Willie stole the story of a true 9/11 hero, Pablo Ortiz, and made it his own. Mr. Ortiz rescued dozens of people by breaking down doors and clearing debris in the upper, damaged floors of the tower, and he died when the tower fell on him.
The people on Willie's floors lower down were not locked in, his claim that he saved hundreds is not corroborated by anyone, it's contradicted by death statistics, and it defies common sense.
@punxsutawneybarney And you know this how? Lol. One of 5 people with a master key. You really are that stupid if you expect us to believe your obvious disinformation campaign.
@res8898 Willie's story is identical to that of Pablo Ortiz, except in Mr. Ortiz's case the people were actually trapped behind jammed doors near the impact zone. He broke open the doors and let the people out and he saved dozens of lives and the people he rescued are willing to say so on TV.
In Willie's story he opened the doors with his magic Key of Hope, he saved hundreds, and not one person is willing to come forward and confirm it.
For those who don't know, "punxsutawneybarney" is an unemployed janitor named Brian Good who has been obsessively stalking Rodriguez for years. Rodriguez challenged him to a debate, and Good ran away squealing and crying. He's a coward who can't handle being challenged by the people he stalks.
Everything he says exactly corroborates the testimony from the other eyewitnesses. If anything there is absolutely no evidence to implicate foreign terrorists in 911. Look closer to the US. Maybe you could start with Marvin Bush and Securcom.
What he heard was "boom". The sort of explosions you hear when real explosives detonate, the kind that is able and used to break steal, don't go "boom", they sound sharper and MUCH MUCH louder (more like "PENG"). Just look at any video of real controlled detonations and notice how EXTREMELY loud these are, and how MANY of those are heard within seconds or a fraction of a second IMMEDIATELY before collaps starts. Any boom Rodriguez heard while inside was no demolition charge - he'd be dead.
@PapaOystein So, . . . your argument says that, were he asked: "Was your explosion EXTREMELY loud?", he'd say: "No-o-o, not really--just, boom."; or, what appearance of tortuous logic, allows you to, "Just look at any video of real controlled detonations . . . . ", and accurately apprehend relative volume--or, what do you say to the firemen who claim to have found evidence of, or smelled thermite--or, but for thermite, how do you explain hotspots over 2000 degrees, and lasting for 2 weeks?
@phillipgaley what would be the point of a detonation at 8:45 in the basement that is not even strong (loud) enough to injure Rodriguez' ears, when you want to demolish the tower from the top at 10:28? Any explosive charge that produces a shockwave strong enough to sever just one of the support columns would, by the very same token (shockwave) be loud enough to make everybody in the vicinity permanently deaf if not dead, and would be heard by EVERYBODY in southern Manhattan. (sound=shockwave)
@PapaOystein While I'm no kind of demolition expert, still and all, there does not a appear to have been a complete investigation, but only to bury and cover as quickly as possible, . . .
@phillipgaley This patently and grossly wrong. There has been an exceptionally large (tens of thousands involved) and long (many months) investigation, involving experts from many fields: engineers, fire fighting, demolition, etc etc. Every question to be had has been as thoroughly answered as can be hoped for given the devasation of the towers. Can you specify the question you want answeredm and why? No investigation has looked for signs of aliens, but there was no reason to.
I lived ONE BLOCK from Sander Hall, a 27 story dormitory located at UC campus in Cincinnati, imploded in 1991. I will tell you from first hand, the buildings collapse was MUCH louder than the explosions (mere thuds) that brought it down. There was no "shockwave". Although, the entire neighborhood and myself and all other witnesses were covered in about 2 to 4 inches of fine powdered ash, of which I was vividly reminded on 9-11. the video is on youtube.
@akl4130 Sander Hall? Watch v=V5wCl8SrHUI or v=-q08y6cFsTw and tell me the explosions were "mere thuds". Laughable! Why do truthers speak such obvious, easy to check falsehoods so often?
@PapaOystein Can you explain why, the pictures of other steel framed buildings, which were destroyed by fire--both riveted and welded--here, and in Europe--show the remaining frames still standing?
While as to "inside job", I know not, as in OKC--where failed bombs were found inside (How was Mcveigh able to affix the inside bombs?) for both places things appear as to hurry up and bury the thing--no real investigation, . . . and, do you not agree? But, at least we got the Patriot Act--ay?
@phillipgaley Like which other buliding? And what would that proof with regard to the WTC? Or to what Rodriguez claims? What do any whacko claims about OKC have to do with 9/11, logically? Aren't you moving goal posts here? Can we stick too the topic at hand and agree: Rodriguez' story does mean what he claims it means?
What does it matter what things APPEAR to you? To me, it appears like terrorists and planes and fires did it.
Patriot Act? Your fallacy is called "Prae hoc ergo propter hoc"
@PapaOystein Whether in Germany, or here, or South Am. nations, or elsewhere in other times, as in the Book of Daniel, the fact of augmentation to police powers upon agitation and foment is constitutive of textbook examples of things conjoined by time--"Prae hoc ergo propter hoc", notwithstanding. And, if you'll translate it, perhaps, I can assist you in better apprehending what you wish to show, . . . the mind which assumes that, others read latin exists in a basic sort of confusion, . . .
@phillipgaley Prae hoc etc: You falsely assume that because A preceded B, it happened because of B.
There is no doubt that the Bush administration abused the terror attacks to wage a dubious war in Irak. Maybe it was also just an excuse for the Patriot Act, although in this case I even think they enacted that in good faith, believing they did was necessary. I do not support either, but you can't conclude that 9/11 was orchestrated to pave the way for these government decisions. It's a fallacy.
@PapaOystein You mis-apprehend: administrative officers always act in good faith in that, they fully believe that, what they do is for an ultimate good; your "prae hoc etc." applies first to isolated occurrences, such that, because "this" precedes "that" is becoming of a lesser point of relationship. Scholars point to history in chain of events, administrative foment with provocateurs, manifests; and, in all ways conjoined in point of time with augmentation and concentration of the police power
@PapaOystein I stumbled across pictures of other burned steel framed buildings on YT--the WTC was steel framed, all things being equal, the frames should have remained; "whacko claims from on-scene news ppl about undetonated OKC bombs have to do with 9/11" upon the same logic that, the Reichstag fire is mentioned in context, and with that of one of the Roman Emperors who allowed the same, blaming fire on terrorists; in the grand scheme of things, nor does it matter how things APPEAR to me
@phillipgaley WHICH steel framed builing did you see burn and not collapse? Name one, please! Then we can discuss! Just because things have or have not happened in history doesn't make them a blueprint for today. Sure, a government COULD do such things, but there is absolutely no evidence for it, and very much against. (It is unclear to this day, by the way, if the Nazi government or party was actually behind the Reichtag fire, or whether they just seized on the opportunity)
@PapaOystein You greatly mis-apprehend the situation: I've NEVER seen a "steel framed builing (sic) burn and not collapse"; I said that, a YT vid showed pictures of the burned hulks of steel-framed buildings--both in the USA, and in Europe--and which left the steel frame yet standing.
The evidence for governmental employee involvement exists first, in an understanding of the administrative algorithm with the covalent paradigm from which administrative evil ensues, . . .
BP, what witnesses does Willie have? Who corroborates his testimony? No one. His story changed. He took the claim of 15 rescues down from his website after letting us tell the press about it for years.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
On 9/11 he told CNN that he heard a rumble, and then he heard another rumble, and then the burned man came in and everybody started screaming.
Now it's a "BOOM!" and everybody starts screaming and then the burned man comes in.
Willie's claims that he saved hundreds make no sense. They weren't locked in! Not one person has ever come forward to thank him for unlocking doors and saving lives.
do research to find out,and he did not save hundreds he saved 15-20 people,there s an interview where he visits the guy with the skin off in the hospital
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He claimed in his federal lawsuit that he single-handedly rescued 15 persons. For years he allowed 9/11 Truth activists to repeat these claims to the public and the press. Now he has removed the claim from his website, in effect admitting that he made liars of us all for years.
This has been flagged as spam show
willie the monkey could not run up a flight of stairs even if his fat ahole depended on it...
mcslowlife 6 months ago
5 people need to wake the FUCK UP
res8898 6 months ago
Willie stole the story of a true 9/11 hero, Pablo Ortiz, and made it his own. Mr. Ortiz rescued dozens of people by breaking down doors and clearing debris in the upper, damaged floors of the tower, and he died when the tower fell on him.
The people on Willie's floors lower down were not locked in, his claim that he saved hundreds is not corroborated by anyone, it's contradicted by death statistics, and it defies common sense.
punxsutawneybarney 9 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney And you know this how? Lol. One of 5 people with a master key. You really are that stupid if you expect us to believe your obvious disinformation campaign.
res8898 6 months ago
@res8898 Willie's story is identical to that of Pablo Ortiz, except in Mr. Ortiz's case the people were actually trapped behind jammed doors near the impact zone. He broke open the doors and let the people out and he saved dozens of lives and the people he rescued are willing to say so on TV.
In Willie's story he opened the doors with his magic Key of Hope, he saved hundreds, and not one person is willing to come forward and confirm it.
punxsutawneybarney 6 months ago
@punxsutawneybarney
For those who don't know, "punxsutawneybarney" is an unemployed janitor named Brian Good who has been obsessively stalking Rodriguez for years. Rodriguez challenged him to a debate, and Good ran away squealing and crying. He's a coward who can't handle being challenged by the people he stalks.
ianat841 3 months ago
google: Host Debate Between Brian Good and Willie Rodriguez
you will find out who punsuxtawneybarney ,Truetruther and Brian good (the same ) really are. See how he rans away from facing Rodriguez.
Badilloandfam 9 months ago
Also, for more on "punxsutawneybarney" and who he is, google "Brian Good sex stalker"
ianat841 1 year ago
This video has had 300 views in the last 10 weeks. We should all care about Willie Rodriguez's con job that discredited the truth movement.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
For more on William Rodriguez and his literally incredible hero tales, see my video "The Wrong Man"
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
@punxsutawneybarney
Nobody cares about Willie Rodriguez, Brian.
ianat841 1 year ago
Everything he says exactly corroborates the testimony from the other eyewitnesses. If anything there is absolutely no evidence to implicate foreign terrorists in 911. Look closer to the US. Maybe you could start with Marvin Bush and Securcom.
damienrockaterror 1 year ago
What he heard was "boom". The sort of explosions you hear when real explosives detonate, the kind that is able and used to break steal, don't go "boom", they sound sharper and MUCH MUCH louder (more like "PENG"). Just look at any video of real controlled detonations and notice how EXTREMELY loud these are, and how MANY of those are heard within seconds or a fraction of a second IMMEDIATELY before collaps starts. Any boom Rodriguez heard while inside was no demolition charge - he'd be dead.
PapaOystein 2 years ago
@PapaOystein So, . . . your argument says that, were he asked: "Was your explosion EXTREMELY loud?", he'd say: "No-o-o, not really--just, boom."; or, what appearance of tortuous logic, allows you to, "Just look at any video of real controlled detonations . . . . ", and accurately apprehend relative volume--or, what do you say to the firemen who claim to have found evidence of, or smelled thermite--or, but for thermite, how do you explain hotspots over 2000 degrees, and lasting for 2 weeks?
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@phillipgaley what would be the point of a detonation at 8:45 in the basement that is not even strong (loud) enough to injure Rodriguez' ears, when you want to demolish the tower from the top at 10:28? Any explosive charge that produces a shockwave strong enough to sever just one of the support columns would, by the very same token (shockwave) be loud enough to make everybody in the vicinity permanently deaf if not dead, and would be heard by EVERYBODY in southern Manhattan. (sound=shockwave)
PapaOystein 1 year ago
@PapaOystein While I'm no kind of demolition expert, still and all, there does not a appear to have been a complete investigation, but only to bury and cover as quickly as possible, . . .
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@phillipgaley This patently and grossly wrong. There has been an exceptionally large (tens of thousands involved) and long (many months) investigation, involving experts from many fields: engineers, fire fighting, demolition, etc etc. Every question to be had has been as thoroughly answered as can be hoped for given the devasation of the towers. Can you specify the question you want answeredm and why? No investigation has looked for signs of aliens, but there was no reason to.
PapaOystein 1 year ago
@PapaOystein
I lived ONE BLOCK from Sander Hall, a 27 story dormitory located at UC campus in Cincinnati, imploded in 1991. I will tell you from first hand, the buildings collapse was MUCH louder than the explosions (mere thuds) that brought it down. There was no "shockwave". Although, the entire neighborhood and myself and all other witnesses were covered in about 2 to 4 inches of fine powdered ash, of which I was vividly reminded on 9-11. the video is on youtube.
akl4130 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@akl4130 Sander Hall? Watch v=V5wCl8SrHUI or v=-q08y6cFsTw and tell me the explosions were "mere thuds". Laughable! Why do truthers speak such obvious, easy to check falsehoods so often?
PapaOystein 6 months ago
@PapaOystein Can you explain why, the pictures of other steel framed buildings, which were destroyed by fire--both riveted and welded--here, and in Europe--show the remaining frames still standing?
While as to "inside job", I know not, as in OKC--where failed bombs were found inside (How was Mcveigh able to affix the inside bombs?) for both places things appear as to hurry up and bury the thing--no real investigation, . . . and, do you not agree? But, at least we got the Patriot Act--ay?
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@phillipgaley Like which other buliding? And what would that proof with regard to the WTC? Or to what Rodriguez claims? What do any whacko claims about OKC have to do with 9/11, logically? Aren't you moving goal posts here? Can we stick too the topic at hand and agree: Rodriguez' story does mean what he claims it means?
What does it matter what things APPEAR to you? To me, it appears like terrorists and planes and fires did it.
Patriot Act? Your fallacy is called "Prae hoc ergo propter hoc"
PapaOystein 1 year ago
@PapaOystein Whether in Germany, or here, or South Am. nations, or elsewhere in other times, as in the Book of Daniel, the fact of augmentation to police powers upon agitation and foment is constitutive of textbook examples of things conjoined by time--"Prae hoc ergo propter hoc", notwithstanding. And, if you'll translate it, perhaps, I can assist you in better apprehending what you wish to show, . . . the mind which assumes that, others read latin exists in a basic sort of confusion, . . .
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@phillipgaley Prae hoc etc: You falsely assume that because A preceded B, it happened because of B.
There is no doubt that the Bush administration abused the terror attacks to wage a dubious war in Irak. Maybe it was also just an excuse for the Patriot Act, although in this case I even think they enacted that in good faith, believing they did was necessary. I do not support either, but you can't conclude that 9/11 was orchestrated to pave the way for these government decisions. It's a fallacy.
PapaOystein 1 year ago
@PapaOystein You mis-apprehend: administrative officers always act in good faith in that, they fully believe that, what they do is for an ultimate good; your "prae hoc etc." applies first to isolated occurrences, such that, because "this" precedes "that" is becoming of a lesser point of relationship. Scholars point to history in chain of events, administrative foment with provocateurs, manifests; and, in all ways conjoined in point of time with augmentation and concentration of the police power
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@PapaOystein I stumbled across pictures of other burned steel framed buildings on YT--the WTC was steel framed, all things being equal, the frames should have remained; "whacko claims from on-scene news ppl about undetonated OKC bombs have to do with 9/11" upon the same logic that, the Reichstag fire is mentioned in context, and with that of one of the Roman Emperors who allowed the same, blaming fire on terrorists; in the grand scheme of things, nor does it matter how things APPEAR to me
phillipgaley 1 year ago
@phillipgaley WHICH steel framed builing did you see burn and not collapse? Name one, please! Then we can discuss! Just because things have or have not happened in history doesn't make them a blueprint for today. Sure, a government COULD do such things, but there is absolutely no evidence for it, and very much against. (It is unclear to this day, by the way, if the Nazi government or party was actually behind the Reichtag fire, or whether they just seized on the opportunity)
PapaOystein 1 year ago
@PapaOystein You greatly mis-apprehend the situation: I've NEVER seen a "steel framed builing (sic) burn and not collapse"; I said that, a YT vid showed pictures of the burned hulks of steel-framed buildings--both in the USA, and in Europe--and which left the steel frame yet standing.
The evidence for governmental employee involvement exists first, in an understanding of the administrative algorithm with the covalent paradigm from which administrative evil ensues, . . .
phillipgaley 1 year ago
No plane plus LOUD explosion equals CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, eualls INSIDE JOB.
lennhart 2 years ago
well, all I can say IS, Hi, CIA we are coming for our country back...
willie has witnesses and they collaborate his testimony... no start the trials of the guilty
BornPatriot 2 years ago 2
BP, what witnesses does Willie have? Who corroborates his testimony? No one. His story changed. He took the claim of 15 rescues down from his website after letting us tell the press about it for years.
punxsutawneybarney 2 years ago
Why they keep deleting this video?
andJust1ceForAll 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
On 9/11 he told CNN that he heard a rumble, and then he heard another rumble, and then the burned man came in and everybody started screaming.
Now it's a "BOOM!" and everybody starts screaming and then the burned man comes in.
Willie's claims that he saved hundreds make no sense. They weren't locked in! Not one person has ever come forward to thank him for unlocking doors and saving lives.
punxsutawneybarney 3 years ago
do research to find out,and he did not save hundreds he saved 15-20 people,there s an interview where he visits the guy with the skin off in the hospital
skaterride2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He claimed in his federal lawsuit that he single-handedly rescued 15 persons. For years he allowed 9/11 Truth activists to repeat these claims to the public and the press. Now he has removed the claim from his website, in effect admitting that he made liars of us all for years.
punxsutawneybarney 3 years ago