Could we stay private and enforce transparency as for damages are concerned. Or the object of corner, concern as damages is the dam of ages. And don’t touch to my pushy cat.
who do you want adhere, if it is not this exact rue rule threatened by OTHERs if you don't work at establishing freedom, bridges, and barriers.
Whci ch rules or manifest for privacy. Privacy then without private property within the common spaces?
As private ownership permit sovereignty and free appreciation, where would be the island if under a all commonspaces where privacy and individual freedom, and individualization or particularization (but not particularism) (and why not free like an atom- em {aim} ota (iota){hot or remove in french} d be under assassination,
also not taking into account in the discourse of social is the nature of man, man centred though, without its universe, without being united and talkde in term of dissensiton, its shadow or absence, death, emptiness and impertience.
Mclellan, d. (1990) because basically everyone is talking about the social over which they theorized as good sheep and never about economy, main concern of marx prevailing over the politics as the latter being dependend of the former.
the weapon of criticism cannot, of course, supplant the criticism of weapons.
a society of pure morality, to produce in knowing that our means of production are depletion will ensure a culture and mentality of seduction, adduction, addiction, destruction and immorality. Whate veer would be the rules they would be eviction, viciated . about priviledge and for distortion theft tacit threat and felons.
would be solidarising long in case of a ‘prisoner dilemma context.
As and it is what I reproach you, the solidarity,that no one is taking the subject of communism, and in fact you are not communist by any means but social liquidity, is about the resources. You can have any rules of equity and justice, jury, fair trial, constitution, diplomacy, whatever filing and field of theorization if there is no more resources, only if we would have been brought up and self build up
They are groups assemble on some unofficial occasion, they are fluids and then unleash from debates, yes but also from results and work and cohesion- as well as responsibilisat ion.
In addition, they are groups under who? Lead by who, yes but crush or supervise or block by who?
It d be interesting to know in front o fthe police, the power holder, the police of anywhere, none immune against becoming the Gestapo,
even thought we need them against the worse thatn in practise or office already
Quote #3 RE: Video: Police, Power and Protests - Nina Power and Lindsey German — yoyo 2011-12-26 17:08
also on solidarity movement and their psychology
also on solidarity movement and their psychology it is highly ugly that the solidarity appearance is high as there is no ngo organizational issues, orders, comments, epistemology and ontology questions.
great follow up on psychological police presence, taking over the streets and fencing attak on the organised crimes adn absence of legitimacy (hand in hand with the whole judiciary and other chambers and powers).
though the form of action solidarity running the place without policy is militia social and if is not altogether will be.
as well if dr power could stop saying 'you know' cos people will judge and will get stuck with this rythme while there is so many stuffing in her discourse that in fact we did not know...then
confidentiality might be used because of setting up and retaliation or double penalty. the truth and all the truth is a grave problem in any system of justice, included the hypothetical equity.
and on common space owns by the companies, owning the data recorded on cctv...and the way to interprete them as well as their context is more than frightening but delibitation.
Our "leaders" have failed us badly, we are not becoming, we are a police state of revenue collectors and bullies, thugs and criminal gangs operating in uniform who are just following orders to protect politicians corporate greed ,the police need to be changed and realise who and what they are when the uniform is not worn
Great discussion, this is what is missing from ‘mainstream TV’ thanks for this post. This platform of information/discussion needs to be promulgated to the country to give a balance of what is actually occurring as opposed to what ‘spin docs’ provides to media.
Comment removed
Jatspage 2 months ago
exclusion as the form of surveillance.
elevatwell 2 months ago
because me i tell you something, i am not gonna get ready to live under occupation.
elevatwell 2 months ago
Could we stay private and enforce transparency as for damages are concerned. Or the object of corner, concern as damages is the dam of ages. And don’t touch to my pushy cat.
who do you want adhere, if it is not this exact rue rule threatened by OTHERs if you don't work at establishing freedom, bridges, and barriers.
elevatwell 2 months ago
Whci ch rules or manifest for privacy. Privacy then without private property within the common spaces?
As private ownership permit sovereignty and free appreciation, where would be the island if under a all commonspaces where privacy and individual freedom, and individualization or particularization (but not particularism) (and why not free like an atom- em {aim} ota (iota){hot or remove in french} d be under assassination,
Atone
elevatwell 2 months ago
also not taking into account in the discourse of social is the nature of man, man centred though, without its universe, without being united and talkde in term of dissensiton, its shadow or absence, death, emptiness and impertience.
solidarity or liquidity.???
elevatwell 2 months ago
Mclellan, d. (1990) because basically everyone is talking about the social over which they theorized as good sheep and never about economy, main concern of marx prevailing over the politics as the latter being dependend of the former.
the weapon of criticism cannot, of course, supplant the criticism of weapons.
weep. marx.
elevatwell 2 months ago
a society of pure morality, to produce in knowing that our means of production are depletion will ensure a culture and mentality of seduction, adduction, addiction, destruction and immorality. Whate veer would be the rules they would be eviction, viciated . about priviledge and for distortion theft tacit threat and felons.
elevatwell 2 months ago
would be solidarising long in case of a ‘prisoner dilemma context.
As and it is what I reproach you, the solidarity,that no one is taking the subject of communism, and in fact you are not communist by any means but social liquidity, is about the resources. You can have any rules of equity and justice, jury, fair trial, constitution, diplomacy, whatever filing and field of theorization if there is no more resources, only if we would have been brought up and self build up
elevatwell 2 months ago
They are groups assemble on some unofficial occasion, they are fluids and then unleash from debates, yes but also from results and work and cohesion- as well as responsibilisat ion.
In addition, they are groups under who? Lead by who, yes but crush or supervise or block by who?
It d be interesting to know in front o fthe police, the power holder, the police of anywhere, none immune against becoming the Gestapo,
elevatwell 2 months ago
even thought we need them against the worse thatn in practise or office already
Quote #3 RE: Video: Police, Power and Protests - Nina Power and Lindsey German — yoyo 2011-12-26 17:08
also on solidarity movement and their psychology
also on solidarity movement and their psychology it is highly ugly that the solidarity appearance is high as there is no ngo organizational issues, orders, comments, epistemology and ontology questions.
elevatwell 2 months ago
great follow up on psychological police presence, taking over the streets and fencing attak on the organised crimes adn absence of legitimacy (hand in hand with the whole judiciary and other chambers and powers).
elevatwell 2 months ago
though the form of action solidarity running the place without policy is militia social and if is not altogether will be.
as well if dr power could stop saying 'you know' cos people will judge and will get stuck with this rythme while there is so many stuffing in her discourse that in fact we did not know...then
Quote #2 commonality — yoyo 2011-12-26 16:25
elevatwell 2 months ago
1 commonality — yoyo 2011-12-26 16:21
confidentiality might be used because of setting up and retaliation or double penalty. the truth and all the truth is a grave problem in any system of justice, included the hypothetical equity.
and on common space owns by the companies, owning the data recorded on cctv...and the way to interprete them as well as their context is more than frightening but delibitation.
elevatwell 2 months ago
Our "leaders" have failed us badly, we are not becoming, we are a police state of revenue collectors and bullies, thugs and criminal gangs operating in uniform who are just following orders to protect politicians corporate greed ,the police need to be changed and realise who and what they are when the uniform is not worn
19loch 2 months ago
Great discussion, this is what is missing from ‘mainstream TV’ thanks for this post. This platform of information/discussion needs to be promulgated to the country to give a balance of what is actually occurring as opposed to what ‘spin docs’ provides to media.
19loch 2 months ago 4