@antaloliver If you mean the 1965 movie, 'Dr Who & The Daleks', I'm not sure if you can see more than clips or theatrical trailers on line. A reasonably priced DVD release of both movies is available, however, complete with a documentary about the movies.
Each of the actors playing Dr. Who brings something different to the role. Peter Cushing, coming before there WAS a canon, is a bit disadvantaged compared to those actors with whom we're more familiar in latter times. Personally, I think his dignity and reputation were essential in gaining the program serious consideration from critics -- giving it a sendoff with the power and velocity to make it the cultural mainstay it is today, even here in Texas.
@dramaticguy It's supposed to be something the human scientist Dr Who has invented and built himself in his own backyard. As such, I think it works. Remember, the Time Lords didn't show up until 1969 (4 years after this) and the idea that the Doctor on TV was an alien was only hinted at and suggested, never really specified.
@MegaCooldude105 To be fair, the light wasn't very consistent on the TV show at the time, either. More significantly, in the early part of the movie, the Daleks' lights are flashing when they aren't talking. The legend says that nobody told the director why their lights flashed, but perhaps he just felt it looked good. Some of the Dalek dialogue is painfully slow when fitting in with slowly flashing lights. Still a good movie, though. Thanks.
@GMMReviews LOL! Well spotted. Don't let Stephen Moffatt know or he'll be writing a reference to this movie into the next series and pretending it was all part of some grand story arc he had in mind all along!
Durring the part were Susan was explaining to Ian how it is bigger.... can anyone translate from Sicence to English please. I could not understand what she was saying.... lol
@GTAIVFan17 The TARDIS is composed of 2 dimensions. The interior is in another dimension than the exterior, while the 2 are always connected through the main door. This is why the interior can be much bigger than the exterior of the TARDIS, as it actually isn't really the interior...it's in another dimension. (or it IS another dimension)
@Suthek Although I like the idea of seeing inside the TARDIS from outside, in the new series, I also liked the old black region between the two doorways in the old series.
@benToddTv The first episode of Dr Who was about 24 minutes long. The film makers had 5 or 10 minutes to introduce Doctor Who (as he was named in the TV credits) and the TARDIS so that they could get on with the story - a human inventor was a neat solution. The Time Lords didn't appear on TV until 1969, and Gallifrey wasn't named until 'The Time Warrior'. I believe the concept of TARDISes being grown first appeared in the post-1989 novels, though now is accepted in the New Series (not in 1965).
@ManservantPablo I don't have a problem with it. I think the plasticity of the Doctor Who legend is one of the reasons for its success and endurance, whereas rigid canonical continuity might have killed it off decades ago. I'm sure some people were unhappy with the regeneration and would have preferred a Hurndall-esque solution to the Hartnell problem; ie. similarly-aged actor in same wig and costume.
The first I saw of Doctor Who was the second Dalek movie with Peter Cushing. It was years before I saw the series over in the USA. It was with Tom Baker's "Robot" episode and I remember thinking there must be a lot more of this than I know about. Been a die hard fan every since. Seems you love him or hate him but he is one of the big 3 of all time! Doctor Who, Star Trek, and Star Wars!
@Trekkienut4 The films are a good introduction to the mythology of Doctor Who, including that of the series, strictly canonical or not. They are more accessible than the TV versions of the same stories. More than 40 years on, their legacy is shining through in the new (2005 - onwards) series.
Brilliant! Seems someone else can appreciate the old movies too. A lot of people seem to forget that the Daleks in these movies were different colors denoting rank. The new Daleks look great and I was a bit tired of the idea of contaminated Dalek DNA. The originals are back! Thanks for this video. I always love Peter Cushing!
@Trekkienut4 No problem, thanks for the comment. The Cushing Doctor and his movies (as well as the big, bright colourful Daleks) have a special place in my heart too! Mark Gatiss clearly feels the same. It is now not only cool to be a Doctor Who fan but, as a fan, it is now acceptable to like the Dr Who movies, canonical or not.
... Time VORTEX its the time VORTEX
TTTEproductions 1 week ago
Evacuate the TARDIS? In our moment of triumph?
superyerfdog 1 month ago 2
@outofthegreenmist Awww! Thank you! :3
antaloliver 1 month ago
Where can I find the whole episode?!?
antaloliver 1 month ago
@antaloliver If you mean the 1965 movie, 'Dr Who & The Daleks', I'm not sure if you can see more than clips or theatrical trailers on line. A reasonably priced DVD release of both movies is available, however, complete with a documentary about the movies.
outofthegreenmist 1 month ago
Each of the actors playing Dr. Who brings something different to the role. Peter Cushing, coming before there WAS a canon, is a bit disadvantaged compared to those actors with whom we're more familiar in latter times. Personally, I think his dignity and reputation were essential in gaining the program serious consideration from critics -- giving it a sendoff with the power and velocity to make it the cultural mainstay it is today, even here in Texas.
acaciadad 1 month ago 2
@acaciadad I agree. He is overlooked by many fans. He blazed the trail for other actors to take on the role. Thank you for your comment.
outofthegreenmist 1 month ago
The door opens the right way!!
void2258 1 month ago
@nvbghbvmn Of course it is, it's also a she.
XxSleepyheadxKiddoxX 1 month ago
Love the TARDIS exterior,sham eth einterior is so naff looking.
dramaticguy 2 months ago
@dramaticguy It's supposed to be something the human scientist Dr Who has invented and built himself in his own backyard. As such, I think it works. Remember, the Time Lords didn't show up until 1969 (4 years after this) and the idea that the Doctor on TV was an alien was only hinted at and suggested, never really specified.
outofthegreenmist 2 months ago
notice how in the beginning they said this IS TARDIS, so the TARDIS is a living creature in a sense, cool!
nvbghbvmn 2 months ago
@nvbghbvmn Interesting observation.
outofthegreenmist 2 months ago
@nvbghbvmn Yup. well there is TECHNICHLY a "Soul" in a TARDIS (See "The Doctor's Wife")
TARDISFanMan 1 month ago
"This is TARDIS" - brilliant!
love Roy Castle's suit in this.
thregar 3 months ago
@thregar Yes, he looks a bit like the tenth Doctor.
outofthegreenmist 3 months ago
Well this Doctor actually looks like a real scientist like he's supposed to be.
zonilo1 5 months ago
@zonilo1 I look like a dork that walk around in slacker clothes. I'm still a scientist.
Zejex 2 months ago
@Zejex Are you telling me that you're a badly dressed scientist or are you commenting on this video?
outofthegreenmist 2 months ago
@outofthegreenmist Scientist can walk in any kind of clothes.
Zejex 2 months ago
Anyone else notice the light is still flashing after the tardis is landed?
MegaCooldude105 6 months ago
@MegaCooldude105 To be fair, the light wasn't very consistent on the TV show at the time, either. More significantly, in the early part of the movie, the Daleks' lights are flashing when they aren't talking. The legend says that nobody told the director why their lights flashed, but perhaps he just felt it looked good. Some of the Dalek dialogue is painfully slow when fitting in with slowly flashing lights. Still a good movie, though. Thanks.
outofthegreenmist 5 months ago
This Dr. Who looks a lot like Nikola Tesla.
rredhawk2 7 months ago
this Doctor Who is more like Doc Brown
berryje1964 8 months ago
@berryje1964 Doc Brown is more like this Doctor Who!
outofthegreenmist 8 months ago 5
haha weeping nagel at the beggining ;)
GMMReviews 8 months ago
@GMMReviews LOL! Well spotted. Don't let Stephen Moffatt know or he'll be writing a reference to this movie into the next series and pretending it was all part of some grand story arc he had in mind all along!
outofthegreenmist 8 months ago 9
@outofthegreenmist lol very true
kristheprankster 2 months ago
Damn it Doctor! Take the damn brakes off! :-)
GTAIVFan17 9 months ago
That guy is way too pessimistic...he doesn't say "It's bigger from the inside.", he sais "It's smaller from the outside."
I don't like that Glass-is-half-empty-dude -.-
Suthek 1 year ago
@Suthek It's all relative.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
You know, the first time I saw this scene from the film. My first words where...
"But it didn't make the noise. You know huuurrrrh huuuurh huuuuuuuuuurhh..."
It's great to hear the Cushing movie with the proper sounds. It didn't seem right with that strange warbling increasing tone it used.
bazookoidben 1 year ago
@bazookoidben Have you heard the effect from the 'Pescatons' LP? It sounds like an aircraft landing!
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
Did you take the Tardis landing sound from the Mcgann TV Movie? Nice sound editing :-)
coecludd 1 year ago
@coecludd Many thanks! Just used the standard sound effect.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
Durring the part were Susan was explaining to Ian how it is bigger.... can anyone translate from Sicence to English please. I could not understand what she was saying.... lol
GTAIVFan17 1 year ago
@GTAIVFan17 The TARDIS is composed of 2 dimensions. The interior is in another dimension than the exterior, while the 2 are always connected through the main door. This is why the interior can be much bigger than the exterior of the TARDIS, as it actually isn't really the interior...it's in another dimension. (or it IS another dimension)
Suthek 1 year ago
@Suthek Although I like the idea of seeing inside the TARDIS from outside, in the new series, I also liked the old black region between the two doorways in the old series.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
2 questions this is tardis? its THE tardis and the doctor dident creat the tardis , tardis's are not built there grown on gallifrey
benToddTv 1 year ago
@benToddTv The first episode of Dr Who was about 24 minutes long. The film makers had 5 or 10 minutes to introduce Doctor Who (as he was named in the TV credits) and the TARDIS so that they could get on with the story - a human inventor was a neat solution. The Time Lords didn't appear on TV until 1969, and Gallifrey wasn't named until 'The Time Warrior'. I believe the concept of TARDISes being grown first appeared in the post-1989 novels, though now is accepted in the New Series (not in 1965).
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
isn't this suppose to be an alternate reality
ryananderson280195 1 year ago
"This is tardis"
ManservantPablo 1 year ago
@ManservantPablo It sure is.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
ohhh... not happy to hear the doctor say "this is my latest invention"
ManservantPablo 1 year ago
@ManservantPablo I don't have a problem with it. I think the plasticity of the Doctor Who legend is one of the reasons for its success and endurance, whereas rigid canonical continuity might have killed it off decades ago. I'm sure some people were unhappy with the regeneration and would have preferred a Hurndall-esque solution to the Hartnell problem; ie. similarly-aged actor in same wig and costume.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
fantastic!
Who disliked this?????????
MrClassicDoctorWho 1 year ago
@MrClassicDoctorWho Who knows?!
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
"oops, there goes Alderaan"
Zebonka 1 year ago
Brilliant edit
SuperBrad5000 1 year ago
@SuperBrad5000 Thank you for your kind comment. Much appreciated.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
The first I saw of Doctor Who was the second Dalek movie with Peter Cushing. It was years before I saw the series over in the USA. It was with Tom Baker's "Robot" episode and I remember thinking there must be a lot more of this than I know about. Been a die hard fan every since. Seems you love him or hate him but he is one of the big 3 of all time! Doctor Who, Star Trek, and Star Wars!
Trekkienut4 1 year ago
@Trekkienut4 The films are a good introduction to the mythology of Doctor Who, including that of the series, strictly canonical or not. They are more accessible than the TV versions of the same stories. More than 40 years on, their legacy is shining through in the new (2005 - onwards) series.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago
Brilliant! Seems someone else can appreciate the old movies too. A lot of people seem to forget that the Daleks in these movies were different colors denoting rank. The new Daleks look great and I was a bit tired of the idea of contaminated Dalek DNA. The originals are back! Thanks for this video. I always love Peter Cushing!
Trekkienut4 1 year ago
@Trekkienut4 No problem, thanks for the comment. The Cushing Doctor and his movies (as well as the big, bright colourful Daleks) have a special place in my heart too! Mark Gatiss clearly feels the same. It is now not only cool to be a Doctor Who fan but, as a fan, it is now acceptable to like the Dr Who movies, canonical or not.
outofthegreenmist 1 year ago