Not many real Western women left; just bodies and naked minds sans femininity, grace, elegance, poise, true motherhood and all the peaceful, loving, kind, understanding qualities which have been stripped out of the female conciousness by feminism. Janet Napolitano is both the new man and the new woman. Thats cultural Marxism.
voting isnt a right its a privellage to the people who have to fight and die for there country reguardless of what they say aka the draft untill women are included in the draft they should not be able to vote thats not sexist its fair i aint gonna die for your right just because your a woman no way your gonna grab an M16 and march right next to me you want equality? then your gonna get the responisbillities that come with it fair enough
@IrishAustrianCath IF YOUR A BIG READER THE WORD NEGRO DOESNT STAND JUST FOR ONE RACE..YOU WHITE NEGRO WE ALL HAVE A LIL THIS AND A LIL THAT IN OUR BLOOD!!!!!!!!
@Whitearyanconquerer There are many men who can't do my job. I'm an energy analyst. So according to your logic professional women like me do deserve the vote?
Women and men are equal under law and morals. We will always have the right to vote and speak our minds or we will leave this country and go to one that respects us, no man, woman, god, or animal can take away the rights we were born with.
@thecapdepepene1 This is really sad, you need to look at how many people hate you. Please don't reply to my comment because I have so many more important things to do in my life than arguing with a WASTE OF SPACE like you.
Nature produces excess trying to find the few that are intelligent and capable of leading the world out of despair and into the next cycle of civilization. Unfortunately many women today represent the 'excess.' It's going to be fun watching these fangirls get hacked up by mobs of unruly Negroes with machetes.
I guess we all know why the serpent tempted the woman rather than the man. Had he tried to fool the man, there probably would have been no fall otherwise. Just a dead serpent!
There should be litmus tests before anyone can vote. You should be literate, obviously. You should be a LEGAL citizen. You should at least be able to pass a test on the Bill of Rights and the Articles of the Constitution. If you're on welfare you should NOT be allowed to vote, period.
This mass democracy we have nowadays is a scam of quantity over quality. If half the population is on welfare, then that's a huge block of voters who can vote themselves money off the backs of people who work.
I like the comments that 'everything used to be good for us'. No, it used to be good for men. The dominant ones; the ones who write history. Naturally generational discourse is that society and families are 'happy' because it the male narrative.
I know I'm wasting my time because you've clearly made your irrational male minds up and apparently that's somehow superior to female irrationality.
The ones who write history? If it's men that wrote the history you know, why is your history so obviously bloated with falsity? Are you a Women's Studies graduate? Watch to much Oprah or W channel? Seriously, the revisionism that has polluted the collective unconscious of bitter women and misled males is an utter farce. Try picking up a real book of plain facts and establish a balanced view of the way things are and the way they've been: Women and children first.
And saying women don't have positions of leadership doesn't automatically evidence discrimination or oppression. Everything you've just cited indicates that I was right about you the first time. The only one making wayward assertions is you. Who said I support the war? Who said I give a shit about what Jesus would do? Your history IS revisionist, as you ultimately discount the female complicity and participation in the advent of social structures that have emerged in the bygone.
@Hzqi The comment about the war wasn't directed at you- I did state it was 'generally'. And I apologise for assuming to know what I didn't- even though you persist in doing so- I've never even heard of the W Channel... I appreciate your arguments about industrialisation but I believe that women participated only as the non-powerful, subservient role, usually reinforced by religious dogma. I do not believe for a second that men invented things for women out of any altruistic motives. It's about $
Capitalism reigns over most endeavours. But the ORDER of invention is compelling. While men were dying of black lung, women were being blessed with the wonders of spin-cycle-fantastique. And it's interesting that you mention money, because the desires of, and the resource of women, is the most pivotal aspect of feminism. In a mixed capitalism society, there is always a push and pull between the free-enterprize and the redistribution of wealth. The big secret that most federal economists won't-
-tell you, is that the redistribution is effectively directed towards women because of the way women feed the economic cycle with their spending propensity. Feminism ITSELF is all about business from every angle. Everyone wins from it, except the common working man. It's a way to inflate the overall governing capacities of government, compelled by fear-campagins that instill the feeling of righteousness into the public about further approving social campaigns. And the female recipients gain, too
Not only are women the spendy furnace of the economy, they're generally around 56 percent of the voting population, and they are far more prone to being swinging voters, because they're emotionally driven aestheticism makes them more susceptable to superficial pleading. Call it sexism all you want, I've seen plenty of it, myself. It's not because they're stupid. Just more ruled by emotion and sentimental reasoning. The political sphere isn't stupid, either, and plays to this.
I've been jolted into incredulity at times, but few times as much as when she trailed off into a cul-de-sac about how "MRA's aren't topical". According to Diana Boston, it's not just that she thinks whichever MRAs are wrong. No, they aren't topical. It's understandable though, as the barely restrained revelation of deposed misinformation is evident, and makes sense against the incapacity to logically refute. Ad-hominems are one thing. With her, it's the only thing.
While I'm simply scratching the surface, I'm talking way over the heads of what most people with honorable intent have ever contemplated about the circumstances of the gender divide. This persistent myth that society today, or previously is the culmination of men suiting themselves and damning the ladies, would be hilarious if not so evilly and successfully ingrained. Patriarchalism as a concept, isn't even compatible with capitalist model. Male bashing however, is great profit. Shopping anyone?
Conspiratorial? No, counter-conspiratorial. The subjectivity of that kind of accusation is merely relative to who's playing the piper. My "assertions" are not Elam inspired. I just referenced him, because sometimes other's have made similar points in effective ways. If you don't concur, here's an idea, refute. People with a chip on their shoulder don't sound anything like me. Oddly however, when an alike accusation flies at me, it's usually by someone displacing reason with hostility.
No, it's imbeciles like Diana Boston that have a king-size chip on their shoulder. Here, I'll transcribe directly from one of her vids for you:
AWWW, POOR WITTLE MRA'S CAN'T COME HERE AND LEAVE STUPID COMMENTS ANYMORE. BOO FUCKING HOO. I LOVE WOMEN. THEY'RE MORE INTELLIGENT, MORE BEAUTIFUL AND MORE EVOLVED. GO SIT AND SPIN ON THAT YOU KNUCKLEDRAGGING INSECURE WITTLE MEN.
This is from a person who purports to represent the cause of "equality". Yes, and Hannibal Lector is a vegan.
@Hzqi The comment about the war wasn't directed at you- I did state it was 'generally'. And I apologise for assuming to know what I didn't- even though you persist in doing so- I've never even heard of the W Channel... I appreciate your arguments about industrialisation but I believe that women participated only as the non-powerful, subservient role, usually reinforced by religious dogma. I do not believe for a second that men invented things for women out of any altruistic motives.It's about $
Take a good look at the first world today. What are feminists still hell bent on? CONVINCING women of what they SHOULD be doing, at the same time trying to convince everyone else that women's underrepresentation in politics is because of the EVUL PATRIARCHYZ! 10s of thousands of westerners convert to Islam every year. Want to hear the kicker? Most of them are women. Your thinking, like most feminists, is the false conflation of contemporary preference to historical enforcement.
The problem is the scornful derision visited upon the entirity of the male, and disseminated through the fulminating broadcast of gender-agendered halfwits. As Elam said: "[For the courtesy of making the world safe enough to leave the cave, they spit on us on the way out]". Even today, the hideous conflict within the male psyche, is the message of guilt visited upon them rubbing against the imperative of chivalry that governs their outlook. Men have to be coaxed out of this haze to see clearly.
Just because a modern generation determines that the model of civilization that they inhabit isn't in keeping with their own values set, doesn't mean that the prior inhabitants didn't contribute to, or approve of the social structure. Women and men have previously held more gender oriented status in society. This wasn't primarily determined by a simple mechanism. SUR-VI-VAL. Biological traits and suitabilities, that also earmarked who was not only better equipped, but more WILLING to roles.
This entire pretense of men trying to keep women down isn't only wrong, it's fucking nefarious and disgraceful. As Paul Elam once pointed out, MEN invented the contraptions that made women's lives easier around the household, before they even invented technology to stop them from dying from workplace hazards like coal dust. Want to know what liberated women? BEEP! No, not feminism. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION. Once the social environment was more suitable to female participation-
-they decided that they wanted in. Instead of thanking men for the manufacture of a civilization the facilitated the very workplace environment that enabled their participation, however, a much of sandy-crotch morons got it into their muddled heads that some asinine breed of revisionist history that completely excludes the DAILY REALITY of working life in the past, was orchestrated to prevent their involvement. As if they'd have EVER opted to endure what the common working man used to.
Women's groups in times past, it is known, held celebrations at isolated junctures of history, specifically BECAUSE a recession, or a war, was over allowing them to return to the homestead where THEY assert that they want to be. Feminism hasn't been merely a war against prevailing social structure, but against biology. The nesting instinct of women is neither secret nor mysterious.
The notion that women wanted change in social structure isn't the problem. Men have ALWAYS been receptive.
Receptive to the signals of women's whims. Just like the trad phenomenons of stuff like "metrosexuals" and snags. There was a study done once that explicitly indicated that women's attraction to higher affectations of masculinity in men, is directly proportionate to their proximity to war. Or other ominous or imminent dangers. The whims of women are guided by their circumstances, and the whims of males are guided by women. Always have been. The ladies wanted change, they got it.
i am a single mom and an energy analyst for Royal Dutch Shell and if any man here says he is smarter or superior to me I invite him to prove it. If I don't deserve the vote then neither do most men in Canada.
@vampyregirl100 It is true that some women are more intelligent than (probably) most men. But generally most women are not cleverer than most men.
Our governance needs to be based on generalities rather than possible exceptions like yourself.
If it is unfair to withdraw women's right to vote it is only unfair to a tiny minority. And not as unfair as allowing a generally thoughtless and over-emotional section of population voting rights.
Of course women should not be given voting rights. They will vote in a nanny state each and every time so that the government can fulfill their role as mothers and they can go out with their radical feminism destroying both themselves and their nations.
Yes, they never should have been given the right to vote. They are destroying our country and the nuclear family, running AMOK. Now we can see why patriarchy worked so well for our people for thousands of years.. women need a strong father or husband in their lives, and to get married early and be at home having babies and cooking and cleaning, men need to work outside the home in meaningful employment. It's called teamwork!
Yes there's a reason why women will rule in all spheres of life in a not so far future too, the power between the sexes shifts throughout the ages, the best is equality however people are fucking stupid therefore one gender will most likely always rule over the other.
@PortRichmondCatholic This is true. For every one intelligent woman who can look past her emotions, there are twenty that will follow the 95% of celebrities wearing an Obama tee-shirt, "rather than vote for the old guy".
No I'm trying to prove women should not be allowed to vote men have to defend them from invaders. These mindless jellyfish would open the door to for Satan. If white men die these creatures will be raped enslaved by who ever conquers them. So I think we should have a bit more to say
@PortRichmondCatholic Women think with emotions and emotion unlike logic and rational works off of no base, no platform or no foundation. This is why you see eradicate behavior so common in women.
and unfortaley this thought process does not change during the voting process... Dont believe? Well go ahead and ask a women about the candidates and why she supports them. You'll hear ever answer expect the issues...
I have added women from years past different races they all exhibit the same mindless and very dangerous worshiping of false idols. So know one can say this is racist
@KFCHaunting: "most of the women I know emotionally fall apart, when facing the gruesome facts of reality."
And why you do you think that would be? It's not natural, that's for sure. If this was even true, you could thank the elites who have run Western society for the past 1,700 years{at least}.
Just to let you know those black girls were screaming for white guy, A extremely gay looking British guy. It shows you the mind set of women don't be too hard on them for voting for obama they don't realize what they do. You have to treat women like they are little kids sometimes we really need to address this problem
Men gave women the vote and all of their other freedoms, and men can take it all away. It's happened in Iran and Afghanistan. Could it happen in the West?
@IrishAustrianCath: F***ing idiot. How you would you like it if one day, the American people decided to take the rights of Catholic men away? You'd change your tune right then.
I don't think this is real women though. For example my sisters bums out Hannah Montana pretty bad BUT she never did this with other actors/singer/tools whatever. I think she behaves differently when she sees her because in the program it self Hannah Montana is constantly been chased, spotted, OMFG is HANNAH.........
Get my point? I think it brainwashing and general dumbing down!
Yes they should not be allowed to vote but neither should niggers,jews or any of the mud races only white men who own property should vote. Wait I think I read that somewhere before.
@drmoogala Well since White people are going to die out, eventually Non-Whites are going to need the right to vote for their future country anyways. :]
You got that right. However the non-taxpaying wetback or ghetto nig nog along with white race mixing traitors should all be deported out of here. That really would solve our problems. I am sick of this personally. Which Confederate solider is your icon of?
Only a small fraction of women can deal with serious issues in a serious and frank manner. Generally, most of the women I know emotionally fall apart, when facing the gruesome facts of reality. Thus, I hereby conclude that women should no longer vote or be allowed in politics.
Come on, men are the ones who screwed up this planet. But let's compromise. Why not only let MOTHERS vote and FATHERS vote but not single childless people. i don't believe people are fully developed mentally or emotionally until they have reproduced. If someone is not capable of reproducing themselves, it is Mother Natures way of saying their gene pool is not good enough. If you want to use logic, let's use logic. If you simply don't like women, the problem lies with your mind.
You've the intellect of a pea, people who don't have kids in this age are some of the most intelligent people on the face of the earth, unlike the majority of humans who decide to contribute to the overpopulation of our species by having unprotected sex, or simply having a baby because it's thought to be normal. Here's a new rule, people who don't reproduce in today's age deserve more respect than our fellow breeder counterparts. : ) Only a selected amount of humans should breed, the end.
We'll need a cute name to convince women to vote away their vote. I think we could call the bill, "The Historical Gender Superiority Reconstruction Act 2009", unless anyone can come up with a better name.
Sounds good to me. If we can only pull Tom Cruise away from that heretical paganism he practices and return him to the faith that he once trained for the priesthood.
@5:47 they show how disloyal they are and they should never be trusted
Yes it should be revoked along with the 16th and 17th Amendment and the uncivil Rights Act too. Dont get me started because I am a woman. Only LAND owners should have the right to vote and that is the way it used to be. Not anymore and look at where we are NOW.
Criminals homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to vote. Women would have a vote what the best way to cook Lasangna or a roast. Blacks would have a vote in their community. Males would judge whats right for the people each community should give their respected leader the right to decide. The idea of a national election is BS. I'm gonna post this video of India's candidates campaigning they look like a bunch of shamans charming snakes
I already refuse female DRs. because they are not as knowledgeable as men. And this is coming from a woman. We are different and that is OK - we are not all "equal" either. Woman have their place and this is NOT one of them. Just like man have their place and some things they just shouldnt do for jobs.
no it shouldnt letting women vote must stay
rocker451000 5 months ago
Not many real Western women left; just bodies and naked minds sans femininity, grace, elegance, poise, true motherhood and all the peaceful, loving, kind, understanding qualities which have been stripped out of the female conciousness by feminism. Janet Napolitano is both the new man and the new woman. Thats cultural Marxism.
americaisbacktrump 5 months ago
voting isnt a right its a privellage to the people who have to fight and die for there country reguardless of what they say aka the draft untill women are included in the draft they should not be able to vote thats not sexist its fair i aint gonna die for your right just because your a woman no way your gonna grab an M16 and march right next to me you want equality? then your gonna get the responisbillities that come with it fair enough
MetalicaFan2007 1 year ago
@MetalicaFan2007
Voting is not for women.
ugha323a 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep worming Russian girls gettop5.info
jdebra87 1 year ago
I wonder how many women voted for Obama just because everytime they saw him on screen it gave them a tingly feeling between their legs.
aurash91 1 year ago
Since men commit the majority of gun crimes, the 2nd Amendment should be revoked for men, too.
TFarache 1 year ago
@TFarache Most of those crimes are committed by negro men let's deport them
IrishAustrianCath 1 year ago
@IrishAustrianCath IF YOUR A BIG READER THE WORD NEGRO DOESNT STAND JUST FOR ONE RACE..YOU WHITE NEGRO WE ALL HAVE A LIL THIS AND A LIL THAT IN OUR BLOOD!!!!!!!!
amarie2007 1 year ago
Yes, they are too easily duped by communist, such as the Juice who brought us feminism.
foxrat123 1 year ago
The guy who made this video is obviously a faggot and likes it up the ass.
Women-hating = gay
eXclusiveSupastar 1 year ago
@Whitearyanconquerer There are many men who can't do my job. I'm an energy analyst. So according to your logic professional women like me do deserve the vote?
vampyregirl100 1 year ago
Comment removed
vampyregirl100 1 year ago
port richmond just go side huging some christians, your religion is on a downfall anyway.
iamismehellyeah 1 year ago
Comment removed
thecapdepepene1 1 year ago
Women and men are equal under law and morals. We will always have the right to vote and speak our minds or we will leave this country and go to one that respects us, no man, woman, god, or animal can take away the rights we were born with.
twihard201 1 year ago
Comment removed
thecapdepepene1 1 year ago
@thecapdepepene1 Duh, Britain,Germany, France...First world countries that care about human rights...
twihard201 1 year ago
Comment removed
thecapdepepene1 1 year ago
@thecapdepepene1 This is really sad, you need to look at how many people hate you. Please don't reply to my comment because I have so many more important things to do in my life than arguing with a WASTE OF SPACE like you.
twihard201 1 year ago
Women's suffrage. We gave them the right to vote and we've been suffering ever since.
FishTheMargins 1 year ago
Nature produces excess trying to find the few that are intelligent and capable of leading the world out of despair and into the next cycle of civilization. Unfortunately many women today represent the 'excess.' It's going to be fun watching these fangirls get hacked up by mobs of unruly Negroes with machetes.
I guess we all know why the serpent tempted the woman rather than the man. Had he tried to fool the man, there probably would have been no fall otherwise. Just a dead serpent!
ThothX 1 year ago
There should be litmus tests before anyone can vote. You should be literate, obviously. You should be a LEGAL citizen. You should at least be able to pass a test on the Bill of Rights and the Articles of the Constitution. If you're on welfare you should NOT be allowed to vote, period.
This mass democracy we have nowadays is a scam of quantity over quality. If half the population is on welfare, then that's a huge block of voters who can vote themselves money off the backs of people who work.
DestroyZOG12 1 year ago
Women are allowed to vote?
jasperpaws24 1 year ago
woah woah woah, who gave them rights in the first place
darkweaversythnas 1 year ago
Is Obama the issue here? Many MEN voted for Obama did they not? Should there voting rights be taken away?
vampyregirl100 1 year ago
@vampyregirl100 The issue is not Obama, the issue is the fact that women are stupid as fuck.
hornymanonfire 1 year ago
@hornymanonfire Men are no smarter
vampyregirl100 1 year ago
@vampyregirl100 you mad?
hornymanonfire 1 year ago
I like the comments that 'everything used to be good for us'. No, it used to be good for men. The dominant ones; the ones who write history. Naturally generational discourse is that society and families are 'happy' because it the male narrative.
I know I'm wasting my time because you've clearly made your irrational male minds up and apparently that's somehow superior to female irrationality.
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
@mikejmeehan
The ones who write history? If it's men that wrote the history you know, why is your history so obviously bloated with falsity? Are you a Women's Studies graduate? Watch to much Oprah or W channel? Seriously, the revisionism that has polluted the collective unconscious of bitter women and misled males is an utter farce. Try picking up a real book of plain facts and establish a balanced view of the way things are and the way they've been: Women and children first.
Hzqi 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
@mikejmeehan
And saying women don't have positions of leadership doesn't automatically evidence discrimination or oppression. Everything you've just cited indicates that I was right about you the first time. The only one making wayward assertions is you. Who said I support the war? Who said I give a shit about what Jesus would do? Your history IS revisionist, as you ultimately discount the female complicity and participation in the advent of social structures that have emerged in the bygone.
Hzqi 1 year ago
@Hzqi The comment about the war wasn't directed at you- I did state it was 'generally'. And I apologise for assuming to know what I didn't- even though you persist in doing so- I've never even heard of the W Channel... I appreciate your arguments about industrialisation but I believe that women participated only as the non-powerful, subservient role, usually reinforced by religious dogma. I do not believe for a second that men invented things for women out of any altruistic motives. It's about $
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
Capitalism reigns over most endeavours. But the ORDER of invention is compelling. While men were dying of black lung, women were being blessed with the wonders of spin-cycle-fantastique. And it's interesting that you mention money, because the desires of, and the resource of women, is the most pivotal aspect of feminism. In a mixed capitalism society, there is always a push and pull between the free-enterprize and the redistribution of wealth. The big secret that most federal economists won't-
Hzqi 1 year ago
-tell you, is that the redistribution is effectively directed towards women because of the way women feed the economic cycle with their spending propensity. Feminism ITSELF is all about business from every angle. Everyone wins from it, except the common working man. It's a way to inflate the overall governing capacities of government, compelled by fear-campagins that instill the feeling of righteousness into the public about further approving social campaigns. And the female recipients gain, too
Hzqi 1 year ago
Not only are women the spendy furnace of the economy, they're generally around 56 percent of the voting population, and they are far more prone to being swinging voters, because they're emotionally driven aestheticism makes them more susceptable to superficial pleading. Call it sexism all you want, I've seen plenty of it, myself. It's not because they're stupid. Just more ruled by emotion and sentimental reasoning. The political sphere isn't stupid, either, and plays to this.
Hzqi 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
I've been jolted into incredulity at times, but few times as much as when she trailed off into a cul-de-sac about how "MRA's aren't topical". According to Diana Boston, it's not just that she thinks whichever MRAs are wrong. No, they aren't topical. It's understandable though, as the barely restrained revelation of deposed misinformation is evident, and makes sense against the incapacity to logically refute. Ad-hominems are one thing. With her, it's the only thing.
Hzqi 1 year ago
While I'm simply scratching the surface, I'm talking way over the heads of what most people with honorable intent have ever contemplated about the circumstances of the gender divide. This persistent myth that society today, or previously is the culmination of men suiting themselves and damning the ladies, would be hilarious if not so evilly and successfully ingrained. Patriarchalism as a concept, isn't even compatible with capitalist model. Male bashing however, is great profit. Shopping anyone?
Hzqi 1 year ago
Conspiratorial? No, counter-conspiratorial. The subjectivity of that kind of accusation is merely relative to who's playing the piper. My "assertions" are not Elam inspired. I just referenced him, because sometimes other's have made similar points in effective ways. If you don't concur, here's an idea, refute. People with a chip on their shoulder don't sound anything like me. Oddly however, when an alike accusation flies at me, it's usually by someone displacing reason with hostility.
Hzqi 1 year ago
No, it's imbeciles like Diana Boston that have a king-size chip on their shoulder. Here, I'll transcribe directly from one of her vids for you:
AWWW, POOR WITTLE MRA'S CAN'T COME HERE AND LEAVE STUPID COMMENTS ANYMORE. BOO FUCKING HOO. I LOVE WOMEN. THEY'RE MORE INTELLIGENT, MORE BEAUTIFUL AND MORE EVOLVED. GO SIT AND SPIN ON THAT YOU KNUCKLEDRAGGING INSECURE WITTLE MEN.
This is from a person who purports to represent the cause of "equality". Yes, and Hannibal Lector is a vegan.
Hzqi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hzqi The comment about the war wasn't directed at you- I did state it was 'generally'. And I apologise for assuming to know what I didn't- even though you persist in doing so- I've never even heard of the W Channel... I appreciate your arguments about industrialisation but I believe that women participated only as the non-powerful, subservient role, usually reinforced by religious dogma. I do not believe for a second that men invented things for women out of any altruistic motives.It's about $
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
Take a good look at the first world today. What are feminists still hell bent on? CONVINCING women of what they SHOULD be doing, at the same time trying to convince everyone else that women's underrepresentation in politics is because of the EVUL PATRIARCHYZ! 10s of thousands of westerners convert to Islam every year. Want to hear the kicker? Most of them are women. Your thinking, like most feminists, is the false conflation of contemporary preference to historical enforcement.
Hzqi 1 year ago
The problem is the scornful derision visited upon the entirity of the male, and disseminated through the fulminating broadcast of gender-agendered halfwits. As Elam said: "[For the courtesy of making the world safe enough to leave the cave, they spit on us on the way out]". Even today, the hideous conflict within the male psyche, is the message of guilt visited upon them rubbing against the imperative of chivalry that governs their outlook. Men have to be coaxed out of this haze to see clearly.
Hzqi 1 year ago
PS: Your statement about women being twice as likely to be a victim of violent crime is distilled, unmitigated bovine excretia.
Hzqi 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikejmeehan 1 year ago
Just because a modern generation determines that the model of civilization that they inhabit isn't in keeping with their own values set, doesn't mean that the prior inhabitants didn't contribute to, or approve of the social structure. Women and men have previously held more gender oriented status in society. This wasn't primarily determined by a simple mechanism. SUR-VI-VAL. Biological traits and suitabilities, that also earmarked who was not only better equipped, but more WILLING to roles.
Hzqi 1 year ago
This entire pretense of men trying to keep women down isn't only wrong, it's fucking nefarious and disgraceful. As Paul Elam once pointed out, MEN invented the contraptions that made women's lives easier around the household, before they even invented technology to stop them from dying from workplace hazards like coal dust. Want to know what liberated women? BEEP! No, not feminism. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION. Once the social environment was more suitable to female participation-
Hzqi 1 year ago
-they decided that they wanted in. Instead of thanking men for the manufacture of a civilization the facilitated the very workplace environment that enabled their participation, however, a much of sandy-crotch morons got it into their muddled heads that some asinine breed of revisionist history that completely excludes the DAILY REALITY of working life in the past, was orchestrated to prevent their involvement. As if they'd have EVER opted to endure what the common working man used to.
Hzqi 1 year ago
Women's groups in times past, it is known, held celebrations at isolated junctures of history, specifically BECAUSE a recession, or a war, was over allowing them to return to the homestead where THEY assert that they want to be. Feminism hasn't been merely a war against prevailing social structure, but against biology. The nesting instinct of women is neither secret nor mysterious.
The notion that women wanted change in social structure isn't the problem. Men have ALWAYS been receptive.
Hzqi 1 year ago
Receptive to the signals of women's whims. Just like the trad phenomenons of stuff like "metrosexuals" and snags. There was a study done once that explicitly indicated that women's attraction to higher affectations of masculinity in men, is directly proportionate to their proximity to war. Or other ominous or imminent dangers. The whims of women are guided by their circumstances, and the whims of males are guided by women. Always have been. The ladies wanted change, they got it.
Hzqi 1 year ago
i am a single mom and an energy analyst for Royal Dutch Shell and if any man here says he is smarter or superior to me I invite him to prove it. If I don't deserve the vote then neither do most men in Canada.
vampyregirl100 1 year ago
@vampyregirl100 It is true that some women are more intelligent than (probably) most men. But generally most women are not cleverer than most men.
Our governance needs to be based on generalities rather than possible exceptions like yourself.
If it is unfair to withdraw women's right to vote it is only unfair to a tiny minority. And not as unfair as allowing a generally thoughtless and over-emotional section of population voting rights.
whacktee 1 year ago
Of course women should not be given voting rights. They will vote in a nanny state each and every time so that the government can fulfill their role as mothers and they can go out with their radical feminism destroying both themselves and their nations.
nine32 1 year ago
Yes, they never should have been given the right to vote. They are destroying our country and the nuclear family, running AMOK. Now we can see why patriarchy worked so well for our people for thousands of years.. women need a strong father or husband in their lives, and to get married early and be at home having babies and cooking and cleaning, men need to work outside the home in meaningful employment. It's called teamwork!
7pt62manNW 1 year ago
women should stay in the kitchen and bake the cakes.
smithitt 2 years ago
theres a reason why men run the world. No matter what people say men are women are different. Absolutely different mindsets.
Echostarwb 2 years ago
Yes there's a reason why women will rule in all spheres of life in a not so far future too, the power between the sexes shifts throughout the ages, the best is equality however people are fucking stupid therefore one gender will most likely always rule over the other.
Ichliebemusikundybd 1 year ago
to be fair you can find herds of males on the street who are just as offensively stupid.
dismalite 2 years ago 11
@dismalite that's because most "men" are pussies now.
DonkeyKong96 2 weeks ago
Agreed. Women are too stupid to vote and most men too. Democracy is for losers.
tbone76a 2 years ago
no it has steadily declined with the female vote. We could have took the government back if it wasn't for women voting for obama clinton
PortRichmondCatholic 2 years ago
@PortRichmondCatholic This is true. For every one intelligent woman who can look past her emotions, there are twenty that will follow the 95% of celebrities wearing an Obama tee-shirt, "rather than vote for the old guy".
Dannyboy8155 1 year ago
Yes getting angry at being ripped off men fight thats what we were put on this earth for
PortRichmondCatholic 2 years ago
No I'm trying to prove women should not be allowed to vote men have to defend them from invaders. These mindless jellyfish would open the door to for Satan. If white men die these creatures will be raped enslaved by who ever conquers them. So I think we should have a bit more to say
PortRichmondCatholic 2 years ago
@PortRichmondCatholic Women think with emotions and emotion unlike logic and rational works off of no base, no platform or no foundation. This is why you see eradicate behavior so common in women.
and unfortaley this thought process does not change during the voting process... Dont believe? Well go ahead and ask a women about the candidates and why she supports them. You'll hear ever answer expect the issues...
Womens brain = emotions
Mens = logic and reason
dadecountyhustler305 1 year ago
I have added women from years past different races they all exhibit the same mindless and very dangerous worshiping of false idols. So know one can say this is racist
PortRichmondCatholic 2 years ago
@KFCHaunting: "most of the women I know emotionally fall apart, when facing the gruesome facts of reality."
And why you do you think that would be? It's not natural, that's for sure. If this was even true, you could thank the elites who have run Western society for the past 1,700 years{at least}.
SixtiesFan90 2 years ago
Young white females in this country are trash, most of them should be lined up and have a bullet put into the back of their heads.
Holt82 2 years ago
Just to let you know those black girls were screaming for white guy, A extremely gay looking British guy. It shows you the mind set of women don't be too hard on them for voting for obama they don't realize what they do. You have to treat women like they are little kids sometimes we really need to address this problem
PortRichmondCatholic 2 years ago
@Holt82 how does race faktor into that? Obama has waht a 91% among blacks lal
LeonSkottKennedey 6 months ago
This video is very hopeful to men everywhere.
Have a solid identity, and know where you're going. Insist on it.
And these women who obviously cannot think for themselves will respect your power.
Then you can teach them how not to be such irritating little girls.
neptune26 2 years ago
we were burning them at the stake only a few hundred years ago I think we need to light the fires again and teach them a lesson
IrishAustrianCath 2 years ago
@IrishAustrianCath: Are you that bigoted against women? I'm male, but the fact is, what you said is totally ridiculous.
SixtiesFan90 2 years ago
Men gave women the vote and all of their other freedoms, and men can take it all away. It's happened in Iran and Afghanistan. Could it happen in the West?
yocanbanconit 2 years ago
hopefully it needs to happen soon they aren't fit for freedom
IrishAustrianCath 2 years ago
@IrishAustrianCath: F***ing idiot. How you would you like it if one day, the American people decided to take the rights of Catholic men away? You'd change your tune right then.
SixtiesFan90 2 years ago
I've been saying for several years now, that it is the women, that are aiding in our nations demise.
Their "to each their own" attitude and voting with heart instead of reason, is a liberals dream-come- true.
Several of my aunts, in recent times, have come to say that a women should never be president. I must say I was shocked to hear this.
quaffer22 2 years ago
Obama lifts AIDS travel ban and invites them to the US watch?v=_jtF7tRiAxs
MrNationalistpride 2 years ago 2
Women nowadays are an embarrassment to the way women used to be, the way women should be, and the way precious few are.
Celebrities are just people and want to be treated as such.
ProudWhiteWoman 2 years ago 3
Frightening.
johnnyharpe 2 years ago
Monsieur Chauvin? lol
dJaegher 2 years ago
I think it's the true love for these mindless idiots that makes someone make a video pointing out just how low they have sunk
MrNationalistpride 2 years ago 2
That is what I thought:) Just wanted to make sure. We could certainly use a lot of him today.
GlobalMinority 2 years ago
I don't think this is real women though. For example my sisters bums out Hannah Montana pretty bad BUT she never did this with other actors/singer/tools whatever. I think she behaves differently when she sees her because in the program it self Hannah Montana is constantly been chased, spotted, OMFG is HANNAH.........
Get my point? I think it brainwashing and general dumbing down!
ForAreOwnGooD 2 years ago 3
Yes they should not be allowed to vote but neither should niggers,jews or any of the mud races only white men who own property should vote. Wait I think I read that somewhere before.
drmoogala 2 years ago 7
@drmoogala Well since White people are going to die out, eventually Non-Whites are going to need the right to vote for their future country anyways. :]
eXclusiveSupastar 1 year ago
@drmoogala Racist what if you were black think about it you would want to vote and hahahaha are president is black
yummytaco1 1 year ago
You got that right. However the non-taxpaying wetback or ghetto nig nog along with white race mixing traitors should all be deported out of here. That really would solve our problems. I am sick of this personally. Which Confederate solider is your icon of?
GlobalMinority 2 years ago
watch?v=m_EQ2r7nfE4
kps75 2 years ago
Only a small fraction of women can deal with serious issues in a serious and frank manner. Generally, most of the women I know emotionally fall apart, when facing the gruesome facts of reality. Thus, I hereby conclude that women should no longer vote or be allowed in politics.
KFCHaunting 2 years ago 2
Come on, men are the ones who screwed up this planet. But let's compromise. Why not only let MOTHERS vote and FATHERS vote but not single childless people. i don't believe people are fully developed mentally or emotionally until they have reproduced. If someone is not capable of reproducing themselves, it is Mother Natures way of saying their gene pool is not good enough. If you want to use logic, let's use logic. If you simply don't like women, the problem lies with your mind.
poloniawarrior 2 years ago
@poloniawarrior: Probably one of the most responsible comments I've heard on here.
SixtiesFan90 2 years ago
You've the intellect of a pea, people who don't have kids in this age are some of the most intelligent people on the face of the earth, unlike the majority of humans who decide to contribute to the overpopulation of our species by having unprotected sex, or simply having a baby because it's thought to be normal. Here's a new rule, people who don't reproduce in today's age deserve more respect than our fellow breeder counterparts. : ) Only a selected amount of humans should breed, the end.
Ichliebemusikundybd 1 year ago
We'll need a cute name to convince women to vote away their vote. I think we could call the bill, "The Historical Gender Superiority Reconstruction Act 2009", unless anyone can come up with a better name.
TwilightZoneClone 2 years ago
wonder why the US government is in Afghanistan forcing them to let women vote
LatinoInAmerica 2 years ago
Sounds good to me. If we can only pull Tom Cruise away from that heretical paganism he practices and return him to the faith that he once trained for the priesthood.
@5:47 they show how disloyal they are and they should never be trusted
IrishAustrianCath 2 years ago
Women can vote?! What's next, negros voting!
HolyHellPreacher 2 years ago
Yes it should be revoked along with the 16th and 17th Amendment and the uncivil Rights Act too. Dont get me started because I am a woman. Only LAND owners should have the right to vote and that is the way it used to be. Not anymore and look at where we are NOW.
GlobalMinority 2 years ago
Criminals homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to vote. Women would have a vote what the best way to cook Lasangna or a roast. Blacks would have a vote in their community. Males would judge whats right for the people each community should give their respected leader the right to decide. The idea of a national election is BS. I'm gonna post this video of India's candidates campaigning they look like a bunch of shamans charming snakes
LatinoInAmerica 2 years ago
Repeal the 19th Amendment
MidNightRider2001 2 years ago 4
At least you can say obama winning had nothing to do with his race just these mindless twits voting for him
2012HolyRomanEmpire 2 years ago 3
"Mindless" being the key word here.
MidNightRider2001 2 years ago 3
boycott everything run by women refuse female DR's and refuse to work for female supervisors or along side them unless it's something like waitress.
2012HolyRomanEmpire 2 years ago 3
I already refuse female DRs. because they are not as knowledgeable as men. And this is coming from a woman. We are different and that is OK - we are not all "equal" either. Woman have their place and this is NOT one of them. Just like man have their place and some things they just shouldnt do for jobs.
GlobalMinority 2 years ago