People need to be aware that there has been no cost of living increase 2 years running, on social security, and on veterans compensation benefits. They claim no inflation, but Canadians ARE getting COLAs, even as their dollar exceeds US dollar. Funny money math.
Cutting gov spending will mean more people out work meaning even lower demand for products and services meaning lower economic activity which means more private sector layoffs which means lower revenues for government.
At this point I'm wondering whether Obama isn't the Manchurian President. Has anyone ever held a queen of diamonds card up to his face and observed what happens...?
@JBBlitz The problem is, the Republicans want to steal it from your kids and to give it to the rich even more than the Democrats. They're both into corporate welfare -- the only difference is, the Dems got into power by lying about it to their voters. You have no party left that won't rob you blind to feed the plutocracy.
Privatize social security will create jobs, lower cost of retirement, make sure there will be money left for the kids and a reliable system that will not have goverment recklessly spending. if we don't do this, our taxes will double to pay for it from 7-15 to 15-30 or there won't be any money left.
@JBBlitz You mean the same way that the tax cuts created jobs, that private health insurance lowered costs of treatment (compared to all other developed countries), and there will absolutely positively be no reckless gambling with your investments, requiring a massive bailout? And as for higher taxes, that's horrible! You might have to live through another '90s -- or '80s or '70s or '60s or '50s, in which you paid more taxes but actually had a job and your house wasn't in foreclosure...
@JBBlitz What is reliable about a retirement system that depends on the stock market? I've seen so many private companies go bankrupt in my life, I'd be hard put to choose any one of them that I'd trust to even be there in the future. And besides, social security is also a disability insurance system.
@JBBlitz Yeah, we see what side your bread is buttered on. You've got all the money you need, and h___ with those other people who don't have that. They aren't real anyway, eh? You have a sociopathic problem.
@JBBlitz Yeah, we see what side your bread is buttered on. You've got all the money you need, and h___ with those other people who don't have that. They aren't real anyway, eh? You have a sociopathic problem.
@therealcharismatron But at least now it is clear that Obama is the opposition, not an ally. At least now the lines are clear. In many ways the past two years were much more frustrating, when progressives thought the man was on their side even while nothing was getting done. Now at least they know why. He was always a plutocratic sleeper cell and all his great rhetoric was just bullshit and a scam...
If you find him to be centrist on civil liberties or economics, that's your opinion and I respect that (even if I profoundly disagree).
That being said...
The term Neo-Liberal has nothing to do with a Right / Left paradigm. In order to be considered Neo-Liberal your policies must reflect 1- Free Trade, 2 - Minimal Government, 3- Privatization of Most Government Sevices, and 4 - Minimal Taxation.
Obama meets the criteria. To assert that he is not a Neo-Liberal is false.
@AtomicDaytime so basically i was correct neo liberal is the same bullshit as a centrist right, i dont even know why he is not a republican if he is right wing
Oh, great, is neoliberal becoming a mainstream word? I don't like it. Neocon already covers that. Rahm Emmanual, Obama - liberal hating neocons with slightly less bloodlust than Republican neocons. Neocons, neolibs, neonazis - neo is starting to take on a pretty sinister connotation.
Sam, stop drinking so much Cenk Kool-Aid. The Bush Tax Cuts where always going to be renewed, the Obama Administration only made a big deal out of them in order to get unemployment benefits extended and additional tax cuts for the middle class. A 2 year, 2% cut into the income tax towards SS covered by the general fund is peanuts and will not be used by his Administration as an excuse to cut SS... they have plenty of reasons to do that, they don't have to pull any out of their ass.
The majority of voters, including many who foolishly voted for him, now reject the tax and spend, failed era of Obamaism.
Geostrategic1 1 year ago
People need to be aware that there has been no cost of living increase 2 years running, on social security, and on veterans compensation benefits. They claim no inflation, but Canadians ARE getting COLAs, even as their dollar exceeds US dollar. Funny money math.
bodryn 1 year ago
Cutting gov spending will mean more people out work meaning even lower demand for products and services meaning lower economic activity which means more private sector layoffs which means lower revenues for government.
The circle of republican economics.
paradigm918 1 year ago
Can you do color coded map of America to show % of wealth and/or income of 2% richest Americans substituting sq miles for $
Americanscare 1 year ago
At this point I'm wondering whether Obama isn't the Manchurian President. Has anyone ever held a queen of diamonds card up to his face and observed what happens...?
OolTube02 1 year ago
@OolTube02 I think it may be the Joker.
bodryn 1 year ago
freaking socialist thieves don't want to fix the problem, they want to steal our kids money, which is sad. Democrats = Thieves
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz The problem is, the Republicans want to steal it from your kids and to give it to the rich even more than the Democrats. They're both into corporate welfare -- the only difference is, the Dems got into power by lying about it to their voters. You have no party left that won't rob you blind to feed the plutocracy.
Sucks to be you guys...
OolTube02 1 year ago
Privatize social security will create jobs, lower cost of retirement, make sure there will be money left for the kids and a reliable system that will not have goverment recklessly spending. if we don't do this, our taxes will double to pay for it from 7-15 to 15-30 or there won't be any money left.
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz THAT IS SUCH BULLSHIT!! SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOYT CONNECTED TO THE DEBT YOU FOX NEWS IDIOT!!!
captcrais101 1 year ago
@JBBlitz you are an absolute fucking moron.
Umberto2 1 year ago
@JBBlitz You mean the same way that the tax cuts created jobs, that private health insurance lowered costs of treatment (compared to all other developed countries), and there will absolutely positively be no reckless gambling with your investments, requiring a massive bailout? And as for higher taxes, that's horrible! You might have to live through another '90s -- or '80s or '70s or '60s or '50s, in which you paid more taxes but actually had a job and your house wasn't in foreclosure...
OolTube02 1 year ago
@JBBlitz What is reliable about a retirement system that depends on the stock market? I've seen so many private companies go bankrupt in my life, I'd be hard put to choose any one of them that I'd trust to even be there in the future. And besides, social security is also a disability insurance system.
bodryn 1 year ago
@KOMC4444 Calling Obama a Centrist does not mean she is in love with him. He is a phony. So are the republicans.
captcrais101 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
abolish or privatize social security now.
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz Yes, I hope they turn it over to Wall Street and your Grandma has to eat cat food soon, and you will eat it later.
siksastaka 1 year ago
@siksastaka o she is a millionare don't worry
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz Yeah, we see what side your bread is buttered on. You've got all the money you need, and h___ with those other people who don't have that. They aren't real anyway, eh? You have a sociopathic problem.
bodryn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JBBlitz Yeah, we see what side your bread is buttered on. You've got all the money you need, and h___ with those other people who don't have that. They aren't real anyway, eh? You have a sociopathic problem.
bodryn 1 year ago
@JBBlitz Yeah great idea. Give Social Security to wallstreet. That is a dumb idea.
captcrais101 1 year ago
@captcrais101 goverment social security is a bad idea
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz And let's rescind women's right to vote and re-introduce slavery while we're at it...!
OolTube02 1 year ago
@OolTube02 thats your ideas not mine
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz Not ready to go all the way back to the good old days yet, are we? Baby steps...
OolTube02 1 year ago
Damn, this is depressing. Something's got to give . . .
therealcharismatron 1 year ago
@therealcharismatron But at least now it is clear that Obama is the opposition, not an ally. At least now the lines are clear. In many ways the past two years were much more frustrating, when progressives thought the man was on their side even while nothing was getting done. Now at least they know why. He was always a plutocratic sleeper cell and all his great rhetoric was just bullshit and a scam...
OolTube02 1 year ago 4
The problem is hes scared of the Republicans.. He just doesn't fight for what really needs doing.
RogueAutomotive 1 year ago
obama sucks
MeganANDMiley 1 year ago
@KOMC4444 Idiocy. Obama's a centrist--and he's not "neo" anything.
MaryJesusJoseph 1 year ago
@MaryJesusJoseph
Wrong.
He IS Neo-Liberal.
Look it up.
AtomicDaytime 1 year ago
@AtomicDaytime He's sketchy to centrist on civil liberties, he's centrist on economics.
MaryJesusJoseph 1 year ago
@MaryJesusJoseph
If you find him to be centrist on civil liberties or economics, that's your opinion and I respect that (even if I profoundly disagree).
That being said...
The term Neo-Liberal has nothing to do with a Right / Left paradigm. In order to be considered Neo-Liberal your policies must reflect 1- Free Trade, 2 - Minimal Government, 3- Privatization of Most Government Sevices, and 4 - Minimal Taxation.
Obama meets the criteria. To assert that he is not a Neo-Liberal is false.
AtomicDaytime 1 year ago 8
@AtomicDaytime so basically i was correct neo liberal is the same bullshit as a centrist right, i dont even know why he is not a republican if he is right wing
arga400 1 year ago 2
@AtomicDaytime
Took the words right out of my mouth.
GeneticIdentity101 1 year ago
@AtomicDaytime is neo liberal another name for centrist right?
arga400 1 year ago
@arga400
Kind of. But not quite.
Read my second response to MaryJesusJoseph. :)
AtomicDaytime 1 year ago
@AtomicDaytime
Oh, great, is neoliberal becoming a mainstream word? I don't like it. Neocon already covers that. Rahm Emmanual, Obama - liberal hating neocons with slightly less bloodlust than Republican neocons. Neocons, neolibs, neonazis - neo is starting to take on a pretty sinister connotation.
TheGiantRobot 1 year ago
That is funny--it never occurred to me that Victoria Jackson does sound like an even dumber Edith Bunker.
MaryJesusJoseph 1 year ago
Sam, stop drinking so much Cenk Kool-Aid. The Bush Tax Cuts where always going to be renewed, the Obama Administration only made a big deal out of them in order to get unemployment benefits extended and additional tax cuts for the middle class. A 2 year, 2% cut into the income tax towards SS covered by the general fund is peanuts and will not be used by his Administration as an excuse to cut SS... they have plenty of reasons to do that, they don't have to pull any out of their ass.
wkcr 1 year ago
Gee, I hope the Mayans were right about 2012, if not were SCREWEDDDDDD...
grendelcatt 1 year ago 4