Kent Twitchells Interview for Berlin Wall Project part 3 of 3

[sevenpedro]

I will try to resume all in one reply.

The Kent's virtuoso's it's totally positive, in my opinion in terms of Art does bring anything new, it's "just" excellent performance, the people's property are definitively personal and untouchable.

[FrescoSchool]

I think you mixing two separate parts here - the message of realism is not the mimicing/copying of the nature, that is just the tool. Take the poetry for example - we still use words, right?

[FrescoSchool]

In this particular case, the "New" here is a great portrait of the great entertainer and the new genre of the "Monument" in painting that Kent's art brought you and you can focus on undistracted by a "novelty of material" or texture. The painting is about MJ not the "form/material or style/trend" etc.

[sevenpedro]

I didn't understand... a (polemic) representation of Berlin wall have the same rights that a lexus ??? privatisation of a public memory? with wish moral can be addressed the graffiti, an vital resource for true freedom.

By the way, the photographic machine have been invented, you can be more plastic... excellent technique demonstration.

[FrescoSchool]

The people's property has the right not to be vandalized regardles whether it is a painting dedicated to Berlin wall or a lexus.

"you can be more plastic" - is this an attempt to censor Kent's work? Please explain :)