Hey, you might get better ratings on your video if you didn't use profanity. I also feel that you video was interesting, but it wasn't structured or presented in a way that would make people want to watch all of it. Most would be offset by the seemingly rude and subjective connotations of your initial text. Only one who kept watching would see that these things are the same for the presentation of Tibet's reasons. thanks for making the video
chinese always a threat of peace in asiA.... they also claiming da whole south china sea as part of there territory as a whole chines property whch is illegal thats da reason why ther is always hot tensions between ASEAN MEMBERS VERSUS CHINA especially da disputed island spratly island...china have no rights over spratly as da map proves that only vietnam and philippines do have da rights to claim coz its closer to them not china.
unless the truth is out about how the invasion is linked to the nazi occult connections, this - like all related conflicts - it's just going to drag out forever. it's a spiritual war.
A more important and relevant question is why Tibet's legal status need to be settled internationally when it was settled 60 years ago peacefully between Tibet and China where both have benefitted from such economic and political union or that Tibet has to be "'independent"' or "'Freed"' by the West when the 56 nationalities, including Tibetans, that have democratized and built and lifted Tibet out of social/religious inequalities, poverty, and illiteracy couldn't manage more of the same?
Moreover, if the video argues that Tibetans are Mongolian and Qing (not Chinese or Han Chinese) and even Swiss, Americans, Canadians, and British is rational and leagl with emotioanl and intellectual honesty, then the Tibetans certainly can be Chinese (and have alreday fought for some 59 years ago), especially since there are multiple historical ethnic and religious groups under the Chinese Empire (like all empires) other than Han Chinese and 56 nationalities as defined by the PRC.
The upside down irrational logic of this video might as well be used to defend the military occupation of Hawaii, the Confederate States of America, 26 Cantons of Switzerland, the four countries of Great Britain, and other American occupied overseas military bases with the exception that the Tibetan governm't accepted a legal BILATERALLY negotiated peace agreement with China (hence can't be illegal military occupation) for 8 YEARS to be the beneficiary of a unified China.
5:48.. china did not invade the philippines..although the naval military presence of china in spratlys and kalayaan islands is a direct threat to philippines sovereignty...
That's the problem. Tibetans are not Chinese enough which is why Qing dynasty failed at incorporating Tibet into the Chinese empire.
You have to make them more Chinese or else if your nation fragments (as China did in WW2), Tibet will declare defacto independence. You have to make the Tibetans more Chinese.... duh.
you shouldnt make a movie called "EVERYTHING you need to know about tibet-china conflict" if your view is clearly subjective. that just shows how wrong you are.
and this moderator, like the tibet guy, equate chinese with Han, which leaves the other ethics in China nowhere.
Believe it or not, to many Chinese "chinese" is a similar idea as Canadian. and to say Mongol Yuan dynasty or Manchu Qing dynasty is not China is a joke too, keep in mind that those Emprerors sinicized themselves to a large degree.
2) Many other ethnics in China have very distinguished culture too (like Manchus, Mongols, Miaos, etc) and according to him these people all should get a piece of China of their own.
3) according to this logic should all Chinese in Canada crave a piece out of Canada because Chinese have very different "language, letter, culture, religion" from the rest of the Canadians?
I'm Hmong, or Miao if you would like to say. I've never asked myself if my people should have a country.
Well first off, even though Chinese Canadians have very difference language, letter, culture and religion fro the rest of Cdns, they still have a country called China. Tibetans have no country, as well as the Mongols, Hmong, and Manchus.
So, would it be reasonable to give them a home? And there's a difference, Canadians didn't kill and chase after CHinese people like China did Hmong.
their "fact" 1 and 2 are same, about language. fact 3 about "culture", which sort of includes language, and fact 4 about "religion" which is still culture. anyways, it's naive to use such things to argue because
1) the person already assumes that "chinese" = Han and exclude Tibetan and other 54 ethnics in China,
中国人的智慧:话说天下事,合久必分,分久必合。 To be honest with you, the China today is so powerful that it is definitely hard for Tibetans to seperate it. Dalai Lama knows it but he wants to do something for his followers who has been with him since 1959. Their living condition in India is terrible because they followed a right religinous leader but a wrong political leader.
I couldnt agree more, also the citizens under the exiled government in India are forced to worship whatever the Dalai Lama dictates. They are also taxed 1/3 of their salaries to the monasteries and the Dalai Lama and none of this money goes to help the citizens such as education, roads, health care, etc...
@stevenxxv ,don try makin stories here,,you are just liers,,thats all,,theres nothing is true in communisim,,,all you got is cheat your own ppl and,other nationalities,,
what you mean by powerful? you can kill whoever you want when you get power,,look at the past 60 yrs,,how many Tibetans you killed,how many Uighurs,and how many of your nation,fact is ,theres no shame in communisim
so you're basically saying that ppl who are different can't co-exist together? so much for this multicultural, "liberated" western society that we live in huh?
It is not necessary to go very far into the historical background of Tibet beyond stating that from 1912 to 1950 Tibet was virtually an independent country. No Chinese writ ran in Tibet: there was no Chinese law, no Chinese judge, no Chinese policemen on the street corner; there was no Chinese newspaper, no Chinese soldier and even no representative of the Chinese government.
fuck dalai lama, he worked with the cia to fight china
airborne4lf 1 week ago
Hey, you might get better ratings on your video if you didn't use profanity. I also feel that you video was interesting, but it wasn't structured or presented in a way that would make people want to watch all of it. Most would be offset by the seemingly rude and subjective connotations of your initial text. Only one who kept watching would see that these things are the same for the presentation of Tibet's reasons. thanks for making the video
best
keyair123 3 months ago
I'm so fucking confuse too.
Superlamo 8 months ago
THIS WAS SO FUCKING CONFUSING
lexa4782 9 months ago
china is hunger of LANDs and slaves. THATS WHY THEY KEEP ON INVADING STEP BY STEP.
09092214584 1 year ago
chinese always a threat of peace in asiA.... they also claiming da whole south china sea as part of there territory as a whole chines property whch is illegal thats da reason why ther is always hot tensions between ASEAN MEMBERS VERSUS CHINA especially da disputed island spratly island...china have no rights over spratly as da map proves that only vietnam and philippines do have da rights to claim coz its closer to them not china.
09092214584 1 year ago
not enough people know.
zianclone234500 2 years ago
RICKI_HO!!!!
MigllaKill 2 years ago
unless the truth is out about how the invasion is linked to the nazi occult connections, this - like all related conflicts - it's just going to drag out forever. it's a spiritual war.
randomlaughingman 2 years ago
A more important and relevant question is why Tibet's legal status need to be settled internationally when it was settled 60 years ago peacefully between Tibet and China where both have benefitted from such economic and political union or that Tibet has to be "'independent"' or "'Freed"' by the West when the 56 nationalities, including Tibetans, that have democratized and built and lifted Tibet out of social/religious inequalities, poverty, and illiteracy couldn't manage more of the same?
ipolarsky 2 years ago
Moreover, if the video argues that Tibetans are Mongolian and Qing (not Chinese or Han Chinese) and even Swiss, Americans, Canadians, and British is rational and leagl with emotioanl and intellectual honesty, then the Tibetans certainly can be Chinese (and have alreday fought for some 59 years ago), especially since there are multiple historical ethnic and religious groups under the Chinese Empire (like all empires) other than Han Chinese and 56 nationalities as defined by the PRC.
ipolarsky 2 years ago
[cont]
Hence, the Tibetans are as Chinese as the Scots and the Welsh are British.
ipolarsky 2 years ago
The upside down irrational logic of this video might as well be used to defend the military occupation of Hawaii, the Confederate States of America, 26 Cantons of Switzerland, the four countries of Great Britain, and other American occupied overseas military bases with the exception that the Tibetan governm't accepted a legal BILATERALLY negotiated peace agreement with China (hence can't be illegal military occupation) for 8 YEARS to be the beneficiary of a unified China.
ipolarsky 2 years ago
5:48.. china did not invade the philippines..although the naval military presence of china in spratlys and kalayaan islands is a direct threat to philippines sovereignty...
bays123456 2 years ago
nice work! plain and simple argument.. you're right, just like Nepalis are not Indians, Tibetans are not Chinese.
And, Nepalis would cut the Indians by their bones if they even dream of anything like that.
But is there an economic reason why China wants to keep Tibet under its rubric?
meercatzz 2 years ago
@meercatzz.
That's the problem. Tibetans are not Chinese enough which is why Qing dynasty failed at incorporating Tibet into the Chinese empire.
You have to make them more Chinese or else if your nation fragments (as China did in WW2), Tibet will declare defacto independence. You have to make the Tibetans more Chinese.... duh.
Phead128 1 year ago
@meercatzz MY KHUKURI IS READY
787sulav 1 year ago
FACT#1: Tibet has its own unique culture and language.
FACT#2: Tibet has ALWAYS been an independent country.
FACT#3: Tibet has never been Chinese.
SO: All ChingFuckShit GET OUT OF TIBET.
MsVicky555 2 years ago
china is china make vido about american coloni fuck of tibet is part of CHINA
serbianrule 2 years ago
you shouldnt make a movie called "EVERYTHING you need to know about tibet-china conflict" if your view is clearly subjective. that just shows how wrong you are.
pietzprove 2 years ago
I heard your third song in a fucking porn video.
HdBurningblade 3 years ago
and this moderator, like the tibet guy, equate chinese with Han, which leaves the other ethics in China nowhere.
Believe it or not, to many Chinese "chinese" is a similar idea as Canadian. and to say Mongol Yuan dynasty or Manchu Qing dynasty is not China is a joke too, keep in mind that those Emprerors sinicized themselves to a large degree.
jusalsa 3 years ago
2) Many other ethnics in China have very distinguished culture too (like Manchus, Mongols, Miaos, etc) and according to him these people all should get a piece of China of their own.
3) according to this logic should all Chinese in Canada crave a piece out of Canada because Chinese have very different "language, letter, culture, religion" from the rest of the Canadians?
jusalsa 3 years ago
I'm Hmong, or Miao if you would like to say. I've never asked myself if my people should have a country.
Well first off, even though Chinese Canadians have very difference language, letter, culture and religion fro the rest of Cdns, they still have a country called China. Tibetans have no country, as well as the Mongols, Hmong, and Manchus.
So, would it be reasonable to give them a home? And there's a difference, Canadians didn't kill and chase after CHinese people like China did Hmong.
HmongYou2Tube 2 years ago
the tibet side of argument is quite weak.
their "fact" 1 and 2 are same, about language. fact 3 about "culture", which sort of includes language, and fact 4 about "religion" which is still culture. anyways, it's naive to use such things to argue because
1) the person already assumes that "chinese" = Han and exclude Tibetan and other 54 ethnics in China,
jusalsa 3 years ago
中国人的智慧:话说天下事,合久必分,分久必合。 To be honest with you, the China today is so powerful that it is definitely hard for Tibetans to seperate it. Dalai Lama knows it but he wants to do something for his followers who has been with him since 1959. Their living condition in India is terrible because they followed a right religinous leader but a wrong political leader.
stevenxxv 3 years ago 3
I couldnt agree more, also the citizens under the exiled government in India are forced to worship whatever the Dalai Lama dictates. They are also taxed 1/3 of their salaries to the monasteries and the Dalai Lama and none of this money goes to help the citizens such as education, roads, health care, etc...
ThomasDaTubeEngine 3 years ago 3
@stevenxxv ,don try makin stories here,,you are just liers,,thats all,,theres nothing is true in communisim,,,all you got is cheat your own ppl and,other nationalities,,
what you mean by powerful? you can kill whoever you want when you get power,,look at the past 60 yrs,,how many Tibetans you killed,how many Uighurs,and how many of your nation,fact is ,theres no shame in communisim
you are just a bunch of armed animals..thats all.
FuckRedChina 1 year ago
so you're basically saying that ppl who are different can't co-exist together? so much for this multicultural, "liberated" western society that we live in huh?
Ayatsuki7734 3 years ago
WESTERN:
Massacre of the Native-Americans after gettin their helps
Took the ressources from Africans before treatin'em like the slaves
killed the aborigines before treatin their home-land as a prison
Stole the technologies from China,fucked Japan in 1945, throwed an illegal war against Vietnam, attaked Korea, India..
Treatin the Islam as the terrorism
Using Tibet,Burma,Kosovo,Tchetcenie,Kuweit..as their tools
Oppresin their own citizens if their color of skins are not white
ibeboty 3 years ago
So what exactly are you getting at? because the North Americans are guilty of injustices that should excuse CCP's injustices in Tibet?
antichauvinist 3 years ago
Fact #1 : Tibet is basicaly a single ethnic country, in fact, all the Chinese officers had been expelled from Tibet before invasion.
YAPONLUQ 3 years ago
Fact #2 :
(the International Commission of Jurists / 1959)
It is not necessary to go very far into the historical background of Tibet beyond stating that from 1912 to 1950 Tibet was virtually an independent country. No Chinese writ ran in Tibet: there was no Chinese law, no Chinese judge, no Chinese policemen on the street corner; there was no Chinese newspaper, no Chinese soldier and even no representative of the Chinese government.
YAPONLUQ 3 years ago
Fact#3 : U.S. helped China during the WW2. As everyone in the world knows, China could not have been "liberated" without US's help.
YAPONLUQ 3 years ago
Fact#4 : China always emphasis on economical development in Tibet. But, all the Asian countries have developed without China's invasion.
Who built modern city of Shanghai and Hongkong?
Who built railway in North-Eastern China?
Who built schools in Taiwan?
Someone who built something modern in China were all what they call "invaders".
YAPONLUQ 3 years ago