Global Climate swings are happening but Humans have barely any fault in it.
It a normal, natural cycle that earth goes through, all this worrying and call to arm to impose stricter regulations, taxes and laws to raise MPG on cars, burning of fossils is just a way to make rich people richer.
What we should be fighting against is pollution, for more investment into renewable and alternative energy so we don.t have to burn coal.
From 1800s we are coming out of Little Ice Age, look a bigger picture.
Why answer the problem with technology? Consumerism, and ease of transition, because it's far easier to convince someone to switch from a gas car to hydrogen then to get them to get a bike or just walk. The debate is unfortunatly more politics than science, so you have to keep in mind appeal.
I would like to find whoever invented the term "global warming" and slap them across the face. What a ridiculous money-making scheme. And the term "climate change" means ABSOLUTLY NOTHING. "The climate changes". Actually, it's always changed and always will change. That differs from a claim of "global warming", which is also nonexistant. Show me the FACTS, not claims, and I'll believe; don't show me corrupt people who have completed no research to prove a theory.
you mean just the human inhabitants i take it, without natural predators herbivore populations swell until they are devasted by starvation once there are too many to feed, meat and plant eaters both have an important role in maintaining the balance of life and a functional eco-system... though i'll admit that humans do take meat eating to unnecessary places.
You know, part of me can't help but feel that the video views technology as the answer to everything. There's a gee wiz factor in there that's undeniably present. Part of the problem is that it reduces the question into one of consumer choice. Voting with your dollars means that those who benefit most from the system and who therefore have the least stake in changing it are the ones with the most votes.
Why is it that people tend to answer to the problem of global warming in terms of technology? For instance, people think of electric cars or biofuels as solutions to this problem. Problem is that one is still stuck within the car paradigm, and cars do a tremendous amount of damage prior to them being driven a single mile on the road.
@dnangeldragon What is your source of information? CBS News? Because I heard that around 1920 there was one of the warmest years. I also read that under pressure, NASA changed their data three times, finding that 2004 was the warmest year on record, not the early 1900's. Do you really believe in this hoax? I hope not!
but....the oil companies have extreme political power and influence...far beyond what we imagine. there greed will do more damage, because they want here mansions and their 55 cars just because.
@c4rv3r You're right! I, myself could have put together a random, innaccurate graph showing that '05 was the warmest year! This whole "global warming" thing boils down to one thing, COMMON SENSE. Obviously, you have it! Thank-you!
@Radibomb the title means a crisis averted IN 2006, not this video made in 2006. and also, if it was made in 2006, then how did they get a picture of mccain and obama at the presidential debate? I remember that picture in the newspaper describing the debate that took place in 2009
Global Climate swings are happening but Humans have barely any fault in it.
It a normal, natural cycle that earth goes through, all this worrying and call to arm to impose stricter regulations, taxes and laws to raise MPG on cars, burning of fossils is just a way to make rich people richer.
What we should be fighting against is pollution, for more investment into renewable and alternative energy so we don.t have to burn coal.
From 1800s we are coming out of Little Ice Age, look a bigger picture.
NIGHTMAREuki 11 months ago
Why answer the problem with technology? Consumerism, and ease of transition, because it's far easier to convince someone to switch from a gas car to hydrogen then to get them to get a bike or just walk. The debate is unfortunatly more politics than science, so you have to keep in mind appeal.
Asrugan 1 year ago
And it all came about with hipster internet greenery!
571jans 1 year ago
dont blame america,,,
it is all over the world
bestamerica 1 year ago
I would like to find whoever invented the term "global warming" and slap them across the face. What a ridiculous money-making scheme. And the term "climate change" means ABSOLUTLY NOTHING. "The climate changes". Actually, it's always changed and always will change. That differs from a claim of "global warming", which is also nonexistant. Show me the FACTS, not claims, and I'll believe; don't show me corrupt people who have completed no research to prove a theory.
evilportrait 1 year ago
The most important thing to save the earth and it's inhabitants is to stop eating meat.
natija08 2 years ago 2
it fine to eat meat but eat no-tutured meat like cow and pork ! because humain and animal ate meat in story on earth
js12352 2 years ago 2
you mean just the human inhabitants i take it, without natural predators herbivore populations swell until they are devasted by starvation once there are too many to feed, meat and plant eaters both have an important role in maintaining the balance of life and a functional eco-system... though i'll admit that humans do take meat eating to unnecessary places.
Uselesschris 2 years ago 2
You know, part of me can't help but feel that the video views technology as the answer to everything. There's a gee wiz factor in there that's undeniably present. Part of the problem is that it reduces the question into one of consumer choice. Voting with your dollars means that those who benefit most from the system and who therefore have the least stake in changing it are the ones with the most votes.
WitlessSod 2 years ago 3
do another grocery store wars!
georgewig 2 years ago
This is fantastic and what everyone really wants in the end.
I have been looking for an afordable home hydrogen fueling appliance for a converted natural gas truck
(Water electrolyzer) but only finding R&D outfits toying with the idea .
Unbelievable this late in the climate game but it's now my lifes mission.
brotherjupiter 2 years ago 2
Why is it that people tend to answer to the problem of global warming in terms of technology? For instance, people think of electric cars or biofuels as solutions to this problem. Problem is that one is still stuck within the car paradigm, and cars do a tremendous amount of damage prior to them being driven a single mile on the road.
WitlessSod 2 years ago
@WitlessSod Do you believe in "global warming", honestly?
evilportrait 1 year ago
5 warmest years ever to be recorded
Rank Year
1 2005
1 1998
3 2002
4 2003
5 2004
dnangeldragon 2 years ago
@dnangeldragon What is your source of information? CBS News? Because I heard that around 1920 there was one of the warmest years. I also read that under pressure, NASA changed their data three times, finding that 2004 was the warmest year on record, not the early 1900's. Do you really believe in this hoax? I hope not!
evilportrait 1 year ago
but....the oil companies have extreme political power and influence...far beyond what we imagine. there greed will do more damage, because they want here mansions and their 55 cars just because.
fenix611 2 years ago 3
Nonsense - 2005 WAS NOT THE WARMEST YEAR EVER...
c4rv3r 2 years ago
@c4rv3r You're right! I, myself could have put together a random, innaccurate graph showing that '05 was the warmest year! This whole "global warming" thing boils down to one thing, COMMON SENSE. Obviously, you have it! Thank-you!
evilportrait 1 year ago
Wow...but it didn't happen.This was made 2006.Now it's 2009 and still such ideas are barely present.
Radibomb 2 years ago 9
@Radibomb this was made last year, in 2009.
lolrofl1000 1 year ago
@lolrofl1000 the video was posted on youtube in 2009. FreeRangeStudios include the year of creation in the titles of most of their videos here.
Radibomb 1 year ago
@Radibomb the title means a crisis averted IN 2006, not this video made in 2006. and also, if it was made in 2006, then how did they get a picture of mccain and obama at the presidential debate? I remember that picture in the newspaper describing the debate that took place in 2009
lolrofl1000 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first
vilousas 2 years ago