Its just ok. But only Because the original was such a mindblower. Being a true Beatles expert and at 57 still having a successful music career, I feel like I know when something is great. This one, ok, but its only an interpretation, not a creation.
its a brilliant song and a brilliant cover....piercing voice...balanced...imaginatively tantalising from marr.....and slow is just as good as fast. the words attempt to guide seers into other realms.......and it does look like noel is in another world as are all the others. power to the shamans .....away from evil capitalism.....through to eternity...
point blank the brothers dicks... they love lennon and hate paul... lets see what they have to say when they are 70 years old... they get away with loving lennon cuz he died at 40.. cant wait to hear what the brothers have to say when thay turn 70 years old.
I don't think that John would hate Oasis, I think he would be flattered and appreciate them. They do a perfect job of a new Beatles sound, but not a complete rip-off at all.
John Lennon would absolutely despise Oasis. One because they ripped The Beatles off to the heavens, two because they ripped HIM off - his solo stuff. And lastly because Noel came out with comments like 'I hope he catches aids and dies' directed at Damon Albarn. Lennon was an avid ambassador for peace, he would have had no time for somebody coming out with comments like that. Now Radiohead, there's a band that Lennon would have liked.
@MrThegnome777 No there's nothing wrong with that! But comparing yourselves to Led Zeppelin?! Come on, that is a bit far, if Oasis are up there with the greats in 30/40 years then I will come back to this video and say I was wrong!
@MrThegnome777 Yeah that's true, over the past 5/6 years they have totally appealed to a new generation. I do agree LZ were overrated but popular critics love them so when Oasis are considered the same then that's when those opinions can be justified. LZ were probably the best band of all time in terms of musicianship.
Do you mean after Don't Believe The Truth? But hey, I don't think anybody has forgotten just how big they were in the mid-90s. I belong to the category of people who were attracted by Heathen Chemistry. When it came out in 2002 (I was 17) I though "This is it!" I don't need no critics' opinions because that's just some more opinions by some more people, not necessarily smarter than me. I'm saying this because it's not critics who should form our musical taste, but ourselves.
And in terms of musicianship... heh... Deep Purple would sweep the floor, Pink Floyd could. Gilmour is not as technically good, but I love him more because he's so soulful. Blackmore could do anything Page did and more. Zep had no keyboardist (well, few bits by Jonesy, who actually is really talented). Plant could barely sing right in live gigs. Also, try asking him to do Child In Time...
Oasis are not virtuosos, but they're so much closer to us ordinary people :) The first solo from Live Forever. It's so pure, so soulful... I can't stand Page playing blues all or most of the time. I hate falling asleep, I love being kept intrigued. But oh, that's rather personal, this bit here.
Oasis has no talent , "jumping other peoples trains" thats all. Lucky Douches, or good Karma either way Oasis's success is testimony to how horrible the 90's were musically !!!!!!
too many people put music down when noel gallagher is mentioned in the same breath but this is a fantastic cover! kurtcobain clearly hasnt listened too the sitar and johnny marr guitar parts!
Well you can't expect him to duplicate what John did! No one can do that! So haters why don't you try to go out there yourselves and prove yourself right! Idiots! Any way can anyone tell me that when was this? And well whats the name of the show? Because it looks amazing! A very fine tribute to John Lennon indeed, keeping his spirit alive!
you fucking nobs have no idea what ur talking bout...as covers go this is the bollocks..the spirit of lennon lives on through the likes of noel..so throw ur shit put downs away and fucking appreciate...
@greshgallagher The spirit of John Lennon lives through the music John recorded. I don't really like their version of Tomorrow Never Knows. It lacks what The Beatles did on the record. Now I know it's near impossible to redo what they live for this song, but they should've atleast kept it at the speed The Beatles did it.
@greshgallagher If any of these folk moaning knew anything about the Beatles then they'd know that the wat this version sounds is how Lennon envisaged. He wanted it to sound like a monk chanting and there is a version similar to Noels on The Beatles anthology 2 album. I really like this version, obviously it's not gonna be as good as the original but it's still amazing none the less...!!!
now this is a live track - noel and johnny marr the two biggest legends covering a fookin tune dedicatede to a genius!!! and to top it all off it's introduced the sexiest woman ever
Now then Johnny git tar. play nicely and dont be so jealous. How come you have no videos on your channel? we wanna see you playing recorder in the school play dont we lads? that will be worth a comment or two. and take off that gimp mask it could do with the occasional rinse. ya slavering twat
This is cool. Oasis are the best, they should cover some Rolling Stones songs. Can you imagine them doing Sympathy For The Devil, Gimme Shelter, Love Is Strong? Eight Miles High by The Byrds would be a good song for Oasis to cover too!
Noooo! Oasis guitarist can't solo like Mick Taylor on Gimme Shelter or Sympathy, Oasis are better when they play their own songs!!! Especially the songs from the 2 first albums^^
Mods, you've totally missed the point i was making. I was saying you could release the original now and still it would be a hit in any dance club. I also said i didnt like the version. Noel G like most other "arists" assume they can sing any song and it will be good - no, some things they do are sh*t and this is one of them. Therefore, it's do do with what ever people want to comment about it. Sooner or later he'll be like Macca, churning out shite because he relies on past achievments.
Dont like it, you could release the original and play it in Ministry of Sound as it sounds like a Chemical Brothers tune - or their tunes sound like Tomorrow Never Knows should i say, thats how advanced it was, i mean, all you have to do is emphasise the beat more digitally. The other versions Noel has done are ok but this sounds wrong and takes away form the original - in my opinion.
Firstly,ministry of sound has nothing to do with this.dance music has nothing to do with this.Second,this is a collaboration off artists who have the utmost respect for the beatles and their music.Finally,would the beatles play at the ministry of sound?nah.listen again.
lol The roses were an influencial band but Weren't amazing, Name the roses good songs? I can name them on one hand? name oasis great songs I haven't got enough fingers or toes lol
comparing oasis to some of the most influential bands of all time. different time, different tunes. under your idiotic guidance we could compare the stone roses, smiths to floyd, the who and the beatles? shut your mouth fool.
not really because the only reason i chose my user name was because i signed in as i watched a seahorses tune on you tube.so i just made up a name on the spot.
if you looked at my favouries on my profile you would realise that i have a wide variety, of bands that i like that are nowhere near oasis.
i just find oasis to be embarissingly derivative but i watched this tune waiting to be surprised.i just find that oasis's reliance on the whole beatles thing to be kind of embarresing for them
The Gallagher's have always wanted to be the Beatles, yet Lennon had an intellect and ideology of love and peace that practically resonated from him, whereas Oasis shared more of the nihilism of the Sex Pistols. I think Lennon would have been flattered, but he would have thought Liam in particular to be a prick!
I don't really think so, if they wanted to be The Bealtes... why all those diferences? I mean Oasis is more agressive and they are a little sarcastic... in music and personality, The Beatles are happinnes and love, they are one of the biggest influences in Oasis but I don't see them like The Beatles. Anyway Both of The Bands are the very best Noel Gallagher Paul McCartney/ John Lennon the best songwritters in history Oasis and The Beatles the best bands in history.
Ever listened to Noel/Liam talking about the beatles? Ever listened to any Oasis songs?! They are full of direct beatles lyrics/influences/chords/songs.....being hugely infuenced by another band doesn't mean you have to be identical to them. Oasis also have the Sex Pistols, Slade, Roses etc.
Lennon meant well but was misguided - his support of the IRA etc. and some of his lyrics..."imagine no possessions"....yeah, come on, John, living in a million dollar apartment in New York!!!!!
Classic song, great rendition from Noel, Gem & Johnny Marr! Has anyone heard the Phil Collins version that was on his Face Value album 1981, in tribute to John Lennon that's cool too!!!
The Beatles were SOOO ahead of their time - as is evidenced by the fact that the lyrics are still pertinent in 2008 - 42 years AFTER this song was first recorded....
people that slag oasis base their (only) argument on oasis not being popular anymore which is complete and utter shite! they can sell out any stadium on tour easily, and there last 2 albums have shifted around 5 million copies and they have a massive fanbase. a 90s band? piss off!
No, popularity had nothing to do with it, because as you say they are still a commercially successful band. But then so were the Spice Girls. My criticism of Oasis is that their music has got worse over the last 15 years, not better (which is also reflected in their comparitive album sales out of interest) and one of the reasons for this is that they show very little interest in developing their sound. Critical opinions agrees: DM and MG were superb, but since then there's been nothing to rival
the hindu times, stop crying your heart out, little by little, go let it out, lyla, she is love, be here now, dya know what i mean, fadin' out, the meaning of soul, turn up the sun, a bell will ring are all up there with mg and dm of coarse they are the best two but only in consistancy and you cant say there music has gotten worse
Well, I can say it and I do. If you disagree, that's fine. What is, I think, difficult to argue against, is that they have not progressed or shown any interest in developing their sound or being innovative or exploring new themes. Also, they absolutely nothing to say in their songs. At least there was a core, raw heart to DM - when Liam sang "live forever" and "rock and roll start" etc, I believed him.
i totally agree with you about the importance and passion of the music that has faded with time but noel has admitted that but the quality has not changed.
but he says that every album is the best thing they've ever done! The reality is that they peaked with DM and MG, which were exceptional, and subsequent albums were just OK, with some good songs thrown in now and then. The thing is, though, that I've come to realise about Oasis, is that truly great artists want to explore different ground and challenge themselves and their audience with new ideas, not just repeat the same old formula time after time after time after time
That's a pre-GCSE debating logic. No one can have a view on anything unless they have personally done it better? So, that would put every teacher, journalist and historian out of a job, then, immediately. I suggest that you learn that, on a discussion forum, designed to allow people to share their views, there will from time to time, as in life in general, be people who - shock!! - have different views than you. Resorting to insults is the way of the child, or pre-GCSE level debating.
This is pretty good but I can barely hear Noel's voice. I still like Sheila Chandra's version the best.
DrummerGrrrl 6 months ago
Its just ok. But only Because the original was such a mindblower. Being a true Beatles expert and at 57 still having a successful music career, I feel like I know when something is great. This one, ok, but its only an interpretation, not a creation.
124slowhand 8 months ago
Love the mid-eastern vibe
lthom33 8 months ago
if only they could have played a reversed guitar solo as well
smilingemovlogs 9 months ago
I'm desperately looking for a high quality recording of this performance (a.k.a soundboard, flac). Anyone?
adioqier 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if john lennon and george harrison were alive, they'll surely love this.
x421x 10 months ago
Who needs Liam...? This is still Ace - need a version with awesome audio now! lol
mr2gti 11 months ago
its a brilliant song and a brilliant cover....piercing voice...balanced...imaginatively tantalising from marr.....and slow is just as good as fast. the words attempt to guide seers into other realms.......and it does look like noel is in another world as are all the others. power to the shamans .....away from evil capitalism.....through to eternity...
TheDiamond909 1 year ago
I'm sorry, but I can't listen to the arrogant pricks of Oasis. Johnny Marr I respect, the other two just suck.
JNugent74 1 year ago
horrível!!!!!rídiculo!!!que versão horrível!!!
vinifolk39 1 year ago
what year was here ?
omo3tetia4 1 year ago
fckn mint johnny marr the solo omg
RockstarSupernova25 1 year ago
Good cover, The Beatles and Oasis will Live Forever!!!
BeHereNow93 1 year ago 3
banging cover!!
malhar94 1 year ago
Gem, stick with noel, so good together....
angelcity1969 1 year ago
miss U noeel!!
angali21 1 year ago
where is the drum that i love from the original?
GoucheGizmo 1 year ago 3
@GoucheGizmo Listen to the ORIGINAL original version- from Anthology 2. Then you'll understand what this is.
planetery 1 year ago
point blank the brothers dicks... they love lennon and hate paul... lets see what they have to say when they are 70 years old... they get away with loving lennon cuz he died at 40.. cant wait to hear what the brothers have to say when thay turn 70 years old.
fletch2240 1 year ago
@fletch2240 They don't hate Paul! Noel and Noel even worked together!
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
Noel's voice has nothing to do with this song. Liam should've done that.
nowicanseeporns 1 year ago
I don't think that John would hate Oasis, I think he would be flattered and appreciate them. They do a perfect job of a new Beatles sound, but not a complete rip-off at all.
DanM25456 1 year ago
@DanM25456 george martin made the beatles sound,. FACT.
dan32113 1 year ago
John Lennon would absolutely despise Oasis. One because they ripped The Beatles off to the heavens, two because they ripped HIM off - his solo stuff. And lastly because Noel came out with comments like 'I hope he catches aids and dies' directed at Damon Albarn. Lennon was an avid ambassador for peace, he would have had no time for somebody coming out with comments like that. Now Radiohead, there's a band that Lennon would have liked.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
Ha! Lennon had a big mouth himself.
And he was not interested in just melodies, he was even more into lyrics. Fact coz that's what he said.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 Yeah I know he did. He had a big mouth, but nowhere near that of 90's Gallagher brothers, it was so pathetically cringeworthy.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
"it was so pathetically cringeworthy. "
Was it? I guess it's just my opinion, but nobody's perfect, but we can be honest, and I believe the bros are.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 'I'd say at this stage in our career we are on par with Led Zeppelin' - Noel Gallagher, 1998.
'Knebworth Park was certainly the greatest gig in music history' - Liam Gallagher, 1997
There's being honest then there's just being arrogant and pathetic, and Liam constantly crosses that line.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
Why is it bad to realize you're the best, at least currently!? My credo is, know your price and don't lower or higher it.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 No there's nothing wrong with that! But comparing yourselves to Led Zeppelin?! Come on, that is a bit far, if Oasis are up there with the greats in 30/40 years then I will come back to this video and say I was wrong!
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
Well, there's not that much time left till 30 years, and so far there's not a slightest sign of Oasis fame fading away ;)
And second, LZ are overrated. There are/were bands way more interesting. Not saying LZ are shit, though.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 Yeah that's true, over the past 5/6 years they have totally appealed to a new generation. I do agree LZ were overrated but popular critics love them so when Oasis are considered the same then that's when those opinions can be justified. LZ were probably the best band of all time in terms of musicianship.
bigdunk9 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
Do you mean after Don't Believe The Truth? But hey, I don't think anybody has forgotten just how big they were in the mid-90s. I belong to the category of people who were attracted by Heathen Chemistry. When it came out in 2002 (I was 17) I though "This is it!" I don't need no critics' opinions because that's just some more opinions by some more people, not necessarily smarter than me. I'm saying this because it's not critics who should form our musical taste, but ourselves.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
part 2
And in terms of musicianship... heh... Deep Purple would sweep the floor, Pink Floyd could. Gilmour is not as technically good, but I love him more because he's so soulful. Blackmore could do anything Page did and more. Zep had no keyboardist (well, few bits by Jonesy, who actually is really talented). Plant could barely sing right in live gigs. Also, try asking him to do Child In Time...
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@bigdunk9
part 3
Oasis are not virtuosos, but they're so much closer to us ordinary people :) The first solo from Live Forever. It's so pure, so soulful... I can't stand Page playing blues all or most of the time. I hate falling asleep, I love being kept intrigued. But oh, that's rather personal, this bit here.
So... there you have my opinion, mate ;)
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
why argue evryone knows the beatles evrithing they touch became classic so ofcoure the original version is better but is a good cover
osito060308 1 year ago
@osito060308 I think the original is a bit boring, actually.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 How can you say the original is boring?! This one is slow and repetitive.
BeatleFloydZeppelin 1 year ago
@BeatleFloydZeppelin
Because I heard the original, and being faster and not repetitive than slow does not guarantee a brilliant track.
MrThegnome777 1 year ago
@MrThegnome777 Ya but the beatles version IS a brilliant track.
BeatleFloydZeppelin 1 year ago
Esse moleque cantando e tocando Tomorrow Never Knows, com muito menos recurso, é bem melhor que oasis: watch?v=BlK7hrUtVH0&feature=related
enmelo2008 1 year ago
Always dug this song. I prefer the Fab Faux's version of this. There's a few vids of Fab Faux on youtube. Look them up.
dkmi 1 year ago
this ones for you TheManolakis.....
You are a cunt pal.........I hope your earholes turn into arseholes and shit roles off your fucking shoulders man........
Stupid American Fuckhead.........
hooligan377 2 years ago
any 1 no wat effect johnny marr is usin ere ??? ...
ccfcman1 2 years ago
talent
loombaron 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oasis has no talent , "jumping other peoples trains" thats all. Lucky Douches, or good Karma either way Oasis's success is testimony to how horrible the 90's were musically !!!!!!
TheManolakis 2 years ago
ask yourself why johnny marr, the man who fucking made the smiths what they were, would cover this song with them if they are "lucky douches".
fuck off if you dont enjoy it
treytoshable 2 years ago 2
I heard a better version of this song. I think it was by The Beatles.
Mextazectaces 2 years ago 3
so are you implying that this was a bad cover, because if you are then youre just a complete moron that knows nothing about music.
ninetygnyc 2 years ago
I love the Beatles, Smiths, & Oasis, but this was a waste of talent.
bmesiasbmesias 2 years ago
is prefer the beatles version, its more energetic.
SamuBolado 2 years ago 3
i agree.. the beatles one was much fuller..
but perhaps that could be because this is a live version and this song is too trippy to get spot on live..
the fact that the beatles version is better than somebody with as much talent as noel gallagher rele shows you how good the beatles actually were..
witham06 2 years ago 3
Noel Gallagher is GOD.
gemarcher83 2 years ago
This SO needs releasing - in ultra-mint audiophile quality.
mr2gti 2 years ago
i remember this,the Lennon tribute thing,cos Noel picked the hardest Lennon tune to cover
i reckon there should be a national Lennon day where every1 gets a day off work,and 1 of these shows every year,on the 8th,a tribute show
carlos7217 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Noel Gallagher you suck D;
roketjack 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
instrumentally, its good, but personally i just can't stand noels singing...
TheDivineAberration 2 years ago
total agree
ppefkev 2 years ago
No doubt Lennon would of approved!
sanfranrain 2 years ago 4
SMASHING..
wisesatyr72 2 years ago
too many people put music down when noel gallagher is mentioned in the same breath but this is a fantastic cover! kurtcobain clearly hasnt listened too the sitar and johnny marr guitar parts!
TUKOOTHEBAND 2 years ago 2
this lacking the drum parts already sucked!
ldeguzman 2 years ago
it lacks Ringo. : (
mysteryskater48 2 years ago
Well you can't expect him to duplicate what John did! No one can do that! So haters why don't you try to go out there yourselves and prove yourself right! Idiots! Any way can anyone tell me that when was this? And well whats the name of the show? Because it looks amazing! A very fine tribute to John Lennon indeed, keeping his spirit alive!
kreeepyy 2 years ago 2
wtf is this .....bull shit
ppefkev 2 years ago
you fucking nobs have no idea what ur talking bout...as covers go this is the bollocks..the spirit of lennon lives on through the likes of noel..so throw ur shit put downs away and fucking appreciate...
greshgallagher 2 years ago 22
@greshgallagher
sure, that's true at 100%.
Noel have the beatles heart
delax1981 1 year ago
@greshgallagher The spirit of John Lennon lives through the music John recorded. I don't really like their version of Tomorrow Never Knows. It lacks what The Beatles did on the record. Now I know it's near impossible to redo what they live for this song, but they should've atleast kept it at the speed The Beatles did it.
Marshallsg 1 year ago
@greshgallagher Too right...its fucking awesome this is....
TheDiamond909 1 year ago
@greshgallagher If any of these folk moaning knew anything about the Beatles then they'd know that the wat this version sounds is how Lennon envisaged. He wanted it to sound like a monk chanting and there is a version similar to Noels on The Beatles anthology 2 album. I really like this version, obviously it's not gonna be as good as the original but it's still amazing none the less...!!!
moddave78 10 months ago
i am sorry but they took the psychedelic sound out and sounds bad
kurtcobain628 2 years ago
hahahahaha - sounds like monkey farts
ncaso 2 years ago
Yuck.
openswimmer 2 years ago
HORRIBLE.
joshpeacock1991 2 years ago
how much does a leslie cost cause i want this fucking vocal effect?
lloyd525 2 years ago
AWESOME
twagstaffe 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not tomorrow never knows...its oasis shite using lennons lyrics...lennon is probably turning over in his urn !
karlshoneybear 2 years ago
I actually kind of like this. This kept the spirit of the original and changed it up a bit. Good job.
astrosteve 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that pure shit .... disgusting...
grooveconnection 2 years ago
Nice cover, but they should have got Zak Starkey to drum.
LikelyLibertine 2 years ago 4
Who? ;)
ZachStarkey 2 years ago
johnny marr's guitar is one of the most mind blowing sounds i have ever heard. He is gotta be the best british guitarist of all time
SuperMojoRisin 2 years ago 5
viva la page
LedZeppelinSx66 2 years ago
lol
oknarbtal 2 years ago
it lacks the drums, the most characteristic part of the song
ElFrankus 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wheres the proper cool beat gone its shit without that.
CCSofChocolatesvill 2 years ago
now this is a live track - noel and johnny marr the two biggest legends covering a fookin tune dedicatede to a genius!!! and to top it all off it's introduced the sexiest woman ever
active85858585 2 years ago
noel gallagher,, one of the two biggest legends? hahahahahahaha
danielinsporto 2 years ago
nice cover. i love the original but this one is great too. love the indian touch caused by the tablas .
Shaguar66 2 years ago 2
Have a spliff, and listen to this! BLOWS YOUR FUCKING MIND!!!!
martyn448 2 years ago
u would'nt know good music if it bit u on ur baggy cock streched but hole i saw u tryin to play guiatr u faggit
MrJohnnyguitar1968 2 years ago
Comment removed
LittleAlfie2009 2 years ago
Now then Johnny git tar. play nicely and dont be so jealous. How come you have no videos on your channel? we wanna see you playing recorder in the school play dont we lads? that will be worth a comment or two. and take off that gimp mask it could do with the occasional rinse. ya slavering twat
Geordieslapheed 2 years ago
fuck u geordieslapheed. wheres urs u havr non either
MrJohnnyguitar1968 2 years ago
Oh come on guys, the Beatles' original blows this into a cocked hat. And anyone with a functioning brain can hear that.
pachelbellringer 2 years ago 2
Not bad, quite good.
friedrichjulian 2 years ago
what do you mean never touch a classic its a beatle's tribute you plonker !!!!!!!!!!
rpurdy777 2 years ago
This is cool. Oasis are the best, they should cover some Rolling Stones songs. Can you imagine them doing Sympathy For The Devil, Gimme Shelter, Love Is Strong? Eight Miles High by The Byrds would be a good song for Oasis to cover too!
SkankBangertonsays 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oasis is the worst cover band, they should stick to their own songs
dockaiser 2 years ago
Noooo! Oasis guitarist can't solo like Mick Taylor on Gimme Shelter or Sympathy, Oasis are better when they play their own songs!!! Especially the songs from the 2 first albums^^
oclero 2 years ago 3
They did a pretty good cover of Street Fighting Man on the All Around the World single from 1998.
jbarone79 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SHIT !
Never touch a classic.
1ingle 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oasis -same old shit,boring as fuck. noel gallacher is like a wooden thunderbird!
mtw1945 2 years ago
trippy...
homesicksubterranean 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God oasis are boring.
Phyte 2 years ago
takes one to recognice another
sumamme 2 years ago
Nice.
Phyte 2 years ago
Mods, you've totally missed the point i was making. I was saying you could release the original now and still it would be a hit in any dance club. I also said i didnt like the version. Noel G like most other "arists" assume they can sing any song and it will be good - no, some things they do are sh*t and this is one of them. Therefore, it's do do with what ever people want to comment about it. Sooner or later he'll be like Macca, churning out shite because he relies on past achievments.
august251976 2 years ago
good performance
piazzazama 2 years ago
fantastic cover, and oasis are the only one who are able to cover beatles songs (imo).
konstantinvansaar 3 years ago 13
you are correct.
NewGoldStandard 3 years ago 2
I agreee
magogoroks 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@konstantinvansaar thats some shit you are taking there pal!!
jmtbrc 1 year ago
swallowthemind you prick
britpopmodliz 3 years ago
thats class
britpopmodliz 3 years ago
My Fav Beatles track and this cover is amazing!!!
steg0979 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
hmm bet noel doesn't have a problem it is a one chord song after all.. crap over rated sack of shit that he is...
swallowthemind 3 years ago
Comment removed
britpopmodliz 3 years ago
Not a very brilliant cover...
pacoiec 3 years ago
Dont like it, you could release the original and play it in Ministry of Sound as it sounds like a Chemical Brothers tune - or their tunes sound like Tomorrow Never Knows should i say, thats how advanced it was, i mean, all you have to do is emphasise the beat more digitally. The other versions Noel has done are ok but this sounds wrong and takes away form the original - in my opinion.
august251976 3 years ago
Firstly,ministry of sound has nothing to do with this.dance music has nothing to do with this.Second,this is a collaboration off artists who have the utmost respect for the beatles and their music.Finally,would the beatles play at the ministry of sound?nah.listen again.
mods75 2 years ago
amazing.thats how the beatles would have sounded,if they had that technology in the 60,s
mods75 3 years ago
cool when was this?
paul2008uk 3 years ago
this woz live on tv december 2000.the best cover of tomorrow never knows u will ever hear.thats my opinion.enjoy.......
mods75 3 years ago
Listen to the color of your dreams....nice! thxo
Finallybenunderstood 3 years ago 2
He tried something like this with "who feels love", also the importance of being idle and I'm only sleeping are similar
11141983 3 years ago 2
i agree with " who feels love" but" the importance of being idle" is a whole different story mate
rathcooligan2006 3 years ago 2
Unbelievable!!
Stage perfoming?
Well done!!!!!!!!!!
fujicity 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck me, this is how you murder a decent song.
mrsteadyhands 3 years ago
The Chameleons UK covered this better. Then again, I tried many times but Oasis just couldn't reach me.
rdw7300 3 years ago
I love this song, but this has not worked, sorry!
tgfootie444 3 years ago
guitar work was very well done
frostythebush 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oasis one of the best bands in history?? dont make me laugh bitterly.
the roses for one were better, the beach boys etc.
oasis are and still are beatles obsessives thats why theyl never be graet
squirehorse 3 years ago
lol The roses were an influencial band but Weren't amazing, Name the roses good songs? I can name them on one hand? name oasis great songs I haven't got enough fingers or toes lol
OASIS SECOND ONLY TO THE BEATLES!!
100spratty 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats hilarious that you believe that.
noel G would be the first to admit that the roses were a much better band
squirehorse 3 years ago
comparing oasis to some of the most influential bands of all time. different time, different tunes. under your idiotic guidance we could compare the stone roses, smiths to floyd, the who and the beatles? shut your mouth fool.
jptrol 3 years ago
well someone below claimed noel gallacher was ona par with mccartney/lennon, which is idiotic to say the least
squirehorse 3 years ago
How can you call someone an obsessive twat when your name is Squirehorse? bit obsessive dont you think?
Safeness07 3 years ago
not really because the only reason i chose my user name was because i signed in as i watched a seahorses tune on you tube.so i just made up a name on the spot.
if you looked at my favouries on my profile you would realise that i have a wide variety, of bands that i like that are nowhere near oasis.
i just find oasis to be embarissingly derivative but i watched this tune waiting to be surprised.i just find that oasis's reliance on the whole beatles thing to be kind of embarresing for them
squirehorse 3 years ago
what band isnt Beatles obsessive?
krankerrrr 3 years ago 3
what man isnt beatles obsessive
loko5555 3 years ago 4
liam sounds abit likes he's trying to imitate john lennon
daemonicman 3 years ago
wheres liam at?
Ramu911 3 years ago
liam's trying so hard to be lennon here, that he magically transformed himself into his brother noel
tigarx 3 years ago 3
HORRIBLE!
RhumOnFire 3 years ago
boring as fuck. put me to sleep
gorillazfan2006 3 years ago
Not the easiest song to cover. Really great version. Thanks for sharing this.
SgtDazz 3 years ago 2
That Johnny Marr could go far
qmark78 3 years ago 3
is it me or was that amasing?
ageist3 3 years ago
anyone agrees that Johnny Marr's work on these one is amazing?
i would bet that this was a huge influence for noel to write stop the clocks
snovoa10 3 years ago 3
when Noel was 13, Johnny was only 15. :-)
therabbit27 3 years ago
Liam does have those nihilistic qualities but lennon was a prick as well.
juck 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This cover sucks!!!
hsalgado1974 3 years ago
The Gallagher's have always wanted to be the Beatles, yet Lennon had an intellect and ideology of love and peace that practically resonated from him, whereas Oasis shared more of the nihilism of the Sex Pistols. I think Lennon would have been flattered, but he would have thought Liam in particular to be a prick!
tomsega 3 years ago 2
i agree
mansell863 3 years ago 2
I don't really think so, if they wanted to be The Bealtes... why all those diferences? I mean Oasis is more agressive and they are a little sarcastic... in music and personality, The Beatles are happinnes and love, they are one of the biggest influences in Oasis but I don't see them like The Beatles. Anyway Both of The Bands are the very best Noel Gallagher Paul McCartney/ John Lennon the best songwritters in history Oasis and The Beatles the best bands in history.
AlXV 3 years ago
Ever listened to Noel/Liam talking about the beatles? Ever listened to any Oasis songs?! They are full of direct beatles lyrics/influences/chords/songs.....being hugely infuenced by another band doesn't mean you have to be identical to them. Oasis also have the Sex Pistols, Slade, Roses etc.
219970 3 years ago
Lennon meant well but was misguided - his support of the IRA etc. and some of his lyrics..."imagine no possessions"....yeah, come on, John, living in a million dollar apartment in New York!!!!!
219970 3 years ago
Beautiful cover of the song that got me into LSD Thankyou
RATTLEY67 3 years ago 3
This song it's not the same without the drum beat
yahikoli 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Johnny is awesome but Noel ruins this song! Fucking patsy faced Brit fag!!!
BombJapan 3 years ago
So jonny marr is awsome.But,noel is a brit fag?Sorry to brake it to you,but jonny's british to dickhead!!!!Hope you feel like the fuckwit you are!!!!
Mozzarizzle 3 years ago
haha u really are a tit arnt u
JDKennedy1 3 years ago
Classic song, great rendition from Noel, Gem & Johnny Marr! Has anyone heard the Phil Collins version that was on his Face Value album 1981, in tribute to John Lennon that's cool too!!!
jordhart1 3 years ago
fuckin'great!
this version looks like who feels love?
noel is a genius,and Marr too!
gemarcher83 3 years ago
The Beatles were SOOO ahead of their time - as is evidenced by the fact that the lyrics are still pertinent in 2008 - 42 years AFTER this song was first recorded....
Noel did a great job tho...love it still!
JazzyBabe56 3 years ago
people that slag oasis base their (only) argument on oasis not being popular anymore which is complete and utter shite! they can sell out any stadium on tour easily, and there last 2 albums have shifted around 5 million copies and they have a massive fanbase. a 90s band? piss off!
bigdaveupload 3 years ago
No, popularity had nothing to do with it, because as you say they are still a commercially successful band. But then so were the Spice Girls. My criticism of Oasis is that their music has got worse over the last 15 years, not better (which is also reflected in their comparitive album sales out of interest) and one of the reasons for this is that they show very little interest in developing their sound. Critical opinions agrees: DM and MG were superb, but since then there's been nothing to rival
219970 3 years ago
the hindu times, stop crying your heart out, little by little, go let it out, lyla, she is love, be here now, dya know what i mean, fadin' out, the meaning of soul, turn up the sun, a bell will ring are all up there with mg and dm of coarse they are the best two but only in consistancy and you cant say there music has gotten worse
AlexBlondie92 3 years ago
Well, I can say it and I do. If you disagree, that's fine. What is, I think, difficult to argue against, is that they have not progressed or shown any interest in developing their sound or being innovative or exploring new themes. Also, they absolutely nothing to say in their songs. At least there was a core, raw heart to DM - when Liam sang "live forever" and "rock and roll start" etc, I believed him.
219970 3 years ago
i totally agree with you about the importance and passion of the music that has faded with time but noel has admitted that but the quality has not changed.
AlexBlondie92 3 years ago
but he says that every album is the best thing they've ever done! The reality is that they peaked with DM and MG, which were exceptional, and subsequent albums were just OK, with some good songs thrown in now and then. The thing is, though, that I've come to realise about Oasis, is that truly great artists want to explore different ground and challenge themselves and their audience with new ideas, not just repeat the same old formula time after time after time after time
219970 3 years ago
he says its the best thing since definatley maybe
AlexBlondie92 3 years ago
better than your albums though eh matey. get a life, sit back and just enjoy oasis for fuck sake!
gunlodge 3 years ago
That's a pre-GCSE debating logic. No one can have a view on anything unless they have personally done it better? So, that would put every teacher, journalist and historian out of a job, then, immediately. I suggest that you learn that, on a discussion forum, designed to allow people to share their views, there will from time to time, as in life in general, be people who - shock!! - have different views than you. Resorting to insults is the way of the child, or pre-GCSE level debating.
219970 3 years ago
suck my cock :D
gunlodge 3 years ago
That's pre-school.
And why do you want me to suck your cock? Are you gay?
Very strange.
219970 3 years ago
why don't you want to? are YOU gay? aaaah!! gay!!