A point about these devices is that technically their not considered over-unity because they need a power source to amplify. Generator is more accurate. In terms of practicality of this specific generator, It could technically be replicated at a much larger scale for one to use to charge batteries being used by a house. havent seen a vid on that! Though there are some vids here that show multi-battery set-ups using a bendini generator. I still have doubts about the charge ability of these.proof?
DeadJack57 is correct. I appreciate you showing input volts and amps vs output volts and amps, but I would encourage you to put an oscilloscope on your output. I suspect you will see a spikey output which will give you erroneous readings on a multimeter. The capacitor alone will not give you a perfectly flat, noiseless dc output.
this shits bad ass man. All done in a garage with house hold resources. All the naysayers or whatever can suck your dick my friend. I hope you drop that load all of their faces. This might come as a surprise to some of you but part of science is experimentation. Raise your hand if you think the gasoline engine worked the first time.... with limited resources. I would love to see you raise it.
Dude, you are still hooked up to a battery. Try producing current without a power supply like Tessla talked about in a vaccuum in the form of radient energy.
Try it on non-rechargable batteries (with caution of course because heat and explosion is a possibility). It is a fun surprise. Also a good circuit for electrolysis or anodizing metal in solution more evenly.
Why not demonstrate this device in a more practical way?
Why not power some form of device with this thing, and then power another just with a battery, and run them together. If the device make the battery last twice as long while doing the same amount of work, then that would demonstrate that it works.
Or why not run the output into the input and disconnect he battery?
@sagarat Considering that it actually recharges batteries faster than DC current, I would have to say it does something useful, even more so that once you disconnect it the voltage continues to rise - very novel. The fact that he is using a very large cap filter further proves that it is reading constant current. I have an associates in EE and Rick's demo kit to play around with. Nice try.
@sagarat In fact, it can even recharge multiple batteries to equal voltage from a single battery. This is even more novel, considering it can be fed from a solar panel with constant voltage. This is the area it gets even more over-unity, with 100% free energy from the solar panel. That's what happens when you hook your circuit up to nature, it pays you back tenfold.
What you're doing is exactly what the Power Co's do to bring power into your home.
You have just created a transformer.
Most people think the power coming into their homes is from the power Co's source, this is not true. The power is induced at the pole in the transformer with an induction coil.
really great work.. definitely not a naysayer, but i think maybe instead of bashing you they should have just pointed out the voltage across your load is necessary to determine the output watts, also taking into consideration the load must be calculated according to your resistance for a "proper" reading which is all impossible IMO anyways... i say who cares as long as the batts are swappable. your vids helped me get started on the bedini too so thanks man =)
have you used a scope or a filter on the input? the digital meters are notorious for poor filtering above 10 hz. and that babies running at quite a bit. input is a major pulse not a smooth flow.
This is not over unity get your facts strait, supply a schematic, get some real data on the pulsed current, You are fooling yourself with the readings you are getting, because the meter you are using, and the way you are using it, is not by far, an accurate way of measuring the actual energy consumed or delivered by the circuit. Please consult an engineer get him to do the tests and if he still finds that your circuit is over unity, we will kiss your ... :)
I'd like to see this experiment repeated with the voltage drop measured across a shunt to determine the current. It is the most accurate method I know of to measure current.
I think the real test, though, is to get it started with the battery then feed the output back into the device and see if it keeps running. If you are, in fact getting 63% more power out than you are putting in as your numbers suggest it should be no problem and the motor should run until the bearings wear out.
Free energy can change the world!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
Good. About time you stood up and told these people here to go take a flying phuhckkkkk!. Magnets and collapsing fields go hand and hand like adam and eve.
Power loss. Power in is - then power out. All you have shown is a lack of understanding how to calculate power. you get a A for effort and mechanics but an F for physics and math. I would be very embarrassed if I was you.
Not that I'm knocking your efforts here, so keep up the good work. Just wanted to point out one thing. You disconnected the wire and ran the current through the ammeter to try and measure the amperage. This is wrong, as you want to leave the wires connected and just touch the ammeter probes to either end of the operating wire. That will give you an accurate ammeter reading. Pushing the load through the meter gives you an inaccurate reading, and usually burns out meters. ;)
Notice as soon as he disconnected the battery the light went out, even though his motor was still turning. That in itself proves the current to light the lamp comes from the battery. or the lamp would have stayed lit when battery disconnected and the motor was turning it would have kept the lamp lit except the lamp current comes from the battery. Also notice he is such a genius he cant keep amps and volts in order
@22crazyhelen gay my ass you stupid jerk. I was running my transistor radio on solar cells before this guys dad was born. And I am here to tell you this is a pile of crap read my post about it, simple diagnosis, your the gay one not to mention the stupid assed one.
Those who say it can't be done should stay out of the way of the ones doing it. People get so worked up and angry over this stuff. I'm willing to bet most, if not all of the naysayers on here have never actually tried it and if they did, it was to try and disprove this technology, so of course they started out biased. Much respect to those who share their research freely instead of hoarding it to try and make a buck. :-)
Every thing in this world is theory. Nothing is set in stone. Some day someone will do something that goes against mans laws of physics then again will will have to change the law. 1800's people were told that going over 60 MPH would peel your face off. Today people travel at 17000 MPH yet there face don't peel off. Interesting.
@jotacril where the hell did those laws come from? "What, are you f*king 2?
Do you actually think that Horton Heard a Who?
Do you still think that Santa brings you gifts?
That Michael Jackson didnt have facelifts?...science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief may be preserved..."
sounds to me like those laws are bad science from someone a little too close to the spanish inquisition.
People who don't know the laws of physics, are going to be the ones who break them. Joe Schmoe in his garage will be the first to power his home on a drop of water. Kinda like the guy who discovered the formula for the tiles on the space shuttle. No degrees in chemistry just mixed some crap together and here ya go.
So , it appears as though more power is coming out than goes in.
I suggest to modify either the running or output coils so that the output voltage is higher than the input voltage. This is needed for the unit to feed itself and recharge its own battery. If this can be achieved and demonstrated, I will personally fund further development.
@stupidbabyg Someone like what you described recently invented a supersteel 7% stronger than regular and tougher than some titaniums. Google: Gary Cola- Flash Bainite. He was a DIYer like this. Stay optimistic Stupidbabyq *thumb-up*
Its a joke that energy cannot be created from "nothing", the same people that stop these things (genuine-run-your-house-on-things) from going commercial are the same people that earn the majority of money in the world by supplying electricity and other fuel to you. All over the world electricity poles fall down and start bush fires destroying peoples houses and lives, and they say "Oh sorry we're not sure about our procedures we'll double check them next time".
thats a prison you guys live in, you pay for any Fuel out there, an if there is an device that would let oyu break off this prison, do you realy think that the gov would allow that?
I am challenging you to actually take this unit out into your driveway, and without all the wires and junk on your bench..... hand start this machine without the battery, and produce more ACTUAL energy than you are using.....Stop with the smoke and mirrors and make it work without false readings from your digimeter.....Lets see that one !! Bet you can't do it......LOL
Do any of you who back up this S$%t really believe that there is more energy coming out of this setup than is going in ?? You ALL failed junior high school science didn't you !!! If this is REAL.....then we can confidently pass up all of our problems, and just move straight into space!!
so who the fock would allow you to do so? Huh? wo the fok will allow you to get out of control from industri? who the fok will allow you to cut off billions from industri? tell me who?
u good and thax for doing something good. don't listen the people who saying it's not truth. they may work for tha oil company. of course they don't want to see things like yours. thinkabout the oil busnisse. it's a largest business on earth. more than guns, more than drugs! so keep doing what u do
what is peoples problem.... this guy is doing something to try to help the world! and what are you doing? spending time just putting him down.... sure it might not be perfect but he's trying. if everyone was like this guy we would probably have a perfect energy supply by now...
Hmmm,,,Using P=EI,,,12.15 x .068 = .826Watts usage,,,,,and produced,,,7.7 x .170ma = 1.309 Watts,,,,WOW,,, Over Unity!,,,Producing More Than You Use,,,But is that the total usage from BOTH Batteries 68ma??? You have to sure you are really getting totals and that you are reading the meters right,,I notice yoy make a mistake in the beginning calling .068 milliamps, millivolts,,so do you have any electronics training or are you guessing???
Those VOMs are only accurate when measuring either sinusoidal AC or DC current. Since the current is pulsing, your current value is wrong.
You need to put in a small series resistor, and use a fast oscilloscope to measure the current spike from the battery. Then integrate over one period to find the actual current.
This is typical of pulsed circuits when mixed with VOMs, and why Newman and Bedini like them, because it allows them to make bad measurements in their favor.
The energy in the bulb seems to be coming from the secondary coil which seems to be driven by a pulse through the primary coil connected to the battery. Without the battery the system seems to stop dead. If the alternator can generate enough current then the system should work without the battery once it gets up to speed.
My theory is the magnets are inducing emf in the coils making an otherwise inefficient motor more efficient. In other words the output is closer to 100% effeciency of the system than the power in. The power in side of the circuit loses power through friction, resistance in the bearings etc... the output side has none of those losses to consider and is therefore more effcient.
RupertsCrystals, check out the free energy research documents by T.E. Bearden. Knowing what exactly what is happening is great, but that won't make this device more or less efficient, dig? To paraphrase Beardens writings, all electric circuits draw energy from the quantum vacuum, only the way that we have learned to design our circuits uses half of the energy we receive to shut down the flow of energy from the quantum vacuum. Pulsing a circuit at the right frequency saves the day.
If the light bulb was powered by the motor, why did it instantly go out when you disconnected the battery, despite the motor still moving just as fast as when you disconnected it?
IF this device truley works as claimed....then I would guess you are right.....If the energy was coming from the magnetic coil...then it would be draining it.....The free energy devices that I have seen that seem to be legit seem to suck energy from nothing (as in ZP energy). Many of the more legit sounding ones indeed seem to do this using some kind of magnetic field fluxing at a resonance of some sort. Of course I dont know if this device is realy doing this, I would have to study it.
there is a lot of mystery around ZP energy but I think the extra energy is coming from the magnets. Magnets are like crude permanent batteries continuously charged from the ether by their atom arrangement and their electron spin... elecricity is like a condensed form of magnetism.
It may be possible of course....however if it is possible to suck energy from a magnet then it would not be any more useufull than a regular battery....since energy cannot be made or destroyed you would end up depleting the magnets energy and it would just get weaker and weaker...running out as a battery does...However if by resonating the flux(or whatever) the Magnet sucks energy in from the ZP field around it....then it would be virtualy inexhaustable.....
Under normal conditions a magnet will last a very long time......however, since energy cannot be created or destroyed only changed in form, if you were to take energy from a magnet in some fashion....then you would be depleting it and it would indeed run out. However....IF you can get the mag to somehow suck in more energy from ZP....then it will not be using up its own energy. A magnet does not "use" energy when it moves a piece of metal...the metal is only finding equilibrium in D mag field
the energy in a magnet comes form its atoms and electrons, they are continuously being brought into a state of charge by the radiant energy of the universe... I think to say "zero point" energy is a misunderstanding of the principles. A magnet does not use energy it gives energy to a coil of wire for example which is simply capturing its free flowing electromagnetic fields. A very long time is a VERY LONG TIME lol
No I think you are misunderstanding the concepts behind magnetism and how it can make electric current flow in a wire. A magnet can only make current flow in a wire if if that magnetic field is fluxing in some fashion. A magnet sitting next to a coil will not cause current to flow in a coil. The magnet field has to be moving...this is why Generators generally spin a magnet in the presence of a coil to work. Otherwise an electromagnet can be turned off and on or flipped{continued in sep response}
A magnet sitting next to a coil will induce current in the coil but it is too weak to measure. I have diagrams of permanent batterys made from stationary magnets and coils showing measureable current flow. NO mechanical energy!
The energy comes form what you might call "zero point" but the term is just a generalisation of a misunderstanding. The energy comes from the atoms and electrons which are continuously charged by the radiant energy of our solar sun.
Zero Point energy is taken seriously by most physcicists: there's a lot of good math behind the theory. Basically there is a sea of Energy around us even in an absolute vaccume. Read up on it....it is quite fascinating and has been proven to the satisfaction of most physcicists. The problem is tapping into it. Many of the credible looking magnet based OVRUNTY dev. seem to tap this by fluxing the mag at resonance (among other possibilities). this is based on real physics. On what R yours based?
Well actually ZP energy was first proposed by Einstein....and since then the theory has indeed been proven with observable results such as the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift. Theories also suggest that ZP energy is responsible for explaining the speculative positive values of the proposed cosmological constant. So the theory is in good standing for sure. Do the ideas you subscribe to propose any effects which have been observed by scientists? Or has there been any other verifiable results?
for sure LOL theories are theories! No-one has knowingly tapped ZP energy! There is ALWAYS a cause behind an affect... I happen to agree, energy exists throughout the universe on a level so small and of a magnitude so great we can only begin to comprehend the idea with the expression "zero point". To me it is like trying to rationalise God's Mind... where do thoughts come from? Can you measure them? Do they have cause and affect? Does this make them real or unreal accord. to your science?
I do not know this is the case, but maybe on a quantum level where weirdness is the natural order of things...sure why not. By your admission these are much too small to even be measured let alone cause any actual work to be done. the energy to do work still has to come from SOMEWHERE...and there would not be enough energy in a magnet to even be measured on its own. Hence fluxing the mag field through mechanical (or other)action is only way to get workable E....a mag is the means not the source.
{here is my continuation from my past reply} an electromagnet can be turned off and on or flipped which will cause the same effect as a spinning (or just moving) magnet. A magnet does not give energy to a coil....it simply transfers mechanical energy from the movement of its field to electrical energy, just as many other process do (for instance pyroelectric with heat...or piezoelectric when hiting a crystal....energy can never be created or destroyed....it can transform and move though
I don't think mechanical energy is transformed into electrical energy directly. When hitting a piezo crystal for example you are compressing the structure and releasing electrical energy from the atomic arrangement. The mechanical energy is just the force needed to induce that effect. With magnets the coil is capturing electrons which are not condensed sufficiently when the magnet is stationary. Moving the magnet thru the coil allows more of the electrons to be captured from the magnetic field.
Actually it is...and it is even reverseable.....by sending an electrical pulse into a crystal you get mechanical motion....
Same with a magnet. sending electricity through a coil will cause the magnet to spin.....
Its a good clue that you are simply transforming energy since it can be reversed back and forth...
What of pyroelectric devices...with two different metals are heated and that heat is changed into electrical energy. Dont mistake elec charge for energy, this is ur mistake perhaps?
with pyro. the two metals have dissimilar atomic structures. When heated one structure expands more than the other creating a potential difference in the atoms electrical charge. Of course electrical charge is energy! Energy being the "potential to do work". What mistake lol
It is like pushing a domino into a bowl of water and creating a splash, the energy of the push is not transformed into a splash although at a subatomic level it might look like it. One is just causing a reaction in the other.
From your other replies you seem to have a veiw of energy as something which almost comes into existance magicaly and is replenished magically. Rather than something which simply transforms from one form to the other...You also seem to be confusing the nature of energy and electricity. All energy is simply the equalization of an imbalance. Through this movement work can be done.
No the energy comes form sources you are unaware of, I never said it was magical, that is your rationalisation of something you cannot explain. In your terms electricity is an imbalance it wants to reach equilibrium with any node that has less charge than itself. Like you said thru this transfer of energy is the ability to cause work to be done, even if it does not "do" the work itself... a magnet is continuously charged by the radiant energy the driving force behind the physical universe.
I think in order to bring new understanding into your equation you are going to need some new theories to think about, would you like me to suggest some reading material? lol science does love to be challenged with new ways of thinking...
Im always willing to read new Ideas even if I may not agree with them (I try to stay open minded.....just not so open my brain falls out....yeah I know thats an old joke...but its accurate! LOL) Nothing makes me happier than challenging my knowledge....& I dont even mind finding out that Im wrong......(if it were to ever happen I mean LOL)<----yeah Im joking :)
cool, there isn't right or wrong technically, there are just models of understanding, each new model surpasses the old model integrating the old way at the same time! when I get a minute I will send you some links and we can have a meeting of minds LOL regards :)
Like I said....even if this is true on an ultra small quantum level (Id have to research this particular issue before commenting one way or another on the validity of this statement)...but if true on a some quantum level...by your own admission this is far to small even to be measured, let alone get any usuably energy from. Plus how can it even be proven if it is not measureable?
these small "quantum" affects (as you call them) can be stacked up to a measureable level. Working models of permanent batteries that require no charging and never run down have been pioneered successfully, yes!
A magnet is a finite structure....with only so much matter...In order to 'stack' enough of them together to see any appreciable effect...considering the effect shown in one magnet is so small it cannot even be measured..... would make it beyond impracticle.......Unless you are suggesting something different from this? If so please explain it to me......
Cool....I placed a link here for you to read the other day.....but now I do not see it.....perhaps i mistakingly did not hit the "post comment" button or made some other silly error LOL....anyway....If I can find the site again I will repost it....it was about misconceptions of Electricity......Thanks again, though I will be looking forward to anything you send me. Please dont take anything Ive said as hostility....I love a good debate,and have so far enjoyed R disagreements LOL
some people are idiots..im an electrician and i have never heard of a current that isnt real... to have current you must have an induced voltage...he seems to have that clearly..he has a load(the small light globe) which is GLOWING because there is a current(real Electriciity for those who are too dumb to understand electrical terminology) flowing through it. seems cut and dry to me.
For all those naysayers out there, where is your video with your magic electricity???
Define "real current" Is this a current then can do work? How much work? Is there a line? Any voltage into any load will produce a current to flow. Any current is real current. What else would it be? Magic current?
LOL! they can kiss mine too. They are just sheep, and sheep follow the herd. Keep up the good work, and don't let them drag you down. I'm working on the same thing, but I don't really care to put anything up on youtube because of the sheep. It looks to me that you are working out the details, as am I, and we'll figure it all out. much respect!
Your meter is calibrated to measure DC and sinusoidal AC current. The current spikes this machine produces will not even show up. Thats why you charge your battery from another power source, not the "free energy". Use a high frequency current and an o-scope and you will be able to see the actual current, the area under the curve on the input side will be larger than the area on the output side...
kiss ur ass?? lol this proves nothing man, try loading it up with as many light bulbs as you can until they start to dim for starters, current isn't supplied, it's drawn.
bit of ohms law wouldn't hurt ya either tho I'm sure others have brought this up in thier comments, that said, at least ur havin a go, just try not to shoot your mouth off before you know what you're on about :)
Man you dont half get alot of pricks out there ready to disporve or agrue somthing they dont understand lol. im doing the bedini circuit myselkf - here in england. iv been messing with the reed switches, that produce a shead load more back EMF, an i ran it directly into a cap and ran a moter off of it whilst it was still charging the cap. these guys a moorons lol. your set up looks grate and sterdy - unlike mine with the polerstyreen bace and chip board xD. all the best to you ^___^
1) Hook up an oscilloscope already. STOP making assumptions about power. You don't know the pulse widths. If the current pulses are out of phase with your voltage, your power is MUCH less than you think.
2) Take off that stupid battery. If you want to know if you have more power out than you put in, why would you have a power source at all. Connect the output to the input!
No garage tinkering, bedini follower ever does these simple things. Why? cause it would show how little you know!
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Drive coil moves driven coil with a loss in copper wires (net loss due to heat). Even with super conducting cables you may get 1:1 ( 1 to 1 ) ratio of efficiency, with a loss incurred by air restriction on the magnets and pipe as they spin, and a loss in friction in the bearings or bushings. Also the vibration of the shaft will put irregular loads on the shaft and create resonant frequency damping.
The battery is the only thing bedini found which can convert the radiant into usable energy. The battery is part of what makes it work..Instead of people complaining about numbers, why not put your money where your mouth is and do the replication. Easy to take cheapshots at these replicators without putting yourself out there isn't it?
Forgot to add, you can use a capacitor to also rectify the radiant, and possibly feed that to the input, but you would need an elaborate setup with timed switching from the capacitor to dump the energy. It would be complex and have to be tuned perfectly but it is possible, and others have already done it. Check out bedini window cole motor on google video.
Take the output wattage away from the input wattage = 6.953W
This machine, in the condition shown still uses more energy than it outputs. The real outcome will be decided by the efficiency of the windmill style generator extracting energy from the rotational motion.
OK, one flaw in your assumption of the current being less than what the meter is reading... depending on the meter, they usually average out pulses inside the meter, so it is probably more current in each pulse than the meter shows. You should hook a scope to it to see the pulse widths...
Excellent job for showing the input volts and amps vs the output volts and amps.
I do believe there is more energy coming out of the device than going in.
You can't get energy for nothing. So, where is the extra energy coming from? The extra energy emitted to light the bulb is generated at the expense of the magnets. What this means, the magnets are losing charge and will after days be weaker. Thus, the output will drop and drop to unity and then less.
if they lost there charge in this way people useing windmills with perm.mag. gens would have them stuff out after days or weeks and ive heard of them lasting 10-20 years
Todd: Stop using the term FUEL! This is TOTALLY FUEL-LESS drive! The first circuit can turn 6 or more 3-phase alternators - this will run 36v vehicle through controler. Ignore "overunity", the Alternator is TOTALLY SEPARATE from the initial pulse one. It is a SPECIAL CASE of the Thevenin "Black Box" principle! This finishes OIL in transport - FOREVER! Keep working - just ADD to what you have already done! Need Vehicle, come to BioMod comm.
My calcs show .8262W in and 1.2936W out (assuming steady current in both cases which you stipulate the input is less).
If the current is not being dragged out of the source battery we should be able to design a two stage capacitor circuit to make this self running. Charge one cap as you show here. Using another of your magnetic switches dicharge the cap into the secondary capacitor when the back EMF is zero. The secondary cap is the store for your primary winding on the pulse coil.
2.: I would use 1 Farad super caps in the necessary series parallel configuration to achieve the necessary store. You will obviously need to prime the circuit with a battery (or hand crank you rotor a good many times) to get it going. But if your calcs are correct it should self run.
why cant you just plug it into the wall? Or just go and buy a battery charger from walmart they are about 8 bucks. Is that what you are trying to do is get the battery charged? If not you can just get electricity from any outlet in your house if you just pay the electric bill. Then you can drive your delorean 88 MPH with the flux compacitor and get to 2012 and find out the score of the Knicks game.
baaaaaa the sheep said,, lets give our wealth away to the Power Industry and let them enslave you more. So Drew go to your walmart,,buy your battery charger plug it in and say baaaaa, at least sheep need herders!
keep up the great research Todd! I'm backing you 120% and don't pay any attention to these sheep out there trying to break your focus, you have not to prove yourself, nor your ideas to these sheep! we know its real Stay on track and you will have great satisfaction.
I have the same multimeter, its not broken it unfortunately does that by design. I was trained in the Air Force as an avionics tech, and even though we had digital multimeters, we all carried and preferred analog.
Another little pointer: Take a 12-volt relay and connect the relay coil across your power supply. Put your index and middle finger across the coil terminals of the relay. When you disconnect the power supply you will feel a 100-volt jolt across your fingers coming from the collapse of the magnetic field in the coil. You will notice that when you connect the power to the coil that you don't feel a jolt.
It's different for the secondary coil that goes through the full-bridge rectifier that goes to the capacitor/bulb (or in many of your experiments to the charging battery). In this case there is a spike of voltage when you create the magnetic field in the coil as well as when the magnetic field in the coil collapses. So you get a "double spike", one when the primary coil is energized when the relay switches on, and one when the relay switches off.
you mentioned in the last video that you were going to put together a full set up so that we can all try to copy. Are you working on that? When will the next video be? I find myself checking everyday-looking for ward to see your next video Thanks
Hey Todd. I have a suggestion for you for improving your measurement of the current coming out of the battery. To sound like a broken record, it looks like the multimeter cannot make an accurate measurement of the current drain from the battery. Setting up a low pass filter to decouple the battery from the motor load might do the trick. I can elaborate on that later if you are interested.
I had a revolation...When I hooked the anolog meter directly inline with the coil instead of off the battery, I was showing about 300ma. When I put the chargeback circuit (diode and cap)directly on the coil it again dropped down to about 100ma which brings me back to about 1.2watts in and 1.8 watts out.
If you set up a filter between the battery and the pulse motor, the current coming out of the battery will be pretty close to nice smooth DC which your meter will be able to read accurately. Between the battery and the motor you set up a series of capacitors and inductors to act as the low pass filter. The pulse motor will run and act as a pulsing and possibly "spikey" load, just like before. I have never done this myself, I am just making an educated assumption.
I will try that. I just had my caps POP last night. I had my motor going about 2000rpms with diodes going back to the pulsing battery from the secondary coil and alternator. The voltage was increasing and then suddenly they blew. BOTH of them.
You can see a clue about the caps popping at the end of your clip here. The light bulb flashes very brightly during your current measurement for the bulb. For a short time there is no load, and current keeps getting pumped into the capacitor from the secondary coil making the voltage across the capacitor increase. Your spikes are probably around 100 volts, so the 50 volt cap in this experiment could probably blow also if there is no load for a longer time.
My good. If Todd's multimeter lie. Then look at the load! There is 2W lamp under load, right? So it give more than he put it. Or what are you trying to prove?
0.068 amps at 3:30 sec of de vid is the average if you've set your meter on DC current meter. So it's actually what you draw effectively while during the pulse itself it's much higher. But power is I X V = P and all these are averages or effective values when alternating voltages and currents are involved.
Litz is individually insulated stranded wire. Try this for your coils, that are having the magnetic fields produce the current. Magnetic field over 1 wire = d. Magnetic field over 105 individually insulated wires = d x 105. :)
So, you have a wire twelve inches long and you can make 12 millivolts moving a magnet across it.
If you have a wire 1000 feet long and you move the same small magnetic field across the length of it you can create much more voltage potential perhaps 12,000 millivolts lets say.
So, you have managed to generate a significant amount of electric power with a weak magnetic force.
OK, how does this help us? where am I going with this?
Suppose you have 1,000 pieces of wire twelve inches long and you run the same weak magnetic field over them all at the same time..... you get the same flow of electrons.
If the wires are run in series then you will get the 12,000 millivolts etc.
If you connect the wires in parallel you will get higher current but lower voltage.
However, the power potential is the same whether you run the wires in series or parallel.
A point about these devices is that technically their not considered over-unity because they need a power source to amplify. Generator is more accurate. In terms of practicality of this specific generator, It could technically be replicated at a much larger scale for one to use to charge batteries being used by a house. havent seen a vid on that! Though there are some vids here that show multi-battery set-ups using a bendini generator. I still have doubts about the charge ability of these.proof?
joedanero 5 months ago
DeadJack57 is correct. I appreciate you showing input volts and amps vs output volts and amps, but I would encourage you to put an oscilloscope on your output. I suspect you will see a spikey output which will give you erroneous readings on a multimeter. The capacitor alone will not give you a perfectly flat, noiseless dc output.
yttermayn 6 months ago
this shits bad ass man. All done in a garage with house hold resources. All the naysayers or whatever can suck your dick my friend. I hope you drop that load all of their faces. This might come as a surprise to some of you but part of science is experimentation. Raise your hand if you think the gasoline engine worked the first time.... with limited resources. I would love to see you raise it.
ZachLowry 6 months ago
Dude, you are still hooked up to a battery. Try producing current without a power supply like Tessla talked about in a vaccuum in the form of radient energy.
Cambria0001 7 months ago
Hey forget the NAY SAYERS, you march forward and discover the future.
saracomm 7 months ago
Try it on non-rechargable batteries (with caution of course because heat and explosion is a possibility). It is a fun surprise. Also a good circuit for electrolysis or anodizing metal in solution more evenly.
DeadJack57 10 months ago
Why not demonstrate this device in a more practical way?
Why not power some form of device with this thing, and then power another just with a battery, and run them together. If the device make the battery last twice as long while doing the same amount of work, then that would demonstrate that it works.
Or why not run the output into the input and disconnect he battery?
sagarat 1 year ago
@sagarat why when power output is significantly higher?
DeadJack57 10 months ago
@DeadJack57
Because the meters used to measure the output can be fooled by unstable output. IT can be reading peed output, not average output.
Therefore, unless this thing can be demonstrated to do something useful, like prolong the life of a battery, then is is by definition use-less.
sagarat 10 months ago
@sagarat Considering that it actually recharges batteries faster than DC current, I would have to say it does something useful, even more so that once you disconnect it the voltage continues to rise - very novel. The fact that he is using a very large cap filter further proves that it is reading constant current. I have an associates in EE and Rick's demo kit to play around with. Nice try.
DeadJack57 10 months ago
@sagarat In fact, it can even recharge multiple batteries to equal voltage from a single battery. This is even more novel, considering it can be fed from a solar panel with constant voltage. This is the area it gets even more over-unity, with 100% free energy from the solar panel. That's what happens when you hook your circuit up to nature, it pays you back tenfold.
DeadJack57 10 months ago
What you're doing is exactly what the Power Co's do to bring power into your home.
You have just created a transformer.
Most people think the power coming into their homes is from the power Co's source, this is not true. The power is induced at the pole in the transformer with an induction coil.
They would rather you not know this!
icicicles 1 year ago
really great work.. definitely not a naysayer, but i think maybe instead of bashing you they should have just pointed out the voltage across your load is necessary to determine the output watts, also taking into consideration the load must be calculated according to your resistance for a "proper" reading which is all impossible IMO anyways... i say who cares as long as the batts are swappable. your vids helped me get started on the bedini too so thanks man =)
Magneticitist 1 year ago
have you used a scope or a filter on the input? the digital meters are notorious for poor filtering above 10 hz. and that babies running at quite a bit. input is a major pulse not a smooth flow.
doccpu7 1 year ago
This is not over unity get your facts strait, supply a schematic, get some real data on the pulsed current, You are fooling yourself with the readings you are getting, because the meter you are using, and the way you are using it, is not by far, an accurate way of measuring the actual energy consumed or delivered by the circuit. Please consult an engineer get him to do the tests and if he still finds that your circuit is over unity, we will kiss your ... :)
Claude77 1 year ago
Connect the output to the input and it should run by itself. If not it means the input and output readings are flawed.
ZoeMarks 1 year ago
I'd like to see this experiment repeated with the voltage drop measured across a shunt to determine the current. It is the most accurate method I know of to measure current.
I think the real test, though, is to get it started with the battery then feed the output back into the device and see if it keeps running. If you are, in fact getting 63% more power out than you are putting in as your numbers suggest it should be no problem and the motor should run until the bearings wear out.
wperry1 1 year ago
Free energy can change the world!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
narragansettharco 1 year ago
Good demonstration. The math works.
cxd4 1 year ago
Good. About time you stood up and told these people here to go take a flying phuhckkkkk!. Magnets and collapsing fields go hand and hand like adam and eve.
Anothercoilgun 1 year ago
Power loss. Power in is - then power out. All you have shown is a lack of understanding how to calculate power. you get a A for effort and mechanics but an F for physics and math. I would be very embarrassed if I was you.
auroraron 1 year ago
Not that I'm knocking your efforts here, so keep up the good work. Just wanted to point out one thing. You disconnected the wire and ran the current through the ammeter to try and measure the amperage. This is wrong, as you want to leave the wires connected and just touch the ammeter probes to either end of the operating wire. That will give you an accurate ammeter reading. Pushing the load through the meter gives you an inaccurate reading, and usually burns out meters. ;)
KOakaKO 1 year ago
Notice as soon as he disconnected the battery the light went out, even though his motor was still turning. That in itself proves the current to light the lamp comes from the battery. or the lamp would have stayed lit when battery disconnected and the motor was turning it would have kept the lamp lit except the lamp current comes from the battery. Also notice he is such a genius he cant keep amps and volts in order
1Rowdy1derful 1 year ago
fuck you all who dises this guy, how about you actually reproduce his experiment before your bichass says something, all those ney sayers, your gay
22crazyhelen 1 year ago 4
@22crazyhelen gay my ass you stupid jerk. I was running my transistor radio on solar cells before this guys dad was born. And I am here to tell you this is a pile of crap read my post about it, simple diagnosis, your the gay one not to mention the stupid assed one.
1Rowdy1derful 1 year ago
Those who say it can't be done should stay out of the way of the ones doing it. People get so worked up and angry over this stuff. I'm willing to bet most, if not all of the naysayers on here have never actually tried it and if they did, it was to try and disprove this technology, so of course they started out biased. Much respect to those who share their research freely instead of hoarding it to try and make a buck. :-)
Libertasfalsus 1 year ago 3
Every thing in this world is theory. Nothing is set in stone. Some day someone will do something that goes against mans laws of physics then again will will have to change the law. 1800's people were told that going over 60 MPH would peel your face off. Today people travel at 17000 MPH yet there face don't peel off. Interesting.
stupidbabyg 2 years ago 3
Laws of perpetual mouvement machines :
1- they don't need inicial impulse to start running.
2- once running they don't stop unless brake is aplied.
3- they work without electric wires/motors attached.
4- and finaly... they don't work, whatever you do.
If any of these rules is violated, is a fake machine.
jotacril 2 years ago
@jotacril where the hell did those laws come from? "What, are you f*king 2?
Do you actually think that Horton Heard a Who?
Do you still think that Santa brings you gifts?
That Michael Jackson didnt have facelifts?...science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief may be preserved..."
sounds to me like those laws are bad science from someone a little too close to the spanish inquisition.
PikeyBlu 2 years ago
@jotacril They also said Pluto was a planet.
sharkeeeee 1 year ago
People who don't know the laws of physics, are going to be the ones who break them. Joe Schmoe in his garage will be the first to power his home on a drop of water. Kinda like the guy who discovered the formula for the tiles on the space shuttle. No degrees in chemistry just mixed some crap together and here ya go.
stupidbabyg 2 years ago 17
Comment removed
Lovestheanswerdotcom 1 year ago
Battery power in: 12.15V x 0.068A = 0.8262W
Load: 7.7V x 0.17A = 1.209W
So , it appears as though more power is coming out than goes in.
I suggest to modify either the running or output coils so that the output voltage is higher than the input voltage. This is needed for the unit to feed itself and recharge its own battery. If this can be achieved and demonstrated, I will personally fund further development.
Lovestheanswerdotcom 1 year ago
@stupidbabyg wow couldn't agree more
Magneticitist 1 year ago
@stupidbabyg Someone like what you described recently invented a supersteel 7% stronger than regular and tougher than some titaniums. Google: Gary Cola- Flash Bainite. He was a DIYer like this. Stay optimistic Stupidbabyq *thumb-up*
joedanero 5 months ago
Dr Paul LaViolette - over unity.
in 5sec he describes using a nickel coin in a table expirement that shows over unity.
rcacad 2 years ago
Its a joke that energy cannot be created from "nothing", the same people that stop these things (genuine-run-your-house-on-things) from going commercial are the same people that earn the majority of money in the world by supplying electricity and other fuel to you. All over the world electricity poles fall down and start bush fires destroying peoples houses and lives, and they say "Oh sorry we're not sure about our procedures we'll double check them next time".
SGde3a 2 years ago
Dr Paul LaViolette
rcacad 2 years ago
@SGde3a What the hell are you trying to say. Are you just plain nuts or did you practice at it?
1Rowdy1derful 1 year ago
@1Rowdy1derful Ahh at the time of writing that... a little nuts.
SGde3a 1 year ago
What is your background?
Energy cannot be created from nothing!
Read : Antoine Lavoisier
Illusion of some good people to think that such thing as free energy is possible, don't loose your time or money.
tomazsilva 2 years ago
as soon as your release this the government will kill you
RichardJordan100 2 years ago 3
yeah, with a few thousand yt hits....big target he is
rcacad 2 years ago
I totally believe that an amateur with a room full of left over garbage has just produced an over unity machine.
The only thing missing is the proper equipment to analyze what's actually going on. I have a feeling that step will never happen.
adisharr 2 years ago
thats a prison you guys live in, you pay for any Fuel out there, an if there is an device that would let oyu break off this prison, do you realy think that the gov would allow that?
RomH4ck 2 years ago
I am challenging you to actually take this unit out into your driveway, and without all the wires and junk on your bench..... hand start this machine without the battery, and produce more ACTUAL energy than you are using.....Stop with the smoke and mirrors and make it work without false readings from your digimeter.....Lets see that one !! Bet you can't do it......LOL
copiercer 2 years ago
Do any of you who back up this S$%t really believe that there is more energy coming out of this setup than is going in ?? You ALL failed junior high school science didn't you !!! If this is REAL.....then we can confidently pass up all of our problems, and just move straight into space!!
copiercer 2 years ago
so who the fock would allow you to do so? Huh? wo the fok will allow you to get out of control from industri? who the fok will allow you to cut off billions from industri? tell me who?
RomH4ck 2 years ago
u good and thax for doing something good. don't listen the people who saying it's not truth. they may work for tha oil company. of course they don't want to see things like yours. thinkabout the oil busnisse. it's a largest business on earth. more than guns, more than drugs! so keep doing what u do
jozsefboviz 2 years ago
Thanks for the Vid. its peeps like us that make the world go round...
Look what they did to tesla and now were building and improving on his concepts.
nsobieck 2 years ago
what is peoples problem.... this guy is doing something to try to help the world! and what are you doing? spending time just putting him down.... sure it might not be perfect but he's trying. if everyone was like this guy we would probably have a perfect energy supply by now...
bowd19 2 years ago 21
No, we'd simply have wasted more power, converting it to local heat, and wasted valuable resources.
mcskifter 2 years ago
can you hook up the output current strait to the motor and get rid of the battery maybe put a control on it?
hewboltinvention 2 years ago
Hmmm,,,Using P=EI,,,12.15 x .068 = .826Watts usage,,,,,and produced,,,7.7 x .170ma = 1.309 Watts,,,,WOW,,, Over Unity!,,,Producing More Than You Use,,,But is that the total usage from BOTH Batteries 68ma??? You have to sure you are really getting totals and that you are reading the meters right,,I notice yoy make a mistake in the beginning calling .068 milliamps, millivolts,,so do you have any electronics training or are you guessing???
bill99959 2 years ago
So tragic to not be able to measure the current correctly. Fooling himself that it works.
zzytrewq 2 years ago
Those VOMs are only accurate when measuring either sinusoidal AC or DC current. Since the current is pulsing, your current value is wrong.
You need to put in a small series resistor, and use a fast oscilloscope to measure the current spike from the battery. Then integrate over one period to find the actual current.
This is typical of pulsed circuits when mixed with VOMs, and why Newman and Bedini like them, because it allows them to make bad measurements in their favor.
SuperArglebargle 2 years ago 2
The energy in the bulb seems to be coming from the secondary coil which seems to be driven by a pulse through the primary coil connected to the battery. Without the battery the system seems to stop dead. If the alternator can generate enough current then the system should work without the battery once it gets up to speed.
skippycto 2 years ago
voltage potential does real work to just like amperage mabe to a greater effect
prototype9000 2 years ago
A system is defined by its components, try adding more magnets and more coils and make it even more effecient?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
if your math is correct, hook the output back up to the input and it will run self sufficiently?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago 2
My theory is the magnets are inducing emf in the coils making an otherwise inefficient motor more efficient. In other words the output is closer to 100% effeciency of the system than the power in. The power in side of the circuit loses power through friction, resistance in the bearings etc... the output side has none of those losses to consider and is therefore more effcient.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
you rule!
rayroy3 2 years ago
Okay. Let's assume that the device is working as you describe. So the power must be coming from somewhere. I think quantum physics would be involved.
It would be really cool to know just exactly what is happening, in order to make the device even more efficient.
RupertsCrystals 2 years ago
RupertsCrystals, check out the free energy research documents by T.E. Bearden. Knowing what exactly what is happening is great, but that won't make this device more or less efficient, dig? To paraphrase Beardens writings, all electric circuits draw energy from the quantum vacuum, only the way that we have learned to design our circuits uses half of the energy we receive to shut down the flow of energy from the quantum vacuum. Pulsing a circuit at the right frequency saves the day.
rayroy3 2 years ago
If the light bulb was powered by the motor, why did it instantly go out when you disconnected the battery, despite the motor still moving just as fast as when you disconnected it?
LPFthings 2 years ago
it seems the motor is not generating electricity it is picking it up through the resonance in the coils?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
IF this device truley works as claimed....then I would guess you are right.....If the energy was coming from the magnetic coil...then it would be draining it.....The free energy devices that I have seen that seem to be legit seem to suck energy from nothing (as in ZP energy). Many of the more legit sounding ones indeed seem to do this using some kind of magnetic field fluxing at a resonance of some sort. Of course I dont know if this device is realy doing this, I would have to study it.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
there is a lot of mystery around ZP energy but I think the extra energy is coming from the magnets. Magnets are like crude permanent batteries continuously charged from the ether by their atom arrangement and their electron spin... elecricity is like a condensed form of magnetism.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
It may be possible of course....however if it is possible to suck energy from a magnet then it would not be any more useufull than a regular battery....since energy cannot be made or destroyed you would end up depleting the magnets energy and it would just get weaker and weaker...running out as a battery does...However if by resonating the flux(or whatever) the Magnet sucks energy in from the ZP field around it....then it would be virtualy inexhaustable.....
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
yes, magnets do not run out!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Under normal conditions a magnet will last a very long time......however, since energy cannot be created or destroyed only changed in form, if you were to take energy from a magnet in some fashion....then you would be depleting it and it would indeed run out. However....IF you can get the mag to somehow suck in more energy from ZP....then it will not be using up its own energy. A magnet does not "use" energy when it moves a piece of metal...the metal is only finding equilibrium in D mag field
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
the energy in a magnet comes form its atoms and electrons, they are continuously being brought into a state of charge by the radiant energy of the universe... I think to say "zero point" energy is a misunderstanding of the principles. A magnet does not use energy it gives energy to a coil of wire for example which is simply capturing its free flowing electromagnetic fields. A very long time is a VERY LONG TIME lol
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
No I think you are misunderstanding the concepts behind magnetism and how it can make electric current flow in a wire. A magnet can only make current flow in a wire if if that magnetic field is fluxing in some fashion. A magnet sitting next to a coil will not cause current to flow in a coil. The magnet field has to be moving...this is why Generators generally spin a magnet in the presence of a coil to work. Otherwise an electromagnet can be turned off and on or flipped{continued in sep response}
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
A magnet sitting next to a coil will induce current in the coil but it is too weak to measure. I have diagrams of permanent batterys made from stationary magnets and coils showing measureable current flow. NO mechanical energy!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
The energy comes form what you might call "zero point" but the term is just a generalisation of a misunderstanding. The energy comes from the atoms and electrons which are continuously charged by the radiant energy of our solar sun.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Zero Point energy is taken seriously by most physcicists: there's a lot of good math behind the theory. Basically there is a sea of Energy around us even in an absolute vaccume. Read up on it....it is quite fascinating and has been proven to the satisfaction of most physcicists. The problem is tapping into it. Many of the credible looking magnet based OVRUNTY dev. seem to tap this by fluxing the mag at resonance (among other possibilities). this is based on real physics. On what R yours based?
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
..my what lol? They havn't proven anything except maybe that their theories might be correct !!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Well actually ZP energy was first proposed by Einstein....and since then the theory has indeed been proven with observable results such as the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift. Theories also suggest that ZP energy is responsible for explaining the speculative positive values of the proposed cosmological constant. So the theory is in good standing for sure. Do the ideas you subscribe to propose any effects which have been observed by scientists? Or has there been any other verifiable results?
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
for sure LOL theories are theories! No-one has knowingly tapped ZP energy! There is ALWAYS a cause behind an affect... I happen to agree, energy exists throughout the universe on a level so small and of a magnitude so great we can only begin to comprehend the idea with the expression "zero point". To me it is like trying to rationalise God's Mind... where do thoughts come from? Can you measure them? Do they have cause and affect? Does this make them real or unreal accord. to your science?
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
I discovered Tom Beardon already his intellect is great but fallible.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
I do not know this is the case, but maybe on a quantum level where weirdness is the natural order of things...sure why not. By your admission these are much too small to even be measured let alone cause any actual work to be done. the energy to do work still has to come from SOMEWHERE...and there would not be enough energy in a magnet to even be measured on its own. Hence fluxing the mag field through mechanical (or other)action is only way to get workable E....a mag is the means not the source.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
Magnets are a means for transferring electrical energy into mechanical work and vice versa, they are also a source of weak electrical power.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
You think, I understand!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
{here is my continuation from my past reply} an electromagnet can be turned off and on or flipped which will cause the same effect as a spinning (or just moving) magnet. A magnet does not give energy to a coil....it simply transfers mechanical energy from the movement of its field to electrical energy, just as many other process do (for instance pyroelectric with heat...or piezoelectric when hiting a crystal....energy can never be created or destroyed....it can transform and move though
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
I don't think mechanical energy is transformed into electrical energy directly. When hitting a piezo crystal for example you are compressing the structure and releasing electrical energy from the atomic arrangement. The mechanical energy is just the force needed to induce that effect. With magnets the coil is capturing electrons which are not condensed sufficiently when the magnet is stationary. Moving the magnet thru the coil allows more of the electrons to be captured from the magnetic field.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Actually it is...and it is even reverseable.....by sending an electrical pulse into a crystal you get mechanical motion....
Same with a magnet. sending electricity through a coil will cause the magnet to spin.....
Its a good clue that you are simply transforming energy since it can be reversed back and forth...
What of pyroelectric devices...with two different metals are heated and that heat is changed into electrical energy. Dont mistake elec charge for energy, this is ur mistake perhaps?
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
with pyro. the two metals have dissimilar atomic structures. When heated one structure expands more than the other creating a potential difference in the atoms electrical charge. Of course electrical charge is energy! Energy being the "potential to do work". What mistake lol
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
It is like pushing a domino into a bowl of water and creating a splash, the energy of the push is not transformed into a splash although at a subatomic level it might look like it. One is just causing a reaction in the other.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
From your other replies you seem to have a veiw of energy as something which almost comes into existance magicaly and is replenished magically. Rather than something which simply transforms from one form to the other...You also seem to be confusing the nature of energy and electricity. All energy is simply the equalization of an imbalance. Through this movement work can be done.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
No the energy comes form sources you are unaware of, I never said it was magical, that is your rationalisation of something you cannot explain. In your terms electricity is an imbalance it wants to reach equilibrium with any node that has less charge than itself. Like you said thru this transfer of energy is the ability to cause work to be done, even if it does not "do" the work itself... a magnet is continuously charged by the radiant energy the driving force behind the physical universe.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
I think in order to bring new understanding into your equation you are going to need some new theories to think about, would you like me to suggest some reading material? lol science does love to be challenged with new ways of thinking...
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Now you are speaking my language!
Im always willing to read new Ideas even if I may not agree with them (I try to stay open minded.....just not so open my brain falls out....yeah I know thats an old joke...but its accurate! LOL) Nothing makes me happier than challenging my knowledge....& I dont even mind finding out that Im wrong......(if it were to ever happen I mean LOL)<----yeah Im joking :)
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
cool, there isn't right or wrong technically, there are just models of understanding, each new model surpasses the old model integrating the old way at the same time! when I get a minute I will send you some links and we can have a meeting of minds LOL regards :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Electricity and magnetism are essentially the same energy, it has to do with atomic alignment and the direction of the electron spin.
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
That is why there is ALWAYS a magnetic field effect in an electrical wire and ALWAYS a current induced by a magnet...
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Like I said....even if this is true on an ultra small quantum level (Id have to research this particular issue before commenting one way or another on the validity of this statement)...but if true on a some quantum level...by your own admission this is far to small even to be measured, let alone get any usuably energy from. Plus how can it even be proven if it is not measureable?
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
these small "quantum" affects (as you call them) can be stacked up to a measureable level. Working models of permanent batteries that require no charging and never run down have been pioneered successfully, yes!
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
A magnet is a finite structure....with only so much matter...In order to 'stack' enough of them together to see any appreciable effect...considering the effect shown in one magnet is so small it cannot even be measured..... would make it beyond impracticle.......Unless you are suggesting something different from this? If so please explain it to me......
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
not enough room in one box for this one I will email you the links OK then you can read up and make your own opinions :)
MattBlytheTheOne 2 years ago
Cool....I placed a link here for you to read the other day.....but now I do not see it.....perhaps i mistakingly did not hit the "post comment" button or made some other silly error LOL....anyway....If I can find the site again I will repost it....it was about misconceptions of Electricity......Thanks again, though I will be looking forward to anything you send me. Please dont take anything Ive said as hostility....I love a good debate,and have so far enjoyed R disagreements LOL
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
This is a true overunity generator, only a real experimenter will understand , the others are only coward people.
frehleyukito 2 years ago
Your a law of physics nazi
crapkillerz 2 years ago
some people are idiots..im an electrician and i have never heard of a current that isnt real... to have current you must have an induced voltage...he seems to have that clearly..he has a load(the small light globe) which is GLOWING because there is a current(real Electriciity for those who are too dumb to understand electrical terminology) flowing through it. seems cut and dry to me.
For all those naysayers out there, where is your video with your magic electricity???
bigfella11 2 years ago
You can find a decent oscilloscope on eBay for about $50. I got a B+K 15mhz dual trace in excellent condition for that.
Then maybe you will be able to see exactly what is going on in your circuit.
Davetech23 2 years ago
go figure spinning magnets passing by a coil lights a bulb, and the spinning magnets are powered by battery.....duh?
corkedmachinima 2 years ago
Define "real current" Is this a current then can do work? How much work? Is there a line? Any voltage into any load will produce a current to flow. Any current is real current. What else would it be? Magic current?
lazzer408 2 years ago
sweeet
bogdy72000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Another Great job!
uncleshorty 2 years ago
LOL! they can kiss mine too. They are just sheep, and sheep follow the herd. Keep up the good work, and don't let them drag you down. I'm working on the same thing, but I don't really care to put anything up on youtube because of the sheep. It looks to me that you are working out the details, as am I, and we'll figure it all out. much respect!
jimgodsey2012 3 years ago
159% efficent good job
j1crx 3 years ago
Dont let yer mind get fucked by all mindless ants that´s pissing about stuff.. do yer thing and use it well, it´ll be time for all this to come forth
Rylonim 3 years ago
Your meter is calibrated to measure DC and sinusoidal AC current. The current spikes this machine produces will not even show up. Thats why you charge your battery from another power source, not the "free energy". Use a high frequency current and an o-scope and you will be able to see the actual current, the area under the curve on the input side will be larger than the area on the output side...
essaysoftware 3 years ago
kiss ur ass?? lol this proves nothing man, try loading it up with as many light bulbs as you can until they start to dim for starters, current isn't supplied, it's drawn.
bit of ohms law wouldn't hurt ya either tho I'm sure others have brought this up in thier comments, that said, at least ur havin a go, just try not to shoot your mouth off before you know what you're on about :)
Jimmeh30 3 years ago
Man you dont half get alot of pricks out there ready to disporve or agrue somthing they dont understand lol. im doing the bedini circuit myselkf - here in england. iv been messing with the reed switches, that produce a shead load more back EMF, an i ran it directly into a cap and ran a moter off of it whilst it was still charging the cap. these guys a moorons lol. your set up looks grate and sterdy - unlike mine with the polerstyreen bace and chip board xD. all the best to you ^___^
lykenth08 3 years ago
1) Hook up an oscilloscope already. STOP making assumptions about power. You don't know the pulse widths. If the current pulses are out of phase with your voltage, your power is MUCH less than you think.
2) Take off that stupid battery. If you want to know if you have more power out than you put in, why would you have a power source at all. Connect the output to the input!
No garage tinkering, bedini follower ever does these simple things. Why? cause it would show how little you know!
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
Your math is correct.
ntprofile 3 years ago
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Drive coil moves driven coil with a loss in copper wires (net loss due to heat). Even with super conducting cables you may get 1:1 ( 1 to 1 ) ratio of efficiency, with a loss incurred by air restriction on the magnets and pipe as they spin, and a loss in friction in the bearings or bushings. Also the vibration of the shaft will put irregular loads on the shaft and create resonant frequency damping.
ntprofile 3 years ago
Wattage In Vs. Wattage Out is?? Ultimate test would be to remove the battery from the equation and feed the input with the output...
neotarget 3 years ago
The battery is the only thing bedini found which can convert the radiant into usable energy. The battery is part of what makes it work..Instead of people complaining about numbers, why not put your money where your mouth is and do the replication. Easy to take cheapshots at these replicators without putting yourself out there isn't it?
mutwa 3 years ago
Forgot to add, you can use a capacitor to also rectify the radiant, and possibly feed that to the input, but you would need an elaborate setup with timed switching from the capacitor to dump the energy. It would be complex and have to be tuned perfectly but it is possible, and others have already done it. Check out bedini window cole motor on google video.
mutwa 3 years ago
think hybrid dude add an element
Englanish29 3 years ago
run it by your local University then and see what happens- if you're so sure-
Englanish29 3 years ago
Input -
Battery - 12.15V @ 0.68A = 8.262W
Output -
Cap and Bulb - 7.70V @ 0.17A = 1.309W
Take the output wattage away from the input wattage = 6.953W
This machine, in the condition shown still uses more energy than it outputs. The real outcome will be decided by the efficiency of the windmill style generator extracting energy from the rotational motion.
Pwordchernoir 3 years ago
You have 680 milliamps in your equation, and his multimeter shows 68 milliamps... Fail
3dSorcery 3 years ago
Why are you still making video's when you could be a millionaire instantly?
Dud.
Ries
electrique527 3 years ago
OK, one flaw in your assumption of the current being less than what the meter is reading... depending on the meter, they usually average out pulses inside the meter, so it is probably more current in each pulse than the meter shows. You should hook a scope to it to see the pulse widths...
tdetogne27 3 years ago
kt, why are you using a relay when triac or transistor would be nearly silent operation?
mre2u2 3 years ago
transformer.
yes it is real current
read amp on motor with no cap & light
then compare to this reading
loved your alt design but didn't agree with schematic of it. couldn't tell what was wrong but didn't look right. good job tho keep it up.
terryclot 3 years ago
Excellent job for showing the input volts and amps vs the output volts and amps.
I do believe there is more energy coming out of the device than going in.
You can't get energy for nothing. So, where is the extra energy coming from? The extra energy emitted to light the bulb is generated at the expense of the magnets. What this means, the magnets are losing charge and will after days be weaker. Thus, the output will drop and drop to unity and then less.
autobahnmail 3 years ago
if they lost there charge in this way people useing windmills with perm.mag. gens would have them stuff out after days or weeks and ive heard of them lasting 10-20 years
modhifi 3 years ago
my thoughts also.. to KT.. keep it up sir.. were also doing the same thing .. you are not alone...
nextinline123 3 years ago
well said!!!!!! Could you try something like that in bigger scale?
mochiam 3 years ago
The only thing remaining is making it 1000X stronger so you can run your HOUSE on a car battery....SWEET invention!
Shinta786 3 years ago
1,000 times as much and you couldn't use all the power. Have you done the math?
mre2u2 3 years ago
hahaha nice. "don't try to convince the nay sayers" Let those bastards keep paying for their energy. hahaha
b00unty 3 years ago
P.S. you can view some of our "made for electronic drive" vehicles by searching "Photon Drive".
PhotonDrive 3 years ago
Todd: Stop using the term FUEL! This is TOTALLY FUEL-LESS drive! The first circuit can turn 6 or more 3-phase alternators - this will run 36v vehicle through controler. Ignore "overunity", the Alternator is TOTALLY SEPARATE from the initial pulse one. It is a SPECIAL CASE of the Thevenin "Black Box" principle! This finishes OIL in transport - FOREVER! Keep working - just ADD to what you have already done! Need Vehicle, come to BioMod comm.
PhotonDrive 3 years ago
Pls where can i find an HOW TO build this thing ? thx in forward
TheLEAX 3 years ago
My calcs show .8262W in and 1.2936W out (assuming steady current in both cases which you stipulate the input is less).
If the current is not being dragged out of the source battery we should be able to design a two stage capacitor circuit to make this self running. Charge one cap as you show here. Using another of your magnetic switches dicharge the cap into the secondary capacitor when the back EMF is zero. The secondary cap is the store for your primary winding on the pulse coil.
AdminOnDuty 3 years ago
2.: I would use 1 Farad super caps in the necessary series parallel configuration to achieve the necessary store. You will obviously need to prime the circuit with a battery (or hand crank you rotor a good many times) to get it going. But if your calcs are correct it should self run.
AdminOnDuty 3 years ago
i dont get it??? is the megnets are s+s+s+s+s or is it north n+n+n+n+n+n or is it s+n+s+n+s
TheFlyre 3 years ago
why cant you just plug it into the wall? Or just go and buy a battery charger from walmart they are about 8 bucks. Is that what you are trying to do is get the battery charged? If not you can just get electricity from any outlet in your house if you just pay the electric bill. Then you can drive your delorean 88 MPH with the flux compacitor and get to 2012 and find out the score of the Knicks game.
drewmitch666 4 years ago
baaaaaa the sheep said,, lets give our wealth away to the Power Industry and let them enslave you more. So Drew go to your walmart,,buy your battery charger plug it in and say baaaaa, at least sheep need herders!
keep up the great research Todd! I'm backing you 120% and don't pay any attention to these sheep out there trying to break your focus, you have not to prove yourself, nor your ideas to these sheep! we know its real Stay on track and you will have great satisfaction.
Thanks ,,
MoonSpyStudios 3 years ago
Todd. Why the multimeter show 300-400 eaven when it's are not touching capasitor?
Careica 4 years ago
I have the same multimeter, its not broken it unfortunately does that by design. I was trained in the Air Force as an avionics tech, and even though we had digital multimeters, we all carried and preferred analog.
dallasgoldbug 4 years ago
Another little pointer: Take a 12-volt relay and connect the relay coil across your power supply. Put your index and middle finger across the coil terminals of the relay. When you disconnect the power supply you will feel a 100-volt jolt across your fingers coming from the collapse of the magnetic field in the coil. You will notice that when you connect the power to the coil that you don't feel a jolt.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
It's different for the secondary coil that goes through the full-bridge rectifier that goes to the capacitor/bulb (or in many of your experiments to the charging battery). In this case there is a spike of voltage when you create the magnetic field in the coil as well as when the magnetic field in the coil collapses. So you get a "double spike", one when the primary coil is energized when the relay switches on, and one when the relay switches off.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
Todd,
you mentioned in the last video that you were going to put together a full set up so that we can all try to copy. Are you working on that? When will the next video be? I find myself checking everyday-looking for ward to see your next video Thanks
surproster 4 years ago
Hey Todd. I have a suggestion for you for improving your measurement of the current coming out of the battery. To sound like a broken record, it looks like the multimeter cannot make an accurate measurement of the current drain from the battery. Setting up a low pass filter to decouple the battery from the motor load might do the trick. I can elaborate on that later if you are interested.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
I had a revolation...When I hooked the anolog meter directly inline with the coil instead of off the battery, I was showing about 300ma. When I put the chargeback circuit (diode and cap)directly on the coil it again dropped down to about 100ma which brings me back to about 1.2watts in and 1.8 watts out.
ktservicescorp 4 years ago
If you set up a filter between the battery and the pulse motor, the current coming out of the battery will be pretty close to nice smooth DC which your meter will be able to read accurately. Between the battery and the motor you set up a series of capacitors and inductors to act as the low pass filter. The pulse motor will run and act as a pulsing and possibly "spikey" load, just like before. I have never done this myself, I am just making an educated assumption.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
I will try that. I just had my caps POP last night. I had my motor going about 2000rpms with diodes going back to the pulsing battery from the secondary coil and alternator. The voltage was increasing and then suddenly they blew. BOTH of them.
ktservicescorp 4 years ago
You can see a clue about the caps popping at the end of your clip here. The light bulb flashes very brightly during your current measurement for the bulb. For a short time there is no load, and current keeps getting pumped into the capacitor from the secondary coil making the voltage across the capacitor increase. Your spikes are probably around 100 volts, so the 50 volt cap in this experiment could probably blow also if there is no load for a longer time.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
My good. If Todd's multimeter lie. Then look at the load! There is 2W lamp under load, right? So it give more than he put it. Or what are you trying to prove?
Careica 4 years ago
0.068 amps at 3:30 sec of de vid is the average if you've set your meter on DC current meter. So it's actually what you draw effectively while during the pulse itself it's much higher. But power is I X V = P and all these are averages or effective values when alternating voltages and currents are involved.
phoebus1966 4 years ago
please post another video Todd, i'm keen to see how its running. cheers.
Pwordchernoir 4 years ago
If you wish to drastically increase your amperage, change the 26 gauge wire for your coils, to Litz, individually stranded wire!
Great job!
Bruce
TPUBruce 4 years ago
What do you mean? On the secondary coil for the motor? Stranded wire like automotive wire? Should I use 26 gauge as well? I will look up Litz.
Thank you,
Todd
ktservicescorp 4 years ago
Litz is individually insulated stranded wire. Try this for your coils, that are having the magnetic fields produce the current. Magnetic field over 1 wire = d. Magnetic field over 105 individually insulated wires = d x 105. :)
TPUBruce 4 years ago
If you have a small magnetic field moving across a wire twelve inches long it can generate an electron flow equal to lets say one millivolt per inch.
If you move the magnet twelve inches at the same speed you get 12 millivolts as you transgress the twelve inches of wire. (read above)
TPUBruce 4 years ago
So, you have a wire twelve inches long and you can make 12 millivolts moving a magnet across it.
If you have a wire 1000 feet long and you move the same small magnetic field across the length of it you can create much more voltage potential perhaps 12,000 millivolts lets say.
So, you have managed to generate a significant amount of electric power with a weak magnetic force.
OK, how does this help us? where am I going with this?
TPUBruce 4 years ago
(read post below first)
Suppose you have 1,000 pieces of wire twelve inches long and you run the same weak magnetic field over them all at the same time..... you get the same flow of electrons.
If the wires are run in series then you will get the 12,000 millivolts etc.
If you connect the wires in parallel you will get higher current but lower voltage.
However, the power potential is the same whether you run the wires in series or parallel.
TPUBruce 4 years ago
At the end, when you meter current, it start dropping! From 160 to 130 mA. And the bulb start blinking. Maybe I'm wrong...
Careica 4 years ago
It wasn't completely connected to the capacitor at the end just the light bulb.
Todd
ktservicescorp 4 years ago
Ok, then. But where I can find same circuit as like you use?
Careica
Careica 4 years ago
simplemotorsdotcom is a good start.
ktservicescorp 4 years ago