ONE-STATE SOLUTION = All people's fall under same rule of law, same rights, same land, same borders. -- IT WON'T WORK = Israel wants a "Jewish State". Arab birthrates are up and Jewish birthrates are down. Jews would eventually be the MINORITY in Israel. = NO ONE-STATE
.
.
TWO-STATE = Israel is occupying the West Bank, (Palestinian State).
.
Israeli occupation and settlement infrastructure of "Jewish Only" highways and cities take up the land. = NO TWO-STATE.
the jewish spy Jonathan Pollard advised the USA government never to allow any jews access to secured files because their first loyalty would always be to Communism and Zionism. The AIPAC spies Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman were allowed to skate free because the jews have enjoyed total control over the USA dollar and the USA politicians ever since 1913.
if we throw the Palestinians out sirs, the jews can have plenty of space to live and homes and things..the Palestinians can travel to Turkey..AIPAC, I gave them 10 dollars this year sirs..
Yeah like they are going to strave without your tenna. The shit has hit the fan mate,100+ years of lies and stupid movies, and mob crime, a all country ruined, the dollar in May 2009 will be worth the same as the Deutche Mark in 1933, you know the rest. AIPAc has turned the dream into a nightmare, my guess is that you better start packing. Now you have a good reason to make lebensraum around Israel, cause once depression hits well the US will look for an escape goat...2 can play that game...
Yeah, when it comes to throwing people out of homes, NOBODY BEATS America and the WHITE POWER STRUCTURE!
FROM DISPLACING AND EXTERMINATED NATIVES TO EVICTING FARMERS AND TENANTS IN THE 30S AND NOW ONCE AGAIN SEVENTY YEARS LATER. ALL TO UPHOLD THE FAILED IDEOLOGY OF FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.
There's nothing "hard" about the right whatsoever. They're a bunch of cowardly chicken hawks talking tough while they hide behind their security goons and bulletproof glass.
neoconservatives took over the right wing deal with it, or sit here and continue to stick your head under the sand about it. Or do something about it if you're a conservative. I'm not a conservative so I can care less about the right wing and what goes on internally.
not really. the american definition of liberal is nothing like the neocons. The neocons are more fascist, and are for more corporate control over society at the same rate will use the gov't for corporations to make more profits. That is fascism, and fascism is ultra conservative.
Neocons are ex-leftists, ex-Trotskyists, and support broader policies such as: interventionism, big government, fiat currency, and central economic planning.
Oops, accidentally hit the spam button on your reply... sorry.
Anyway, I think I was agreeing with you. Neo-cons share a lot of the same policy stances as liberals of the last 90 years or so (since Wilson), i.e. big government, central economic planning.
Everyone's conception of the political spectrum seems to be different, as everyone's understanding of what left and right are in a historical context varies.
I prefer to dispense with the labels and just compare policies and their advocates.
my argument is full of holes? how so? YOu don't know what the definition of fascism is. Fascism is a form of corporatism. In which corporations take control and have influence over gov't. Hitler was able to do with through his political party the NAzi's, but not every fascist regime has to have a swazitka, and has to be nazi. The current trend of deregulation in America is starting to resemble a lot of things in nazi germany. WAtch there will be less competition in all industries.
I totally agree with you. The idea that a Nazi cannot swaddle himself in the Star, Spangled banner, or put on a yarmulke and salute an Israeli flag is to be locked in the cognitive dissonance of the easily led and the pathetically ignorant.
Being a Nazi does not necessarily mean dedicating oneself to Hitler overtly. It is a mindset that sees itself as superior enough to demonize, torment and kill anyone that steps in the way of a national goal.
This has been flagged as spam show
.
ONE-STATE SOLUTION = All people's fall under same rule of law, same rights, same land, same borders. -- IT WON'T WORK = Israel wants a "Jewish State". Arab birthrates are up and Jewish birthrates are down. Jews would eventually be the MINORITY in Israel. = NO ONE-STATE
.
.
TWO-STATE = Israel is occupying the West Bank, (Palestinian State).
.
Israeli occupation and settlement infrastructure of "Jewish Only" highways and cities take up the land. = NO TWO-STATE.
.
Israeli crime/ madness!
.
SunnySide247 8 months ago
the jewish spy Jonathan Pollard advised the USA government never to allow any jews access to secured files because their first loyalty would always be to Communism and Zionism. The AIPAC spies Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman were allowed to skate free because the jews have enjoyed total control over the USA dollar and the USA politicians ever since 1913.
purleses 1 year ago
we can get those shyster out there steal more shekels from the stupid fed
sirus10 2 years ago
these are the same whackos that thought voting for W would bring the end of the world that they pray for.
sage0857 2 years ago
if we throw the Palestinians out sirs, the jews can have plenty of space to live and homes and things..the Palestinians can travel to Turkey..AIPAC, I gave them 10 dollars this year sirs..
johnsmdm 3 years ago
Yeah like they are going to strave without your tenna. The shit has hit the fan mate,100+ years of lies and stupid movies, and mob crime, a all country ruined, the dollar in May 2009 will be worth the same as the Deutche Mark in 1933, you know the rest. AIPAc has turned the dream into a nightmare, my guess is that you better start packing. Now you have a good reason to make lebensraum around Israel, cause once depression hits well the US will look for an escape goat...2 can play that game...
bewaver 3 years ago
Yeah, when it comes to throwing people out of homes, NOBODY BEATS America and the WHITE POWER STRUCTURE!
FROM DISPLACING AND EXTERMINATED NATIVES TO EVICTING FARMERS AND TENANTS IN THE 30S AND NOW ONCE AGAIN SEVENTY YEARS LATER. ALL TO UPHOLD THE FAILED IDEOLOGY OF FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.
AntiZionistCIAShill 2 years ago
There's nothing "hard" about the right whatsoever. They're a bunch of cowardly chicken hawks talking tough while they hide behind their security goons and bulletproof glass.
MuslimGhost 3 years ago 8
MuslimGhost - Theyre only "hard right" to the hard left.
LawrenceErnie 3 years ago
AIPAC has TOO MUCH influence in directing U.S. foreign policy.
reprehensor 3 years ago 11
Very interesting to hear the background to the Zionist/Christian Right merger. And also Carter's minor role in such...which he clearly regrets now.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
what do you even mean "right wing"? please explain.
neoconsevatives are not conservative and like big government, high tax and the welfare state.
please stop this right/left rubbish
greenbean1984 3 years ago 4
neoconservatives took over the right wing deal with it, or sit here and continue to stick your head under the sand about it. Or do something about it if you're a conservative. I'm not a conservative so I can care less about the right wing and what goes on internally.
lordblazer 3 years ago
neoconservatives control both major parties. Oh... news flash!
immanent 3 years ago 3
Neocons arent "far right" on anything except Israeli policy. Otherwise, they're moderates to liberals.
LawrenceErnie 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
PumaPumaPride 3 years ago
not really. the american definition of liberal is nothing like the neocons. The neocons are more fascist, and are for more corporate control over society at the same rate will use the gov't for corporations to make more profits. That is fascism, and fascism is ultra conservative.
lordblazer 3 years ago 3
Neocons are ex-leftists, ex-Trotskyists, and support broader policies such as: interventionism, big government, fiat currency, and central economic planning.
immanent 3 years ago
immanent - central economic planning and big government are leftist ideas. I rest my case.
LawrenceErnie 3 years ago
Hitler was a fascist and a committed anti-capitalist. Your argument is full of holes.
LawrenceErnie 3 years ago
Oops, accidentally hit the spam button on your reply... sorry.
Anyway, I think I was agreeing with you. Neo-cons share a lot of the same policy stances as liberals of the last 90 years or so (since Wilson), i.e. big government, central economic planning.
Everyone's conception of the political spectrum seems to be different, as everyone's understanding of what left and right are in a historical context varies.
I prefer to dispense with the labels and just compare policies and their advocates.
immanent 3 years ago
my argument is full of holes? how so? YOu don't know what the definition of fascism is. Fascism is a form of corporatism. In which corporations take control and have influence over gov't. Hitler was able to do with through his political party the NAzi's, but not every fascist regime has to have a swazitka, and has to be nazi. The current trend of deregulation in America is starting to resemble a lot of things in nazi germany. WAtch there will be less competition in all industries.
lordblazer 3 years ago
I totally agree with you. The idea that a Nazi cannot swaddle himself in the Star, Spangled banner, or put on a yarmulke and salute an Israeli flag is to be locked in the cognitive dissonance of the easily led and the pathetically ignorant.
Being a Nazi does not necessarily mean dedicating oneself to Hitler overtly. It is a mindset that sees itself as superior enough to demonize, torment and kill anyone that steps in the way of a national goal.
distressed7 2 years ago
US policy as it affects Israel is pretty much their only concern
oldjoe5 3 years ago