@AnimalHouseVetVideos except that no one payed 91% back then NO one that was before kennedy closed the offshore tax havens the effective tax rates one people making more than 10 million never passed 20.6% of their income even when capital gains taxes were 40% it just meant that less people bought stocks. the poverty rate didnt fall to modern levels until Kennedy slashed taxes and closed loopholes.
Bushes smear tactics caused Dukakis to fail... Look out who runs the up the budget... Regan, Bush, and Bush ii. However thats not important to get rid of our massive deficit we can either cut spending or raise taxes...But most likely we are going to cut spending and in all the wrong places. So, Videohack im guessing your republican which is great, but you need to learn reaganomics does not work and stop running up the debt
Funny how one defining moment can pop up and absolutely "Tank" a campaign. With Dukakis it was this commercial with his riding on the tank. It just made him look like one huge doofus. With that little wienerschnitzel, Howard Dean, it was that silly scream.
@starVol Lets not forget Sen.Ed Muskie in 1972 who was the front runner for the democratic nonmination ,who after finding out that some reporter wrote unflattery things about his wife broke down and cried ( like a baby) in a snowy New Hampshire campaign stump, DOOMED his chances !
CJaguar, William Weld got Mass. going again, if the Republicans would have followed his lead they wouldn't have been as bad. Why do you think Weld won the city of Boston in 1994 and won re-election easily. Weld was the BEST governor the state ever had and BOTH parties could take a page from his play book on how government should be ran.
Obama has to do the impossible to recover this country and welp, Bush is too fucking incompitent to do it and Bush 2.0/Mccain is even worse and Palin is EVEN WORSE THAN THAT TO THE POINT OF IT BEING A SATRICAL PRESIDENCY!
i feel bad for you people up there in taxa2shits you elect the same old polititions to screw up your state every election. every state in the country looks at you guys as BIG IDIOTS. ted, mike d ,j. kerry, d. pat how could you get any worse?
there is plenty of blame to go around romney gave two cents about and cared more about his presidential campaign then the state of taxachusetts. both dems and repubs suck thats why i am a independent
I admit Mike Dukakis' last term was bad. But the republicans were 10 times worse, at least Deval Patrick is trying to fix the wrongs of his predecessors, he allowed competition for car insurance companies, tried to get casinos in when everybody leaves the state for gambling. He tried to get more jobs by allowing green companies and new experimental technologies to grow. blame Sal De Masi and the other dinosaurs on beacon hill
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wellch, you're so correct. Too bad it'll be Jimmy Carter's second term. Obama bin Laden's gonna tax us to death. Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Father Pfleger, et al. bIRAQ HUSSEIN OSAMA may not even have been born in the U.S. - not even one of the 60 states he believes are in the U.S. What a dolt!
The Democrats sure have a way of giving us losers; skirt chasing JFK, nimble idiot Johnson, Peanut head Carter, wife-cheater Clinton, Gore with his climate obcession, self-inflicting wound man Kerry, Dukakis and his big head. ARGH! Heaven help us.
hey jackass, are you blind? the republicans have given us much bigger idiots, if you haven't noticed. you fail to give any reason to why they're bad presidents. let's see...sputtering moron/coke sniffer/war hungry W, filthy liar Bush sr, criminal Nixon, and don't forget Reagan with the iran-contra affair. republicans are clearly worse.just because clinton was a wife cheater doesnt make him a bad president. at least he was better than any republican.
I gotta hand it to you, sockpuppit! You're correct, Bill Clinton was a much better wife cheater than any Republican. He learned all he knew from his 'real' father, JFK. Did you know that Billy Boy's supposed father wasn't anywhere near Billy Boy's mama when he was conceived. It can be proved. He was in the military and out of the U.S. at the time. JFK did get around, didn't he!?!
I guess we're screwed either way. Shall we vote for the lesser of two evils and always get evil, or maybe it's time to form a Nationalist Party. It will be a party that will look out for the interests of our Country and our people first. I think that's what the People created government for in the first place.
You think? But you don't know do you? Go read the constitution and the federalist papers and you will KNOW why our government was created. Also, Nationalism is a scary thing, that's what gave birth to the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
Just with the reading I've done so far in my life, I know that the people created local government to do what the people could not possibly do for themselves. The state Governments were created to do what the local governments could not do. And the Federal Government was created to do only what the People, local government and state governments could not do on their own, which by the way is not very much. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
That's a gross over simplification. Please take 2 hours (if your a slow reader) out of your life to read it, rather than make assumptions about its purpose. If it's still a little foggy, read the federalist papers. Infact, every copy of the federalist papers I've seen has the constitution as its preface. (seriously, it's that short)
A gross over simplification, but not exactly wrong. I've read the Constitution, (I have the little NRA pocket version) coin money, provide for the common defense, post office, Navy etc. I have to admit that I've had a copy of the Federalist Papers for over 10 years and have only read portions of it. I will read it soon.
You seem a little condescending, that's not the best way to get your point across.
well if it's an over simplification, it is wrong. And shouldn't be used to justify a lunacy such as nationalism. What are in the best interests of our country and people? Wasn't the holocausts and gulags instituted as a way to better countries? Our nation was built on a principal of freedom, and that should be the ultimate standard our government should achieve. And not "Freedom", but the likes of which the world has never seen. And I'm sorry if I condescend, but I'm not selling anything.
yeah your right,,, attacking the wrong country, war profoiteering, running up the deficit, taking a shit on the bill of rights, and royally fucking up the value of the dollar is a lot better,
you keep watching MSNBC and applauding Al Gore speeches.....GO GET YOUR SHINE BOX. Winners rule...losers shine. (and losers complain and make stuff up) Can't help your life sucks...
Your life sucks...you are a good example of what a democrat is...huge heart, cares, loves, global warming concern, feelings tears, and helping mankind...AND full of HATE....gotta love the hate part. Hey, take meds..bleach is fine in capsule form. Don't die though...we want ya around for a few laughs.
rooster; You are dead on! I want all of the lefty fuckups in DC to keep up their insane irresponsible behavior, then, after the 2010 elections, when they go crashing down into the dustbin of history....whining and crying all the way.
It will be sooooo fuckin funny. I can hardly wait.
Two really big ones. the other ones have such a small chance of winning that most people forget about them. Although, one year the Green party actually gained a fairly substantial vote due to Ralph Nader. Otherwise, it's mostly Republicans vs. Democrats.
I see. Over here we have 8-9 which make it over 4% but then they ally with eachother trying to get into majority so they can do more stuff with less talking, but I think that's less "democracy" than if all the parties had their vote in everything. Because if say the new "allies" get 55% and only 70% of them want one thing and everyone in the rest 45% want the same as the 30% of the former 55% that "vote" are still in majority, even thought the other alternative will win. Which suck =P
Over all more local/direct democracy would probably be better because that makes people feel more like they are a part of it and got something to say, the further away the power are the less you care of belive you can affect it.
I was just asking because some people here seemed to dislike both. But then again people don't want the same over here in Sweden either, and vote accordingly :)
Ron Paul is the only politician who actually wants to lower taxes and lower spending in return. The second must follow the first, but the rest of the Republicans don't realize that. I look forward to President Paul.
This is the reason the world hates our country- "I don't like democrats" or "I don't like republicans". Me? I like people who can think without a pretty picture of a donkey or elephant.
Both parties are corrupt. Both spend like drunken sailors. The one on the military/industrial complex to kill people overseas. The other on infrastructure and social programs. One collects taxes to pay for it all, the other borrows more and more to the point of bankruptcy.
Well said! Glad to hear people like you and I still have half a brain to realize you can't borrow money (print money) forever! At some point your Creditor (China) is going to cut you off!!
Most Democrats buy votes by spending money we don't have.
DCUPtoejuice 3 months ago
Massive tax hikes are awesome. Return to the 1950's levels with a 91% top bracket, if you ask me. Our economy was booming then.
Though I do have to agree with you. One party rule can be awful. From 2001-2007, for example.
AnimalHouseVetVideos 4 months ago
@AnimalHouseVetVideos except that no one payed 91% back then NO one that was before kennedy closed the offshore tax havens the effective tax rates one people making more than 10 million never passed 20.6% of their income even when capital gains taxes were 40% it just meant that less people bought stocks. the poverty rate didnt fall to modern levels until Kennedy slashed taxes and closed loopholes.
ajgolfer1 2 months ago
democrats fail so bad, unemployment and infaltion follow, and thier buddies get all the un earned loot
bootiack 6 months ago
as a democrat i have to admit this guy was not ready to be president. he simply was ahead of himself.
hojoleon 7 months ago
Bushes smear tactics caused Dukakis to fail... Look out who runs the up the budget... Regan, Bush, and Bush ii. However thats not important to get rid of our massive deficit we can either cut spending or raise taxes...But most likely we are going to cut spending and in all the wrong places. So, Videohack im guessing your republican which is great, but you need to learn reaganomics does not work and stop running up the debt
Talegaboy 8 months ago
NOV 2ND GOD DAMMIT!
zillsburyy 1 year ago
Funny how one defining moment can pop up and absolutely "Tank" a campaign. With Dukakis it was this commercial with his riding on the tank. It just made him look like one huge doofus. With that little wienerschnitzel, Howard Dean, it was that silly scream.
starVol 2 years ago
@starVol Lets not forget Sen.Ed Muskie in 1972 who was the front runner for the democratic nonmination ,who after finding out that some reporter wrote unflattery things about his wife broke down and cried ( like a baby) in a snowy New Hampshire campaign stump, DOOMED his chances !
7980COOL1 5 months ago
womp womp womp...epic failure...this cause him big time
imsljr420 2 years ago
This ad would have been more effective without the text.
ChrisInAStrangeLand 2 years ago
Aha. too bad this guy went wrong because of the nwo agenda. a damn shame.
(PROJECT BLUE BEAM) fuck the new world order.
leadthemasses 2 years ago
Even Democrats laugh at Mike Dukakis. The guy was a joke.
darkyoda 2 years ago
Aha. too bad this guy went wrong because of the nwo agenda. a damn shame.
(PROJECT BLUE BEAM) fuck the new world order.
leadthemasses 2 years ago
Friends don't let friends Vote Democrat
gopconservative78 2 years ago
Looks like Beetle Bailey.
darkknight91 2 years ago
As if Dukakis didn't look foolish enough on that tank, did they have to paste his name across the top of the helmet?
jksonny 2 years ago
hey what is that music playing? I like it a lot
yakovlev3a 2 years ago
CJaguar, William Weld got Mass. going again, if the Republicans would have followed his lead they wouldn't have been as bad. Why do you think Weld won the city of Boston in 1994 and won re-election easily. Weld was the BEST governor the state ever had and BOTH parties could take a page from his play book on how government should be ran.
GoreFreeTennessee 2 years ago
Obama has to do the impossible to recover this country and welp, Bush is too fucking incompitent to do it and Bush 2.0/Mccain is even worse and Palin is EVEN WORSE THAN THAT TO THE POINT OF IT BEING A SATRICAL PRESIDENCY!
Makron5 3 years ago
I see. The guy who can move mountains and seas can't even balance a checkbook?
Maestrohbill 3 years ago 5
He's just an old guy. Shouldn't just focus on him anyway.
lyden2006 3 years ago
Yeah, how did one-party rule work out for our nation between 2001 and 2006?
prokrastinatorSF 3 years ago
i feel bad for you people up there in taxa2shits you elect the same old polititions to screw up your state every election. every state in the country looks at you guys as BIG IDIOTS. ted, mike d ,j. kerry, d. pat how could you get any worse?
keepinitpithy 3 years ago
there is plenty of blame to go around romney gave two cents about and cared more about his presidential campaign then the state of taxachusetts. both dems and repubs suck thats why i am a independent
CJaguar265 3 years ago
I admit Mike Dukakis' last term was bad. But the republicans were 10 times worse, at least Deval Patrick is trying to fix the wrongs of his predecessors, he allowed competition for car insurance companies, tried to get casinos in when everybody leaves the state for gambling. He tried to get more jobs by allowing green companies and new experimental technologies to grow. blame Sal De Masi and the other dinosaurs on beacon hill
CJaguar265 3 years ago
I predict Obama will be the next loser.
Wellch 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wellch, you're so correct. Too bad it'll be Jimmy Carter's second term. Obama bin Laden's gonna tax us to death. Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Father Pfleger, et al. bIRAQ HUSSEIN OSAMA may not even have been born in the U.S. - not even one of the 60 states he believes are in the U.S. What a dolt!
AlanKeyesForPrez08 3 years ago
I want your vision of America to fail.
mrpowerbeef 3 years ago 6
Unfortunately I think you also are right. For some reason we Democrats seem to always to always nominate (not elect) the wrong candidate.
locoyofl 3 years ago
I predict you'll be sad.
mrpowerbeef 3 years ago
The Democrats sure have a way of giving us losers; skirt chasing JFK, nimble idiot Johnson, Peanut head Carter, wife-cheater Clinton, Gore with his climate obcession, self-inflicting wound man Kerry, Dukakis and his big head. ARGH! Heaven help us.
AlanKeyesForPrez08 3 years ago
hey jackass, are you blind? the republicans have given us much bigger idiots, if you haven't noticed. you fail to give any reason to why they're bad presidents. let's see...sputtering moron/coke sniffer/war hungry W, filthy liar Bush sr, criminal Nixon, and don't forget Reagan with the iran-contra affair. republicans are clearly worse.just because clinton was a wife cheater doesnt make him a bad president. at least he was better than any republican.
ARGH! heaven help you, you ignorant asshole.
sockpuppit 3 years ago
I gotta hand it to you, sockpuppit! You're correct, Bill Clinton was a much better wife cheater than any Republican. He learned all he knew from his 'real' father, JFK. Did you know that Billy Boy's supposed father wasn't anywhere near Billy Boy's mama when he was conceived. It can be proved. He was in the military and out of the U.S. at the time. JFK did get around, didn't he!?!
AlanKeyesForPrez08 3 years ago 2
Mike Dukakis. HA HA HA HA HA HA. Oh GOD. NOW DUVAL. Pray for un in Mass. We're SCREWED.
ufund 3 years ago
I don't understand why we can't fucking balance the budget..people in washington are killing us.
michiganbm11 3 years ago
Now we have republicans that spend like drunken sailors. That is true bipartisan cooperation
zee339 3 years ago 2
I guess we're screwed either way. Shall we vote for the lesser of two evils and always get evil, or maybe it's time to form a Nationalist Party. It will be a party that will look out for the interests of our Country and our people first. I think that's what the People created government for in the first place.
jbranstetter04 3 years ago
Too true.
zee339 3 years ago
You think? But you don't know do you? Go read the constitution and the federalist papers and you will KNOW why our government was created. Also, Nationalism is a scary thing, that's what gave birth to the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
madseacow7084 3 years ago
Just with the reading I've done so far in my life, I know that the people created local government to do what the people could not possibly do for themselves. The state Governments were created to do what the local governments could not do. And the Federal Government was created to do only what the People, local government and state governments could not do on their own, which by the way is not very much. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
jbranstetter04 3 years ago
That's a gross over simplification. Please take 2 hours (if your a slow reader) out of your life to read it, rather than make assumptions about its purpose. If it's still a little foggy, read the federalist papers. Infact, every copy of the federalist papers I've seen has the constitution as its preface. (seriously, it's that short)
madseacow7084 3 years ago
Only 500 characters.
A gross over simplification, but not exactly wrong. I've read the Constitution, (I have the little NRA pocket version) coin money, provide for the common defense, post office, Navy etc. I have to admit that I've had a copy of the Federalist Papers for over 10 years and have only read portions of it. I will read it soon.
You seem a little condescending, that's not the best way to get your point across.
jbranstetter04 3 years ago
well if it's an over simplification, it is wrong. And shouldn't be used to justify a lunacy such as nationalism. What are in the best interests of our country and people? Wasn't the holocausts and gulags instituted as a way to better countries? Our nation was built on a principal of freedom, and that should be the ultimate standard our government should achieve. And not "Freedom", but the likes of which the world has never seen. And I'm sorry if I condescend, but I'm not selling anything.
madseacow7084 3 years ago
He looks like Captain Weenie of the Dork Patrol.
elnino103083 3 years ago
from the May 5th NEW YORKER:
"Waving from a tank in an unfortunate helmet, Dukakis looked, as Atwater put it, like Rocky the Flying Squirrel."
oldpossum 3 years ago
dukakis tank helmet and ubamas war dress. Dems are always making the wrong moves...who'd want to be one?
roostertrigger 3 years ago
yeah your right,,, attacking the wrong country, war profoiteering, running up the deficit, taking a shit on the bill of rights, and royally fucking up the value of the dollar is a lot better,
rcastaldo666 3 years ago
you keep watching MSNBC and applauding Al Gore speeches.....GO GET YOUR SHINE BOX. Winners rule...losers shine. (and losers complain and make stuff up) Can't help your life sucks...
roostertrigger 3 years ago
Just drink bleach and die.
parkingst0nes 3 years ago
Your life sucks...you are a good example of what a democrat is...huge heart, cares, loves, global warming concern, feelings tears, and helping mankind...AND full of HATE....gotta love the hate part. Hey, take meds..bleach is fine in capsule form. Don't die though...we want ya around for a few laughs.
roostertrigger 3 years ago
I have complete intolerance towards your empty irrational brainlessness. Yes, I hate and my hate is well placed.
parkingst0nes 3 years ago
rooster; You are dead on! I want all of the lefty fuckups in DC to keep up their insane irresponsible behavior, then, after the 2010 elections, when they go crashing down into the dustbin of history....whining and crying all the way.
It will be sooooo fuckin funny. I can hardly wait.
Dealit707 2 years ago
AND GET THAT SHINE BOX!!!
roostertrigger 3 years ago
AND GET THAT SHINE BOX!!!
roostertrigger 3 years ago
Does the us really only have two parties or are there just two big ones?
JohanKH 3 years ago
Two really big ones. the other ones have such a small chance of winning that most people forget about them. Although, one year the Green party actually gained a fairly substantial vote due to Ralph Nader. Otherwise, it's mostly Republicans vs. Democrats.
Zencyde 3 years ago
I see. Over here we have 8-9 which make it over 4% but then they ally with eachother trying to get into majority so they can do more stuff with less talking, but I think that's less "democracy" than if all the parties had their vote in everything. Because if say the new "allies" get 55% and only 70% of them want one thing and everyone in the rest 45% want the same as the 30% of the former 55% that "vote" are still in majority, even thought the other alternative will win. Which suck =P
JohanKH 3 years ago
Over all more local/direct democracy would probably be better because that makes people feel more like they are a part of it and got something to say, the further away the power are the less you care of belive you can affect it.
I was just asking because some people here seemed to dislike both. But then again people don't want the same over here in Sweden either, and vote accordingly :)
JohanKH 3 years ago
This was hilarious!!
Maestrohbill 4 years ago
Guiliani wants to lower taxes and spending... and as added bonus, he doesn't blame 9/11 on America. I like Ron Paul, but he's just kinda... crazy.
smoketnt 4 years ago
Ron Paul is the only politician who actually wants to lower taxes and lower spending in return. The second must follow the first, but the rest of the Republicans don't realize that. I look forward to President Paul.
midnightbright 4 years ago
i think you should go marry ron paul.
gerryisnotfunny 4 years ago
Republicans have been in charge of EVERYTHING from the last 6 years, and the deficit has swelled. So don't blame it on the Dems.
Dukakis, however, looks like a complete idiot in that tank.
GoblinGirl 4 years ago
As if the democrats are any better...
VOTE RON PAUL 08!!!
iaintnocommunist 4 years ago
Great, another Ron Paul supporter.
But I don't like Dems, either, especially Hillary.
GoblinGirl 4 years ago 2
This is the reason the world hates our country- "I don't like democrats" or "I don't like republicans". Me? I like people who can think without a pretty picture of a donkey or elephant.
manwalrus 3 years ago
Both parties are corrupt. Both spend like drunken sailors. The one on the military/industrial complex to kill people overseas. The other on infrastructure and social programs. One collects taxes to pay for it all, the other borrows more and more to the point of bankruptcy.
Koralaa 4 years ago 2
Yup.
Libertarians FTW.
VOTE RON PAUL!
iaintnocommunist 4 years ago
Well said! Glad to hear people like you and I still have half a brain to realize you can't borrow money (print money) forever! At some point your Creditor (China) is going to cut you off!!
kennedyucla 4 years ago
maybe we will vote for Democrats and nationlize all indusrty and coporations
bobalu10 3 years ago
I love this video!
CarolSh 5 years ago