1971, that was the time India had to take over the present Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, get the Balochi their Balochistan, Pashtun their Pashtunistan or join Afghanistan, if the Sindh people wanted Sindhunistan so be it or join India, take over present state of Punjab in Pakistan,it sounds impossible; but today that's what the west is trying to achieve.
If India had the support of the west in 1971, it would have been possible, Well today west knows the pain called Pakistan,welcome aboard WEST
any war slows down ur economic progress. Indians should never think of pakis any more. they are already in a much higher league. Please start thinking of much bigger place in the world. Pakistan is already suffering, and needs peace too. Lets forget about pakistan for a while.
ha ha..i too agree,,thats y pak army got defeated in 1965,1971,kargil war,brasstach operation,{details n wikipedia},and finally few months back usa picked ladan from ur military pre-minces..
but u put nice video here..go on with this effort..you may get best documentary award..best of luck
ha ha..i too agree,,thats y pak army got defeated in 1965,1971,kargil war,brasstach operation,{details n wikipedia},and finally few months back usa picked ladan from ur military pre-minces..
but u put nice video here..go on with this effort..you may get best documentary award..best of luck
Never wish for another war bro, pray for peace war will slow down our economic progress, our nation needs to get better and better. Pakistan is meant to be a deeper and deeper shit hole, they will soon have their army ruling them.. but our pesace doesn't mean that we will be any peaceful at war, pakis will see hell if they think of crossing our border.
@Pakizzzz1 maybe u forgot if india has poor people they are much richer den ur american aid which u normally use for the isi trying to fight gurriela warfare in india and hide people like osama bin ladin ttrust me india us and uk should invade pakistan and they should do the same thing wht allied forces did to germany during ww2
@Pakizzzz1 We may have beggars in our country...but YOur entire country is a beggar state! you people beg for money from everyone! saudis chinese americans....
@depp8444 you pathetic shit, you yourself call your people beggars. let me add a few more adjectives like terrorists, fundamentalists, supressors of women and children, and most important, chutias. get the fuck out an all india site you dumbass biiitch
@bjornsiborgsi Why don't you read my comment again With your head out of your ass and try to understand what i wrote... :)....I'm indian if you haven't guessed already :)
abe o....@Pakizzzz1...It's well known around the world that who got victrious in 1965, 1971 and Kargil war...aur hamne tere 95,000 porkis chuho ko zinda hi surrender karne par mazboor kar diya tha..don't you know? Indian brave soldiers ne Lahore tak pe kabza kar liya tha. Haven't u seen the footage of Pak army surrendrs to Indian army...?..aur sun kabhi "A Indian" use mat kariyo, English grammatical ke hisab se ye "An Indian" hota hai..ha ha ha ha LOL....a truly Indian....Jai Hind
@Pakizzzz1 bahan ke laude.....bas bolna jante ho ...agar thoda kaam karna bhi jante...to USA ke samne bheekh magne ki jarurat nahi padti....aur madarchodon par bolna bhi nahi aata bhokhna aata hai....aabki hum nahi marenge tum logo ko ...pinzre mein daal denge ...kyonki kutton ko marna hamare desh mein allow nahi...you know animal protection
@Pakizzzz1 india is not a country only with hindus but ur HINDU india theory is completey underestimated becoz india has more muslims den urs though i am hindu i respect muslims but they are only disrespected by assholes like u and it is litrelly bullshit in 48 india pakistan were intervened by the UN on 31st december 1948 so it was stalemate indians were able to reach Lahore in 1965 but ur herores defended it so they deserve respect but it was indian victory! Indian army has HQ in kargil
1965 - A Glorious Victory of Pak - IAF lost 119 fighter jet, While PAF lost just 3. COMPLETE AIR VICTORY.
1971 - A Victory of Bangali Muslims, IAF lost 108 fighter jet, While PAF lost 28.
Kargil - 1000 Pakiz Vs 7,00000 Indian army. Pak Captured Kargil. India lost 6,000 soldiers, Pak lost 357. But Coz of USA, Pakiz let Indian to go. IAF lost 3 Mig & 1 H-Copter, While PAF lost 0.
you r right sikhs fighting for india previous 1000 years. and during migration for india or pakistan they r burn and kill many families it was a good job they r doin for india.
but what was awsome matter when indian army spoil sikhs golden temple most sacred temple for sikhs. where was justice.
Apparently, you have gained little experience on counter terrorism?! Your statement proves your naivety. I hope General Patreus did not have people like you in his council, otherwise NATO body counts would have been far worse and the dead afghan civilians. And please do read your constitutionto understand the term " Treason" and how is it defined for foreign spies and combatant. And Pls watch Hollywood war films(40's). Please do not show your ginormous ignorance without logic!
@wavinglight Dude. next time read the comments before throwing together words. It was 2 tours not hours, but that should be common sense. With that, logic in your lil skull will normally automatically follow. And PLEASE dont tell someone who has been in combat to learn about combat from movies. Grow common sense, before asking someone to show "logic". You are clearly showing yourself as either a teenager or an adult who spends too much time behind desks.
@KOGR11 Allow me to educate you, First, any "act of self defense" is not murder, it's more apt during war when somebody shoots @ you and you fire back. Second, you should watch Hollywood movies (40s) to learn about the fervent patriotic zeal and fervor of the US "Civilian" movie directors back in the days; third, given your choice of words, your claim to be an US army veteran seems kinda dubious. I know a lot of marines who possess a real tactical insight none sounded like You.
@wavinglight Allow me to educate you, First, the scene depicted in the movie is not an act of self defence, when the soldier was shooting the case of self defence was already defunct, this was farther made clear when the soldier went ahead and showed his zeal in mutilating the body of his victim, thats pure director's zeal covering for unprofessionalism. Second, I am NOT from the US, US was not the only NATO state involved in Afghanistan-- thats the second time you assumed something wrong.
@KOGR11 Now let me conjecture something behind this futile dialouge.. (1)you have never been in combat, (2) you are not familiar with rules of conduct in warzones for a soldier (3)you are indian, quite possinly from west bengal living in the US. (4) The whole reason you expect me to hold a dialouge with you on youtube is your insatiable jingoism for india, because you find it unbearable to have the best efforts made on a war movie made in bollywood, criticized on lack of sensibility.
@KOGR11 This is getting tedious, I haven't had this easy sonce the college level debates competition. You have failed to comprehend single fact so far. First, you coudl not refute the fact that the man killed is a spy therefore shoud be charged wiht treason; second, he fired on the Indin soldier first promting the apprriate realiation from Indian side, making it an act of self -defense;
Hold up.. you thought this was a debate? you think people have debates on youtube that are taken seriously by professionals? and you think I give a rat's ass about your college life debate club experience? Get a life, you started this by expecting me to correspond with you over a comment made 2 years ago. You did all these to prove a case of self defence in a movie scene? This is the last group of messages you will receieve, because I seriously dont have time for your childish jingoism.
@KOGR11 This is getting tedious; I haven't had this easy since the college level debates competition. You have failed to comprehend single fact so far. First, you could not refute the fact that the man killed is a spy therefore should be charged with treason; second, he fired on the Indian soldier first prompting the appropriate retaliation from Indian side, making it an act of self -defense;
@KOGR11 Third, you experience (in combat or lack thereof) does not exclude the possibility of you being a buffoon, otherwise every soldier could automatically qualify to be a general! Forth, there is no need for me to check which country you belong to, because I have effectively destroyed your logic though out the discussion thread. If you want to go around sniffing my butt, do so in your free time (thus prove yourself to be an undercover racist).
your second point would be refuted easily by just watching the scene and the circumstances portrayed therein. Obviously the soldier was unharmed and the moment the civilian started running he already was a non combatant and had to be apprehended rather than shot. Making a case for self defence there is not only superficial it also shows whoever makes the case to be a complete buffoon who is not at all aware of the rules of conduct for a soldier in combat espcially regarding civilians.
Third: You dont have to be a general to understand appropriation of conducts for a soldier, you can be anyone from rank and file. It will be less political and more in praxis that way too. I am finidng it rediculous that I am even responding to your feeble "arguments" devoid of understanding of the subject matter not withstanding the fact that you are in fact discussing a movie scene from a 'war movie" and calling an ex soldier as incompetent in his profession.. thats silly if anything.
@KOGR11 Lastly, next time if you decide to debate an issue, complete your education first. I have left some “Oxford tested” mistakes in the previous post, start with them.
@wavinglight First, There was no increminating evidence that showed the civilian to be a traitor other than what the soldier heard, and if the civilian WAS found to be aiding the enemy then the soldier's first duty is to bring the civilian to justice not apply firing squad rules on a civilian who is obviously fleeing from him instead of putting up a continued resistance the soldier's mentality was clearly shown when he went farther and mutilated the corpse. The whole scene was simplylaughable.
@wavinglight lastly.. racist? "indian" is a race?.. If I am not too mistaken both of us actually come from the exact same "race" at least genetically speaking, if we really have to count on the word "race" as valid at all.. perhaps it would have done you well in your college life to pay attention to what your "opponent" was actually saying during debate club debates, because the word "jingosim" should have given you some hints to what was being to referred to. Please go back to college.
@KOGR11 Racist can be people who are religious fundamentalist or tribal bigots. Indian subcontinent has both types. Again, follow the logic, if you are being shot at, you shot back that is all that there is. I am reluctant to clarify but you've utterly missed it. Ex-soldier (apparently served under NATO) with a bias for Pakistani failed state, things are getting fishy. You can even claim to be Ex special force decorated veteran who knows, it is youtube right? :D
@supergenration Sorry but the truth is you can not even tackle Israel, a country with just a few mile deep territory for 60 years; how would you tackle India a country with 2000 mile long frontier. Meantime, prepare for Independent Baluchistan and liberated Pastunistan (NWFP), provided you have adequate knowledge of your country. Khuda hafis, brother. Jai Hind.
@Bengal4life1 gaand maarun teri bengali __apni aukaad se upar walon se soch ke baat kiya kar nahi to aisa phadunga ki tere chithron se teri maan apni gand saaf karegi !!!!!!!!
@Ayaankhanna23 Is this what Quraan teaches you? Act like a savage that you are, just remember your country now licking the arsehoel of US Army and their drones are picking up your people like cherries, and Pakistan is now becoming the mistress of China. Tackle your country first brother before calling people names. 3 Nobel prizes from Bengali people alone; what have you? AK-47 and stinger missile ? And raping and killing innocent women; is that your culture? Pardon my rudeness.
I explained you earlier..........Let me explain again ........Hitler captured starlinGuard from Russia In 1941,Russia commander was ordered to surrender his men n him self to Nazi's.What did it mean.Did Russia lost the whole war...Did whole Russia surrendered?Listen Pal Pakistanis surrendered just a western battlefield......Indian couldn't dare to attack on eastern fronts....these are the facts.......And if you teach wrong history to you generations it will effect india's future.
Abay lund k siron indianon....hahaa. 1971 war was lost by Pakistan at only one post that is Bangladesh.....what about other post.Azad Kashmir,punjab...sindh,rajhistan etc...read the history...See united nation documents....It was not called surrendered or defeat....If it was ,it must be somthing like surrendered of japan or germany ,,,..please i am not defending pakistan ...You have internet search your self...and one more thing...what about the helped of mukhti bahini...
PAKISTAN RAPED GHANDI IN 1947 AND 1965 WE GAVE BANGLADESH INDEPENDENCE IN 1971 IN 1999 THE TALIBAN AND KASHMIRI MUJAHEDDIN TOOK ON THE WHOLE OF INDIAN MILITARY IN THEN 26/11 PETTY THREATS AGIANST PAKISTAN BUT NO SURGICAL STRIKE WIKI LEAKS INDIAS IS A PUSSY AND IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN HAAHAHAHAHAHAH
PAKISTAN RAPED GHANDI IN 1947 AND 1965 WE GAVE BANGLADESH INDEPENDENCE IN 1971 IN 1999 THE TALIBAN AND KASHMIRI MUJAHEDDIN TOOK ON THE WHOLE OF INDIAN MILITARY IN THEN 26/11 PETTY THREATS AGIANST PAKISTAN BUT NO SURGICAL STRIKE WIKI LEAKS INDIAS IS A PUSSY AND IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN HAAHAHAHAHAHAH
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE u guys gave Pakistan Indipendent? and then u guys gave 90 thousand prisoners of wars?..LOL>..how about lonngewala?. did u guy purposely loose to 100 something indian soldiers?...LOL..u must be!
@muhammadsucksmycock1 the same way china captured 61.000 indian pows the same way pakistan has captured 55.000 indian pows how are still in paki prisons no dig up your dead mothers grave and skull fuck the whore ur sister gets fucked by pakis every day gaynesh cock sucker tutueh raam sita hanumaan lon teh bajjj
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE so Hindu Indian soliders fucked 90,000 muslims Porkistani soliders and in process gave Bangladesh its freedom....how sweet..LOL...your fat allah and prostitute Muhammad must be crying in hell?!....LOL...i bet!...Insha fucking allah.....
@muhammadsucksmycock1 how many soldiers did your dead mother suck before she choked on paki cum wen u give birth to some daughters i will be the first wen to fuck them yeh in the fanny small tits better
@SuperKnightranger Who have 500 soldiers? You? Huh! I tell you the truth.
In east Pakistan, we have only one squadron at dhaka airbase infact not a complete squadron but having 10 F-86 sabres. On the other hand, india had 10 squadrons means 180 aircrafts including hunters,migs. So shame on you that how shamlessly you have made riots in east pakistan, create mukti bahini and then shamlessly entered in our sacred land. Just shut up okkkk.
@ThePakistaniMuslim i did nt talk about bagladesh i m talking about 1971 war u stupid nd by the way east pakistan has nothing but now its bangladesh u dumb fellow
Hope steven Spielberg takes on directing our war movies...Indo pak war stuff will really rock the movie world...that is IF produced and directed properly...
India could become the world's third largest economy by purchasing power parity, overtaking Japan in 2012. India is also expected to grow faster than China after 2020," a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers said.
Where do you get these facts boys? In Kargil war your soldiers were being killed like rats by only 700 Mujahids and they held off your whole division. If it wasnt for our traitor political leaders Kashmir was ours for the taking. Dont rush things guys... after all... we will take over India very soon. Lets see what you do when we are face to face!
face to face will be the real war but india and the whole world knows that pakistan will blackmail india and the world to use nuclear weapons once india will control your army which is famous in surrendering. i think u forget 1971 when your arms were cut while sleeping and a cartoon called zaid hamid is giving you lecture to get off from your sleep. if this was the case then your army should not be killing taliban in your own territory.
forgot to mention 500000 indian cowards + 250000 mukti bhani's terrorists against 45000 Pak Army Jawans... with supply routs sealed off and outnumbering Pakistan in all departments by atleast 10:1 ratio the indians became lions... LOL!
@PWFI Hey u dumb ass... u all pak ppl & gov r wasting every ones time, money and energy by supporting terrorism... pak is always against ind n want to defeat ind but we want to defeat terrorism and who supports them... but u dumb ass will never understand..
@ketya4u Pakistann never wanted to fight with india but if india pangay lay ga to defence hamara right hai so ager us defence mai tm logo ko defeat hoti hai to phr rona nahi chiay.
hahah, its funny reading all the comments made by people without citing any references. How about go on wikipedia and see what the neutral sources have to say and yes references have been provided.
Abe Gaaandooo tere 90000 baaapon ki chudaai ki thi Indian army ne. bhool gaya shaayad. Katora le ke har doosre din pahunch jaate bheek maangne. Saalon kuch to sharam karo. Saale khairaat par jo internet chal raha hai woh bhi band ho jaayega. India in not developed country so the unicef figures are correct. Gaandu kuch to apana bana log. Movie bhi Indian dekthe ho :D
Muslim Umah is certainly one. But there is difference between Ummah and rulers of muslim world.
As far as talibans r concerned, these talibans in FATA qill b finshed in next 2 to 3 yrs as soon as US leave afganistan. And u better care of Naxal and their Red Corridor. U will enjoy fot having fun from Naxals.
Why don't you say Saudi's consider other muslims inferior. :D. Don't worry about the red corridor. We won't use heavy artillary or US help to contain them . All the best for next 2-3 years :D
@PWFI--search for "Squadron Leader Alam of the Pakistan Air Farce" for the truth abt the fagot/braggart Alam.....his exploits are as truthful as the story of buraq and stupid mo
sllay jahan kay, first learn to writte farce=/=force, i think you were educated in gandoostan national university, hahahha, Evryone know the reality about GAF=gandoostan air force,5 time biggest then PAF, but PAF get air superioty in 24H hahah
nah we know that PAF=Pakistan Air Farce....not force....btw....it takes some intelligence to understand sarcasm...hence impossible for a paki to understand sarcasm
lol,it's why we can't understan what does mean Shinning gandoostan,right??? more than 40 millions prostituted womans and childrens...more than 300 millions gandoostan sleep in street.....hahhaha
and considering the fact that the same people...the people who sleep on streets...have cut pak in half?
if you say that we are sub-par....it simply implys that you pakis are so pathetic that you were defeated by those very sub-par human beings....see...you cant even win a simple argument...much less a war
LOL, really idiot,Jab gand mein dum nahi tha tauo East pakistan mein Terroriste ko help kar kay pakistan ko taurnay ki sajach kar di, kyon kay 1965 we have give a very nice lesson,But now it's different we don't need to fight against gandoostan becauze in your own country evrybody want indepandance becauze you hindu are incapable to gov,anybody, only in 62 years millions of innocent people were killed, but look our muslim histoiry if have force you to convert to islam today no one will be hindu
too much hot air from a bunch of muslims whose primary livelyhood is defined as "licking american boots".....btw..paki muslims havnt dropped from arabia...but hindus converted at the arab knife point.....but u still celebrate the fact that their male ancestors were killed and female were raped....cheap bastards.
1965.....read some neutral history book...not fagot paki textbooks...atleast read the dawn news paper....afterall its established by the fagot jinnah
hahhaha, you havn't got any arguments it's why you are changing the subject idiot fagot gandu, if muslim have converts all hindu wiht knife point ,today no one in gandoostan will be a hindu;we have ruled you over 1000 years. You can won a war only in bollywod film,it's realty!
"you havn't got any arguments it's why you are changing the subject"--took you 5 days to respond...its obvious who is out of arguments
"if muslim have converts all hindu wiht knife point ,today no one in gandoostan will be a hindu"--that's precisely what auranzeb tried...he led his empire to disintegration trying to subdue a much smaller hindu kingdom...after 25 years of futile war and pyrrhic victories, he died lonely, sorry and without any strong heirs.
"we have ruled you over 1000 years"--it would be true only if you are an afghan of mongol origin....but i believe you are a punjabi...who was defeated and subdued...btw, why all the paki missiles are named after afghan war lords??!!...unless your women are raped by them??
"You can won a war only in bollywod film"--so, your text books teach that bangladesh exists only in bollywood movies?...as usual, you are pathetic!!
lol,no punjabi,no sindi, no pathan........but the only thing is we are muslim, you want to disinform me, hahah, i know all of our missiles have muslim name, . So about bangladesh, in 1965 we have kick you very bad, gandoostan was rape very badly by pak army, so 1971 you knew if you attack directly pakistan the result will be same to 1965, it's why you have use first Terroristes "KUKHTAR BANNI"
S.M. Burke writes — After the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 the balance of military power had decisively shifted in favor of India. Pakistan had found it difficult to replace the heavy equipment lost during that conflict while her adversary, despite her economic and political problems, had been determinedly building up her strength.
Rasul Bux Rais, a Pakistani political analyst wrote--The 1965 war with India proved that Pakistan could neither break the formidable Indian defenses in a blitzkrieg fashion nor could she sustain an all-out conflict for long.
proof--"India won the war. It gained 1,840 square kilometers of Pakistani territory: 640 square kilometers in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 square kilometers of the Sailkot sector; 380 square kilometers far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 square kilometers on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 square kilometers of Indian territory: 490 square kilometers in the Chhamb sector and 50 square kilometers arounf Khem Karan."
Several Pakistani writers criticized the military's ill-founded belief that their "martial race" of soldiers could defeat "Hindu India" in the war
the myth of racial superiority was largely disproved in 1965 when despite having more sophisticated equipment, numerical preponderance in tanks and the element of surprise the Pakistan Armoured Division miserably failed at Khem Karn
@Moebab I can answer that... well killings by Pakistan army are still not proved even after 40 years of investigation and dont say that Pakistan tried to stop that because Pakistani influence had long been finished. And by the way in 71 you proved that you have no respect for international borders and in kargil you you said that Pakistan had voilated the line of control (that is much less stable and can be changed any time) its all so funny.....
@Moebab pakis are ruthless they dont care for anyone they ill and go on killing and on and on they should be finished and thats what is happening now bomblast everyday
@KOGR11 A civilian ? really ?! A civilian performing acts of treason, firing upon a regular officer during time of war ...do you even study law or know the standard constitution of whichever country you live in, even Southern Sudan included. Please be little more responsive.
@wavinglight Yes a civilian, the soldier in the scene was fully capable of apprehending the informer without killing him, the absurdity of the scene aside. I dont have to study law OR know my country's constitution a to z, however my common sense from serving in afghanistan on two tours is quite enough to tell me, which scenes in a movie are simply absurdities invented by an over zealous civilian movie director. Please dont insult yourself by asking people to respond to a 2 year old comment.
This has been flagged as spam show
1971, that was the time India had to take over the present Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, get the Balochi their Balochistan, Pashtun their Pashtunistan or join Afghanistan, if the Sindh people wanted Sindhunistan so be it or join India, take over present state of Punjab in Pakistan,it sounds impossible; but today that's what the west is trying to achieve.
If India had the support of the west in 1971, it would have been possible, Well today west knows the pain called Pakistan,welcome aboard WEST
deals0 1 week ago
hi bitch indian if you want fight with us come on why no want fight because hindu sacred sacred
sacred sacred and we just say allah o akbar we still waiting for fight and then we will see
MazharPakChina786 2 weeks ago
any war slows down ur economic progress. Indians should never think of pakis any more. they are already in a much higher league. Please start thinking of much bigger place in the world. Pakistan is already suffering, and needs peace too. Lets forget about pakistan for a while.
ginu1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ha ha..i too agree,,thats y pak army got defeated in 1965,1971,kargil war,brasstach operation,{details n wikipedia},and finally few months back usa picked ladan from ur military pre-minces..
but u put nice video here..go on with this effort..you may get best documentary award..best of luck
MrNutrino 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ha ha..i too agree,,thats y pak army got defeated in 1965,1971,kargil war,brasstach operation,{details n wikipedia},and finally few months back usa picked ladan from ur military pre-minces..
but u put nice video here..go on with this effort..you may get best documentary award..best of luck
MrNutrino 1 month ago
Never wish for another war bro, pray for peace war will slow down our economic progress, our nation needs to get better and better. Pakistan is meant to be a deeper and deeper shit hole, they will soon have their army ruling them.. but our pesace doesn't mean that we will be any peaceful at war, pakis will see hell if they think of crossing our border.
arunkittu047 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUK U INDIANS
gooduH786 2 months ago
wow.........
navi2gaur 2 months ago
INDIAN$=#OLLY $#IT
scorpionking426 2 months ago
MOTHER FUCKER$ INDIANS
scorpionking426 2 months ago
@scorpionking426 gand jal gai randi bhadwe, heera mandi ki paidaish bhosadi ke
gauravzerogravity 2 months ago
Proud of my Punjab brothers...Jai Hind..
MrJosepharcher 2 months ago
PORNISTAN was officially raped in 1971
I wish another war starts wid those PORN addicts, and we will remove this SHIT from the global map
ilovecivilengg 3 months ago 22
@ilovecivilengg it was raped so badly that it split into two. LoL
DrRajReddy 1 month ago 2
@ilovecivilengg fuck its will never possible
wahablondon11 3 days ago
INDIA STILL HAS THE WORLDS LARGEST NUMBER OF POOR PEOPLE IN A SINGLE COUNTRY.
Pakizzzz1 3 months ago
@Pakizzzz1 maybe u forgot if india has poor people they are much richer den ur american aid which u normally use for the isi trying to fight gurriela warfare in india and hide people like osama bin ladin ttrust me india us and uk should invade pakistan and they should do the same thing wht allied forces did to germany during ww2
Shanmukhthegreat 2 months ago
@Pakizzzz1 Thats because india is 2nd largset country in the world population wise...Don'T they teach math your madrassas?
depp8444 2 months ago
@Pakizzzz1 We may have beggars in our country...but YOur entire country is a beggar state! you people beg for money from everyone! saudis chinese americans....
depp8444 2 months ago 12
@depp8444 you pathetic shit, you yourself call your people beggars. let me add a few more adjectives like terrorists, fundamentalists, supressors of women and children, and most important, chutias. get the fuck out an all india site you dumbass biiitch
bjornsiborgsi 1 month ago
@bjornsiborgsi Why don't you read my comment again With your head out of your ass and try to understand what i wrote... :)....I'm indian if you haven't guessed already :)
depp8444 1 month ago
abe o....@Pakizzzz1...It's well known around the world that who got victrious in 1965, 1971 and Kargil war...aur hamne tere 95,000 porkis chuho ko zinda hi surrender karne par mazboor kar diya tha..don't you know? Indian brave soldiers ne Lahore tak pe kabza kar liya tha. Haven't u seen the footage of Pak army surrendrs to Indian army...?..aur sun kabhi "A Indian" use mat kariyo, English grammatical ke hisab se ye "An Indian" hota hai..ha ha ha ha LOL....a truly Indian....Jai Hind
Manimsk 3 months ago
Hindu Indian can win only in Wikipedia… A Indian Fake Web Site….
wikipedia a indian fake website. hahaha..
90% of world internet user are not going to accept the information of this Indian fake web site.
I know indian wrote their fake history on this fake website. wikipedia. ..... Lozersss
Pakistan defeated India in 48, 65, and in Kargil....
Pakizzzz1 5 months ago
@Pakizzzz1 bahan ke laude.....bas bolna jante ho ...agar thoda kaam karna bhi jante...to USA ke samne bheekh magne ki jarurat nahi padti....aur madarchodon par bolna bhi nahi aata bhokhna aata hai....aabki hum nahi marenge tum logo ko ...pinzre mein daal denge ...kyonki kutton ko marna hamare desh mein allow nahi...you know animal protection
yogi198418 4 months ago
@Pakizzzz1 india is not a country only with hindus but ur HINDU india theory is completey underestimated becoz india has more muslims den urs though i am hindu i respect muslims but they are only disrespected by assholes like u and it is litrelly bullshit in 48 india pakistan were intervened by the UN on 31st december 1948 so it was stalemate indians were able to reach Lahore in 1965 but ur herores defended it so they deserve respect but it was indian victory! Indian army has HQ in kargil
Shanmukhthegreat 2 months ago
1948 - Pakistan Got Kashmir Land. (AZAD KASHMIR)
1962 - China kick India ASS. Still Bleeding.
1965 - A Glorious Victory of Pak - IAF lost 119 fighter jet, While PAF lost just 3. COMPLETE AIR VICTORY.
1971 - A Victory of Bangali Muslims, IAF lost 108 fighter jet, While PAF lost 28.
Kargil - 1000 Pakiz Vs 7,00000 Indian army. Pak Captured Kargil. India lost 6,000 soldiers, Pak lost 357. But Coz of USA, Pakiz let Indian to go. IAF lost 3 Mig & 1 H-Copter, While PAF lost 0.
Pakizzzz1 5 months ago
you r right sikhs fighting for india previous 1000 years. and during migration for india or pakistan they r burn and kill many families it was a good job they r doin for india.
but what was awsome matter when indian army spoil sikhs golden temple most sacred temple for sikhs. where was justice.
aakhan21 5 months ago
Sikhs have been fighting for India since 1000 years..
sonuEEE 5 months ago
YEA RIGHT... This is a movie, which grossly exaggerated the truth!
poolla2007 5 months ago
Apparently, you have gained little experience on counter terrorism?! Your statement proves your naivety. I hope General Patreus did not have people like you in his council, otherwise NATO body counts would have been far worse and the dead afghan civilians. And please do read your constitutionto understand the term " Treason" and how is it defined for foreign spies and combatant. And Pls watch Hollywood war films(40's). Please do not show your ginormous ignorance without logic!
wavinglight 7 months ago
@wavinglight Dude. next time read the comments before throwing together words. It was 2 tours not hours, but that should be common sense. With that, logic in your lil skull will normally automatically follow. And PLEASE dont tell someone who has been in combat to learn about combat from movies. Grow common sense, before asking someone to show "logic". You are clearly showing yourself as either a teenager or an adult who spends too much time behind desks.
KOGR11 7 months ago
@KOGR11 Allow me to educate you, First, any "act of self defense" is not murder, it's more apt during war when somebody shoots @ you and you fire back. Second, you should watch Hollywood movies (40s) to learn about the fervent patriotic zeal and fervor of the US "Civilian" movie directors back in the days; third, given your choice of words, your claim to be an US army veteran seems kinda dubious. I know a lot of marines who possess a real tactical insight none sounded like You.
wavinglight 7 months ago
@wavinglight Allow me to educate you, First, the scene depicted in the movie is not an act of self defence, when the soldier was shooting the case of self defence was already defunct, this was farther made clear when the soldier went ahead and showed his zeal in mutilating the body of his victim, thats pure director's zeal covering for unprofessionalism. Second, I am NOT from the US, US was not the only NATO state involved in Afghanistan-- thats the second time you assumed something wrong.
KOGR11 7 months ago
@KOGR11 Now let me conjecture something behind this futile dialouge.. (1)you have never been in combat, (2) you are not familiar with rules of conduct in warzones for a soldier (3)you are indian, quite possinly from west bengal living in the US. (4) The whole reason you expect me to hold a dialouge with you on youtube is your insatiable jingoism for india, because you find it unbearable to have the best efforts made on a war movie made in bollywood, criticized on lack of sensibility.
KOGR11 7 months ago
@KOGR11 This is getting tedious, I haven't had this easy sonce the college level debates competition. You have failed to comprehend single fact so far. First, you coudl not refute the fact that the man killed is a spy therefore shoud be charged wiht treason; second, he fired on the Indin soldier first promting the apprriate realiation from Indian side, making it an act of self -defense;
wavinglight 7 months ago
Hold up.. you thought this was a debate? you think people have debates on youtube that are taken seriously by professionals? and you think I give a rat's ass about your college life debate club experience? Get a life, you started this by expecting me to correspond with you over a comment made 2 years ago. You did all these to prove a case of self defence in a movie scene? This is the last group of messages you will receieve, because I seriously dont have time for your childish jingoism.
KOGR11 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KOGR11 This is getting tedious; I haven't had this easy since the college level debates competition. You have failed to comprehend single fact so far. First, you could not refute the fact that the man killed is a spy therefore should be charged with treason; second, he fired on the Indian soldier first prompting the appropriate retaliation from Indian side, making it an act of self -defense;
wavinglight 7 months ago
@KOGR11 Third, you experience (in combat or lack thereof) does not exclude the possibility of you being a buffoon, otherwise every soldier could automatically qualify to be a general! Forth, there is no need for me to check which country you belong to, because I have effectively destroyed your logic though out the discussion thread. If you want to go around sniffing my butt, do so in your free time (thus prove yourself to be an undercover racist).
wavinglight 7 months ago
your second point would be refuted easily by just watching the scene and the circumstances portrayed therein. Obviously the soldier was unharmed and the moment the civilian started running he already was a non combatant and had to be apprehended rather than shot. Making a case for self defence there is not only superficial it also shows whoever makes the case to be a complete buffoon who is not at all aware of the rules of conduct for a soldier in combat espcially regarding civilians.
KOGR11 7 months ago
Third: You dont have to be a general to understand appropriation of conducts for a soldier, you can be anyone from rank and file. It will be less political and more in praxis that way too. I am finidng it rediculous that I am even responding to your feeble "arguments" devoid of understanding of the subject matter not withstanding the fact that you are in fact discussing a movie scene from a 'war movie" and calling an ex soldier as incompetent in his profession.. thats silly if anything.
KOGR11 7 months ago
@KOGR11 Lastly, next time if you decide to debate an issue, complete your education first. I have left some “Oxford tested” mistakes in the previous post, start with them.
wavinglight 7 months ago
@wavinglight First, There was no increminating evidence that showed the civilian to be a traitor other than what the soldier heard, and if the civilian WAS found to be aiding the enemy then the soldier's first duty is to bring the civilian to justice not apply firing squad rules on a civilian who is obviously fleeing from him instead of putting up a continued resistance the soldier's mentality was clearly shown when he went farther and mutilated the corpse. The whole scene was simplylaughable.
KOGR11 7 months ago
@wavinglight lastly.. racist? "indian" is a race?.. If I am not too mistaken both of us actually come from the exact same "race" at least genetically speaking, if we really have to count on the word "race" as valid at all.. perhaps it would have done you well in your college life to pay attention to what your "opponent" was actually saying during debate club debates, because the word "jingosim" should have given you some hints to what was being to referred to. Please go back to college.
KOGR11 7 months ago
Comment removed
wavinglight 7 months ago
@KOGR11 Racist can be people who are religious fundamentalist or tribal bigots. Indian subcontinent has both types. Again, follow the logic, if you are being shot at, you shot back that is all that there is. I am reluctant to clarify but you've utterly missed it. Ex-soldier (apparently served under NATO) with a bias for Pakistani failed state, things are getting fishy. You can even claim to be Ex special force decorated veteran who knows, it is youtube right? :D
wavinglight 7 months ago
Comment removed
wavinglight 7 months ago
sale nazayaz to tu hai younus hum to 5000 saal pehle bhi hindu the aur aaj bhi wahi hain
are gand mein dum to tere baap dadaon mein nahi tha jo mughlon ke laudon par nach nach kar tujh jaise kalankon ko chor gaye......
Ayaankhanna23 7 months ago
woooooo!!!! BEST EVR INDIAN WAR FLICK........SUNNY DEOL IZ AWESUM N MA INDIAN ARMY TOOOOO
aman11001 7 months ago
PAKISTAN DISLIKE THIS VIDEO BECAUSE IT IS FAKE. HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH.WHEN WE SEE THIS VIDEO WE LAUGH AT IT.
THATS WHY I ALWAYS SAY.
1-DUD INDIANS
2-SHAMELESS INDIANS
3-INDIAN DOGS SELDOM BITE.
4-GAY HIND
supergenration 8 months ago
@supergenration Sorry but the truth is you can not even tackle Israel, a country with just a few mile deep territory for 60 years; how would you tackle India a country with 2000 mile long frontier. Meantime, prepare for Independent Baluchistan and liberated Pastunistan (NWFP), provided you have adequate knowledge of your country. Khuda hafis, brother. Jai Hind.
wavinglight 7 months ago
indians i mean hindoes are sub ke sub mughlon ki najaiz aulad hein heheheheehehhehehehehhhhhhhhhhhhhehehhehehhehehhahahhahhhahahhahhahahaaaahhah
Younus786 8 months ago
yee sub kuch tumahrey baap russia ne kiyaa.abb agger tumhari gandi gaand mey dam hey too aajoe,tumhari maa koo naa choda too pakistan
Younus786 8 months ago
I didn't know Sunny deol fought in 1971.....
Bengal4life1 9 months ago
@Bengal4life1 gaand maarun teri bengali __apni aukaad se upar walon se soch ke baat kiya kar nahi to aisa phadunga ki tere chithron se teri maan apni gand saaf karegi !!!!!!!!
Ayaankhanna23 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ayaankhanna23 Gay father fucker!!!! ha ha
Bengal4life1 8 months ago
@Ayaankhanna23 Is this what Quraan teaches you? Act like a savage that you are, just remember your country now licking the arsehoel of US Army and their drones are picking up your people like cherries, and Pakistan is now becoming the mistress of China. Tackle your country first brother before calling people names. 3 Nobel prizes from Bengali people alone; what have you? AK-47 and stinger missile ? And raping and killing innocent women; is that your culture? Pardon my rudeness.
wavinglight 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I explained you earlier..........Let me explain again ........Hitler captured starlinGuard from Russia In 1941,Russia commander was ordered to surrender his men n him self to Nazi's.What did it mean.Did Russia lost the whole war...Did whole Russia surrendered?Listen Pal Pakistanis surrendered just a western battlefield......Indian couldn't dare to attack on eastern fronts....these are the facts.......And if you teach wrong history to you generations it will effect india's future.
emaadN70 9 months ago
SEE 11 PORKIES DISLIKED THIS VIDEO>>>LOL
bobin2627 11 months ago
Abay lund k siron indianon....hahaa. 1971 war was lost by Pakistan at only one post that is Bangladesh.....what about other post.Azad Kashmir,punjab...sindh,rajhistan etc...read the history...See united nation documents....It was not called surrendered or defeat....If it was ,it must be somthing like surrendered of japan or germany ,,,..please i am not defending pakistan ...You have internet search your self...and one more thing...what about the helped of mukhti bahini...
emaadN70 11 months ago
sunny deol is the indian chuck norris
mutsza 11 months ago
indian itnay bahadur hien kia hum nay too koi nahi diakha
sajidalisaqib 1 year ago
madarchod pakistani kitni baar harega be
12bablu1984kumar 1 year ago
PAKISTAN RAPED GHANDI IN 1947 AND 1965 WE GAVE BANGLADESH INDEPENDENCE IN 1971 IN 1999 THE TALIBAN AND KASHMIRI MUJAHEDDIN TOOK ON THE WHOLE OF INDIAN MILITARY IN THEN 26/11 PETTY THREATS AGIANST PAKISTAN BUT NO SURGICAL STRIKE WIKI LEAKS INDIAS IS A PUSSY AND IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN HAAHAHAHAHAHAH
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 1 year ago
PAKISTAN RAPED GHANDI IN 1947 AND 1965 WE GAVE BANGLADESH INDEPENDENCE IN 1971 IN 1999 THE TALIBAN AND KASHMIRI MUJAHEDDIN TOOK ON THE WHOLE OF INDIAN MILITARY IN THEN 26/11 PETTY THREATS AGIANST PAKISTAN BUT NO SURGICAL STRIKE WIKI LEAKS INDIAS IS A PUSSY AND IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN HAAHAHAHAHAHAH
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 1 year ago
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE u guys gave Pakistan Indipendent? and then u guys gave 90 thousand prisoners of wars?..LOL>..how about lonngewala?. did u guy purposely loose to 100 something indian soldiers?...LOL..u must be!
muhammadsucksmycock1 11 months ago
@muhammadsucksmycock1 the same way china captured 61.000 indian pows the same way pakistan has captured 55.000 indian pows how are still in paki prisons no dig up your dead mothers grave and skull fuck the whore ur sister gets fucked by pakis every day gaynesh cock sucker tutueh raam sita hanumaan lon teh bajjj
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 11 months ago
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE so Hindu Indian soliders fucked 90,000 muslims Porkistani soliders and in process gave Bangladesh its freedom....how sweet..LOL...your fat allah and prostitute Muhammad must be crying in hell?!....LOL...i bet!...Insha fucking allah.....
muhammadsucksmycock1 11 months ago
@muhammadsucksmycock1 how many soldiers did your dead mother suck before she choked on paki cum wen u give birth to some daughters i will be the first wen to fuck them yeh in the fanny small tits better
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 11 months ago
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE u have to ask pedophile muhammad who sucking my cock right now!..LOL..insha fucking allah.....
muhammadsucksmycock1 11 months ago
haha! pakistanis get fucked BY INDIA again (1948), again (1965), again (1971), again (1999) and again (everyday!!!!)
carolinaindian 1 year ago
this is my one of the most favorite film.JAI HIND
saurabhCherished 1 year ago
British are bastards
MentalHenryKissinger 1 year ago
pakistan defeated india in every war pakistan zindabaad let.jud. jklf
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 1 year ago
Comment removed
Moebab 1 year ago
@KASHMIRI7864LYFE LOL and thats why porkistan was divied into 2 pieces.. HAHA porkistan got fucked every time!! Hindustan Zindabaad!!
TheIndianKashmiri 1 year ago
@JASHVEER22 Ek to tum log ho baray dilchasp, mar b khatay ho or mantay b nae o dub k mar jao j pora jinni v sharam ya hayaa naa di koi shay hai.
ThePakistaniMuslim 1 year ago
@SuperKnightranger Who have 500 soldiers? You? Huh! I tell you the truth.
In east Pakistan, we have only one squadron at dhaka airbase infact not a complete squadron but having 10 F-86 sabres. On the other hand, india had 10 squadrons means 180 aircrafts including hunters,migs. So shame on you that how shamlessly you have made riots in east pakistan, create mukti bahini and then shamlessly entered in our sacred land. Just shut up okkkk.
ThePakistaniMuslim 1 year ago
@ThePakistaniMuslim i did nt talk about bagladesh i m talking about 1971 war u stupid nd by the way east pakistan has nothing but now its bangladesh u dumb fellow
SuperKnightranger 1 year ago
@ThePakistaniMuslim whilst pakistan engaged on a genocide on ethnic bengalis killing 3 million people
boshy123 1 year ago
no doubt RAMBO alone killed everyone in Vietnam after USA was thrown out of Vietnam.
AusPakMan 1 year ago
Sunny deol the screamin bastard sucks.
Hope steven Spielberg takes on directing our war movies...Indo pak war stuff will really rock the movie world...that is IF produced and directed properly...
kirtankkkk 1 year ago
I LOVE INDIA :)
Pritash24 2 years ago 27
India could become the world's third largest economy by purchasing power parity, overtaking Japan in 2012. India is also expected to grow faster than China after 2020," a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers said.
baleshs 2 years ago
@1980 mohsinyou have been crushing us for a long time like in longewala ,asal uttar,jeshore' siyachin -list goes on and on and on...
sap3179 2 years ago
joy bangla. with da aid of india!
Sh8sTV 2 years ago
Insh Allah we will crush india ver soon, Pak forces zinda bad
1980Mohsin 2 years ago
hindustan ko mittane ka sapna dekne wale khud is duniya say mit gaye hai
samjhe chilgoje
SANDEEP1110002 2 years ago
Where do you get these facts boys? In Kargil war your soldiers were being killed like rats by only 700 Mujahids and they held off your whole division. If it wasnt for our traitor political leaders Kashmir was ours for the taking. Dont rush things guys... after all... we will take over India very soon. Lets see what you do when we are face to face!
haider2026 2 years ago
face to face will be the real war but india and the whole world knows that pakistan will blackmail india and the world to use nuclear weapons once india will control your army which is famous in surrendering. i think u forget 1971 when your arms were cut while sleeping and a cartoon called zaid hamid is giving you lecture to get off from your sleep. if this was the case then your army should not be killing taliban in your own territory.
baleshs 2 years ago
OKAY! DO IT....
Pritash24 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi Everybody,
To find TRUTH about Pakistan occupied Kashmir, please search "TheKashmirNews" on youtube and POST YOUR COMMENTS THERE which will matter a lot for us.
wekashmiri 2 years ago
forgot to mention 500000 indian cowards + 250000 mukti bhani's terrorists against 45000 Pak Army Jawans... with supply routs sealed off and outnumbering Pakistan in all departments by atleast 10:1 ratio the indians became lions... LOL!
haider2026 2 years ago
that is called planning and intelligence asshole
nkaditya 2 years ago
@PWFI Hey u dumb ass... u all pak ppl & gov r wasting every ones time, money and energy by supporting terrorism... pak is always against ind n want to defeat ind but we want to defeat terrorism and who supports them... but u dumb ass will never understand..
ketya4u 2 years ago
@ketya4u Pakistann never wanted to fight with india but if india pangay lay ga to defence hamara right hai so ager us defence mai tm logo ko defeat hoti hai to phr rona nahi chiay.
ThePakistaniMuslim 1 year ago
hahah, its funny reading all the comments made by people without citing any references. How about go on wikipedia and see what the neutral sources have to say and yes references have been provided.
nxtvctm 2 years ago
Abe Gaaandooo tere 90000 baaapon ki chudaai ki thi Indian army ne. bhool gaya shaayad. Katora le ke har doosre din pahunch jaate bheek maangne. Saalon kuch to sharam karo. Saale khairaat par jo internet chal raha hai woh bhi band ho jaayega. India in not developed country so the unicef figures are correct. Gaandu kuch to apana bana log. Movie bhi Indian dekthe ho :D
nsawaan 2 years ago 24
@nsawaan Well said....
ketya4u 2 years ago
Muslim Umah is certainly one. But there is difference between Ummah and rulers of muslim world.
As far as talibans r concerned, these talibans in FATA qill b finshed in next 2 to 3 yrs as soon as US leave afganistan. And u better care of Naxal and their Red Corridor. U will enjoy fot having fun from Naxals.
mstariq 2 years ago
Why don't you say Saudi's consider other muslims inferior. :D. Don't worry about the red corridor. We won't use heavy artillary or US help to contain them . All the best for next 2-3 years :D
nsawaan 2 years ago
You guys won the war because of traitor Bengali.
tmirdotorg 2 years ago
Win matters. doesn't matter how it is achieved.
nsawaan 2 years ago
sallay sirf film wich e jang jeet sakday nay,wassai tai gand patt jandi ey , go to sleep if not M.M.Alam is coming
PWFI 2 years ago
@PWFI--search for "Squadron Leader Alam of the Pakistan Air Farce" for the truth abt the fagot/braggart Alam.....his exploits are as truthful as the story of buraq and stupid mo
bvindh 2 years ago
sllay jahan kay, first learn to writte farce=/=force, i think you were educated in gandoostan national university, hahahha, Evryone know the reality about GAF=gandoostan air force,5 time biggest then PAF, but PAF get air superioty in 24H hahah
PWFI 2 years ago
nah we know that PAF=Pakistan Air Farce....not force....btw....it takes some intelligence to understand sarcasm...hence impossible for a paki to understand sarcasm
bvindh 2 years ago
lol,it's why we can't understan what does mean Shinning gandoostan,right??? more than 40 millions prostituted womans and childrens...more than 300 millions gandoostan sleep in street.....hahhaha
PWFI 2 years ago
and considering the fact that the same people...the people who sleep on streets...have cut pak in half?
if you say that we are sub-par....it simply implys that you pakis are so pathetic that you were defeated by those very sub-par human beings....see...you cant even win a simple argument...much less a war
bvindh 2 years ago
LOL, really idiot,Jab gand mein dum nahi tha tauo East pakistan mein Terroriste ko help kar kay pakistan ko taurnay ki sajach kar di, kyon kay 1965 we have give a very nice lesson,But now it's different we don't need to fight against gandoostan becauze in your own country evrybody want indepandance becauze you hindu are incapable to gov,anybody, only in 62 years millions of innocent people were killed, but look our muslim histoiry if have force you to convert to islam today no one will be hindu
PWFI 2 years ago
too much hot air from a bunch of muslims whose primary livelyhood is defined as "licking american boots".....btw..paki muslims havnt dropped from arabia...but hindus converted at the arab knife point.....but u still celebrate the fact that their male ancestors were killed and female were raped....cheap bastards.
1965.....read some neutral history book...not fagot paki textbooks...atleast read the dawn news paper....afterall its established by the fagot jinnah
bvindh 2 years ago
hahhaha, you havn't got any arguments it's why you are changing the subject idiot fagot gandu, if muslim have converts all hindu wiht knife point ,today no one in gandoostan will be a hindu;we have ruled you over 1000 years. You can won a war only in bollywod film,it's realty!
PWFI 2 years ago
"you havn't got any arguments it's why you are changing the subject"--took you 5 days to respond...its obvious who is out of arguments
"if muslim have converts all hindu wiht knife point ,today no one in gandoostan will be a hindu"--that's precisely what auranzeb tried...he led his empire to disintegration trying to subdue a much smaller hindu kingdom...after 25 years of futile war and pyrrhic victories, he died lonely, sorry and without any strong heirs.
bvindh 2 years ago
"we have ruled you over 1000 years"--it would be true only if you are an afghan of mongol origin....but i believe you are a punjabi...who was defeated and subdued...btw, why all the paki missiles are named after afghan war lords??!!...unless your women are raped by them??
"You can won a war only in bollywod film"--so, your text books teach that bangladesh exists only in bollywood movies?...as usual, you are pathetic!!
bvindh 2 years ago
lol,no punjabi,no sindi, no pathan........but the only thing is we are muslim, you want to disinform me, hahah, i know all of our missiles have muslim name, . So about bangladesh, in 1965 we have kick you very bad, gandoostan was rape very badly by pak army, so 1971 you knew if you attack directly pakistan the result will be same to 1965, it's why you have use first Terroristes "KUKHTAR BANNI"
PWFI 2 years ago
no intelligence...no common sense...whats's the chances that an arab will even let you enter his house?
even afghans laugh at your moronic way of naming missiles
bvindh 2 years ago
S.M. Burke writes — After the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 the balance of military power had decisively shifted in favor of India. Pakistan had found it difficult to replace the heavy equipment lost during that conflict while her adversary, despite her economic and political problems, had been determinedly building up her strength.
bvindh 2 years ago
Rasul Bux Rais, a Pakistani political analyst wrote--The 1965 war with India proved that Pakistan could neither break the formidable Indian defenses in a blitzkrieg fashion nor could she sustain an all-out conflict for long.
bvindh 2 years ago
proof--"India won the war. It gained 1,840 square kilometers of Pakistani territory: 640 square kilometers in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 square kilometers of the Sailkot sector; 380 square kilometers far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 square kilometers on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 square kilometers of Indian territory: 490 square kilometers in the Chhamb sector and 50 square kilometers arounf Khem Karan."
bvindh 2 years ago
Several Pakistani writers criticized the military's ill-founded belief that their "martial race" of soldiers could defeat "Hindu India" in the war
the myth of racial superiority was largely disproved in 1965 when despite having more sophisticated equipment, numerical preponderance in tanks and the element of surprise the Pakistan Armoured Division miserably failed at Khem Karn
bvindh 2 years ago
@ 5:54
The only good porkistani is a dead one...
Praise Allah!!!
Jai Hind!!!
duker1231 2 years ago
lol ab tumari gaand yea sikh hi marrein gay! hahahahfree khalistan
PWFI 2 years ago
its not real..its an indian movie
uzairrr 2 years ago
Comment removed
Moebab 2 years ago
Its a long story. :-)
udit87420 2 years ago
@Moebab cuz they are a bunch of molested pigs1
siddharth77777 1 year ago
@Moebab I can answer that... well killings by Pakistan army are still not proved even after 40 years of investigation and dont say that Pakistan tried to stop that because Pakistani influence had long been finished. And by the way in 71 you proved that you have no respect for international borders and in kargil you you said that Pakistan had voilated the line of control (that is much less stable and can be changed any time) its all so funny.....
sjjumani 1 year ago
@Moebab pakis are ruthless they dont care for anyone they ill and go on killing and on and on they should be finished and thats what is happening now bomblast everyday
alokraja1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Moebab 2 years ago
dude major kuldeep singh chandpuri!
kobenbagreat 2 years ago
?? he just killed a civilian??
KOGR11 2 years ago
Nope, He was the pakistani informer and army had to interrogate him.
udit87420 2 years ago 9
@KOGR11 A civilian ? really ?! A civilian performing acts of treason, firing upon a regular officer during time of war ...do you even study law or know the standard constitution of whichever country you live in, even Southern Sudan included. Please be little more responsive.
wavinglight 7 months ago
@wavinglight Yes a civilian, the soldier in the scene was fully capable of apprehending the informer without killing him, the absurdity of the scene aside. I dont have to study law OR know my country's constitution a to z, however my common sense from serving in afghanistan on two tours is quite enough to tell me, which scenes in a movie are simply absurdities invented by an over zealous civilian movie director. Please dont insult yourself by asking people to respond to a 2 year old comment.
KOGR11 7 months ago
Comment removed
wavinglight 7 months ago