Evaluation is the principle of life. When you look at a colored man and a white man, you can see that there is an element of evaluation still in play.. A colored man i closer to a monkey than a white man.But a colored man is closer to a white human that a monkey.The colored man is closer to a white human that it is to a monkey. Racist rednecks don't see this.they name call and make uneducated statements like calling colored people monkey.That isn't true.
Yawn.....more clown boxing? If this is all anyone has after decades of this BS, i think both sides should give up, shut up, and start smoking crack in alleys and squats instead. At least they'd have an achievable goal to reach for each day. Shalom
@itssaab I think you'll find Jesus Christ sacrificing himself to his dad who is also himself for sins of other people that don't exist yet is self contradicting. How is it a sacrifice at all if he's immortal & ends up in heaven in a permanent state of bliss anyway? I also think you'll find that an omnibenevolent God that will send people to hell for all eternity simply for not believing in him is also self contradicting.
@itssaab This might be good! Well... I'm not an Atheist! You've started with an ussumption;
"youll do anything to stay away from a creator" You said that, but you don't know anything about me. So what are you then, if not a Christian? Pantheist? Polytheist? You like Japanese anime so I'm guessing your philosophy pertains to some kind of Gaia theory.. (admittedly I made an assumption too).. "evolution is self contradicting"... Now that's a statement your gonna have to explain!!
@itssaab I specifically said I wasn't an Atheist in my last response!
Life began 3.85 billion years ago (approx). There's micro-organisms that live for just a few seconds. There's 31.5 million seconds in a year. That gives 12,141,360,000,000,000 seconds for mutations to occur. There's LOTS of room for probability! An omnibenevolent God that grants free will but still sends people to hell for not believing in him is STILL self contradicting.Half the sentences in your comment didn't make sense btw
@itssaab "life doesnt appear every few seconds out of chemicals". You're confusing "abiogensis" with cell division, mutation ,genetic diversity, meiosis etc. The point was to show you the time scale that just 1 strain of life has been given to evolve. You can watch cell division in real-time under a miscroscope. Italian wall lizards (introduced to croatia in the 1970's) have evolved new digestive tracts, new jaw bone and skull structure in just 30 years. Evolution has been witnessed.
@MrLittletomdj epic fail. Confusing cell division with evolution, its no surprise your indoctrinated. Evolution is suppose to account for everything through random mutation, jumping to strawman like observable division doesnt save you from delusion.
@thegeniushasreturned Meiosis is a type of cell division necessary for sexual reproduction. The chromosomes in meiosis undergo a recombination which shuffles the genes producing different genetic combinations. Each of the resulting chromosomes is a unique mixture, ensuring that offspring are genetically distinct from the parents. This gives rise to genetic diversity upon which natural selection acts leading to adaptation resulting in evolution. This has been OBSERVED it is a FACT! Dickhead!
@MrLittletomdj half truth half lies not surprised. genetic shuffling is still basically fixed.
now back to your 2nd epic fail of the day
meiosis and sexual reproduction combined do not have the capacity to produce new information, the diversification is due to genes that are already there being swapped / mixed and some genes may become dominant whereas others become recessive etc.
@thegeniushasreturned There's no new information just new chemical bonds & genetic combinations.
"the diversification is due to genes that are..." Your arguement supports mine! The only difference is I know what I'm talking about. DIVERSIFICATION is EVOLUTION!
Are you capable of writing a comment without using the phraze Epic Fail? Are you typing this shit whilst simultaniously beating yourself round the head with a Qu'ran?
@MrLittletomdj common evolutionist delusion confusing micro changes, dna replication, and diversification as evolution. rejoicing at the fact it can be observed. This is sad i dont even know where to start.
maybe youll understand this if changes are solely due to meiosis and combining of genes from a male and a female, then selection will be only selecting a sub-set of the genetic info that was there in one of the parents.
i just find ignorance and evolutionist dogma pathetic.
@thegeniushasreturned When did I say evolution was solely due to meiosis? This where spontanious (molecular decay) or induced genetic mutation comes into play. Look up depurination, deamination & slipped strand mispairing for examples of spontanious decay. Induced genetic mutation is caused by new chemicals introduced into an organisms genetic environment (chemical bonding). I'm tired of being your unpaid, online tutor. Are you just trolling? Why not try reading a science book? Ignorant fuck.
@thegeniushasreturned I never claimed meiosis was the "cause" of evolution either! Nor did I claim that you claimed that I did, LOL. I also stated "There's no new information just new chemical bonds..." . Your third sentence didn't make any grammatical sense. If you're not too retarded, try rewriting it. No, I meant the thousands of science books and peer reviewed papers that are in popular circulation today. I'm sure you're just a fucking troll but, I'm quite enjoying venting my anger on you!
@thegeniushasreturned You've gotta be troll! Surely!??? I brought up grammar because I couldn't understand the sentence. When I write, I do it to convey a message, rather than just stringing a bunch of gobbledygook words together like you do. Do you even know what erecting a strawman means? Because you're not using it in the right context! Again, I'm concluding that you're either a troll or an idiot. You can fuck off & lose anytime you like btw.
@thegeniushasreturned ""evolution is self contradicting"" THATS YOUR VERY FIRST STATAMENT and you're yet to provide any evidence that it is. I pointed out a clear logical contradiction in your thoelogy "an omnibenevolent God that sends people to hell for all eternity simply for not believing in him". And you're yet to rebut that claim! So who's DIVERTING the issue? I'm NOT an Atheist. Evolution ISN'T a fairy tale or an ideology. That's 3 bits of misinformation yo delivered in 1 sentence!
stating that life evolved from simple to complex. The three main components to have life are ability to reproduce,digest food, get rid of waste. Theres your contradiction even your looney toon drawing in the textbooks dont save you from this. It has the characteristics of a fairy tale.
@thegeniushasreturned THATS NOT A CONTRADICTION, YOU FUCKING NITWIT! Do you even know what contradiction means? Your definition of life isn't even AT ALL accurate, even by the standards of basic GCSE school books (or whatever you Americans study at AGE 12!)
Again... For the 4TH TIME!!!
---
>>[[WHY would an ALL LOVING god NOT PRESENT HIMSELF, DECIEVE his children, CAST THEM BACK into disbelief & SEND THEM TO HELL??]]<<
@MrLittletomdj what are you talking about this is not my definition? this is the universal one. This is a clear contradiction care to even attempt to refute it.
God=all loving,good and just in punishment. You pay for what you do all actions have consequences good or bad. no contradiction in the creators qualities.
"what are you talking about this is not my definition?" <That is not a proper sentence, it makes no sense. "this is the universal one."< What is the universal one?
"This is a clear contradiction care to even attempt to refute it." What is a clear contradiction? What do you wan't me to refute?
An ALL LOVING God that sends people to HELL for not believing in him, whilst PURPOSELY DECIEVING them IS A CONTRADICTION. (Surah An-Nisa verse 88).
@thegeniushasreturned There's seven OTHER proposed common definitions of life to which you are ignorant.
I forgive the odd typo, missed comma, period, capital letter etc. As long as I can decipher the sentence, I don't care! But your grammar is so bad I can't tell what the fuck you're saying!
You say your God is not decieving? Yet he planted 1000's of transitional fossils in the ground & said "Allah cast them back to disbelief...Seek ye to guide him whom Allah hath sent astray?". What a CUNT!
@MrLittletomdj scientifically it is agreed upon that their are 3 core things of life, well most go even farther than that and say there are 7. Yet you can't accept this..
transitional form? i thought all fossils are transitional according to evotards, perhaps you mean to say there are 1000s of missing links? even that statement is ignorant. Name one so called missing link that is not under question or extreme suspect by the scientific community.
@MrLittletomdj scientifically it is agreed upon that their are 3 core things of life, well most go even farther than that and say there are 7. Yet you can't accept this..
transitional form? i thought all fossils are transitional according to evotards, perhaps you mean to say there are 1000s of missing links? even that statement is ignorant. Name one so called missing link that is not under question or extreme suspect by the scientific community.
@thegeniushasreturned I accept the 7 difining properties of life that you are refering to i.e metabolism, growth, response to stimuli, reproduction, homeostasis, adaption, organization... But, because I actually understand the scientific method, I also accept there are desputes over the definition of life. I have a degree in biology btw.
Yes all fossils are transitional forms! So you also except the fossil record? Which part of evolution don't you accept? I can't name one that is, can you?
@MrLittletomdj sure since only a maniac would deny this is the essence of life.
well the fossil record doesn't tell evolution, if you claim it does then their are at least 20,000 missing links between each species. Also your begging is a billion year gap.
few flaws of evolution: 1. natural selection is weak(not absolute)
2.mathematical probability against it.
3. logical entropy prohibits it
4. dna repair must be present at the beginning.
5. not empirical observable science but rag hypothesis
5. italian wall lizard wouldn't be darwininan evolution but "rapid evolution". However even that doesn't hold up to evidence. The cecal valves already existed in about 1% of the population.... this is not evolution.
@thegeniushasreturned The lizards adapted through breeding and natural selection (evolved). YES THIS IS EVOLUTION! You can tell because it's called "rapid EVOLUTION"!!! It only has a barings on an arguement between "punctuated equilibrium" and "gradualism". The cecal valves were JUST ONE of many STRIKING developements in the lizard's physiology. Its been observed! Its a FACT! These lizards evolved! We watched it happen. You don't need anymore evidence! Take your piss weak arguement elsewhere!
@MrLittletomdj so much excitement and hype only to be put back into your place by pure logic. i guess ill dumb it down for you this time.
cecal valves and other features were EPIGENTIC variations. In epigenetics phenotype expressions can change but the actual genotype remains identical. which means no new information has been added.
you honestly think this supports evolution?? please elaborate
@thegeniushasreturned NO!! There is NO "new" information, just information that is not present in the organism's past environment + spontainious genetic mutations which occur naturally. This is so basic!... Stop it! Just read something! You sound like a complete idiot! What's the point?? You're not convincing anyone, especially not here & especially not me.
@thegeniushasreturned don't you dare drag religion into your ignorance. People of faith believe facts as much as athiests, people of faith who don't believe the facts over a single book written before the facts could be known are worse than anyone they choose to attack based souly on that book.
@gleehmee people of indoctrination ignore facts cherry pick data and blindly believe in "evolution" disguising it as science. Faith is one thing, don't confuse it with fact.
@gleehmee grrrr.. phew.... THANKS! That guy has been driving me nuts for days. It's like talking to a brick wall with him. It's really sad that theological debates have devolved into this back & forth between Atheists & Theists. It's not like evolution has much baring on the nature of God anyway. "Is there a Purpose to life?" is the greatest question of all & it's buggered by these petty, simple minded arguements from ignorance.
@SuperMrAtheist I dont think that the hosts are experts. Some are experts? Okay like who? I am watching them because I watch just about anything on youtube. It just so happens that I was turned to this station by another clip.
@ManBat1066 WOW. Let me tell you how you are wrong in so many ways.lol First- Not all Atheist believe in Evolution. Atheism does not mean believing in evolution. There are Christians who believe in evolution.
Second- Evolution does not say humans come from monkeys. What moron told you that? They were wrong. Humans and monkeys share a common ancestor. IF you would read about evolution instead of listening to what others say then you would know this.
@kilip1 first the bible was written in 285 bc in Greek ... Why did god choose greek to deliver his message? Also the letter J did not come into existence until the 16th cent so what is his real name cos it ain't Jesus?
If you dont believe in the Bibel as Word of God, plz stop to talk about it, bcause you are calling a real Godjugment to your self while you are working and talking about and aguains the Bibel, it is not a simple game to talk about a God you dont know.. Plz remenber my friends, all those big people of he humanhistory who spoke against the Bible and Jesus without repenting are dead and waiting for the judgments..God lovs you...bless you in Jesus Name.
NO, we will not stop talking about it. I think that you are just afraid of us talking about it. The bible is becoming more and more proven wrong. The more people talk about it. The more it becomes a story and not truth. The funny thing is I bet I know more about the bible than you do.lol
Why do chritians almost always ask a question and then not hear the answer. They only want to preach there fairy tail reality. Talking to a christian is like talking to a fish. There is nothing there but glassy eyes. They open there mouth and down the rabbit hole we go. Delusion has griped it's claws to deep for reason to release them. They want to be Wonderland.
Chimpanzees are several times stronger, have superhuman short term memory - they are highly evolved, we may end up nuking the human race off the planet - therefore, excessively large primate brains - are deselected - because it doesn't work out.
Dear God: Please do something about the idiots among your followers. Some of your followers are smart, good people, but too many of them are ignorant fools without the slightest shred of rational thought, such as this caller. Please, Lord, either smite the stupid among your flock or raise their intellect to at least the level of a dried apricot. Thanks! (P.S. Say hello to Santa and the Easter Bunny for me!)
Life cannot be created from inorganic matter. So, it would take God the Creator to create life. If we evolved from apes why is it that there are still apes around.
@daogdaog "Life cannot be created from inorganic matter" what did God create Adam from let me think ah yes, Genesis 2 records that God first formed Adam out of "the dust of the ground" isn't dust inorganic matter and we didn't evolve from Apes, we had similar or the same ancestors, we are Apes, we didn't come from Apes, Chimps, Orangutans, Gorillas, Man are all modern Apes.
Okay, you have clearly never tried to understand ev. by reading basic science books. Man did not evolve from any of the great (chimps, gorillas, orangatans) or lesser (gibbons) apes. Rather both man and the apes evolved from earliear ape-type species now extinct. I believe scientists argue that our descent from chimps occurred about 7 million years ago.
Fossils of many hominid species (now extinct species that are more like humans than apes) have been found.
one of the most important is homo erectus, a shorter, and smaller brained hominid believed to be an ancestor of humanity but split off from the line of descent leading to modern apes. See also Neanderthals, astralopithicus, etc. I believe their have been genetic studies on Neanderthal remains, but i would want to check on that. what we can say for sure is that several human-like but less advanced (though actually neanderthals had bigger brains) species have existed and died out
one of the most useful ways to consider evolution is by looking at dogs. From anthropology, history, and particularly genetic studies we know that all dogs have been bred from the wolf, over approximately 15,000 years. from this common ancestor, chihuahuas and great danes, daschunds and st. bernards have all descended! and how was this diversity created? by non random breeding that emphasized various traits.
I should've been more clear. Scientists have concluded based on DNA studies that ALL dogs are COMPLETELY descended from wolves. For this reason the dog (all breeds) is now considered part of the Canus lupus species (the wolf) officially.
Basically the dog first arose from the breeding of individual wolves with traits that made them suitable for living and working with humans, such as low fear of people, docility, etc. A currentRussian study has bred tame foxes similar to dogs
It is believed that the process began about 15000 years ago and that either humans captured wolves and began to breed them selectively or that this may have been preceded by natural shifts toward tameness among wolves that fed off carcasses left by humans and which were therefore more likely to survive if they were naturally less frightened by people,
The point is that today we have wolves, great danes, bulldogs, and chihuahuas and so on all descended from the same species
@Daniel0112358 I agree that differnt breeds of dogs come from breeding and thus change there physical as well as mental attributes. But if it all started as a wolf what was the animal that caused the fairly drastic changes changes in physical traits if every dog was some species of wolf?
There was no other animal in the ancestry of the dog. In every population of a species, there is some variation in all traits. If particular traits are selected for breeding, this alters each successive generation's distribution of traits, and the changes compounds. So, at first more of the more docile wolves might survive while living near humans and eating from hunters left over carcasses. then people might have captured some and only bred more tame and faster wolf-dogs
Then, once they produced useful hunting and hauling dogs that were much like wolves but tame, they could of course select whatever they wanted in controlling breeding: extreme endurance to produce really good sled dogs, better attention to commands and controlled aggression for hunting dogs, and of course, whatever they thought looked cool. or size for war dogs like the ancient mastiffs, which also got bred for loose skin supposedly so that if they were bit it wouldnt just b skin
I mean, horses aren't as diverse looking, but it's the same deal, they all descend from a type of wild central Asian horse, but today there are Arabian thoroughbreds bred for speed, quarterhorses, miniature ponies bred to look funny, etc. by the same mechanism of emphasizing different traits from the same population, taking advantage of the small variations in each generation of a population, which are compounded over time
@Leftibfibsfx It's not like a wolf got pregnant and gave birth to a great dane. It's about small changes over many generations. As mutations show up, beneficial ones are selectively bred to be more prominent, like dachshunds were bred to hunt burrowing animals. Perhaps the large pups were bred with other large pups resulting in large offspring, eventually giving us St. Bernards. Runts bred with other runts resulting in smaller offspring that made good pets for the kids giving us terriers.
at least since ppl began consciously breeding dogs, they have done this deliberately: putting the fastest and most athletic together to breed greyhounds, quick and intelligent dogs to breed herders, and ridiculous shit like hairlessness, broad shouldered bulldogs, and little pooches that can sit in ladies laps. So, from this we KNOW for a fact that significant patterns in the breeding of animals can produce over time systematic and extreme changes in the offspring
despite lack of knowledge of how or if (for sure) life originated naturally on earth, we DO know from fossils that there have been bacteria here for over 2 billion years. moreover, we have learned, since Darwin, a very logical explanation of how individuals pass characteristics to offspring and how those traits evolve: DNA, which is share by all life from bact. to humans, and which very interestingly function son the same set of 64 3 letter (base) codes for the various
Douchebag. 'You beliiiiii*voice crack*ve that we cuame frum munkays!?" Lol. They don't teach evolution in Elementary school. Atleast not enough to argue for or against it. I didn't go in depth until High School. Clearly the only education this man has is "Elumuntry" school.
If you put a naked human in the jungle no weapons no nothing at all do you think that person would survive? if you put an ape/monkey in the jungle it will survive because it has adapted, we mammals are kind of like them but we are blessed we have a larger brain which can be the most dangerous weapon on earth, we cant survive in a physical way but we improvise and create things, where as an ape/monkey survives in a physical matter
The caller is a ninny, in my opinion in how we came about is not from a damn monkey or ape because how come they monkey/ape isnt human now? there shouldn't be any monke/ape around today, in my opinion i think we were dropped off in different parts of the earth in the very beginning, the white people lived in the colder regions as the black people live in the hotter region but i reckon we started off as a bronze colour and over thousands of years we developed pigment in the skin.
@WitchHunter93 how can you be so narrow minded when you see how many stars there are in the universe
we are weak feeble defenceless creatures i am certain that we are pre adapted for earth otherwise we would be just food to the other creatures but fortunately we have a pre adapted brain, but on the other hand earth has been destroyed many times through out history, in the last 200 years we have advanced in tech, what happened to the last 20,000 years? where is our history?
we've evolved in a way where we don't depend on physical strength or agility. i can assure you that our ancestors were much stronger than we are today, however they were much dumber. even so, if they were smart enough to sharpen a long stick and work together to kill a big animal they would survive.
like many other species, we migrated, those who were smarter survived. the ones who weren't smart enough would die off
we're not pre-adapted to anything, our characteristics evolve
and if i remember correctly, the lowest the human population has ever been is about 18,000 by the end of the ice age. we've managed to survive many huge disasters such as supervolcanoes
nothing points to us getting dropped with a pre-existing intelligence, assuming that we were with no evidence is nothing more than a blind guess
@WitchHunter93 my god you are so narrow minded, so what happened to the last 50,000 years? look up niburu and planet x they seem to be the ones that have altered the humans
Why the hell didn't he just tell the guy that we share common ancestry with apes?? If he just ignores the improper question it'll cause continued confusion and eventually just what we saw. The entire call was a waste, even though I wasn't expecting much.
AE was wrong this time.
I miss Matt & Tracie. They are the best at debating, and at explaining the issues at hand.
@Cootabux i dont like these to hosts.. but like the show. matt is the best but i think these 2 are really weak and sometimes dodge the questions n it looks really weak.
Haha, "believe in evolution"?? Evolution is a fact, not "believing in it" is like "not believing in" gravity for instance. Where did that hick go to school? Maybe he was homeschooled by other ignorants?: )
@winterstellar It's not a fact, it's the best explanation yet according to the scientific community. Facts don't exist because we can only interpret what we measure or sense.
Christian belief is not christian belife, it's only one by one, yes, one by one human pushed to death, without our conciousness, there is an answer to this, this is too little sick, to know, true is not what our minds are thinking, more and more you can get of this, but we are humans, we oppose to others at the beginning, then chaos is done, think what you believe? no, think what you feel you are, without any influences because you are one within. Is religion really means something for you?
Simple shit: Evolution is a tree of life, not a ladder of inheritance; you can only get a ladder if you chop down a tree & make it yourself, that is what Creationists need to learn
Yes, everyone knows this. Sadly the fundie can't get their heads out of their asses and accept modern science. Being humble is supposed to be a christian value and yet they hardly act humble at all. Perhaps the most humbling aspect of science is that we learned we evolved from an ape-like ancestor.
man came from monkey....how the hell!!! the earth cooled from a hot lava type thing and produced vapor, then water then came bacteria and then amphibians and then reptiles then mammals...this crap doesnt add up....
@jonathanscar The Earth cooled, over a very, Very long period of time. Amino acids either arrived on earth by extra-terrestrial means or developed from chemicals on earth at the time. Amino acid, when electricity is applied in the right conditions, can possibly make the simplest possible form of life. Then over an unfathomably long period of time, this lifeform grew into bacteria, becoming more and more complex. Bacteria to tiny sea creatures, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and boom! Human!
It makes perfect sense because over the course of many, many generation animals (and non-animals) will change bodily structures and become something else. This has been proven over and over. Your mind must not be able to grasp the concept.
How do you think dogs exist? Humans created dogs from wolves through a process called natural selection, which is an application of evolution.
Humans didn't evolve from monkeys. Modern humans and modern monkeys had a common ancestor. Monkeys are just as evolved as humans. Thats why humans didn't evolve from monkeys... It really isn't that hard. :/
@antonkhuu Technically, modern humans ARE apes. So it would be correct to say we evolved from a common ancestor who was also an ape. We also had an ancestor that was a fish if you look back far enough.
@2Pains1Love I think in his case, the caller may have actually come from his brother or sister. I think a chromosome was lost (or gained) in the genetic exchange between his parents.
I could barely understand the caller lol I....I just can't take these people seriously sometimes....either way they handled it nicely. Good for a belly laugh I suppose.
@2Pains1Love lol i love how evolutionist think their so right and they make fun of creationist saying our belife is unscientific yet you believe that the world exploded out of nothing and by chance it created complex and well structured universe? XD so you might as well say that computers evolved out of old scrap metal
The BB was not an explosion nor does anyone say it came from nothing and comparing evolution to computers is fallacious. We have something you will never have, evidence.
We are fucking apes, we came from earlier fucking apes, and we are here because they fucked.
aaqucnaona94 5 days ago
brilliant video
bribribri56 1 week ago
Bonehead.
stevenhorr 1 month ago
Evaluation is the principle of life. When you look at a colored man and a white man, you can see that there is an element of evaluation still in play.. A colored man i closer to a monkey than a white man.But a colored man is closer to a white human that a monkey.The colored man is closer to a white human that it is to a monkey. Racist rednecks don't see this.they name call and make uneducated statements like calling colored people monkey.That isn't true.
1976GGus1 1 month ago
Hmm the more clips I watch from the Atheist Experience the more stupid the callers get. This guy can hardly even talk anymore..
Chris197980CH 1 month ago
Yawn.....more clown boxing? If this is all anyone has after decades of this BS, i think both sides should give up, shut up, and start smoking crack in alleys and squats instead. At least they'd have an achievable goal to reach for each day. Shalom
TRUTHISIAM 2 months ago
You should have told this caller that most of us evolved, but apparently not all.
hznfrst 2 months ago 2
why are rednecks retarded?
TheGrimReapress 2 months ago
this guy is retarded XD
BlarkUntVhite 3 months ago
Good grief, this sounds like one of the most ignorant people in the world. Plus he sounds drunk. That's the perfect time to discuss religion.
Hornadayfan 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
Gramps sounds like he had a few too many pulls off the family cough medicine.
Mrshawnst33 4 months ago
typical redneck religious american
TiSLuKe 5 months ago 15
@TiSLuKe honestly? I'm hoping it's just a prank caller.
gleehmee 4 months ago
@TiSLuKe wow, this caller is giving us southerners a bad name. I'm from Eastern Kentucky and I don't talk like that!
jb111082 2 weeks ago
The stupidity of these callers, alone, is enough to make one stop believing.
Z0mbeSlayer 5 months ago 10
actually man is a monkey, so therefore - we havent gone far from monkey, we're still there ;)
alonderis 5 months ago
@alonderis
Ape*
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@alonderis I don`t wish to be a pedant, but we are apes, monkeys are a subspecies of apes.
sheikhyaboooty 5 months ago
@sheikhyaboooty ok. sorry, i always mix those 2 up....
alonderis 5 months ago
Do christians get hammered after church and call in?
Keys0penD00RS 5 months ago
ape men myths haha funny
evolution is self contradicting
itssaab 5 months ago
@itssaab Herp derp I'm gonna troll real hard.
thewarriorsrok 5 months ago
@itssaab <--- IDIOT!!!
Z0mbeSlayer 5 months ago
@itssaab I think you'll find Jesus Christ sacrificing himself to his dad who is also himself for sins of other people that don't exist yet is self contradicting. How is it a sacrifice at all if he's immortal & ends up in heaven in a permanent state of bliss anyway? I also think you'll find that an omnibenevolent God that will send people to hell for all eternity simply for not believing in him is also self contradicting.
MrLittletomdj 5 months ago
@MrLittletomdj this is why you are indoctrinated. youll do anything to stay away from a creator.
in case your wondering im not a christian, but to call things contradicting and spread misinformation is dangerous even for an atheist
itssaab 5 months ago
@itssaab This might be good! Well... I'm not an Atheist! You've started with an ussumption;
"youll do anything to stay away from a creator" You said that, but you don't know anything about me. So what are you then, if not a Christian? Pantheist? Polytheist? You like Japanese anime so I'm guessing your philosophy pertains to some kind of Gaia theory.. (admittedly I made an assumption too).. "evolution is self contradicting"... Now that's a statement your gonna have to explain!!
MrLittletomdj 5 months ago
@MrLittletomdj you are an atheist you defend ape men fairy tales which promote the ideology of "chance"
i am a muslim by the way.
yes very simple life needs to metabolize food, get rid of waste, reproduce, convert energy to survive.
darwin evolution claims from simple to complex, these are the most complex things in all of life.
if you want to go farther into it it is actually a theory of probability and once you actually look at the odds its a weak one at best.
itssaab 5 months ago
@itssaab I specifically said I wasn't an Atheist in my last response!
Life began 3.85 billion years ago (approx). There's micro-organisms that live for just a few seconds. There's 31.5 million seconds in a year. That gives 12,141,360,000,000,000 seconds for mutations to occur. There's LOTS of room for probability! An omnibenevolent God that grants free will but still sends people to hell for not believing in him is STILL self contradicting.Half the sentences in your comment didn't make sense btw
MrLittletomdj 5 months ago
@MrLittletomdj another epic fail keep it up
life doesnt appear every few seconds out of chemicals !
in order for it to even survive it must reproduce metabolize food get rid of waste and convert energy
here we have a miracle greater then all numbers any man can count to
your welcome try again and again but please a better argument
itssaab 4 months ago
@itssaab "life doesnt appear every few seconds out of chemicals". You're confusing "abiogensis" with cell division, mutation ,genetic diversity, meiosis etc. The point was to show you the time scale that just 1 strain of life has been given to evolve. You can watch cell division in real-time under a miscroscope. Italian wall lizards (introduced to croatia in the 1970's) have evolved new digestive tracts, new jaw bone and skull structure in just 30 years. Evolution has been witnessed.
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj epic fail. Confusing cell division with evolution, its no surprise your indoctrinated. Evolution is suppose to account for everything through random mutation, jumping to strawman like observable division doesnt save you from delusion.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned Meiosis is a type of cell division necessary for sexual reproduction. The chromosomes in meiosis undergo a recombination which shuffles the genes producing different genetic combinations. Each of the resulting chromosomes is a unique mixture, ensuring that offspring are genetically distinct from the parents. This gives rise to genetic diversity upon which natural selection acts leading to adaptation resulting in evolution. This has been OBSERVED it is a FACT! Dickhead!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj half truth half lies not surprised. genetic shuffling is still basically fixed.
now back to your 2nd epic fail of the day
meiosis and sexual reproduction combined do not have the capacity to produce new information, the diversification is due to genes that are already there being swapped / mixed and some genes may become dominant whereas others become recessive etc.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned There's no new information just new chemical bonds & genetic combinations.
"the diversification is due to genes that are..." Your arguement supports mine! The only difference is I know what I'm talking about. DIVERSIFICATION is EVOLUTION!
Are you capable of writing a comment without using the phraze Epic Fail? Are you typing this shit whilst simultaniously beating yourself round the head with a Qu'ran?
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj common evolutionist delusion confusing micro changes, dna replication, and diversification as evolution. rejoicing at the fact it can be observed. This is sad i dont even know where to start.
maybe youll understand this if changes are solely due to meiosis and combining of genes from a male and a female, then selection will be only selecting a sub-set of the genetic info that was there in one of the parents.
i just find ignorance and evolutionist dogma pathetic.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned When did I say evolution was solely due to meiosis? This where spontanious (molecular decay) or induced genetic mutation comes into play. Look up depurination, deamination & slipped strand mispairing for examples of spontanious decay. Induced genetic mutation is caused by new chemicals introduced into an organisms genetic environment (chemical bonding). I'm tired of being your unpaid, online tutor. Are you just trolling? Why not try reading a science book? Ignorant fuck.
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj again misreading my comment all i said was meiosis is NOT evolution.
evolution dogma at its finest EMPIRICAL evidence shows no increase of information due to meiosis.
new information can come from mutations, but no ones that diluted to account it for all things are they now?
you mean the science book which still has the moths as proof for evidence of evolution years after the fraud? yea i read it.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned I never claimed meiosis was the "cause" of evolution either! Nor did I claim that you claimed that I did, LOL. I also stated "There's no new information just new chemical bonds..." . Your third sentence didn't make any grammatical sense. If you're not too retarded, try rewriting it. No, I meant the thousands of science books and peer reviewed papers that are in popular circulation today. I'm sure you're just a fucking troll but, I'm quite enjoying venting my anger on you!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj then stop preaching meiosis as if you worship it :/
backing down on grammar because of no further logic left inside you.
appealing to authority as all other evolutionist do when they realize there strawmans backfired.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned You've gotta be troll! Surely!??? I brought up grammar because I couldn't understand the sentence. When I write, I do it to convey a message, rather than just stringing a bunch of gobbledygook words together like you do. Do you even know what erecting a strawman means? Because you're not using it in the right context! Again, I'm concluding that you're either a troll or an idiot. You can fuck off & lose anytime you like btw.
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj a message or diverting the problem away from yourself ?
conclude what you like however now that you understand meiosis isn't evolution don't spread any more misinformation.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned ""evolution is self contradicting"" THATS YOUR VERY FIRST STATAMENT and you're yet to provide any evidence that it is. I pointed out a clear logical contradiction in your thoelogy "an omnibenevolent God that sends people to hell for all eternity simply for not believing in him". And you're yet to rebut that claim! So who's DIVERTING the issue? I'm NOT an Atheist. Evolution ISN'T a fairy tale or an ideology. That's 3 bits of misinformation yo delivered in 1 sentence!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj evolution is self contradicting
stating that life evolved from simple to complex. The three main components to have life are ability to reproduce,digest food, get rid of waste. Theres your contradiction even your looney toon drawing in the textbooks dont save you from this. It has the characteristics of a fairy tale.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned THATS NOT A CONTRADICTION, YOU FUCKING NITWIT! Do you even know what contradiction means? Your definition of life isn't even AT ALL accurate, even by the standards of basic GCSE school books (or whatever you Americans study at AGE 12!)
Again... For the 4TH TIME!!!
---
>>[[WHY would an ALL LOVING god NOT PRESENT HIMSELF, DECIEVE his children, CAST THEM BACK into disbelief & SEND THEM TO HELL??]]<<
---
That's a contradiction!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj what are you talking about this is not my definition? this is the universal one. This is a clear contradiction care to even attempt to refute it.
God=all loving,good and just in punishment. You pay for what you do all actions have consequences good or bad. no contradiction in the creators qualities.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned
"what are you talking about this is not my definition?" <That is not a proper sentence, it makes no sense. "this is the universal one."< What is the universal one?
"This is a clear contradiction care to even attempt to refute it." What is a clear contradiction? What do you wan't me to refute?
An ALL LOVING God that sends people to HELL for not believing in him, whilst PURPOSELY DECIEVING them IS A CONTRADICTION. (Surah An-Nisa verse 88).
---
LEARN HOW TO READ & WRITE!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj attacking grammar because your pathetic atheist dogma holds no wait.
there are actually 7things that classify something as alive google it!
there is no deception unless your a sheep who blindly follows a handful of elitist in the disguise of evolution.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned There's seven OTHER proposed common definitions of life to which you are ignorant.
I forgive the odd typo, missed comma, period, capital letter etc. As long as I can decipher the sentence, I don't care! But your grammar is so bad I can't tell what the fuck you're saying!
You say your God is not decieving? Yet he planted 1000's of transitional fossils in the ground & said "Allah cast them back to disbelief...Seek ye to guide him whom Allah hath sent astray?". What a CUNT!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj scientifically it is agreed upon that their are 3 core things of life, well most go even farther than that and say there are 7. Yet you can't accept this..
transitional form? i thought all fossils are transitional according to evotards, perhaps you mean to say there are 1000s of missing links? even that statement is ignorant. Name one so called missing link that is not under question or extreme suspect by the scientific community.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj scientifically it is agreed upon that their are 3 core things of life, well most go even farther than that and say there are 7. Yet you can't accept this..
transitional form? i thought all fossils are transitional according to evotards, perhaps you mean to say there are 1000s of missing links? even that statement is ignorant. Name one so called missing link that is not under question or extreme suspect by the scientific community.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned I accept the 7 difining properties of life that you are refering to i.e metabolism, growth, response to stimuli, reproduction, homeostasis, adaption, organization... But, because I actually understand the scientific method, I also accept there are desputes over the definition of life. I have a degree in biology btw.
Yes all fossils are transitional forms! So you also except the fossil record? Which part of evolution don't you accept? I can't name one that is, can you?
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj sure since only a maniac would deny this is the essence of life.
well the fossil record doesn't tell evolution, if you claim it does then their are at least 20,000 missing links between each species. Also your begging is a billion year gap.
few flaws of evolution: 1. natural selection is weak(not absolute)
2.mathematical probability against it.
3. logical entropy prohibits it
4. dna repair must be present at the beginning.
5. not empirical observable science but rag hypothesis
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned
The fossil record isn't complete because very specific circumstances are required.
1.By that do you mean natural selection operates by comparative advantage? If so, yes that's right & so what?
2.The mechanics of abiogenesis aren't fully understood thus probability is redundant.
3.No it doesn't.
4.No it doesn't. The Beginning of what? Are you talking about abiogenesis again?
5.Wrong, it has been observed as I stated with "italian wall lizards" example (which you ignored).
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj fossil record= pathetic excuse. the claim that no fossils are left or were destroyed is old and doesnt decieve people anymore.
1. no it doesnt work how evolution needs it to work for example over 4500 genetic defects in humans alone which should not exist.
2.tell that to the mathmeticians who calculated it out numerous times.
3. logical entropy prohibits energy to further complexity without a certain type of "machinery"
4.first creature must have dna repair.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj continued
5. italian wall lizard wouldn't be darwininan evolution but "rapid evolution". However even that doesn't hold up to evidence. The cecal valves already existed in about 1% of the population.... this is not evolution.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned The lizards adapted through breeding and natural selection (evolved). YES THIS IS EVOLUTION! You can tell because it's called "rapid EVOLUTION"!!! It only has a barings on an arguement between "punctuated equilibrium" and "gradualism". The cecal valves were JUST ONE of many STRIKING developements in the lizard's physiology. Its been observed! Its a FACT! These lizards evolved! We watched it happen. You don't need anymore evidence! Take your piss weak arguement elsewhere!
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj so much excitement and hype only to be put back into your place by pure logic. i guess ill dumb it down for you this time.
cecal valves and other features were EPIGENTIC variations. In epigenetics phenotype expressions can change but the actual genotype remains identical. which means no new information has been added.
you honestly think this supports evolution?? please elaborate
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned NO!! There is NO "new" information, just information that is not present in the organism's past environment + spontainious genetic mutations which occur naturally. This is so basic!... Stop it! Just read something! You sound like a complete idiot! What's the point?? You're not convincing anyone, especially not here & especially not me.
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj this was not the result of mutation. This ability already existed google epigenetics itll help you
Evolution=natural selection+mutation
Theres no convincing you, u dont care for truth just defending your religion.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned don't you dare drag religion into your ignorance. People of faith believe facts as much as athiests, people of faith who don't believe the facts over a single book written before the facts could be known are worse than anyone they choose to attack based souly on that book.
gleehmee 4 months ago
@gleehmee people of indoctrination ignore facts cherry pick data and blindly believe in "evolution" disguising it as science. Faith is one thing, don't confuse it with fact.
thegeniushasreturned 4 months ago
@thegeniushasreturned evolution is a fact. Anyone who undstands science understands that. Creationism is dead, find a new doctorine.
gleehmee 4 months ago 2
@MrLittletomdj Yay! another non-atheist willing to stand up agaisnt the brainwashing and ignorance enfiorcement in our great species!
gleehmee 4 months ago
@gleehmee grrrr.. phew.... THANKS! That guy has been driving me nuts for days. It's like talking to a brick wall with him. It's really sad that theological debates have devolved into this back & forth between Atheists & Theists. It's not like evolution has much baring on the nature of God anyway. "Is there a Purpose to life?" is the greatest question of all & it's buggered by these petty, simple minded arguements from ignorance.
MrLittletomdj 4 months ago
@MrLittletomdj in the words of our forefathers: oo ee ah ah ee ee ee oo
makes as much sense as some of the arguments we're faced with :)
gleehmee 4 months ago
@SuperMrAtheist I dont think that the hosts are experts. Some are experts? Okay like who? I am watching them because I watch just about anything on youtube. It just so happens that I was turned to this station by another clip.
oscarone1982 6 months ago
@ManBat1066 Oh what a cruel devil...
makheyi 6 months ago
@ManBat1066 WOW. Let me tell you how you are wrong in so many ways.lol First- Not all Atheist believe in Evolution. Atheism does not mean believing in evolution. There are Christians who believe in evolution.
Second- Evolution does not say humans come from monkeys. What moron told you that? They were wrong. Humans and monkeys share a common ancestor. IF you would read about evolution instead of listening to what others say then you would know this.
Everything in the bible has been proven wrong.
SuperMrAtheist 6 months ago
IMO they should have hung up on the caller a lot earlier than that...
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 6 months ago
I dont understand why people listen to these guys. They arent even experts or scholars.
oscarone1982 6 months ago
@oscarone1982 Some of them are experts but that doesn't matter. They are Atheist talking about Atheism. lol Why are you even watching them?
SuperMrAtheist 6 months ago
@kilip1 first the bible was written in 285 bc in Greek ... Why did god choose greek to deliver his message? Also the letter J did not come into existence until the 16th cent so what is his real name cos it ain't Jesus?
mobfiggak1 6 months ago
If you dont believe in the Bibel as Word of God, plz stop to talk about it, bcause you are calling a real Godjugment to your self while you are working and talking about and aguains the Bibel, it is not a simple game to talk about a God you dont know.. Plz remenber my friends, all those big people of he humanhistory who spoke against the Bible and Jesus without repenting are dead and waiting for the judgments..God lovs you...bless you in Jesus Name.
kilip1 6 months ago
NO, we will not stop talking about it. I think that you are just afraid of us talking about it. The bible is becoming more and more proven wrong. The more people talk about it. The more it becomes a story and not truth. The funny thing is I bet I know more about the bible than you do.lol
SuperMrAtheist 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think the caller is a neanderthal :-) But he doesn't believe in evolution :-P
aboyborninjune 6 months ago
Why do chritians almost always ask a question and then not hear the answer. They only want to preach there fairy tail reality. Talking to a christian is like talking to a fish. There is nothing there but glassy eyes. They open there mouth and down the rabbit hole we go. Delusion has griped it's claws to deep for reason to release them. They want to be Wonderland.
scotttebben 6 months ago
0:09 in, ``UhhhuuHHHUUUUhuuuu, do you believe in evolution.`` LOL
Verosthenes 6 months ago 18
Comment removed
Verosthenes 6 months ago
Comment removed
Verosthenes 6 months ago
Chimpanzees are several times stronger, have superhuman short term memory - they are highly evolved, we may end up nuking the human race off the planet - therefore, excessively large primate brains - are deselected - because it doesn't work out.
superhamzah85 6 months ago
Dear God: Please do something about the idiots among your followers. Some of your followers are smart, good people, but too many of them are ignorant fools without the slightest shred of rational thought, such as this caller. Please, Lord, either smite the stupid among your flock or raise their intellect to at least the level of a dried apricot. Thanks! (P.S. Say hello to Santa and the Easter Bunny for me!)
paxpaul 7 months ago
THEY TOOK UR JUUUUBS!!!!!!
arklowrockz 7 months ago
Squeal miss piggy!
lewisner 7 months ago
Life cannot be created from inorganic matter. So, it would take God the Creator to create life. If we evolved from apes why is it that there are still apes around.
daogdaog 7 months ago
@daogdaog
"Life cannot be created from inorganic matter"
How do you know this?
"If we evolved from apes why is it that there are still apes around"
We didn't evolve from apes. We have a common ancestor.
My cousin is Italian. He had a child with a Domincan woman and the child looks Dominican and will be raised in a Dominican home.
The Italian family will still continue on to be Italian in heritage.
They simply branch off.
boyinthedrain 7 months ago
@daogdaog "Life cannot be created from inorganic matter" what did God create Adam from let me think ah yes, Genesis 2 records that God first formed Adam out of "the dust of the ground" isn't dust inorganic matter and we didn't evolve from Apes, we had similar or the same ancestors, we are Apes, we didn't come from Apes, Chimps, Orangutans, Gorillas, Man are all modern Apes.
jethropike1964 7 months ago
@daogdaog
Okay, you have clearly never tried to understand ev. by reading basic science books. Man did not evolve from any of the great (chimps, gorillas, orangatans) or lesser (gibbons) apes. Rather both man and the apes evolved from earliear ape-type species now extinct. I believe scientists argue that our descent from chimps occurred about 7 million years ago.
Fossils of many hominid species (now extinct species that are more like humans than apes) have been found.
Daniel0112358 7 months ago
sorry, that should say "divergence" not "descent"
ie we are "cousins", not descendents of modern ape species
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@daogdaog
one of the most important is homo erectus, a shorter, and smaller brained hominid believed to be an ancestor of humanity but split off from the line of descent leading to modern apes. See also Neanderthals, astralopithicus, etc. I believe their have been genetic studies on Neanderthal remains, but i would want to check on that. what we can say for sure is that several human-like but less advanced (though actually neanderthals had bigger brains) species have existed and died out
Daniel0112358 7 months ago
@daogdaog
one of the most useful ways to consider evolution is by looking at dogs. From anthropology, history, and particularly genetic studies we know that all dogs have been bred from the wolf, over approximately 15,000 years. from this common ancestor, chihuahuas and great danes, daschunds and st. bernards have all descended! and how was this diversity created? by non random breeding that emphasized various traits.
Daniel0112358 7 months ago
@Daniel0112358 Then what may I ask was the original thing that was bred with the wolf to start these changes from a wolf to a common dog.
Leftibfibsfx 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx
I should've been more clear. Scientists have concluded based on DNA studies that ALL dogs are COMPLETELY descended from wolves. For this reason the dog (all breeds) is now considered part of the Canus lupus species (the wolf) officially.
Basically the dog first arose from the breeding of individual wolves with traits that made them suitable for living and working with humans, such as low fear of people, docility, etc. A currentRussian study has bred tame foxes similar to dogs
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx
It is believed that the process began about 15000 years ago and that either humans captured wolves and began to breed them selectively or that this may have been preceded by natural shifts toward tameness among wolves that fed off carcasses left by humans and which were therefore more likely to survive if they were naturally less frightened by people,
The point is that today we have wolves, great danes, bulldogs, and chihuahuas and so on all descended from the same species
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@Daniel0112358 I agree that differnt breeds of dogs come from breeding and thus change there physical as well as mental attributes. But if it all started as a wolf what was the animal that caused the fairly drastic changes changes in physical traits if every dog was some species of wolf?
Leftibfibsfx 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx
There was no other animal in the ancestry of the dog. In every population of a species, there is some variation in all traits. If particular traits are selected for breeding, this alters each successive generation's distribution of traits, and the changes compounds. So, at first more of the more docile wolves might survive while living near humans and eating from hunters left over carcasses. then people might have captured some and only bred more tame and faster wolf-dogs
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx
Then, once they produced useful hunting and hauling dogs that were much like wolves but tame, they could of course select whatever they wanted in controlling breeding: extreme endurance to produce really good sled dogs, better attention to commands and controlled aggression for hunting dogs, and of course, whatever they thought looked cool. or size for war dogs like the ancient mastiffs, which also got bred for loose skin supposedly so that if they were bit it wouldnt just b skin
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx
I mean, horses aren't as diverse looking, but it's the same deal, they all descend from a type of wild central Asian horse, but today there are Arabian thoroughbreds bred for speed, quarterhorses, miniature ponies bred to look funny, etc. by the same mechanism of emphasizing different traits from the same population, taking advantage of the small variations in each generation of a population, which are compounded over time
Daniel0112358 6 months ago
@Leftibfibsfx It's not like a wolf got pregnant and gave birth to a great dane. It's about small changes over many generations. As mutations show up, beneficial ones are selectively bred to be more prominent, like dachshunds were bred to hunt burrowing animals. Perhaps the large pups were bred with other large pups resulting in large offspring, eventually giving us St. Bernards. Runts bred with other runts resulting in smaller offspring that made good pets for the kids giving us terriers.
pyrobryan 6 months ago
@daogdaog
at least since ppl began consciously breeding dogs, they have done this deliberately: putting the fastest and most athletic together to breed greyhounds, quick and intelligent dogs to breed herders, and ridiculous shit like hairlessness, broad shouldered bulldogs, and little pooches that can sit in ladies laps. So, from this we KNOW for a fact that significant patterns in the breeding of animals can produce over time systematic and extreme changes in the offspring
Daniel0112358 7 months ago
@daogdaog
despite lack of knowledge of how or if (for sure) life originated naturally on earth, we DO know from fossils that there have been bacteria here for over 2 billion years. moreover, we have learned, since Darwin, a very logical explanation of how individuals pass characteristics to offspring and how those traits evolve: DNA, which is share by all life from bact. to humans, and which very interestingly function son the same set of 64 3 letter (base) codes for the various
Daniel0112358 7 months ago
"BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY" OR "BELIEVE IN JESUS BEFORE TOO LATE"
THE END IS COMING SOON WITH SUDDEN DESTRUCTION ON EARTH.
fuckmania07 7 months ago
Matt would have tore this guy a new asshole.
Steelmoon17 7 months ago
He's retarded
carlinhos5000 7 months ago
How amusing.. The missing link phones in to try and disprove evolution.
MrLittletomdj 7 months ago 30
@MrLittletomdj You are a genius! I have been laughing my head off! Thanks for that!
samenobangohan 6 months ago
@MrLittletomdj I have never laugh so hard by reading a comment. spot on!!! ty :))))) rofl
atheistzeus 5 months ago
@MrLittletomdj :D
Grey13Human 5 months ago
hahah that guy was like abla bala bla gar as rasr
dylan111291 8 months ago
Douchebag. 'You beliiiiii*voice crack*ve that we cuame frum munkays!?" Lol. They don't teach evolution in Elementary school. Atleast not enough to argue for or against it. I didn't go in depth until High School. Clearly the only education this man has is "Elumuntry" school.
Stupid stupid man.
IsolationInstigation 8 months ago
If you put a naked human in the jungle no weapons no nothing at all do you think that person would survive? if you put an ape/monkey in the jungle it will survive because it has adapted, we mammals are kind of like them but we are blessed we have a larger brain which can be the most dangerous weapon on earth, we cant survive in a physical way but we improvise and create things, where as an ape/monkey survives in a physical matter
NZgeisha 8 months ago
The caller is a ninny, in my opinion in how we came about is not from a damn monkey or ape because how come they monkey/ape isnt human now? there shouldn't be any monke/ape around today, in my opinion i think we were dropped off in different parts of the earth in the very beginning, the white people lived in the colder regions as the black people live in the hotter region but i reckon we started off as a bronze colour and over thousands of years we developed pigment in the skin.
NZgeisha 8 months ago
@NZgeisha
we weren't dropped off, we simply migrated as we searched for better living conditions. I'd just like to make that clear
and we actually started as a light skin color, not bronze :)
WitchHunter93 8 months ago
@WitchHunter93 that was just my opinion, and how do you know we weren't dropped?
NZgeisha 8 months ago
@NZgeisha
because we have evidence of species migrating and changing according to their environments
we have no evidence of being dropped, which wouldn't make any sense anyway since that implies that we lived in the clouds and fell off
WitchHunter93 8 months ago
@WitchHunter93 how can you be so narrow minded when you see how many stars there are in the universe
we are weak feeble defenceless creatures i am certain that we are pre adapted for earth otherwise we would be just food to the other creatures but fortunately we have a pre adapted brain, but on the other hand earth has been destroyed many times through out history, in the last 200 years we have advanced in tech, what happened to the last 20,000 years? where is our history?
NZgeisha 8 months ago
@NZgeisha
we've evolved in a way where we don't depend on physical strength or agility. i can assure you that our ancestors were much stronger than we are today, however they were much dumber. even so, if they were smart enough to sharpen a long stick and work together to kill a big animal they would survive.
like many other species, we migrated, those who were smarter survived. the ones who weren't smart enough would die off
we're not pre-adapted to anything, our characteristics evolve
WitchHunter93 8 months ago
@NZgeisha
and if i remember correctly, the lowest the human population has ever been is about 18,000 by the end of the ice age. we've managed to survive many huge disasters such as supervolcanoes
nothing points to us getting dropped with a pre-existing intelligence, assuming that we were with no evidence is nothing more than a blind guess
WitchHunter93 8 months ago
@WitchHunter93 my god you are so narrow minded, so what happened to the last 50,000 years? look up niburu and planet x they seem to be the ones that have altered the humans
NZgeisha 7 months ago
@NZgeisha
I love myths
astronomers agree that niburu or planet X is nothing more than a myth & not real
quit being so gullible
WitchHunter93 7 months ago
Hahahlook at thjis video some kid made on how to survive the rapture /watch?v=Ww9N0Ac7Khs&feature=feedlik
epikblue 8 months ago
That caller was the biggest dumbass this side of the Mississippi
TheNogre 8 months ago
Why the hell didn't he just tell the guy that we share common ancestry with apes?? If he just ignores the improper question it'll cause continued confusion and eventually just what we saw. The entire call was a waste, even though I wasn't expecting much.
AE was wrong this time.
I miss Matt & Tracie. They are the best at debating, and at explaining the issues at hand.
Cootabux 8 months ago
@Cootabux i dont like these to hosts.. but like the show. matt is the best but i think these 2 are really weak and sometimes dodge the questions n it looks really weak.
chinamanspeakenlis 8 months ago
The caller IS a monkey.
A drunk one.
mikkodude 8 months ago 2
Derka Derppppp!!
SquareRo0o0t 8 months ago
To theists: try debunking Einstein's theory of general relativity! lol!
FallofDarkness55 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURN IN HELL FOREVER OR BELIEVE IN JESUS
fuckmania07 8 months ago
DO YOU THINK A CAT CAME FROM A DAOOOOWG.
volound 8 months ago
But I'm pretty sure that was a prank call, someone just making fun of stupid christians. He sounded just a bit TOO retarded.
winterstellar 8 months ago
Haha, "believe in evolution"?? Evolution is a fact, not "believing in it" is like "not believing in" gravity for instance. Where did that hick go to school? Maybe he was homeschooled by other ignorants?: )
winterstellar 8 months ago
@winterstellar It's not a fact, it's the best explanation yet according to the scientific community. Facts don't exist because we can only interpret what we measure or sense.
baskoffie 8 months ago
@baskoffie
It's a fact that we share common ancestry, the theory is the method for which it takes place.
CrazyBluePrime 8 months ago
@CrazyBluePrime Don't get me wrong, i believe that evolution is a fact, I just meant that we can only prove our observation of reality.
baskoffie 8 months ago
Christian belief is not christian belife, it's only one by one, yes, one by one human pushed to death, without our conciousness, there is an answer to this, this is too little sick, to know, true is not what our minds are thinking, more and more you can get of this, but we are humans, we oppose to others at the beginning, then chaos is done, think what you believe? no, think what you feel you are, without any influences because you are one within. Is religion really means something for you?
Rovization 8 months ago
Another idiot theist does not understand evolution. You shouldn't attempt to debunk what you don't understand.
parkert51 8 months ago
sounds like one of the characters from king of the hill
chidorikakashi 8 months ago
Simple shit: Evolution is a tree of life, not a ladder of inheritance; you can only get a ladder if you chop down a tree & make it yourself, that is what Creationists need to learn
Tarynus 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURN IN HELL FOREVER OR BELIEVE IN JESUS
fuckmania07 8 months ago
@thepowerofloandhate
Yes, everyone knows this. Sadly the fundie can't get their heads out of their asses and accept modern science. Being humble is supposed to be a christian value and yet they hardly act humble at all. Perhaps the most humbling aspect of science is that we learned we evolved from an ape-like ancestor.
NUTCASE71733 9 months ago
The guy on the right isn't as clever as he thinks, quite annoying. hilarious caller.
CssAfc 9 months ago
Yiiooooo... Hick... Yi, Yiooo claaaiiim we caiime from m... monkeee's?
DtTV94 9 months ago
This guy is fukin awesome ..they should have let him ramble:P
screat 9 months ago
man came from monkey....how the hell!!! the earth cooled from a hot lava type thing and produced vapor, then water then came bacteria and then amphibians and then reptiles then mammals...this crap doesnt add up....
jonathanscar 9 months ago
@jonathanscar The Earth cooled, over a very, Very long period of time. Amino acids either arrived on earth by extra-terrestrial means or developed from chemicals on earth at the time. Amino acid, when electricity is applied in the right conditions, can possibly make the simplest possible form of life. Then over an unfathomably long period of time, this lifeform grew into bacteria, becoming more and more complex. Bacteria to tiny sea creatures, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and boom! Human!
DtTV94 9 months ago
@jonathanscar
It makes perfect sense because over the course of many, many generation animals (and non-animals) will change bodily structures and become something else. This has been proven over and over. Your mind must not be able to grasp the concept.
How do you think dogs exist? Humans created dogs from wolves through a process called natural selection, which is an application of evolution.
steviej321 9 months ago
lmfao that was hilarious, I would have hung up a long time ago.
FearedBliss 9 months ago
Humans didn't evolve from monkeys. Modern humans and modern monkeys had a common ancestor. Monkeys are just as evolved as humans. Thats why humans didn't evolve from monkeys... It really isn't that hard. :/
TheYou0Tuber 9 months ago
I think he had too much moonshine
Exlemic 9 months ago
ugh .. really !? listen , man and ape evolved from common ancestors .
soo its correct when answered , NO man did not evolved from apes !
antonkhuu 9 months ago
@antonkhuu Technically, modern humans ARE apes. So it would be correct to say we evolved from a common ancestor who was also an ape. We also had an ancestor that was a fish if you look back far enough.
Olikiscrazy 9 months ago
I think the caller is drunk....
wonderbugz89 9 months ago
" LHEMMI HASK YOUH A KWEST JUN, LHEMMI HASK YOUH A KWEEEEEST YUN "
Tait011 9 months ago
Bart: Evolution? That ain't no sense, dagnabbit.
Homer: Bart, what did I tell you?
Bart: No talking like a grizzled 1890's prospector, consarn it.
WillShakespeare2007 9 months ago
hahahahaha, that guy was hilarious!!
EpicSauce101 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't think that was a waste of time, I found it highly entertaining
SSBB12347 9 months ago
This guy sounds like he started his weekend early... Don't they screen out drunk callers on the Atheist Experience?
bencamp18 9 months ago
@2Pains1Love I think in his case, the caller may have actually come from his brother or sister. I think a chromosome was lost (or gained) in the genetic exchange between his parents.
bencamp18 9 months ago
I could barely understand the caller lol I....I just can't take these people seriously sometimes....either way they handled it nicely. Good for a belly laugh I suppose.
diesweetprince 9 months ago
"You mean we came from monkeys?" is like saying "You mean I came from my brother/sister?"
You and your brother/sister have same parents, neither of you came from your siblings. Get your fact right, creationists.
2Pains1Love 9 months ago 11
@2Pains1Love lol i love how evolutionist think their so right and they make fun of creationist saying our belife is unscientific yet you believe that the world exploded out of nothing and by chance it created complex and well structured universe? XD so you might as well say that computers evolved out of old scrap metal
juicyjfan 6 months ago
@juicyjfan
The BB was not an explosion nor does anyone say it came from nothing and comparing evolution to computers is fallacious. We have something you will never have, evidence.
thirdLeg 6 months ago
@thirdLeg show me this so called evidence please i wanna see it
juicyjfan 6 months ago
@juicyjfan
Fossils, DNA, Chromone2,...it's been WITNESSED.
thirdLeg 6 months ago
@thirdLeg that dosent prove anything that could have been mutations give me some solid groundbreaking proof
juicyjfan 6 months ago
@juicyjfan
What? The fact that it has been witnessed isn't proof for you? Read about chromosone2 and get back to me.
thirdLeg 6 months ago
@juicyjfan That is solid groundbreaking proof.lol
SuperMrAtheist 6 months ago
@2Pains1Love Actually I'd put money on it that that guy did come from his brother or sister! =D
MrLittletomdj 6 months ago
I swear that dude on the right borrowed that shirt off matt
protorobsmos 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thepowerofloandhate "I do not hate no one" So... You hate everyone?
crowe203068 9 months ago
How is he able to operate a phone?
Jelubaful 9 months ago 3
The only reason why this atheist people keep clicking the button is because they couldn't keep up with the questions they were being asked