I didn't see a difference.. oh well 1.48 volts an electrode at high amps = less heatr more hho...... dont bother with all the funky gadgets, passing another amp or 2 through it and watch the production increase...
If technology like this exists why hasn't it been applied to cars? Is the government suppressing technology then coming out at the last second to save us all with "miracle discovery" of hydrogen fuel cells..
@kmain0 Better technology exists and has for years. Also VW makes a diesel vehicle that gets 240 mpg and is sold in China (google it). The real issue is not our government, but people. They want Horse Power and looks more than caring about the environment. Unfortunately there will be a large cost. The technology we are using is more like what was used back in the 40's. And I don't mention if it is cost effective. Using Solar power and pulse technology we have managed to make it an alternative.
@obiwan177 One of the biggest reasons we use a pulse generator is because the tubes would overheat in a matter of minutes. Generally the less voltage you use the less hydrogen is produced, but we do get more production for the amps used when using a pulse generator. So yes, it is more efficient not only for production but for keeping it cool as well.
@hydrogenauto So just decreasing the amperage and having it go continuously would still be less efficient? That way it wouldn't overheat as much. Hm. Interesting.
Is there any difference to the style or shape of electrodes? I've seen some with pipes like you have here, but others use plates and some use wires. Have you found the pipes to be the most effective?
@obiwan177 We have used many different shapes throughout the years and tubes are just the easiest to attain. A bell shape like Guass had found would probably be the best but the most difficult to purchase. The tubes work good and retain their shape to maintain the 1 - 1.5 mm distance between the two tubes. Wire is kind of ridiculous. Please read hydrogen facts at our website to get a better idea of what is truth and what is not.
@obiwan177 no , you could also have plates inside the pipe, and gian more output. if if you hade 2 input currents at diffrent hz fercunies that would increase the effecincy as well.
@Trunkten38 or seal the edge of the plate and gain from not leaking current around the path of least resistance and onto the surface where its most usefull :-)
thanks for the input. We are always trying new things. "Not one of us is as smart as all of us."
hydrogenauto 10 months ago
I didn't see a difference.. oh well 1.48 volts an electrode at high amps = less heatr more hho...... dont bother with all the funky gadgets, passing another amp or 2 through it and watch the production increase...
Me102288 10 months ago
If technology like this exists why hasn't it been applied to cars? Is the government suppressing technology then coming out at the last second to save us all with "miracle discovery" of hydrogen fuel cells..
kmain0 1 year ago
@kmain0 Better technology exists and has for years. Also VW makes a diesel vehicle that gets 240 mpg and is sold in China (google it). The real issue is not our government, but people. They want Horse Power and looks more than caring about the environment. Unfortunately there will be a large cost. The technology we are using is more like what was used back in the 40's. And I don't mention if it is cost effective. Using Solar power and pulse technology we have managed to make it an alternative.
hydrogenauto 1 year ago
Is this more efficient than just steady voltage?
obiwan177 1 year ago
@obiwan177 One of the biggest reasons we use a pulse generator is because the tubes would overheat in a matter of minutes. Generally the less voltage you use the less hydrogen is produced, but we do get more production for the amps used when using a pulse generator. So yes, it is more efficient not only for production but for keeping it cool as well.
hydrogenauto 1 year ago
@hydrogenauto So just decreasing the amperage and having it go continuously would still be less efficient? That way it wouldn't overheat as much. Hm. Interesting.
Is there any difference to the style or shape of electrodes? I've seen some with pipes like you have here, but others use plates and some use wires. Have you found the pipes to be the most effective?
obiwan177 1 year ago
@obiwan177 We have used many different shapes throughout the years and tubes are just the easiest to attain. A bell shape like Guass had found would probably be the best but the most difficult to purchase. The tubes work good and retain their shape to maintain the 1 - 1.5 mm distance between the two tubes. Wire is kind of ridiculous. Please read hydrogen facts at our website to get a better idea of what is truth and what is not.
hydrogenauto 1 year ago
@obiwan177 no , you could also have plates inside the pipe, and gian more output. if if you hade 2 input currents at diffrent hz fercunies that would increase the effecincy as well.
Trunkten38 1 year ago
@Trunkten38 or seal the edge of the plate and gain from not leaking current around the path of least resistance and onto the surface where its most usefull :-)
Me102288 10 months ago
;) NICE!!!!!!!!
MINIBNRR 2 years ago
Nice, so what is the output gas rate v.s. amperage ?
oystla 3 years ago
I have another video showing the output. You can watch it fill a 20 oz bottle. It is drawing about 8 amps depending on your pulse setting.
hydrogenauto 3 years ago