9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK - INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS

[waterchildtera]

because your data does not miror the phyical facts and pictures

its made up and does not explane anything relivent

[721508]

waterchildtera. the guy is an expert in his field. what people must do is realise that 99.9% of youtubers are not experts.

[russellfarina]

so where did the two engines go? now lets do some real investigating!

[721508]

russellfarina. there was a video 'zembla' which youtube removed and was linked in my info box. What the video showed was two experts from denmark, both pilots, who confirmed that the engines found at the crash site belonged to the crashed jet. The people who had it removed have deprived you from seeing it.

[Laysoles]

@russellfarina 1-They did find it in a bunch of pieces

2-You are a complete idiot if you think those engines will be intact after a crash such as this.

By all means throw up your redundant statement about how we should "do some real investigating" when it has already been done.

Idiot.

[721508]

Laysoles. there was a video which showed pictures of the engines and were examined by experts and confirmed as the type used by these airliners. what is sad is the mass flagging by the conspiracy crowd who helped get the video removed.

[rapartist43]

9/11 conspiracy theories are bullshit!!!

[jizzmonger]

The term "Truther" is an oxymoron.

Those that question Perdue's analysis didn't even graduate High School.

[scorchxd]

721508-good luck with the "truthers"-any evidence that doesn't support their argument is fake, and the presenter a "shill"(in your case, a "military counterintelligence operative".

[721508]

scorchxd. I know. i get paid handsomely for this! lol!

[DaveDepraved]

the fact you think a jumbo jet penetrated that far into the pentagon is very sad. popular mechanics would probably hire you?

independent from what? logic?

[721508]

DaveDepraved. Its what experts think. are you one!

[Elhardt]

The problem with this simulation is that if you look at the real video footage you'll notice that the plane appears to blow up in front of the Pentagon, not inside the building. There is also airplane debris from the front of the plane spread out in front of the Pentagon, like the part that has the "C" letter on it.

[721508]

point No.1 if something impacts and penetrates a building which it did in this case there would be an inside and outside ejection of the burning fuel. point No.2 the letter 'c' found outside could well have been torn off on its way in.

[PYTHAGORAS101]

D.U is a waste product of nuclear reactors and currently

used  by military because for its hardness,

(and other reasons???)

It's a absurd notion that it would be used for ballast and mechanics

[721508]

PYTHAGORAS101. obsurd to you but not to the military and commercial airlines. I can see why it pisses you off because yiou think you have something with the D.U. at the pentagon crash thus linking a missile.

[721508]

for fuck sake research. i copy and pasted this from a 1984 memo.

FAA Advisory Circular 20-123, dated 12/20/84 is entitled "Avoiding or Minimizing Encounters With Aircraft Equipped With Depleted Uranium Balance Weights During Accident Investigations." The two-page memo was written to warn FAA crash site investigators that, as a result of an air crash, DU weights in various parts of the aircraft might have had their cadmium plating removed.

[721508]

The memorandum states "While the depleted uranium normally poses no danger, it is to be handled with caution. The main hazard associated with depleted uranium is the harmful effect the material could have if it enters the body. If particles are inhaled or digested, they can be chemically toxic and cause a significant and long-lasting irradiation of internal tissue."

[PYTHAGORAS101]

How does a aluminium plane punch a perfectly round hole,

14 feet wide, through 6 rungs of the pentagon ,made of

3 foot steel reinforced concrete walls?

Smoking gun = D.U. missile?

[721508]

PYTHAGORAS101. D.U. missile. No! Why? D.U. is found on airliners. a crashed 747 in europe in 1992 had on board 1500kg of D.U. which was used as counterweights and in the controls, wings, rudders etc. the whole area was poisoned along with people. i'm not a physics expert but if your suggesting the hole is by a missile you'd have to prove that. you'd also have to explain witnesses to the strike who saw the plane impact!

[PYTHAGORAS101]

I've never heard of the use of highly radio active D.U

used in commercial aircraft (why poison passengers)

or counter balance measures required for aircraft

(why not use lead)

Just because 1 planes cargo had D.U. doesn't mean all have.

[721508]

PYTHAGORAS101. it was news to me that D.U. is used to but i don't build aircraft. the D.U. would only be dangerous if the plane crashed as happened. a large area was contaminated along with people. it is only now the info has been released. the D.U. was not cargo. somebody with greater aircraft knowledge than me would have to explain why D.U. and not any other material.

[DaveDepraved]

no the burden is on the official story which you've swallowed hook line and sinker. you're right about not being a physics expert though.

are you an orangatang? (sorry orangatangs)

[721508]

DaveDepraved. Your no expert and neither am i. I go along with the official story because the kind of stuff you people spout is 99.9% B.S. 'Alex Jones, September clues!' LMFAO!

[721508]

DaveDepraved. sorry mate i didn't realise you were a hippy. nuff said.

[sicfukc]

Yeah, and does this explain the depleted uranium, on sight at the pentagon. I'm sure a boeing 757 contains lots of that substance eh misinformist?

[721508]

sicfukc. i know 747's contain 1500kg of DU which are used as counterweights it is used in flight controls in the tail, rudder and wings. i'll assume without checking that the 757 also does.

[PYTHAGORAS101]

721508 You are a military counter intelligence operative.

(a bull shit artist) am i right?.

or your a victim of military propaganda (bullshit).

Commercial craft don't' have D.U

[721508]

PYTHAGORAS101. It is you who is the bullshitter my friend. i've got better things to do than research for you!

[giorgio69er]

"Boeing has never used DU on either the 757 or the 767, and we no longer use it on the 747," Leslie M. Nichols, product spokesperson for Boeing's 767, told AFP. "Sometime ago, we switched to tungsten, because it is heavier, more readily available and more cost effective."

-American Free Press

[721508]

giorgio69er. a crashed 747 in canada released DU when it crashed. maybe officially DU is not supposed to be used but nevertheless it is being used. i put the link in the info box top right.

[giorgio69er]

Yeah, that was in Halifax back in '04, so in 2001 they probably were using it, they admit it on the 747, but deny ever using any on the 757 and 767's. Wouldn't surprise me if they did though, great way to dispose of toxic waste, lol.

[721508]

giorgio69er. my guess is it is widely used.

[ThemowofChow]

pffftttt where are the holes from the engines? Where ARE the engines? Where's the tale section?

What was in the big box that the agents had to cover up to carry out? It certainly wasn't bodies so what was it?

The engines metal cant be melted by Jet Fuel so where are they?

[721508]

ThemowofChow. parts of the jet had come off. at least one engine had come off and landed next to a ladies car. most of the jet would have disintegrated on impact i should imagine. if you know of covered boxes why don't you know what they are as you suggest them as some sort of evidence. do covered boxes make any difference?

[DkEugen]

Good vidio, I'm not sure if that's how it really went down, but its good nonetheless.

[RonaldDumbsfeld]

I had the opportunity to see the Pentagon after the attack. Even though the fire was raging and the roof had collapsed the hole was clearly shaped like an airplane. The diameter of the fuselage of a 757 matched the hole punched into the building. If it wasn't the airplane, where did the plane and the passengers go?

[721508]

CrazedLeper. IT WAS INDEPENDANT RESEARCH NUMBSKULL!

[CrazedLeper]

More cartoons? I'll believe the *real* evidence, thank you.

[721508]

mevisface. if you listen to the explination, which you clearly haven't it tells you that the fuel did most of the damage not the plane. they would have had to take into account the speed and angle at which the plane came to make an analysis, they can't just fabricate it! if your going to comment watch the video first!

[mevisface]

How come this video shows the wings going into the building incorrectly? The side of the pentagon still had the windows intact after the collision. If the wings went in the way it is shown, the windows should be broken. What about the concrete walls? All I see is concrete pilars in this example. Even a mevis face can poke holes at this animation.