WW2 Tanks vs. Off-Road cars in snows of Siberia

[yomama629]

So thanks to RT, we discover vehicles running on tracks are more effective off-road than 4x4's. Why do you think tanks have tracks and not wheels in the first place?

[8900609]

haha old tanks should be used as thick snow transport know a days!

[stickmanpwner64]

Dear santa...

[NewsCry]

Mattracks ,use these and leave tanks in a snow drift

[PesarTarofi]

The tanks don't cost more?

[SamPD2]

@PesarTarofi Well, I believe these tanks are cheap, which was their design.

Cheap with quality basicly.

[aSuperbadassninja]

and the T-34 still kicks ass

[INSANESUICIDE]

@aSuperbadassninja but they never stood a chance against the tiger:)

[IKEELYOUNOW]

@INSANESUICIDE at least not individually, but that was hardly a problem considering they attacked in quite litterally thousands at a time.

[INSANESUICIDE]

@IKEELYOUNOW that is the most ridiculous statement i have ever heard, never once during world war two was there ever a charge of that many tanks, not even close.

that statement is so utterly ridiculous that i flat out refuse to discuss another word with you.

read Antony Beevor's book stalingrad you can read about the german leutenaint Hirschman who single handedly took out 15 T-34 tanks with a flak cannon.

the sheer stupidity of your statement provokes me into unspeakable rage!

[IKEELYOUNOW]

@INSANESUICIDE kursk dude. battle of kursk.

[INSANESUICIDE]

@IKEELYOUNOW I've read mostly any book readily available to the public about WWII and there were never ever thousands of tanks, russia wasn't capable of creating and fielding that many tanks after all the losses they took during the war.

also have you any idea of the logistics required to keep that many tanks running? there were severe fuel and ammo shortages and russias biggest problem was logistics to keep things running.

You really need to get your facts straight and stop reading propaganda

[IKEELYOUNOW]

@INSANESUICIDE umm dude, what are you talking about. there were 84,000 produced ever(not just during WW2, as in until 1958) and most of those were produced during WW2. The T-34 is one of the tanks that, like the sherman, were famous for having thousands builts and used during WW2. methinks you are making things up to sound intelligent? in the battle of kursk alone the russians had over 5000 tanks. also, there are multiple thousands of books available. u didnt read them all.

[rchave]

@IKEELYOUNOW

I think he has read them all. There aren't thousands of books available on WW2, have you any idea of the production issues and man hours to keep so many published? You're reading too much bookshop propaganda.

[starlionblue]

This is so hilarious. All that money spent on that fancy SUV and a tank replica can still outperform it!

[KMAMK123]

WWII at that!

[HITLERSBERLINSANDPIT]

in england you could buy old tanks at auctions with armament deactivated at one time

[mortality1987]

ich will auch =)

[bohemianh]

send my a tiger!

[BusterXXXL]

You wouldnt want one for a race. They were really slow.

[fightforfair]

Drive Tank send kids to school Wow!

[rocketshipstud2]

what tank engines does he use?...

[rocketshipstud2]

one of german marked ones seems to be a mockup of a chech lt-38... or in wehrmacht use a pzkpfw 38...is one a russian t-32...?

[rocketshipstud2]

yes! yes! the t-34/76 is going to have far more traction and weight on its treads!...tanks can handle deep snow unless their motor oil freezes...you can't let wet mud freeze solid in your tracks and road wheels overnight...tank must be kept clean...

[itschris1821]

lmao

[mokdadmm]

Funny owning a tank as a vehicle!

[LibertaerUeberAlles]

Neighbors would become nervous :-)

[TheHorsenation]

LOL. Russians playing with German Wehrmacht tanks :)

[UKMonarchist]

i want one lol