
tetsuoswrath 1 year ago
Do Beltfed guns always work like this? Even them with the belt, that gets destroyed after the round has been taken out of it (the ones used on the M249/M240
andromedarr 1 year ago
@andromedarr yea basically thats how it works the disintegrating belt links just fall out of the gun where in the video it just shows the empty belt
1airplane21 1 year ago
from 0:12 That looks wrongxD
2000BBguns 1 year ago
this thing is not using motor?
herliana0505 1 year ago
This animation is wrong, for some reason the bolt releases the accelerator shortly after firing. The accelerator stays locked to the bolt for the duration of the cycle. Only when the bolt goes forward does it take the accelerator, as well as the barrel buffer body, and barrel body extension with it.
TwistedRaven187 2 years ago
holy crap look at that giant piece of steel moving about...no wonder it has such recoil
MilitantOldLady 2 years ago 2
Lol its a friggiin steel block.
AirSOFTLOVER12 2 years ago
@MilitantOldLady actually that weight helps lessen the recoil because the gas has to overcome the inertia of the bolt and its the energy transferred from the gas to the bolt is what causes the recoil
1airplane21 1 year ago
@1airplane21 There are more things causing the recoil. At First the energy of the bullet wich has to travel backyards as well. The second one is the thing that you mentioned, the third is the Bolt as it gets stopped at its rear position, and the last recoil, even if its going forward, is when the Bolt hits the barrel/is locking itself
andromedarr 1 year ago
@andromedarr newtons law of motion, an object at rest will stay at rest until acted upon by another force. it will take more force to get a larger object moving than a smaller one
1airplane21 1 year ago
Animation is set up to show loading from the right. Had a problem on the range where the timing was set too early and the weapon fired before the bolt was fully locked forward and the round went off.
WesOrion 2 years ago
Such a simple but deadly weapon..
Range 4 or 5 miles? insaneeee!
VMFA115Starloric 2 years ago
Ah. Such large moving parts explain the relatively slow ROF.
EvansFTW 2 years ago 17
im not gonna say the m2 has a fast rof but its defiantly not slow you must remember this gun is firing a .50 bmg cartridge big parts=big cartridge =)
1airplane21 2 years ago
@EvansFTW
And reliability.
Small parts with complex movements tend to cause more problems than they solve. Reliability is everything on the field. Though MGs are used (overly imo) as heavy suppressive fire, ROF doesn't mean shit if you can't make the bullets worth their weight.
Take the all-to-common AK-47 Vs. M16Ax/M4 arguments. In terms of reliability the AK-47 wins hands down no questions asked, and it uses few, and 'large' (comparatively speaking) moving parts.
- Future 18B here.
SKoGoMoney 1 year ago
@SKoGoMoney the m16 isnt reliable because it has small parts its unreliable because of a potentially flawed gas system and tight tolerances. rifles such as the fn scar and xm8 have small parts but are reliable because of a better gas system and better tolerences
1airplane21 1 year ago
@1airplane21
That's basically what I said, man.
SKoGoMoney 1 year ago
@SKoGoMoney you said that a reliable gun uses large parts i am saying that small parts does not determine reliability
1airplane21 1 year ago
@EvansFTW Up to 1,200 RPM is slow?
lolwat
SecuR0M 11 months ago
@SecuR0M wtf ??? 1200 its theoretic rate of fire is 600 rpm in praxis its even less
xx0MangiPogo0xx 7 months ago
I like how the bolt "grabs" another round.
residentevil4freek 2 years ago 4
I never knew it pulled it back before loading it, not like anything I have seen
hogielove 3 years ago
Never new it would be this simple.
Sugargoober 3 years ago 14
Me too when I first saw it. Now just imagine it doing this about 10 time a second. 80
ajpeters12 3 years ago 8
@Sugargoober The best guns are simple.
laksemann 1 year ago
Yeah, the M2 is better against light vehicles and cars, but the MG 42 is very good against aircraft, because the rate of fire is with 1500 - 1800 rounds per minute very high.
Geschichtsfreund93 3 years ago
Interesting.
Great American machine gun, probably better than the MG 42.
captainporpoise 3 years ago