wow 45-80 frames per second that sucks. the larger teh spread the worse. your better off with lower consistant frames then high ping with more then half less on teh low FPS Fluxuation is bad. i wouldn't be bragging about 45-80! 35 - 60 is better then 45-80. poor guy!!
You must be new here and like most new people you mustn't know what your talking about, keep in mind Fraps is a 60% CPU hogger. The frame rate doesn't jump as you'd think and no, to your statement your wrong, higher frames is better.
When I play, it doesn't jump from 45-80 in a few seconds, its silly if you'd think it does.
45-85 is over the course of a long play, some parts would dip, but they wouldn't dip 35 fps in the course of a small amount of time. Making for a smooth game play.
if it is continuously dipping it is bad to have a high like that and a low like that . no I am not wrong about it. now if it isn't swinging like that all the time then it is fine. i really doubt that your rigs getting that igh but that is fine. no need to proove it. if it is Awesome score. i do 50's with a nvidia GTX275 in SLI, both configured for Graphics, and a Descrete Physics PCIe 1x card. which is why I doubt your getting that high, GJob though
Personally when I have FRAPs loaded and recording i loose all of about 5-10 frames 10-20. I have a Core 2 Duo E7400 though OC'd to 3.61 Ghz typically On my last rig that is. this new one is better, but i have it totally stock!!
"FRAPs usage 10% more for me, whats up with yours?"
I forgot to mention i specialize in gaming PC's and sell them for a living! nudge nudge. I did miss that your using a low resolution. spaced it ! hey it happens..
i have no problem with my core i3 530 + hd 4850 + 6gb ram,i can run the benchmark directx 10 at 1400x1050,aa 4x,everything high and 90-92% of the benchmark are never below 60fps but the 8% left it's very rare below 40
wow 45-80 frames per second that sucks. the larger teh spread the worse. your better off with lower consistant frames then high ping with more then half less on teh low FPS Fluxuation is bad. i wouldn't be bragging about 45-80! 35 - 60 is better then 45-80. poor guy!!
ez0469 1 year ago
@ez0469
You must be new here and like most new people you mustn't know what your talking about, keep in mind Fraps is a 60% CPU hogger. The frame rate doesn't jump as you'd think and no, to your statement your wrong, higher frames is better.
When I play, it doesn't jump from 45-80 in a few seconds, its silly if you'd think it does.
45-85 is over the course of a long play, some parts would dip, but they wouldn't dip 35 fps in the course of a small amount of time. Making for a smooth game play.
demonicwarrior1 1 year ago
@demonicwarrior1
if it is continuously dipping it is bad to have a high like that and a low like that . no I am not wrong about it. now if it isn't swinging like that all the time then it is fine. i really doubt that your rigs getting that igh but that is fine. no need to proove it. if it is Awesome score. i do 50's with a nvidia GTX275 in SLI, both configured for Graphics, and a Descrete Physics PCIe 1x card. which is why I doubt your getting that high, GJob though
ez0469 1 year ago
@ez0469
Keep in mind, it is a low resolution.
demonicwarrior1 1 year ago
@demonicwarrior1
Personally when I have FRAPs loaded and recording i loose all of about 5-10 frames 10-20. I have a Core 2 Duo E7400 though OC'd to 3.61 Ghz typically On my last rig that is. this new one is better, but i have it totally stock!!
"FRAPs usage 10% more for me, whats up with yours?"
ez0469 1 year ago
@demonicwarrior1
I forgot to mention i specialize in gaming PC's and sell them for a living! nudge nudge. I did miss that your using a low resolution. spaced it ! hey it happens..
ez0469 1 year ago
i have no problem with my core i3 530 + hd 4850 + 6gb ram,i can run the benchmark directx 10 at 1400x1050,aa 4x,everything high and 90-92% of the benchmark are never below 60fps but the 8% left it's very rare below 40
SuperBG78 1 year ago
Will this run RE5? AMD Athlon™ II dual-core processor P320*, 3GB, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250,Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit,2.1GHz,320GB.
GRH235 1 year ago
@GRH235
Proberly not, try downloading the benchmark tool to see.
demonicwarrior1 1 year ago
@GRH235
probably with less tehn half the eye candy, and medium Resolusion!!
ez0469 1 year ago
@ez0469 dont worry, i got a i5 and a ati 550v re5 runs smooth on my dell laptop :)
GRH235 1 year ago
im assuming framerate is 30 fps becasue of recording program right, because pretty much same as you except framerate is 50-70 fps
charliephayer123 1 year ago
@charliephayer123
he unlocked FRAPs otherwise he wouldn't hit 40. if he didn't then wwewll hmm Odd, weird
ez0469 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i run with HD 4830 (optimal Settings) and get around 60-90fps...:D
keishimasengi 1 year ago
@keishimasengi
Uncomparable, post a coheasive spec of your machine, plus settings and resolution that you were running the game.
Keep in mind that this is quite old this video you could be running anything by now.
demonicwarrior1 1 year ago
Comment removed
keishimasengi 1 year ago
5:54 that is so weird.6.0 FPS?LOL
djaism 2 years ago
Yea, for some reason when I have a recording going for too long FRAPS drops the FPS like crazy.
I had to split the recording, otherwise it would of ruined the rank at the end of the benchamark.
demonicwarrior1 2 years ago
@demonicwarrior1
becuase you have a memory leak somewhere, which is why your Flux is so high even on a differen area, your frames should still be closer
ez0469 1 year ago
my rig:
quad 2.3ghz cpu
4gb kingston ram
gigabyte hd4850 (zalman cooler)
1tb hdd
xp 32bit
it's somewhat similar to yours but my average framerate for re5 is around 65-70 fps
theshredda 2 years ago
Same when I'm not recording its around 60-80, but when I am recording my fps is cut in half or even more in some cases.
demonicwarrior1 2 years ago
@demonicwarrior1
Daym
ez0469 1 year ago
Muito loko
djleo321 2 years ago