Added: 4 years ago
From: Purgatron
Views: 40,906
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • who fucked up

  • Pre-approved questions, a planned order of reporters.

  • STOP FUCKING worrying about other nations :S we've fucking survived our all lives without the fucking US interference .... what makes you think we can't determine our own futures :@ fukcing fuckkk fuckkk you bush

  • You can tell by the audio sound (tunnel effect) that the information is being sent by digitally encrypted radio to his ear piece. That is how digital encryption sounds after it is deciphered.

  • lol, thats just funny.

  • Well the US would use any means to make their leader look smart. And we have all seen him respond to a question that he didnt have a pre-made response to... Now thats funny

  • ROFL Did everyone in the building hear Bush's earpiece transmission?

  • isnt that his own voice? like rehearsing on a recorder?

  • Yes. It's a technique which newsreaders also utilize.

  • He's only the puppet, the real question is: who is pulling the stings?

  • for real?

  • he pronounced it nuc-u-ler...not nu-clear...oh Bushy, cant wait till ur gone...

  • Fake or not this shows how his pauses allow the correct amount of time for this to be possible.

  • haha, President Bush, he tries so hard, yet fails so miserably. I sort of feel sorry for him... NOT!!!

  • like we are all surprised durrrr

  • Bush is chimp, nay a gimp. The world will be much better when he has gone.

  • insulting to chimps

  • There is serious evidence that Bush is weired on regular occasions, but it is not in this video.

  • im not gonna enter into any arguements here - im just gonna say - that is not his earpiece that you can there. the voice of the 'ear piece' is actually bushes voice. listen to the exact pronounciations of words, pauses. this is just clever editing by whom ever got hold of this video clip, or its some kind of error on input. either way, its not an earpiece.

  • Incorrect.

  • I am a professional interpereter, and have sometimes experienced this kind of thing. The techies get the wires mixed up, and the translation goes into the wrong set of earphones. Bush was wired so he could hear Chirac's address piped in in English real time. I'm not sure why the English was superimposed over Bush, but it sounds like an edit job to make it look like a prompt. Also, the press would have had access to the English interperetation earphone of Chirac's address.

  • has anybody noted the _subliminal messages_ in the end of the video? or is that just what fox broadcasts to the poor america?

  • I'm sorry I'm not pro Bush I'm quite the opposite... But I've worked alot in sound engineering and this has to be a hoax.. it's just simply not possible unless you can explain how it was picked up? a wireless frequency anomaly maybe.. but their microphones arent wireless.. knowing Bush he put his earpice in backwards then realised he couldn't hear it and turned it up!

  • And his eyes flick back and forth as he listens to the voice in his ear -- and occasionally mutters back to his secret helper. See isbushwired dot com for more.

  • You can also tell that this is not someone coaching Bush, because the voice is also there when the reporter is speaking.

    When Bush actually uses a prompter/wire at his own press conferences and at the debates, etc., his speech is not smooth as here, but weirdly halting, with many odd pauses and then sudden bursts of words, some of which sound as if he misheard them.

  • Way to leave four comments on my YouTube video. Next time you get this excited about someone's video, why don't you just redirect us to your blog? I appreciate the discussion, might be appropriate if you went into greater depth elsewhere.

  • I don't think the explanation of the audio looping mixup is on the blog, so I thought it was a good idea to post it here.

  • 2) When a president speaks, there's someone called a "repeater" who repeats every word very clearly and evenly into a separately timed internal audio feed for the simultaneous translators. It is not meant for broadcast. 3) Sometimes that's mistakenly mixed into the broadcast feed of the event and then you'll hear them both out of their actual chronological order

    so that it sounds as if Bush is repeating after the other voice --when in real time it happened the other way around.

  • Exactly, someone just laid the audio back out of the time sequence to create an aural illusion.

    The IFB is for "help" answering live unrehearsed questions.

    Bush is reading

  • However, this is not one of those cases. As it was explained to me: 1) when a live tv event goes out, there's a delay of a few seconds between the actual moment and when you see and hear it on tv. (cont. below)

  • I also believe that Bush habitually uses a concealed earpiece with a live coach prompting him on the other end, and that he cheated with one during his first 2004 debate with Kerry (and perhaps during the other two debates, too). There are a bunch of videos on youtube that show his strange verbal performance. Search with the terms Bush wired and you will find them.

  • Actually I observed a bit of this during the 2004 debates.

    My mom called me to ask if I had noticed it so I know i am not crazy if she heard it too.

  • I remember when this happened. This is NOT fake. Bush often uses an earpiece for long speeches. That's why it was such an issue during the debates with Kerry. If the idiot uses them for SOME things, it's not out of the realm of possibility that he used it for the debates. Which is strictly prohibited - in words only.

  • the debates are such artificial pageantry anyway, but it's amusing to watch the varieties of froth produced by True Believers when even this level is presented.

  • ??? Well he is a puppet.

  • or a fkin vintriquilist.

  • This is not fake is it, I mean you have not edited this. Because I can't remember if this was a big news story because surely it would be.

  • the New York Times editorial staff suppressed a 2004 pre-election report on Bush's prompter earpiece, which can be clearly seen in several debate shots. They did not want to run the story, as "it may affect election results"

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more