charles darwin was an idiot. the darwinian theory of evolution is IMPOSSIBLE for so many reasons. Just because the theory seems logical enough, does not make it true, which is why it is still a THEORY. evoulution does exist, but not darwinian evolution.
@Oranjeklant if u call philosophy useless then ur just not understanding it. stop being shallow. read a basic introduction to philosophical logic. see for ur self how many mistakes we make in reasoning. then u will start to appreciate the role of philosophy in helping us think rationally.
@Oranjeklant These are themselves philosophical positions about the nature of explanation and the status of philosophy itself. Would you care to defend it? If you can't then you're being dogmatic and we should ignore you, and if you can then you're arguing a philosophical position.The statement you make commits you to a position that is either self defeating or born of pure dogmatism. Btw: Sober doesn't think evolutionary theory needs a deity, evidently you took away a different message.
FACT. I SEE THROUGH THE OBJECTS:WALLS,STONS,BEAM,HANDS,OTHER. I HAVE CREATED IMAGES:PORTRAITS,ANIMAL'S FACES ON CLOUDS & VARNISH FROM LONG DISTANCE AND TO GIVE INTENTIONAL SHAPE, THE AREA IN THE CLOUDS MUST BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE TEST.
charles darwin was an idiot. the darwinian theory of evolution is IMPOSSIBLE for so many reasons. Just because the theory seems logical enough, does not make it true, which is why it is still a THEORY. evoulution does exist, but not darwinian evolution.
Alkhemist10 10 months ago
Philosophers are useless; Sober confirms this once again.
Evolution doesn't need a deity; so why try to let Him sneak in through the back-door ?
Oranjeklant 1 year ago
@Oranjeklant Darwin was a philosopher; a naturalist. Fool.
agents1986 9 months ago
@Oranjeklant if u call philosophy useless then ur just not understanding it. stop being shallow. read a basic introduction to philosophical logic. see for ur self how many mistakes we make in reasoning. then u will start to appreciate the role of philosophy in helping us think rationally.
Dathinkingman 8 months ago
@Oranjeklant These are themselves philosophical positions about the nature of explanation and the status of philosophy itself. Would you care to defend it? If you can't then you're being dogmatic and we should ignore you, and if you can then you're arguing a philosophical position.The statement you make commits you to a position that is either self defeating or born of pure dogmatism. Btw: Sober doesn't think evolutionary theory needs a deity, evidently you took away a different message.
selfishreplicator 5 months ago
I' d like to inform...
SCIENCE & PSYCHOKINESIS
FACT. I SEE THROUGH THE OBJECTS:WALLS,STONS,BEAM,HANDS,OTHER. I HAVE CREATED IMAGES:PORTRAITS,ANIMAL'S FACES ON CLOUDS & VARNISH FROM LONG DISTANCE AND TO GIVE INTENTIONAL SHAPE, THE AREA IN THE CLOUDS MUST BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE TEST.
You may to see may BLOG...
Thank You
martini4948 1 year ago
THanks
martini4948 2 years ago
Ditto.
technepisteme 1 year ago