"its an american wedding they dont mean so much but we where so in love but its an american wedding now whats mine is yours american divorce" its true allot of people get married just for awhile having fun with love but than its always a divorce in the end.
@yasira28 /Why so angry? Any chance you can class-it-up yourself a little? You see, while you're sitting there telling people to grow-up, you don't seem to really understand what a cover is. Sure, there's quite a lot that an artist can do with someone's song (after he gets the rights, the permission and the original artist gets paid which isn't the case here). Changing the lyrics and pretending it's your song is not a "cover". The performance, the song itself, all good. Stealing, not good.
And let us not forget, The Eagles ripped off Hotel California off of Jethro Tull's 1969 song We Used To Know on the Stand Up album. So all the ignorant Eagles fans need to brush up on their music knowledge before bashing a new artist for doing something The Eagles did to begin with.
I hate it when artists think they can just "sample" someone else's work, either in part or whole like this one and think it is O.K.
Google this: "The Eagles consider legal action against Frank Ocean."
The article states, "Frank Ocean did not merely "sample" a portion of the Eagles' Hotel California; he took the whole master track, plus the song's existing melody, and replaced the lyrics with his own. This is not creative, let alone "intimidating." It's illegal."
@CasuallyObservant Frank Ocean's response: "They also asked that I release a statement expressing my admiration for Mr. Henley, along with my assistance pulling it off the web as much as possible. Shit’s weird. Ain’t this guy rich as fuck? Why sue the new guy? I didn’t make a dime off that song. I released it for free. If anything I’m paying homage."
@billsfan45 - Yes, that was his response. It doesn't make it any less legal. Here is another example of blatant illegal behavior: my daughter received a book that her uncle gave her and said his friend wrote. She started to read it and said, this book is exactly like another book I just read. We compared them side-by-side and it turns out this fellow took another author's books and rewrote them almost exactly, but with a different title and his name as author. He "self published"...
...(cont.) and claimed all of his books "came to him in a dream". We contacted the original publisher of the classic books he stole from and let them deal with his theft. There are all kinds of laws governing this stuff. Surely Frank Ocean can't expect us to buy his lame excuse that the original artist is "rich", so therefore why not steal his work! And why indeed "sue the new guy"? Because he is a thief, that's why. Homage my a**.
@CasuallyObservant Come on though, Frank is a new artist and also a fan and decided to make a cover of the song to add to his completely FREE mixtape. Don Henley already took down all the vids and the song from his mixtape, why sue the guy?
@billsfan45 There is a protocol required if you want to do a cover of someone's song and post it where it can be listened to publicly. Shoot, if you even want to play an old movie for free to an audience of school kids, or if you want to use a song in a high school play, you have to receive permission and pay licensing fees through ASCAP. Frank's blatant public posting on YouTube without following the laws and licensing rights was just asking for trouble. Duh!
Actually no. He did not release his version on iTunes nor on the record store shelves so he is not making any money off it. Therefore he does not need to ask any permission and/or license. Frank actually sings beautifully on this, I am not downplaying The Eagles' impact on music but the singing is not on par with Frank's. The Eagles should be happy with this version, because of it a lot of kids know them. Suing a new artist to finally get media attention again is just sad.
i can't believe this is what music is coming to... using great songs and changing the words... where has al the talent gone, we can't have used up the worlds share of creative talent in the 50's 60's 70's and 90's, it must be hiding...
@vbo1 /It's not always about hating. Watch FoxNews. That's hating. This is called "having an opinion". Forgive me, but to reduce a strong reaction against artists taking the work of another and just making up new words for their own as "hating" is over-simplyfing. Yes, we get it (most of us), Frank Ocean is calling this a mix-tape, not to be released commercially. But his comments to the Eagles that they're intimidated by him (as if) is simply arrogant. All he had to do was BE NICE about it.
There's "paying homage" to another artists song by sampling part of it. Then there's stealing the entire melody and chord structure and just adding your own words. This is flat-out stealing. This takes it to another level. Why can't artists just write their own original material anymore. Lawsuit on isle one.
And when The Beatles sang Besame Mucho they were doing what? When Michael Jackson sang Come Together by The Beatles what was he doing? This is just old folk getting upset because music has moved forward since their favorite bands ran the industry who are not relevant anymore. Do not hate on a new (very promising) singer, who will most likely put out the album of the year just because he made a cover of Hotel California.
@Fredtheproducer / Why do people keep taking about hate? Jeez, this is not about hating on anybody (to use the street term). This is about having an honest and fair opinion in opposition to theft. Your example is not good. Try a different one. Beatles doing "Besame Mucho" is a COVER. MJ doing "Come Together" is a COVER. The performer asks permission, the artist gets paid and everyone's happy. This is stealing the entire song, making up your own words and calling it yours. Think it through.
Think it through yourself sir, you are saying Frank used the same vocal melody, what did The Eagles do with Hotel California? They used the same vocal melody of Jethro Tull's 1969 song We Used To Know so The Eagles are talking about lawsuits over a song that is not even original itself.
@Fredtheproducer / Look, you probably really like this song enough to defend it intensely. If you can defend this with the justification that The Eagles used some of the chord structure and melody from Tull's "We Used to Know", fine. But I'm familiar with both songs. IMO, they are significantly different enough to be two unique songs. For me, this one is stealing. But we've both had our say. I think that the theft here is obvious, way beyond your Tull argument but you see it differently. Peace.
Well, IMO making a song better with great lyrics and even better singing is not theft BUT if you must call it that, it is a beautiful theft, like Ocean's Eleven. And you are correct about my admiration for Frank's version, I love it very much indeed and it really connects with me and after all thats the most important thing in music.
I do ask you to do me one favor even if you do not know me, when Frank's debut is released, give it a listen. I am sure it will not disappoint.
iFound this song doing my chorus homework. . . o.o They're right, its copying the Eagles with the melody and music patterns. . . Thats sad. . . .Smh. People please make up your own types of songs and melodies =/
@strtthshw So knowing who The Eagles are makes a person musically superior to someone who listens to odd future/frank ocean? Everyone and their 5 year old children know the original. I don't really know what point you're trying to make with me. The original will go down as one of the all time great guitar songs. What makes Frank's better? Modern lyricism and a slight melody change? Get over yourself.
Someone wrote that she is just good looking and couldnt sing. . .well as far as I can hear, she is doing pretty well! I really like her voice and creativity!
@TheJokerBones I'M being pretentious? And all of the "Omgz the Eagles did it better because they did it first and because they were around decades before I was born and I just want to seem musically superior by name dropping them" prepubescent pressed little shits aren't? I agreed with someone ELSE that Hotel California is the inferior song. I guess you tried, though.
Guys, I know prob no one will put a thumbs up.. and you are probably sick of these comments.. but my dream is to follow a future in music!!! I need everyone to go check out my covers and give me feedback for me to improve :) PLEASEE THUMBS UP :) wish me good luck hehe xx
@joixxxx frank ocean wrote "american wedding" over the hotel california instrumental, he also re-did strawberry swing which is absolutely amazing, "nostalgia,ultra" was too sick
fuck the eagles, this is franks song now bitches... great cover yasmin
j1muzic 2 days ago
"its an american wedding they dont mean so much but we where so in love but its an american wedding now whats mine is yours american divorce" its true allot of people get married just for awhile having fun with love but than its always a divorce in the end.
iJKiNG18 2 days ago
The point is to do a good version and i think it is. Maybe she should have sung it with the original lyrics. Great voice
marcelodiazg 3 days ago
Comment removed
marcelodiazg 3 days ago
Its a horrible copy, of an even more horrible copy of a classic... why would anyone wanna destroy a classic like that?
atllmand 3 days ago
@atllmand grow the fuck up!!! There is a reason why its called cover.
yasira28 3 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
@yasira28 /Why so angry? Any chance you can class-it-up yourself a little? You see, while you're sitting there telling people to grow-up, you don't seem to really understand what a cover is. Sure, there's quite a lot that an artist can do with someone's song (after he gets the rights, the permission and the original artist gets paid which isn't the case here). Changing the lyrics and pretending it's your song is not a "cover". The performance, the song itself, all good. Stealing, not good.
jakeslatnesky 2 days ago
@yasira28 And what is that reason, sweetheart?
atllmand 2 days ago
way to destroy a classic
anonymoushero5 3 days ago
delete this video, the eagles is pissed off!
theguys90 4 days ago
@theguys90 / Jeez, I HATE being the grammar police but don't you mean: "The eagles am pissed off?"
jakeslatnesky 2 days ago
@jakeslatnesky The Eagles ARE...
esthertai24 2 days ago
@esthertai24 /nope. Still not right. The Eagles "is be" Angry. (did the sarcasm not come through? I thought it was funny. Oh well..)
jakeslatnesky 1 day ago
@jakeslatnesky shure, but whatever, they are pissed anyways! fuck this shit.. and modern music
theguys90 22 hours ago
I LIKE <3 thumbs up for you my dear. good voise<3
Jjs030793 4 days ago
Lol your name is birthcontrol.
lonebard 5 days ago
why are you ppl talking about things other than how awsome this song sounds?
Ap0LL0LFA 1 week ago 2
@Ap0LL0LFA , you are adorable in your innocence.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago
@jakeslatnesky meh i try, though this was a once off
Ap0LL0LFA 6 days ago
And let us not forget, The Eagles ripped off Hotel California off of Jethro Tull's 1969 song We Used To Know on the Stand Up album. So all the ignorant Eagles fans need to brush up on their music knowledge before bashing a new artist for doing something The Eagles did to begin with.
Fredtheproducer 1 week ago
Where is the real song!???
weezyfan25 1 week ago
She just took a shit on an actual good artist.
xXShigofumiXx 1 week ago
She could have just done a cover of it instead of completely ripping it off.
mmmmmvodka 1 week ago
Yep Hotel Cal. rip.
2020pfw 1 week ago
WHAT A RIP OFF!
I hate it when artists think they can just "sample" someone else's work, either in part or whole like this one and think it is O.K.
Google this: "The Eagles consider legal action against Frank Ocean."
The article states, "Frank Ocean did not merely "sample" a portion of the Eagles' Hotel California; he took the whole master track, plus the song's existing melody, and replaced the lyrics with his own. This is not creative, let alone "intimidating." It's illegal."
CasuallyObservant 1 week ago
@CasuallyObservant Frank Ocean's response: "They also asked that I release a statement expressing my admiration for Mr. Henley, along with my assistance pulling it off the web as much as possible. Shit’s weird. Ain’t this guy rich as fuck? Why sue the new guy? I didn’t make a dime off that song. I released it for free. If anything I’m paying homage."
billsfan45 1 week ago
@billsfan45 - Yes, that was his response. It doesn't make it any less legal. Here is another example of blatant illegal behavior: my daughter received a book that her uncle gave her and said his friend wrote. She started to read it and said, this book is exactly like another book I just read. We compared them side-by-side and it turns out this fellow took another author's books and rewrote them almost exactly, but with a different title and his name as author. He "self published"...
CasuallyObservant 1 week ago
...(cont.) and claimed all of his books "came to him in a dream". We contacted the original publisher of the classic books he stole from and let them deal with his theft. There are all kinds of laws governing this stuff. Surely Frank Ocean can't expect us to buy his lame excuse that the original artist is "rich", so therefore why not steal his work! And why indeed "sue the new guy"? Because he is a thief, that's why. Homage my a**.
CasuallyObservant 1 week ago
@CasuallyObservant Come on though, Frank is a new artist and also a fan and decided to make a cover of the song to add to his completely FREE mixtape. Don Henley already took down all the vids and the song from his mixtape, why sue the guy?
billsfan45 1 week ago
@billsfan45 There is a protocol required if you want to do a cover of someone's song and post it where it can be listened to publicly. Shoot, if you even want to play an old movie for free to an audience of school kids, or if you want to use a song in a high school play, you have to receive permission and pay licensing fees through ASCAP. Frank's blatant public posting on YouTube without following the laws and licensing rights was just asking for trouble. Duh!
CasuallyObservant 1 week ago
@CasuallyObservant
Actually no. He did not release his version on iTunes nor on the record store shelves so he is not making any money off it. Therefore he does not need to ask any permission and/or license. Frank actually sings beautifully on this, I am not downplaying The Eagles' impact on music but the singing is not on par with Frank's. The Eagles should be happy with this version, because of it a lot of kids know them. Suing a new artist to finally get media attention again is just sad.
Fredtheproducer 1 week ago
love love love love love <3
TinooKyubi 1 week ago
change the title to ''yasmin hotel california cover.
RickyRocker821 1 week ago
stolen from the eagles
RickyRocker821 1 week ago
i can't believe this is what music is coming to... using great songs and changing the words... where has al the talent gone, we can't have used up the worlds share of creative talent in the 50's 60's 70's and 90's, it must be hiding...
slashedmckagan 1 week ago
@slashedmckagan hush
Vybes4You 1 week ago
damn you guys are really hating hard. it's a mixtape and there's actually a great meaning to it if you would open your ears. k thx
vbo1 1 week ago
@vbo1 /It's not always about hating. Watch FoxNews. That's hating. This is called "having an opinion". Forgive me, but to reduce a strong reaction against artists taking the work of another and just making up new words for their own as "hating" is over-simplyfing. Yes, we get it (most of us), Frank Ocean is calling this a mix-tape, not to be released commercially. But his comments to the Eagles that they're intimidated by him (as if) is simply arrogant. All he had to do was BE NICE about it.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago
Nice voice but... please don't shit on the Eagles.
ole9421 1 week ago
There's "paying homage" to another artists song by sampling part of it. Then there's stealing the entire melody and chord structure and just adding your own words. This is flat-out stealing. This takes it to another level. Why can't artists just write their own original material anymore. Lawsuit on isle one.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago 2
@jakeslatnesky
And when The Beatles sang Besame Mucho they were doing what? When Michael Jackson sang Come Together by The Beatles what was he doing? This is just old folk getting upset because music has moved forward since their favorite bands ran the industry who are not relevant anymore. Do not hate on a new (very promising) singer, who will most likely put out the album of the year just because he made a cover of Hotel California.
Fredtheproducer 1 week ago
@Fredtheproducer / Why do people keep taking about hate? Jeez, this is not about hating on anybody (to use the street term). This is about having an honest and fair opinion in opposition to theft. Your example is not good. Try a different one. Beatles doing "Besame Mucho" is a COVER. MJ doing "Come Together" is a COVER. The performer asks permission, the artist gets paid and everyone's happy. This is stealing the entire song, making up your own words and calling it yours. Think it through.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago
@jakeslatnesky
Think it through yourself sir, you are saying Frank used the same vocal melody, what did The Eagles do with Hotel California? They used the same vocal melody of Jethro Tull's 1969 song We Used To Know so The Eagles are talking about lawsuits over a song that is not even original itself.
Fredtheproducer 1 week ago
@Fredtheproducer / Look, you probably really like this song enough to defend it intensely. If you can defend this with the justification that The Eagles used some of the chord structure and melody from Tull's "We Used to Know", fine. But I'm familiar with both songs. IMO, they are significantly different enough to be two unique songs. For me, this one is stealing. But we've both had our say. I think that the theft here is obvious, way beyond your Tull argument but you see it differently. Peace.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago
@jakeslatnesky
Well, IMO making a song better with great lyrics and even better singing is not theft BUT if you must call it that, it is a beautiful theft, like Ocean's Eleven. And you are correct about my admiration for Frank's version, I love it very much indeed and it really connects with me and after all thats the most important thing in music.
I do ask you to do me one favor even if you do not know me, when Frank's debut is released, give it a listen. I am sure it will not disappoint.
Fredtheproducer 6 days ago
pretty bad when you cant make your own lyrics you have to steal from one of the great bands of the past, then you even kill the lyrics at that.
bjohnson763 1 week ago
Wow complete rip off of american legend eagles...
TheTipsterOfFate 1 week ago
You fag piece of shit don't rip off americas great songs with your rap smut suck dick frank ocean
ffokcuf1011 1 week ago
@ffokcuf1011 /Ok. I agree completely. But nobody says it as classy as you do.
jakeslatnesky 1 week ago
Frank Ocean shits on Don Henley...old dusty puss
adrianlujano3160 1 week ago
wow what is this rip off garbage! i like frank ocean but what the fuck, this is too far. fuck this shit
MrBurgundy76 1 week ago 2
iFound this song doing my chorus homework. . . o.o They're right, its copying the Eagles with the melody and music patterns. . . Thats sad. . . .Smh. People please make up your own types of songs and melodies =/
~MockingJay
TeamGale4281 1 week ago
@TeamGale4281 .... and Eagles copied Jethro Tull- We Used To Know - just listen that song to compare.
Aa1Mar 1 week ago
@Aa1Mar - Still :/ iPerfer The Eagles <3
~MockingJay
TeamGale4281 1 week ago
@strtthshw So knowing who The Eagles are makes a person musically superior to someone who listens to odd future/frank ocean? Everyone and their 5 year old children know the original. I don't really know what point you're trying to make with me. The original will go down as one of the all time great guitar songs. What makes Frank's better? Modern lyricism and a slight melody change? Get over yourself.
TheJokerBones 1 week ago
she blows
occupytosavetheworld 1 week ago
god your amazing
BlackRedK 1 week ago
Someone wrote that she is just good looking and couldnt sing. . .well as far as I can hear, she is doing pretty well! I really like her voice and creativity!
Donstefanaki 1 week ago
BIG LIKE !
blejDrv 2 weeks ago
Such a beautiful voice
CelosTV 2 weeks ago
i love her voice..but i don't like the songs she's makin right now..
she's got a bit of 'a fuck you' attitude... i wish she would make more songs like on my own..
but it's her life ..so i wish her goood luck anyway♥
RoseLilyPink 3 weeks ago
Best song ever.
tuchesuavae 3 weeks ago
Frank Ocean didn't sing "Hotel California" it was The Eagles... Regladless of that, "American Wedding" is better than the original.
LinOfficial 3 weeks ago
@LinOfficial It really is. Eagles fans need to get over it.
strtthshw 1 week ago
@strtthshw There's no way in hell its better than the original
Bluebird9021 1 week ago
@Bluebird9021 It is. Hotel California is overrated and you will deal.
strtthshw 1 week ago
@strtthshw No it's not. And I fucking hate The Eagles. And love OF. Don't be a pretentious prick.
TheJokerBones 1 week ago
@TheJokerBones I'M being pretentious? And all of the "Omgz the Eagles did it better because they did it first and because they were around decades before I was born and I just want to seem musically superior by name dropping them" prepubescent pressed little shits aren't? I agreed with someone ELSE that Hotel California is the inferior song. I guess you tried, though.
strtthshw 1 week ago
@LinOfficial You're smoking some bad shit.
ucladodgerdog 1 week ago
I fee that you shouldn't have left the line "they don't last enough" in the last hook. But well done. :)
jimjamLUU 3 weeks ago
i like!
Mobz601 1 month ago
Yep... instant recognition: Hotel California in a new coat (Dutch expression)
scadman33 1 month ago
nice
318SHORTT 1 month ago
Wow such a beautiful voice from a beautiful girl, thumbs up if you agree
playuppompey23 1 month ago
Yasmin killed this as a cover. I can listen to this cover for hours! She's very talented! :D
Like if you enjoy this better than Frank Ocean's version. ;)
DeeLishess757 1 month ago
I love this so much. It has been a long time someone gave me the chills through music.
Eredhell 1 month ago
it is Hotel California, just frank ocean made his own version to it
IfYouSeekEvery1 1 month ago
c mon, thats hotel california!
yoshuaXx10 1 month ago
@yoshuaXx10 She is covering Frank Ocean's version of "Hotel California".
LAEmonade 1 month ago
Guys, I know prob no one will put a thumbs up.. and you are probably sick of these comments.. but my dream is to follow a future in music!!! I need everyone to go check out my covers and give me feedback for me to improve :) PLEASEE THUMBS UP :) wish me good luck hehe xx
matildecv 1 month ago
Yeah ¡¡
Pablolopezluque 1 month ago
This is probably my new benchmark for recordings like this, absolutely love it
andyland1349 1 month ago
Just love it!
dmillward100 1 month ago
she is such a princess
muntrup 1 month ago
Woah just got chills
EhLambair 1 month ago
could be this generations, Hotel California...love the singer, lost in the words. Wait, that is what is supposed to happen.
tonytube050267 1 month ago
Comment removed
tonytube050267 1 month ago
i like her drum n bass tracks but this is just gorgeous and elegant.
piaoro 1 month ago
I think i listen to this song at least 10 times a day...i wish i lived in the UK so i could see her perform!
Limzxkoy83 1 month ago
simply loving it .... :X
inipingugirl 2 months ago
I DONT THINK SHE DONE THIS JUSTICE AT ALL.... love ur other music though
johahngreen 2 months ago
vocals are beautiful but i wished they kept the original guitar tabs
mizsay 2 months ago
I like that she pronounced Hijabs in the right way , Her vocals are Beautiful !!!
AyzeeHausawi 2 months ago
Amazing talent and beauty... i may fall in love lol
MissTinyS 2 months ago
Yasmin is sick man!
MissTinyS 2 months ago
this is tremendous. well done yasmin!
rjohnso01 2 months ago
I love her
ffelipebrsp 2 months ago
Sounds of hotel california in there. An absolute melody, a successful one too.
mmmfahh 2 months ago 2
hmmmmmm ''hotel california''
joixxxx 2 months ago 48
@joixxxx frank ocean wrote "american wedding" over the hotel california instrumental, he also re-did strawberry swing which is absolutely amazing, "nostalgia,ultra" was too sick
bigsoso20 2 months ago
@joixxxx nothing wrong with a sample as long as you do it justice... which this does.
muntrup 2 months ago
her vocals are incredible...feels good to hear some raw quality in this world of fake voice effects
tubeoful 2 months ago
WAOW.
jordan32none 2 months ago
her vocals are ON POINT ! WOW
bradfosterofficial 2 months ago
awesome
jober0cks 2 months ago
"This video is unlisted. Only those with the link can see it." True fans
Zima143 2 months ago 34
I love this so much.
smallperson91 2 months ago
This song is perfect for you! And the messy bun is back <3
Ewelina93xo 2 months ago
Brilliant. Need a Yasmin & Frank Ocean duet.
nahimgood 2 months ago
Soooo good.
cazclayton 2 months ago