Added: 3 years ago
From: WatchMojo
Views: 284,981
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (495)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LCD and LED have never been chosen as best TV of any year, I own both and theres no question that Plasma has the best picture.........PEACE

  • I'm wondering if you know that LED is just an LCD with another type of illumination and there is no difference at all in terms of image quality. The only difference is the energy consumption.

  • A bit dated video. It's 2012 now. LED is the way to go.

  • OLED > Plasma > LED LCD > LCD

  • @waff3ls TOTALLY TRUE

  • @GhostHawk76 All you said is BULLSHIT. I have a 42 inch panasonic plasma and im going to correct you.

    1. 2010-2011 plasma models consume AS MUCH AS ENERGY AS LCD TVs.

    2. If a cell (pixel) dies on a plasma,only that cell turns to a black dot,on a LCD,the whole vertical line goes black.

    3. All 3D TVs (PLASMA AND LCD) harm your eyes. If you want 3D,buy a new generation 3D PLASMA OR LCD THAT DONT NEED GLASSES.

    You seem like you know nothing about TVs.

  • every 1 forget about the good old DVD VHS anf the old time favorite ABC :(

  • LED is the best ;)

  • @HDTransformers LED is still a LCD :D just because they got different back light doesn't make them different

  • LED is better than all

  • LED is better than all

  • @HDTransformers Haha, do you need to write 3 sentences to prove it? :L

  • both top comments truly stupid wondering how still people like their comments!?

    1.the Plasma screen consumes more electrical energy than LCD .

    2.the Plasma working on cell matrix (cells glow) If one of these disruption cells will affect negatively on whole screen.

    3.the 3D Plasma so bad and harm your eyes, plus the 3D plasma glasses expensive and require battery.

    These points through my experience with damn Plasma ( LCD IS THE BEST DO NOT BUY PLASMA YOU WILL REGRET )

  • @GhostHawk76 Lcd was never the best. Plasma is better in every way compared to a lcd television. I actually know because I own both.

  • @ MrJascol: lol if u mention a 50" plasma that use 120w u should compare with an 50" lcd/led that use 60w ;) and i guess u dont know the difference between edge led and full led backlight with local diming :p anyway, merry christmas :D

  • Is it true that you will have pixel burn on lcd over time? like losses in pixel and you can see a black spot onit? Im not so sure on this hope you guys know better in this..care to explain?

  • @vdelcastillo99: can u read ? i said LED Backlight and not LED Panel !

    i have to time to argue with a plasma fanboy who never watched a movie

    in dark room on a LCD TV with FULL LED Backlight and Local Dimming

    enjoy ur superior picture quality, ur black level and ur electricity bill ! bye

  • @bluraydiscs I have a 50 inch LG plasma Tv that uses 120w and a samsung 32inch LCD Tv which i use as my pc monitor and that uses 200w, i've also seen my friends tv which is a LED backlight and is 32inch and that uses 110w. and as for the picture quality a plasma Tv is without any doubts unbeatable,although The LED backlight TV's have depth than a LCD TV and result in a much richer quality picture than a LCD its no where near that of a plasma.and before you come back, they both have pros and cons

  • @ManofSteelAEC lol LCD is not even good for gaming bro. Plasma takes that bait too. Reason because LCD got input lag

  • LCD sucks, Plasma sucks ... only FULL LED Backlight with Local Dimming is perfect but to bad most manufacturs use EDGE LED because its much chaper ...

  • @bluraydiscs don't be an ignorant.. saying LCD sucks is saying that LED sucks as well.. because led is just a technology for LCD PANEL.. do you get it ignorant? PLASMA is a totally different panel technology, which had been proven to have much superior picture quality, better response frame and better black levels.. that's a fact.. the only panel technology superior to plasma is OLED, which is NOT LCD (as full led is)

  • If you want your eye to be irritated, go to lcd, !!! try to watch on lcd more longer hours, then you need a visine eye drop.

  • plasma wins hands down, for picture quality

  • Worst Plasma is better than the best LCD which is a Sharp Aquos :)

  • In image quality the worst Plasma is better than the best LCD. And the best LCD is probably a Sharp fully illuminated LED TV. and it is twice the price of an equivalent plasma. Well plasmas consume power yes but Panasonic is good on that issue. Panel life and burn in problems are already solved. Producers pretend that people prefer LED TVs. In fact that is what they prefer to sell. It is just much cheaper to manufacture LCD panels than plasmas.

  • In image quality the worst Plasma is better than the best LCD. And the best LCD is probably a Sharp fully illuminated LED TV. and it is twice the price of an equivalent plasma. Well plasmas consume power yes but Panasonic is good on that issue. Panel life and burn in problems are already solved. Producers pretend that people prefer LED TVs. In fact that is what they prefer to sell. It is just much cheaper to manufacture LCD panels than plasmas.

  • Only LED seems to come near Plasmas right now. I'd buy an LCD for gaming because in this case, natural colors and natural display is not crucial (plus, I don't need 50 inch for gaming). LCD is better on movies only for the undemanding eye. It's just as simple as that.

    Compare in your living rooms, not in store. You'll see the difference at first glance. Beware. You'll never ever want to watch a movie on a LCD again :)

  • Plasma (panasonic) is a superb tv than any lcd tv (sucks)

  • I agree with you on many points.. but you're missing some :).

    For a good and simple overview explaining the main differences between LCD, LED and Plasmas in Laymens terms, try googling lcdledplasmaguide

    Cheers' :)

  • plasma has deeper more pronounced blacks this equals more lifelike colours and more realistic tones. i brought a LED .. great for gaming but within a few days i took it back and got a panasonic plasma.. TV is for relaxation and my eyes did very little of that bright unnatural picture.

  • I had a look at both and Sharp LED's are the best, the picture is awesome and better than any plasma.

  • Which is best for gaming?

  • @EnjoyMyDust Definatly LCD as there is no burn in, if you play a game on a plasma the hud will burn in and stay there for hours.

  • I watch tv for long hours? which tv is safe for eyes?

  • i did not mention that the 32 inch was sony lcd

  • im a plasma guy first i star w a 32inch change to 42 then 46 then 50 then 54 and now im stuck w a 63 samsung plasma i.love plasma ..

  • Just got my 42 inch samsung plasma today(08-10-2011), when you are looking at a 42 inch tv on a paper on online, it dont look nearly as big as it is when you see it in person, 42 inch is huge! But I did notice that when in a brighter room, the lcd does have a slighty sharper picture.

  • I hate that "Old Spice" guy!!!

    

  • I Recently got a Sharp Aquos 46" LCD is it good?

  • @MrFoggyG Sharp and LG makes the best LCD's...

  • @QUIKKSTAR And Plasma! :-)

  • @marcus974ever Yeah I hear LG makes great plasmas, not sure about Sharp. But they say Panasonic is the absolute best at plasma technology

  • @MrFoggyG

    whats the price?

  • The LCD takes less power only in comparasion with plasma, which shows just and only white colors. LCD takes the same amount of power all the time, in plasma - it depends on colors we want to watch.

  • plasma fuckin sucks when the sun shines it reflects so damn sensitive agains light LCD wins 

  • plasmas cause burn-in, lcd is better.

  • I like my screen to be smooth, bright, and non reflective. And with the color and refresh rates becoming unnoticable between high end versions of both types, I will be going with the LED lcd tv. I will also be having my computer and game systems hooked up, which is scary to do with Plasma's burn in problems. Also, LED's have a way longer shelf life than plasma FACT. LED tvs are slim, economical, dont run hot, and arew beautiful on the wall. For me there is no question. LED lcd is the way.

  • @Ckrepp564 you are an idiot plasma provided it's Neo Plasma is the Way! You get the truest blacks out of Plasma. You get the fastest Pixel response time. And you never never miss a frame with it 600hz refresh rate!

  • and cathode-ray tvs have a glass screen already 80-90y.,than...my choice is the plasma

  • If you want 47" or less, go with LCD brands like LG, Sony or Samsung for peace of mind. 60"+ LCD, I'd say go with Sharp!

    If you desire 50" or more, Plasma (3D) no question, only if you don't have a bright ass setting in your room. Panasonic or Samsung! Panasonic is less-glare and well built. The Samsung has richer colors, but screen is very reflective and TV not as sturdy.

    For me, LED (Sony, LG, or Samsung) is my choice! Bright like LCD, slim, plasma-like blacks, less bezel, and just SEXY!!

  • plasma dose not burning problem's anymore lol people need to stop saying that. yeah it will happen to a lcd and plasma if u leave them on the same image for more than 24 hours maybe even more but you would not do that anyway. both great matters what you want.

  • @fakeliquidkid Burn-in never happens on a LCD... try again bitch!

  • @QUIKKSTAR then u have no idea what your going on about. i seen it on Samsung LCD screen's i had one that had screen burn i seen other's to, no need to call me a bitch like a little child. grow up.

  • @fakeliquidkid thats a negative, brand new plasmas cause burn-in within 4 hours of use. Also, LCD does NOT cause burn-in....ever.

  • LED is better

  • @SilentKnight1000 better for what idiot? picture quality, black levels? if you think that you are a fucking ignorant.. get the facts right idiot.

  • whoa, he was fast! :o

  • plasma's don't last a very long time and it has much more problems than an ordinary lcd

  • @Ps3darkfuhrer stop spewing bullshit. look it up before you give out the wrong info. the tvs of today are said to last 20years plus!!!

    Lcds have problems. back lights go out, pixels die, the led zones blow out, they rape your bank account.

  • @SpdDemon69 yes ofc that's what they say 20 years but believe me i had many plasma's THEY DON'T LAST FUCKING 20 YEARS LOL. I mean they're good like in contrast and refreshrate but you know why they're so cheap? lol just admit it they do have much more problems with plasma

  • @SpdDemon69

    and soon they're gonna perfect LED, that technology is gonna beat lcd (led backlight) and plasma but you will pay alot but it's always the same with new technologies. just have to wait then

  • JUST FULL LED FULL HD SONY THE BEST! [=

  • I love when people argue over preferences =] Both are great. Just depends on your room/windows and what looks good to you. LCD for bright rooms. Plasma for a dark home theater =]

  • plasma is crap u buy one for like $600+ and it burns out on you like an xbox piece of crap save yourselves some money and some piece of mind buy a LCD do it for the children

  • @gtrhetgstr6gr6yg Plasma = better than LCD, you just don't know anything about technologies.

  • @LostSubscriber well sir thank you for your opinion but the last part was not necessary plus i know a lot about technology and your grammar is incorrect it should be technology not technologies.

  • @gtrhetgstr6gr6yg do you know any greek?

  • Comment removed

  • Plasma have burn in. It is susceptible for burn in at any time, but not as severe as the 1st two years.. They have good lawyers to prevent you from getting it repaired, Theyve known about the problem & have been exploiting people ever since. DONT BUY PLASMA!!!

  • FUCK SAMSUNG

  • @hitek835 why what has samsung done to u to! dont blame samsung!

  • Lcd=no reflection,brighter ,sharper image,no burn in,uses less electricity

  • higher contrast ratio = plasma

    smoother motion = plasma

    cheaper = plasma

    the only problem with plasma is that its a glass screen, but its really not that bad, just close the curtains & turn off lights or get lights on the walls rather than the ceilings.

    LCD is only good point is that it has no reflection, thats it!

  • @iAmMasterF na, that's not it, LCD's don't have the burning problem as the plasma has and therefor is probably aa better choice for those who wanna hook up the computer or a console.

  • @iAmMasterF lcd is cheaper you fool

  • @nraithatha1995 are you dumb? plasmas are cheaper, thats a known fact. Go check your local supermarket.

  • @lilshoxx lcd's are cheaper!

    Here product from johnlewis

    TX-L42U3 (LCD) £479

    PS43D450A2 (Plasma) £509

    42HL833B (LED) £549

    these are all the lowest price products within a range of 42-45 inch lcd is the cheapest you spec.

  • o shit :S

    i just checked other websites like pcworld... and lcd's are cheaper now.

    sorry then i thought plasmas were still cheaper

  • @lilshoxx they always have been! It is a known fact I think maybe you are confussed and meant LED !

    the reason why i'm so certain is because I upgrade my home cinema tv every single year. So I've seen the prices change and LCD has always been the cheapest. 5 years ago i bought a 55' tv and it cost me £1000 more for plasma

  • i agree with you but you forgot to mention the burn in effect,,,,

  • @rebeloskylo

    burn in doesnt occour in plasmas nowasays... that was only for the first 4-6 generations on plasmas, not anymore.

  • @iAmMasterF LCD has much higher resolution, O you conveniently forgot to mention that.

  • @iAmMasterF

    Lcd is cheaper up to 42" ... over 42" plasman can be produced cheaper... but the definitly better quality has the plasma!

    PLASMA!!!!

  • @xXKrajisnikXx thats because plasmas are only produced at 42" + ...smh

  • @iAmMasterF Yeah and Plasma burn easily LCD dont burn easy 

  • wehts better for gaming??

  • @gearsgamer1

    i really dont know but im buying 107cm (42") 1080i plasma cause my room is dark and i have to buy someting good for my ps3 im playing on pathetic 15" CRT tv right now PS plasma is cheaper............

  • @gearsgamer1 Plasma, better colors, brighter, and works with fast motion HOWEVER if you play video games in a very bright room, its might relect and glare so you might want to shut off those lights and close the curtains

  • i wish he asked the guy at the end for 1 last question what whould you choose ???

  • @MrYoichiii personally i have owned nothing but put plasma tv's..i use them for everything movies, GAMING, streaming, tv..there are lcd's out there that can come close to matching the color warmth/ color accuracy but that's just it they can only come close. i have had my tv's for about 3 years and have never had any problems with "burn in" and trust me i'm very OCD when it comes to these things

  • @miasmablk thank you for replying

  • But plasmas break quicker.

  • @ArcticInfinity how do you figure that? panasonic plasma televisions have a life expectancy of about 34 years.

  • plasma

    

  • PLASMA

  • @Thegroundissour Lmao best comment I've read in a while, thanks for the laughs lol..

    Lmao "hold the tv when viewing".

  • PLASMA FTW!!!!

  • Say Sony Trinitron and LCD and Plasma will get owned!

  • is plasma good for playin video games in hd?

  • @eseblue13 definitely

  • @eseblue13 i have a plasma i use it for video games like mw2 blackops NFS Shift stuff like that its 600Hz 2,000,000:1 contrast ratio and i have never noticed a drag or a lag in the image

  • Comparing LCD and plasma is like the special olympics. Whatever the winner is, it's still retarded. Both technologies are rubbish compared to a Sony Trinitron.

  • @Davez621 Agreed. I own all 3. Trinitron was light years ahead.

  • I one ceiling fan with 2 light bulbs to much light for a plasma tv? Pleas answer

  • ничего не понял толком, че он так быстро говорит?? буд то торопиться куда то

  • What a retard.

    The material they put in front of the image generating space (glass, plastic) has nothing to do with the technologies, nor does size.

    You can made an LCD or a plasma any size you want, and you can but them both behind plastic, glass, or even concrete if you felt like it.

    Plasma's a dead technology, as far as I can tell. I mean, burn-ins? What a f***ing mess.

  • @toastybox actually there a no HD plasmas less then 42" for a reason. That's why only few companies make them.

  • @toastybox You don't know what you are talking about. The new Plasma's rarely burn-in unless you are an idiot and leave a still image on it all the time. And LCD can't duplicate the black levels, quick response rate, and rich textures for a cinematic enjoyment.

  • There are LCDs which can match and even beat the black levels of some plasma, even cheapos such as samsung 5 series. Plasmas do retain the black better in the dark though. The best advantage of plasmas i think is motion capabilities, and while burn-in may not be common any more, retention is very common, and can last for quite a while..

  • @maneatingtoilets

    no thanks i had series 7 and sorry but the "smoothness" was _SHIT_ now i think about an plasma. i guess its the best way to go if you want big screen and HD.

    also i would like to see FULL LED HD but what the hell is wrong again? those glas fronts are fucking huge mirrors. okay you are an bad actor and no job? buy an full glas LCD and enjoy yourself in every movie... be leonardo di caprio or christian bale!

  • 50 plasma all the way or BIGGER but I got a 50

  • It is a simple answer to the LCD vs. Plasma Question

    Buy DLP !!!!

  • lcd is better

  • and Plasma spends too much energy!

  • @JooHaxDemoTaken Ill put my calibrated kuro 141 against your sony bravia lcd anyday. If you say plasmas are the way of hddvds, then why did LG started making plasmas towards the end of 2010? Cause theres still a market for it and always will be cause you cant beat the PQ of plasma.

  • This guy does not know what hes talking about, giving false statements. Plasmas are much more smooth and more life like then lcd/led 120 or 240hz. Also you cant say plasma burn more energy. If you are watching a movie that has consistent dark scenes, Plasmas uses just about the same amount of energy then lcd.

  • @vannyik No man this guy is right, yours is false. First LCD has better technology than Plasmas! If you have plasma in a big room 50" the picture is good anyway Plasmas will still flashing in dark while LCD depicts in dark and white day very, very nice picture. You see that the Plasma is thin while LCD have TFT and is more durable than Plasma. Yes, both have nice HD picture with resolution 1920:1080 FULL HD but the difference between the two TV's are that LCD is more durable than Plasma.

  • Uses more energy and gives off heat, but when it comes to picture quality and motion you still can't beat a plasma.

  • plasmas are cheap people are gonna agree because plasmas are less money

  • can someone tell me what tv is better for gaming

  • @clevelandsmith65 plasmas has the better quality color, contrast, black really black, and one thing that caught my attention is that games are less serrated on plasma TVs than on tv lcds, an example is the old game Halo 3, xbox 360 on plasma tvs I I tested the graphics of the game was beautiful and smooth, the lcd tv was a garbage full of jaggies and textures ugly.

  • Lets face it guys, plasma is going the way of hddvd, albeit at a slower rate.I would never buy a plasma and i have yet to see a plasma that gives a better picture or smoother motion than my bravia in all conditions, meaning light room,dark room,fast motion movies and gaming.Of course if you wanna compare some no name pos lcd to some high end plasma then yeah the plasma will come out on top but compare like for like with 2 high end products and then make YOUR choice on what you see and like.

  • @JooHaxDemoTaken Then you obviously haven't watched a Pioneer kuro PDP LX5090 or KRP 500. Widely regarded by the majority of the industry as the best televisions ever made, and if your bravia engine is superior, I'll set fire to my house.

  • How much more energy does plasma consume than LED or LCD?

    Does plasma still have image burns?

    How good is Panasomic Viera TC-50PX24?

  • @htu0729 Plasmas burn a significantly greater amount of energy more than LCD or LED TVs. Newer plasmas never (or very rarely) suffer from burn-in so it shouldn't be too much of an issue.

  • Lets clear this all up for you who dont know. 600hz subfield is a marketing technique created to compete with LCD when they introduced the 120hz LCD. Plasma tv's have 10 subfields that operate at 60hz each...The reason 60hz looks slow on a LCD is because it takes a while for the electric current to charge the LCD. Plasmas on the other hand works from lights charged with xenon and neon gas...Because it's a gas, electricity activates it quicker than it would activate liquid crystals

  • LOOOL.. you lot r funny.. lcd iz a better screen, but plasma haz great refresh rate, but if you got a lcd with 100hz or 200hz,, den ur good to go.. SIMPLEZ!!!!!!

  • lcd...saves power

    cheaper and better for gamers

  • @47crazed LCD is not better for games anymore. I have a plasma (#1 rated HDTV on the market, check it out on my channel) and the newer plasmas will not suffer from burn in. Other than burn-in (which is not there on new plasmas) what does LCD have over plasma on gaming? Nothing.

  • @EpiclsME well thanks :)

  • Plasma TVs are the best there is, only noobs do not know it, Led's just marketing.

    those who know know that the Panasonic Viera plasma Full HD 600Hz TVs are best and are much better than any LED and LCD, plasmas are 600 hz! and the LCD and LED are not even close to it, the motion of plsmas resolution is much better than those of LCDs and LEDs, if you connect any LCD and LED next to a plasma Viera you get to see that the plasma is much better! better color, resolution, color black more real.

  • @TheFred128 Your statement tells me you're a noob. While i agree, the Panny plasmas are the best there is, but not the 09 range as they were shit, they're not 600hz. They're 600 hz sub field drive. And as for your LED marketing statement, 600hz is pure marketing. 2 reasons. One, see sub field drive. And 2, Higher frame refresh rate was invented for LCD as they were the panels that suffered from motion issues, not plasmas. Making you pay for something you don't require is marketing.

  • @jamesf348 One thing is certain, take any LCD and LED and put the side of the Panasonic Viera, a dark room to see that the plasma is much better.

    if you search you will see that the Motion Resolution of plasmas is much bigger and better than those of LCD and LED, what is a great vantagem.esses 600 hz makes difference! if you look at the scenes of the moving plasma 600 hz you will see they are perfect without a trace, much better than the LEDs and LCD

  • @TheFred128 Think you've misunderstood me. I certainly will never ever buy an LCD. I have a Panny TH-37PX80 Plasma. My plasma handles motion better than my brothers "600hz" SUB FIELD DRIVE LG plasma. I'm not gonna argue with you. I install home theatres for a living, so what would i know!

  • Comment removed

  • @jamesf348 Ok bro u also works with electronics like me.

  • i want ~40inch tv so i have to go with LCD if i were going to get 50inch+ id get plasma only cuz they are like half the price but everyone knows that LED>LCD>Plasma

  • this guy is stupid

  • they are both amazing televisions. but i find plasma a little bit more crispier, and LCD a faster frame rate. so i dont really know...

  • Ur eye can see no more than 60hz, u can't even see 600 hz don't think higher is better... who would wanna buy i7 980x for emailing and watching movies -.-

  • @quangluu96

    If you mean fps (in Hz): Higher IS better. Your eye doesn't see in frames, since every cell sends a separate signal to the brain.

    If you mean Light frequency (color): We can see wavelangths of around 100000 Hz.

  • LCD FOR THE WIN!!!

  • FKING ADS

  • Plasma>LED>LCD

    Thats not to say, however, that LCD is bad. LCD HDTVs are still pretty good...just not the best.

  • I own a LED TV and I am very happy with it. Picture is crystal clear and my TV runs cool, you don't feel any heat radiating from it what so ever, even when your right up next to it.

  • @Seirei0417 True. They are crystal clear. But cost twice as much for similar quality. And Plasma's have a more natural look to it. Not artificial brightness. It's a preference thing but I'll take a more real life picture.

  • Comment removed

  • Ice Age ftw

  • Lcd TVs will be amazing as soon as there is a break through that allows response times to be ultra fast.

  • @SuperMangn And a break through that allows for deeper blacks. LCD is still a long way from having the picture quality of a top notch plasma.

  • i watch my tv at night so no difficult decisions.

  • we have a 50 inch plasma tv panasonic viera and i think that plasma tv dont break as much as lcd they are harder to break so plasma tv are a lot stronger but lcd u were right there is hardley any reflection on them lol.

  • i have a 42 inch lg plasma that i game on and for watching cable i have a 40 inch sony bravia

  • i HATE Plasma. Glare, Heat, Burn imiges in screen, etc. also they are terrable for gaming. and Plasma has a smoother picture while LCD has a sharper one.

  • @KingOfSand100 That is with plasma's 5 years ago.. I don't have that kind of problems.. I got a Panasonic viera plasma 56", it works great on my xbox 360!

  • @elimx1 i meant they are bad for games because they still have the ability to burn images into your screen. and the reason why gaming is bad for it, is because gaming generally always has brighter images than anything else. so you may not need to leave it on, but constant game play of a certain game like CoD4 over say a year can start to leave little burn marks on the inside of your TV. this is unavoidable.

  • @KingOfSand100 it has been fixed. I had days I played like 8 hours COD4, and no problems at all..

  • @elimx1 it takes longer than 8 hours. it usually takes a year. you cant fix that issue either. its the fact that there is heat and bright light hitting the glass that makes that happen.

  • @elimx1 i would know. after about a year and a half with my Pioneer Elite Plasma i started to see little dark spots on the inside of my screen.

  • @KingOfSand100 YOU FUCKING IDIOT!! Plasmas are superior for gaming due to faster response times and lower input lag. Go out and get yourself a sony KDL-40EX503 LCD and play modern warfare online.... You'll get battered every game.

  • my plasma has a plastic screen

  • its advice like "you should get plasma but lcd would be as same good as plasma" = no advice at all

  • Plasma TV's often creates radio interference problems (EMC). Pleas use LED or LCD ! Plasma TV's are altso very power hungry (lot's of watt used). Thank you.....

  • @rdehli Not the newer ones. I have a 50in panasonic viera that uses like 200 watts

  • Most plasma TVs uses either 12 or 16 bit video processor up to 68.7 billion to 28 trillion colours which is very wide colour gamut and also reduces colour banding .100,000hrs life panel can last up to 17-30 years . uses ridiculously higher power consumption and uses lead.

    but reduced power watts in newer models as low as LCD

  • Plasma TVs were made for motion pictures (in a dark room with a big TV, the home theatre thing). I tend to laugh when people buy a LCD sized 40 "and over. Even though it's HD, it doesn't hold on fast motion as well as the Plasma and the color is not accurate at all. It's cheating on the clairity of its crystals to make you believe of a clearer image. The range of colors on a Plasma is way better than a LCD. Sadly, Plasma are very delicate screens compared th LCD ans also way heavier.

  • Plasma's are starting to get Old.

  • not exactly true, even at the time, plasmas were 1080p at 42", panasonic had the pz series which did this

  • 1:29 look at the tvs lol FAIL xD

  • @MarkSuperHabbo2 how is that a fail?