is more connection means smarter, no...means different way of processing information, which proves that men process at a different lelel. But ig uess science and mathematics have something to say about that, who is more apt in those fields
men are smarter, but women r emotionally intelligent. if women were smarter u'd find the majority of patent by female authors but that's not the care, more than 93% r by men. if women were smarter u find equations written in their names i dont see similar to Navier stokes equation written by a female
Actually, in a recent study by a psychologist it appears men's brains are a bit bigger. However the intelligence levels of both are equal. The whole "Men are stronger, but women are smarter" mantra is false. It's simply made up to make women feel better. Don't get me wrong, we're on equal terms, although men are a bit stronger.
Men are on average 5 IQ points smarter than women. You can do all your "womens brains are more connected" bullshit, but in the end men are still smarter.
@YouveJustBenTrolled To be perfectly honest with you, I don't believe in the 'women are smarter' bullshit just as much as I don't believe in the 'men are smarter' bullshit. Connections within the brain are created through learning. If someone doesn't make the effort to learn, they have fewer connections. I know dumb women and dumb men, so I can tell you that an entire gender isn't smarter than the other. Intelligence lies with the individual, not the gender.
all i hear is "blah blah blah, i'm jealous, blah blah blah. My lack of neurological connections along with my fiery insecurities is causing me to spew out false statements such as "she still far from comprehending logic and reason" which is both grammatically incorrect and unsupported.
@belizeangal4ever Yeah, your comment proves how distorted your perception of reality is. How you were able to perceive an implication that I was jealous from my comment is so ridiculous.
And if you're still curious, I'm too confident in myself to have any insecurities which would eventually harbor jealousy to those who excel in the areas that a person would lack confidence in.
And lastly, if women did comprehend logic, then it would be you who would be leaders in science and engineering.
@ApollosInsight It is NOt that far-fetched to sense some sort in your comment. For one, if you were as confident as you say you are, you wouldn't feel the need after watching a video that compliments women, to point out watch you perceive is a flaw that women have. That is by NO means a distortion of reality my friend. Your comment DID come off defensive. So after centuries of oppression and deprivation of proper education we're supposed to delve into science and engineering?
@belizeangal4ever and if you knew anything about anything you would know that the field of engineering is sky-rocketting and thus the demographics of the people working in that field would NOT be a reliable source on whether we have the ability to 'comprehend logic'. Less than a few decades after the paramount of our opression we have come far. We even outnumber you priviledged fools in higher education.
@belizeangal4ever Yeah, you western women are always complaining about some "oppression". Guess what? So was my people here in America. In fact, back then if any of us were given any education, we'd be put to death. Despite that, many philosophers, pioneers, and businessfolks still emerged despite us being racially opppressed.
So that "oppressive" mantra has to go. And another thing: If you western women were so smart, why are you eliminating capitalism, which is the basis of an ecomomy?
@ApollosInsight For you information, that you clearly lack, I never play the "oppression" card unless some sexist tries to bring up the past or how we're not 'leaders' in the "most respected' fields in the present. Ifyou know anything about science you'd be familiar with the scientific method. When experimenting and comparing to different groups it has to in a controlled environment. In other words they have to have the SAME surrounding. Even with individuals you can't compare their
@belizeangal4ever accomplishments because they went through different things.So how the hell would you be able to compare whole groups of people that have OBVIOUSLY had different experiences or mind-sets. willie lynch mastered in breaking down the mentality of slaves. Today in the modern world, influences from the past to reemerge. If we were never expected to even work or get a damn education how would us as a whole be leaders in these fields. It takes time to change this way of thinking.
@belizeangal4ever The mere fact that there are women in these fields PROVE that we are able to do it. Men aren't NEARLY as pressured in the media. magazines, television, advertisements, and men themselves pressure us heavily to be beautiful. Have you ever ridiculed a female because of her appearance? In the past few decades there is no one more opressed than the black woman. So i think i know a thing or two about opression. I scored in the top 1 percentile in science last year.
@belizeangal4ever Ok, look at your third comment. It says: "So after centuries of oppression and deprivation of proper education we're supposed to delve into science and engineering?" That seems to me that you are playing the oppression card.
And if you really think that women are more dominant in the workforce, then y are there accusations of "gender wage gap"? That would mean that there are women getting paid more than other women, yet it's still an issue.
@ApollosInsight And about this "gender intellect", why is it throughout history that inventions have been patented by men much more than women, and the progress of sciences have been attributed in men? And in fact, y has the US Gross Domestic Product has been lower in an inverse relation to women in the workforce?
@ApollosInsight See THIS is when i bring up oppression. if you say throughout history and we can BOTH agree that throughout history women weren't given the same advantages why the hell would you bring it up....no reason skills. That's like me whipping you every time you reach for a pie in a food contest and then go on and on about how you reached for less pie than others because you have less intellect. IT MAKES NO SENSE.......
@ApollosInsight No one said that women are more dominant in the workforce. If i did then i would be lying.I'm saying that you cant base their intellect on the fact that they aren't, it's stupid. that's like saying that because 63% of homeless people are men that women are smarter. I've heard little girlz say that they want to be housewives when they grow older. Now where do you think they got that from?
@belizeangal4ever If little girls say that they want to be housewives, then that's what they say. Just b/c someone says they want to be something doesn't mean that they're going to pursue that. I said that I wanted to be a deacon of a church, but I'm not. And if you really believe that social conditioning is absolute in determining one's intellectual capacity, you're sorely mistaken. If you reseach history for any slave/oppressed people, you'll see that they STILL retained ideas and info.
no, but social conditioning DOES determine what someone wants to pursue in life career-wise which for some weird reason you believe has a lot to do with intelligence. Give me ONE opressed people that have overtly ran a field that they were once prevented from participating in.
@belizeangal4ever If Black History isn't a great example of how many people contributed to great advances despite being hated and oppressed , then Idk how else to convince you.
It would take me at least 54,000 characters to give you many historic examples of how many enslaved/oppressed people were still be able to contribute to human greatness, but I'll leave that up to you to do the research.
@ApollosInsight so you're saying that women didn't contribute to human 'greatness'? maybe YOU are the one that needs to do the research. I am well aware of the accomplishments of MY black people. Yet we are not overtly running anything. People still criticize my people just like you are criticizing my gender. By forgetting the good and not accounting in factors that lead to the bad.
@belizeangal4ever No, not as much as men did. In fact, during the civil right era, WE black men were killed much more than you black women were.
And another thing, the reason why OUR people aren't running anything is b/c we got this "crab in the bucket" mentality in that those of us who aspire to be productive and organized are ostracized and shunned by the majority b/c it's seen as being a "self-hating sellout"
And w/ criticism: There's always going to be that, regardless who it's by.
@ApollosInsight exactly. although during that era men got hit harder, women were hit more long lasting. Men were let into higher education first, and were let in the work force first. Well someone can also say that WHITE men contributed more than BLACK men did. different circumstances. Yes MEN "contributed" more than WOMEN in technology and what not. different circumstances. I do not nkow how you cannot see the parallels .
@belizeangal4ever Let me remind you again about the social status of the civil-rights era:
1. White man
2.white woman
3.non-whites,non-blacks
4.Black woman
5.Black man.
We as black men were the last to be hired, first to be fired. We as BM have come along way to actually gaining a place in society until the emergence of the femininst era which put us back in square one, separating us from our families.
Yet, we still have contributed to many examples of success in this country.
i beg to differ, if even in the white society women were considered of less value why does it change with the blacks?
1. White man
2.white woman
3.non-whites,non-blacks
4.Black man
5.Black woman.
yes, you were the last to be hired, first to be fired. Black women were never to hired and thus never to be fired unless we were to give the white man pleasure.
@belizeangal4ever Sure, you can't JUDGE people based on sex because of the vast amount of variation, but that there isn't a difference between male/female intelligence is just nonsense, and is completely unsupported scientifically. Science has shown that, on a bell curve, women and men have very similar mean intelligence, but men have a significantly lower peak and higher std dev, meaning there are more men than women who are geniuses/idiots. And the results show extremely low alpha value
Everything in the world is invented and mastered by men, men are even the better chefs, nuf said.
mairella 2 months ago
@mairella YEaah, but MEN came out of a women so... i dont really know what your trying to say lol
paradee12 1 month ago
@paradee1And women were made from men's sperm, whats your point?
mairella 1 month ago
he's of course absolute right in his allegations!
60sisthashit 3 months ago
Comment removed
carlinsaves 4 months ago
is more connection means smarter, no...means different way of processing information, which proves that men process at a different lelel. But ig uess science and mathematics have something to say about that, who is more apt in those fields
warrior4just 4 months ago
men are smarter, but women r emotionally intelligent. if women were smarter u'd find the majority of patent by female authors but that's not the care, more than 93% r by men. if women were smarter u find equations written in their names i dont see similar to Navier stokes equation written by a female
warrior4just 4 months ago
Actually, in a recent study by a psychologist it appears men's brains are a bit bigger. However the intelligence levels of both are equal. The whole "Men are stronger, but women are smarter" mantra is false. It's simply made up to make women feel better. Don't get me wrong, we're on equal terms, although men are a bit stronger.
biohazardcloud 5 months ago
@biohazardcloud a bit stronger? I think it's safe to say that men are generally much more stronger than women.
MrAlstair123 4 weeks ago
Men score highest (and lowest) on IQ tests due to their greater spatial aptitude= willingness to take chances
nneevveerrmmoorree 6 months ago
Men are on average 5 IQ points smarter than women. You can do all your "womens brains are more connected" bullshit, but in the end men are still smarter.
YouveJustBenTrolled 6 months ago
@YouveJustBenTrolled To be perfectly honest with you, I don't believe in the 'women are smarter' bullshit just as much as I don't believe in the 'men are smarter' bullshit. Connections within the brain are created through learning. If someone doesn't make the effort to learn, they have fewer connections. I know dumb women and dumb men, so I can tell you that an entire gender isn't smarter than the other. Intelligence lies with the individual, not the gender.
Kittywhiskers1000 5 months ago
@belizeangal4ever sooo true about how some people just can't see the parallel's between women and blacks being kept down. they're idiots.
TheBeatlesFan420 7 months ago
Men on average have higher IQs.
romanpr1nce 7 months ago
This is a myth of neuroscience.
metalmike83 7 months ago
All those neurological connections in a woman's brain, but yet she still far from comprehending logic and reason.
Sad.
ApollosInsight 2 years ago
@ApollosInsight
all i hear is "blah blah blah, i'm jealous, blah blah blah. My lack of neurological connections along with my fiery insecurities is causing me to spew out false statements such as "she still far from comprehending logic and reason" which is both grammatically incorrect and unsupported.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever Yeah, your comment proves how distorted your perception of reality is. How you were able to perceive an implication that I was jealous from my comment is so ridiculous.
And if you're still curious, I'm too confident in myself to have any insecurities which would eventually harbor jealousy to those who excel in the areas that a person would lack confidence in.
And lastly, if women did comprehend logic, then it would be you who would be leaders in science and engineering.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight It is NOt that far-fetched to sense some sort in your comment. For one, if you were as confident as you say you are, you wouldn't feel the need after watching a video that compliments women, to point out watch you perceive is a flaw that women have. That is by NO means a distortion of reality my friend. Your comment DID come off defensive. So after centuries of oppression and deprivation of proper education we're supposed to delve into science and engineering?
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever and if you knew anything about anything you would know that the field of engineering is sky-rocketting and thus the demographics of the people working in that field would NOT be a reliable source on whether we have the ability to 'comprehend logic'. Less than a few decades after the paramount of our opression we have come far. We even outnumber you priviledged fools in higher education.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever Yeah, you western women are always complaining about some "oppression". Guess what? So was my people here in America. In fact, back then if any of us were given any education, we'd be put to death. Despite that, many philosophers, pioneers, and businessfolks still emerged despite us being racially opppressed.
So that "oppressive" mantra has to go. And another thing: If you western women were so smart, why are you eliminating capitalism, which is the basis of an ecomomy?
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight For you information, that you clearly lack, I never play the "oppression" card unless some sexist tries to bring up the past or how we're not 'leaders' in the "most respected' fields in the present. Ifyou know anything about science you'd be familiar with the scientific method. When experimenting and comparing to different groups it has to in a controlled environment. In other words they have to have the SAME surrounding. Even with individuals you can't compare their
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever accomplishments because they went through different things.So how the hell would you be able to compare whole groups of people that have OBVIOUSLY had different experiences or mind-sets. willie lynch mastered in breaking down the mentality of slaves. Today in the modern world, influences from the past to reemerge. If we were never expected to even work or get a damn education how would us as a whole be leaders in these fields. It takes time to change this way of thinking.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever The mere fact that there are women in these fields PROVE that we are able to do it. Men aren't NEARLY as pressured in the media. magazines, television, advertisements, and men themselves pressure us heavily to be beautiful. Have you ever ridiculed a female because of her appearance? In the past few decades there is no one more opressed than the black woman. So i think i know a thing or two about opression. I scored in the top 1 percentile in science last year.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever higher than ANYONE in my class. and top 2 percentile in Math. I am proof. Humans are variant individually, not sexually.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever Ok, look at your third comment. It says: "So after centuries of oppression and deprivation of proper education we're supposed to delve into science and engineering?" That seems to me that you are playing the oppression card.
And if you really think that women are more dominant in the workforce, then y are there accusations of "gender wage gap"? That would mean that there are women getting paid more than other women, yet it's still an issue.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight And about this "gender intellect", why is it throughout history that inventions have been patented by men much more than women, and the progress of sciences have been attributed in men? And in fact, y has the US Gross Domestic Product has been lower in an inverse relation to women in the workforce?
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight See THIS is when i bring up oppression. if you say throughout history and we can BOTH agree that throughout history women weren't given the same advantages why the hell would you bring it up....no reason skills. That's like me whipping you every time you reach for a pie in a food contest and then go on and on about how you reached for less pie than others because you have less intellect. IT MAKES NO SENSE.......
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight No one said that women are more dominant in the workforce. If i did then i would be lying.I'm saying that you cant base their intellect on the fact that they aren't, it's stupid. that's like saying that because 63% of homeless people are men that women are smarter. I've heard little girlz say that they want to be housewives when they grow older. Now where do you think they got that from?
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever If little girls say that they want to be housewives, then that's what they say. Just b/c someone says they want to be something doesn't mean that they're going to pursue that. I said that I wanted to be a deacon of a church, but I'm not. And if you really believe that social conditioning is absolute in determining one's intellectual capacity, you're sorely mistaken. If you reseach history for any slave/oppressed people, you'll see that they STILL retained ideas and info.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight
no, but social conditioning DOES determine what someone wants to pursue in life career-wise which for some weird reason you believe has a lot to do with intelligence. Give me ONE opressed people that have overtly ran a field that they were once prevented from participating in.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever If Black History isn't a great example of how many people contributed to great advances despite being hated and oppressed , then Idk how else to convince you.
It would take me at least 54,000 characters to give you many historic examples of how many enslaved/oppressed people were still be able to contribute to human greatness, but I'll leave that up to you to do the research.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight so you're saying that women didn't contribute to human 'greatness'? maybe YOU are the one that needs to do the research. I am well aware of the accomplishments of MY black people. Yet we are not overtly running anything. People still criticize my people just like you are criticizing my gender. By forgetting the good and not accounting in factors that lead to the bad.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever No, not as much as men did. In fact, during the civil right era, WE black men were killed much more than you black women were.
And another thing, the reason why OUR people aren't running anything is b/c we got this "crab in the bucket" mentality in that those of us who aspire to be productive and organized are ostracized and shunned by the majority b/c it's seen as being a "self-hating sellout"
And w/ criticism: There's always going to be that, regardless who it's by.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
@ApollosInsight exactly. although during that era men got hit harder, women were hit more long lasting. Men were let into higher education first, and were let in the work force first. Well someone can also say that WHITE men contributed more than BLACK men did. different circumstances. Yes MEN "contributed" more than WOMEN in technology and what not. different circumstances. I do not nkow how you cannot see the parallels .
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever Let me remind you again about the social status of the civil-rights era:
1. White man
2.white woman
3.non-whites,non-blacks
4.Black woman
5.Black man.
We as black men were the last to be hired, first to be fired. We as BM have come along way to actually gaining a place in society until the emergence of the femininst era which put us back in square one, separating us from our families.
Yet, we still have contributed to many examples of success in this country.
ApollosInsight 1 year ago
Comment removed
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ApollosInsight
i beg to differ, if even in the white society women were considered of less value why does it change with the blacks?
1. White man
2.white woman
3.non-whites,non-blacks
4.Black man
5.Black woman.
yes, you were the last to be hired, first to be fired. Black women were never to hired and thus never to be fired unless we were to give the white man pleasure.
belizeangal4ever 1 year ago
@belizeangal4ever Sure, you can't JUDGE people based on sex because of the vast amount of variation, but that there isn't a difference between male/female intelligence is just nonsense, and is completely unsupported scientifically. Science has shown that, on a bell curve, women and men have very similar mean intelligence, but men have a significantly lower peak and higher std dev, meaning there are more men than women who are geniuses/idiots. And the results show extremely low alpha value
XZohar123 6 months ago