I was not aware of this interpretation by van Oosten. (Saint-Ouen clearly recoginzable with its tierces on swell). BTW not bad, maybe a tad bit too "metronomic" , lacking expression in the great crescendo up to the end, but not bad... Thanks for posting.
@voixhumaine That said, his recordings remain useful when there are misprints in the score -- he would have done the necessary research to suggest reasonable corrections.
I was not aware of this interpretation by van Oosten. (Saint-Ouen clearly recoginzable with its tierces on swell). BTW not bad, maybe a tad bit too "metronomic" , lacking expression in the great crescendo up to the end, but not bad... Thanks for posting.
voixhumaine 9 months ago
@voixhumaine Ben van Oosten is only good for "academically-politically correct" interpretations. Full stop.
cliveso 5 months ago
@cliveso Result admitted without proof. Over.
voixhumaine 5 months ago
@voixhumaine That said, his recordings remain useful when there are misprints in the score -- he would have done the necessary research to suggest reasonable corrections.
cliveso 5 months ago
Wow!!! Love this piece, this organ, and this performance!
citzie 1 year ago 6
The Rouen C-C is the best in existance! Then St. Sulpice then the Madeleine.
DesireeDeFete 1 year ago 6