well my theory is that a 3d model of manhattan was used and the real pictures of the wtc were over-imposed on that model. Since the wtc are very tall building you can easily mask the lower part of the video and replace it with a 3d rendering. The bridge is no just moving, it's rotating around the wtc together with the rest of the fake 3d scenario
But why are you stating that no explosives were used??
There were explosions. This is a fact that cannot be disputed, there are so many witnesses that speak about them.
Maybe some kind of direct energy weapon was used too. This would explain why the building was completely pulverized and also the exotic effects on all the cars that were parked near the buildings. They look like they completely melted after the effect of a very strong heating energy.
There's nothing like amateur propaganda.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
You can't see the bridge in some shots, because those are wide-angle images, not telephoto images, like we see in the copter shot.
FreqBand 2 years ago
Nice vid spark
chrysaor911 2 years ago
I'm not saying no explosives were used... micronukes and high velocity cutter charges were used 'to get the process going'
sparkoflifemedia 3 years ago
@sparkoflifemedia Where can someone get a copy of this with out the yellow markings.
doughauf 1 year ago
Not a layer error according to my theory, but a 3d scenario orientation error. Check my video about this
fresniak 3 years ago
What's your theory, let me know...
sparkoflifemedia 3 years ago
well my theory is that a 3d model of manhattan was used and the real pictures of the wtc were over-imposed on that model. Since the wtc are very tall building you can easily mask the lower part of the video and replace it with a 3d rendering. The bridge is no just moving, it's rotating around the wtc together with the rest of the fake 3d scenario
fresniak 3 years ago
I agree, 3D images mixed in with authentic footage.
sparkoflifemedia 3 years ago
But why are you stating that no explosives were used??
There were explosions. This is a fact that cannot be disputed, there are so many witnesses that speak about them.
Maybe some kind of direct energy weapon was used too. This would explain why the building was completely pulverized and also the exotic effects on all the cars that were parked near the buildings. They look like they completely melted after the effect of a very strong heating energy.
fresniak 3 years ago
Red Murcury Micro Nuke.
kevin604bc 3 years ago
huh?
sparkoflifemedia 3 years ago
I have a brand new theory.
Explosives moved the bridge...
and Perspective brought down the towers.
Now I think I'll start a blog about it.
And some videos too.
And if enough idiots follow me, I'll start a chat forum....where theories reign supreme, and real evidence and science is secondary.
FreqBand 3 years ago
Explosives don't do this huh? WRONG! Explosives do this exactly. DEW is a farce.
centrino105 3 years ago
Haha, sure.
sparkoflifemedia 3 years ago
This is turning into a farce..
the shot in question was taken 5 miles from the towers...
The amount of zoom needed from that distance to show the towers in detail caused the optical illusion..
If you can't accept that stop smoking the pot which is obviously turning 9/11 into one great illusion for you son..
thebeatprophet2 3 years ago
Great video man!
zezt 3 years ago