Added: 4 years ago
From: lynx29
Views: 68,524
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (650)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • To bad the Su-37 never made the final cut.

  • @vfIskullangel lolz yeah and the craptor which made it bankrupted america ....

  • @gloup81 It was the F-35 that caused America to go bankrupt.....

  • @vfIskullangel oficially yes but f22 played an important role aiding into that

  • Id say F22 and SU37 are about equal, SU 37 would destroy F22 in a dog fight, and F22 has much better stealth capability, It would depend on the circumstances. Personally i like the SU 37 more because i fucking hate Americans.

  • @TheThruster24 F22 is crap and nothing more...Su 37 is the best!

  • @DirtyThing20 How is Su-37 the best?In close combat I expect su-37 to win of course, but f-22 isnt built for that, its made in such a way that the SU wont even notice the F22 coming,stealthy with a rocket from 30 kilometers, instant KO, thats what it was designet for, covert missions, fast and deadly. To explain it, imagine a guy with a big bad sword (the Su-37) running around and screaming taunting everyone to fight, and you (f22) a sniper in distance of 200 meters aiming at the screaming idiot

  • @MICHAELSSJ4 well, planes are for close combat, rockets for far distances, and there is nothing more to discuss

  • @DirtyThing20 Planes are for close combat??? Excuse me but I would only expect such an answer from a 6 year old child who watched a movie on dogfights in the air and then started to make diferent amusing asumptions... Please do your homework before posting your bullshit on the net, there is nothing more to discuss.

  • @MICHAELSSJ4 Well, excuse me, go read history.

  • @MICHAELSSJ4 I wouldn't even expect to see the Su beat the F-22 in a dogfight. The F-22 has shown to be difficult to lock onto even at WVR, and remember the Su-37 videos you see are of performance aircraft that are not combat ready. Once you add external stores to it that creates drag and the maneuverability diminishes substantially. The F22 doesn't have that problem with weapons stored internally.

  • @TheTequilaShooter True, but what im trying to point out is that the F22 doesnt need to fight in close range, it doesnt have to fight at all, just obliderates everything from a distance. And I think thats the most important quality.

  • @MICHAELSSJ4 I understand. You're right that it primary function is to take out aircraft from BVR. Most aircraft won't even know that its in the area until its too late. Don't worry about Dirtything. He makes pointless comments that he can never back up. Ask him to tell you why he thinks the F-22 is crap and the Su is the best, and he'll avoid the question like the little girl that he is.

  • im betting for the US..

  • serbias major /russian lt.colonel/greek major of aircraftes so /doctors opinion. sukhoi37a is 5+generation and what mean to you about those advantages? nothing.+ mig35hd is 4+++generation one of worldsbest ever.sukhoi37a is more advanced and impulse adorn most powerful jet in the nebo/sky,-kosmosis of incredible todays orthodox science worldwide......3.048km/h 13g. .., cobra-bell in one point 24metara to roll in got to tail to 4four f-22/and shot them down. those are science facts.tihomir7777

  • serbias major /russian lt.colonel/greek major of aircraftes. so /doctors megaloso opinion....sukhoi37a is 5+generation and what mean to you about that should we can say advantages? nothing! ! ! ! ! ......sukhoi37a is more advanced and impulse adorn most powerful jet in the nebo/sky,-kosmosis of incredible todays orthodox science worldwide......3.048km/h 13g.........., cobra-bell in one point 24metara to roll in got to tail to 4four f-22/and shot them down. those are science facts.tihomir7777

  • Let me just say one thing. How can a fourth generation aircraft be "far superior" then a fifth generation aircraft...?

  • In dogfight no doubt it would.... but the Raptor would take him down before the su-37 knew the Raptor was aiming him. Thats why T-50 is coming! Although we have to remember that the most important part of a dogfight is the pilot!

  • I love the Su37, gorgeous aircraft. However Russian aircraft has never been much in a real fight. Korea, Vietnam, In the middle east aginst isreal. They look great on paper but fall like paper weights when in combat. Sorry Russians just the truth.

  • I know the crybaby SU-37 fanboys get really offended (looking at MrPunkskametal), but obviously the F-22 is far superior on the basis that it is a stealth aircraft. The title of this video is just silly considering an SU-37 cannot detect an F-22 let alone exterminate it. Don't know why fanboys ignore this and it's fine that you like the SU-37 the best. Claiming that it can beat and F-22 is another story.

  • su37 can not supercruse and is therefor inferior to f22 on that basis alone

  • The F-22 is to fighter aircraft what Windows Vista is to computing...super yabba-dabba out-of-this-world stuff...but loaded with bugs, malfunctions and trouble, that in the end make it not so good.

  • just shut the fuck up the su 37 is far superior

  • if WE WERE ALLIES... NO WAR WILL HAPPEN WE WILL BE TO STRONG FOR ANY TINY COUNTRIES OUT THERE TRYING TO GET "BIG" WE WILL JUST WIPE THEM OUT QUICK.

  • /watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M LOOL its funny how somehow foreign countries know everything bout US nad what is does and what/how its aircraft operate...........just like they knew that obamas trip to asia costed over 200million a day or 2billion a week LOOL

  • Why does almost everybody argue over these birds. Both planes are great and I would like to fly both of them.

    Also if a plane was shot down it's not because of the plane but of the pilots, pilots make the difference not the equipment.

  • 37 pilots can only hope and pray they don't encounter the 22. The 22's weapon systems are so superior, they'll be dead before they know what hit them.

  • F-22 ad Su-37 are both kick ass planes. Why can't anyone agree with that?

  • f-22 would make the su-37 eat its own shit fuck u russians

  • This piece of shit wouldn't even get close enough to an F-22 to "exterminate" it. Nice try, silly commies.

    Russian technology: Works 50% of the time, every time!

  • In every video so far , is some american cunt whos talk about how F-22 is godlike !! Bullshit , that plane never faced a real battle , F-22 take only some gayass exercises thats all .F-22 is myth .And american army is not so good how they claim and wish to be . In every millitary (not only) video always USA GUY starts to fight thats show your fucking agressive mentality.Who throwed away M-16 away in vietnam and taken AK-47 ???so shut it.And fuck your Discovery millitary channel aswell ,only lies

  • @Vykuk123 If the F-22 is a myth, then why do I fly them?

  • @guitarmaster127 Sure u fly them.........

  • @Vykuk123 I do buddy.

  • @guitarmaster127 A little tip, vykuk is a retard that seeks attention then just ends up saying "whatever loser" all over again, where you a former eagle pilot? from which squadron?, did you flew over Bosnia?

  • you guys are fucking stupid the su-37 cant compete w/ the 22 cuz that piece of shit that supposedly can do more than the f-22, got shown up in a video i just saw so yeah. plus the 22 is radar repelling so good luck finding it while hes riding your ass

    this thing looks old as hell too

  • you guys are fucking stupid the su-37 cant compete w/ the 22 cuz that piece of shit that supposedly can do more than the f-22, got shown up in a video i just saw so yeah. plus the 22 is radar repelling so good luck finding it while hes riding your ass

  • Well lets see, only 2 exsist It actually costs more than the Raptor (147

    .7 mill in 1996 and with global inflation would cost $199916444.55 almost 200 mill for today), doesnt have supercruise doesnt have stealth so Raptor owns at BVR and the F-22 is faster, flies higher, more powerful engines, stealthy, and has the most powerful avionics system ever put in a fighter. So yet again fanboys, my F-22 Raptor holds as God and Master of the Skies

  • bullshit,thats just a fucked up copy of the f 15 that russia stole

  • @tm101959 you are definetely retarted, have you ever seen the mig 25? was developed first, then look at the F-15, which was developed to counter the mig 25, and after that tell me whats a copy?

  • su37 rules !

  • музыка затмила перевод

  • здарова крендели

  • they said the same about the mig 15,17,21,23,25,29 Sukhoy 27-30 and now the SU-37.. history has taught us again and again that US fighter technology is far better than any russian or chinese combined.

  • ROFL @ american tards here..lmao morons..stealth DOES NOT mean invisible..it means LESS visible..ffs how dumb u r morons..F117A captured with modifyed old russian radar and shoted down from sky over Serbia..soz,we didn't knew it's invisible..LMAO..today russians developed a tone of improvements in radar/missile technology and ur myth propaganda F22 is canceled due to various stupid mistakes in development such as incapability to fly in rough weather conditions..OWNED..NOW FOFF!!!

  • @suchmachine THANK YOU, SOMEONE ACTUALLY KNOWS SOMETHING HERE

  • As much as I like Su-35, Su-35 is an F-15 killer. F-22 kills all current Russian planes, including the PAK-FA. You can't outgun, outrun and outmaneuver what you can't lock on to. No matter how much you maneuver, if you can't take the shot, you're done.

  • @blackshark1984 PAK FA is not in service, and can still be changed to something never seen before, so you cant assume anything about it yet, but i agree with everything else, i mean true its hard to find the f22 but its not impossible, but i would like to see an f22 vs su 37 or 47 battle, that would be insane

  • LOL. F-22 > Any kind of Russian/European crap.

  • @klober23 lack of knowledge,stuning amount of ignorance,unbeatable stupidity at highest level u presented with this statement..congratulations u pushed the limits!

  • @suchmachine At least I don't have the grammar of a caveman on cocaine.

  • @Airclot At least I'm trying to speak a non-origin language..^^..and tbh there is no point of corect grammar on yt comments since yt aint a test neither is a school service,and trying not to reach characters limit + typing in a rush,couple of letters might slip away and that's normal,not lack of english-in my case foreign language..smart ass..again u r moron like all,well 99.9% of americans..aswel there is no point arguing with u since u r way off topic..get some burgers and fuck off!!!

  • Cant out maneuver what u cant see...the su-37 would be shot out of the sky by an undetected Raptor.F-22 still owns all

  • the su-37 wouldnt even see the f-22 when the f-22 has its missiles locked on it. it doesnt matter how many maneuvers it can do in the long run

  • Yeah the SU-37 doesn't stand a chance against the F-22. Sorry all you russians out there, but that's the truth. The PAK T-50 is a worthy opponent to the Raptor. That one could be compared to the F-22, not the SU-37 however.

  • @wellerocks

    well,that isnt true dude,nothing can compare to su37,is not everything about stealth...is agility in this point. guy who tasted this plane challenged the guy with f22 and he refused to do combat trainig...

  • @pashou23 Warfare today isn't anything like what it was 20 years ago. Today it's about who has the best radars, the missiles with the longest range and most counterfits. Before the SU-37 even knows the F-22 is there, he's shot down without any notice.

  • hahaha, US planes fucked yours every single war!!!

  • @nosirrom5 they never had a war...

  • If we compare the technical characteristics of the two machines. Su-37 than F-22 on all major parameters, and much cheaper! Pseudo stealth F-22 is a myth, let them check on the fly F-22 over Russia!

  • F-22 exterminator? LoL.

  • Excellent maneuverability. I am sure it is a great machine for a dogfighting.

  • @Beshkardash If youre refering to the Su-37, yes indeed, excelent for dogfights...but just about mediocre at anything else.

  • Well Ive been working on a USAF base in Alaska, in preparation for the F-35 squadron thats gonna be stationed there very soon, Quess they lied, huh?...... surpise,surprise,surprise!

  • The F35 raptor doesn't exist... The F22 Raptor does. You don't know the names of aircraft and your in the Air Force??

  • watch?v=rRE9zas4-5s

    F-35 Raptor

    Some times it's better to listen than to speak.

  • watch?v=rRE9zas4-5s

    F-35 Raptor

  • F-35 Raptor..... best of the best

  • The "F-35 Raptor" dosent exist..

  • @pablytuzz

    IF-35 ITS A BOEING PLANE WITH STOVL

    F-22 ITS A LOCKEED PLANE

  • dude, i know them.

    but it's F-35 NOT IF-35 and the F-22 Raptor is a Lockheed Martin/Boeing proyect and the f-35 its from Lockheed Martin.. GET IT?

  • From the media at the time of the crash in 2002

    DATE:31/12/02

    SOURCE:Flight International

    Sukhoi demonstrator crashes during testing

    A Sukhoi Su-35 fighter demonstrator crashed on 19 December during flight testing. Test pilot Yuri Vashuk reported malfunctions before ejecting safely at Shatura, near Moscow. Test aircraft 711 has been deployed by Sukhoi on various test programmes, including the Su-37 multirole fighter, a thrust-vector derivative of the Su-35.

  • Guys,

    You are trying to debate an aircraft that hasn't existed for 10 years. The aircraft that you see with the side number 711 was converted back into an Su-35 from an Su-37 in 2000. 711 as an Su-35 crashed on 19th December 2002. Russia didn't continue with the Su-37 project. 711 was the one and only example.

  • poor russians, they think that speed and maneuverability still has a meaning? Su37 can maneuver all it wants. These days it is all about electronics. F-22 won't even have to outmaneuver the Su37, it will simply exit the fight and let the rockets to the world

    search DAS F-35 on youtube and enjoy the video:-)

    maneuverability is irrelevant

  • @normalais

    haha haven't we heard this before, the whole "the age of dogfighting is over" thing? Look what happened in Vietnam, missiles didn't work and US pilots were in deep shit because they didn't know how to dog fight. We can't be making this mistake again!

  • vietnam? LMAO when was that? like 500 years ago?

  • History can repeat itself........ and how is DAS supposed to work when US pilots have the rules of engagement that they have?

  • Amazing how somne guys are always trying to belittle others.Why not enjoy the videos for what  they are and show I E amazing pieces of engineering piloting skills and aero display.

  • while this the su pilot is busy practicing for an airshow with moves not needed in a dogfight situation the raptor is out in the real world executing actuall missions not just impresing the public.

  • @Inklebonker1 whos at war, and who isn't? please do not start this, and i know im late haha, i just like to comment :) but i still say both are great machines, but F-22 has an advantage over other planes because of stealth, and because of that finding it will take much longer

  • @ScorpionSrokk dont start what?

  • I enjoy watching both aircraft. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. I am by far no expert, however, I do believe it comes down to one single concept. TRAINING. A good plane is no good without TRAINING. Repeated training or "Train like you fight" is the winning stratagy.

  • why don't you guys try and stop crashing your planes at airshows?that would be a good start...

    i'm just poking you around,sukhoi productions kick ass

    but they're not stealth,as far as i know

  • Russia = the best =)

  • the best at what? without natural gas russia=third world country

    Russia is ranked 156 out of 180 countries in corruption

    ranked 71 in quality of life. little Estonia is ranked top 30 in both.

  • @normalais without the russian natural gas, most of the europe third world countries and such would be in deep crap to be honest, and you can blame ukraine (i think i get ukraine and poland mixed up all the time haha dont get me wrong) for that as they dont pay for the gas

  • @ScorpionSrokk without russian natural gas europe will develop alternative energy. without europe buying russian natural gas russia would go back to what it was in 1990s- hell on earth

  • Comment removed

  • you gotta remember the plane is only as good as the pilot in it...and there sure as hell aren't better pilots in russia than the u.s., and dont even try to convince me that russian engineers are better than americans...just way to go in killing a ton of your sub crews in the cold war due to inadequate shielding...and lest we forget chernobyl...WAY TO GO!!!

  • what their comments on the stealth abilities of the F22 does is show their lack of understanding of modern air combat. We have allies that buy or used to buy migs and what not so we know their technology. funny no american pilots ever defect with new equipment. says somthing about where the better place to live is.

  • at 2.00 ...this plane is inpossible to take down

  • because its doing a zero energy manouver? best you learn about air combat. energy is life, speed = energy. you pull that airshow crap in combat and you might as well hit the eject button.

  • I think it is you who needs to learn something about air combat. Yes, speed = energy, but the MiG can pick up speed easily after doing these extreme manoeuvres. Same as the F22. Which will also do these extreme manoeuvres in combat. These "airshow crap" moves are the ones planes like the F22 and SU's WILL use in combat. This fancy SU-27 moves are the only reason the US picked the F22 as their new fighter. Because the F23 wasn't as agile as the F22.

  • This thing can do a cobra. It's that good.

  • so why cant we be friends... why are we sitting here bragging about what country can kill more poeple with there technology??? you people make me sick...

  • bauhahaah

  • Greetings from the EU, SU-37 much better than any American fighter jet!!

  • Aircraft Odds vs. Su-35

    Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor 10.1:1

    Eurofighter Typhoon 4.5:1

    Sukhoi Su-35 "Flanker" 1.0:1

    Dassault Rafale C 1.0:1

    McDonnell Douglas F-15C Eagle 0.8:1

    Boeing F/A-18+ 0.4:1

    McDonnell Douglas F/A-18C 0.3:1

    General Dynamics F-16C 0.3:1

  • Awesome plane! Greetings from Czech Republic.

  • Russian aircraft look good with "slick" moves but technologically they are approximately 25 years behind the USA. Their reliability also sucks.

  • missile tech maybe better but f22 is crap, and f-15, would be down in a sec in a dogfight against su-37

  • f 22 crap? you cant be serious the f 22 could take out the su 37 before the su 37 even knew the f 22 was there thanks to its stealth technology

  • These "invisible technologies" are good only to bomb Iraq. Iraq has no modern radars. In Su-37 great radar, which perfectly F-22 sees. No matter what "invisibility".

  • it only sees it after its already in range of long range missiles. And it "Supposedly sees it"

  • i will believe it when i see it until then i think your full of shit

  • how come people think that AMERICA has the best stuff when actually the russians can make something from 1930 into a machine like the SU-27 or other variants

  • What? that made no sense at all..

  • Su37 - the only jet that can make a 360 degree turn on the same spot.

  • Really? My aren't you uninformed!

  • I love how you commies think you won WW2 singlehandedly/.

    On a side note this aircraft doesn't stand a chance against modern nato/USA aircraft(f22 and f35) I would be surprised if this could take on an f15, american missile technology is far more advanced then what the russians use.

  • this is delightful fiction

  • Amazing aircraft too bad all my life the USA has tried to make Soviet built aircraft look bad, from the mig29 up to this bird these are the best airframes ever designed

  • "Stalin was begging"...

    Stalin was begging in 1941 when germans were seeing the stars of Kremlin!And in 1942 when Hitler nearly took Caucasus!!And in 1943 when the battle of Kursk raged!!!But you came in 1944 not to fight but to take yourself a piece of cake.Who took away germanys secrets Huh?!Who took away 1500 german best engineers during the operation "paperclip"

  • War is a serious business, not some silly game. It was always better to let someone to fight your war for you. It is a smart, practical thing to save lives of your own soldiers/citizens and use some foreign mercenaries to fight your war, this strategy was in use for thousands of years. What is wrong with it?

  • @Brovenosec I BELEAVE WE HELP TO ON THE WESTERN FRONT IF USA WAS NEVER ATTACKED YOU GUYS WOULD HAVE BEEN SCREWED AND SO WOULD US.

  • Comment removed

  • There is no way the brits could have landed on normandy without the U.S. and Canada. We opened the western front for you ruskies. Remember who hitler put on the western front to block the allied invasion. His two best tank commanders. Rommell and Heinz Guderian, He took from the Eastern front to stop the western front. Get real we kept you russians from speaking German, Nuff said.

  • Anyways, The SU is just experimental. not even in production. All this pretty flipping and turning means nothing when you got an AIM9X Sidewinder missile with the same thrust vectoring technology locked on to you. nothing but a showplane. Anyways the F22 would scrap this turd before the SU knew it was even there. SU 37 TERMINATOR? It should be The SU 37 SHOWPLANE.

  • i completely agree brother

  • Both excellent a/c, however I give the F-22 the win for stealth. Unfortunately it has two major drawbacks (like most aircraft), hideous cost and tied to an airfield,it will need to get in the air to be effective.

  • BTW, this video reminds me of the Village People doing "In The Navy"

  • don't these things engage from like 15 miles away...? what maneuvering is to be done? :) (kidding)

  • HA...go ahead and do a COBRA or a BackFlip with a Raptor on your 6 , and see what happens to you..........

    Pretty airshow maneuvers though.......

    until BLAMMMMMMM !!!!!!

  • Just letting you know that when COBRA manuver is performed, the pulse-doppler radar that F-22 uses, loses the Su.

  • The APG-77 AESA radar is not going to "lose" an aircraft just because it goes into a high angle stall......

    A cobra does not make an aircraft invisible........besides , once an AIM locks onto a target...bye, bye !!

    In combat scenarios, the enemy never 'saw' the F22 that just blazed them. So they can do all the cobras and backflips that they want........all the way to the ground........

  • Actually it does. Its been proven by scientists and radar operators: the lock breaks. Pulse-doppler radar "sees" motion. not hovering/stationary air targets. It needs to change its mode to lock on such target. It doesn't totally lose it, just long enough for radar to break lock, also depends on what kind of AIM. Passive, semi-active or active? also depends on wavelength.

    By the way I hope you are saying all this based on proven facts, not just national pride.

  • Spetz....you are correct, but only if the aircraft becomes motionless......or floats, which will only occur for a very short period of time (1-2 seconds) Any motion forward or backwards will give a doppler shift, and be seen by the radar. AESA also has a feature that will anticipate a location based on where the target was last located. Also the Pulse Doppler is only one facet of the AESA capability. IR sensors are also used in positioning location.

  • Spetsnazovets, the F-22 uses an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radar. Pulse Doppler is old news for this bird. The F-22 is more technologically advanced than the Su-37 without a doubt.

  • O HAI 1980'S

  • yep! the supreme of all planes in the world

  • "Raptor killer"...that's cute, in a sad hilarious kind of way

  • If Canada ever gets invaded - I will laugh my azz off! You Socialist Canuck F'ers; we won't lift a finger for you a holes.

  • Unlike America, no one hates us enough to invade us. Plus, as members of NATO, you have an obligation to lift much more than a finger to help us.

    Thanks douchebag,

    Krovi

  • another example of why the world hates americans.

    sadly, i am one.

  • Ok Cliiifffff, at the risk of sounding to arrogant, I'll lay some FACTS on you:... The United States Navy has a capacity greater than that of the next 17 largest combined navies. Currently, it has 342,000 personnel on active duty and 1,290,634 in reserve; 276 ships and over 4,000 aircraft. Its budget was to be $127.3 billion for 2007.

  • thaaaank you, wikipedia.

  • ...yeah, I see your point: Russia DOES have "by far the best navy in the world"...douchebag

  • iim still not denying or even acknowledging your "facts"

  • My facts are real...unlike yours they come from the real world, in this discussion your repeated failure to accept these facts has led me to conclude that you're in denial...either that or you're delusional...have fun in the clouds buddy

  • no, your facts aren't real. they come from wikipedia which can be edited by anyone. if i wanted to i could "make" say.... chile's navy the strongest in the world.

  • I didn't even go to wiki...I got my info from globalsecurity, US Navy, Rusnavy and others...

  • Too bad the Su-37 is an experimental aircraft, and will never see production. The Su-47 will never see production either.

    The only real contender for the F-22/F-35 is the PAK-FA, but that won't see production until the 2015-2020 time frame. That's plenty of time for our pilots to hone their tactics to fight against other 5th generation aircraft. We've been matching F-22's up against each other for years now. The Russians are still struggling to even make their 1st 5th generation aircraft.

  • This aircraft is good but the pilots are Russian schlugheads so its ok

  • Your title is a fucking joke. Good luck shooting what you can't see, let alone keep up with.

  • so you think america is the best in power? then why yall never mess with URRS ? because yall know who to mess with ha , yall know russia can destroy america on one on one we all know that america has always be afraid of russia lool

  • Yeah! Russia's military is totally not almost in as bad a shape as their economy! They totally have a huge navy with lots of transports and spend tons of money on military research! Oh wait... those are all lies.

    Honestly, all Russia has going for it is that huge stockpile of nuclear missiles they can't even keep track of that they built when they had a semi-competent economy (read: bloated and stagnant).

    In 25 to 50 years when long-range lasers are developed, even that will be obsolete.

  • I would honestly like to see a WWIII, and watch as america would kick everyone elses' ass. Do some research too..America is the best country. Look at the facts. and if it werent for us Japan would have control of china, germany would have take over europe, and communism would be spread throughout the rest of the world. Not saying communism is a bad thing, but it still wouldnt be good.

  • You are the stupidest fuck ever!!! I am not even going to tell you why america had maybe 15% impact on victory in WWII

    if it was not for heroicsof all russian people the world whould have been nazi now!

  • thats very true but the heroics would have all failed if the US did not open up the second front

    russia would have lost if the US did not intervene

  • its no doubt the US helped us alot. But it was more land-lease and weapons, and food that helped us. Also US bombing raids of german factories. Not so much the second front, since it was in 1944, and Russia was obliterating Germany by then. Nevertheless, R.I.P.

  • ARE YOU FUCKING OUT OF YOUR GOD DAMN MIND

    the US along with Britain and Canada but mostly the US invaded france forcing germany to split HALF its forces i say again HALF its forces to the second front

    this is what stalin was begging for and we gave it to him with out the US Russia would have been fucked up the asshole

  • wow chill the fuck out douchebag.

  • im sorry your just so fucking stupid

  • 80% of Axis forces were destroyed on the eastern front, well known fact.

  • Japan and Italy were Axis and who got rid of them? America in the pacific against the Japs,And U.S. Canada and Britain paradropped into Greece eventually liberating Italy. And your on here talking 80% destroyed in the eastern front? Your a fucking retard. Go put a gun to your head and pull the trigger.

  • @lynx29 German Soldiers but we inflicted more material losses

  • "HALF its forces i say again HALF"-HALF?!

    I always knew that americans were an idiots but not to a such extent! Here I have a history book:

    On an Eastern front 507 out of 587 german divisions which invaded russia were destroyed.100 divisions were destroyed by allies.Out of 100000 planes lost by Luftwaffe 77000 were destroyed by Red

    army.Learn history and math,stupid fuck!

  • Allies opened a second front in 1944 when no one needed it.They simply were afraid that Red Army would gain more experience and control the whole Europe.Allies couldnt fight well anyway-remember Ardennes when exhausted,half consisting of youngsters and old people germans started an offensive and americans pissed in they pants.Russians had to save them by Balaton operation

  • "thats very true but the heroics would have all failed"-that just d mean that the war would end in 1946 and than we d control all of the europe.Techincs you supplied us was a pile of junk carrying away RUSSIAN lives not yours by the way!The only good thing you had was studebecker-Big deal,anyway

  • I'd bet the F-22 is better, but shit, they are both very cool.

  • Since the F-22 will be very likely to carry a laser DEW(2010+) in addition to its integrated DEW capability. What difference does it make to pull 9G, somersault or any other airshow stunt when the weapon firing at you is moving at light speed and can be fired in a 120+ degree arc! Also since no plane in the world is likely to even know an F-22 is in the air, why would it be manuvering? Should the F-22 decline combat for some reason. How is the SU-37 going to pursue it?

  • The su has slow speed supermaneuverability,and the f/a-22 has 99% of the same slow speed ability,but also has high speed supermaneuverability. The su doesnt have the same high speed abilties.

  • are u kidding me? yes its a production planethey have made over 700 thousand becuase they are so cheap to make. fucking dumbass. and 0/700 have crashed, do ur research.

  • come on now canada never accomplished anything except help liberate france in ww2.

  • I know, exept help out other countries do what they need to do. but us never did anyhting.

  • LOL Who wnats to be an American pussy and get there ass blown out of the sky while they are still sitting in the inferior F-22.

  • wow you sound like a moron just so you know stupid the F22 is the best plane in the world...and america...the best country in the world...dumbass

  • LOL If everyone in the world saw you say that you would be raped so hard JIZZ would be flowing out your mouth, ears, eyes and nouse. Every country hates America. And even the AV88 Harrier could rape the F-22.

  • Yeah! Because a single F-22 totally didn't rape a squadron of F-15 eagles, a plane that completely annihilated every single aircraft (Russian or otherwise) it ever met in combat and was never shot down! Oh wait... that's a lie.

    Stealth, mach 2.4 max speed, thrust vectoring, and the longest ranged radar in the air. The SU-37 MIGHT stand a tiny chance in a dogfight (if the electronic countermeasures allowed it to lock on)... but we all know dogfights don't happen anymore anyway.

  • you know nothing then many forigner who hate the u.s. are afraid of the f-22 euro fighter on the other hand is crap.

  • in this day and age they are showing off turning capabilities.

    It is the electronics and weapons system that will win.

    Still Dog fighting?

    try dodging missiles that come at you several times the speed of a bullet.

  • lol try locking onto somehting that won;t let you. haha!

  • yea like F22, you can't even see it on radar to lock on haha!