@Ferg Ferg, you're not good at all at making a point. You should be old enough to know that a simple opinion that is not substantiated is worthless. And, I don't think that you really are arguing about semantics. Who gives a shit about Gingrich or O'Reilly. They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch.
Ferg, you're not good at all at making a point. You should be old enough to know that a simple opinion that is not substantiated is worthless. And, I don't think that you really are arguing about semantics. Who gives a shit about Gingrich or O'Reilly. They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch.
@brucegrenehan1 ". They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch" I do know an opinion that is not substantiate. Sounds more like conspiracy to me. You happen to miss the point that these "corporate toadies" disagree with each other. rather profoundly at that.
I only use the DICTIONARY to define the term. If you want to argue if his policys are social leaning, that is different. The term, to me, fits him well. Even if your politicians are FURTHER left. That is not a valid point to the arguement I have made.
@17R3W read it, and its very weak. The court was giving a group the right to meet and discuss non god things. Regardless of how an apeals court fucks up, it doesn't change the facts.
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ferg Ferg, you're not good at all at making a point. You should be old enough to know that a simple opinion that is not substantiated is worthless. And, I don't think that you really are arguing about semantics. Who gives a shit about Gingrich or O'Reilly. They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch.
brucegrenehan1 1 year ago
Ferg, you're not good at all at making a point. You should be old enough to know that a simple opinion that is not substantiated is worthless. And, I don't think that you really are arguing about semantics. Who gives a shit about Gingrich or O'Reilly. They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch.
brucegrenehan1 1 year ago
@brucegrenehan1 ". They are both right wing corporate toadies who work for Rupert Murdoch" I do know an opinion that is not substantiate. Sounds more like conspiracy to me. You happen to miss the point that these "corporate toadies" disagree with each other. rather profoundly at that.
Do you have a point? or you just like to blab?
FergTubeAble 1 year ago
@StigandStigmatic
I only use the DICTIONARY to define the term. If you want to argue if his policys are social leaning, that is different. The term, to me, fits him well. Even if your politicians are FURTHER left. That is not a valid point to the arguement I have made.
FergTubeAble 1 year ago
RE: The editing. It's actually not bad.
You have a tripod (or at least some method of holding your camera still), and you are framed correctly with some headroom.
Three easy things you can fix.
1) If you film in 16x9, edit in 16:9. This will prevent YouTube putting a box around the whole thing.
2) If you want to do graphics use Powerpoint, and then save them as a jpeg.
An easy way to do this is to press "print screen", open paint, click edit -> paste and save.
17R3W 1 year ago
3) Try downloading the original video
if you want to use clips from it. There are
many ways to do this, ZamZar, Real player,
etc etc...
Then when you play the clip, use a lower
third (title) to identify the speaker.
17R3W 1 year ago
@17R3W
I have been able to download, but it takes soo very long... Just seems easier to pan the cam.
I have to try the powerpoint thing thou.
FergTubeAble 1 year ago
@17R3W
Thanks, I will look into that.
FergTubeAble 1 year ago
Actually according to the supreme court atheism is a religion.
17R3W 1 year ago
@17R3W
That is a major claim. What is the proof?
FergTubeAble 1 year ago
@FergTubeAble
My bad, it was a court of appeals.
If you want the story just Google "court rules atheism is a religion"
17R3W 1 year ago
@17R3W read it, and its very weak. The court was giving a group the right to meet and discuss non god things. Regardless of how an apeals court fucks up, it doesn't change the facts.
FergTubeAble 1 year ago