STOP FUCKING worrying about other nations :S we've fucking survived our all lives without the fucking US interference .... what makes you think we can't determine our own futures :@ fukcing fuckkk fuckkk you bush
You can tell by the audio sound (tunnel effect) that the information is being sent by digitally encrypted radio to his ear piece. That is how digital encryption sounds after it is deciphered.
Well the US would use any means to make their leader look smart. And we have all seen him respond to a question that he didnt have a pre-made response to... Now thats funny
im not gonna enter into any arguements here - im just gonna say - that is not his earpiece that you can there. the voice of the 'ear piece' is actually bushes voice. listen to the exact pronounciations of words, pauses. this is just clever editing by whom ever got hold of this video clip, or its some kind of error on input. either way, its not an earpiece.
I am a professional interpereter, and have sometimes experienced this kind of thing. The techies get the wires mixed up, and the translation goes into the wrong set of earphones. Bush was wired so he could hear Chirac's address piped in in English real time. I'm not sure why the English was superimposed over Bush, but it sounds like an edit job to make it look like a prompt. Also, the press would have had access to the English interperetation earphone of Chirac's address.
I'm sorry I'm not pro Bush I'm quite the opposite... But I've worked alot in sound engineering and this has to be a hoax.. it's just simply not possible unless you can explain how it was picked up? a wireless frequency anomaly maybe.. but their microphones arent wireless.. knowing Bush he put his earpice in backwards then realised he couldn't hear it and turned it up!
And his eyes flick back and forth as he listens to the voice in his ear -- and occasionally mutters back to his secret helper. See isbushwired dot com for more.
You can also tell that this is not someone coaching Bush, because the voice is also there when the reporter is speaking.
When Bush actually uses a prompter/wire at his own press conferences and at the debates, etc., his speech is not smooth as here, but weirdly halting, with many odd pauses and then sudden bursts of words, some of which sound as if he misheard them.
Way to leave four comments on my YouTube video. Next time you get this excited about someone's video, why don't you just redirect us to your blog? I appreciate the discussion, might be appropriate if you went into greater depth elsewhere.
2) When a president speaks, there's someone called a "repeater" who repeats every word very clearly and evenly into a separately timed internal audio feed for the simultaneous translators. It is not meant for broadcast. 3) Sometimes that's mistakenly mixed into the broadcast feed of the event and then you'll hear them both out of their actual chronological order
so that it sounds as if Bush is repeating after the other voice --when in real time it happened the other way around.
However, this is not one of those cases. As it was explained to me: 1) when a live tv event goes out, there's a delay of a few seconds between the actual moment and when you see and hear it on tv. (cont. below)
I also believe that Bush habitually uses a concealed earpiece with a live coach prompting him on the other end, and that he cheated with one during his first 2004 debate with Kerry (and perhaps during the other two debates, too). There are a bunch of videos on youtube that show his strange verbal performance. Search with the terms Bush wired and you will find them.
I remember when this happened. This is NOT fake. Bush often uses an earpiece for long speeches. That's why it was such an issue during the debates with Kerry. If the idiot uses them for SOME things, it's not out of the realm of possibility that he used it for the debates. Which is strictly prohibited - in words only.
the debates are such artificial pageantry anyway, but it's amusing to watch the varieties of froth produced by True Believers when even this level is presented.
the New York Times editorial staff suppressed a 2004 pre-election report on Bush's prompter earpiece, which can be clearly seen in several debate shots. They did not want to run the story, as "it may affect election results"
who fucked up
MrWorldbefree 2 years ago
Pre-approved questions, a planned order of reporters.
Purgatron 3 years ago
STOP FUCKING worrying about other nations :S we've fucking survived our all lives without the fucking US interference .... what makes you think we can't determine our own futures :@ fukcing fuckkk fuckkk you bush
SulTaNo0o0 3 years ago
You can tell by the audio sound (tunnel effect) that the information is being sent by digitally encrypted radio to his ear piece. That is how digital encryption sounds after it is deciphered.
RayAir1 3 years ago
lol, thats just funny.
joe1the2best 3 years ago
Well the US would use any means to make their leader look smart. And we have all seen him respond to a question that he didnt have a pre-made response to... Now thats funny
Articnorge 3 years ago
ROFL Did everyone in the building hear Bush's earpiece transmission?
MikeIronweaver56 3 years ago
isnt that his own voice? like rehearsing on a recorder?
endlessrskies 3 years ago
Yes. It's a technique which newsreaders also utilize.
Purgatron 3 years ago
He's only the puppet, the real question is: who is pulling the stings?
Sandprints840 3 years ago
for real?
eidehenre 3 years ago
he pronounced it nuc-u-ler...not nu-clear...oh Bushy, cant wait till ur gone...
VILTOIRxoxo 3 years ago
Fake or not this shows how his pauses allow the correct amount of time for this to be possible.
beastshawnee 3 years ago
haha, President Bush, he tries so hard, yet fails so miserably. I sort of feel sorry for him... NOT!!!
beerdrinker1988 3 years ago
like we are all surprised durrrr
rikandles 3 years ago 8
Bush is chimp, nay a gimp. The world will be much better when he has gone.
ve240 3 years ago 24
insulting to chimps
esxp 3 years ago 4
There is serious evidence that Bush is weired on regular occasions, but it is not in this video.
webeffect 3 years ago 7
im not gonna enter into any arguements here - im just gonna say - that is not his earpiece that you can there. the voice of the 'ear piece' is actually bushes voice. listen to the exact pronounciations of words, pauses. this is just clever editing by whom ever got hold of this video clip, or its some kind of error on input. either way, its not an earpiece.
spruce86 3 years ago 3
Incorrect.
Purgatron 3 years ago
I am a professional interpereter, and have sometimes experienced this kind of thing. The techies get the wires mixed up, and the translation goes into the wrong set of earphones. Bush was wired so he could hear Chirac's address piped in in English real time. I'm not sure why the English was superimposed over Bush, but it sounds like an edit job to make it look like a prompt. Also, the press would have had access to the English interperetation earphone of Chirac's address.
bitherwack 3 years ago 2
has anybody noted the _subliminal messages_ in the end of the video? or is that just what fox broadcasts to the poor america?
sekasin 4 years ago
I'm sorry I'm not pro Bush I'm quite the opposite... But I've worked alot in sound engineering and this has to be a hoax.. it's just simply not possible unless you can explain how it was picked up? a wireless frequency anomaly maybe.. but their microphones arent wireless.. knowing Bush he put his earpice in backwards then realised he couldn't hear it and turned it up!
dylanbeckett 4 years ago 3
And his eyes flick back and forth as he listens to the voice in his ear -- and occasionally mutters back to his secret helper. See isbushwired dot com for more.
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
You can also tell that this is not someone coaching Bush, because the voice is also there when the reporter is speaking.
When Bush actually uses a prompter/wire at his own press conferences and at the debates, etc., his speech is not smooth as here, but weirdly halting, with many odd pauses and then sudden bursts of words, some of which sound as if he misheard them.
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
Way to leave four comments on my YouTube video. Next time you get this excited about someone's video, why don't you just redirect us to your blog? I appreciate the discussion, might be appropriate if you went into greater depth elsewhere.
Purgatron 4 years ago
I don't think the explanation of the audio looping mixup is on the blog, so I thought it was a good idea to post it here.
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
2) When a president speaks, there's someone called a "repeater" who repeats every word very clearly and evenly into a separately timed internal audio feed for the simultaneous translators. It is not meant for broadcast. 3) Sometimes that's mistakenly mixed into the broadcast feed of the event and then you'll hear them both out of their actual chronological order
so that it sounds as if Bush is repeating after the other voice --when in real time it happened the other way around.
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
Exactly, someone just laid the audio back out of the time sequence to create an aural illusion.
The IFB is for "help" answering live unrehearsed questions.
Bush is reading
nwrhino 4 years ago
However, this is not one of those cases. As it was explained to me: 1) when a live tv event goes out, there's a delay of a few seconds between the actual moment and when you see and hear it on tv. (cont. below)
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
I also believe that Bush habitually uses a concealed earpiece with a live coach prompting him on the other end, and that he cheated with one during his first 2004 debate with Kerry (and perhaps during the other two debates, too). There are a bunch of videos on youtube that show his strange verbal performance. Search with the terms Bush wired and you will find them.
myutubeaccount2006 4 years ago
Actually I observed a bit of this during the 2004 debates.
My mom called me to ask if I had noticed it so I know i am not crazy if she heard it too.
KelseaMcbelsea 4 years ago
I remember when this happened. This is NOT fake. Bush often uses an earpiece for long speeches. That's why it was such an issue during the debates with Kerry. If the idiot uses them for SOME things, it's not out of the realm of possibility that he used it for the debates. Which is strictly prohibited - in words only.
BramBones 4 years ago 8
the debates are such artificial pageantry anyway, but it's amusing to watch the varieties of froth produced by True Believers when even this level is presented.
Purgatron 3 years ago
??? Well he is a puppet.
izakdavid 4 years ago
or a fkin vintriquilist.
slicked25 4 years ago
This is not fake is it, I mean you have not edited this. Because I can't remember if this was a big news story because surely it would be.
lauracrazygirl 4 years ago
the New York Times editorial staff suppressed a 2004 pre-election report on Bush's prompter earpiece, which can be clearly seen in several debate shots. They did not want to run the story, as "it may affect election results"
Purgatron 3 years ago 2