Added: 5 years ago
From: rotarican
Views: 238,215
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (264)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Chacho QuE" PorquriA.......... 9.segundos el gadungo de mi abuelA ase 9. Segundos bro! Jajajajaja QuE Charro.......

  • 9.5 en el 1/8 milla , que Vaca ..

  • SUPER STARLET

  • Great Scott! it almost hit 88 mph

  • sounds like my chain saw

    

  • Rotor power! lovely

  • if its a rotor it aint a motor. sounds shit and looks like a square taxi

  • Nice!!!!! A 9 second car. That's what said in Spanish. Coño!!!!!

  • It sounds like it uses metal fragments for fuel.

  • @illustriouschin Rotary's are the Chuck Norris of engines. Instead of fuel, they just eat metal scrapes instead

  • Nueve cinco! Diablo un startlet hace tiempo que no veo uno!

  • so therefore without torque there is no power ;), need tp pull a heavy load up a hill.............i know which i prefer.

  • its not all motor if ur on juice. nos=forced induction

  • puerto rico have some nice rotaries..... But the best are found all the way down under in Australia.... Weve got an N/A 12A running 8's, 13b T running 7's, and a 20b running 7's too ;)

  • @dreadly101 australia has noithing except for the fastest wich is 6.75 we own the 13b or 12a scene we have a 13b in the 6s and b20 aswell

  • @rotarycorvette1 Australia has the worlds fastest rotaries!! So how do ya think you've got it better than us then you fucking spaz?!! We own all records for the 12a, 13b, 20b, 26b dickhead!

  • @dreadly101 shut the fuck up and get your facts straight!

  • @rotarycorvette1 My facts are straight! Get back to Tacco Bell already! Aussie's own puerto rico, heck we could buy you with half our mineral export tax lmao. Nice engine- shit car your running it in......... Shows your quality straight away lol

  • @dreadly101 hey dumbass puerto rico is usa so no u cant afford it. taco bell is for mexicans wich we are not! and fuck ausi like ur self watch my vids and get ur facts straight!!

  • @rotarycorvette1 Dominican republic.... Lol that'd you'd even consider yourself American is just sad- what because your counrty was so poor you sold yourself to a wealthy nation. I would be ashamed by that not happy. You all speak spanish anyways? peace out mate. Take care Rotaries are great at least we can agree on that. And sorry for being a typical Aussie smart asS. lol But hey can ya blame us we live in Paradise, plenty of beaches, beer, weed, tough cars and chicks ;)

  • @dreadly101 rotarys rule but iam rican not dominican..lol lets clear that upo ita a big diference!

  • @dreadly101 you have shitty weed in australia ;]

  • @spiffyhunkofeces Are you crazy? We have Awesome weed in Australia!!! 5 star buds

  • @spiffyhunkofeces you've obviously never heard of hydroponics, good weed can be grown anywhere you dumb fuck. You just need the right strain / seed.

  • @dreadly101 All the rich americans are already starting to immigrate to australia. wait til the taxes get raised in usa more.

  • ITS BRUCE LEE

  • Así es que se le da a un mazda si miedo

  • ese piloto le da pa que se rompa!!!!!

  • mi hermano ese piloto le da como carro robao!!!!! no quiere la guagua!!!! eso es pa darle pero no asi!!!

  • sounds like a violent wee bastard :)

  • Comment removed

  • if it aint a rotor it aint a motor. sounds crisp looks great

  • If anyone needs a new lesson in physics on work, tq,hp, and what they mean, will be glad to explain it for any of you. Both baldy and bart are beating around the bush, it is not hard. you can have tq and not do any work. ex. hold a weight out with your hand at eye level, you are exerting tq but doing no work until you move it. you can measure the tq applied by distance from your shoulder to the weight. it will be in lb-ft. :)

  • regardless rotaries sound like a woman, all tinny and rattly, give me an 8 shotter anyday. Real mans engine.

  • tss... Audi turbo 5cyl<3

  • 4 rotary engine is tha best shit there is, look for 4rotaryengine on youtube, that bmw frame whit the mazda engine is master

  • How the fuck is it all motor,and nitrous injected at the same time?

  • ROTARY POWER BABY!!!!!

  • puerto ricans go hard when it comes to racing... not like mexican ricers...

  • if rotaries are such power makers why do they always go in a tiny car? u wanna impress me with a rotary then put it in a full size car and run a respectable number.

  • because a smaller car is less weight then a bigger car, so it's smarter, and it's power to weight ratio, plus they are power makers, for such a small engine to make that sort of power is incredible

  • oh i realise that but thats what im getting at. all the rotary fans think they are the bomb but when you make them do some heavy work they fall over. you can put a big V8 in them litte cars and they fly. the demaj brothers proved that. all im saying is if a rotary is really going to impress me it has to do the numbers on a level playing field.

  • you cant even compare a 5 litre v8 to a 1.3 litre rotor. a 5 litre rotor could make a tank run a good pass

  • yeah but if a rotary has 3 "power cycles" or whatever you want to call them per roatation its basically equivelant to triple the size.

  • but it doesnt change the fact its actual displacement is only 1.3, its jst designed in a different manner to maximise power to displacement ratio. even if you did tke these so called power cycles into account thn a better comparison would b a 6 litre v8 vs a 20b. im putting my muny on the 20b

  • doesnt change the displacement but its like putting a 2 stroke 250 bike against a 4 stroke. same cubes but due to the design you have an engine that makes more power due to the increased power strokes. and as for the 6lt v the 20b if u put them in the same vehicle with similar (approx) tuning then i think it would be a close thing. dont get me wrong, even tho im not a fan i do think they are fast but when you level the playing field ie. same weight vehicle the rotary is going to find it harder.

  • its like 13b is a 4cylinder a 20b is a v6 and 4 rotor is a v8..lol

  • oh for sure, thats one of the old race "rules" less weight =faster car. rotaries are quick but when you put them into an equivelant size vehicle to what most V8s are running in they dont look so impressive. they are fast in a light car but any engine can be quick in a light frame.

  • yea thts fair enuf seeing as a rotor relies on its high power to weight. would be a good race 2 see

  • you nailed it man. while rotaries do make good power they rely on a lightweight frame to make good numbers while a V8 has a torque advantage so it can turn in good numbers in a full size car.

  • they have rotaries making 900hp. doesnt matter if a v8 or a rotary makes 900hp its still the same.

  • no its not the same at all. ok the 900hp bit is the same but its torque that moves the weight and gets you down a track not hp.

  • torque is nothing but rotational force or how much it can move. hp is how fast something moves in a straight line. a rotary has an advantage cause it is light to begin with. an ls1 is the closest weight to a rotary 13b so is that not fair cause they put it in small cars? torque and hp are related through rpm lower torque engines need higher rpm to produce the same hp as high torque engine. rotaries are good at what they do.

  • you have no idea what you are talking about. torque (rotational force) is what does all the work. hp is a measure of work done in a given period of time.

  • wow good job an engine that rotates, torques does all the work cause its a rotation force. way to be smart there. take a physic course and learn something then go to the track and learn some more. your comment proved nothing nor did it disprove my comment.

  • ok i'll try to keep this simple. torque (a measure of rotational force) is what moves a vehicle. the torque travels through the gearbox where it is multiplied then to the diff where it is multiplied again and transferred through the axles to the wheels where it is transformed into linear force to move said vehicle. a horsepower number is the end figure of an equation designed to find out how much work a given engine can do.

  • why are you telling me all this when i already said the same thing in my first comment. you attempt to make your self seem smart is failing because you cant read. your rambling still doesnt disprove anything. hp is in short how fast something can move. low torque engines need high rpm to make up for the low torque to get the same hp. im not sure what your arguing.

  • im sick of arguing about this. horsepower is a measure of work done, the only thing it has to do with speed is the time it takes to do work. you get a 600hp truck 2050ft/lb of torque and it would get monstered by a 350hp car on the track but when it comes to doing work the truck shits all over it. and in case you havnt guessed when i say "work" im using it in the measurement term. and all this shit has nothing to do with what i first said in my initial comment.

  • please read your comment and then slap your self. a race it determined by hp to weight. not torque to weight. your running off on random things im still talking hp to weight which is what your first comment was about. so please reread my comments and understand what im talking about before you say anything else.

  • YOU DO NOT GET IT. horsepower is an arrived at figure determined by what an engine can do. a car doesnt "have" horsepower. after it has done a given amount of "work" the horsepower can be calculated. as for the power to weight this is exactly what i was talking about. if rotaries are so powerful why are they always put into small cars. its a rhetorical question by the way.

  • your and idiot. rotaries are light thats the point of them. if you have 4hp per lb then it doesnt matter when the car weighs or hoe much hp your making. racing is about hp to weight. 900hp in a 3000lbs car is the same no matter what engine it is. you clearly have never driven or worked on cars before. your theory fails too because i train makes over 5000ft/lbs and like 200hp and they are slow as balls. thats proof that your wrong.

  • im not arguing with an idiot any more. when u understand more than grade 3 principals of shit then you can comment.

  • poor baby got proven wrong and is all but hurt now. it really doesnt matter what you say cause drag racing is about hp to weight no matter how you look at it. torque plays a factor with making the hp. high torque engines need lower rpms to create more hp were low torque engines need higher rpms to create the same hp. i understand more then 3 principals but im not like you and ignore certain principals to make me right.

  • no im just sick of arguing with a moron who cant understand what im trying to tell him.

  • i understand what your saying which is different then what your first post was. your talking about work as in physics and what an engine can do or the amount of force it produces. now lets get back to the fact that your first post was about putting a rotary in a full size car like they do with the v8s. you lost the arguement and changed the subject and now you still lose good job. now whos the moron. congrats for being in high school.

  • you.

  • i love how like 6 people have proved you wrong and you still call every one else a moron and dont believe them. go race a car some time and then we can talk.

  • Power=Torque x Rotational speed

    Power= how much energy you put in a period of time

    Torque by itself is pointless,

    Take car 1: 500hp at 5000 rpm

    Take car 2: 500hp at 7500 rpm

    both cars hve the same mass and same gear box, car 1 has a 3:1 final drive, car 2 has 4,5:1 final drive

    Both cars will make the quarter mile at the same time.

  • to simplify

    tq= force

    work= force x distance

    hp = work done/ time

    an engine that can rev higher requires less tq as it does more work.

    example

    92 camaro vs my 8

    camaro v8 had about 225hp and 275 or so tq

    8 has 230hp and 160 tq and lower gearing to help*

    result, the 8 will outrun it due to holding power (doing more work) longer than the v8. (yes you have other factors like weight, Cd, friction, etc.) point is area under the curve higher revs = more area to play with :)

  • I was oversimplifying of course the important thing is to have a wide powerband, unless you are willing to change gears a lot but cliffkemp appears to be someone you cant put real physics inside its head

  • I knew what you meant but many dont. they think they do but dont. I just gave an example is all. Why the rude comment? physics and mechanics are not that hard unless you make it so.

  • I got steamed easily when some brags about the "stone crushing" torque they have. and I got confused of username sorry.

    I do also like nimble firebreathing engines, specially if they are strange, like a wankel.

    I myself I'm starting to move contacts to build a new breed of rotary engine that is not wankel

  • you know as well as I do, people throw around tq and hp as if there is no difference in the 2 but there is. I do agree with you.

    Good luck with the engine, update me if you get something new running as I am interested in all kinds of engines. the smaller yet more powerful the better.

  • I will but the objective in this one is not insane power/displacement, is maximum thermodinamic efficiency, aka pull the best mileage as possible mantaining the power otput

  • when you achieve that, I am sure you will try to push it to do the second. :) getting the most power with the least fuel use is similar to more hp/(insert whatever here) :) I do know what you are saying. I believe that cold fusion is the answer but, how to start it is still a huge mystery. if cold fusion is perfected, putting it on a small enough scale for portable use would be the next step.

  • @smvuy

    but on daily street driving, the one with the 500 hp at 5000 rpm will make alot more power at lower rpms, where most engines run daily

  • actually, it doesnt matter with the situation he gave below. both cars are essentially the same. That was the whole point of his comparo. both cars are the same. as far as street drivinig goes, still the same. smvuy knows what he is talking about and is why he put the example out there. What you just said was not correct.

  • @smvuy power is just a mathematical equation after torque measurements are taken, u dont measure hp on a dyno u measure torque and the computer does the math, in theory ur right about car 1 and 2 but engine and gearbox characteristics would make big differences, i aint baging the rotar or the piston just saying

  • @smvuy Torque is not pointless!!! in the 1st place drag racers look for torque to create a good launch!!!

  • @smvuy Torque is vital, is it just me or does anyone else think this person is full of it.

  • both of you are wrong about tq. tq is just force. It is not in motion. tq is just force. When motion occurs, it is then work or force x distance. When that work is done for x amt of time, you have hp. Common now get it right. I am sure you both know this but get it right.

  • you are correct but when applied to cars like i was applying it i was correct i never got that detailed with it. i was talking about hp and tq relation and that a drag race is hp to weight not tq to weight cause tq has no measure of distance like you stated. im well aware of the basic principals of physics. your just more involved then what my point was. thanks though.

  • just seemed like you both were beating around the bush so to speak. I have talked with you before and know you know a good bit. I was just making sure everyone was on the same page. :)

  • i know a lot of basic stuff more or less the foundation of cars and building them the more technical stuff i fall flat on my face with. i was trying not to get into all that stuff. thanks for the good explanation. you put it a lot better then i could have.

  • anytime.

  • KP61!!!!!!!

  • what are these people talking about two stroke...4 cycles???its a rotary engine look up how it works if anything its a 1 or 3 stroke its takes gas in compresses it fires and lets exhaust out in one turn...

  • I think they are talking about the engine having the same principles as a 2 stroke engine.

  • look at it like this. a 4 stroke is 1 power for ever 4 revolutions or 1/4 so a 2 stroke is 1/2 following the same math a rotary is 3/1.. by simple math a rotary is 12 times as powerful in the same size.... then add in the motion of a regular piston... everytime it changes direction it loses energy witch is y a piston engine needs a flywheel as a buffer to keep enough energy to keep things moving till the next power stroke

  • lol mexicans can do anything!

  • there puerto rican completly different...

  • Beaner

  • No mexicans here buddy..

  • its a jap car

  • nitrous is forced induction you retart this isnt an all motor car.

  • *retard*

  • ROTARY is not a two stroke it have 4 Cycles ;)

  • that's fuckin righteous!

  • rocket

  • KP61 starlet + 13B power on!!

  • Sounds like a two stroke ; )

  • quick ass mf.

  • that thing sounds like the devil built it, I LOVE IT!

  • Call it what you want,run those ets.......

  • how long he do the 1/4 ?and how fast

  • 9.5

  • dont fuck with the angry rotary

  • rotary pawer es lo q hay jajajajajaja

  • I seriously started to quiver...wow, things you can do with a 2 rotor engine...limitless.

  • not really I would love to se you inject 350hp of nitrous to a 4banger

  • 350 hp of nos no, but yeah 4 bangers can be just as fast as that, if we are not talking about a stock vehicle you can do limitless mods to any type of car and get any type of engine fucking fast, all depends on budget

  • like a 1000 hp eclipse.

  • But when you can get 1,600 to 1,800 hp from a 3 rotor, who would want to go to a four banger?

  • Thats one pissed wasp alright.

  • imagine rockkin up to that little thing at the lights and he revs it

  • wow how much revs are this

  • Comment removed

  • DAMN that was nice... sounded like a VERY angry 2 stroke motor lol...

  • Yea it really sounds like angry 2 stroke. my snowmobile sounds same :DD

  • OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!

    that car is cccccccrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaazzz­yyyyy

  • i bet if i drive with that everybody would look :p man what a beast :p

  • how do they make a clutch to handle that car lol

  • hahha sweet

  • dont u just love that rotory sound

  • like a rubber band

  • are you a member of the rotary international

  • mi gusta diesele

  • no shit assclown...

  • impressive...for a Mr. Bean car ...lol

  • omg noob that's not a mr.bean car...

  • DAM

  • Rotary FTW!!! That is badass, I love extreme n/a rotaries.

  • uhhhh.... what?

  • rotarys are the bomb unstoppble power better than a V8

  • holy shit!!! 9.5s?

  • oh, the flames are unburnt fuel, nothing to cause damage, thats why he still makes his run....otherwise theyde have to drag it back to the pit and access the damage...

  • plus think of motocross, why do you think that they have 125 in a 250 class? its 4 stroke against 2...this engine does not have valves only ports, much like a two stroke, but this is a rotary....

  • think of it this way, a top fuel has roughly 8000 hp for 878ci...thats 14,393cc...and this engine "1300cc" is making 1000 hp, if not, ive seen it... and seen 1400hp from this motor...its almost double that, and the top fuel costs roughly 500,000 to make, "roughly" this prolly cost them a lil over 15 grand....and was prolly done by shadetree mechanics....now if you can make a top fuel that produces 8000!!! hp tell me....

  • HOLY!

    That car took off like a bat out of hell...GOOD GOD

  • Wow WHAT A TAKE OFF HOLY FUCK!

  • THIS TRACK IS IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

  • Puertorico

  • 0:00/0:05. That car sounds fucking pissed off! Quick little barstard as well. Cool flames. Great little car.

  • buen tiempo papi pero ese no se le para a mi rx-7 bahando 8.5 en la cuarta milla.

  • donde es esto en que pista !!!!!!

  • Eso es en el Autodromo de las Americas !!!! Republica Dominicana!

  • gracias , mano me voy a tirar un viajesito pa ya!

  • 9.05 ese es una mierda chico

  • cuanto hace el tuyo ?

  • Diablo papi! Que tiempo hace tu astro van?

  • thats power rotary...form Puerto Rico

  • It's noy form puerto rico

  • git er done with a wankel

  • BETTER THAN USED PANTIES

  • number 1...that starlet is a beast

  • That is the most pissed off car I have ever heard. I want one. Fire is cool!

  • I was thinkin the same thing, it's pissed and look out!

  • nove cinco...kkkkkk

  • 9.5

  • thats quick !

  • music to my ears

  • +1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Damn that was fucking awesome.

    Those flames underneath are a good alternative to neon, lol.

  • fk loud

  • F U C K ........!

  • phat bro it gta b rotory

  • i know y its so fkn loud:P its bciooz dey took d muflers of:P:P

  • Sounds like a very loud fan.

  • mathematically speaking the piston engine owns the rotary in terms of hp/cc. a top fuel engine makes 1hp/cc roughly. if you made a 1300cc top fuel engine it would make 1300hp. find me a 13b with that much... i defy you.

  • Well i cant find one but consider this with a piston engine you have reciprocating mass you constantly changing direction of the piston so you lose power not to mention that a piston engine fires its spark plugs before top dead center so the fuel is ignited before the piston reaches its maximum compression

  • i agree with lizznack. the numbers dont lie. you cant argue simple mathematics. nobody can. now... in all reality, nobody can afford a top fuel engine, so rotary wins in terms of cost effectiveness. ultimate horsepower = ultimate cost.

  • Yeah, but rotarys use more gas which can get pretty expansive expecially if your buying racing fuel.